Rice Hoja Blanca: a Complex Plant–Virus–Vector Pathosystem F.J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rice Hoja Blanca: a Complex Plant–Virus–Vector Pathosystem F.J CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 2010 5, No. 043 Review Rice hoja blanca: a complex plant–virus–vector pathosystem F.J. Morales* and P.R. Jennings Address: International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, AA 6713, Cali, Colombia. *Correspondence: F.J. Morales. E-mail: [email protected] Received: 30 April 2010 Accepted: 24 June 2010 doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20105043 The electronic version of this article is the definitive one. It is located here: http://www.cabi.org/cabreviews g CAB International 2009 (Online ISSN 1749-8848) Abstract Rice hoja blanca (RHB; white leaf) devastated rice (Oryza sativa) plantings in tropical America for half a century, before scientists could either identify its causal agent or understand the nature of its cyclical epidemics. The association of the planthopper Tagosodes orizicolus with RHB outbreaks, 20 years after its emergence in South America, suggested the existence of a viral pathogen. However, T. orizicolus could also cause severe direct feeding damage (hopperburn) to rice in the absence of hoja blanca, and breeders promptly realized that the genetic basis of resistance to these problems was different. Furthermore, it was observed that the causal agent of RHB could only be trans- mitted by a relatively low proportion of the individuals in any given population of T. orizicolus and that the pathogen was transovarially transmitted to the progeny of the planthopper vectors, affecting their normal biology. An international rice germplasm screening effort was initiated in the late 1950s to identify sources of resistance against RHB and the direct feeding damage caused by T. orizicolus, making better progress in the development of hopperburn-resistant than for hoja- blanca-resistant rice lines. In the 1980s, the identification of a novel virus as the causal agent of RHB, and genetic studies on the interaction of this virus with its planthopper vector, confirmed previous studies on the pathogenic nature of the virus to T. orizicolus and helped explain the cyclical nature of RHB epidemics. This disease is best controlled by hybridization of susceptible indica and resistant japonica rice genotypes and the adoption of integrated disease control practices. Keywords: Rice hoja blanca (RHB) virus, Oryza sativa, Tagosodes orizicolus, Sogata, Tenuivirus, Echinochloa colona Review Methodology: We searched CAB Abstracts,CIAT’s Rice Program Annual Reports and personal research files. Introduction rice plantings in Brazil, Belize, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Ecuador, Guatemala, Rice ‘hoja blanca’ (white leaf) is one of the most complex, Guyana, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, puzzling, challenging and, all the same, interesting patho- Puerto Rico, Surinam, USA and Venezuela [4]. Besides its systems encountered in the field of plant virology. Rice notable spatial dissemination capacity, the main concern hoja blanca (RHB) gained notoriety in the mid-1950s, of rice growers and agricultural scientists was the sig- when it emerged in the state of Florida, threatening nificant yield losses (25–75%) that this disease could rice production in the southeastern USA [1]. However, induce in susceptible rice cultivars, as a result of seedling RHB was first observed in rice fields of the Cauca Valley death, reduced photosynthetic capacity, plant dwarfing AQ1 department of Colombia, around 1935 [2]. Two decades and panicle sterility [3, 5, 6]. later, RHB was present in the neighbouring countries The broad geographic distribution of RHB and its of Panama, Venezuela and Costa Rica, and had crossed capacity to breach extensive natural barriers, such as the the Caribbean Sea to reach Cuba and the Florida penin- Caribbean sea, were explained in 1957 when preliminary sula [3]. Within a decade, RHB was widely distributed investigations conducted in Cuba [7, 8] and Venezuela [9] throughout tropical and subtropical America, affecting associated the incidence of RHB with the presence of the http://www.cabi.org/cabreviews 2 Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources planthopper (Homoptera: Delphacidae) Sogata orizicola name (white leaf); stunting, panicle sterility and/or plant (Muir) in RHB-affected rice fields. Further testing of these death. Affected plants may show the disease symptoms in suspected vectors led to the conclusion that only Soga- some tillers, while other tillers remain symptomless. The todes orizicola was the vector of the causal agent of RHB panicles of diseased tillers are shorter and malformed, [10, 11]. In 1993, the taxonomy of this planthopper including the lemma and palea of florets that dry out and species was further reviewed to include it in the genus show a brownish discoloration [20]. Although disease Tagosodes, species orizicolus [12]. Rice planthoppers are incidence and severity were variable, some affected rice known long-distance