DOCSLIB.ORG

Plan 2018 Update Town of Sharon Hazard Mitigation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plan 2018 Update Town of Sharon Hazard Mitigation TOWN OF SHARON HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2018 UPDATE Final Plan FEMA Approval Pending Adoption May 21, 2018 Adopted by the Town of Sharon Board of Selectmen June 5, 2018 PREPARED FOR: TOWN OF SHARON 90 SOUTH MAIN STREET SHARON, MASSACHUSETTS 02067 PREPARED BY: METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COUNCIL 60 TEMPLE PLACE BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02111 TEL 617.933.0700 WWW.MAPC.ORG ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS & CREDITS This plan was prepared for the Town of Sharon by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) under the direction of the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) and the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). The plan was funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Grant Program. MAPC Officers President, Keith Bergman, Town of Littleton Vice President, Erin Wortman, Town of Stoneham Secretary, Sandra Hackman, Town of Bedford Treasurer, Taber Keally, Town of Milton Executive Director, Marc Draisen, MAPC Thanks for the assistance of the following individuals: MAPC Staff Credits Project Manager: Martin Pillsbury Lead Project Planner: Emma Schnur Mapping/GIS Services: Eliza Wallace, Ryan Melendez Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency Director: Kurt Schwartz Department of Conservation and Recreation Commissioner: Carol I. Sanchez Sharon Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team James Wright, Chair Fire Department Beverly Anderson Health Department Lauren Barnes Town Administrator/Selectmen Linda Berger Recreation Department April Forsman Engineering/GIS Division John Ford Police Department Eric Hooper Department of Public Works Tilden Kaufman Police Department Richard Murphy Fire Department Mike Polimer Civil Defense Department Board of Selectmen, Public Meeting Participants and Community Stakeholders Special thanks to the Board of Selectmen for hosting two public meetings and to participants and community stakeholders. TOWN OF SHARON DRAFT HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2018 UPDATE I TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS & CREDITS .................................................................. I LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES ............................................................................ III SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................ 1 SECTION 2: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 7 SECTION 3: PLANNING PROCESS & PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ..................... 13 SECTION 4: RISK ASSESSMENT ..................................................................... 19 SECTION 5: HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS .................................................. 65 SECTION 6: EXISTING MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................... 67 SECTON 7: MITIGATION MEASURES FROM 2009 PLAN .............................. 73 SECTION 8: HAZARD MITIGATION STRATEGY............................................. 77 SECTION 9: PLAN ADOPTION & MAINTENANCE ......................................... 87 SECTION 10: LIST OF REFERENCES ............................................................... 89 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: LOCAL TEAM MEETING AGENDAS………………………..…91 APPENDIX B: HAZARD MAPPING…………………………………….….….97 APPENDIX C: DOCUMENTATION OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION…..….…....107 APPENDIX D: DOCUMENTATION OF PLAN ADOPTION…………....…….119 APPENCIX E: FEMA PLAN REVIEW………………………………………...121 TOWN OF SHARON DRAFT HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2018 UPDATE II of 133 LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES TABLES Table 1: Plan Review and Update Process ................................................................................................................... 3 Table 2: Previous Federal/State Disaster Declarations ............................................................................................. 7 Table 3: FEMA-Funded Mitigation Projects ................................................................................................................... 9 Table 4: Sharon Characteristics ................................................................................................................................... 10 Table 5: Hazard Risks Summary .................................................................................................................................. 19 Table 6: Norfolk County Flood Events, 1996 to 2017 ............................................................................................ 21 Table 7: Locally Identified Areas of Flooding .......................................................................................................... 24 Table 8: DCR Inventory of Dams in Sharon ............................................................................................................... 