Intuition: the Case of the Unknown Daughter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Intuition: the Case of the Unknown Daughter INVESTIGATIVE FILES JOE NICKELL Intuition: The Case of the Unknown Daughter n the fall of 2003, my life Much effort has been was transformed by the news expended in the search for that I was the father of a extrasensory phenomena, in- I cluding the pioneering work of beautiful, thirry-six-year-old daughter. She had confronted Britain's Society for Psychical her mother on the basis of "intu- Research (SPR), founded in ition" that told her the man who 1882, and the scientific helped raise her was not her research of Dr. J.B. Rhine at actual father. Instead, as soon Duke University in the 1930s. proved by DNA testing, we dis- Rhine was a sincere and dedi- covered that she was my child. cated, but credulous, para- As one who had long been skep- psychologist. His first pub- tical of much that is labeled lished report on the subject, co- intuition, I had to admit that authored with his wife Louisa, The author and his daughter, who sensed her father through intuition. something had just happened— was "An investigation of a something both wonderful and mysteri- that people have auras (or energy fields) 'Mind-Reading' Horse," ap- ous. With the approval and assistance of that stem from a larger "universal energy pearing in 1929. They believed the my daughter, Cherette, I decided to inves- flow" which the ancient Chinese termed mare. Lady Wonder, was telepathic. tigate. As I learned, understanding intu- chi. "Connecting with your intuition," However, magician and paranormal ition depends in part on how it is defined. she declares, "is the act of tuning in to investigator Milbourne Christopher the never-ending flow of universal (1970, 39-54) visited Lady undercover Sixth Sense? energy." Intuition has frequencies, she and determined that she simply To New Age writers like Patricia explains, and so, "In a sense, tuning in to tesponded to subde cues used by her Einstein, author of Intuition: The Path of intuition is like tuning in to a radio sta- owner to telay information that had Inner Wisdom (2003), intuition is an tion" (Einstein 2002, 1-2, 40-41, 105). been gleaned from the subjects. "inner awareness" that functions as a Actually, Patricia Einstein is no Rhine's later card tests engendered "sixth sense"—that is, a form of extrasen- Einstein. Although she insists that considerable controversy, but proof of sory perception that includes psychome- "Instances of psychic healing and psy- ESP did not materialize (Christopher try (an alleged psychic skill in which chokinesis (telepathic movement of 1970, 19-37). Despite the work of oth- information is gleaned about people, or objects) have been well documented" ers who have followed in Rhine's foot- even places or events, by touching (Einstein 2002, 37), she herself provides steps, ESP remains unproved, and its objects that are associated with them). no documentation. In fact, such claims existence has not been accepted by main- Like other New Agers, she maintains have been repeatedly discredited. For stream science. (See for example, Kurtz instance, many ballyhooed psycho- 1985; Hansel 1989; Stenger 1990.) Joe Nickell is CSICOP's Senior Research kinetic marvels have been exposed as the Nevertheless, the belief that intuition Fellow. More of his "Investigative Files" product of deceivers using magic tricks is a psychic process persists. It ranges columns appear in Skeptical Briefs. (Randi 1982; Korem 1988). from the relatively harmless, such as 1 2 March/April 2005 SKEPTICAL INQUIRER New Age shops touting gemstones like at die realization of some larger concept. sion on her mother's face that Cherette hematite and tiger's eye as having the No single piece of information may be then read, unconsciously. At least it sub- power to enhance intuition, to the dan- sufficient, but, taken together, the clues tly presented, however obliquely, die gerous, such as "medical intuitives" who may produce something greater than the issue of genetics. claim to diagnose illness by reading a sum of its parts. In June 2003, while she was talking person's aura (Nickell 2001). In using intuition, because we are on the phone with her mother, die fact not consciously (i.e., deliberately and diat she was conceived before her par- Dual Processing analytically) processing data, the result ents were married again came up. She Bui if intuition is not a sixth sense, what can be quite startling—bordering on said she did not care about that, so long is it? Does it exist at all? Do people revelation and seeming quite mysteri- as her father was indeed her father. Her merely make guesses, then count the ous. When my daughter's mother, mother assured her that that was so and hits and disregard the misses? Certainly, Diana, asked her why she thought her that he had raised her. In a way that our hunches are not always accurate. father was not really hers, she replied, "I would be appreciated by fortunetellers Elizabeth