GDL Comparison Table
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Graham Holdings Company 2014 Annual Report
GRAHAM HOLDINGS 2014 ANNUAL REPORT REVENUE BY PRINCIPAL OPERATIONS n EDUCATION 61% n CABLE 23% n TELEVISION BROADCASTING 10% n OTHER BUSINESSES 6% FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (in thousands, except per share amounts) 2014 2013 Change Operating revenues $ 3,535,166 $ 3,407,911 4% Income from operations $ 407,932 $ 319,169 28% Net income attributable to common shares $ 1,292,996 $ 236,010 — Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations $ 138.88 $ 23.36 — Diluted earnings per common share $ 195.03 $ 32.05 — Dividends per common share $ 10.20 $ — — Common stockholders’ equity per share $ 541.54 $ 446.73 21% Diluted average number of common shares outstanding 6,559 7,333 –11% INCOME FROM NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE OPERATING REVENUES OPERATIONS TO COMMON SHARES ($ in millions) ($ in millions) ($ in millions) 3,861 582 1,293 3,453 3,535 3,373 3,408 408 314 319 149 277 236 116 131 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 RETURN ON DILUTED EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON COMMON SHARE FROM DILUTED EARNINGS STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY* CONTINUING OPERATIONS PER COMMON SHARE ($) ($) 46.6% 138.88 195.03 38.16 9.8% 9.0% 23.36 31.04 32.05 5.2% 17.32 4.4% 14.70 17.39 6.40 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 * Computed on a comparable basis, excluding the impact of the adjustment for pensions and other postretirement plans on average common stockholders’ equity. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 1 To OUR SHAREHOLDERS Quite a lot happened in 2014. -
The Student's Guide to the Leading Law Firms and Sets in the UK
2021 The student’s guide to the leading law firms and sets in the UK e-Edition chambers-student.com Connect with us on cbaK Travers Smith’s mix of formal and informal training is second to none. It enables those coming fresh from law school to quickly become familiar with complex concepts and provides them with the necessary tools to throw themselves into their team’s work right from the start. www.traverssmith.com 10 Snow Hill, London EC1A 2AL +44 (0) 20 7295 3000 Contents Law school The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) p.37 An introduction to the SQE with ULaw p.41 Solicitors’ timetable p.43 Barristers’ timetable p.44 The Graduate Diploma in Law (GDL) p.45 The Legal Practice Course (LPC) p.49 The Bar Course p.52 How to fund law school p.55 Law school course providers p.57 Contents https://www.chambersstudent.co.uk The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) From 2021 there’s going to be an entirely new way of qualifying as a solicitor replacing the GDL, LPC and training contract. If you’re thinking ‘SQE OMG!’ – don’t fear: here’s a quick guide. What’s going on? volve a practical testing ‘pilot’ with students. The regula- In winter 2016/17 the Solicitors Regulation Authority tor has stated that it expects various other providers (i.e. (SRA) dropped a bombshell on the legal profession: it was probably law schools and the current GDL/LPC providers) going ahead with its plan for the Solicitors Qualifying Ex- to offer preparatory courses for both stages of the SQE. -
Solicitor Apprenticeships Employer Fact Sheet
Academic excellence for business and the professions Solicitor Apprenticeships Employer Fact Sheet Overview of the Scheme The City Law School and CILEx Law School Trailblazer Solicitor Apprenticeships Trailblazer Solicitor Apprenticeships are The apprenticeship offers on and off the job are an exciting development for an exciting development for the legal learning consisting of work-based training the legal profession – both for profession – both for employers and the next and part-time studying. generation of solicitors. employers and the next generation In order to demonstrate their ability, of solicitors. In September 2015 the Department for apprentices will be rigorously assessed to Business, Innovation and Skills announced ensure they meet stringent requirements. The City Law School has been at the Legal Trailblazer Scheme which The City Law School has entered into a enables apprentices to qualify as a solicitor, unique partnership with CILEx Law School the forefront of the launch of this paralegal or chartered legal executive. to deliver a blended online and face-to-face new scheme since its introduction learning experience. in 2016. The City Law School successfully launched the programme in September 2016. The The City Law School is part of City, solicitor route allows students to sign University of London. City has a long up straight from school to a six year tradition of excellence in legal education programme, the completion of which will and in 2015 the National Student Survey lead to qualification as a solicitor. This is found that City was the top university in ‘Choosing an apprenticeship over the an alternative to the traditional routes of London for student satisfaction. -
Nottingham Law Journal
