DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian Military Almanac

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russian Military Almanac RussiAn Military AlmanAc Organization of the Russian Armed Forces In January 1997, President Boris Yeltsin signed an order making official a new he- raldic emblem for the armed forces. The double-headed eagle has wings spread to indicate readiness to take flight, attack, and defend. At the heart of the emblem lay a shield depicting St. George and the Dragon, the symbol of the city of Moscow. everal military structures, each the Federal Communications Agency, junior officers. Women helped compensate S subordinate to Russia’s President, the Federal Railroad Troops Service, the for the shortage of qualified male con- composed the nation’s armed forces in Construction Troops, and the Federal scripts. 1996 and through the first half of 1997. Special Construction Directorate. Neither President Boris Yeltsin and other politi- At the top level, direction was provided the Russian Minister of Defense nor the cal leaders emphasized the importance of by two organizations, each chaired by the Chief of the General Staff had any control Russia’s nuclear forces. Deputy Security President and directed by politically power- over these other power structures, whose Council Secretary Boris Berezovskiy assert ful civilian secretaries. The first was the numbers were estimated to be between -ed that Russia’s new National Security Security Council, responsible for formulat- 800,000 and two million. All of these troops, Con-cept provided for first use of such ing the National Security Concept. This however, were subject to the Military Regu- weapons in a crisis. Priority was given to document defines Russia’s priority national lations of the Armed Forces of the Russian maintaining these weapons and to R&D for interests and reportedly was completed in Federation. future weapons systems, with emphasis May 1997 but not published. Second was The Ministry of Defense (MoD) adminis- on space. Work appeared to continue on a the Defense Council, created in July 1996 tered eight regular military districts inside massive, deep underground battle station and charged with producing a new military Russia. In addition, there were seven in the Ural Mountains. doctrine and guiding military reform. This districts of Internal Troops, six districts of was scheduled to have been ready in June Border Guards, and seven regional centers Armed Forces under the Defense Minis- 1997 but was delayed indefinitely. Threats of Civil Defense Troops. Each agency try. These forces had the primary responsi- to Russia’s security, as well as the role, supported large local staffs with general bility for defending Russia against external structure, and composition of its armed officers in abundance. There was much threats. They are divided into five services, forces, are to be determined by the provi- overlapping and duplication in their work as in Soviet days. Moreover, there were two sions of these two documents. but little coordination. smaller forces: Military Space Forces and Heads of the five most influential Rus- Non–MoD organizations, in particular Airborne Forces, referred to as “reserves of sian uniformed organizations sat on both Border Guards and Internal Troops, were the Supreme Command.” the Security and Defense councils. These not paramilitary forces in any sense. Leading political and military leaders were the Minister of Defense, the Direc- With the treaty-driven downsizing of MoD em -phasized that MoD forces will be re- tor of the Federal Security Service, the troops in the early 1990s, many units organized. Newly appointed Minister of De- Minister of Internal Affairs, the Director of were simply transferred to one of the fense, Gen. of the Army Igor D. Ser geyev, the Foreign Intelligence Service, and the other “power ministries.” As the fighting in de-clared that Russia would establish four Director of the Federal Border Guards. The Chechnya showed, non–MoD troops often rapid-response mobile forces, each with its Minister for Civil Defense and Emergency were better armed and trained than MoD own air and naval