DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Theoretical Framework and Historical Background

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Theoretical Framework and Historical Background Notes 1 Theoretical Framework and Historical Background 1. See the discussion of these parts in Kennedy (1994) and Dixon (1971). 2. To give but four examples: the notion of ‘context’ from anthropology (Malinowsky 1923); from philosophy and speech act theory (Austin 1962); from cooperative principle and the maxims of communication (Grice 1975); from soci- ology, politeness and face (Brown and Levinson 1978). 3. Edwards (1997) argues in this connection that ‘In conversation analysis and dis- cursive psychology, the “loose fit” between descriptions and their referents has to be understood as an essential feature of how language works’ (p. 116). 4. Langacker (1993:29–33) discusses some similar examples regarding metonymy and active zones. 5. See Jakobson’s proposal in his article (1971) and the discussion of this proposal in Chapter 2, section 2.1.1.1. 6. Jakobson observes in this connection that similarity in meaning connects the symbols of a metalanguage with the symbols of the language referred to. Similarity connects a metaphorical term with the term for which it is substituted. Consequently, when constructing a metalanguage to interpret tropes the researcher possesses more homogeneous means to handle metaphor, whereas metonymy, based on a different principle, easily defies interpretation. Therefore, nothing comparable to the rich literature on metaphor can be cited for the theory of metonymy. (1971:95) 7. See Miftäh for a similar attempt to treat both kinäyah and majäz mursal as one phenomenon. In this connection he argues that ‘majäz mursal becomes one special case of kinäyah because both involve a relation between two things’ (1985:114–15). 8. This type of majäz is based on existential relations like totality, partiality, situa- tionality and positionality. These relations obviously pertain to the world of things and objects and not so much to the world of words or concepts. 9. The word used in the Arabic text is ‘kinäyah’ which could be translated as metonymy but I preferred to use the general meaning which is intended in the original text as contrasted to tasrïh, that is explicitness. It should be noted here that the term kinäyah in Arabic is always associated with implicitness – a point that will be elaborated further in the course of this chapter. 10. Al-Mubarrad’s social functions of kinäyah revolve around the social values desig- nated to covering names by means of title ‘kunayah’. It should be noted here that some Arab rhetoricians give examples of what they perceive as kinäyah that are derived totally by means of convention rather than by means of proximity or contiguity. For example, they would interpret the word na‘jah ‘ewe’ which is men- tioned in the Qur’anic verse inna hädhä ’akhi lahu tis‘un wa tis‘ün na‘jatan ‘this man, who is my brother, has ninety-nine ewes’ as ‘woman’. 11. Context here refers to the wider notion of context which is the cultural context as in the case of idioms for example. 184 Notes 185 12. This view is very important in modern treatments of metonymy which consider the trope as comprising two types: one is called referential metonymy and the other predicative metonymy (see Chapter 2, sections 2.1.2.4 and 2.1.2.5, for details of this). 13. Both forms are morphologically possible. 14. Here he means majäz ‘aqlï, because the whole discussion is devoted to this type of majäz and the examples are illustrations of it. 15. ‘Cognitive’ in the sense of rational as delineated in the definition of this type of transfer above. 16. I mean here al-Qazwïni, who showed some sort of systematicity in his discussion of majäz. 17. According to one interpretation, the verse suggests that had the fingers been of equal length, man wouldn’t have been able to perform skillful actions with his hands. 2 Metonymy in Modern Figurative Theory 1. This is perhaps why for quite a long time the paper remained almost unnoticed by linguists or critical theorists. Lodge (1977:73) rightly argues that the paper did not seem very inviting to literary critics because its contents did not sound rele- vant to their concerns. 2. Bansloben (1996:8) argues that ‘critics such as Burke and White consider the two- fold model far too limiting. Instead, they advocate the more traditional four trope approach to rhetoric’. I think Jakobson revolutionised the theory of tropes, and his work benefited the theory of metonymy in particular in many ways. In other words, Jakobson put an end to a long tradition of trope enumeration. He tried to reveal the discursive and signifying power of both metonymy and metaphor. 