DOCSLIB.ORG

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons Joseph C. Carmichael, M.D.1 • Deborah S. Keller, M.S., M.D.2 • Gabriele Baldini, M.D.3 Liliana Bordeianou, M.D.4 • Eric Weiss, M.D.5 • Lawrence Lee, M.D., Ph.D.6 Marylise Boutros, M.D.6 • James McClane, M.D.7 • Liane S. Feldman, M.D.6 Scott R. Steele, M.D.8 1 Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California 2 Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 3 Department of Anesthesiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 4 Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 5 Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Westin, Florida 6 Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 7 Norwalk Hospital, Western Connecticut Medical Group, Norwalk, Connecticut 8 Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio KEY WORDS: Colectomy; Enhanced recovery; Ileus; The ASCRS Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee is com- Proctectomy. posed of society members who are chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal his clinical practice guideline represents a collabora- surgery. In a collaborative effort, the ASCRS Clinical Practice tive effort between the American Society of Colon and Guidelines Committee and members of the SAGES Surgi- TRectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of Ameri- cal Multimodal Accelerated Recovery Trajectory Enhanced can Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Recovery Task Force and Guidelines Committee have joined together to produce this guideline, written and approved by All supplemental tables for these guidelines are available at this link: both societies. The combined ASCRS/SAGES panel worked https://tinyurl.com/CPG-Suppl-Tables. together to develop the statements in this guideline and ap- Financial Disclosure: The funding bodies (ASCRS and SAGES) did not in- proved these final recommendations. Through this effort, fluence the content of this work and no other specific funding was received the ASCRS and SAGES continue their dedication to ensur- from other entities. Dr Keller is a member of the Pacira Pharmaceuticals ing high-quality perioperative patient care. speaker’s bureau, and her institution has received unrestricted educational 1 grants from Pacira. Dr Feldman has received grant support from Medtronic Previous guidelines on perioperative care for colon and 2 and Merck. Dr Carmichael’s institution has received unrestricted educa- rectal surgery included studies identified up to January 2012 tional grant support for his work with Medtronic and Johnson & Johnson. with significant literature published since then. The com- bined ASCRS/SAGES committee was created to define cur- Liane S. Feldman and Scott R. Steele contributed equally to this article. rent best-quality care for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery. This clinical practice guideline is based on the This article is being published concurrently in Surgical Endoscopy. The arti- cles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping best available evidence. These guidelines are inclusive and with each journal’s style. Either citation can be used when citing this article. not prescriptive. Their purpose is to provide information on which decisions can be made rather than to dictate a specific Correspondence: Scott R. Steele, M.D., 9500 Euclid Ave/A30, Cleveland form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44915. E-mail: [email protected] of all practitioners, healthcare workers, and patients who de- Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60: 761–784 sire information about the management of the conditions DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000883 addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. It should © The ASCRS 2017 be recognized that these guidelines should not be deemed in- DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM VOLUME 60: 8 (2017) 761 Copyright © The American Society of Colon & Rectal Surgeons, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. 762 CARMICHAEL ET AL: GUIDELINE FOR ENHANCED RECOVERY clusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of methods METHODOLOGY of care reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any spe- Members of the SAGES and ASCRS Practice Guidelines cific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all Committee worked in joint production of these guidelines from inception to final publication. Final recommenda- of the circumstances presented by the individual patient. tions were approved by each society’s committee and ex- ecutive council. These guidelines were built following a STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM standardized algorithm for the creation of all of our clini- cal practice guidelines, which included: search for existing Contemporary colorectal surgery is often associated with long guidelines, formulation of key questions, a systematic re- length of stay (8 days for open surgery and 5 days for laparo- view of the literature, selection and appraisal of the quality 3 3 scopic surgery), high cost, and rates of surgical site infec- of the evidence, development of clear recommendations, 4 tion approaching 20%. During the hospital stay for elective and drafting of the guideline. The details of specific search colorectal surgery, the incidence of perioperative nausea and strategies, including search terms, inclusion criteria, exclu- vomiting (PONV) may be as high as 80% in patients with sion criteria, total number of studies identified, and tables certain risk factors.5 After discharge from colorectal surgery, of evidence for each statement, are available in the supple- readmission rates have been noted as high as 35.4%.6 ments, but all of the search strategies involved an organized An enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) is a set of standard- search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane ized perioperative procedures and practices that is applied to all Database of Collected Reviews using a variety of key word patients undergoing a given elective surgery. In general, these combinations (for details on key words and search strate- protocols are not intended for emergent cases, but components gies see https://tinyurl.com/CPG-Suppl-Tables). System- of them certainly could apply to the emergent/urgent