fliers, capable of covering distances fields in the Cauca Valley had to be ploughed under in in excess of 1000 km without alighting [13]. Planthoppers 1958. Varieties such as Bluebonnet 50, Century Patna 231, are also proven vectors of different plant viruses affecting Early Prolific, Fortuna, Guayaquil, Lady Wright, Nato, plant species of the Gramineae, including rice, which Rexoro, Santa Maria and Zenith proved highly susceptible, suggested that RHB was caused by a virus [2, 14]. How- as well as many of the 2200 lines of the world collection of ever, the aetiology and epidemiology of RHB had to wait the US Department of Agriculture of the USA evaluated in almost half a century to be elucidated. Colombia, Cuba and Venezuela. A second group of 1725 One of the most puzzling characteristics of the RHB lines from the USA and FAO genebanks was also screened pathosystem is its erratic, ‘cyclical’ epidemic behaviour. in Cuba and Colombia. Of these field evaluations, about RHB caused significant (25–50%) yield losses in 1957– 400 resistant rice genotypes were identified in these 1964, just to fade away in the following 15 years (1965– collections, mainly belonging to short-grain japonica types 1980), and then re-emerge in full force from 1981 until from Japan, China, Korea and Taiwan [5, 6]. The main 1984 [1, 3, 15] (Peter R. Jennings, 2010, unpublished data). sources of resistance selected from the US collection The last outbreak of RHB in Colombia took place in were Gulfrose and Lacrosse (subtropical japonicas). 1996–1999. Considering that no hoja-blanca-resistant rice Disease incidence and severity seemed to depend on the varieties were available during those years, it became time of infection: with early infection (1–3 leaf stage) evident that the cyclical nature of the RHB epidemics resulting in higher incidence and disease severity [2, 21]. was more likely determined by the interaction between Based on these field evaluations conducted in 1956 the pathogen and the insect vector Tagosodes orizicolus and 1957, a breeding project was initiated in Palmira [7, 16, 17]. (Colombia) to transfer the resistance found in the japonica grain types to the susceptible long-grain, indica varieties preferred in tropical America. The Plant Host Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the second most extensive food The Insect Vector crop grown in the world (c. 159 million ha) after wheat and is the main food crop grown in the tropics. Half of the T. orizicolus (Muir), commonly referred to as ‘sogata’, has world’s population (over 3 billion people) depends on been consistently shown to be the vector of the causal rice, particularly in Asia, where annual per capita rice agent of RHB [7, 9, 10, 11]. A related planthopper species, consumption may be as high as 170 kg in countries such as T. cubanus, common in rice fields, can be experimentally Vietnam. Asia produces almost 90% of all the rice culti- forced to transmit the RHB agent from rice to its pre- vated in the world (141 million ha), mainly China and ferred wild host, Echinochloa colona (L.) Link, and from India, where rice domestication and cultivation seems to E. colona to E. colona under natural field conditions [22]. have started over 5000 years ago. Africa cultivates ap- The species T. orizicolus and T. cubanus (Homoptera: proximately 9.5 million ha, and the Americas 6.8 million ha Delphacidae) are restricted to tropical and subtropical of rice. Nevertheless, over half a billion people consume America, although T. cubanus has been reported from up to 43 kg of rice per year/per capita in Latin America West Africa as well [23]. However, the genus Tagosodes and the Caribbean, which demonstrates the importance appears to be of Asian origin [23, 24], as is the case with of this grain crop in the regional diet [18]. its main hosts, rice and E. colona [25]. Unlike the complex phytosanitary situation of rice in T. orizicolus was originally described by Muir [26] as Asia, where several viruses affect this grain crop, RHB was Sogata orizicola in 1926 from specimens collected in British the only viral disease of rice in the Americas until a new Guiana. The name Sogata brasilensis or brazilensis has also virus, Rice stripe necrosis virus (RSNV), emerged in South appeared in the early literature. In 1963, Fennah [27] America in 1991 [19]. However, the economic impor- changed the genus to Sogatodes, and Ishihara and Nasu tance of RSNV has been so far relatively negligible. On the [28] changed the spelling of the species name from orizi- contrary, the pathogenicity and severity of the causal cola to oryzicola. Finally, as mentioned above, the name of agent of RHB were apparent from the time this disease this planthopper species was changed to T. orizicolus in the was originally observed in the Cauca valley of Colombia. 1990s [12, 29]. T. cubanus was first described by Crawford Affected rice plants showed the characteristic yellowish, [30] as Dicranotropis cubanus from Cuban specimens. chlorotic stripes that often coalesce to give RHB its Other names used in the past to describe this species http://www.cabi.org/cabreviews F.J.
