DOCSLIB.ORG

Articles the Untimeliness of Biblical Philology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Articles the Untimeliness of Biblical Philology 10.3726/78000_9 Articles The Untimeliness of Biblical Philology Ronald Hendel University of California, Berkeley Abstract In response to Nietzsche’s call for an “untimely” philology, one that disrupts the present age for the sake of a future age, I explore the disruptive effects of biblical textual criticism from the Renaissance to the present. This brief genealogy of disruption features the controversial effects of Erasmus’s editio princeps of the New Testament, Cappel’s Critica Sacra, which inaugurated modern textual criticism of the Hebrew Bible, Wellhausen’s call for a critical eclectic edition of the Hebrew Bible, and my own text-critical project, The Hebrew Bible: A Critical Edition. The essay closes with a critique of postmodern anti-philology and prospects for future philology. Keywords philology, Nietzsche, critical edition, New Testament, Hebrew Bible, textual criticism A little more philology, a little more knowledge, a little more lack of knowledge, are not in the domain of impossible wishes. Julius Wellhausen1 In the second of his Untimely Observations (Unzeitgemässe Betrachtun- gen), Friedrich Nietzsche, professor of classical philology at Basel, called for a new kind of philology, one that disturbs contemporary culture: “I do not know what meaning classical philology would have for our age if not to have an untimely effect within it, that is, to act against the age and so have an effect on the age to the advantage, it is to be hoped, of a coming age”.2 1 Wellhauesen – Bleek, 1978, p. 656: “etwas mehr Philologie, etwas mehr Wissen und etwas mehr Nichtwissen, gehören nicht zu den unmöglichen Wünschen.” 2 Nietzsche, 1980, p. 8; 1874, p. vi (“ich wüsste nicht, was die classische Philologie in unserer Zeit für einen Sinn hätte, wenn nicht den, in ihr unzeitgemäss – das heisst gegen die Zeit und dadurch auf die Zeit und hoffentlich zu Gunsten einer kommenden Zeit – zu wirken”). © Peter Lang AG Philology, vol. 1/2015, pp. 9–28 10 Ronald Hendel Nietzsche practiced this kind of philology – a painstakingly close read- ing of the meaning and internal contradictions of European culture and thought – though, as his fellow classicist Ulrich Wilamowitz vigorously noted, Nieztsche’s “future philology” was far from the canons of academic discourse (Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, 2000; see further, Porter, 2000 and Pollack, 2009). While classical philology as such has rarely been untimely since Nietzsche, I wish to make the case that biblical philology has con- sistently been so, since at least the Renaissance, often despite the explicit intentions of its practitioners. There is something about biblical philology that is disruptive, that acts “against the age” (gegen die Zeit), even when it addresses the most banal of textual details, such as small scribal errors like dittography (the repetition of a letter) or haplography (the omission of one of two similar letters). The disruptive power of such details is emphatically voiced in rabbinic literature, as when a young scribe meets Rabbi Ishmael: “When I came to Rabbi Ishmael, he said to me, “My son, what is your occupation”? I said to him, “I am a copyist”. He said to me, “My son, be careful in your work, for your work is heaven’s work; for should you omit one letter or add one letter, you will destroy the entire universe”. Such consequences – even if only im- agined or exaggerated – indicate the potentially disruptive power of biblical philology, even in the precincts of textual criticism, in which diagnosing scribal errors are normal practice. When trafficking with a textually-based regime of knowledge, philology can be most untimely. As the following examples will illustrate, biblical philology can raise epistemic doubts and disrupt networks of authority. These effects are often marked, as we will see, by accusations of hubris and heresy. The work of textual criticism has a tendency to open new vistas by disrupting the doxa of everyday knowledge, the tacit “consensus on the sense of the world”, in Pierre Bourdieu’s formulation (Bourdieu, 1977, p. 167). These disruptive effects often set into motion the discourses of heterodoxy and orthodoxy, which reinforce each other by their contesting claims. This dialectic of disturbed (and hence focalized) doxa and con- sequent conflicts of heterodoxy and orthodoxy surrounds the practice of biblical philology in the modern era, even when its practitioners are in- nocent of such intentions. The work of biblical philology entails, to echo Jeremiah and Ecclesiastes, a tearing down and a building up. Given the status of the Bible in western