DOCSLIB.ORG

Potomac Yard Metrorail Station

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Potomac Yard Metrorail Station Public Hearing Staff Report POTOMAC YARD METRORAIL STATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Public Hearing Staff Report Draft Environmental Impact Statement and General Plans September 2015 Public Hearing Staff Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 PROJECT HISTORY ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.4 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND GENERAL PLANS ............................................................................................... 6 1.5 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ................................................................................................................................................. 10 2 SUMMARY OF PUBLIC HEARING ....................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 PUBLIC HEARING FORMAT .................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS PROVIDED .................................................................................................................................. 11 2.3 SUMMARY OF OPEN HOUSE ................................................................................................................................................. 11 2.4 SUMMARY OF STAFF PRESENTATION ....................................................................................................................................... 12 2.5 INDIVIDUALS PROVIDING TESTIMONY ...................................................................................................................................... 14 2.6 CONCLUSION OF HEARING .................................................................................................................................................... 14 3 SUPPLEMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD...................................................... 15 4 COMPACT ARTICLE VI, SECTION 15 – OTHER AGENCY REVIEW AND COMMENTS .................................. 18 4.1 AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE .................................................................................................................................................. 18 4.2 CITY OF ALEXANDRIA OUTREACH ........................................................................................................................................... 19 4.3 CITY OF ALEXANDRIA BOARD/COMMISSION REVIEW AND LEGISLATIVE PROCESS .............................................................................. 19 5 COMMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE PUBLIC RECORD ANNOTATED WITH RESPONSES ........................... 21 5.1 BACKGROUND ON COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ....................................................................................................................... 21 5.2 SUMMARIZED COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ............................................................................................................................. 23 5.3 OUTLINE OF COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ............................................................................................................................... 80 5.4 INDEX OF RESPONSES .......................................................................................................................................................... 82 5.5 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES .............................................................................................................................................. 102 6 PUBLIC HEARING RESPONSE ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................... 276 6.1 PUBLIC HEARING FEEDBACK FORM ....................................................................................................................................... 276 6.2 SUMMARY OF COMMENTERS BY LOCATION AND TYPE .............................................................................................................. 278 6.3 FEEDBACK PERTAINING TO THE PUBLIC HEARING ..................................................................................................................... 279 6.4 ANALYSIS OF COMMENTS RECEIVED ..................................................................................................................................... 279 7 OTHER INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC RECORD ....................................................................................... 282 7.1 COMMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD .................................................................................................... 282 7.2 CITY OF ALEXANDRIA’S SELECTION OF A PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ............................................................................................... 