Recommended publications
  • Defense and Counter-Defense in Rice–Virus Interactions Jiaqi Qin, Ci Wang, Leqi Wang, Shanshan Zhao* and Jianguo Wu*
    Qin et al. Phytopathology Research (2019) 1:34 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42483-019-0041-7 Phytopathology Research REVIEW Open Access Defense and counter-defense in rice–virus interactions Jiaqi Qin, Ci Wang, Leqi Wang, Shanshan Zhao* and Jianguo Wu* Abstract Rice viruses, known as “rice killer”, are vector-borne pathogens that cause severe disease and significant yield loss in rice production around the world. Rice virus disease is characterized by uncontrolled virus replication and the activation of host responses that contribute to pathogenesis. Underlying these phenomena is the potent suppression of rice antiviral responses, particularly the RNA silencing pathway and plant hormone pathways, which play vital roles in antiviral immunity. Classical rice virus disease control strategies include chemotherapeutics and use of disease resistance rice varieties. Here, we summarize recent advances in understanding the mechanisms behind the immune evasion and rice viral pathogenesis. Based on these mechanistic insights, we discuss how to combine different strategies for maintaining the effectiveness of rice resistance to viruses, and propose theoretical basis for the next generation of virus-resistant rice plants. Keywords: Rice virus, Antiviral defense, Pathogenesis Background the biggest challenge is how to control rice virus dis- Rice is the most important crop in Asia and provides eases effectively and in an environmentally friendly staple food for half of the world’spopulation.Rice way. virus disease causes severe disease of rice in China Rice viruses are obligate intracellular parasites that and many other East Asia countries (Nicaise 2014). replicate, express viral proteins and establish infection Up to now, 17 rice virus diseases have been reported process in host cell.
    [Show full text]
  • Nilaparvata Lugens, Stal) Population Of
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2017; 5(5): 1445-1449 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Baseline susceptibility of sulfoxaflor 24 SC JEZS 2017; 5(5): 1445-1449 © 2017 JEZS insecticide on paddy brown planthopper, Received: 06-07-2017 Accepted: 07-08-2017 (Nilaparvata lugens, Stal) population of Mahantesh Kapasi Northeastern Karnataka Assistant Professor of Entomology, Agricultural College Kalaburagi, UAS, Raichur, Karnataka, India Mahantesh Kapasi, Bheemanna M, Guruprasad GS and Vijaykumar Ghante Bheemanna M Professor and Head, PRFQAL, UAS, Raichur, Abstract Karnataka, India Baseline susceptibility of sulfoxaflor 24 SC insecticide was investigated by collecting field populations of brown planthopper from different locations of northeastern Karnataka during 2014-15 and 2015-16. Guruprasad GS All the selected populations differed in their susceptibility to sulfoxaflor. In general, Gangavati and Scientist, ARS, Gangavati, Sindhanur BPH population recorded higher LC50 values of 29.95 and 27.75 ppm respectively, followed UAS, Raichur, Karnataka, India by Ballari (26.16 ppm), Manvi (25.03 ppm) and Devadurga (22.68 ppm). Lowest LC50 value was observed in population collected from Kembhavi (21.56 ppm) during 2014-15. The similar trend was Vijaykumar Ghante noticed during 2015-16 season. The comparison studies were made with dinotefuran 20 SG and Scientist, MARS, UAS, buprofezin 25 SC insecticides for a population collected from Gangavati. Raichur, Karnataka, India Keywords: Nilaparvata lugens, Insecticide resistance, baseline susceptibility and sulfoxaflor Introduction The brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) is continuing to be a serious pest of rice in Asia. In 1927 it was first time reported as sporadic pest on rice crop of Guntur district in Andhra Pradesh, India [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Multiplication of Maize Stripe Virus in Peregrinus Maidis