culture, the untimeliness of this dialectic is inevitable. © Peter Lang AG Philology, vol. 1/2015, pp. 9–28 The Untimeliness of Biblical Philology 11 My brief genealogy of the disruptive effects of biblical philology begins with Erasmus’s 1516 edition of the New Testament, continues with Louis Cappel’s establishment of the discipline of textual criticism of the Hebrew Bible, and ends with a new project in which I am involved, The Hebrew Bible: A Critical Edition (the first volume is Fox, 2015). In the longue durée of biblical scholarship, the making of critical editions is an untimely act, bordered with imagined and real fears. In tracing the untimeliness of these philological works, I hope to contribute to Nietzsche’s call in “We Philolo- gists” (Wir Philologen) to “pose philology itself as a problem” (Nietzsche, 1990, p. 372),3 and to promote a philological practice that is self-reflective and aware of its own contradictions. The New Instrument In 1516 Erasmus published the first critical edition of the Greek New Tes- tament, titled Novum Instrumentum (“The New Instrument”) (Bentley, 1983, pp. 112–93). The Greek text was accompanied by a Latin translation that differed in many details from the Vulgate, which at this time was a more or less corrupted version of Jerome’s fourth-century translation. The variants from the Vulgate caused much furor. Among the readings omitted by Erasmus from his critical text and translation were a verse from the Epistle of John (1 John 5:7) that is the sole New Testament attestation of the Trinity, and a sentence in Matthew 6:13 that is the conclusion of the Lord’s Prayer (“For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, forever. Amen”.). These missing verses, along with other less sensational differences, raised controversy. Popular preachers and learned theologians accused Erasmus of heresy; some likened him to the Antichrist (Rummel, 1989, vol. I., pp. 117, 128, 137). Prior to publication, Erasmus’s friend Martin van Dorp cautioned him, “My dear Erasmus, much evil could come of this! Many people will begin to discuss the integrity of the text of the Sacred Scriptures, and many will begin to doubt even if only a small part appears to be false” 3 “Stellen […] die Philologie als Problem hin” (Nietzsche, DKG, NF-1875.5.135); see also Pollack, 2009, p. 937. © Peter Lang AG Philology, vol. 1/2015, pp. 9–28 12 Ronald Hendel (Asso, 2008, p. 172).4 Here is the fingerprint of biblical philology’s un- timeliness: it disturbs unquestioned doxa, such as the integrity – and by extension, the authority – of the biblical text. “Even if only a small part” is in question, the fact of raising this issue to popular consciousness is a clear danger: “many people will begin to discuss […] and many will begin to doubt”. The unsettling of biblical doxa and the ensuing critical discourse lead to heterodoxy. Philology, whether intentionally or not, dis- rupts the unquestioned habits of Christian faith. Dorp also rightly asserted that Erasmus’s philological method un- dermines the institutional authority of the Church theologians. As Cecilia Asso observes: “This is the substance of Dorp’s accusation: You have ridi- culed the theological profession as a whole, denigrating them and lowering their prestige in the eyes of the people, and now you take on a task which is traditionally theirs. Would that not indicate that you desire to eliminate their raison d’être?” (Asso, 2008, p. 171). The interpretation of Scripture was the theologians’ domain. Now a mere philologist was usurping their authority. This, Dorp cautioned, was an obvious danger to the Church. Erasmus was not shy about asserting his philological claim to au- thority in the domain of biblical interpretation against the scholastic the- ologians. The preface to the Novum Instrumentum included a section on method, Methodus Verae Theologiae (“The Method of True Theology”). In it he made clear that philology undercuts the authority of the theologians. Philology, he argued, offered the only reliable avenue to biblical truth. The prerequisite was not institutional authority but linguistic facility, which excluded virtually all the professional theologians of his time: The first concern must be the thorough learning of the three languages, Latin, Greek and Hebrew, because it is agreed that all the mystery of scripture is made known by them… I do not think that these men deserve attention who, while they rot in sophis- tical trifles until senility are accustomed to say, “Jerome’s translation is enough for me”. […] [T]hose who have invested a good part of their life in Bartolus, Averroes, Aristotle and the Sophistical cavilings do not savor the divine letters as they really are but only as they think they are (Jenkins – Preston, 2007, pp. 250, 253).5 4 “Officiet mehercle, Erasme. Nam de sacrarum litterarum integritate disputabunt plurimi, ambigent multi, si vel tantillum in iis esse falsi” (Allen, 1910, p. 15 [Ep. 304, 1514]). 