patient. atic searches were conducted from 1990 to 2016 and were Also known as fast-track protocols or enhanced recovery after restricted to English-language articles. Directed searches surgery (ERAS)1 protocols, the content of these specific proto- of the embedded references from the primary articles were cols may vary significantly, but all are designed as a means to also performed in certain circumstances. Prospective ran- improve patient outcomes. Outcomes of interest to patients and domized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses were providers include freedom from nausea, freedom from pain at given preference in developing these guidelines. After all rest, early return of bowel function, improved wound healing, of the searches were complete, a total of 12,483 citations and early hospital discharge.7 Although numerous periopera- had been identified for title/abstract review, and 764 of tive protocols currently exist, this clinical practice guideline will those articles were selected for extensive review and placed evaluate the strength of evidence in support of measures to im- into evidence tables with ranking of the evidence based prove patient recovery after elective colon and rectal resections. on quality of the research by 2 independent reviewers (see A 2011 Cochrane review found that ERPs were associ- Tables S1–S14, https://tinyurl.com/CPG-Suppl-Tables). ated with a reduction in overall complications and length The final grade of recommendation was performed using of stay when compared with conventional perioperative the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, patient management.8 Subsequent studies have shown Development, and Evaluation system outlined previously that ERPs are associated with reduced healthcare costs and by the American College of Chest Physicians (Table 1).14 improved patient satisfaction.4 ERPs are also associated Previous guidelines on perioperative care for colon1 and with improved outcomes regardless of whether patients rectal2 surgery included studies identified up to January undergo laparoscopic or open surgery.9 Studies have also 2012, with significant literature published since then. shown that ERPs cannot simply be implemented and for- gotten but require a continued audit process in place to guide compliance and to continue to improve quality.10–13 PREOPERATIVE INTERVENTIONS There are many different preoperative, intraoperative, A. Preadmission Counseling and postoperative components in a typical ERP, and it is dif- 1. A preoperative discussion of milestones and discharge ficult to identify which are the most beneficial components criteria should typically be performed with the patient of the bundle of measures, because they are generally all before surgery. Grade of recommendation: strong rec- implemented simultaneously. However, one retrospective ommendation based on low-quality evidence, 1C. review of 8 years of compliance with an ERP identified these Standardized discharge criteria
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hepatic Surgery
    Hepatic Surgery Honorary Editors: Tan To Cheung, Long R. Jiao Editors: Zhiming Wang, Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri, Alexander Parikh Associate Editors: Yiming Tao, Michael D. Kluger, Romaric Loffroy Editors: Zhiming Wang, Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri, Levi Battista Giovanni Alexander Parikh Hepatic Surgery Honorary Editors: Tan To Cheung, Long R. Jiao Editors: Zhiming Wang, Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri, Alexander Parikh Associate Editors: Yiming Tao, Michael D. Kluger, Romaric Loffroy AME Publishing Company Room C 16F, Kings Wing Plaza 1, NO. 3 on Kwan Street, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong Information on this title: www.amegroups.com For more information, contact [email protected] Copyright © AME Publishing Company. All rights reserved. This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of AME Publishing Company. First published in 2018 Printed in China by AME Publishing Company Editors: Zhiming Wang, Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri, Alexander Parikh Hepatic Surgery (Hard Cover) ISBN: 978-988-78919-1-8 AME Publishing Company, Hong Kong AME Publishing Company has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. The advice and opinions expressed in this book are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or practices of the publisher. No representation is made by the publisher about the suitability of the information contained in this book, and there is no consent, endorsement or recommendation provided by the publisher, express or implied, with regard to its contents.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Clinical Practice
    CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Constipation Ian M. Paquette, M.D. • Madhulika Varma, M.D. • Charles Ternent, M.D. Genevieve Melton-Meaux, M.D. • Janice F. Rafferty, M.D. • Daniel Feingold, M.D. Scott R. Steele, M.D. he American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons for functional constipation include at least 2 of the fol- is dedicated to assuring high-quality patient care lowing symptoms during ≥25% of defecations: straining, Tby advancing the science, prevention, and manage- lumpy or hard stools, sensation of incomplete evacuation, ment of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage, relying on anus. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee is com- manual maneuvers to promote defecation, and having less posed of Society members who are chosen because they than 3 unassisted bowel movements per week.7,8 These cri- XXX have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and teria include constipation related to the 3 common sub- rectal surgery. This committee was created to lead inter- types: colonic inertia or slow transit constipation, normal national efforts in defining quality care for conditions re- transit constipation, and pelvic floor or defecation dys- lated to the colon, rectum, and anus. This is accompanied function. However, in reality, many patients demonstrate by developing Clinical Practice Guidelines based on the symptoms attributable to more than 1 constipation sub- best available evidence. These guidelines are inclusive and type and to constipation-predominant IBS, as well. The not prescriptive.