support, if needed. They Situations, the Head of the Federal Security forces. would be located in the Far East, North Guard Service, and the Minister for Nuclear Russia’s conventional military capability Caucasus area, and Moscow Military Dis- Energy (who heads troops) were members continued to decline. Troop training was at trict (with two). The size of these planned of only the Security Council. a minimum. “Untouchable” reserves of both forces, which were primarily in tended to Less prominent power centers, com- food and equipment, intended for wartime deal with regional conflicts, was not given. manded by generals and filled with troops, emergency, were utilized. Soldiers often also reported to the President. These were undernourished; medical support was Defense Ministry. This once highly profes- included the Presidential Security Service, primitive. There was a serious shortage of sional body became politicized and rife with 56 AIR FORCE Magazine / October 1997 RussiAn Military AlmanAc By Tamar A. Mehuron, Associate Editor, with Harriet Fast Scott, William F. Scott, and David Markov dissent and corruption. Minister of Defense missile-space defense troops, surface- submarines have met the same fate. Rus- Gen. of the Army Pavel Grachev, who to-air missile troops, air defense aviation sia’s newer submarines were a different came to President Yeltsin’s aid in the coup troops, and radiotechnical (radar) troops. story. A new fourth-generation ballistic attempts of 1991 and 1993, was dismissed President Yeltsin continued to press for a missile submarine, referred to as the Borey in June 1996. His successor, Gen. of the “Unified Air Defense System” for the com- project, has been approved by presiden- Army Igor Rodionov, on reaching com- monwealth and directed the Ministries of tial decree and work started on the lead pulsory retirement age of 60 the following Defense and Foreign Affairs to develop and unit in November 1996. The first Borey is December, retired and became Russia’s implement it. The “Agreement on the Cre- scheduled to be launched in 2002, with first civilian Defense Minister. However, ation of a CIS Unified Air Defense System,” an additional unit each year thereafter. Rodionov was never accepted in the Presi- signed in 1995, had not been implemented. The Borey is expected to carry 12 new dent’s inner circle and disagreed with the Only air defense troops of Kazakhstan, ballistic missiles. If the START II agreement reform policies of Yuriy Baturin, Defense Russia, and Belarus performed alert duty. is ratified, 55 percent of Russia’s remain- Council Secretary. Azerbaijan had not subscribed to the ing nuclear warheads would be based on In May 1997, during a televised meeting of Agreement; Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, SSBNs by 2003. the Defense Council, both Minister of De- and Ukraine cooperated with Russia fense Rodionov and the Chief of the Gener- only on a bilateral basis. Moscow’s ABM Ground Forces (SV) appeared as the most al Staff, Gen. of the Army Viktor Samsonov, system, intended “to combat unauthorized, neglected of the five Ministry of Defense were dismissed. Gen. of the Army Igor provocative, or terrorist strikes by various services. Approximately 90,000 of the Sergeyev, CINC of the Strategic Rocket categories of combat missiles,” continued Ground Forces’ personnel were contract Forces, was designated the new Defense to receive attention. volunteers. These troops, as well as the Minister. Gen. Col. Anatoliy Kvashnin, initial regular conscripts, were of poor quality with Commander of the Joint Group of Federal Air Forces (VVS) remained divided into little education. Training was minimal. Within Troops fighting in Chechnya, moved from long-range (strategic), frontal (tactical), the republics of the former Soviet Union, the Commander of the North Caucasus Military and transport aviation. Gen. Col. Peter S. Trans caucasus Group of Forces had troops District to Chief of the General Staff. Dr. Deynekin, CINC Air Forces, admitted that, deployed in both Georgia and Armenia. In Andrey A. Kokoshin retained his position of the Air Forces’ tactical aircraft—intercep- May 1996, a special military