5 “Prima cura debetur, per discendis tribus linguis, latinae, graecae, hebraicae, quod constet omnem scriptuam mysticam hisce proditam esse […] Nequem audiendos ar- bitror, istos quosdam, qui cum in sophisticis tricis, useque ad decrepitam aetatem © Peter Lang AG Philology, vol. 1/2015, pp. 9–28 The Untimeliness of Biblical Philology 13 These remarks on method are addressed to “the future theologian” – they clearly exclude the current crop of theologians who “rot in sophistical trifles until senility”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Currents in Reformed Theology Vol
    UNION WITH CHRIST Currents in Reformed Theology Vol. 4, No. 1 / April 2018 4, No. Vol. Westminster International Theological Reformed Seminary Evangelical Philadelphia Seminary uniocc.com Vol. 4, No. 1 / April 2018 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFORMED THEOLOGY AND LIFE Editorial Board Members Africa Flip Buys, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa Henk Stoker, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa Philip Tachin, National Open University of Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria Cephas Tushima, ECWA Theological Seminary, Jos, Nigeria Asia In-Sub Ahn, Chong Shin University and Seminary, Seoul, Korea UNION WITH CHRIST Wilson W. Chow, China Graduate School of Theology, Hong Kong Matthew Ebenezer, Presbyterian Theological Seminary, Dehra Dun, India Editorial Committee and Staff Benyamin F. Intan, International Reformed Evangelical Seminary, Jakarta, Indonesia Editor in Chief: Paul Wells Kevin Woongsan Kang, Chongshin Theological Seminary, Seoul, Korea Senior Editors: Peter A. Lillback and Benyamin F. Intan In Whan Kim, Daeshin University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, Korea Managing Editor: Bernard Aubert Billy Kristanto, International Reformed Evangelical Seminary, Jakarta, Indonesia Book Review Editor: Brandon D. Crowe Jong Yun Lee, Academia Christiana of Korea, Seoul, Korea Subscription Manager: Audy Santoso Sang Gyoo Lee, Kosin University, Busan, Korea Assistant: Lauren Beining Deok Kyo Oh, Ulaanbaatar University, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia Copy Editor: Henry Whitney Moses Wong, China Reformed Theological Seminary, Taipei, Taiwan Typesetter: Janice Van Eck Australia Mission Statement Allan M. Harman, Presbyterian Theological College, Victoria, Australia Peter Hastie, Presbyterian Theological College, Victoria, Australia Unio cum Christo celebrates and encourages the visible union believers possess Mark D. Thompson, Moore Theological College, Newtown, Australia in Christ when they confess the faith of the one holy catholic and apostolic church, the body of Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theology of Dort
    Program The Theology of Dort (1618–1619) Confessional Consolidation, Conflictual Contexts, and Continuing Consequences Groningen, May 8–9, 2019 Dutch theological faculties.at the Synod (painting Museum of Dordrecht) Confessional Consolidation and Conflictual Contexts (Wednesday) Time Wednesday morning (plenary) ~ Zittingszaal 10.00 Welcome by the dean of the faculty, prof.dr. Mladen Popovic and Brief introduction by Henk van den Belt 10.15 Dr. Dolf te Velde, Theological University of Kampen, Justified by Faith? Franciscus Gomarus on the Crucial Issue with Jacob Arminius 11.00 Coffeebreak 11.15 Prof.dr. Volker Leppin, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, A disliked doctrine: Predestination, Dort and the Lutherans 12.00 Dr. Harm Goris, Tilburg School of Catholic Theology, Total depravity or relapse into natural state? Roman Catholic views on the effects of the Fall 12.45 Lunch Wednesday afternoon ~ Zittingszaal Zaal 130 14.00 Jacob van Sluis, Groningen University Library and Jeannette Kreijkes, PhD Groningen, Did the Tresoar Leeuwarden, The Franeker Academy and the Synod of Dort Consider Chrysostom a Semi- Synod of Dort Pelagian? Continuity and Discontinuity of Early Christian Views in the Reformed Tradition 14.30 Bert Koopman, independent scholar, Preparatory work, Prof.dr. Wim van Vlastuin, Vrije Universiteit rejected by the front door, stealthily admitted by the back Amsterdam, Retrieving the doctrine of the door apostasy of the saints in the ‘Remonstrantie 15.00 Coffee / Tea 15.30 Prof.dr. Wim Moehn, Protestant Theological University, Dr. Pieter L. Rouwendal, independent scholar, Debating regeneration – from baptismal water to seed of A Slight Modification in a Classic Formula: regeneration. the Reformed Theologians at the Synod of Dort on the Extent of the Atonement 16.00 Prof.dr.