Loftus, past president of the don't know. It just came into my mind." using "cold reading" (an artful method American Psychological Society, cau- of fishing for information), Cherette tions: "Intuition is hot. But often it is Identifying the Clues thought she detected some possible equivocation and challenged: "What perilously wrong." She recommends the In the case of my daughter's intuition, I else haven't you told me?" and "Mom, book Intuition by David Myers who, she sought to identify the clues that might who is my daddy?" states, "marshals classic and contempo- have led to her sense of "knowing" that rary science and masterfully shows us she had a different father. Soon, Diana conceded there was a why." And skeptic Michael Shermer Diana describes her in growing up, as chance it was someone else, but that wrote for the Los Angeles Times Book not having much of a "whimsical there were only "two possibilities": If her Review, "Myers' book brilliantly estab- mode," but instead being typically seri- father was not her actual father, she said, lishes intuition as a legitimate subject of ous and inquisitive. Among the things then it was a young poet she had been scientific inquiry." she wondered about were her eyes, with for a short time before resuming As Myers relates, many studies show which matched neither her father's nor her relationship with her old boyfriend, that quick, impressionistic judge- her mother's. (See photo. They resemble Cherette's supposed father. At this, ments—while often mistaken—can my ancestors' even more than mine.) Cherette says, she felt that she probably nevertheless predict some behaviors Although many people remarked that did have a different father, and by the time her mother had tracked me down more successfully than rationally ana- she and her sister did not look like sis- both were convinced I was indeed lyzed ones. Myers (2002, 4) observes ters, she knew she resembled her mother Cherette's "Daddy" (as she now calls that we have two quite different ways of and did not become suspicious of her me)—a fact we confirmed by DNA test- knowing things. He explains: parentage—at least not consciously. ing.' (Not entirely lost on me during our Nevertheless, her younger brother was ... [RJecent cognitive science reveals Thanksgiving 2003 first meeting was a fascinating unconscious mind— adopted, so at some point die idea that die irony that as a paranormal investiga- another mind backstage—that Freud she could have been adopted too would tor I was myself being investigated—the never told us about. More than we have presented itself. (In fact, her sister realized over a decade ago, thinking result of intuition, no less!) occurs not on stage, but offstage, out once thought all three were adopted.) of sight. [Sjtudies of "automatic There were other clues. At Cherette's priming," "implicit memory," "heuris- wedding, when she was twenty-six, a Assessment tics," "spontaneous trait inference," friend of her mother's inadvertently Although not arrived at consciously, right-brain processing, instant emo- tions, nonverbal communication, and revealed a family secret: that her parents nevertheless my daughter's sense that creativity unveil our intuitive capaci- had not been married when she was she might have had a different father ties. Thinking, memory, and attitudes conceived. Again, that bit of informa- could logically be inferred from the data: all operate on two levels (conscious tion was not in itself very revealing, but That her brothet was adopted raised the and deliberate, and unconscious and automatic)—dual processing, today's it can now be seen as potentially sugges- question of her own parentage; since she researchers call it. We know more than tive, another piece of the puzzle. resembled her mother but not her we know we know. Following some medical tests, in father, and especially since her eyes were March 2001, she announced to her not similar to either's, she could expect As noted psychologist Robert A. mother diat she had learned her blood that she might have a different father; Baker told me—with specific reference type. Aldiough she did not then ask her that possibility was enhanced by her to my daughter's intuitive revelation— parents' blood type—so she did not yet parents not having been married when we humans are constantly responding to know hers was different from each of theirs and incompatible with her subtle cues. Unconsciously, we collect INTUITION.- CASE OF THE and assemble bits of data—much like father's—nevertheless the announce- UNKNOWN DAUGHTER pieces of a jigsaw puzzle—often arriving ment may have put a thoughtful expres- Continued on page 33 SKEPTICAL INQUIRER March/April 2005 13 (The absence of a flash was later confirmed when data were an asteroid is on a collision course with Earth, but a few para- released from sensitive surveillance satellites that constandy graphs later it is revealed the the probability of the impact is scan Earth from above.) They also evidently did not make only one in 100,000.