NOTTINGHAM LAW JOURNAL VOL. 19(1) 2010 Guest Editor Rebecca Huxley-Binns, LLB (Uclan), FHEA Editor Mr Tom Lewis, BA (Oxon), Solicitor Assistant Editor Ms Jane Jarman, BA (Leicester), ACIArb, Solicitor Advisory Board The Rt Hon the Lord Saville of Newdigate Prof Stephen Weatherill, University of Oxford Judge Bostjan Zupancic, the European Court of Human Rights The Rt Hon Sir Philip Otton Prof Mark Findlay, University of Sydney Prof Conor Gearty, London School of Economics Mr Jonathan Griffiths, Queen Mary & Westfield College, London Prof Michael J. Gunn, University of Derby Prof Martin Hunter, Essex Court Chambers & Nottingham Prof Geraint Howells, University of Manchester Law School Prof Peter Jones, Nottingham Trent University Mr Roger Leng, University of Warwick Prof Robert G. Lee, Cardiff Law School Mr Gary Watt, University of Warwick Miss Helen Milgate, Solicitor Prof Neil Peck, Attorney, Snell & Wilmer, Denver, Mr Christopher Muttukumaru, Director of Legal Col, USA & Nottingham Law School Services, Department of Transport Prof Barry Rider, University of Cambridge Prof John Peysner, University of Lincoln Mr Paul Smith, Partner, Eversheds Prof Mary Seneviratne, Nottingham Law School Mr John Snape, Warwick University Mr Marc S. Stauch, Leibnitz University, Hannover Dr Kim Stevenson, University of Plymouth Prof Adrian Walters, Nottingham Law School Dr Christian Twigg-Flesner, University of Hull Editorial Board Mr Graham Ferris, LLB (Nott), Solicitor Prof Ralph Henham LLB (Leicester), MA (Keele), MPhil (Nott), Ph D (Keele), Solicitor Ms Andrea Nicholson, LLB (Buckinghamshire), LLM (Durham) Miss Kay Wheat, BA (Reading), Solicitor Administrative Assistant Ms Carole Vaughan The Nottingham Law Journal is a refereed journal, normally published in Spring and Autumn each year. -
Manchester Floor Plan Manchester Exhibitors 2020
MANCHESTER EXHIBITORS 2020 MANCHESTER University of Aberdeen 1 Cardiff Metropolitan University 33 University of Leicester 82 University of Southampton 135 University of Wolverhampton 148 HIGHER EDUCATION Abertay University 2 University of Central Lancashire 34 University of Lincoln 80 Solent University (Southampton) 136 University of Winchester 160 EXHIBITION Aberystwyth University 5 Royal Central School of Speech and Drama 95 University of Liverpool 88 University of St Andrews 137 University of Worcester 161 The Academy of Contemporary Music 3 University of Chester 35 Liverpool Hope University 79 SGS College 139 University of York 162 3 – 4 MARCH 2020 Anglia Ruskin University 4 City, University of London 121 Staffordshire University 138 83 163 Arden University 6 Coventry University 36 University of Stirling 140 Aston University 7 University for the Creative Arts 40 LMA 91 University of Strathclyde 142 Bangor University 9 University of Cumbria 39 London Metropolitan University 81 University of Suffolk 141 Supported by Barnsley College 8 De MontFort University 38 London School of Economics University of Sunderland 143 CAREER AND APPRENTICESHIP 97 and Political Science University of Bath 10 University of Surrey 144 British Army H 89 Loughborough University 84 Bath Spa University 11 University of Sussex 146 Microsoft C UCEN Manchester 92 University of Bedfordshire 12 Swansea University 149 National Apprenticeship Service A University of Derby 41 The University of Manchester 85 In association with Birmingham City University 14 Teesside University -
Download PDF (40.2
JOBNAME: Mitsilegas PAGE: 8 SESS: 9 OUTPUT: Thu Feb 25 11:50:06 2016 Contributors Inés Armada, Ph.D researcher at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Institut d’études Européennes de l’Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Belgium Petter Asp, Professor of Criminal Law, Faculty of Law, Stockholm University, Sweden Maria Bergström, Associate Professor of European Law and Senior Lecturer in EU Law, Faculty of Law, Uppsala University, Sweden Pedro Caeiro, Professor of Criminal Law and International and European Criminal Law, University of Coimbra; and Researcher at the University of Coimbra Institute for Legal Research (UCILeR), Portugal Iain Cameron, Professor of Public International Law, Faculty of Law, Uppsala University, Sweden Michèle Coninsx, President and National Member for Belgium, Eurojust, The Hague, the Netherlands Paul De Hert, Chair of Criminal Law, International and European Criminal Law and Historical Introduction to Eight Major Constitutional Systems, Vrije Universiteit Brussels (VUB), Belgium Elaine Fahey, Senior Lecturer in Law, Co-Director, Institute for the Study of European Law (ISEL), City Law School, City University, London, UK Elena Fasoli, Postgraduate Teaching Associate, Queen Mary University of London, UK Malgosia Fitzmaurice, Professor of Public International Law, Queen Mary University of London, UK Maria Fletcher, Senior Lecturer in European Law, School of Law, University of Glasgow, UK Francesca Galli, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University Sabine Gless, Prof. Dr. iur. Chair of Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure, Faculty of Law, University of Basel, Switzerland José A. Gutiérrez-Fons, Legal Secretary in the Chambers of President Koen Lenaerts, Court of Justice of the European Union, Luxembourg viii Valsamis Mitsilegas, Maria Bergström and Theodore Konstadinides - 9781783473311 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/29/2021 07:57:21AM via free access Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Mitsilegas-Research_handbook_on_EU_criminal_law / Division: Prelims /Pg. -