3. Terms invented by I.A. Richards in his The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Goatly uses ‘topic’ instead of ‘tenor’ and uses the term ‘ground’ (G) (1997). 4. As we have seen in Chapter 1, this is the name Rosiene uses for an unknown ancient Latin rhetorician to whom Rhetorica ad Herennium is credited. Sometimes the treatise is ascribed to Cicero and as a result the author is sometimes referred to using the name Cicero, and followed by in square brackets ‘the Auctor’. This is the way the author is referred to in the bibliography of this book. 5. In semiotics and semantics, the term ‘seme’ as Wales asserts is ‘from Greek sema “sign”, and by analogy with PHONEME and MORPHEME, seme is used in European STRUCTURALISM and semantics (e.g. Greimas 1966; Coseriu 1967) to describe a minimal DISTINCTIVE FEATURE of meaning or COMPONENT.’ Semes define the essential denotations of different lexical items within a lexical field in terms of binary oppositions: e.g. items of clothing can be marked as being ‘with [ϩ] or without [Ϫ] sleeves’ (e.g. jacket vs. waistcoat) (Wales 1989:415). 6. On p. 109 the Groupe maintain that to construct a metaphor, we must couple two complementary synecdoches that function in a precisely inverse way and that fix an intersection between the terms S and R. 7. This is the symbol the Groupe use to designate the ‘semantic plane’. 8. This is the symbol the Groupe use to designate the ‘material plane’. 9. Osterwalder cites George S. Klein, who has labelled two basic attitudes – levelling and sharpening. The former ‘tends towards the obliteration of differences to facil- itate categorisation’ while the latter ‘is a tendency to be hypersensitive to minu- tiae, to respond excessively to fine nuances and small differences’ (1978:17). 10. This is of course indicative of a cyclical metonymic signification process which begins with the cloth moving to the desk and then to the whole office. 186 Notes 11. This situation is usually referred in sociolinguistic studies as ‘diglossia’. The first occurrence of the term ‘diglossia’, according to Hary (1993), was by Krumbacher in the very earliest years of the twentieth century, in which the author discussed both Greek and Arabic diglossia. Charles Ferguson reintroduced the term in his influential paper bearing the name ‘Diglossia’ as its title. He defines ‘diglossia’ as ‘a relatively stable language situation in which, in addition to the primary dialects of the language (which may include a standard or regional standards), there is a very divergent, highly codified (often grammatically more complex) superposed variety, the vehicle of a large and respected body of written literature, either of an earlier period or in another speech community, which is learned largely by for- mal education and is used for most written and formal spoken purposes but is not used by any sector of the community for ordinary conversation’ (1964:435). 12. See for these terms Fauconnier (1985:3–34). 13. I am using the term ‘indexical’ in a semiotic sense. See the discussion of this point in the next chapter, section 3.4.2. 14. The notion of schema is developed in Chapter 5 to account for the role of metonymy as a process of schematic coherence in text. 15. I think the reason for this is that there is a shift in theoretical perspectives in which modern accounts of tropes tend to be more intellectually driven to find out gen- eral rules and principles governing the cognitive processes involved in both of these two tropes. This focus is obviously different from that which is characteris- tic of traditional accounts of the tropes and which aims to provide taxonomies of figures and strives to enumerate types, examples and species without actually pro- viding general principles. See for further discussion on this Cooper (1986:12–20). 16. See the interesting discussion of the pragmatic aspects of tautologies in Wierzbicka (1991:392–452). 17. Panther and Thornburg (1999) treat this type of metonymy as potential for actual. 18. Here ‘functional’ has no terminological load. It refers to the fact that Gibbs is more interested in the function of metonymy in discourse. 19. Compare also ‘Nixon, who was a staunch anti-communist, bombed Hanoi almost immediately after taking office,’ which is surely predicative. 3 Metonymy and Semiotics 1. Keller (1998:47) coins this term to refer to Plato’s mystery of how is it possible ‘when I utter this sound, [and] I have that thing in mind … [that] you know that I have it in mind’? 2. In this connection, Fiske and Hartley maintain that ‘the central concerns of semi- otics … are: … the relationship between a sign and its meaning; and the way signs are combined into codes’ (1978:37). 3. For a good survey of this vastness see Eco (1976:9–14), who refers to the numer- ous areas that are related in some way or another to the semiotic field as the polit- ical boundaries. 4. It should be noted that even in linguistics the level of substance is usually regarded as to fall outside the scope of linguistics.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ovid's Wand: the Brush of History and the Mirror of Ekphrasis Presented In