    [Show full text]
  • OT Resource for K9 Overview of Surgical Procedures
    OT Resource for K9 Overview of surgical procedures Prepared by: Hannah Woolley Stage Level 1 2 Gynecology/Oncology Surgeries Lymphadenectomy (lymph node dissection) Surgical removal of lymph nodes Radical: most/all of the lymph nodes in tumour area are removed Regional: some of the lymph nodes in the tumour area are removed Omentectomy Surgical procedure to remove the omentum (thin abdominal tissue that encases the stomach, large intestine and other abdominal organs) Indications for omenectomy: Ovarian cancer Sometimes performed in combination with TAH/BSO Posterior Pelvic Exenteration Surgical removal of rectum, anus, portion of the large intestine, ovaries, fallopian tubes and uterus (partial or total removal of the vagina may also be indicated) Indications for pelvic exenteration Gastrointestinal cancer (bowel, colon, rectal) Gynecological cancer (cervical, vaginal, ovarian, vulvar) Radical Cystectomy Surgical removal of the whole bladder and proximal lymph nodes In men, prostate gland is also removed In women, ovaries and uterus may also be removed Following surgery: Urostomy (directs urine through a stoma on the abdomen) Recto sigmoid pouch/Mainz II pouch (segment of the rectum and sigmoid colon used to provide anal urinary diversion) 3 Radical Vulvectomy Surgical removal of entire vulva (labia, clitoris, vestibule, introitus, urethral meatus, glands/ducts) and surrounding lymph nodes Indication for radical vulvectomy Treatment of vulvar cancer (most common) Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection (SLND) Exploratory procedure where the sentinel lymph node is removed and examined to determine if there is lymph node involvement in patients diagnosed with cancer (commonly breast cancer) Total abdominal hysterectomy/bilateral saplingo-oophorectomy (TAH/BSO) Surgical removal of the uterus (including cervix), both fallopian tubes and ovaries Indications for TAH/BSO: Uterine fibroids: benign growths in the muscle of the uterus Endometriosis: condition where uterine tissue grows on structures outside the uterus (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Gut Microbiota and Colon Diseases with a Focus on Adenomatous Colon Polyps
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review An Overview of Gut Microbiota and Colon Diseases with a Focus on Adenomatous Colon Polyps Oana Lelia Pop 1 , Dan Cristian Vodnar 1 , Zorita Diaconeasa 1 , Magdalena Istrati 2, 3 4 1, Adriana Bint, int, an , Vasile Virgil Bint, int, an , Ramona Suharoschi * and Rosita Gabbianelli 5,* 1 Department of Food Science, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; [email protected] (O.L.P.); [email protected] (D.C.V.); [email protected] (Z.D.) 2 Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology “Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor”, 400158 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; [email protected] 3 1st Medical Clinic, Department of Gastroenterology, Emergency County Hospital, 400006 Cluj Napoca, Romania; [email protected] 4 1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj Napoca, 400006 Cluj Napoca, Romania; [email protected] 5 Unit of Molecular Biology, School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, Via Gentile III da Varano, 62032 Camerino, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.S.); [email protected] (R.G.) Received: 6 August 2020; Accepted: 2 October 2020; Published: 5 October 2020 Abstract: It is known and accepted that the gut microbiota composition of an organism has an impact on its health. Many studies deal with this topic, the majority discussing gastrointestinal health. Adenomatous colon polyps have a high prevalence as colon cancer precursors, but in many cases, they are hard to diagnose in their early stages. Gut microbiota composition correlated with the presence of adenomatous colon polyps may be a noninvasive and efficient tool for diagnosis with a high impact on human wellbeing and favorable health care costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Patients Having a Sigmoid Colectomy