26 Table 9: Hurricane Records for Massachusetts, 1938 to 2012 ............................................................................. 28 Table 10: Saffir/Simpson Scale .................................................................................................................................. 28 Table 11: Enhanced Fujita Scale .................................................................................................................................. 29 Table 12: Tornado Records for Norfolk County ....................................................................................................... 30 Table 13: Nor’easter Events for Massachusetts, 1978 to 2018 ............................................................................ 31 Table 14: Norfolk County Thunderstorm Events, 1995 to 2017 ............................................................................ 32 Table 15: NESIS Categories ......................................................................................................................................... 35 Table 16: Severe Winter Storm Records for Massachusetts .................................................................................. 35 Table 17: Heavy Snow Events and Impacts in Norfolk County, 1996 to 2014 .................................................. 35 Table 18: Hail Size Comparisons ................................................................................................................................ 37 Table 19: Norfolk County Ice Storm Events, 1965 to 2015 ................................................................................... 38 Table 20: Richter Scale and Effects ............................................................................................................................ 39 Table 21: Historical Earthquakes in Massachusetts or Surrounding Area ............................................................ 39 Table 22: Landslide Volume and Velocity ................................................................................................................. 42 Table 23: Norfolk County Extreme Cold and Wind Chill Occurrences ................................................................ 46 Table 24: Norfolk County Extreme Heat Occurrences ............................................................................................ 47 Table 25: Chronology of Major Droughts in Massachusetts ................................................................................... 50 Table 26: Town of Sharon, MA 2005 Land Use ....................................................................................................... 54 Table 27: Summary of Sharon Developments, 2010-2017 ................................................................................... 56 Table 28: Future Development Sites in Hazard Areas ............................................................................................ 56 Table 29: Critical Facilities and Relationship to Hazard Areas ............................................................................. 58 Table 30: Estimated Damages from Hurricanes ....................................................................................................... 62 Table 31: Estimated Damages from Earthquakes .................................................................................................... 63 Table 32: Estimated Damages from Flooding ........................................................................................................... 64 Table 33: Existing Natural Hazard Mitigation Measures in Sharon ..................................................................... 70 Table 34: Status of Mitigation Measures from the 2010 Plan .............................................................................. 74 Table 35: Mitigation Measures for the Hazard Mitigation Strategy ................................................................... 80 Table 36: Prioritization of the Hazard Mitigation Measures ................................................................................. 84 FIGURES Figure 1: Existing Features: Critical Facilities, Development Sites, Open Space, & Local Hazard Areas ....... 5 Figure 2: USGS Flow Gage Data for Neponset River, March 2010 ................................................................... 20 Figure 3: State of Massachusetts Earthquake Probability Map ............................................................................ 41 TOWN OF SHARON DRAFT HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2018 UPDATE III of 133 Figure 4: Massachusetts Wildfires, 2001 to 2009 ................................................................................................... 44 Figure 5: Wind Chill Temperature Index and Frostbit Risk ..................................................................................... 46 Figure 6:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newsletter Vol