    Ovid’s Wand: the brush of history and the mirror of ekphrasis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Reid Hardaway, M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2017 Dissertation Committee: Ethan Knapp, Advisor Karen Winstead Sarah-Grace Heller Copyright by Reid Hardaway 2017 Abstract The recent work on the manuscript reception of Ovid’s canon and Ovidian commentaries in western Europe has affirmed the author’s significant literary influence in the late Mid- dle Ages. The production and reception of Ovidinia flourished, and Ovid’s poems in- creasingly became read as coherent compositions rather than dissected for bits of moral exempla. In particular, the Metamorphoses profoundly affects the literary landscape of late medieval France and England. Allusions to Ovid’s poem reemerge throughout the late Middle Ages at defining moments of poetic self-consciousness, most often through figures of ekphrasis, the use of poetry in order to portray other media of art. By examin- ing such moments from a selection of influential medieval poems, the mind of the late medieval poet reveals itself in perpetual contestation with the images and figures of an Ovidian lineage, but the contest entails the paradoxical construction of poetic identity, which forces the poet to impose the haunting shadow of literary history onto the mirror of his or her craft. ii Acknowledgements The following work would not have been possible without the considerate and insightful assistance of my advisor, Ethan Knapp, as well as the other members of the dissertation committee, Karen Winstead and Sarah-Grace Heller.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing Fragment 6 X 10.T65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-78218-0 - The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Volume II 1100-1400 Edited by Nigel Morgan and Rodney M. Thomson Index More information General index A Description of England 371 A¨eliz de Cund´e 372 A talking of the love of God 365 Aelred of Rievaulx xviii, 6, 206, 322n17, 341, Abbey of the Holy Ghost 365 403n32 Abbo of Saint-Germain 199 Agnes (wife of Reginald, illuminator of Abel, parchmenter 184 Oxford) 178 Aberconwy (Wales) 393 Agnes La Luminore 178 Aberdeen 256 agrimensores 378, 448 University 42 Alan (stationer of Oxford) 177 Abingdon (Berks.), Benedictine abbey 111, Alan de Chirden 180–1 143, 200, 377, 427 Alan of Lille, Anticlaudianus 236 abbot of, see Faricius Proverbs 235 Chronicle 181, 414 Alan Strayler (illuminator) 166, 410 and n65 Accedence 33–4 Albion 403 Accursius 260 Albucasis 449 Achard of St Victor 205 Alcabitius 449 Adalbert Ranconis 229 ‘Alchandreus’, works on astronomy 47 Adam Bradfot 176 alchemy 86–8, 472 Adam de Brus 440 Alcuin 198, 206 Adam of Buckfield 62, 224, 453–4 Aldhelm 205 Adam Easton, Cardinal 208, 329 Aldreda of Acle 189 Adam Fraunceys (mayor of London) 437 Alexander, Romance of 380 Adam Marsh OFM 225 Alexander III, Pope 255, 372 Adam of Orleton (bishop of Hereford) 387 Alexander Barclay, Ship of Fools 19 Adam de Ros, Visio S. Pauli 128n104, 370 Alexander Nequam (abbot of Cirencester) 6, Adam Scot 180 34–5, 128n106, 220, 234, 238, 246, Adam of Usk 408 451–2 Adelard of Bath 163, 164n137, 447–8, De naturis rerum 246 450–2 De nominibus utensilium 33, 78–9 Naturales
    [Show full text]
  • The Ars Versificaria of Gervase of Melkley Structure, Hierarchy, Borrowings
    Le poetriae del medioevo latino Modelli, fortuna, commenti a cura di Gian Carlo Alessio e Domenico Losappio The Ars versificaria of Gervase of Melkley Structure, Hierarchy, Borrowings Alan M. Rosiene (Florida Institute of Technology, USA) Abstract Gervase of Melkley, a younger contemporary of Geoffrey of Vinsauf, writes his De arte versificatoria et modo dictandi at the peak of a revisionary movement that places the discussions of figures and tropes inherited from classical and medieval grammatical and rhetorical traditions in new contexts, creating what we now call the Arts of Poetry and Prose. Gervase’s art draws upon the works of Matthew of Vendome, Geoffrey of Vinsauf, and Bernardus Silvestris for its doctrine and its examples. But how often does Gervase refer to these writers? How does he use their arts in his art? When does he borrow from them? What doctrine and which examples does he borrow? Does he cite his references and, if so, what are his citation practices? This chapter surveys Gervase’s borrowings from the works of Matthew, Geoffrey, and Bernardus by way of a review of the Index nominum and Index scriptorium of Hans Jurgen Graebener’s modern edition of the De arte versificatoria. The review locates Gervase’s borrowings of doctrine and examples with greater precision, and corrects errors in the indices as needed. Charting the precise citation practices of Gervase clarifies the meaning of his hierarchy of the three writers, places his long supposed use of the Poetria nova in serious doubt, and reopens the question of his art’s date. Summary 1 Introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetoric in the Faculty of Arts at the Universities of Paris and Oxford in the Middle Ages : a Summary of the Evidence