    [Show full text]
  • To Volume II
    Index to Volume II 2 announcement, 171, 296, 297, 302 Antichrist, 164, 556, 598, 600, 603, 604, 609, 610, 2 Clement 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 598– merits and justification, 370 620 2 Maccabees any opponent of Christ an antichrist, 598–600 prayer for dead, 442 Lutherans teach this doctrine others support this as well, 610 A one great Antichrist spoken of, 600 ability, 39, 43, 49, 105, 110, 213, 254, 306, 323, 343, distinuished from other anitchrists, 600 369, 403, 404, 410, 430, 549, 583 names for Abraham’s bosom (heaven), 722 Little Horn, King of the North, the Beast, absolute decree, 311, 477, 715 the Great Prostitute, 601 accident, 72, 633 Man of Sin or Lawlessness, 600 actio, 270 Pope in Rome is the Antichrist additions to Scripture. See Word of God:sufficiency of agent of Satan, 616 adiaphora, 416–18, 542 archtypal representative of unbelief and Christian's attitude governed by opinio legis, 606 must defend liberties when attacked in claims infallibility, 606, 607 principle, 417 claims to be vicar (subsitute) of Christ, 606 own conscience, 416 curses justification by grace alone, 606 respect for liberty of others and welfare of weak damns those not subject to him, 608 brother, 416 doctrine highly deceptive, 616 Christian's attitude governed by, 416 fits historical outline given in Scripture, offense, 418 609–10 adoption, 19, 111, 204, 213, 214, 226, 325, 358, 394, lies are his chief strength, 609 463, 620, 731 Lutherans teach this doctrine, 613–16 adoration of the host, 278 others support this as well, 616 advent, second, 669, 649–73 objections to, 611–13 Aeschylus, 685 opposes Christ in church and state, 604 agreement of Word of God.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia 2 Carmel Mccarthy
    TEXT – VERSIONS Text of the OT – Masorah 1 Karl Elliger et al. (eds.), Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia Originally published in 1977 (fourth edition), slightly revised for the fi fth edition by Adrian Schenker (1997), the BHS is well established as the standard critical edition of the Hebrew Bible. The German Bible Society has made available the BHS in reduced format as a handy, inexpensive, yet well-produced paperback volume that includes the entire text, complete with prefaces and critical apparatus. – On the European continent, the work is available from the German Bible Society, in the USA from Hendrickson, and in the United Kingdom from Alban Books. – The ideal study text for students and scholars. Hendrickson Publishers/Alban Books, Edinburgh (2007) LXIX/1–1574 (BL) 2 Carmel McCarthy (ed.), Deuteronomy The larger part of this instalment of the new Biblia Hebraica is dedicated to discussing textual variants. As can be seen from the long bibliography, the author has digested much scholarly literature. The Irish editor of Deuteronomy is an expert in Old Testament tex- tual criticism, and his competence is evident on every page. Since the base text continues to be that of the Codex Leningradensis, the most valuable part of the new edition is the improved apparatus (placed, as before, below the text) and especially the detailed textual commentary. With Adrian Schenker as the project leader and general editor, there is no doubt that more fascicles of the same high standard of quality will be available before long. Meanwhile, readers of the book of Deuteronomy are well served by the present volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Concordia Theological Monthly
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL MONTHLY The Secret of God's Plan HARRY G. COINER The Christ-Figure in Contemporary Literamre DONALD L. DEFFNER Homiletics Theological Observer Book Review VOL. XXXIV May 1963 No.5 BO:)TF T\ T'"t TT"SW All books received in this pe1'iodical may be procured from or through Concordia Pub­ lishing Hottse, 3558 South Jefferson Avenue. St. Louis 18, Missomi. THE WORLD OF THE VATICAN. By Trinity (misteriosamente emparentada na 01'­ Robert Neville. New York: Harper and dem da Uniao hipostdtica com toda a Trini­ Row, c. 1962. 