DOCSLIB.ORG

Turbulence, Entropy and Dynamics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Turbulence, Entropy and Dynamics TURBULENCE, ENTROPY AND DYNAMICS Lecture Notes, UPC 2014 Jose M. Redondo Contents 1 Turbulence 1 1.1 Features ................................................ 2 1.2 Examples of turbulence ........................................ 3 1.3 Heat and momentum transfer ..................................... 4 1.4 Kolmogorov’s theory of 1941 ..................................... 4 1.5 See also ................................................ 6 1.6 References and notes ......................................... 6 1.7 Further reading ............................................ 7 1.7.1 General ............................................ 7 1.7.2 Original scientific research papers and classic monographs .................. 7 1.8 External links ............................................. 7 2 Turbulence modeling 8 2.1 Closure problem ............................................ 8 2.2 Eddy viscosity ............................................. 8 2.3 Prandtl’s mixing-length concept .................................... 8 2.4 Smagorinsky model for the sub-grid scale eddy viscosity ....................... 8 2.5 Spalart–Allmaras, k–ε and k–ω models ................................ 9 2.6 Common models ........................................... 9 2.7 References ............................................... 9 2.7.1 Notes ............................................. 9 2.7.2 Other ............................................. 9 3 Reynolds stress equation model 10 3.1 Production term ............................................ 10 3.2 Pressure-strain interactions ...................................... 10 3.3 Dissipation term ........................................... 10 3.4 Diffusion term ............................................ 10 3.5 Pressure-strain correlation term .................................... 10 3.6 Rotational term ............................................ 11 3.7 Advantages of RSM .......................................... 11 3.8 Disadvantages of RSM ........................................ 11 3.9 See also ................................................ 11 i ii CONTENTS 3.10 See also ................................................ 11 3.11 References ............................................... 11 3.12 Bibliography .............................................. 11 4 Boundary layer 12 4.1 Aerodynamics ............................................. 12 4.2 Naval architecture ........................................... 13 4.3 Boundary layer equations ....................................... 13 4.4 Turbulent boundary layers ....................................... 14 4.5 Heat and mass transfer ........................................ 14 4.6 Convective transfer constants from boundary layer analysis ...................... 15 4.7 Boundary layer turbine ........................................ 16 4.8 See also ................................................ 16 4.9 References ............................................... 17 4.10 External links ............................................. 17 5 Similitude (model) 18 5.1 Overview ............................................... 18 5.2 An example .............................................. 19 5.3 Typical applications .......................................... 19 5.4 Notes ................................................. 20 5.5 See also ................................................ 20 5.6 References .............................................. 20 5.7 External links ............................................. 20 6 Lagrangian and Eulerian specification of the flow field 21 6.1 Description .............................................. 21 6.2 Substantial derivative ......................................... 21 6.3 See also ................................................ 22 6.4 Notes ................................................. 22 6.5 References ............................................... 22 7 Lagrangian mechanics 23 7.1 Conceptual framework ........................................ 23 7.1.1 Generalized coordinates .................................... 23 7.1.2 D'Alembert’s principle and generalized forces ........................ 24 7.1.3 Kinetic energy relations .................................... 24 7.1.4 Lagrangian and action ..................................... 25 7.1.5 Hamilton’s principle of stationary action ........................... 25 7.2 Lagrange equations of the first kind .................................. 26 7.3 Lagrange equations of the second kind ................................ 26 7.3.1 Euler–Lagrange equations ................................... 26 7.3.2 Derivation of Lagrange’s equations .............................. 26 CONTENTS iii 7.3.3 Dissipation function ...................................... 27 7.3.4 Examples ........................................... 27 7.4 Extensions of Lagrangian mechanics ................................. 29 7.5 See also ................................................ 30 7.6 References ............................................... 30 7.7 Further reading ............................................ 30 7.8 External links ............................................. 31 8 Hamiltonian mechanics 32 8.1 Overview ............................................... 32 8.1.1 Basic physical interpretation ................................. 32 8.1.2 Calculating a Hamiltonian from a Lagrangian ........................ 