    RHETORIC IN THE FACULTY OF ARTS AT THE UNIVERSITIES OF PARIS AND OXFORD IN THE MIDDLE AGES : A SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE Introduction The subject of the present paper1 — the 'decline' of rhetoric at the Universities of Paris and Oxford (taken as the premier, benchmark institutions of their type for the period 2) during the last three 1. The present investigation represents a preliminary survey of the possibility that rhetoric was taught in the medieval western universities of Paris and Oxford more substantially than has hitherto been thought. The investigation arose out of two cir­ cumstances. The first was to find a home for the manuscripts of rhetorical commen­ taries written, apparently, during the second half of the twelfth century and the first quarter of the thirteenth, that have come to light since I began working on articles concerning the fortleben of Cicero's De inverinone and the pseudo-Ciceronian Ad Herennium for the international series Catalogus Translationum et Commentariorum Medii Aevi, ed. V. Brown, F. E. Cranz and P. O. Kristeller. The second circumstance was an invitation to talk on the subject at a special Colloque organised by Olga Weijers (Constantijn Instituut, The Hague) and Louis Holtz (Institut de Recherche et d'histoire des Textes, Paris) at the Institut de France, Paris, 18-20 May 1995 and enti­ tled 'L'Enseignement des disciplines à la Faculté des Arts (Paris et Oxford, XIIIe- XVe siècles)'. The Proceedings of this Colloque are currently in press, under the just- mentioned title. They contain a short summary of some aspects of the paper here printed.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Images of ethnicity in later medieval Europe Weeda, C.V. Publication date 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Weeda, C. V. (2012). Images of ethnicity in later medieval Europe. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:29 Sep 2021 169 5 Painting Peoples In the twelfth century, catalogues enumerating human diversity and the world’s riches surface in poetry, prose, sermons and historiography. In some cases these catalogues migrate from East to West, just as the early lists compiled in monasteries as tools to ruminate mankind’s sins had. In his renowned epic verse the Alexandreis, for example, Walther of Châtillon inserted an ekphrasis (representation of a work of art) of the world description inscribed on the tomb of Darius III, the last Persian king who was murdered by the satrap Bessus in 330 BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Medieval Rhetoric: Epideictic Underpinnings in Old English Homilies
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University English Dissertations Department of English Fall 12-12-2010 Early Medieval Rhetoric: Epideictic Underpinnings in Old English Homilies Jennifer M. Randall Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_diss Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Randall, Jennifer M., "Early Medieval Rhetoric: Epideictic Underpinnings in Old English Homilies." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2010. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_diss/61 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of English at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EARLY MEDIEVAL RHETORIC: EPIDEICTIC UNDERPINNINGS IN OLD ENGLISH HOMILIES by JENNIFER RANDALL Under the Direction of Dr. George Pullman ABSTRACT Medieval rhetoric, as a field and as a subject, has largely been under-developed and un- der-emphasized within medieval and rhetorical studies for several reasons: the disconnect be- tween Germanic, Anglo-Saxon society and the Greco-Roman tradition that defined rhetoric as an art; the problems associated with translating the Old and Middle English vernacular in light of rhetorical and, thereby, Greco-Latin precepts; and the complexities of the medieval period itself with the lack of surviving manuscripts, often indistinct and inconsistent political and legal struc- ture, and widespread interspersion and interpolation of Christian doctrine. However, it was Christianity and its governance of medieval culture that preserved classical rhetoric within the medieval period through reliance upon the classic epideictic platform, which, in turn, became the foundation for early medieval rhetoric.