256 pages, plus 16 full­ dade beatissima)" (Acta Apostolicae Sedis, 38 page plates. Cloth. $4.95. [1946}, 266). In 1954 Pius XII created not Here is a veteran foreign correspondent's "the Feast of Mary of Heaven and Earth" brisk, chatty (sometimes almost gossipy), (p. 77) but the "Feast of Mary the Queen" journalistic chronicle of Vatican City and the (Ad caeli reginam, in Acta .1postolicae Sedis, Holy See from the latter years of the pon­ 46 [1954}, 638). The Latin formula at the tificate of Pius XII to the threshold of the imposition of the tiara is misspelled and mis­ Second Vatican Council. The author is the translated on p. 118. There are 379 volumes knowledgeable and experienced former chief (plus indices) in Jacques-Paul Migne's two of the Ti,.>ze-Li!e .i3ure2.ll in Rome; his in­ Patrologies; f _. work is not "an structive and perceptive book will provide exhaustive anthology[!}" (p.142). On page the reader with valuable background for a 230 "Bishop H"u~ ;:::; :;:'~~j<:" is called Presi­ better understanding of recent and current dent of the German Lutheran Federation [!l Roman Catholic history.
    [Show full text]
  • Erudition, Antiquity, and the Enlightenment in Rome, Ca. 1600-Ca
    Erudition, Antiquity, and the Enlightenment in Rome, ca. 1600-ca. 1800. Theodor Dunkelgrün / Timothy Twining / Felix Waldmann, Cambridge, 07.06.2018. Reviewed by Stefan Bauer Published on H-Soz-u-Kult (June, 2018) Historians of scholarship met in the Old Di‐ an calendar reform to what he termed the “Grego‐ vinity School at St John’s College, Cambridge, to rian scriptural reform”. exchange their views on “Erudition, Antiquity, The paper by PIET VAN BOXEL (Oxford) be‐ and The Enlightenment in Rome, ca. 1600-ca. gan with the observation that the Latin Vulgate 1800”. The themes this conference aimed to pon‐ authorised by Pope Sixtus V in 1590 was met with der were the relationship between erudition and severe criticism. The Jesuit theologian Robert Bel‐ the Christian confessions, the impact of censor‐ larmine formulated a set of text-critical rules for ship on scholarly practices, and the place of erudi‐ the revision of the Vulgate. He was convinced of tion in the emergence of the Roman Enlighten‐ the importance of variant readings for the estab‐ ment. Special attention was given to biblical lishment of a reliable text, an idea that resonates scholarship – and its censorship – in early modern in his preface to the Sixto-Clementine Vulgate Rome. (1592). Van Boxel called particular attention to a THEODOR DUNKELGRÜN (Cambridge) point‐ manuscript in the Archives of the Gregorian Uni‐ ed out the paradox created by the Catholic Church versity in Rome, which contains Bellarmine’s at the Council of Trent (1546), which decreed that notes regarding his teaching on Genesis in Leu‐ only the Latin Vulgate translated by Jerome was ven.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Denial of the Free Offer
    The Historical Denial of the Free Offer Modern Calvinist leaders who teach the free offer usually claim that they have support from historic Reformed theology. This is false. They frequently claim that Calvin supports their position and that the chief Reformed standards justify their claims. All this is false also. Historic Calvinism, both in its accepted standards and as expressed by its main theologians, denies the free offer; indeed, it would recognise the teaching of modern free offer preachers as Amyraldism, and condemn it as error. Now such is the lack of knowledge on these matters amongst today’s churchgoers that my claims here must be evidenced. I am happy to comply with this to demonstrate the truth. This paper is written to show what the foremost Reformed standards and theologians teach regarding the free offer. What is the free offer? The free offer is the teaching that: 1. God has a good intent to reprobates. 2. God loves all men without exception. 3. God desires, and even wills, the salvation of all men. 4. God gives grace to all men to some degree. To this the following is at least implied: 1. The atonement of Christ is universal in scope; he died for all. 2. Conversion is conditioned upon the will of the sinner. The Arminian basis of this theology is plain to see. Where does this come from? This teaching was once restricted to those who followed the school of Moses Amyraut (or Amyrald, 1596-1664) who sought to unite the universalism of Lutherans with the sovereign particularity of Calvinists.