32 8.2 Deriving Hamilton’s equations ..................................... 33 8.3 As a reformulation of Lagrangian mechanics ............................. 33 8.4 Geometry of Hamiltonian systems .................................. 34 8.5 Generalization to quantum mechanics through Poisson bracket .................... 34 8.6 Mathematical formalism ........................................ 35 8.7 Riemannian manifolds ......................................... 35 8.8 Sub-Riemannian manifolds ...................................... 36 8.9 Poisson algebras ............................................ 36 8.10 Charged particle in an electromagnetic field .............................. 36 8.11 Relativistic charged particle in an electromagnetic field ........................ 36 8.12 See also ................................................ 37 8.13 References ............................................... 37 8.13.1 Footnotes ........................................... 37 8.13.2 Sources ............................................ 37 8.14 External links ............................................. 37 9 Classical mechanics 38 9.1 History ................................................. 39 9.2 Description of the theory ....................................... 40 9.2.1 Position and its derivatives .................................. 41 9.2.2 Forces; Newton’s second law ................................. 42 9.2.3 Work and energy ....................................... 43 9.2.4 Beyond Newton’s laws .................................... 43 9.3 Limits of validity ........................................... 43 9.3.1 The Newtonian approximation to special relativity ...................... 44 9.3.2 The classical approximation to quantum mechanics ..................... 44 9.4 Branches ................................................ 44 9.5 See also ................................................ 45 9.6 Notes ................................................. 45 9.7 References ............................................... 45 iv CONTENTS 9.8 Further reading ............................................ 45 9.9 External links ............................................. 46 10 Entropy (information theory) 47 10.1 Introduction .............................................. 47 10.2 Definition ............................................... 48 10.3 Example ................................................ 48 10.4 Rationale ............................................... 49 10.5 Aspects ................................................ 49 10.5.1 Relationship to thermodynamic entropy ........................... 49 10.5.2 Entropy as information content ................................ 50 10.5.3 Data compression ....................................... 50 10.5.4 World’s technological capacity to store and communicate entropic information ....... 51 10.5.5 Limitations of entropy as information content ........................ 51 10.5.6 Limitations of entropy as a measure of unpredictability ................... 51 10.5.7 Data as a Markov process ................................... 52 10.5.8 b-ary entropy ......................................... 52 10.6 Efficiency ............................................... 52 10.7 Characterization ............................................ 52 10.7.1 Continuity ........................................... 52 10.7.2 Symmetry ........................................... 53 10.7.3 Maximum ........................................... 53 10.7.4 Additivity ........................................... 53 10.8 Further properties ........................................... 53 10.9 Extending discrete entropy to the continuous case ........................... 54 10.9.1 Differential entropy ...................................... 54 10.9.2 Relative entropy ........................................ 54 10.10Use in combinatorics ......................................... 55 10.10.1 Loomis-Whitney inequality .................................. 55 10.10.2 Approximation to binomial coefficient ............................ 55 10.11See also ................................................ 55 10.12References ............................................... 56
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dirac Brackets in Geometric Dynamics Annales De L’I
    ANNALES DE L’I. H. P., SECTION A JEDRZEJ S´ NIATYCKI Dirac brackets in geometric dynamics Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 20, no 4 (1974), p. 365-372 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1974__20_4_365_0> © Gauthier-Villars, 1974, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam. org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Section A : Vol. XX, n° 4, 1974, 365 Physique théorique. Dirac brackets in geometric dynamics Jedrzej 015ANIATYCKI The University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Department of Mathematics Statistics and Computing Science ABSTRACT. - Theory of constraints in dynamics is formulated in the framework of symplectic geometry. Geometric significance of secondary constraints and of Dirac brackets is given. Global existence of Dirac brackets is proved. 1. INTRODUCTION The successes of the canonical quantization of dynamical systems with a finite number of degrees of freedom, the experimental necessity of quan- tization of electrodynamics, and the hopes that quantization of the gravi- tational field could resolve difficulties encountered in quantum field theory have given rise to thorough investigation of the canonical structure of field theories. It has been found that the standard Hamiltonian formu- lation of dynamics is inadequate in the physically most interesting cases of electrodynamics and gravitation due to existence of constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • Strocchi's Quantum Mechanics