Recommended publications
  • 1952 Washington UFO Sightings • Psychic Pets and Pet Psychics • the Skeptical Environmentalist Skeptical Inquirer the MAGAZINE for SCIENCE and REASON Volume 26,.No
    1952 Washington UFO Sightings • Psychic Pets and Pet Psychics • The Skeptical Environmentalist Skeptical Inquirer THE MAGAZINE FOR SCIENCE AND REASON Volume 26,.No. 6 • November/December 2002 ppfjlffl-f]^;, rj-r ci-s'.n.: -/: •:.'.% hstisnorm-i nor mm . o THE COMMITTEE FOR THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION OF CLAIMS OF THE PARANORMAL AT THE CENTER FOR INQUIRY-INTERNATIONAL (ADJACENT TO THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO) • AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Paul Kurtz, Chairman; professor emeritus of philosophy. State University of New York at Buffalo Barry Karr, Executive Director Joe Nickell, Senior Research Fellow Massimo Polidoro, Research Fellow Richard Wiseman, Research Fellow Lee Nisbet Special Projects Director FELLOWS James E. Alcock,* psychologist. York Univ., Consultants, New York. NY Irmgard Oepen, professor of medicine Toronto Susan Haack. Cooper Senior Scholar in Arts (retired), Marburg, Germany Jerry Andrus, magician and inventor, Albany, and Sciences, prof, of philosophy, University Loren Pankratz, psychologist, Oregon Health Oregon of Miami Sciences Univ. Marcia Angell, M.D., former editor-in-chief. C. E. M. Hansel, psychologist. Univ. of Wales John Paulos, mathematician, Temple Univ. New England Journal of Medicine Al Hibbs, scientist, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Steven Pinker, cognitive scientist, MIT Robert A. Baker, psychologist. Univ. of Douglas Hofstadter, professor of human Massimo Polidoro, science writer, author, Kentucky understanding and cognitive science, executive director CICAP, Italy Stephen Barrett, M.D., psychiatrist, author. Indiana Univ. Milton Rosenberg, psychologist, Univ. of consumer advocate, Allentown, Pa. Gerald Holton, Mallinckrodt Professor of Chicago Barry Beyerstein,* biopsychologist, Simon Physics and professor of history of science, Wallace Sampson, M.D., clinical professor of Harvard Univ. Fraser Univ., Vancouver, B.C., Canada medicine, Stanford Univ., editor, Scientific Ray Hyman.* psychologist, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • In Dogs We Trust? Intersubjectivity, Response-Able Relations, and the Making of Mine Detector Dogs
    Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 50(1), 1–36 Winter 2014 View this article online at Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/jhbs.21642 C 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. ⃝ IN DOGS WE TRUST? INTERSUBJECTIVITY, RESPONSE-ABLE RELATIONS, AND THE MAKING OF MINE DETECTOR DOGS ROBERT G. W. KIRK The utility of the dog as a mine detector has divided the mine clearance community since dogs were first used for this purpose during the Second World War. This paper adopts a his- torical perspective to investigate how, why, and to what consequence, the use of minedogs remains contested despite decades of research into their abilities. It explores the changing factors that have made it possible to think that dogs could, or could not, serve as reliable detectors of landmines over time. Beginning with an analysis of the wartime context that shaped the creation of minedogs, the paper then examines two contemporaneous investi- gations undertaken in the 1950s. The first, a British investigation pursued by the anatomist Solly Zuckerman, concluded that dogs could never be the mine hunter’s best friend. The second, an American study led by the parapsychologist J. B. Rhine, suggested dogs were potentially useful for mine clearance. Drawing on literature from science studies and the emerging subdiscipline of “animal studies,” it is argued that cross-species intersubjectivity played a significant role in determining these different positions. The conceptual landscapes of Zuckerman and Rhine’s disciplinary backgrounds are shown to have produced distinct approaches to managing cross-species relations, thus explaining how diverse opinions on minedog can coexist.