contingent was as First Deputy Minister of Defense guiding tors, ground attack, and medium-range formed to direct and support the 17 motor- military-technical and economic policy. theater bomber types—only 30 percent ized and four airborne battal-ions involved consisted of fourth generation MiG-29s and in peacekeeping. A motorized rifle peace- Strategic Rocket Forces (RVSN) contin- Su-27s. He said that the Air Forces “did not keeping division was in Moldova and an- ued to have first priority in personnel and purchase a single new military aircraft in other similar division in Tajikistan. A military equipment. This service consisted of four 1996.” Deynekin described the shortage of unit remains in Southern Ossetia (Georgia). missile armies, which contained 19 divi- parts, engines, accumulators, and rubber Some units were part of CIS Col-lective sions. The Topol-M missile, an advanced as disastrous and said that only some 50 Peacemaking Forces based in Abkhazia version of the silo-based and mobile Topol percent of the airplanes were operational. and Tajikistan. Russian units also serve ICBM, was introduced into service. RVSN Lack of flying time for pilots remained a as part of UN peacekeeping operations. conducted five practice missile launches in major problem. Military air transport pilots A special branch of service, the Airborne 1996. The last was a RS-22 rocket launch were able to maintain a level of proficiency Forces, were under the direct control of the from a combat railway car launching pad. by flying paid air cargoes and by support- President but administered by the Ground The primary central command point of ing Russian peacekeeping operations. In Forces. There was much confusion about RVSN was located underground next to tactical units fuel shortages limited pilots to their subordination and size. In September the headquarters building in Vlasikha 30–50 hours a year of flight time, compared 1996 the MoD ruled that they would be re- near Moscow.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Babadzhanian, Hamazasp
    Babadzhanian, Hamazasp Born: February 18th, 1906 Died: November 1st, 1977 (Aged 71) Ethnicity: Armenian Field of Activity: Red Army Brief Biography Hamazasp Khachaturi Babadzhanian was a Russian military general who served during multiple wars for the Soviet Union, rising to prominence during the Great Patriotic War. He was born in 1906 into an impecunious Armenian family in Chardakhlu, Azerbaijan. He attended a secondary school in Tiflis in 1915 but due to familial financial difficulties was forced to return home and toil in the fields on his family’s plot of land, later working as a highway worker during 1923-24. Babadzhanian joined the Red Army in 1925 and later attended a Military School in Yerevan in 1926, graduating as an officer in 1929, as well as joining the Soviet Communist Party in 1928. He received various postings, mopping up armed gangs in the Caucasus region in 1930 and aided in liquidating the Kulak revolt. Babadzhanian moved around frequently, generally within the Transcaucasus and Baku regions, until 1939-1940, when he served in the Finno-Soviet war. He played a pivotal role in numerous battles in World War 2, participating in the battle of Smolensk, as well as contributing a fundamentally in Yelnya, where he overcame a far superior German force. For his efforts in recapturing Stanslav he received the title of Hero of the Soviet Union. He provided support in Poland, as well fighting in Berlin, contributing to the capture of the Reichstag. After the Great Patriotic War Babadzhanian would prove crucial in quelling the Hungarian Revolution in 1956, and some time after in 1975 became Chief Marshal of the Tank and Armoured Troops, a rank only he and one other attained.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerasimov Doctrine’: Why the West Fails to Beat Russia to the Punch
    King’s Research Portal Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Fridman, O. (2019). On ‘Gerasimov Doctrine’: Why the West Fails to Beat Russia to the Punch. Prism, 8(2), 101- 112. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Conventional Armed Forces: on the Verge of Collapse?