282 8 STAFF RECOMMENDATION .............................................................................................................................. 283 APPENDICES................................................................................................................................................................. 284 A. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND LIST OF RECIPIENTS B. MATERIALS AVAILABLE TO PUBLIC AT HEARING C. OPEN HOUSE DISPLAY BOARDS D. PUBLIC HEARING STAFF PRESENTATION E. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS F. ALL COMMENTS SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD (WITHOUT ANNOTATIONS) G. REFERENCE MATERIALS H. CITY OF ALEXANDRIA BOARDS AND COMMISSION SUBMISSIONS I. COMMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD J. OTHER AGENCY LETTERS September 2015 Proposed Potomac Yard Metrorail Station i Public Hearing Staff Report LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1: Potomac Yard Draft EIS Study Area ............................................................................................................. 8 Figure 1-2: Proposed Alternatives for Potomac Yard Station ......................................................................................... 9 Figure 6-1: Potomac Yard Metrorail Station Feedback Form .................................................................................... 276 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1: Build Alternatives Characteristics ................................................................................................................... 7 Table 1-2: Public Hearing Notices and Outreach ......................................................................................................... 10 Table 2-1: Individuals Providing Testimony at the WMATA Public Hearing ............................................................... 14 Table 3-1: Comment Cards Submitted at WMATA Public Hearing ............................................................................ 15 Table 3-2: Comments Received by Email .................................................................................................................... 15 Table 4-1: Agencies Receiving Copies of the Draft EIS .............................................................................................. 18 Table 4-2: City of Alexandria Outreach Events ............................................................................................................ 19 Table 4-3: City of Alexandria Board and Commission Meetings ................................................................................. 19 Table 4-4: Individuals Providing Testimony at City of Alexandria Public Hearing ...................................................... 20 Table 4-5: Individuals who Submitted Comment Cards at City of Alexandria Public Hearing .................................. 20 Table 5-1: Comments by Topic ..................................................................................................................................... 22 Table 5-2: Index of Comments by Topic ....................................................................................................................... 82 Table 6-1: WMATA Public Hearing Feedback Form - Location ................................................................................ 277 Table 6-2: WMATA Public Hearing Feedback Form - Time of Day .......................................................................... 277 Table 6-3: WMATA Public Hearing Feedback Form - Useful Information ................................................................ 277 Table 6-4: WMATA Public Hearing Feedback Form - Overall Satisfaction .............................................................. 277 Table 6-5: WMATA Public Hearing Feedback Form - Race...................................................................................... 278 Table 6-6: WMATA Public Hearing Feedback Form - Income .................................................................................. 278 Table 6-7 Individual Commenters by Address ........................................................................................................... 278 Table 6-8 Commenters by Organization ....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amazon's HQ2 Decision