    [Show full text]
  • Use It! Don't Lose It
    7th Grade IP 612-2 UseUse It!It! Don’tDon’t LoseLose It!It! DAILY LANGUAGE PRACTICE By Marjorie Frank Use It! Don’t Lose It! LANGUAGE Daily Skills Practice Grade 7 by Marjorie Frank Thanks to Erin Linton for her assistance in researching topics, checking facts, and tracking down trivia. Illustrated by Kathleen Bullock Cover by Geoffrey Brittingham Edited by Jill Norris Copy edited by Cary Grayson ISBN 978-0-86530-652-3 Copyright ©2006 by Incentive Publications, Inc., Nashville, TN. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without written permission from Incentive Publications, Inc., with the exception below. Pages labeled with the statement ©2006 by Incentive Publications, Inc., Nashville, TN are intended for reproduction. Permission is hereby granted to the purchaser of one copy of USE IT! DON’T LOSE IT! LANGUAGE DAILY SKILLS PRACTICE 7 to reproduce these pages in sufficient quantities for meeting the purchaser’s own classroom needs only. 2345678910 090807 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA www.incentivepublications.com Don’t let those language skills get lost or rusty! As a teacher you work hard to teach language skills to your students. Your students work hard to master them. Do you worry that your students will forget the material as you move on to the next concept? If so, here’s a plan for you and your students—one that will keep those skills sharp. Use It! Don’t Lose It! provides daily language practice for all the basic skills.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GOLDEN TOUCH Rolling with the Lords of the Craps Table by Mattathias Schwartz
    (71-78)Schwartz Final2 10/23/08 3:04 PM Page 71 LETTER FROM CHICAGO THE GOLDEN TOUCH Rolling with the lords of the craps table By Mattathias Schwartz For the gambler, dice have long been and their own steak-fed bodies, grad- The Golden Touch Craps team had the best machine with which to turn a ually transforming the beige void of scheduled one of their “Crap$ 101” small amount of energy into a large the Allegheny Room into a miniature courses to begin the following day. In amount of uncertainty. For the philoso- casino, a school for the study of dice Crap$ 101, novice players receive two pher, there is no days of hands-on handier piece of instruction in Gold- rhetoric with which en Touch betting to evoke the foggy systems, Golden relations between Touch visualization God and universe, techniques, and, universe and man, most important, or man and his own the Golden Touch affairs. And so as I “controlled throw,” watched two mem- a method of retain- bers of the Golden ing influence over Touch Craps team the dice after they construct a dice pit leave the hand. in a windowless Tuition is $1,495, conference room of which does not in- the Hyatt Regency clude room, board, O’Hare, I could not or a ticket to Chica- help but feel as go O’Hare; but with though I were wit- eight coaches and nessing the creation sixteen students, of a universe, a the student-to- green, felt-covered, faculty ratio bests racetrack-shaped the Ivy League.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Sight” Illusion, Media, and Mediums Katharina Rein Bauhaus Universitat Weimar, [email protected]
    communication +1 Volume 4 Issue 1 Occult Communications: On Article 8 Instrumentation, Esotericism, and Epistemology September 2015 Mind Reading in Stage Magic: The “Second Sight” Illusion, Media, and Mediums Katharina Rein Bauhaus Universitat Weimar, [email protected] Abstract This article analyzes the late-nineteenth-century stage illusion “The Second Sight,” which seemingly demonstrates the performers’ telepathic abilities. The illusion is on the one hand regarded as an expression of contemporary trends in cultural imagination as it seizes upon notions implied by spiritualism as well as utopian and dystopian ideas associated with technical media. On the other hand, the spread of binary code in communication can be traced along with the development of the "Second Sight," the latter being outlined by means of three examples using different methods to obtain a similar effect. While the first version used a speaking code to transmit information, the other two were performed silently, relying on other ways of communication. The article reveals how stage magic, technical media, spiritualism, and mind reading were interconnected in the late nineteenth century, and drove each other forward. Keywords stage magic, media, spiritualism, telepathy, telegraphy, telephony This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Rein / The “Second Sight” Illusion, Media, and Mediums Despite stage magic’s continuous presence in popular culture and its historical significance as a form of entertainment, it has received relatively little academic attention. This article deals with a late-nineteenth-century stage illusion called “The Second Sight” which seemingly demonstrates the performers’ ability to read each other’s minds.
