DOCSLIB.ORG

Broadcast Television Standard Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking– GN Docket No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Broadcast Television Standard Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking– GN Docket No October 26, 2017 FCC FACT SHEET* Authorizing Permissive Use of the ‘Next Generation’ Broadcast Television Standard Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking– GN Docket No. 16-142 Background: Earlier this year, the Commission proposed to let television broadcasters use the “Next Generation” broadcast television transmission standard (Next Gen TV or ATSC 3.0) on a voluntary, market- driven basis. Next Gen TV is the new transmission standard developed by the Advanced Television Systems Committee as the world’s first Internet Protocol-based broadcast transmission platform. What the Report and Order Would Do: • Allow television broadcasters to use Next Gen TV on a voluntary, market-driven basis. • Require broadcasters that use Next Gen TV to partner with another local station to simulcast their programming in the current digital television (DTV) transmission standard (ATSC 1.0), so that viewers will continue to receive their existing broadcast service. • For five years, require the programming aired on the ATSC 1.0 simulcast channel to be “substantially similar” to the programming aired on the ATSC 3.0 channel. This means that the programming must be the same, except for programming features that are based on the enhanced capabilities of ATSC 3.0, advertisements, and promotions for upcoming programs. • Exempt low power TV and TV translator stations from the simulcasting requirement, and permit case-by-case waivers if a station has no viable simulcast partner. • Retain mandatory carriage rights on cable and satellite systems for simulcast DTV signals, and afford Next Gen TV signals no mandatory carriage rights while the Commission requires local simulcasting. • Subject Next Gen TV signals to the public interest obligations that currently apply to television broadcasters. • Require broadcasters to provide advance on-air notifications to educate consumers about Next Gen TV service deployment and simulcasting. • Incorporate specific parts of the Next Gen TV technical standard (A/321 and A/322) into our rules and explain the methodology used to calculate interference. The A/322 requirement would apply only to a broadcaster’s primary video stream and would sunset five years from the effective date of the rules unless extended by the Commission. • Conclude that it is unnecessary to adopt a Next Gen TV tuner mandate for new television receivers. What the Further Notice Would Do: • Seek comment on issues related to exceptions and waivers of the requirement that Next Gen TV broadcasters partner with a local station to simulcast DTV signals. • Seek comment on whether to let full power broadcasters use vacant channels in the television broadcast band to encourage use of Next Gen TV. • Tentatively conclude that local simulcasting should not change the “significantly viewed” status of a Next Gen TV station for purposes of cable and satellite carriage. * This document is being released as part of a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding. Any presentations or views on the subject expressed to the Commission or its staff, including by email, must be filed in Docket No. 16-142, which may be accessed via the Electronic Comment Filing System (https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/). Before filing, participants should familiarize themselves with the Commission’s ex parte rules, including the general prohibition on presentations (written and oral) on matters listed on the Sunshine Agenda, which is typically released a week prior to the Commission’s meeting. See 47 CFR § 1.1200 et seq. Federal Communications Commission FCC-CIRC1711-08 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: ) ) Authorizing Permissive Use of the “Next ) GN Docket No. 16-142 Generation” Broadcast Television Standard ) ) REPORT AND ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING* Adopted: [] Released: [] Comment Date: [60 days after date of publication in the Federal Register] Reply Comment Date: [90 days after date of publication in the Federal Register] By the Commission: TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................... 4 III. AUTHORIZING VOLUNTARY DEPLOYMENT OF ATSC 3.0 ....................................................... 6 A. Authorization of Voluntary Use of ATSC 3.0 Transmissions and Treatment under the Act .......... 6 B. Local Simulcasting......................................................................................................................... 11 1. Local Simulcasting Requirement ............................................................................................ 12 2. Definition of Local Simulcasting ............................................................................................ 22 a. Programming on the 1.0 and 3.0 channels ........................................................................ 22 b. Coverage requirements for the ATSC 1.0 simulcast signal .............................................. 29 c. Coverage requirements for ATSC 3.0 signal .................................................................... 39 d. Simulcast exception for LPTV and TV translator stations ............................................... 40 e. Waiver of the simulcasting and coverage requirements ................................................... 46 3. Licensing Issues ...................................................................................................................... 