    [Show full text]
  • Thy Word Is Still Truth: Essential Writings on the Doctrine of Scripture from the Reformation to Today Peter A
    Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville Alumni Book Gallery 10-28-2013 Thy Word Is Still Truth: Essential Writings on the Doctrine of Scripture from the Reformation to Today Peter A. Lillback Richard B. Gaffinr J . Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/alum_books Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Lillback, Peter A. and Gaffin, Richard B. Jr., "Thy Word Is Still Truth: Essential Writings on the Doctrine of Scripture from the Reformation to Today" (2013). Alumni Book Gallery. 305. https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/alum_books/305 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Alumni Book Gallery by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thy Word Is Still Truth: Essential Writings on the Doctrine of Scripture from the Reformation to Today Keywords Bible, doctrine Disciplines Biblical Studies | Religion | Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Publisher P & R Publishing Publisher's Note Reprinted from Thy Word Is Still Truth: Essential Writings on the Doctrine of Scripture from the Reformation to Today edited by Peter A. Lillback and Richard B. Gaffinr J ., copyright 2013, P&R Publishing, Phillipsburg, NJ. ISBN 9781596384477 This book is available at DigitalCommons@Cedarville: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/alum_books/305
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Calvinism: B
    Introduction A. Special Terminology I. The Persons Understanding Calvinism: B. Distinctive Traits A. John Calvin 1. Governance Formative Years in France: 1509-1533 An Overview Study 2. Doctrine Ministry Years in Switzerland: 1533-1564 by 3. Worship and Sacraments Calvin’s Legacy III. Psycology and Sociology of the Movement Lorin L Cranford IV. Biblical Assessment B. Influencial Interpreters of Calvin Publication of C&L Publications. II. The Ideology All rights reserved. © Conclusion INTRODUCTION1 Understanding the movement and the ideology la- belled Calvinism is a rather challenging topic. But none- theless it is an important topic to tackle. As important as any part of such an endeavour is deciding on a “plan of attack” in getting into the topic. The movement covered by this label “Calvinism” has spread out its tentacles all over the place and in many different, sometimes in conflicting directions. The logical starting place is with the person whose name has been attached to the label, although I’m quite sure he would be most uncomfortable with most of the content bearing his name.2 After exploring the history of John Calvin, we will take a look at a few of the more influential interpreters of Calvin over the subsequent centuries into the present day. This will open the door to attempt to explain the ideology of Calvinism with some of the distinctive terms and concepts associated exclusively with it. I. The Persons From the digging into the history of Calvinism, I have discovered one clear fact: Calvinism is a religious thinking in the 1500s of Switzerland when he lived and movement that goes well beyond John Calvin, in some worked.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies
    Bulletin of the International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies Volume 38 • 2005 Articles The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Septuagint....................... 1 John William Wevers The Septuagint in the Peshitta and Syro-Hexapla Translations of Amos 1:3–2:16 ..................................... 25 Petra Verwijs Tying It All Together: The Use of Particles in Old Greek Job......... 41 Claude Cox Rhetoric and Poetry in Greek Ecclesiastes....................... 55 James K. Aitken Calque-culations—Loan Words and the Lexicon.................. 