    [Show full text]
  • NYU.1287 Style Guide 5.13
    C O U R T E S Y T H E R H I N E R E S E A R C H C E N T E R A R C H I V E IN S P R nonfiction I BELIEVE IT OR NOT N AUTHOR STACY HORN EXPLORES A LABORATORY’S INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE PARANORMAL by Renée Alfuso / CAS ’06 n January 15, 1949, he supposed yet another theory: the scientists’ juiciest encounters, T a 13-year-old Mary - The boy himself was behind the from the bizarre (a telepathic horse land boy began phenomena, whether through named Lady Wonder) to the heart - Odemonstrating dis - simple trickery or perhaps psy - breaking (a fame-hungry psychic turbing behavior— chokinesis (the ability to move who strung along the parents of he would projectile vomit and objects via brainpower). Rhine, a missing boy). speak in foreign languages, his bed considered “the Einstein of the A frequent contributor to shook violently, and words ap - paranormal,” believed more in the NPR’s All Things Considered , Horn peared scratched into his body. If abilities of the human mind than was drawn to the once-prominent the events sound familiar it’s be - he did in ghosts. He struggled his lab by her fascination with forgot - cause they would later become whole life to bring psychical re - ten stories, which gives her writ - the basis for the classic horror film search away from the fringe and ing the tone of investigative The Exorcist (1973) and, sure into the realm of science, and is journalism despite a background enough, the boy’s deeply religious the central character of Unbeliev - in telecommunications.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Psi Research
    A Short History of Psi Research by Robert Todd Carroll Interest in the scientific study of psychical phenomena—as they were called in the 19th century—began with a movement known as spiritism or spiritualism in upstate New York in 1848 with the Fox Sisters: Kate, Margaretta, and Leah. Kate (age 12) and Margaretta (15) claimed to hear strange rapping noises in their bedroom. They convinced a few folks that they were getting messages from spirits. Soon they hit the road, managed by big sister Leah who was in her mid-30s. They went on tour performing séances, which became the rage in both the U.S. and Europe. In the 19th century, several eminent scientists, including biologist Alfred Russell Wallace (1823-1913) and chemist Sir William Crookes (1832-1919), became interested in spirit communication. Both claimed that they had scientific demonstrations for the existence of psychic phenomena such as spirits tilting tables. In 1871, Crookes attended a Fox-girls séance in London and reported: “I have tested [the raps] in every way that I could devise, until there has been no escape from the conviction that they were true objective occurrences not produced by trickery or mechanical means” (Crookes 1874). In 1888, the sisters confessed that they had produced the raps by cracking their toe-joints and that they made bumping noises by fastening an apple to a string under their petticoats and surreptitiously bouncing it off the floor. This would not be the last time an eminent scientist was tricked by a subject of psychical research. 2 Crookes became interested in spiritualism after the death of his brother.