48 a. Licensed simulcast approach ............................................................................................ 48 b. Licensing procedure .......................................................................................................... 53 C. Temporary Use of Vacant Channels .............................................................................................. 60 * This document has been circulated for tentative consideration by the Commission at its November 2017 open meeting. The issues referenced in this document and the Commission’s ultimate resolutions of those issues remain under consideration and subject to change. This document does not constitute any official action by the Commission. However, the Chairman has determined that, in the interest of promoting the public’s ability to understand the nature and scope of issues under consideration, the public interest would be served by making this document publicly available. The Commission’s ex parte rules apply and presentations are subject to “permit-but- disclose” ex parte rules. See, e.g., 47 CFR §§ 1.1206, 1.1200(a). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission’s ex parte rules, including the general prohibition on presentations (written and oral) on matters listed on the Sunshine Agenda, which is typically released a week prior to the Commission’s meeting. See 47 CFR §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission FCC-CIRC1711-08 D. MVPD Carriage ............................................................................................................................. 61 1. Mandatory Carriage of Next Gen TV Stations ........................................................................ 62 a. Only 1.0 Channel Has Mandatory Carriage Rights .......................................................... 63 b. Rights of Relocated 1.0 Simulcast Channel ...................................................................... 70 c. Notice to MVPDs About Relocation of 1.0 Simulcast Channel ....................................... 75 2. Retransmission Consent Issues ............................................................................................... 77 E. FCC Public Interest Obligations and Other FCC Rules ................................................................. 79 1. Applicability of Public Interest Obligations and Other Broadcast Rules to Next Gen TV ............................................................................................................................................ 80 2. Next Gen TV Tuner Mandate .................................................................................................. 83 3. On-Air Notice to Consumers About Deployment of ATSC 3.0 Service and ATSC 1.0 Simulcasting ............................................................................................................................ 86 4. Ancillary and Supplementary Services ................................................................................... 91 5. Interplay with Post-Incentive Auction Transition / Repack .................................................... 93 F. Technical Issues ............................................................................................................................. 94 1. Incorporation by Reference of Technical Standards ............................................................... 95 2. Service and Interference Protection ....................................................................................... 105 a. Interference Protection of ATSC 1.0 (DTV) Signals ...................................................... 106 b. Service and Interference Protection of ATSC 3.0 Signals .............................................. 107 (i) Preservation of Service ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mediakind RX8200
    MediaKind RX8200 The RX8200 offers the ultimate in compression efficiency. RX8200 now provides HEVC decode capability. And for satellite operators RX8200 offers up to 20% bandwidth efficiency gains through full support of the new DVB-S2X international open standard. Combined, these two new technologies offer a step-change in transmission efficiency enabling Operators to dramatically reduce operational costs or free-up bandwidth to launch new revenue generating services. The latest BISS CA security standard is an optional The RX8200 Advanced Modular Receiver is the world’s capability which enables simplistic but unsurpassed bestselling IRD. Now with DVB-S2X and HEVC encryption technology for live events. upgradeability it is also the most future-proof. Broadcasters need to deploy receivers for many different tasks in many different operational circumstances. MediaKind’s RX8200 receiver offers ultimate operational flexibility by providing capability for decoding of all video formats, all video compression formats and total connectivity for all transmission mediums via a comprehensive choice of options. 1 MediaKind RX8200 | 06-2021 v4 mediakind.com Product Overview Base Unit Features Ultimate Efficiency Chassis: (RX8200/BAS/C) The RX8200 Advanced Modular Receiver offers ultimate Base Value Pack: (RX8200/SWO/VP/BASE) bandwidth efficiency for satellite transmissions by incorporating the option for the new DVB-S2 Extensions • Easy to use Dashboard web interface (DVB-S2X) standard. DVB-S2X offers up to 20% bit rate efficiency for typical video applications. • 1x ASI input transport stream input • Frame Sync input Multi-format Decoding - Including HEVC • BISS, BISS 2, Common Interface & MediaKind Director As a true multi-format decoder, the RX8200 can offer descrambling MPEG-4 AVC 4:2:0 and 4:2:2 High Definition decoding in all industry-standard compression formats, including • MediaKind RAS descrambling HEVC.