    Newsletter Vol. 3 — 2017 Message from the Chair, Dr. Robert Futrell This has been a very exciting year for UNLV Sociology. Throughout this third annual UNLV Sociology Newsletter, you will see outstanding and wide-ranging faculty, staff, and student accomplishments. Our collective activities demonstrate steadfast commitment to educating students, advancing sociological research, and serving our community. I remain more impressed than ever with the intellectual seriousness and practical importance demonstrated by all our activities. I also feel very honored and grateful to work with such a smart, congenial, and conscientious group of people. We’ve had a stellar (and very busy) year on the hiring front. I am very pleased to say that we are adding four exceptionally talented faculty members to our department. Our first search brought us two outstanding scholars: Dr. Courtney Carter (Ph.D. Univ. of Illinois-Chicago) focuses on racial construction processes, particularly how racial ideas structure organizational norms, values and practices. Her recent research examines the impact of HBCUs’ diversity efforts on the meaning and significance of race for the organizations.; Dr. Cassaundra Rodriguez (Ph.D., UMass-Amherst) focuses on immigration and citizenship, race and gender, family, media, and labor. Her primary re- search asks how citizenship is a negotiated ideal for racialized groups and how work can be the site of raced and gendered inequality. Our second search drew another two top-notch scholars: Dr. Tirth Bhatta (Ph.D., Case Western Reserve University) focuses on medical sociology, aging, health disparities, and demography. His research addresses the mechanisms underlying socioeconomic differences in health across different generations.; Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Accordingly, the United States Has Based Its Motion on These Sections As Well
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) V. ) Cr. No. 09-00017-GAO ) ) TAREK MEHANNA ) GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR DETENTION The United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, through the undersigned Attorneys, moves, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3142(f)(1)(A) and (B) and Section 3142(f)(2)(A) and (B) to detain the defendant TAREK MEHANNA pending trial. Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3142(e)(3)(B) and (C), there is a rebuttable presumption that “no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the [defendant] ... as required and the safety of the community.” Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL K. LOUCKS Acting United States Attorney By: /s/ Jeffrey Auerhahn JEFFREY AUERHAHN and ALOKE CHAKRAVARTY Assistant U.S. Attorneys Certificate of Service I do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing response was served upon the counsel of record for the defendant on this 5th day of November 2009. /s/ Jeffrey Auerhahn Jeffrey Auerhahn Assistant U.S. Attorney UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) ) V. ) Cr. No. 09-10017-GAO ) ) ) TAREK MEHANNA ) GOVERNMENT’S PROFFER AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DETENTION The United States Attorney hereby respectfully submits this memorandum and written proffer of evidence in support of the argument that the defendant TAREK MEHANNA (“MEHANNA”) should be detained pending trial because there are no conditions or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant or the safety of the community. I. Evidence and submissions The United States relies on the following submissions, one of which is already part of the record before this Court in Criminal Number 09-10017-GAO and Criminal Number 08-148-LTS: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kelly, Sharon Pratt
    Howard University Digital Howard @ Howard University Manuscript Division Finding Aids Finding Aids 1-26-2016 Kelly, Sharon Pratt DPAAC Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://dh.howard.edu/finaid_manu Recommended Citation Staff, DPAAC, "Kelly, Sharon Pratt" (2016). Manuscript Division Finding Aids. 249. https://dh.howard.edu/finaid_manu/249 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Finding Aids at Digital Howard @ Howard University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Manuscript Division Finding Aids by an authorized administrator of Digital Howard @ Howard University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Guide to the Sharon Pratt Kelly Papers DCAAP.0021 Moorland-Spingarn Research Center, Howard University Collection Number 228 Finding aid prepared by Finding aid prepared by D.C. Africana Archives Project This finding aid was produced using the Archivists' Toolkit January 26, 2016 Describing Archives: A Content Standard DC Africana Archives Project Gelman Library Special Collections, Suite 704 2130 H Street NW Washington DC, 20052 Guide to the Sharon Pratt Kelly Papers DCAAP.0021 Table of Contents Summary Information ................................................................................................................................. 3 Biographical/Historical note.......................................................................................................................... 4 Scope and Contents note..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FOXBOROUGH COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Foxborough Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