    Strocchi’s Quantum Mechanics: An alternative formulation to the dominant one? Antonino Drago ‒ Formerly at Naples University “Federico II”, Italy ‒ drago@un ina.it Abstract: At first glance, Strocchi’s formulation presents several characteri- stic features of a theory whose two choices are the alternative ones to the choices of the paradigmatic formulation: i) Its organization starts from not axioms, but an operative basis and it is aimed to solve a problem (i.e. the indeterminacy); moreover, it argues through both doubly negated proposi- tions and an ad absurdum proof; ii) It put, before the geometry, a polyno- mial algebra of bounded operators; which may pertain to constructive Mathematics. Eventually, it obtains the symmetries. However one has to solve several problems in order to accurately re-construct this formulation according to the two alternative choices. I conclude that rather than an al- ternative to the paradigmatic formulation, Strocchi’s represents a very inter- esting divergence from it. Keywords: Quantum Mechanics, C*-algebra approach, Strocchi’s formula- tion, Two dichotomies, Constructive Mathematics, Non-classical Logic 1. Strocchi’s Axiomatic of the paradigmatic formulation and his criticisms to it Segal (1947) has suggested a foundation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) on an algebraic approach of functional analysis; it is independent from the space-time variables or any other geometrical representation, as instead a Hilbert space is. By defining an algebra of the observables, it exploits Gelfand-Naimark theorem in order to faithfully represent this algebra into Hilbert space and hence to obtain the Schrödinger representation of QM. In the 70’s Emch (1984) has reiterated this formulation and improved it.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information For
    Supplementary Information for Vertical Angular Momentum Constraint on Lunar Formation and Orbital History ZhenLiang Tian and Jack Wisdom Z. Tian, J. Wisdom E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] This PDF file includes: Supplementary text Figs. S1 to S4 Table S1 References for SI reference citations www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2003496117 ZhenLiang Tian and Jack Wisdom 1 of 11 Supporting Information Text Model Comparison. Our model, which is the same as in (1), differs from the model of (2) in the following aspects: 1. Probably the most important difference is the tidal model. We use the conventional Darwin-Kaula constant Q model (3). In this model the tidal potential is expanded in a Fourier series and the response to each term is given a phase delay to model dissipation, by analogy to the damped harmonic oscillator. The explicit form builds in considerable constraints from orbital mechanics. There is little observational evidence to constrain the phase delays, but results from the analysis of lunar laser ranging (LLR) data are consistent with the Darwin-Kaula choice to set all the phase delays to be equal (4). Ćuk et al. (2) stated that there is a problem with the constant Q model: that it predicts a decay of orbital eccentricity that, to leading order, is independent of eccentricity. However, this is not true. Using the expressions in (3), one can show that the constant Q model gives a decay of eccentricity that is, to leading order, proportional to eccentricity. Nevertheless, given this misunderstanding of the constant Q model, Ćuk et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective S-Adic Symbolic Dynamical Systems
    Effective S-adic symbolic dynamical systems Val´erieBerth´e,Thomas Fernique, and Mathieu Sablik? 1 IRIF, CNRS UMR 8243, Univ. Paris Diderot, France [email protected] 2 LIPN, CNRS UMR 7030, Univ. Paris 13, France [email protected] 3 I2M UMR 7373, Aix Marseille Univ., France [email protected] Abstract. We focus in this survey on effectiveness issues for S-adic sub- shifts and tilings. An S-adic subshift or tiling space is a dynamical system obtained by iterating an infinite composition of substitutions, where a substitution is a rule that replaces a letter by a word (that might be multi-dimensional), or a tile by a finite union of tiles. Several notions of effectiveness exist concerning S-adic subshifts and tiling spaces, such as the computability of the sequence of iterated substitutions, or the effec- tiveness of the language. We compare these notions and discuss effective- ness issues concerning classical properties of the associated subshifts and tiling spaces, such as the computability of shift-invariant measures and the existence of local rules (soficity). We also focus on planar tilings. Keywords: Symbolic dynamics; adic map; substitution; S-adic system; planar tiling; local rules; sofic subshift; subshift of finite type; computable invariant measure; effective language. 1 Introduction Decidability in symbolic dynamics and ergodic theory has already a long history. Let us quote as an illustration the undecidability of the emptiness problem (the domino problem) for multi-dimensional subshifts of finite type (SFT) [8, 40], or else the connections between effective ergodic theory, computable analysis and effective randomness (see for instance [14, 33, 44]).