    [Show full text]
  • KSL-TV--First in the US with Teletext
    DOCUMENT RESUME , ED 229 808 CS 504 188 AUTHOR Acker, Stephen R.; Larson, TimothyL. TITLE KSL-TV--First in fir U.S. with Te1etext. , PUB DATE Nov 82 , NOTE 19p.; Paper presented at the AnnualMeeting/ . of the . Speech Communication Association (68th,'Louipille, A KY, November 4=7, t9821t. PUB TYPE Rep9rts - Evaluative/Feasibility (142) Speeches/Conference Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTOkS *Information Services; *Telephone Coimiunications/ Systems; *Television; Video Equipme; ;,*Videotex IDENTIFIERS *Station Kgr.. TV UT; *Two Way Televi ion ABSTRACT Under an experimental license issu din 1978, KSL-TV in Salt Lake City, Utah, provided 126pages of tel text information to its viewers. In choosing thissystem, the stati n had to decide between it and a videotext system. Althoughvideotext systems permit two-way communication, usuallyover telephone UT, teletext broadcast technology is much cheaper.The Cost fo a decoder, a critical factor in the consumer's'accoptance of e ther system, is ,expected to decline for both technologies.In tel text, access cost is zero, while in videotext theinformation provi er has the option of charging users. It'is possiblethat videotext' interactive capability and superior graphics willincrease rt penetration into paying households. Although teletextand videotext provide similar mass market services, videotext has substantiallymore flexibility and speed. Since systems currently beingused in different countries are incompatible, establishing,technical standards inthe areas of data format, transmission,a d display is of key importance. Current trends and the growing home co1iptermarket favor the growth of videotext, but KSL-TV's experiment howed the value of teletextas an interim information system.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the DVB Project
    History of the DVB Project (This article was written by David Wood around 2013.) Introduction The DVB Project is an Alliance of about 200 companies, originally of European origin but now worldwide. Its objective is to agree specifications for digital media delivery systems, including broadcasting. It is an open, private sector initiative with an annual membership fee, governed by a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). Until late 1990, digital television broadcasting to the home was thought to be impractical and costly to implement. During 1991, broadcasters and consumer equipment manufacturers discussed how to form a concerted pan-European platform to develop digital terrestrial TV. Towards the end of that year, broadcasters, consumer electronics manufacturers and regulatory bodies came together to discuss the formation of a group that would oversee the development of digital television in Europe. This so-called European Launching Group (ELG) expanded to include the major European media interest groups, both public and private, the consumer electronics manufacturers, common carriers and regulators. It drafted the MoU establishing the rules by which this new and challenging game of collective action would be played. The concept of the MoU was a departure into unexplored territory and meant that commercial competitors needed to appreciate their common requirements and agendas. Trust and mutual respect had to be established. The MoU was signed by all ELG participants in September 1993, and the Launching Group renamed itself as the Digital Video Broadcasting Project (DVB). Development work in digital television, already underway in Europe, moved into top gear. Around this time a separate group, the Working Group on Digital Television, prepared a study of the prospects and possibilities for digital terrestrial television in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science of Television. Television and Its Importance for the History of Health and Medicine Jessica Borge, Tricia Close-Koenig, Sandra Schnädelbach
    Introduction: The Science of Television. Television and its Importance for the History of Health and Medicine Jessica Borge, Tricia Close-Koenig, Sandra Schnädelbach To cite this version: Jessica Borge, Tricia Close-Koenig, Sandra Schnädelbach. Introduction: The Science of Television. Television and its Importance for the History of Health and Medicine. Gesnerus, Schwabe Verlag Basel, 2019, 76 (2), pp.153-171. 10.24894/Gesn-en.2019.76008. hal-02885722 HAL Id: hal-02885722 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02885722 Submitted on 30 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Gesnerus 76/2 (2019) 153–171, DOI: 10.24894/Gesn-en.2019.76008 Introduction. The Science of Television: Television and its Importance for the History of Health and Medicine Jessica Borge, Tricia Close-Koenig, Sandra Schnädelbach* From the live transmission of daunting surgical operations and accounts of scandals about medicines in the 1950s and 1960s to participatory aerobic workouts and militant AIDS documentaries in the 1980s the interrelation- ship of the history of bodies and health on television and the history of tele- vision can be witnessed. A telling example of this is the US born aerobics movement as it was brought to TV in Europe, with shows such as Gym Tonic (from 1982) in France, Enorm in Form (from 1983) in Germany or the Green Goddess on BBC Breakfast Time (from 1983) in Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Upfront Thoughts on Broadcast TV, Promotions, Nielsen, and AVOD by Steve Sternberg