    Patient information – Pre-operative Assessment Clinic Information for patients having a sigmoid colectomy This leaflet will explain what will happen when you come to the hospital for your operation. It is important that you understand what to expect and feel able to take an active role in your treatment. Your surgeon will have already discussed your treatment with you and will give advice about what to do when you get home. What is a sigmoid colectomy? This operation involves removing the sigmoid colon, which lies on the left side of your abdominal cavity (tummy). We would then normally join the remaining left colon to the top of the rectum (the ‘storage’ organ of the bowel). The lines on the attached diagram show the piece of bowel being removed. This operation is done with you asleep (general anaesthetic). The operation not only removes the bowel containing the tumour but also removes the draining lymph glands from this part of the bowel. This is sent to the pathologists who will then analyse each bit of the bowel and the lymph glands in detail under the microscope. This operation can often be completed in a ‘keyhole’ manner, which means less trauma to the abdominal muscles, as the biggest wound is the one to remove the bowel from the abdomen. Sometimes, this is not possible, in which case the same operation is done through a bigger incision in the abdominal wall – this is called an ‘open’ operation. It does take longer to recover with an open operation but, if it is necessary, it is the safest thing to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Laparoscopic Hand-Sewn Duodenal Switch. Video
    Baltasar A., BMI-2012, 2.1.4 (11-13) February 2012 OA Laparoscopic Hand-sewn Duodenal Switch. Video Aniceto Baltasar, *Rafael Bou, Marcelo Bengochea, *Carlos Serra, *Nieves Pérez San Jorge Clinic and *Hospital “Virgen de los Lirios”. Cid 61.Alcoy. Alicante. Spain. Phone (0034) 965.332.536. [email protected] Key Words: Laparoscopic Duodenal Switch; Bilio Pancreatic Diversion; Gastric Sleeve; Obesity surgery Introduction The Duodenal Switch (DS) is one alternative to the Scopinaro Bilio-Pancreatic Diversion (BPD). Hess [1] performed the first open case in March 1988 (in a male BMI-60 and he was BMI-29 17 years later) and Marceau [2] made the first publication. Baltasar [3.4] increased the statistics. Rabkin [5] performed the first Fig.1. LapDS Fig.2. Ports positions Lap DS (LDS) hand-assisted for the duodeno-ileum anastomosis in August 1999, Gagner [6] the first fully LDS in September the same year and Baltasar [7.8] published the second world experience. Three surgeons perform the operation SA is in between the legs, SB in on the right side and SC on the LDS consist of 1) Vertical Gastric Sleeve (VGS) with right side through 6 ports. Direct vision approach is pyloric preservation of less than 60 cc and 2) A BPD always used for the first port (1P) with an Ethicon with a Common Channel (CC) of 65-100 cm, an Endopath#12 on the lateral border of the right rectus Alimentary Loop (AL) of 235-300 cm and the muscle, 3-4 fingerbreadths below the right costal remaining Bilio-Pancreatic Loop (BPL) as the margin.
    [Show full text]
  • Punctuation Guide
    Punctuation guide 1. The uses of punctuation Punctuation is an art, not a science, and a sentence can often be punctuated correctly in more than one way. It may also vary according to style: formal academic prose, for instance, might make more use of colons, semicolons, and brackets and less of full stops, commas, and dashes than conversational or journalistic prose. But there are some conventions you will need to follow if you are to write clear and elegant English. In earlier periods of English, punctuation was often used rhetorically—that is, to represent the rhythms of the speaking voice. The main function of modern English punctuation, however, is logical: it is used to make clear the grammatical structure of the sentence, linking or separating groups of ideas and distinguishing what is important in the sentence from what is subordinate. It can also be used to break up a long sentence into more manageable units, but this may only be done where a logical break occurs; Jane Austen's sentence ‗No one who had ever seen Catherine Morland in her infancy, would ever have supposed her born to be a heroine‘ would now lose its comma, since there is no logical break between subject and verb (compare: ‗No one would have supposed …‘). 2. The main stops and their functions The full stop, exclamation mark, and question mark are used to mark off separate sentences. Within the sentence, the colon (:) and semicolon (;) are stronger marks of division than the comma, brackets, and the dash. Properly used, the stops can be a very effective method of marking off the divisions and subdivisions of your argument; misused, they can make it barely intelligible, as in this example: ‗Donne starts the poem by poking fun at the Petrarchan convention; the belief that one's mistress's scorn could make one physically ill, he carries this one step further…‘.