    FULLTIME FOXBOROUGH COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Foxborough Commuter Rail Feasibility Study FINAL REPORT September 1, 2010 Prepared For: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority With Support From: Massachusetts Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development Prepared By: Jacobs Engineering Group, Boston, MA With: Central Transportation Planning Staff, Boston , MA Anne S. Gailbraith, AICP Barrington, RI 1 REPORT NAME: Foxborough Commuter Rail Feasibility Study PROJECT NUMBER: A92PS03, Task Order No. 2 PREPARED FOR: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) PREPARED BY: Jacobs Engineering Group Anne S. Galbraith Central Transportation Planning Staff (CTPS) DATE: September 1, 2010 FOXBOROUGH COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 1: IDENTIFY KEY ISSUES AND PROJECT APPROACH .................................................... 13 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 Key Issues....................................................................................................................... 17 1.3 Approach ......................................................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 2: ANALYZE THE CAPACITY OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM.............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Taste of Potomac to Benefit Adoptions Together Movermoms
    PotomacPotomac Jonathan Hall hits the river and whitewater three or four times a week. “Love it, for sure. It’s a pas- sion,” he said. Classified, Page 14 Classified, ❖ Sports, Page 13 ❖ Taste of Potomac To Benefit Calendar, Page 8 Adoptions Together News, Page 4 Summer Fun MoverMoms News, Page 3 Change World One Project At a Time People, Page 10 Animals On and Off Duty Are Partners for Life News, Page 8 Photo by Ken Moore/The Almanac online at potomacalmanac.com www.ConnectionNewspapers.comMay 29 - June 4, 2013 Potomac Almanac ❖ May 29 - June 4, 2013 ❖ 1 2 ❖ Potomac Almanac ❖ May 29 - June 4, 2013 www.ConnectionNewspapers.com Potomac Almanac Editor Steven Mauren 703-778-9415 or [email protected] Summer Fun See www.potomacalmanac.com Family Takes Up Paddleboarding, Goes into Business Paddle on the Potomac, standing up. By Ken Moore The Almanac ichael Katz took his first stand-up paddle board les- Photos by Photos M son last August with Potomac Paddlesports. Now his entire family is hooked, even cre- Michael Katz and Sandra Aresta ating a business around the sport. Ken Moore “It changed my attitude towards the “Paddling is more than a sport, it’s a path Potomac River,” said Katz after time on the to a life in the wilderness. that’s really what river Memorial Day afternoon. “I got very it is,” said Pitcher. serious about it.” Living in Potomac and not paddling is like That’s what Sunny Pitcher hopes to do living in Vail or Aspen and not skiing or /The Almanac by offering kayak and paddleboard instruc- snowboarding, he said.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aerodynamic Effects of High-Speed Trains on People and Property at Stations in the Northeast Corridor RR0931R0061 6
    THE AERODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF u. S. Department of Transportation HIGH-SPEED TRAINS ON PEOPLE Federal Railroad Administration AND PROPERTY AT STATIONS IN THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR. PB2000-103859 III III[[11111[11111111111111111111 Safety of High-Speed Ground Transportation Systems REPRODUCED BY: N 'JS. u.s. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service Springfield, Virginia 22161 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1hour per response, includi'iPe the time for reviewing instructions, searchin~ eXistin?< data sources,rnthering and maintaining the data needed and completin~ and reviewin~ the collection of information. Send comments r~arding this bur en estimate or an~ other aspect of this collec Ion of in ormation, inclu IOlb,SU8%estions for redUCin~ this bur~~~. l0 ~hirron eadquarters ilfrvices, D~~torate~g[c Information Operations an Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Ighway. Suite 1204, Mnglon, VA 22202-4302, and to e ice of Managemen and Bud et Pa rwo Reduction Project 0704-0188 Washin on DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED November 1999 Final Report January 1998 - January 1999 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Sharon