    RESEARCH JULY 2019 AMAZON’S HQ2: AN UPDATE ON ITS IMPACT ON THE WASHINGTON COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE MARKET AMAZON HAS ARRIVED PROJECT’S PUBLIC COST AND INCENTIVES More than seven months after announcing its decision to locate one half of its “HQ2” in National Landing, Amazon’s plans for its new campus are • Amazon will receive $550 million in workforce cash grants coming into focus. Amazon has signed leases at four buildings in from the Commonwealth of Virginia for the creation of National Landing totaling approximately 585,000 square feet. Amazon 25,000 new jobs. Additionally, Amazon can receive up to has moved into 47,512 square feet at 2345 Crystal Drive as it quickly $200 million in grants if it delivers on an additional 12,850 begins its hiring process for HQ2, and will occupy 88,000 square feet at jobs beyond the initial requirement. 241 18th Street South, 191,000 square feet at 1800 South Bell Street and 258,000 square feet at 1770 Crystal Drive as renovations at each location • Amazon will receive a cash grant of $23 million from finish. Working with JBG Smith, the largest property owner in National Arlington County for the incremental growth of an existing Landing and Amazon’s development partner, property manager and retail local Transient Occupancy Tax over the next 15 years. leasing agent, Amazon has begun to build out its workforce. Amazon is investing upwards of $95 million in tenant renovations. Notably, 1770 • The Commonwealth of Virginia has pledged $250 million Crystal Drive, where it will occupy the entirety of the 258,000 square foot towards Virginia Tech’s $1 billion investment in a new building, will make up a majority of the renovations, accounting for $80 campus proximate to Amazon’s new headquarters, which million of the total amount.
    [Show full text]
  • Hq2 Impact Research & Analysis National Landing–Va
    HQ2 IMPACT RESEARCH & ANALYSIS NATIONAL LANDING–VA AMAZON BACKGROUND In 1994, Jeff Bezos started Amazon in Seattle, WA, as an of commercial property in the nation. At its current growth online bookstore out of his garage, delivering books pace, Amazon will control more than one square foot of himself. Time magazine named Bezos the “Person of distribution space for every adult U.S. shopper by 2022. the Year” in 1999 when it recognized the company’s success in popularizing online shopping. After the Great The online retailer’s headquarters is located in the South Recession Amazon began to show its potential, attracting Lake Union neighborhood of Seattle, dubbed “Amazonia,” 615 million annual visitors to its website, while employing which encompasses over 8.1 million square feet of space in 17,000 people with real estate holdings encompassing 33 buildings and houses over 45,000 employees. Amazon 12 million square feet in 2008. Amazon has evolved into drove unprecedented job growth in Seattle, completely the largest Internet retailer in the world as measured by revitalized neighborhoods around its campus, and sparked revenue and market capitalization, surpassing $1.0 trillion an urban residential development boom. However, in value last September. Amazon’s rapid growth has also strained Seattle’s housing market, contributed to growing traffic congestion, Today, the world’s largest retailer employs over 575,000 full- and placed pressure on its public transportation system. and part-time workers and controls more than 158 million square feet of leased and owned office, industrial, and KING COUNTY MEDIAN SINGLE FAMILY HOME SALE PRICE retail property in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendation to Eliminate Regional Metrobus Routes 9B Hunting Towers/Crystal City and 10P Mount Vernon Avenue Crystal City
    Approval of Staff Report and Recommendation to Eliminate Regional Metrobus Routes 9B Hunting Towers/Crystal City and 10P Mount Vernon Avenue Crystal City Executive Summary: • On February 16, 2006 the Board authorized staff to conduct a public hearing on the proposal to eliminate regional routes 9B Hunting Towers/Crystal City and 10P Mount Vernon Avenue/Crystal City. • Both routes have performed poorly since their inception • 9B averages 248 daily passenger and five passengers per trip. • 10P averages 460 daily passenger and 10 passengers per trip. • Alexandria Transit Company (DASH) is implementing two new routes (AT10 & AT11) that provide replacement service for routes 9B and 10P, and provides Saturday service. • Alternative service is available via Metrobus routes 9A, 9E, 9S 10A, 10B,10E. Public Hearing The Public Hearing was held on March 9, 2006 at the Charles Houston Recreation Center in Alexandria, Virginia. • 11 persons attended the hearing, three witnesses testified for the record. In addition one petition with 20 signatures and five e-mails were received for the record. • All three witnesses, four of the e-mails, and the petition opposed the elimination of one or both routes. Budget: FY 2007 Cost ($1,256,000) Revenue 125,000 Subsidy ($1,131,000) Recommendation: • Approve the staff report and recommendation to eliminate regional routes 9B Hunting Towers/Crystal City and 10P Mount Vernon Avenue/Crystal City. • If approved service will be discontinued June 25, 2006. 1 Subsidy Allocation Breakdown Annual Jurisdiction Impact District of Columbia ($133,000) Montgomery County ($76,000) Prince George’s ($73,000) County Alexandria ($629,000) Arlington County ($150,000) Fairfax City ($2,000) Fairfax County ($66,000) Falls Church ($2,000) Total ($1,131,000) 2 Staff Report and Recommendations on Proposed Elimination of Regional Metrobus Routes 9B and 10P (Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • 1200 N Henry St (Route 1) // Old Town Alexandria, VA 22314