    [Show full text]
  • Covariant Hamiltonian Field Theory 3
    December 16, 2020 2:58 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE kfte COVARIANT HAMILTONIAN FIELD THEORY JURGEN¨ STRUCKMEIER and ANDREAS REDELBACH GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨ur Schwerionenforschung GmbH Planckstr. 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany and Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universit¨at Frankfurt am Main Max-von-Laue-Str. 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected] Received 18 July 2007 Revised 14 December 2020 A consistent, local coordinate formulation of covariant Hamiltonian field theory is pre- sented. Whereas the covariant canonical field equations are equivalent to the Euler- Lagrange field equations, the covariant canonical transformation theory offers more gen- eral means for defining mappings that preserve the form of the field equations than the usual Lagrangian description. It is proved that Poisson brackets, Lagrange brackets, and canonical 2-forms exist that are invariant under canonical transformations of the fields. The technique to derive transformation rules for the fields from generating functions is demonstrated by means of various examples. In particular, it is shown that the infinites- imal canonical transformation furnishes the most general form of Noether’s theorem. We furthermore specify the generating function of an infinitesimal space-time step that conforms to the field equations. Keywords: Field theory; Hamiltonian density; covariant. PACS numbers: 11.10.Ef, 11.15Kc arXiv:0811.0508v6 [math-ph] 15 Dec 2020 1. Introduction Relativistic field theories and gauge theories are commonly formulated on the basis of a Lagrangian density L1,2,3,4. The space-time evolution of the fields is obtained by integrating the Euler-Lagrange field equations that follow from the four-dimensional representation of Hamilton’s action principle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chaotic Rotation of Hyperion*
    ICARUS 58, 137-152 (1984) The Chaotic Rotation of Hyperion* JACK WISDOM AND STANTON J. PEALE Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 AND FRANGOIS MIGNARD Centre d'Etudes et de Recherehes G~odynamique et Astronomique, Avenue Copernic, 06130 Grasse, France Received August 22, 1983; revised November 4, 1983 A plot of spin rate versus orientation when Hyperion is at the pericenter of its orbit (surface of section) reveals a large chaotic zone surrounding the synchronous spin-orbit state of Hyperion, if the satellite is assumed to be rotating about a principal axis which is normal to its orbit plane. This means that Hyperion's rotation in this zone exhibits large, essentially random variations on a short time scale. The chaotic zone is so large that it surrounds the 1/2 and 2 states, and libration in the 3/2 state is not possible. Stability analysis shows that for libration in the synchronous and 1/2 states, the orientation of the spin axis normal to the orbit plane is unstable, whereas rotation in the 2 state is attitude stable. Rotation in the chaotic zone is also attitude unstable. A small deviation of the principal axis from the orbit normal leads to motion through all angles in both the chaotic zone and the attitude unstable libration regions. Measures of the exponential rate of separation of nearby trajectories in phase space (Lyapunov characteristic exponents) for these three-dimensional mo- tions indicate the the tumbling is chaotic and not just a regular motion through large angles. As tidal dissipation drives Hyperion's spin toward a nearly synchronous value, Hyperion necessarily enters the large chaotic zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Blasius Boundary Layer
    3 Fluid flow at a large Reynolds number. In our first application of matched asymptotic expansions to problems of fluid dynam- ics, let us consider a two-dimensional flow past a solid body, B, at a large Reynolds number. In non-dimensional variables we have the Navier-Stokes equations derived in Section 1 (see equations (1.71)-(1.74)) which, omitting over bars, can be written as ∂u ∂u ∂u ∂p ∂2u ∂2u! + u + v = − + Re−1 + , (3.1) ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂x ∂x2 ∂y2 ∂v ∂v ∂v ∂p ∂2v ∂2v ! + u + v = − + Re−1 + , (3.2) ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x2 ∂y2 ∂u ∂v + = 0. (3.3) ∂x ∂y As boundary conditions we take a uniform stream far from the body, u → 1, v → 0, p → 0 as x2 + y2 → ∞, (3.4) and the no-slip conditions on the surface of the body, u = v = 0 at r = ∂B, (3.5) r being the position vector in the (x, y)-plane. One needs to be a little careful with formulating far-field conditions, especially when the solid surface extends to infinity downstream, however in every particular case this should not be an issue. 3.1 Outer limit - inviscid flow. Let Re → ∞. We attempt solution for the flow as an expansion, u = u0(x, y, t) + ..., v = v0(x, y, t) + ..., p = p0(x, y, t) + ..., (3.6) where the neglected terms are small but at this stage we do not know how small. The Navier-Stokes equations suggest correction terms of order Re−1but in fact the corrections prove to be O(Re−1/2).