    Boim et al v. American Muslims for Palestine et al Doc. 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STANLEY BOIM, individually and as administrator ) of the estate of DAVID BOIM, deceased, and ) JOYCE BOIM, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 17-cv-3591 AMERICAN MUSLIMS FOR PALESTINE, ) AMERICANS FOR JUSTICE IN PALESTINE ) EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION, RAFEEQ ) JABER, ABDELBASSET HAMAYEL, and ) OSAMA ABUIRSHAID, ) ) Defendants. ) Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs filed a Complaint seeking monetary, declaratory, and injunctive relief against defendants American Muslims for Palestine (“AMP”), Americans for Justice in Palestine Educational Foundation (“AJP”), Rafeeq Jaber, Abdelbasset Hamayel, and Osama Abuirshaid.1 Defendants move to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [31]. For the reasons stated herein, this Court grants defendants’ motion. Background The following factual background is derived from the Complaint and accepted as true as for purposes of ruling on the instant motion. In 1996, two agents of Hamas killed Stanley and Joyce Boim’s son, David Boim.2 The Boims filed a lawsuit against individuals and organizations here in the United States that were financing Hamas and, thus, the murder of their son. The Boims were 1 The Court has opted to use the defendants’ spelling of Osama Abuirshaid. 2 Hamas was added to the State Department’s list of terrorist organizations on October 8, 1997. https://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/other/des/123085.htm (last visited 8/18/2017). 1 Dockets.Justia.com awarded a judgment of $156 million in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Inviting International Students Into the Communication Classroom: the Wayne State University Global Communication Course
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 389 013 CS 509 071 AUTHOR Seymour, Ruth; Messinger, Sharon TITLE Inviting International Students into the Communication Classroom: The Wayne State University Global Communication Course. PUB DATE Apr 95 NOTE 17p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Central States Communication Association (Indianapolis, IN, April 19-23, 1995). PUB TYPE Speeches/Conference Papers (150) Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Course Descriptions; *English (Second Language); Foreign Students; *Global Approach; Higher Education; Instructional Improvement; *Intercultural Communication IDENTIFIERS Communication Strategies; Diversity (Student); *Wayne State University MI ABSTRACT The Department of Communication and the English Language Institute at Wayne State University in Detroit are one year into an experimental project id intercultural communication instruction that brings international students and metro-Detroit undergraduates into a shared classroom. The Detroit project design was partly funded by the Ford Foundation through the WayneState Diversity Project, and is of potential use to more than 150 colleges and universities nationwide with intensive ESL (English as a Second Language) programs. The Detroit Project's experience suggests that the curricular intents and requirements of classic undergraduate intercultural communication courses can mesh well with the administrative and curricular intents of programs designed to teach English to international visitors. Further, the global student mix permits simultaneous intercultural instruction at cognitive, affective, and behavioral levels in a manner much less possible in a standard undergraduate setting. This paper describes the administration, implementation, and curriculum of the course at Wayne State University, as well as its historical antecedents elsewhere, especially in the Intercultural Communication Workshop movement of the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Division Highlights
    2017-2021 Capital Investment Plan Letter from the Secretary & CEO On behalf of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) and the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), I am pleased to present the 2017-2021 Capital Investment Plan (CIP). Shaped by careful planning and prioritization work as well as by public participation and comment, this plan represents a significant and sustained investment in the transportation infrastructure that serves residents and businesses across the Commonwealth. And it reflects a transformative departure from past CIPs as MassDOT and the MBTA work to reinvent capital planning for the Commonwealth’s statewide, multi-modal transportation system. This CIP contains a portfolio of strategic investments organized into three priority areas of descending importance: system reliability, asset modernization, and capacity expansion. These priorities form the foundation of not only this plan, but of a vision for MassDOT and the MBTA where all Massachusetts residents and businesses have access to safe and reliable transportation options. For the first time, formal evaluation and scoring processes were used in selecting which transportation investments to propose for construction over the next five years, with projects prioritized based on their ability to efficiently meet the strategic goals of the MassDOT agencies. The result is a higher level of confidence that capital resources are going to the most beneficial and cost-effective projects. The ultimate goal is for the Commonwealth to have a truly integrated and diversified transportation investment portfolio, not just a “capital plan.” Although the full realization of this reprioritization of capital investment will be an ongoing process and will evolve through several CIP cycles, this 2017-2021 Plan represents a major step closer to true performance-based capital planning.