    [Show full text]
  • The Horse That Won't Go Away. Clever Hans, Facilitated
    The Horse That Won’t Go Away Clever Hans, Facilitated Communication, and the Need for Clear Thinking Thomas E. Heinzen William Paterson University Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University Susan A. Nolan Seton Hall University heinzen_fm.indd 1 11/24/14 1:20 PM Publisher: Rachel Losh Senior Acquisitions Editor: Daniel DeBonis Development Editor: Elsa Peterson Editorial Assistant: Katie Pachnos Senior Marketing Manager: Lindsay Johnson Marketing Assistant: Allison Greco Director of Editing, Design, and Media Production: Tracey Kuehn Managing Editor: Lisa Kinne Production Editor: Janice Stangel Production Manager: Sarah Segal Photo Editor: Richard Fox Art Director: Diana Blume Interior and Cover Designer: Kevin Kall Art Manager: Matthew McAdams Illustrations: Lachina Composition: Linda Harms Printing and Binding: RR Donnelley Library of Congress Preassigned Control Number: 2014956522 ISBN-10: 1-4641-4574-1 ISBN-13: 978-1-4641-4574-2 © 2015 by Worth Publishers All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America First printing Worth Publishers 41 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10010 www.worthpublishers.com heinzen_fm.indd 2 11/24/14 1:20 PM For Michael Brown –Tom Heinzen To James Randi, tireless and fearless slayer of myths – Scott Lilienfeld For Ranko Bojanic – Susan Nolan heinzen_fm.indd 3 11/24/14 1:20 PM a b o u t t h e a u t h o r s Thomas E. Heinzen is Professor of Psychology at William Paterson University of New Jersey. A graduate of Rockford College, he earned his Ph.D. in social psychology at the State University of New York at Albany. After publishing his first book on frustration and creativity in government, Heinzen worked as a public policy research associate, consulted for the Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth, and then began his teaching career.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARLES FORT: 1932) Began the Work That Led One Biographer to Call PROPHET of the Him the “Prophet of the Unexplained” (Knight 1970)
    A handful of twentieth-century figures “created” the modern concept of the paranormal and its leading topics, transporting fantasy, myth, or speculation into a kind of believable “reality.” Most proved to be a chimera. JOE NICKELL uch of what is called “the paranormal” today has intrigued mankind since the most ancient times. The term refers to those things that are supposedly beyond the normal range of science and human experience—ghosts, strange lights in the sky, psychic phenomena, and the like. It includes the super- Mnatural but also things such as monsters that—if they exist—might be quite natural. With the advent of modern spiritualism in 1848, launched by the Fox Sisters’ hoaxed messages from the ghost of a murdered peddler (Nickell 2004, 31–32), the paranormal began to proliferate and to attract advocacy groups such as the British Society for Psychical Research. Founded in London in 1882, it was concerned with alleged psychic phenomena and the supposed survival of consciousness following bodily death (Guiley 2000, 304). The paranormal grew increasingly throughout the twentieth century with various “new” (either substantially new or newly refocused-on) topics being expanded by individual gurus and groups of enthusiasts, and many cross-correspondences developing (say, between UFOs and Bigfoot). This article is a discussion of the “creation” of the paranormal by a series of major figures, each of whom took a concept—some fantasy, myth, or specula- tion—and transformed it into “reality” (Keel 2001b). (I have, of course, excluded a long list of topics—from astrol- ogy to zombies—whose origins are ancient.) In the early twentieth century, Charles Fort (1874– CHARLES FORT: 1932) began the work that led one biographer to call PROPHET OF THE him the “Prophet of the Unexplained” (Knight 1970).