    [Show full text]
  • Producing the Lector
    Producing the Lector Autor(en): Copeland, Rita Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: SPELL : Swiss papers in English language and literature Band (Jahr): 25 (2011) PDF erstellt am: 11.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-389639 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Producing the Lector Rita Copeland Medieval grammatical curricula did not treat aU authors alike: the prestige conferred on the auctor was determined by the functions that various texts served in the curriculum. This paper attempts a fine-tuned account of the progression to those classical and medieval works that represented the transition to the "uterary" in its own rigkt.
    [Show full text]
  • Amoenus (With Flowery Meadows Ad Libitum)
    182 9. HEROES AND RULERS it? . Surely God created it with his bare hand, to astonish Nature ." Descriptions of beautiful men and women are obligatory in courtly poetry and were turned out in accordance with recipes which we need not discus s here.37 10 a7 Ecphrasis of a beautiful man : Stud. med ., IX (1936), 38, No . 3o.—Chretien's term for ecphrasis is devise (Perceval, 1805) .—Description of human ugliness de - rives from the vituperatio . In its treatment of epideixis antique rhetoric made The Ideal Landscap e "blame" the opposite of praise . This had consequences for medieval poetry, into 1 . Exotic Fauna and Flora / 2 . Greek Poetry / 3 . Virgil which it is impossible to go here. Sidonius' description of Gnatho (Epistles III, 13 ) was the model for the style .—In medieval Latin : Vitalis' Amphitruo, 11 . 25 if., 4. Rhetorical Occasions for the Description of Nature Geta in Alda, 11 . 171 if., Davus in the Ars versificatoria of Matthew of Vendome , 5. The Grove / 6. The Pleasance / 7 . Epic Landscape I, $53 (Faral in Stud. med ., IX [1936], 55) . Cf. supra, p. 69, n. 17. HE CLASS ideals and human ideals of late Antiquity, the Middl e Ages, and the Renaissance were given expression in the schemata o f T panegyrical topics. Rhetoric conveys the picture of the ideal man . But for millenniums it also determines the ideal landscape of poetry . 1 . Exotic Fauna and Flora Medieval descriptions of nature are not meant to represent reality . This is generally recognized in respect to Romanesque art, but not in respect t o the literature of the same period .