The Unpopularity of Property Law Modules: Popular Culture Offers Solutions
Athens Journal of Law - Volume 5, Issue 3 – Pages 241-254 The Unpopularity of Property Law Modules: Popular Culture offers Solutions * By Anna Chronopoulou The commodification of Legal Education and the popularity of law as a subject of study have been reflected in a plethora of law courses at undergraduate and postgraduate levels on offer in the English Universities. Property Law modules do not necessarily enjoy the same degree of popularity to other modules on a qualifying law degree in English Universities. Despite being slowly changing modules, Property Law modules did not remain unaffected by the commodification of legal education. As a result, Property Law became highly specialised. This quickly translated in optional modules such as: Succession Law, Housing Law, Landlord and Tenant Law, Construction Law etc. Nevertheless, Property Law modules remain highly unpopular among the student population in the English Universities. This paper examines the reasons for this by focusing on three parameters. The first parameter examines the nature of the subject itself as highly technical, therefore less adventurous and attractive. The second parameter brings forward the suggestion that neither legal educators nor researchers have actually successfully managed to break away from the monotony of Property Law subjects. The third parameter proposes solutions to the increasing unpopularity of these subjects. It puts forward the suggestion that a socio-legal approach to the subjects combined with appealing forms of popular culture might just increase the popularity of the subjects among the student population. Keywords: Legal Education, Property Law modules, Popular Culture Introduction Legal education has experienced a number of transformations in England and Wales over the last decades. -
What Do Imperial Materials Graduates Do?
What do Imperial Materials graduates do? There were 27 known destinations of the 2017 graduates (Home & EU students) Graph 1 – Destinations of 2017 graduates Number of responses Percentage Entered Employment 12 44.45% Entered Further Study/Training 11 40.75% Seeking Employment 1 3.7% Not Available for Employment/Study/Training 3 11.1% Graph 2 – Comparison with previous years 2014 2015 2016 2017 Entered Employment 27% 61% 42% 44.45% Entered Further Study/Training 50% 28% 35% 40.75% Seeking Employment 6% 11% 11% 3.7% Not Available for Employment/Study/Training 17% 0% 12% 11.1% Graph 3 – Sector of employment entered 2014 2015 2016 2017 Agriculture 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0% Oil/Mining 20.0% 0.0% 18.18% 0% Manufacture 20.0% 0.0% 18.18% 8.35% Utilities & Transport 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0% Technical Consultancy/R&D 0.0% 29.4% 0.0% 8.35% IT & Telecommunications 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0% Banking/Financial 20.0% 11.8% 9.09% 8.35% Accountancy 0.0% 5.9% 9.09% 16.65% Business & Management Consultancy 0.0% 5.9% 9.09% 16.65% Other Business Activities 20.0% 41.1% 9.09% 25% Public Administration/Defence 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0% Education 0.0% 5.9% 0.0% 16.65% Health/Social Work 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0% Others 20.0% 0.0% 27.27% 0% Careers Service www.imperial.ac.uk/careers Examples of employers and occupations for Materials graduates who entered employment Examples of Employers Examples of Occupations • Accenture • Business Analyst • Barclays PLC • Treasury Analyst • Brafe Engineering • Engineer • EY • Management Consultant • Imperial College London • Research Assistant • Kene Partners • Assistant Consultant • RSM - Corporate Finance • Analyst • Signature Flight Support • Management Accountant • Wyman Gordon Ltd. -
(Alternative Providers) of the University of Law October 2017
Higher Education Review (Alternative Providers) of The University of Law October 2017 Contents About this review ..................................................................................................... 1 Key findings .............................................................................................................. 2 Judgements .......................................................................................................................... 2 Good practice ....................................................................................................................... 2 Affirmation of action being taken ........................................................................................... 2 About the provider ................................................................................................... 3 Explanation of findings ............................................................................................ 5 1 Judgement: The setting and maintenance of the academic standards of awards ........... 5 2 Judgement: The quality of student learning opportunities ............................................. 15 3 Judgement: The quality of the information about learning opportunities ....................... 38 4 Judgement: The enhancement of student learning opportunities .................................. 41 Glossary .................................................................................................................. 45 The University of Law About this review This is a -