    [Show full text]
  • A Call to Prayer (A)
    A Call to Prayer (A) As Dr. Karen Majewski (My-ev-ski) drove up to the small brick city hall building in Hamtramck, Michigan on April 13, 2004, she noticed a number of news trucks parked out front. “ABC, NBC, Fox News, that’s not a good omen, you know.”1 Just a few months prior, Majewski became president of the city council: she still considered herself a reluctant newcomer to politics. At the sight of the news trucks, Majewski recalled: “You want to keep driving and head over the Ambassador Bridge (to Canada).” Yet she knew instantly why the press had gathered in her tiny city: the broadcast of the call to prayer. When Majewski moved to Michigan for graduate school, she wanted to find an ethnic urban neighborhood like her hometown of Chicago: a front-porch community where she would hear different languages spoken on the street. For a scholar specializing in immigration and ethnicity, Hamtramck was “the only perfect place.” Her years in academia are often reflected in her speech, self-possessed demeanor, and her personal style: she wears her long hair in a stylish bun and carefully selects vintage clothing and subtle touches of ethnic jewelry. Just before Majewski was drafted to run for city council, she completed her Ph.D. and published a book on Polish- American identity. She had no political aspirations beyond her work on the city’s historical commission, yet she welcomed being part of a shift away from “the Polish old guard” to a progressive, new urbanism agenda. Hamtramck is just over 2.1 square miles, and home to nearly 25,000 people: today, it is the most densely populated and the most internationally diverse city in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Footprints Dedicated to Preserving and Promoting Historic Resources in the Truckee Meadows Through Education, Advocacy and Leadership
    FootPrints Dedicated to Preserving and Promoting Historic Resources in the Truckee Meadows through Education, Advocacy and Leadership. vol. 15 no. 4 Fall 2012 The HRPS Harvest of Homes Tour 2012 Saturday, September 29, 10:00 am - 3:00 pm Research and Article by Debbie Hinman, Photographs by Emily Rogers uilding on two successful years of home tours, we are back for a third year with six more exciting Bhomes on display. They range from large and elabo- rate to small and tastefully simple, but they have two things in common: they all reflect the tastes and personalities of those who own them and they are all located in the Old Southwest part of Reno. What follows is a brief overview of the homes. For more in-depth history and descriptions, please purchase a ticket and receive a program that will reveal the historical and architectural detail, as well as a little about the lives of those who inhabited them. 1000 Plumas Street This graceful Queen Anne is our oldest home on the tour, circa 1911, and the only one without regular live-in owners. It is known as Plumas House and is rented out to those wishing a longer-term stay in Reno and preferring comfortable surroundings in a graceful, homey atmosphere to a standard vacation rental or condominium. It has a fascinating history of famous inhabitants, a remodel by a pre-eminent local architect, and a first life as a home for “women in distress.” Plumas House is owned by Anthony and Nancy Palladino. 575 Ridge Street Designed in 1927 by Frederic J.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Investment Plan: 2017-2021
    2017-2021 Capital Investment Plan Letter from the Secretary & CEO On behalf of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) and the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), I am pleased to present the 2017-2021 Capital Investment Plan (CIP). Shaped by careful planning and prioritization work as well as by public participation and comment, this plan represents a significant and sustained investment in the transportation infrastructure that serves residents and businesses across the Commonwealth. And it reflects a transformative departure from past CIPs as MassDOT and the MBTA work to reinvent capital planning for the Commonwealth’s statewide, multi-modal transportation system. This CIP contains a portfolio of strategic investments organized into three priority areas of descending importance: system reliability, asset modernization, and capacity expansion. These priorities form the foundation of not only this plan, but of a vision for MassDOT and the MBTA where all Massachusetts residents and businesses have access to safe and reliable transportation options. For the first time, formal evaluation and scoring processes were used in selecting which transportation investments to propose for construction over the next five years, with projects prioritized based on their ability to efficiently meet the strategic goals of the MassDOT agencies. The result is a higher level of confidence that capital resources are going to the most beneficial and cost-effective projects. The ultimate goal is for the Commonwealth to have a truly integrated and diversified transportation investment portfolio, not just a “capital plan.” Although the full realization of this reprioritization of capital investment will be an ongoing process and will evolve through several CIP cycles, this 2017-2021 Plan represents a major step closer to true performance-based capital planning.
    [Show full text]