    Order Code 97-820 F CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Russian Conventional Armed Forces: On the Verge of Collapse? September 4, 1997 (name redacted) Specialist in Russian Affairs Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Russian Conventional Armed Forces: On the Verge of Collapse? Summary All quantitative indicators show a sharp, and in most cases an accelerating, decline in the size of the Russian armed forces. Since 1986, Russian military manpower has decreased by over 70 percent; tanks and other armored vehicles by two-thirds; and artillery, combat aircraft, and surface warships by one-third. Weapons procurement has been plummeting for over a decade. In some key categories, such as aircraft, tanks, and surface warships, procurement has virtually stopped. This has led not only to a decline in present inventory, but implies a long-term crisis of bloc obsolescence in the future. Russian Government decisions and the budget deficit crisis have hit the Ministry of Defense very hard, cutting defense spending drastically and transforming the Defense Ministry into a residual claimant on scarce resources. Many experts believe that if these budgetary constraints continue for 2-3 more years, they must lead either to more drastic force reductions or to military collapse. Military capabilities are also in decline. Reportedly, few, if any, of Russia’s army divisions are combat-ready. Field exercises, flight training, and out-of-area naval deployments have been sharply reduced. Morale is low, partly because of non-payment of servicemen’s salaries. Draft evasion and desertion are rising.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing in Federal States
    NEPAL STEPSTONES PROJECTS Policing in Federal States Philipp Fluri and Marlene Urscheler (Eds.) Policing in Federal States Edited by Philipp Fluri and Marlene Urscheler Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) www.dcaf.ch The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces is one of the world’s leading institutions in the areas of security sector reform (SSR) and security sector governance (SSG). DCAF provides in-country advisory support and practical assis- tance programmes, develops and promotes appropriate democratic norms at the international and national levels, advocates good practices and makes policy recommendations to ensure effective democratic governance of the security sector. DCAF’s partners include governments, parliaments, civil society, international organisations and the range of security sector actors such as police, judiciary, intelligence agencies, border security ser- vices and the military. 2011 Policing in Federal States Edited by Philipp Fluri and Marlene Urscheler Geneva, 2011 Philipp Fluri and Marlene Urscheler, eds., Policing in Federal States, Nepal Stepstones Projects Series # 2 (Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2011). Nepal Stepstones Projects Series no. 2 © Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2011 Executive publisher: Procon Ltd., <www.procon.bg> Cover design: Angel Nedelchev ISBN 978-92-9222-149-2 PREFACE In this book we will be looking at specimens of federative police or- ganisations. As can be expected, the federative organisation of such states as Germany, Switzerland, the USA, India and Russia will be reflected in their police organisation, though the extremely decentralised approach of Switzerland with hardly any central man- agement structures can hardly serve as a paradigm of ‘the’ federal police organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Manpower Problems of the Russian Armed Forces
    Conflict Studies Research Centre D62 Manpower Problems of The Russian Armed Forces M J Orr Introduction On 15 January Lt Gen Vasiliy Smirnov, deputy head of the main organization- mobilization directorate of the Russian general staff, announced the preliminary results of the autumn 2001 conscription period. "The plan of the autumn call-up as laid down in the Russian Federation's President's decree No. 148 has been carried out. Between October and December 2001 more than 194,000 Russian citizens, aged from 18 to 27, were sent to the army and fleet … (T)he quality of the conscript contingent is getting worse. Out of every 100 potential conscripts last year the military commissariats were only able to draft 12 young men; the remainder had legal reasons for being excused military service. Today in Russia every third potential conscript proves unfit for service on health grounds … more than 50% of the conscripts sent to the forces have health limitations on their fitness for service."1 Such statements emerge from the organization-mobilization department twice a year, as a sort of ritual bringing the conscription campaign to a close. Each time the decreed quantity of recruits has been found and each time their quality has declined. Within these standardized announcements there is no suggestion that the whole system for recruiting the Russian armed forces is steadily collapsing. Last autumn, however, there were indications that, at long last, the Russian government has accepted that the system must be changed. Programmes to phase out conscription are being considered although it is not clear that the general staff has accepted that a professional army is desirable or practical.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia the Ingush-Ossetian Conflict in the Prigorodnyi Region