    April 2021 #105 ________________________________________________________________________________________ _______ Pre-Upfront Thoughts on Broadcast TV, Promotions, Nielsen, and AVOD By Steve Sternberg Last year’s upfront season was different from any I’ve been involved in during my 40 years in the business. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were no live network presentations to the industry, and for the first time since I’ve been evaluating television programming, I did not watch any of the fall pilots before the shows aired. Many new and returning series experienced production delays, resulting in staggered premieres, shortened seasons, and unexpected cancellations. The big San Diego and New York comic-cons were canceled. There was virtually no pre-season buzz for new broadcast or cable series. Stuck at home with fewer new episodes of scripted series than ever to watch on ad-supported TV, people turned to streaming services in large numbers. Netflix, which had plenty of shows in the pipeline, surged in terms of both viewers and new subscribers. Disney+, boosted by season 2 of The Mandalorian and new Marvel series, WandaVision and Falcon and the Winter Soldier, was able to experience tremendous growth. A Sternberg Report Sponsored Message The Sternberg Report ©2021 ________________________________________________________________________________________ _______ Amazon Prime Video, and Hulu also managed to substantially grow their subscriber bases. Warner Bros. announcing it would release all of its movies in 2021 simultaneously in theaters and on HBO Max (led by Wonder Woman 1984 and Godzilla vs. Kong), helped add subscribers to that streaming platform as well – as did its successful original series, The Flight Attendant. CBS All Access, rebranded as Paramount+, also enjoyed growth.
    [Show full text]
  • BETS-5 Issue 1 November 1, 1996
    BETS-5 Issue 1 November 1, 1996 Spectrum Management Broadcasting Equipment Technical Standard Technical Standards and Requirements for AM Broadcasting Transmitters Aussi disponible en français - NTMR-5 Purpose This document contains the technical standards and requirements for the issuance of a Technical Acceptance Certificate (TAC) for AM broadcasting transmitters. A certificate issued for equipment classified as type approved or as technically acceptable before the coming into force of these technical standards and requirements is considered to be a valid and subsisting TAC. A Technical Acceptance Certificate is not required for equipment manufactured or imported solely for re-export, prototyping, demonstration, exhibition or testing purposes. i Table of Contents Page 1. General ...............................................................1 2. Testing and Labelling ..................................................1 3. Standard Test Conditions ..............................................2 4. Transmitting Equipment Standards .....................................3 5. Equipment Requirements ..............................................4 6. RF Carrier Performance Standards .................................... 5 6.1 Power Output Rating .................................................5 6.2 Modulation Capability ................................................5 6.3 Carrier Frequency Stability ............................................6 6.4 Carrier Level Shift ...................................................7 6.5 Spurious Emissions
    [Show full text]
  • DTMB, ATSC, ISDB-T, DVB T/T2) and Radio & Emergency Warning Broadcasting System
    Session 3 Broadcasting Standards for digital television (DTMB, ATSC, ISDB-T, DVB T/T2) and radio & Emergency Warning Broadcasting System 2015 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Dr AMAL Punchihewa Director ABU Technology Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union A Vice Chair of World Broadcasting Union Technical Committee (WBU-TC) Dr Amal Punchihewa © Director of Technology ABU & A Vice Chair of World Broadcasting Union Technical Committee (WBU-TC) DTMB, ATSC, DVB and ABU working on EWS 2.0 , looking at Asia-Pacific requirements and building a reference model Dr Amal Punchihewa PhD, MEEng, BSC(Eng)Hons, CEng, FIET, FIPENZ, SMIEEE, MSLAAS, MCS Postgraduate Studies in Business Administration