    Vector Relations Multiplication of Maize Stripe Virus in Peregrinusmaidis L. R. Nault and D. T. Gordon Professor, Department of Entomology, and professor, Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University (OSU), Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC), Wooster 44691. Submitted as Journal Article 147-87 by the OSU-OARDC. Salaries and research support were provided by state and federal funds appropriated to the OSU-OARDC. We gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Lakshman S. Negi, Marian Coffey, and Amy Juan Rubink in performing the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, W. E. Styer for the preparation of planthoppers and planthopper organs for assay, and N. H. Gordon for advice on the statistical analysis of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay data. Accepted for publication 26 February 1988. ABSTRACT Nault, L. R., and Gordon, D. T. 1988. Multiplication of maize stripe virus in Peregrinusmaidis. Phytopathology 78:991-995. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to bursa copulatrix, and single eggs of viruliferous females; and accessory demonstrate that the maize stripe virus (MStpV) multiplies in its delphacid gland and seminal vesicle of viruliferous males. In this last group, none of planthopper vector, Peregrinusmaidis. ELISAs were performed using an the 10 testes were found to be positive for MStpV by ELISA. In a time antiserum to purified MStpV. MStpV was detected by ELISA from a single course experiment, MStpV was detected by ELISA from the midgut and planthopper immediately after a 2-day acquisition access period (AAP) ovaries but not the salivary glands at 0 and 2 days after a 7-day AAP.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection and Transmission of Rice Stunt Virus on Ciherang and Situ Bagendit Varieties
    J.Helina HPT etTropika. al. Detection and Transmission of Rice StuntISSN: Virus 1411-7525 169 Vol. 18, No. 2, September 2018 E-ISSN: 2461-0399 Pages: 169–176 DOI : 10.23960/j.hptt.218169-176 DETECTION AND TRANSMISSION OF RICE STUNT VIRUS ON CIHERANG AND SITU BAGENDIT VARIETIES Selvi Helina1, Sri Sulandari1, Sedyo Hartono2, & Andi Trisyono2 1Department of Phytopathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia Jl. Flora No. 1 Bulaksumur Sleman Yogyakarta 55281 2Department of Plant Pests and Diseases, Faculty of Agriculture, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia Jl. Flora No. 1 Bulaksumur Sleman Yogyakarta 55281 E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Detection and Transmission of rice stunt virus on Ciherang and Situ Bagendit Varieties. The explosion of brown planthoppers recently has caused reduction of rice production in Indonesia. Brown planthoppers do not only act as pest, but also transmit Rice grassy stunt virus (RGSV) and Rice ragged stunt virus (RRSV). Detection of the existence of the two viruses in rice plants and vector insects is important to be done to ensure that the virus is infected with the vector. The aim of this research is to detect the existence of virus in varieties of Ciherang and Situ Bagendit as a result of transmission in the laboratory and to find out the ability of brown planthoppers to transmit stunt virus to both of the varieties. This research was compiled using Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 4 treatments, namely healthy rice plants of Ciherang and Situ Bagendit varieties, Ciherang and Situ Bagendit varieties which were infested by brown planthoppers each with 5 repetitions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Arabidopsis Pathosystem Reveals Cooperation of Multiple
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A novel Arabidopsis pathosystem reveals cooperation of multiple hormonal response-pathways in host resistance against the global crop destroyer Macrophomina phaseolina Mercedes M. Schroeder1, Yan Lai1,2, Miwa Shirai1, Natalie Alsalek1,3, Tokuji Tsuchiya 4, Philip Roberts5 & Thomas Eulgem 1* Dubbed as a “global destroyer of crops”, the soil-borne fungus Macrophomina phaseolina (Mp) infects more than 500 plant species including many economically important cash crops. Host defenses against infection by this pathogen are poorly understood. We established interactions between Mp and Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) as a model system to quantitatively assess host factors afecting the outcome of Mp infections. Using agar plate-based infection assays with diferent Arabidopsis genotypes, we found signaling mechanisms dependent on the plant hormones ethylene, jasmonic acid and salicylic acid to control host defense against this pathogen. By profling host transcripts in Mp-infected roots of the wild-type Arabidopsis accession Col-0 and ein2/jar1, an ethylene/jasmonic acid-signaling defcient mutant that exhibits enhanced susceptibility to this pathogen, we identifed hundreds of genes potentially contributing to a diverse array of defense responses, which seem coordinated by complex interplay between multiple hormonal response-pathways. Our results establish Mp/Arabidopsis interactions as a useful model pathosystem, allowing for application of the vast genomics-related resources of this versatile model plant to the systematic investigation of previously understudied host defenses against a major crop plant pathogen. Te broad host-spectrum pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina (Mp) is a devastating soil-borne fungus that infects more than 500 plant species1–5. Many of these hosts are economically important crop plants including maize, soybean, canola, cotton, peanut, sunfower and sugar cane5–10.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Pathogen Infection on Nitrogen Remobilization in Arabidopsis Thaliana