    Russia Page 1 of 32 RUSSIA THE INGUSH-OSSETIAN CONFLICT IN THE PRIGORODNYI REGION Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch New York · Washington · London · Brussels Copyright © May 1996 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalogue Number: 96-75960 ISBN: 1-56432-165-7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is based on a trip to the Republic of Ingushetiya, hereafter Ingushetiya, and the Republic of North Ossetia- Alaniya, hereafter North Ossetia, both states of the Russian Federation, from August 11-19, 1994. Until 1994, North Ossetia was the North Ossetian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR), a part of the former Soviet Union. Until 1992, Ingushetiya was part of the Checheno-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR), and was also part of the former Soviet Union. Human Rights/Helsinki representatives visited Vladikavkaz, Kartsa, Chermen, Tarskoye, Kurtat, Dachnoye, and Maiskii in North Ossetia and Nazran and Gaziyurt in Ingushetiya. Jeri Laber and Rachel Denber edited the report, and Shira Robinson provided production assistance for its publication. Human Rights Watch/Helsinki thanks both North Ossetian and Ingush authorities as well as officials from the Russian Temporary Administration (now the Temporary State Committee) for their cooperation with the mission participants. Human Rights Watch/Helsinki would like to express our appreciation to all those who read the report and commented on it, including Prof. John Collarusso of McMaster University. We would also like to thank the members of the Russian human rights group Memorial, who provided generous assistance and advice. In 1994 Memorial published an excellent report on the conflict in the Prigorodnyi region, "Two Years after the War: The Problem of the Forcibly Displaced in the Area of the Ossetian-Ingush Conflict." Finally, we would like to thank the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Henry Jackson Fund, the Merck Fund and the Moriah Fund for their support.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LAND WARFARE PAPERS Perestroika and Soviet Military
    THE LAND WARFARE PAPERS No.5 OCTOBER 1990 Perestroika and Soviet Military Personnel By Robert B. Davis A National Security Affairs Paper Published on Occasion by THE INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY Arlington, Virginia PERESTROIKA AND SOVIET MILITARY PERSONNEL by Robert B. Davis THE INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY AN AUSA INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE PAPER In 1988 the Association of the United States Army (AUSA) established within its existing organization a new entity known as the Institute of Land Warfare. Its purpose is to extend the educational work of AUSA by sponsoring scholarly publications, to include books, monographs and essays on key defense issues, as well as workshops and symposia. A work selected for publication as a Land Warfare Paper represents research by the author which, in the opinion of the editorial board, will contribute to a better understanding of a particular defense or national security issue. Publication as an AUSA Institute of Land Warfare Paper does not indicate that the Association of the United States Army agrees with everything in the paper, but does suggest that AUSA believes the paper will stimulate the thinking of AUSA members and others concerned about important defense issues. LAND WARFARE PAPER NO. S, OCTOBER 1990 Perestroika and Soviet Military Personnel by Robert B. Davis Mr. Robert B. Davis is a research psychologist with the U.S. Army Foreign Science and Technology Center in Charlottesville, Virginia. Mr. Davis received his undergraduate degree from Arkansas College and his advanced degree from Troy State University, Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Strategic Mobility
    Russia’s Strategic Mobility: Supporting ’Hard Pow Supporting ’Hard Mobility: Strategic Russia’s Russia’s Strategic Mobility Supporting ’Hard Power’ to 2020? The following report examines the military reform in Russia. The focus is on Russia’s military-strategic mobility and assess- ing how far progress has been made toward genuinely enhanc- ing the speed with which military units can be deployed in a N.McDermott Roger er’ to2020? theatre of operations and the capability to sustain them. In turn this necessitates examination of Russia’s threat environ- ment, the preliminary outcome of the early reform efforts, and consideration of why the Russian political-military leadership is attaching importance to the issue of strategic mobility. Russia’s Strategic Mobility Supporting ’Hard Power’ to 2020? Roger N. McDermott FOI-R--3587--SE ISSN1650-1942 www.foi.se April 2013 Roger N. McDermott Russia’s Strategic Mobility Supporting ‘Hard Power’ to 2020? Title Russia’s Strategic Mobility: Supporting ‘Hard Power’ to 2020? Titel Rysk strategisk mobilitet: Stöd för maktut- övning