    [Show full text]
  • Punctuation: Program 8-- the Semicolon, Colon, and Dash
    C a p t i o n e d M e d i a P r o g r a m #9994 PUNCTUATION: PROGRAM 8-- THE SEMICOLON, COLON, AND DASH FILMS FOR THE HUMANITIES & SCIENCES, 2000 Grade Level: 8-13+ 22 mins. DESCRIPTION How does a writer use a semicolon, colon, or dash? A semicolon is a bridge that joins two independent clauses with the same basic idea or joins phrases in a series. To elaborate a sentence with further information, use a colon to imply “and here it is!” The dash has no specific rules for use; it generally introduces some dramatic element into the sentence or interrupts its smooth flow. Clear examples given. ACADEMIC STANDARDS Subject Area: Language Arts–Writing • Standard: Uses grammatical and mechanical conventions in written compositions Benchmark: Uses conventions of punctuation in written compositions (e.g., uses commas with nonrestrictive clauses and contrasting expressions, uses quotation marks with ending punctuation, uses colons before extended quotations, uses hyphens for compound adjectives, uses semicolons between independent clauses, uses dashes to break continuity of thought) (See INSTRUCTIONAL GOALS 1-4.) INSTRUCTIONAL GOALS 1. To explain the proper use of a semicolon to combine independent clauses and in lists with commas. 2. To show the correct use of colons for combining information and in sentence fragments. 3. To illustrate the use of a dash in sentences. 4. To show some misuses of the semicolon, colon, and dash. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The semicolon, colon, and dash are among the punctuation marks most neglected by students and, sad to say, teachers. However, professional writers—and proficient writers in business—use them all to good effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Mucocele of the Appendix - Appendectomy Or Colectomy?
    Original Article Mucocele of the appendix - appendectomy or colectomy? JANDUÍ GOMES DE ABREU FILHO1, ERIVALDO FERNANDES DE LIRA1 1Service of Coloproctology of Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal (HBDF), Secretariat of Health in Distrito Federal - Brasília (DF), Brazil. FILHO JGDA; LIRA EFD. Mucocele of the appendix - appendectomy or colectomy? Rev bras Coloproct, 2011;31(3): 276-284. ABSTRACT: Mucocele of the appendix is a rare disease. It can be triggered by benign or malignant diseases, which cause the obstruc- tion of the appendix and the consequent accumulation of mucus secretion. The preoperative diagnosis is difficult due to non-specific clinical manifestations of the disease. Imaging tests can suggest the diagnosis. The treatment is always surgical and depends on the integrity and size of the appendix base and on the histological type of the original lesion. The prognosis is good in cases of integrity of the appendix. The perforation of the appendix and subsequent extravasation of its contents into the abdominal cavity may lead to pseudomyxoma peritonei, which has very poor prognosis if not treated properly. Keywords: mucocele; appendix; pseudomyxoma peritonei; treatment. INTRODUCTION first one defends the right colectomy as a treatment9, and the second one recommends only appendecto- The mucocele of the appendix was first de- my10. Despite the different adopted conducts, in both scribed in 1842 by Rokitansky1. This disease is reported cases a cystadenoma was diagnosed in the considered as a rare lesion of the appendix, which appendix; the choice was for elective surgery. is found in 0.2 to 0.3% of the appendectomies2. It The objective of this review is to analyze liter- is characterized by the dilation of the organ lumen ature as to mucocele, especially regarding diagnosis with mucus accumulation, being more frequent and treatment, besides discussing follow-up and prog- among individuals aged 50 years or more3,4.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Oral Anticoagulants Use in the Setting of Bariatric Surgery and Feeding Tubes Excellence.Acforum.Org
    Rapid Resource Direct Oral Anticoagulants Use in the Setting of Bariatric Surgery and Feeding Tubes excellence.acforum.org ACE Rapid Resources are not informed practice guidelines; they are Anticoagulation Forum, Inc.’s best recommendations based on (DOACs) NOTES current knowledge, and no warranty or guaranty is expressed or implied. The content provided is for informational purposes for medical • DOACs are absorbed at various professionals only and is not intended to be used or relied upon by them as specific medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment, the locations throughout the determination of which remains the responsibility of the medical professionals for their patients. gastrointestinal tract. Bariatric Surgery (See Table 1) • Bariatric surgery results in weight FIGURE 1 – Types of Bariatric Surgery loss by reducing stomach volume (which results in a more alkaline pH) A B C D and/or reducing effective intestinal surface area which results in malabsorption. • There is very little evidence regarding safety and efficacy of DOACs in patients with a history of bariatric surgery or requiring DOAC administration via a feeding tube. A. Adjustable gastric banding (AGB): Adjustable silicone band placed around stomach to create a smaller pouch. • This document was compiled utilizing current literature incorporating case B. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): reports, package inserts, and Stomach stapled to form gastric pouch that connects to distal jejunum, excluding the duodenum and proximal jejunum. pharmacokinetic studies as no current C. Gastrectomy (partial or total): randomized controlled trials are Sleeve gastrectomy results in longitudinal resection of 80% of stomach. available. As always, clinical judgment D. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS): and a shared decision making Gastric pouch reattached more distally to terminal ileum resulting in considerable reduction in absorptive surface approach should be utilized.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Procedure Offers a Less Invasive Alternative to Colectomy
    The better way to get better Hybrid procedure offers a less invasive alternative to colectomy Insufflation gas provides important advantage The colonoscopy-laparoscopy procedure is made possible through the combined skills of the gastroenterologist and laparoscopic surgeon, and the use of CO2 rather than ambient air for insufflation — the introduction of gas into the colon to improve visibility. CO2 is more quickly absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract and results in less bowel distension, giving the laparoscopic surgeon a better field of vision within the abdominal cavity. © Copyright Olympus. Used with permission. “Some patients who would have required a bowel resection can instead benefit from this A new, minimally invasive procedure that is a hybrid of colonoscopy and less invasive procedure. We’re laparoscopy is proving to be a safe and effective alternative to open colectomy using this combined technique (removal of part of the colon) for patients with benign colon polyps that are as a way for patients to avoid colectomy,” explains James not removable endoscopically. Yoo, M.D., a colorectal surgeon Patients who undergo this hybrid procedure experience less pain and often go at UCLA. “This procedure home after only one or two days. Scarring and wound complications are minimal involves tiny incisions for the as the laparoscopic surgeon makes only small, keyhole incisions in the abdomen laparoscopic instruments and patients stay in the hospital only rather than the long incision characteristic of a traditional colectomy. a day or two.” WWW.UCLAHEALTH.ORG 1-800-UCLA-MD1 (1-800-825-2631) Who can benefit from the procedure? Participating When a routine colonoscopy reveals polyps, they are usually removed at the Physicians time of the procedure as a precaution against their progression to cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • DDSI Week 2019 Brochure
    DDSI WEEK 2019 Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute Week 30th Anniversary Jagelman 40th Anniversary Turnbull International Colorectal Disease Symposium February 14-16, 2019 Marriott Harbor Beach Resort & Spa Fort Lauderdale, Florida 3rd Annual Pelvic Dissection taTME Cadaver Lab February 13, 2019 | M.A.R.C., Coral Gables, Florida Get your CME and MOC Points (ABS & ABIM) Call for Abstracts Deadline: November 15, 2018 8th Annual Gastroenterology and Hepatology Symposium February 14-16, 2019 Marriott Harbor Beach Resort & Spa Fort Lauderdale, Florida REGISTER ONLINE AT www.ccfcme.org/DDSI-Week 30th Anniversary Jagelman / 40th Anniversary Turnbull International Colorectal Disease Symposium February 14-16, 2019 #ccfcrs19 3rd Annual Pelvic Dissection taTME Cadaver Lab #ddsiweek19 February 13, 2019 Please join us as we celebrate our 30th Anniversary Who Should Attend? David G. Jagelman MD / 40th Anniversary Rupert Physicians, residents, fellows, nurses, wound care B. Turnbull MD International Colorectal Disease professionals, physician assistants, and allied health Symposium as part of our annual Digestive Disease professionals specializing in colorectal surgery, general and Surgery Institute Week (DDSI). This internationally surgery, laparoscopic surgery, endoscopic surgery and acclaimed gathering of surgeons from around the world gastroenterology. will be held from February 14-16, 2019 at the newly remodeled Marriott Harbor Beach Resort & Spa in Fort Lauderdale. This special anniversary course is paying Sessions tribute to the more than 1,000 surgeons from the USA Wednesday, Feb 13 and virtually every other country who have trained 3rd Annual Pelvic Dissection taTME Cadaver Lab as clinicians and/or researchers at Cleveland Clinic, Location: M.A.R.C. (Miami Anatomical Research in Florida and/or in Ohio.
    [Show full text]