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2006 The Effects of Pathogen Infection on Nitrogen Remobilization in Arabidopsis thaliana Michelle Ann Boercker University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Boercker, Michelle Ann, "The Effects of Pathogen Infection on Nitrogen Remobilization in Arabidopsis thaliana. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2006. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1506 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Michelle Ann Boercker entitled "The Effects of Pathogen Infection on Nitrogen Remobilization in Arabidopsis thaliana." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. James Fordyce, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Nathan Sanders, Joe Williams Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Michelle Ann Boercker entitled “The Effects of Pathogen Infection on Nitrogen Remobilization in Arabidopsis thaliana.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Maize Stripe Tenuivirus1
    Plant Pathology Circular No. 363 Fla. Dept. Agric. & Consumer Services January/February 1994 Division of Plant Industry Maize Stripe Tenuivirus1 J. H. Tsai2 and L. G. Brown3 INTRODUCTION: Maize stripe is a severe viral disease of maize in the southern U. S., Central America, Africa, Australia, and several Pacific islands, and probably occurs in most tropical maize growing regions (Gingery 1985; Tsai and Zitter 1982). The first report of this disease in the Continental U.S. was in Florida in 1975 (Tsai 1975). A serious outbreak of a disease complex in maize occurred in south Florida from 1979-1980. At least five viral and two mollicute (mycoplasmas that lack a true cell wall) plant pathogens were involved in the outbreak. Maize stripe virus (MStV) was considered the most important component in the disease epidemic (Bradfute et al. 1981; Tsai and Falk 1988). SYMPTOMS AND HOST RANGE: Initial symptoms are fine chlorotic stipplings between leaf veins which later develop into continuous chlorotic stripes of varying width and intensity (Tsai 1975) (Fig. 1). Young plants infected at the 4- to 5-leaf stage often exhibit complete chlorosis on the emerging whorl leaf, and the center leaf usually remains folded and bent (Tsai 1975). The host range of MStV includes Zea spp., several Sorghum spp., and itchgrass (Rouboellia exaltata L.f.) (Greber 1983, Tsai and Falk 1988). Itchgrass is a noxious weed which was introduced into southern Florida from tropical Asia (Hitchock and Chase 1951). Figure 1. Maize stripe virus on Zea mays. Fine Chlorotic stipplings (left). Continuous chlorotic stripes (right). DISEASE DEVELOPMENT: MStV is transmitted by the corn delphacid, Peregrinus maidis (Ashmead) (Homoptera: Delphacidae) in a persistent-propagative manner (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of the Order Bunyavirales: Update 2019
    Archives of Virology (2019) 164:1949–1965 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-019-04253-6 VIROLOGY DIVISION NEWS Taxonomy of the order Bunyavirales: update 2019 Abulikemu Abudurexiti1 · Scott Adkins2 · Daniela Alioto3 · Sergey V. Alkhovsky4 · Tatjana Avšič‑Županc5 · Matthew J. Ballinger6 · Dennis A. Bente7 · Martin Beer8 · Éric Bergeron9 · Carol D. Blair10 · Thomas Briese11 · Michael J. Buchmeier12 · Felicity J. Burt13 · Charles H. Calisher10 · Chénchén Cháng14 · Rémi N. Charrel15 · Il Ryong Choi16 · J. Christopher S. Clegg17 · Juan Carlos de la Torre18 · Xavier de Lamballerie15 · Fēi Dèng19 · Francesco Di Serio20 · Michele Digiaro21 · Michael A. Drebot22 · Xiaˇoméi Duàn14 · Hideki Ebihara23 · Toufc Elbeaino21 · Koray Ergünay24 · Charles F. Fulhorst7 · Aura R. Garrison25 · George Fú Gāo26 · Jean‑Paul J. Gonzalez27 · Martin H. Groschup28 · Stephan Günther29 · Anne‑Lise Haenni30 · Roy A. Hall31 · Jussi Hepojoki32,33 · Roger Hewson34 · Zhìhóng Hú19 · Holly R. Hughes35 · Miranda Gilda Jonson36 · Sandra Junglen37,38 · Boris Klempa39 · Jonas Klingström40 · Chūn Kòu14 · Lies Laenen41,42 · Amy J. Lambert35 · Stanley A. Langevin43 · Dan Liu44 · Igor S. Lukashevich45 · Tāo Luò1 · Chuánwèi Lüˇ 19 · Piet Maes41 · William Marciel de Souza46 · Marco Marklewitz37,38 · Giovanni P. Martelli47 · Keita Matsuno48,49 · Nicole Mielke‑Ehret50 · Maria Minutolo3 · Ali Mirazimi51 · Abulimiti Moming14 · Hans‑Peter Mühlbach50 · Rayapati Naidu52 · Beatriz Navarro20 · Márcio Roberto Teixeira Nunes53 · Gustavo Palacios25 · Anna Papa54 · Alex Pauvolid‑Corrêa55 · Janusz T. Pawęska56,57 · Jié Qiáo19 · Sheli R. Radoshitzky25 · Renato O. Resende58 · Víctor Romanowski59 · Amadou Alpha Sall60 · Maria S. Salvato61 · Takahide Sasaya62 · Shū Shěn19 · Xiǎohóng Shí63 · Yukio Shirako64 · Peter Simmonds65 · Manuela Sironi66 · Jin‑Won Song67 · Jessica R. Spengler9 · Mark D. Stenglein68 · Zhèngyuán Sū19 · Sùróng Sūn14 · Shuāng Táng19 · Massimo Turina69 · Bó Wáng19 · Chéng Wáng1 · Huálín Wáng19 · Jūn Wáng19 · Tàiyún Wèi70 · Anna E.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look Into Bunyavirales Genomes: Functions of Non-Structural (NS) Proteins
    viruses Review A Look into Bunyavirales Genomes: Functions of Non-Structural (NS) Proteins Shanna S. Leventhal, Drew Wilson, Heinz Feldmann and David W. Hawman * Laboratory of Virology, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT 59840, USA; [email protected] (S.S.L.); [email protected] (D.W.); [email protected] (H.F.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-406-802-6120 Abstract: In 2016, the Bunyavirales order was established by the International Committee on Taxon- omy of Viruses (ICTV) to incorporate the increasing number of related viruses across 13 viral families. While diverse, four of the families (Peribunyaviridae, Nairoviridae, Hantaviridae, and Phenuiviridae) contain known human pathogens and share a similar tri-segmented, negative-sense RNA genomic organization. In addition to the nucleoprotein and envelope glycoproteins encoded by the small and medium segments, respectively, many of the viruses in these families also encode for non-structural (NS) NSs and NSm proteins. The NSs of Phenuiviridae is the most extensively studied as a host interferon antagonist, functioning through a variety of mechanisms seen throughout the other three families. In addition, functions impacting cellular apoptosis, chromatin organization, and transcrip- tional activities, to name a few, are possessed by NSs across the families. Peribunyaviridae, Nairoviridae, and Phenuiviridae also encode an NSm, although less extensively studied than NSs, that has roles in antagonizing immune responses, promoting viral assembly and infectivity, and even maintenance of infection in host mosquito vectors. Overall, the similar and divergent roles of NS proteins of these Citation: Leventhal, S.S.; Wilson, D.; human pathogenic Bunyavirales are of particular interest in understanding disease progression, viral Feldmann, H.; Hawman, D.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Poplars for Disease Resistance
    Breeding poplars , ' for 56 disease resistance . , ," . { " , .' ,./' -. .~. , FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Breeding poplars for disease resistance The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organilation of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. territory. city or area or of its authorities. or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. M-32 ISBN 92-5-102214-3 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced. stored in a retrieval system. or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic. mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright ·owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Publications Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. - iii - FOREWORD Poplars are amongst the oldest contemporary angiosperm genera with over 125 species recorded as fossils and 30 to 40 species ~xisting today.They are dioecious and are more frequently propagated from cuttings than seed, Lending themseLves to the creation of cLones and the cuLtivation of recognizabLe and cLonally reproducible hybrids. They have Long been cuLtivated in Asia as welL as in Europe but their more recent deveLopment dates from the 18th century when North American poplars were imported to form hybrids with European species, a trend which is now extending to West and East Asia. Their utiLity lies in ~he frequently rapid growth potentiaL of species, their hybrids and certain clones as weLL as the wide use to which popLars can be put to provide industriaL wood, fodder for animaLs, sheLter, energy and timber for domestic and farm use.