    1200 N Henry St (Route 1) // Old Town Alexandria, VA 22314 20,100 SF Anchor Space Available For More Matt Skalet Dimitri Georgelakos 5225 Wisconsin Avenue, NW Information, [email protected] [email protected] Suite 600 Please Contact: 202.420.7775 703.288.2999 Washington, DC 20015 1200 N Henry St (Route 1) // Old Town Alexandria, VA 22314 Property Highlights: Demographic Snapshot // 2017: > Billboard opportunity for 20,100 SF anchor space on Route 1 .25-Mile 1-Mile 2-Mile /North Henry (47,000 ADT) Population 2,851 28,020 73,938 > Conveniently located between downtown Old Town and Daytime Population 1,552 37,888 74,242 Potomac Yards Average HH Income $154,447 $166,189 $155,499 > 1st floor of 109 unit resid ential building > 89 dedicated retail parking spaces. There will be additional on street Traffic Counts // 2017: parking on newly constructed Fayette Street Henry St (Route 1) 47,000 (ADT) For More Matt Skalet Dimitri Georgelakos 52255225 Wisconsin Wisconsin Avenue, Ave, NW NW Information, [email protected] [email protected] SuiteSuite 600 600 Please Contact: 202.420.7775 703.288.2999 Washington,Washington, DC DC 20015 20015 1200 N Henry St (Route 1) // Old Town Alexandria, VA 22314 GROUND FLOOR N FAYETTE ST. N FAYETTE Retail 20,100 PROPOSED NORTH HENRY (ROUTE 1) 47,00 ADT FULL ACCESS RETAIL PARKING N FAYETTE ST. N FAYETTE 89 SPACES PROPOSED NORTH HENRY (ROUTE 1) 47,00 ADT FULL ACCESS Site Plan For More Matt Skalet Dimitri Georgelakos 5225 Wisconsin Avenue, NW Information, [email protected] [email protected] Suite 600 Please
    [Show full text]
  • Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities August 2011
    Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities August 2011 Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Bus Planning August 2011 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Bus Planning Jim Hamre, Director of Bus Planning Krys Ochia, Branch Manager 600 5th Street NW Washington, DC 20001 Parsons Brinckerhoff Brian Laverty, AICP, Project Manager Nicholas Schmidt, Task Manager 1401 K Street NW, Suite 701 Washington, DC 20005 Contents Executive Summary ES-1 Existing Conditions ES-1 Policies and Procedures ES-2 Future Demand ES-3 Recommendations ES-4 Introduction 1 Study Process 3 Coordination 3 On-Site Observations 3 Operating Issues 3 Future Demand 4 Permitting and Enforcement 4 Existing Conditions 7 Key Observations 8 Operating Issues 9 Policies and Procedures 17 Permitting 17 Enforcement 19 Future Demand 25 Methodology 25 Results 28 Recommendations 33 Facility Design 34 Demand Management 37 Permitting 39 Enforcement 42 Contents | i Figures Figure ES-1: Future Shuttle Demand Estimate ES-4 Figure 1: Location of Peer U.S. Transit Agencies 4 Figure 2: Study Stations 7 Figure 3: Vehicles in Tight Turning Areas May Block Bus Bay Entrances (New Carrollton Station) 11 Figure 4: Long Kiss & Ride Queue (New Carrollton Station) 11 Figure 5: Pedestrian Shortcut (Southern Avenue Station) 11 Figure 6: Shuttle Blocking Kiss & Ride Travel Lane (King Street Station) 12 Figure 7: Shuttle Blocking Bus Stop (Anacostia Station) 13 Figure 8: Typical Signs Prohibiting Non-Authorized Access to Station Bus Bays
    [Show full text]
  • Potomac Yard/Potomac Greens
    POTOMAC YARD/POTOMAC GREENS SMALL AREA PLAN ADOPTED 1992 MASTER PLAN ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA Amended-11/24/1992 Ordinance #3603 Amended-11/18/1995 Ordinance #3836 POTOMAC YARD/POTOMAC GREENS SMALL AREA PLAN The listing of City Officials and Staff from the original adopted version of this Small Area Plan does not reflect current appointments and therefore is not included in this online version. POTOMAC YARD/POTOMAC GREENS SMALL AREA PLAN AMENDED PAGE NUMBERS 67 68 73 74 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE OF THE PLAN Background and Issues Description of the Area 1 Area History 1 Demographics 3 Existing Land Use 3 Existing Zoning 5 Existing Height Limits 7 Environmental Conditions 9 Additional Factors Affecting Development 12 Land Use Policy History 15 Transportation 19 Land Use and Urban Design Analysis 34 Land Use Plan Concept 40 Development Parameters 46 Plan Recommendations Goals and Objectives 57 CDD Principles 68 Developm ent W ithout A CDD Special Use Permit 72 LIST OF MAPS 1. Study Area 2 2. Existing Land Use 4 3. Existing Zoning 6 4. Existing Heights 8 5. Constraints 10 6. Wetlands Preservation Area 11 7. National Airport Noise Contours 13 8. 1974 Master Plan 16 9. Opportunities 38 10. Distances from Metro Stations 39 11. Land Use Concept 42 12. Open Space Concept 43 13. Neighborhoods 45 14. General Character of Residential Areas 49 15. Predominant Height Limits for COD 55 16. 1974 Master Plan 58 17. Land Use Changes 59 18. Proposed Land Use 60 19. Existing Zoning 61 20. Zoning Changes 62 21. Proposed Zoning 63 22.