    [Show full text]
  • Strictly Ergodic Symbolic Dynamical Systems
    STRICTLY ERGODIC SYMBOLIC DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS SHIZUO KAKUTANI YALE UNIVERSITY 1. Introduction We continue the study of strictly ergodic symbolic dynamical systems which was started in our earlier report [6]. The main tools used in this investigation are "homomorphisms" and "substitutions". Among other things, we construct two strictly ergodic symbolic dynamical systems which are weakly mixing but not strongly mixing. 2. Strictly ergodic symbolic dynamical systems Let A be a finite set consisting of more than one element. Let (2.1) X = AZ = H A, An = A forallne Z, neZ be the set of all two sided infinite sequences (2.2) x = {a"In Z}, an = A for all n E Z, where (2.3) Z = {nln = O, + 1, + 2,} is the set of all integers. For each n E Z, an is called the nth coordinate of x, and the mapping (2.4) 7r,: x -+ a, = 7En(x) is called the nth projection of the power space X = AZ onto the base space An = A. The space X is a totally disconnected, compact, metrizable space with respect to the usual direct product topology. Let q be a one to one mapping of X = AZ onto itself defined by (2.5) 7En(q(X)) = ir.+1(X) for all n E Z. The mapping p is a homeomorphism ofX onto itself and is called the shift trans- formation. The dynamical system (X, (p) thus obtained is called the shift dynamical system. This research was supported in part by NSF Grant GP16392. 319 320 SIXTH BERKELEY SYMPOSIUM: KAKUTANI Let X0 be a nonempty closed subset of X which is invariant under (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Abelian Conversion and Quantization of Non-Scalar Second
    FIAN-TD/05-01 hep-th/0501097 Non-Abelian Conversion and Quantization of Non-scalar Second-Class Constraints I. Batalin,a M. Grigoriev,a and S. Lyakhovichb aTamm Theory Department, Lebedev Physics Institute, Leninsky prospect 53, 119991 Moscow, Russia bTomsk State University, prospect Lenina 36, 634050 Tomsk, Russia ABSTRACT. We propose a general method for deformation quantization of any second-class constrained system on a symplectic manifold. The constraints deter- mining an arbitrary constraint surface are in general defined only locally and can be components of a section of a non-trivial vector bundle over the phase-space manifold. The covariance of the construction with respect to the change of the constraint basis is provided by introducing a connection in the “constraint bundle”, which becomes a key ingredient of the conversion procedure for the non-scalar constraints. Unlike arXiv:hep-th/0501097v1 13 Jan 2005 in the case of scalar second-class constraints, no Abelian conversion is possible in general. Within the BRST framework, a systematic procedure is worked out for con- verting non-scalar second-class constraints into non-Abelian first-class ones. The BRST-extended system is quantized, yielding an explicitly covariant quantization of the original system. An important feature of second-class systems with non-scalar constraints is that the appropriately generalized Dirac bracket satisfies the Jacobi identity only on the constraint surface. At the quantum level, this results in a weakly associative star-product on the phase space. 2 BATALIN, GRIGORIEV, AND LYAKHOVICH CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 2. Geometry of constrained systems with locally defined constraints 5 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Quantization of Chern Simons Gauge Theory
    J. DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY 33(1991) 787 902 GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION OF CHERN SIMONS GAUGE THEORY SCOTT AXELROD, STEVE DELLA PIETRA & EDWARD WITTEN Abstract We present a new construction of the quantum Hubert space of Chern Simons gauge theory using methods which are natural from the three dimensional point of view. To show that the quantum Hubert space associated to a Riemann surface Σ is independent of the choice of com plex structure on Σ, we construct a natural projectively flat connection on the quantum Hubert bundle over Teichmuller space. This connec tion has been previously constructed in the context of two dimensional conformal field theory where it is interpreted as the stress energy tensor. Our construction thus gives a (2 + 1 ) dimensional derivation of the