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts in Plant Disease Resistance
    REVISÃO / REVIEW CONCEPTS IN PLANT DISEASE RESISTANCE FRANCISCO XAVIER RIBEIRO DO VALE1, J. E. PARLEVLIET2 & LAÉRCIO ZAMBOLIM1 1Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, CEP 36571-000, Viçosa, MG, Brasil, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Department of Plant Breeding (IVP), Wageningen Agricultural University, P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ Wageningen, The Netherlands (Aceito para publicação em 13/08/2001) Autor para correspondência: Francisco Xavier Ribeiro do Vale RIBEIRO DO VALE, F.X., PARLEVLIET, J.E. & ZAMBOLIM, L. Concepts in plant disease resistance. Fitopatologia Brasileira 26:577- 589. 2001. ABSTRACT Resistance to nearly all pathogens occurs abundantly Race-specificity is not the cause of elusive resistance but the in our crops. Much of the resistance exploited by breeders is consequence of it. Understanding acquired resistance may of the major gene type. Polygenic resistance, although used open interesting approaches to control pathogens. This is even much less, is even more abundantly available. Many types of truer for molecular techniques, which already represent an resistance are highly elusive, the pathogen apparently adapting enourmously wide range of possibilities. Resistance obtained very easily them. Other types of resistance, the so-called through transformation is often of the quantitative type and durable resistance, remain effective much longer. The elusive may be durable in most cases. resistance is invariably of the monogenic type and usually of Key words: types of resistance; genetics of resistance; the hypersensitive type directed against specialised pathogens. acquired resistance. RESUMO Conceitos em resistência de plantas a doenças Na natureza a resistência à maioria das doenças ocorre tência durável. A resistência temporária é invariavelmente nas culturas.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems Approaches in Epidemiology and Plant Disease Managetnent
    Neth. J. Pl. Path. 99 (1993) Supplement 3: 161-171 Systems approaches in epidemiology and plant disease managetnent R. RABBINGE, W.A.H. ROSSING and W. VANDERWERF Department of Theoretical Production Ecology, Wageningen Agricultural University, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, the Netherlands Accepted 28 October 1993 Abstract This contribution to Zadoks' liber amicorum reviews the developments in quantitative epidemio­ logy during the last decades. It elucidates the progress in this field and shows how empirical crop protection with many phenomenological aspects transformed into a science-based (inter)discipline. The availability of experimental tools and the rapid development and introduction of computers enabled the application of systems approaches which stimulated a revolution in thinking and caused · a considerable improvement of strategic and tactical decision making in crop protection. Zadoks played a crucial role in that development. Additional keyll'ords: simulation, modelling, crop protection Introduction Zadaks' contrilmtionto l'jJidemiology and plant disease management From the time of his arrival in Wageningen in 1956, Zadoks contributed to the systems approach in crop protection. As a fresh scientific worker in crop protection, he was aware of the necessity to determine fundamental epidemiological parameters such as infectious period, latency period and spore production under well-defined conditions, to better understand epidemiology of plant pathogenic fungi under field situations. When he started as a professor at the university, he received a so-called bride's contribution of one million Dutch guilders, an unbelievable amount nowadays, to construct climate cabinets and climate rooms that allowed him to undertake these studies. Zadoks' studies of funda­ mental epidemiological parameters laid the basis for his quantitative understanding of stripe rust epidemics in the field.
    [Show full text]