    [Show full text]
  • 10B-FY2020-Budget-Adoption-FINALIZED.Pdf
    Report by Finance and Capital Committee (B) 03-28-2019 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary MEAD Number: Resolution: Action Information 202068 Yes No TITLE: Adopt FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 CIP PRESENTATION SUMMARY: Staff will review feedback received from the public and equity analysis on the FY2020 Proposed Budget and request approval of the Public Outreach and Input Report, FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to seek Board acceptance and approval of the Public Outreach and Input Report and Title VI equity analysis, and the FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 CIP. DESCRIPTION: Budget Priorities: Keeping Metro Safe, Reliable and Affordable The budget is built upon the General Manager/CEO's Keeping Metro Safe, Reliable and Affordable (KMSRA) strategic plan. Metro is making major progress to achieve the goals of this plan by ramping up to average capital investment of $1.5 billion annually, establishing a dedicated capital trust fund exclusive to capital investment, and limiting jurisdictional annual capital funding growth to three percent. Metro continues to encourage the U.S. Congress to reauthorize the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act (PRIIA) beyond FY2020, which provides $150 million in annual federal funds matched by $150 million from the District of Columbia, State of Maryland, and Commonwealth of Virginia. In order to establish a sustainable operating model, Metro is limiting jurisdictional operating subsidy growth to three percent and deploying innovative competitive contracting. The items on the KMSRA agenda that remain to be completed include restructuring retirement benefits and creating a Rainy Day Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon HQ2 and Northern Virginia
    VIEWPOINT WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE RESEARCH What are the impacts? Amazon HQ2 and the Northern Virginia and D.C. markets Amazon plans to split its new HQ2 headquarters between Crystal City in Arlington, Virginia and Long Island City in Queens, New York. It anticipates creating 25,000 jobs and occupying 4 million sq. ft. of office space in each city over the next 10 years. This is a watershed development for the Washington, D.C. and Northern Virginia markets and it indicates the importance of walkable environments, quality access to transit and infrastructure for major employers. More importantly, it confirms the strength of the D.C. region’s talent. 19 NOVEMBER 2018 CBRE Research © 2018 CBRE Inc.| 1 VIEWPOINT WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE RESEARCH EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The key impacts on the Northern Virginia and D.C. markets are as follows: • Amazon’s 4 million-sq.-ft. requirement would account for 33% of Crystal City’s existing office inventory, and its 25,000 employees would comprise 11% of the D.C. region’s tech1 labor market. • The average annual wage for tech employees in the D.C. region is $106,500, which Amazon has announced it will well exceed at $150,000. • Amazon’s 25,000 employees would generate about 50,000 additional jobs in indirect industries and in retail, housing and services. This could jump to as many as 125,000 indirect jobs depending on the composition of Amazon employees, Amazon’s local spending and its employee spending patterns. • Office demand totaling 7 million sq. ft. could occur from indirect job growth. In 2017, Northern Virginia’s annual net absorption totaled 2.3 million sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint WMATA/City Meeting #1
    BRADDOCK METRO STATION REDEVELOPMENT BRADDOCK METRO STATION BRADDOCK METRO STATION REDEVELOPMENT Joint City/WMATA Community Meeting June 26, 2014 Charles Houston Recreation Center www.alexandriava.gov/Braddock PURPOSE OF MEETING BRADDOCK METRO STATION REDEVELOPMENT BRADDOCK METRO STATION • Introduce WMATA’s Joint Development RFP Process and Transit Needs • Present Small Area Plan and Implementation Progress • Obtain Input on Metro Station Presenters: • Susan Eddy, City of Alexandria • Stan Wall, WMATA 2 TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT BRADDOCK METRO STATION REDEVELOPMENT BRADDOCK METRO STATION • At Metro sites, WMATA is committed to Transit Oriented Development (TOD): – Density for high ridership – Mixed Uses to create origins and destinations – Pedestrian-oriented to minimize auto dependence Example: Twinbrook Joint Development 3 WHAT IS JOINT DEVELOPMENT? BRADDOCK METRO STATION REDEVELOPMENT BRADDOCK METRO STATION • A creative program that markets property owned by WMATA to commercial, residential or mixed-use developers to create a Transit Oriented Development (TOD). • Through a competitive joint development solicitation WMATA selects a developer. Example: White Flint Joint Development Rendering • WMATA prefers to enter a long-term ground lease for development of the site. 4 WMATA JOINT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES BRADDOCK METRO STATION REDEVELOPMENT BRADDOCK METRO STATION • Integrate WMATA transit facilities • Foster safe station access • Promote and enhance transit ridership • Provide mixed-use development and active public spaces • Help