basic properties of (1 + 1) dimensional current algebra. To construct the con nection we show generally that for affine symplectic quotients the natural projectively flat connection on the quantum Hubert bundle may be ex pressed purely in terms of the intrinsic Kahler geometry of the quotient and the Quillen connection on a certain determinant line bundle. The proof of most of the properties of the connection we construct follows surprisingly simply from the index theorem identities for the curvature of the Quillen connection. As an example, we treat the case when Σ has genus one explicitly. We also make some preliminary comments con cern ing the Hubert space structure. Introduction Several years ago, in examining the proof of a rather surprising result about von Neumann algebras, V. F. R. Jones [20] was led to the discovery of some unusual representations of the braid group from which invariants of links in S3 can be constructed.
    [Show full text]
  • Turbulent-Prandtl-Number.Pdf
    Atmospheric Research 216 (2019) 86–105 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Atmospheric Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/atmosres Invited review article Turbulent Prandtl number in the atmospheric boundary layer - where are we T now? ⁎ Dan Li Department of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: First-order turbulence closure schemes continue to be work-horse models for weather and climate simulations. Atmospheric boundary layer The turbulent Prandtl number, which represents the dissimilarity between turbulent transport of momentum and Cospectral budget model heat, is a key parameter in such schemes. This paper reviews recent advances in our understanding and modeling Thermal stratification of the turbulent Prandtl number in high-Reynolds number and thermally stratified atmospheric boundary layer Turbulent Prandtl number (ABL) flows. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that there are strong linkages between the mean flowproperties such as the turbulent Prandtl number in the atmospheric surface layer (ASL) and the energy spectra in the inertial subrange governed by the Kolmogorov theory. Such linkages are formalized by a recently developed cospectral budget model, which provides a unifying framework for the turbulent Prandtl number in the ASL. The model demonstrates that the stability-dependence of the turbulent Prandtl number can be essentially captured with only two phenomenological constants. The model further explains the stability- and scale-dependences
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Dimensional Analysis and Similarity
    Chapter 5 Dimensional Analysis and Similarity Motivation. In this chapter we discuss the planning, presentation, and interpretation of experimental data. We shall try to convince you that such data are best presented in dimensionless form. Experiments which might result in tables of output, or even mul- tiple volumes of tables, might be reduced to a single set of curves—or even a single curve—when suitably nondimensionalized. The technique for doing this is dimensional analysis. Chapter 3 presented gross control-volume balances of mass, momentum, and en- ergy which led to estimates of global parameters: mass flow, force, torque, total heat transfer. Chapter 4 presented infinitesimal balances which led to the basic partial dif- ferential equations of fluid flow and some particular solutions. These two chapters cov- ered analytical techniques, which are limited to fairly simple geometries and well- defined boundary conditions. Probably one-third of fluid-flow problems can be attacked in this analytical or theoretical manner. The other two-thirds of all fluid problems are too complex, both geometrically and physically, to be solved analytically. They must be tested by experiment. Their behav- ior is reported as experimental data. Such data are much more useful if they are ex- pressed in compact, economic form. Graphs are especially useful, since tabulated data cannot be absorbed, nor can the trends and rates of change be observed, by most en- gineering eyes. These are the motivations for dimensional analysis. The technique is traditional in fluid mechanics and is useful in all engineering and physical sciences, with notable uses also seen in the biological and social sciences.
    [Show full text]