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Grammar and Rhetoric Language Arts and Literary Theory, Ad 3Oo-I475
    MEDIEVAL GRAMMAR AND RHETORIC LANGUAGE ARTS AND LITERARY THEORY, AD 3OO-I475 EDITED BY RITA COPELAND AND INEKE SLUITER OXPORD UNIVERSITY PRESS CONTENTS List of Abbreviations xi GENERAL INTRODUCTION I PART i ARTS OF LANGUAGE, CA. 300-CA. 950 INTRODUCTION 62 TERENTIANUS MAURUS, DE LITTERIS AND DE SYLLABIS, CA. 300 72 AELIUS DONATUS, ARS MINOR, ARS MAIOR, LIFE OF VIRGIL, CA. 350 82 MARIUS VICTORINUS, COMMENTARY ON THE DE INVENTIONE, BEFORE 355 104 SERVIUS, COMMENTARY ON THE AENEID, CA. 400-420 . 125 TIBERIUS CLAUDIUS DONATUS, LNTERPRETATIONES VERGILIANAE, CA. 400 141 MARTIANUS CAPELLA, DE NUPTIIS PHILOLOGIAE ET MERCURII, CA. 420-490 148 PRISCIAN, INSTITUTIONES GRAMMATICAE AND INSTITUTIO DE NOMINE PRONOMINE VERBO, CA. 520 167 BOETHIUS, DE TOPICIS DIEFERENTIIS, BOOK 4, CA. 523 190 CASSIODORUS, EXPOSITIO PSALMORUM, CA. 540, AND INSTITUTIONES, CA. 562 210 ISIDORE OF SEVILLE, ETYMOWGIAE, CA. 625 232 VIRGILIUS MARO GRAMMATICUS, EPISTOLAE AND EPITOMAE, CA. 650 248 BEDE, DE ARTE METRICA AND DE SCHEMATIBUS ET TROPIS, CA. 710 256 Vlll CONTENTS ALCUIN, ARS GRAMMATICA AND DISPUTATIO DE RHETORICA ET DE VIRTUTIBUS, CA. 790-800 272 GLOSSES ON PRISCIAN BY REMIGIUS AND HIS FOLLOWERS (NINTH AND TENTH CENTURIES) 299 PART 2 DOSSIERS ON THE ABLATIVE ABSOLUTE AND ETYMOLOGY INTRODUCTION 312 THE ABLATIVE ABSOLUTE DOSSIER 314 ETYMOLOGY DOSSIER 339 PART 3 SCIENCES AND CURRICULA OF LANGUAGE IN THE TWELFTH CENTURY INTRODUCTION • 368 COMMENTARIES ON PRISCIAN, CA. 1080 TO CA. 1150: GLOSULE, ' NOTE DUNELMENSES, WILLIAM OF CONCHES 376 RUPERT OF DEUTZ, DE SANCTA TRINITATE ET OPERIBUS EIUS, 1112-1116: GRAMMAR AND RHETORIC 390 THIERRY OF CHARTRES, COMMENTARIES ON THE DE INVENTIONE AND RHETORICA AD HERENNIUM, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • ISHR Program with Chairs
    A Warm Welcome from the President of ISHR, Mike Edwards Dear Colleagues, It is with the greatest of pleasure that I welcome you to London for the twenty-first biennial conference of the International Society for the History of Rhetoric, with the theme ‘The Spaces of Rhetoric’. This is a significant milestone in the history of our wonderful Society, as the conference both ‘comes of age’ and celebrates the fortieth anniversary of the foundation of ISHR on 30 June 1977. I am delighted that one of the founder members, Professor Sir Brian Vickers, who hosted that first meeting in Zurich, is here with us at Queen Mary. The program includes a rich variety of papers in the history of rhetoric from antiquity to the modern day. I hope that you enjoy the three days of our biennial rhetorical feast and also find the space within your time here to enjoy some of the many attractions of London. Mike Edwards WEDNESDAY 26 JULY Council Meeting (Bancroft 1.02.6): 14.00-17.00 Registration (foyer of Great Hall): 15.30-17.30 Conference Opening (Great Hall): 17.30-18.15 Reception (Octagon): 18.30-21.00 THURSDAY 27 JULY Registration (Bancroft 1.13): 08.00-12.00; 14.00-17.00 SESSION 1: 09.00-10.30 A. (Bancroft 1.02.6) Classical 1: Attic Orators I Chair: Katya Haskins 1. Michael Gagarin The Rhetoric of Anticipation in Attic Oratory 2. Marie-Pierre Noël Espaces civiques et espaces panhelléniques dans les discours Olympiques de Gorgias et de Lysias et dans le Panégyrique d’Isocrate 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume IV Edited by David Luscombe and Jonathan Riley-Smith Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521414105 - The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume IV Edited by David Luscombe and Jonathan Riley-Smith Index More information INDEX Note: Page numbers in italics refer to maps and figures; footnotes are annotated n; plate numbers are given in italics (e.g. Plate 43) Aachen, council of (816–17) 247 account rolls 12–13 Abasges peoples 578n Accursius, Glossa ordinaria 124, 137 ‘Abbadids, of Seville 603, 604 Acerenza, province of 445 ‘Abbasid caliphate 9, 564, 566, 620 Acre 65, 562, 574 abbatia (abbey), use of term 353 siege of 45, 559–61 abbeys see monasteries; religious communities Adalard of Corbie, Statutes of 35 Abbo, abbot of Fleury 361, 493 Adalbero, bishop of Laon 4, 148–9, 167, 336, 366 abbots 15, 353 critic of Peace of God movement 192, 193–4 appointment of 360, 361 Adalbero, bishop of Metz 277 and n lay (secular) 361 Adalbert, archbishop of Hamburg/Bremen ‘Abd al-Mu’min, Almohad caliph 592, 611, 243–4, 258 612–13 Adalbert of Bologna 477 and al-Andalus 614, 615–16 Adam, abbot of Ebrach 550 ‘Abd al-Rahman III, caliph of Cordoba´ 602 Adam of Balsham (Adam du Petit-Pont) 399, ‘Abd al-Rahman al-Nasir, caliph of Cordoba´ 599, 476, 492 603 Adam of St Victor 672 ‘Abd al-Rahman (Sanjul) 601 Adana (Cilicia) 541, 568, 588 ‘Abd Allah bin al-Aftas, ruler of Badajoz 603 Adela of Blois 343, 511, 544, 673 ‘Abd Allah bin Buluggin, ruler of Granada 604, Adelaide of Maurienne 549 605, 607 Adelard of Bath 436, 463, 481 ‘Abd Allah bin Yasin, founder of Almoravids 606 on music 472 Abdallah ibn al-Fadl 575 on philosophy
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 69 1&2 Complete.Pdf (819.8Kb)
    EVENTEENTH- ENTURY EWS SPRING - SUMMER 2011 Vol. 69 Nos. 1&2 Including THE NEO-LATIN NEWS Vol. 59, Nos. 1&2 SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY NEWS VOLUME 68, Nos. 1&2 SPRING-SUMMER, 2010 SCN, an official organ of the Milton Society of America and of the Milton Section of the Modern Language Association, is published as a double issue two times each year with the support of the English Departments of Texas A&M University. SUBMISSIONS: As a scholarly review journal, SCN publishes only commis- sioned reviews. As a service to the scholarly community, SCN also publishes news items. A current style sheet, previous volumes’ Tables of Contents, and other information all may be obtained via our home page on the World Wide Web. Books for review and queries should be sent to: Prof. Donald R. Dickson English Department 4227 Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 77843-4227 E-Mail: [email protected] WWW: http://www-english.tamu.edu/pubs/scn/ ISSN 0037-3028 SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY NEWS EDITOR DONALD R. DICKSON Texas A&M University ASSOCIATE EDITORS James Egan, University of Akron Michele Marrapodi, University of Palermo Patricia Garcia, University of Texas E. Joe Johnson, Clayton State University Matthew E. Davis, Texas A&M University EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Elise A. Beck, Texas A&M University CONTENTS VOLUME 69, NOS. 1&2 ................................ SPRING-SUMMER, 2011 Helen Wilcox, ed. The English Poems of George Herbert. Review by JEFFREY P. BECK............................................................................................... 1 John Gouws, ed. Nicholas Oldisworth’s Manuscript (Bodleian MS. Don.c.24). Review by A.H. DE QUEHEN ........................................................................... 4 Joad Raymond. Milton’s Angels:The Early Modern Imagination.
    [Show full text]