    [Show full text]
  • North Potomac Yard Small Area Plan
    North Potomac Yard Small Area Plan Creating a Complete Sustainable Community Table of Contents Acknowledgements Master Plan Overview 1. Vision and Guiding Principles ........................................................ 3 Vision Statement Guiding Principles Creating a Complete, Sustainable Community Environmental Sustainability Economic Sustainability Social Sustainability 2. Sustainability ................................................................................... 9 Recommendations 3. Urban Design – Plan Framework ................................................ 13 A. Urban Design Framework B. Framework Streets and Street Hierarchy C. Creation of Three Distinct Urban Neighborhoods D. Gateways and Vistas E. Urban and Building Form F. Public Art and History Recommendations 4. Land Use ....................................................................................... 25 A. Balancing Land Uses B. Neighborhood Land Use Strategy C. Land Use—Future Zoning (Coordinated Development District) D. Retail Uses E. Adjacent Redevelopment Site F. Building Height G. Parking Strategy H. Open Space I. Housing J. Development Summary Recommendations 5. Community Facilities .................................................................... 51 A. Projected Demographics B. Collocation, Flexibility, and Incentives C. Community Facilities D. Implementation of Community Facilities Recommendations North Potomac Yard Small Area Plan i 6. Transportation ............................................................................... 57 A. Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • BTC WMATA Station Summer 2019 Shutdown Update
    Fairfax Connector and Metrobus Plans for Alternative Service during WMATA’s Reconstruction of Blue and Yellow Line Stations South of Reagan National Airport Station Board Transportation Committee Meeting March 26, 2019 Michael Felschow & Anna Nissinen Fairfax County Department of Transportation Background: Platform Conditions ▪ 45 outdoor station platforms have been exposed to weather and de-icing agents for decades ▪ Platforms built 35 to 40 years ago are now deteriorating • 10 stations already have rebuilt platforms Braddock Road Station • 15 stations have platforms in good condition • 20 stations have platforms requiring immediate attention; temporary measures have been installed where needed to stabilize and ensure safety until reconstruction occurs ▪ Concrete repair is a necessary safety project Department of Transportation Van Dorn Station 2 WMATA Major Outage Guidelines to Minimize Customer Impacts • No station should experience two major outages in a three-year period • Focus construction on summer and major holiday weekends to reduce impact on loyal commuters • Concentrate work to minimize impact to riders, rather than conducting a series of smaller outages • Deliver best possible service outside work zone • Provide public notification several months in advance Department of Transportation 3 Platform Rehabilitation Project ▪ During Summer 2019, there will be no Blue or Yellow Line rail service south of National Airport from Saturday, May 25 to Monday, September 2, 2019 ▪ Anticipated Construction Schedule: • May 25- September 2,
    [Show full text]
  • Vre Operations Board
    VRE OPERATIONS BOARD September 19, 2014 Executive Committee Meeting - 9:00 am Operations Board Meeting - 9:30 am Joint Audit Committee Meeting to Follow Board Meeting Capital Committee Meeting to follow JAC Meeting PRTC Headquarters 14700 Potomac Mills Road Woodbridge, VA 22192 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes from the July 18, 2014 VRE Operations Board Meeting 5. Chairman’s Comments 6. Chief Executive Officer’s Report 7. Virginia Railway Express Riders’ and Public Comments 8. Closed Session 9. Action Items A. Referral of Preliminary FY 2016 Operating and Capital Budget to the Commissions B. Authorization to Increase Amount for General Engineering Consulting VI Contract C. Authorization to Issue a Request for Proposals for General Planning Consulting I Contract for Project Development Services D. Authorization to Issue a Request for Proposals for General Engineering Consulting VII Contract for Project Implementation Services E. Authorization to Issue an Invitation for Bids for Consolidated Security Alarm and Access System Monitoring and Maintenance Services F. Authorization to Amend the Contract for Passenger Railcars G. Authorization to Issue a Request for Proposals for Engineering and Environmental Services for a Life Cycle Maintenance Facility H. Authorization to Amend the Contract for Auditing Services I. Authorization to Award a Contract for Marketing and Advertising Services J. Authorization to Amend the VRE Tariff Replacing the Two-Ride Ticket with a Day Pass and Making Other Administrative Edits 10. Information Item A. Update on Jurisdictional Action on the Master Agreement B. Fredericksburg Mitigation Accommodation C. 2014 Customer Service Survey 11.
    [Show full text]