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Social Psychologists Think? 1
    How Do Social Psychologists Think? 1 1.1 TO WEAR OR NOT TO WEAR AN INEFFECTIVE MASK: THAT WAS THE QUESTION DURING THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC The Social Situation It will happen again. Social psychologists can help to prepare the public for the next pandemic. Steven Taylor’s (2019) book, The Psychology of Pandemics: Preparing for the Next Global Outbreak of Infectious Disease, provides specific guidance. Taylor’s book was published just prior to the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. But you can practice your social psychological skills now by searching for the dangerous, one-word assumption in the next sentence about recommended behavior from the World Health Organization (WHO, 2019, p. 1): This document summarizes WHO’s recommendations for the rational use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in healthcare and community settings. The early WHO advice was offered on February 17, 2020, right as COVID-19 was ramping up in the United States. Their still useful advice described specific ways to avoid becoming infected with the virus: washing hands frequently with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, or using an alcohol-based hand rub if soap and water are not available; avoiding touching your eyes, nose, and mouth; practicing respiratory hygiene by coughing or sneezing into a bent elbow or tissue and then immediately disposing of the tissue; Do wearing not a face covering copy, if you have respiratorypost, symptoms or and performingdistribute hand hygiene after disposing of the covering; and maintaining social distance (a minimum of 2 meters or 6 feet) from individuals with respiratory symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Fred Robert Nadis 2002
    Copyright by Fred Robert Nadis 2002 The Dissertation Committee for Fred Robert Nadis Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Wonder Shows: Science, Religion and Magic on the American Stage, 1845-2001 Committee: ________________________________ Jeffrey Meikle, Supervisor ________________________________ Linda Henderson ________________________________ Bruce Hunt ________________________________ Robert Abzug ________________________________ Janet Davis Wonder Shows: Science, Religion and Magic on the American Stage, 1845-2001 by Fred Robert Nadis, M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May, 2002 PREFACE One of my more powerful childhood memories concerns a visit to Chicago's Museum of Science and Industry. Besides being impressed by the neo- classical building next to the lake and all the stone ladies holding up the roof on their heads, I recall a science demonstration that a young acne-afflicted woman in a smock offered in a small anteroom, possibly the gift shop. Among other tricks she placed a rose in a vial of liquid nitrogen, removed it, and struck it with a hammer—it then shattered as if made of stone or plaster. This unexpected and beautiful event evoked a sense of wonder in me. I was fascinated, both by the completely unexpected shattering of the rose, and that a young woman could control such strange cosmic forces. Her explanation of this and her many other demonstrations remain vague; but I now realize this was the first performance I had witnessed of what in this work I am calling a "wonder show." It did not make a scientist of me, as may have been the intention, but it did instill a proper sense of awe and appreciation for the possibilities technology and showmanship could provide.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Dehoaxing
    the Skeptical Inquirer THE ZETETIC Effects of Dehoaxing UFO Hoax / UFOs and the CIA Claims of Space Ancestors Don Juan and Piltdown Published by the Committee tor the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal VOL IV NO. 3 SPRING 1980 Editorial Board George Abell Martin Gardner Ray Hyman Philip J. Klass Paul Kurtz James Randi Editor Kendrick Frazier Assistant Editor Doris Hawley Doyle Consulting Editors James E. Alcock Isaac Asimov William Sims Bainbridge John Boardman Milbourne Christopher John R. Cole Richard de Mille Eric J. Dingwall C. E. M. Hansel E. C. Krupp James Oberg Robert Sheaffer Production Editor Betsy Offermann Business Manager Lynette Nisbet Staff Mary Rose Hays Kitty Turner THE SKEPTICAL INQUIRER (formerly THE ZETETIC) is the official journal of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP, Inc.). Manuscripts, letters, books for review, and editorial inquiries should be addressed to The Editor, THE SKEPTICAL INQUIRER, 3025 Palo Alto Dr., N.E., Albuquerque, New Mexico 87111. Subscriptions, changes of address, and advertising should be addressed to: THE SKEPTICAL INQUIRER, BOX 29, Kensington Station, Buffalo, N.Y. 14215. Old address as well as new are necessary for change of subscriber's address, with six weeks advance notice. Inquiries from the media about the work of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal should be made to the Executive Office, 1203 Kensington Avenue, Buffalo, New York 14215. Tel.: (716) 834-3223. Copyright © 1980 by The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal, 1203 Kensington Ave., Buffalo, New York 14215.
    [Show full text]