Director ABU Technology Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia A Vice-Chair World Broadcasting Unions Technical Committee (WBU-TC) Dr Amal Punchihewa © Director of Technology ABU & A Vice Chair of World Broadcasting Union Technical Committee (WBU-TC) 2 Outline • Digital Broadcasting • Television Services – Free TV or Pay TV – OTA or Cable • DTV Standards • What are EWS – Content delivered from distance, Live, VOD, …. Dr Amal Punchihewa © Director of Technology ABU & A Vice Chair of World Broadcasting Union Technical Committee (WBU-TC) 3 Traditional TV Traditional Broadcasting • Linear TV – At scheduled times, missed it then catch the delayed version, … • Public or commercial – Funding or business model, FTA, adverting, License fee, subscription, … • Terrestrial, Satellite, Cable – Now cloud, IP etc. … • Return channel – One-to-many service, no return channel
    [Show full text]
  • From Broadcast to Broadband: the Effects of Legal Digital Distribution
    From Broadcast to Broadband: The Effects of Legal Digital Distribution on a TV Show’s Viewership by Steven D. Rosenberg An honors thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science Undergraduate College Leonard N. Stern School of Business New York University May 2007 Professor Marti G. Subrahmanyam Professor Jarl G. Kallberg Faculty Adviser Thesis Advisor 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 2. Legal Digital Distribution............................................................................................. 6 2.1 iTunes ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Streaming ................................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Current thoughts ...................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Financial importance ............................................................................................. 12 3. Data Collection ............................................................................................................ 13 3.1 Ratings data ............................................................................................................ 13 3.2 Repeat data ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Television and the Allure of Auctions: the Birth and Stillbirth of DTV Legislation
    Federal Communications Law Journal Volume 49 Issue 3 Article 2 4-1997 Digital Television and the Allure of Auctions: The Birth and Stillbirth of DTV Legislation Ellen P. Goodman Covington & Burling Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj Part of the Communications Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Goodman, Ellen P. (1997) "Digital Television and the Allure of Auctions: The Birth and Stillbirth of DTV Legislation," Federal Communications Law Journal: Vol. 49 : Iss. 3 , Article 2. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj/vol49/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Federal Communications Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Digital Television and the Allure of Auctions: The Birth and Stillbirth of DTV Legislation Ellen P. Goodman* I. INTRODUCTION ................................... 517 II. ORIGINS OF THE DTV PRovIsIoNs OF THE 1996 ACT .... 519 A. The Regulatory Process ..................... 519 B. The FirstBills ............................ 525 1. The Commerce Committee Bills ............. 526 2. Budget Actions ......................... 533 C. The Passage of the 1996Act .................. 537 Ill. THE AFTERMATH OF THE 1996 ACT ................ 538 A. Setting the Stage .......................... 538 B. The CongressionalHearings .................. 542 IV. CONCLUSION ................................ 546 I. INTRODUCTION President Clinton signed into law the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996 Act or the Act) on February 8, 1996.1 The pen he used to sign the Act was also used by President Eisenhower to create the federal highway system in 1957 and was later given to Senator Albert Gore, Sr., the father of the highway legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Ownership Rules
    05-Sadler.qxd 2/3/2005 12:47 PM Page 101 5 MEDIA OWNERSHIP RULES It is the purpose of this Act, among other things, to maintain control of the United States over all the channels of interstate and foreign radio transmission, and to provide for the use of such channels, but not the ownership thereof, by persons for limited periods of time, under licenses granted by Federal author- ity, and no such license shall be construed to create any right, beyond the terms, conditions, and periods of the license. —Section 301, Communications Act of 1934 he Communications Act of 1934 reestablished the point that the public airwaves were “scarce.” They were considered a limited and precious resource and T therefore would be subject to government rules and regulations. As the Supreme Court would