Hamzah Abu-Hassan
Hamzah Abu-Hassan Senior Associate Corporate and M&A Primary practice Corporate and M&A 29/09/2021 Hamzah Abu-Hassan | Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer About Hamzah Abu-Hassan <p><strong>Hamzah advises local and international clients on their corporate and commercial activities. </strong></p> <p>He is experienced in various aspects of the law focusing on private and public M&A, joint ventures, corporate structuring and regulatory matters, and providing general corporate advice.</p> <p>Hamzah has practised law in three different jurisdictions in the Middle East (Jordan, Qatar and UAE) and advised on transactions across the region.</p> <p>Hamzah is fluent in both Arabic and English.</p> Recent work <ul> <li>Advising Kuwait Finance House on its ongoing cross border acquisition by way of share swap of Ahli United Bank in Bahrain. The consolidation is set to create the largest banking entity in Kuwait with assets of $94bn.</li> <li>Advising First Gulf Bank on its merger with National Bank of Abu Dhabi creating First Abu Dhabi Bank, the largest bank in MENA region with US$175bn of assets and a combined market capitalization of approximately $29.1bn.</li> <li>Advising Al Hilal Bank in relation to a three-way merger with Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank and Union National Bank creating the third largest bank in the UAE, with total assets of $114bn.</li> <li>Advising Invest Bank in relation to a $1.1bn capital restructuring by way of strategic investment from the Government of Sharjah.</li> <li>Advising Barwa Bank in Qatar on its merger with International -
BPTC Providers Analysis
BPTC 2010/11 An analysis of students enrolled on the 2010/11 Bar Professional Training Course BPTC statistical report June 2012 Prepared by Bar Council Research Department 1 Tables of Contents Contents 1 BPTC Equality and Diversity Monitoring ............................................................... 6 Background and context ....................................................................................... 7 Purpose of the BPTC ............................................................................................ 7 Aims ..................................................................................................................... 8 Objectives ............................................................................................................. 8 BPTC admission requirements ............................................................................. 8 2 BPTC enrolment data ........................................................................................... 9 3 BPTC students by region of domicile .................................................................. 11 4 BPTC age of students ......................................................................................... 12 5 BPTC student disability ....................................................................................... 12 6 BPTC student gender ......................................................................................... 12 7 BPTC student ethnicity ...................................................................................... -
Pupillage Supplementary Survey 2010/11
Pupillage Survey 2010/11 An analysis of the backgrounds of pupils registered in 2010/11 Pupillage statistical report March 2012 Dr Jennifer Sauboorah and Caroline Carney Research Department 1 Table of Contents 1. Pupillage: the final stage of training for the Bar................................................................ 8 2. Pupillage registration figures ........................................................................................... 9 3. Equality and diversity monitoring data ........................................................................... 12 4. Age ................................................................................................................................ 13 5. Disability ........................................................................................................................ 14 6. Ethnicity ......................................................................................................................... 15 7. Gender .......................................................................................................................... 18 8. Sexual orientation .......................................................................................................... 19 9. Gender reassignment .................................................................................................... 19 10. Religion or belief ............................................................................................................ 20 11. Marital status ................................................................................................................