79 Cameron Boyd-Taylor Gleanings of a Septuagint Lexicographer....................... 101 Takamitsu Muraoka Dissertation Abstract The Septuagint’s Translation of the Hebrew Verbal System in Chronicles.........................................109 Roger Blythe Good IOSCS Matters Program in Leiden....................................... 111 Executive Committee Meeting............................... 115 Business Meeting........................................ 118 Executive Report on Critical Texts............................ 119 Treasurer’s Report ....................................... 123 In memoriam Pierre Sandevoir............................... 127 i ii BIOSCS 38 (2005) Book Reviews Review of Adam Kamesar, Jerome, Greek Scholarship and the Hebrew Bible ...................................... 129 Alison Salvesen Review of Kristin De Troyer, Rewriting the Sacred Text: What the Old Greek Texts Tell Us about the Literary Growth of the Bible ..... 132 Robert J. V. Hiebert Review of Maarten J. J. Menken,
    [Show full text]
  • Judaism and Enlightenment
    JUDAISM AND ENLIGHTENMENT ADAM SUTCLIFFE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge cb2 1rp, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge, cb2 2ru,UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, vic 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon´ 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C AdamSutcliffe 2003 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2003 Printed in the United Kingdomat the University Press, Cambridge Typeface Adobe Garamond 11/12.5 pt System LATEX 2ε [tb] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data This book is published with the generous support of the Koret Jewish Studies Publication Programof the Koret Foundation isbn 0 521 82015 4 hardback Contents List of illustrations page ix Acknowledgements xi List of abbreviations xiv Introduction: disentangling Judaismand Enlightenment 1 parti: the crumbling of old certainties: judaism, the bible and the meaning of history 1 The crisis and decline of Christian Hebraism 23 2 Hebraic politics: Respublica Mosaica 42 3 Meaning and method: Jewish history, world history
    [Show full text]
  • Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel
    Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel Volume 1 (2012)–4 (2015) Tables of Contents Volume 1, issue 1 Moses David M. Carr The Moses Story: Literary Historical Reflections 7–36 Erhard Blum Der historische Mose und die Frühgeschichte Israels 37–63 Thomas Römer Tracking Some “Censored” Moses Traditions Inside and Outside the Hebrew Bible 64–76 James Kugel The Figure of Moses in Jubilees 77–92 Carl S. Ehrlich “Noughty” Moses: A Decade of Moses Scholarship 2000–2010 93–110 New Projects Jens Kamlah, Neuere Forschungen zur Archäologie in Südphönizien 113–132 Israel Finkelstein et al., Reconstructing Ancient Israel: Integrating Macro- and Micro-archaeology 133–150 II Volume 1, issue 2 Volume 1, issue 2 Ezekiel Oded Lipschits Introduction 151–153 Marvin A. Sweeney Ezekiel’s Conceptualization of the Exile in Intertextual Perspective 154–172 Daniel I. Block The Tender Cedar Sprig: Ezekiel on Jehoiachin 173–202 Dalit Rom-Shiloni Ezekiel and Jeremiah: What Might Stand Behind the Silence? 203–230 Jacqueline E. Lapsley Body Piercings: The Priestly Body and the “Body” of the Temple in Ezekiel 231–245 Karl-Friedrich Pohlmann Synchrone und diachrone Texterschließung im Ezechielbuch 246–270 New Findings Zvi Greenhut, Recent Archeological Discoveries from Iron Age Sites in Jerusalem, Israel 273–286 New Projects Nathan MacDonald, Early Jewish Monotheism Research Group at the Georg-August Universität Göttingen 289–294 Volume 1, issue 3 Reception History Carol A. Newsom Editorial 295–297 John F.A. Sawyer A Critical Review of Recent Projects and Publications 298–326 Volume 1, issue 4 III Hermann Spieckermann From Biblical Exegesis to Reception History 327–350 Gary A.
    [Show full text]