state in 1943,“The radio spectrum simply is not large enough to accommodate everybody. There is a fixed natural limitation upon the number of stations that can operate without interfering with one another.”1 In reality, the airwaves are infinite, but the govern- ment has made a limited number of positions available for use. In the 1930s, the broadcast industry grew steadily, and the FCC had to grapple with the issue of broadcast station ownership. The FCC felt that a diversity of viewpoints on the airwaves served the public interest and was best achieved through diversity in station ownership. Therefore, to prevent individuals or companies from controlling too many broadcast stations in one area or across the country, the FCC eventually instituted ownership rules. These rules limit how many broadcast stations a person can own in a single market or nationwide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market Leader in Over-The-Air Broadcasting Solutions
    Connecting What’s Next The Market Leader in Over-the-Air Broadcasting Solutions GatesAir efficiently leverages broadcast spectrum to maximize performance for multichannel TV and radio services, offering the industry’s broadest portfolio to help broadcasters wirelessly deliver and monetize content. With nearly 100 years in broadcasting, GatesAir’s exclusive focus on the over-the-air market helps broadcasters optimize services today and prepare for future revenue-generating business opportunities. All research, development and innovation is driven from the company’s facilities in Mason, Ohio and supported by the long-standing manufacturing center in Quincy, Illinois. GatesAir’s turnkey solutions are built on three pillars: Content Transport, TV Transmission, and Radio Transmission. GatesAir’s globally renowned Intraplex range comprises the Transport pillar, enabling audio contribution and distribution (along with data) over IP and TDM networks. Intraplex solutions provide value for broadcasters for point-to-point (STL, remote broadcast) and multipoint (single-frequency networks, syndicated distribution) connectivity. GatesAir continues to innovate robust and reliable solutions for traditional RF STL connections that can also accommodate IP traffic. In larger transmitter networks, Simulcasting technology ensures all GatesAir transmitters are time-locked for synchronous, over-the-air content delivery. Powering over-the-air analog and digital radio/TV stations and networks worldwide with the industry’s most operationally efficient transmitters is a longtime measure of success for GatesAir. Groundbreaking innovations in low, medium and high- power transmitters reduce footprint, energy use and more to establish the industry’s lowest total cost of ownership. Support for all digital standards and convergence with mobile networks ensure futureproof systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Channels Near to CNBC Increases Viewership By
    REDACTED FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION channels near to CNBC increases viewership by [[_]]9 When neighborhooded with CNBC, the hours BTV is watched per week increases [[_JJ, relative to average hours watched. 10 In fact, when BTV was simulcast in the morning by the USA Network from 2001-2003, which was prior to NBC's acquisition of USA Network, at which time carriage of BTV was dropped, BTV occasionally outdrew CNBC during the critical early morning "prime time" hours. II Similarly, BTV has significantly higher viewership when it is carried on cable systems in non-U.S. markets where its channel is neighborhooded with CNBC and similar news programming. [[ support its wide international viewership, Bloomberg TV broadcasts through Bloomberg Asia, Bloomberg Europe, and Bloomberg USA. I3 News bureaus in London, Hong Kong, and Beijing - to name only a few - broadcast internationally at varying times throughout the day. These international programs enjoy widespread success. Bloomberg has received numerous awards for BTV. 14 9 See Exhibit 3, Dr. Leslie M. Marx, Professor of Economics, Duke University and former Chief Economist, Federal Communications Commission, Economic Report on the Proposed Comcast­ NBC Universal Transaction at Appendix at 23 ("Marx Report"). to Marx Report Appendix at 23. II USA Weekly Report Spreadsheet. 12 [[ JJ 13 Bloomberg Television, http://www.bloomberg.com/medialtv/ (last visited June 4,2010). 14 Bloomberg Television, About Bloomberg, News Awards, http://about.bloomberg.com/news_awards.html (last visited June 4, 2010). 7 5103307.02 REDACffiD FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION II. BLOOMBERG HAS STANDING TO PETITION TO DENY THE APPLICATION Bloomberg has standing to petition the Commission to deny the Application in the 15 Comcast-NBCU merger as a party in interest in that it has both "competitor" standing16 and "listener" standing.
    [Show full text]