till 2020? Report no FOI-R--3587--SE Month April Year 2013 Antal sidor/Pages 101 p ISSN 1650-1942 Kund/Customer Försvarsdepartementet/ Ministry of Defence Projektnr/Project no A11301 Godkänd av/Approved by Maria Lignell Jakobsson Ansvarig avdelning/Departement Försvarsanalys/Defence Analysis This work is protected under the Act on Copyright in Literary and Artistic Works (SFS 1960:729). Any form of reproduction, translation or modification without permission is prohibited. Cover photo: Denis Sinyakov, by permission. www.denissinyakov.com FOI-R--3587--SE Summary Since 2008, Russia’s conventional Armed Forces have been subject to a contro- versial reform and modernization process designed to move these structures be- yond the Soviet-legacy forces towards a modernized military.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions for More Information on This Publication, Visit
    C O R P O R A T I O N ALAN J. VICK, SEAN M. ZEIGLER, JULIA BRACKUP, JOHN SPEED MEYERS Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4368 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0500-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The growing cruise and ballistic missile threat to U.S. Air Force bases in Europe has led Headquarters U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratizing Communist Militaries
    Democratizing Communist Militaries Democratizing Communist Militaries The Cases of the Czech and Russian Armed Forces Marybeth Peterson Ulrich Ann Arbor To Mark, Erin, and Benjamin Copyright © by the University of Michigan 1999 All rights reserved Published in the United States of America by The University of Michigan Press Manufactured in the United States of America V∞ Printed on acid-free paper 2002 2001 2000 1999 4 3 2 1 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ulrich, Marybeth Peterson. Democratizing Communist militaries : the cases of the Czech and Russian armed forces / Marybeth Peterson Ulrich. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 0-472-10969-3 (acid-free paper) 1. Civil-military relations—Russia (Federation) 2. Civil-military relations—Former Soviet republics. 3. Civil-military relations—Czech Republic. 4. Russia (Federation)—Armed Forces—Political activity. 5. Former Soviet republics—Armed Forces—Political activity. 6. Czech Republic—Armed Forces—Political activity. 7. Military assistance, American—Russia (Federation) 8. Military assistance, American—Former Soviet republics. 9. Military assistance, American—Czech Republic. I. Title. JN6520.C58 U45 1999 3229.5909437109049—dc21 99-6461 CIP Contents List of Tables vii Acknowledgments ix List of Abbreviations xi Introduction 1 Chapter 1. A Theory of Democratic Civil-Military Relations in Postcommunist States 5 Chapter 2. A Survey of Overall U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1387
    2.10.2020 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 319 I/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1387 of 2 October 2020 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (1), and in particular Article 8a(1) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Whereas: (1) On 18 May 2006, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus. (2) On 9 August 2020, Belarus conducted presidential elections, which were found to be inconsistent with international standards and marred by repression of independent candidates and a brutal crackdown on peaceful protesters in the wake of the elections. On 11 August 2020, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy issued a declaration on behalf of the Union, assessing that the elections were neither free nor fair. It was also stated that measures against those responsible for violence, unjustified arrests and falsification of election results could be taken. (3) In view of the gravity of the situation in Belarus, 40 persons should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Npr 4.2: Tactical Nuclear Weapons Elimination
    Nikolai Sokov TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS ELIMINATION: NEXT STEP FOR ARMS CONTROL by Nikolai Sokov Dr. Nikolai Sokov began his career as a research fellow at the Institute of USA and Canada Studies in Moscow and at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), where he received his candidate of history degree in 1986. In 1987, he joined the Soviet Foreign Ministry and worked on disarmament issues and participated in the START I talks. In 1992, he took a leave of absence and enrolled at the University of Michigan, where he received his Ph.D. in Political Science in 1996. Dr. Sokov is now a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies of the Monterey Institute of International Studies. uclear disarmament is again ons as a desirable first step.2 the Commonwealth of Independent receiving the attention of Tactical nuclear weapons (TNW) States (CIS) at the end of 1991 and Npoliticians and nongovern- are the only part of the nuclear arse- in early 1992 (indirectly codified by mental experts after several years nals of the United States and Russia the Lisbon Protocol to the START I on the back burner. Debates have that is regulated primarily by an in- Treaty) developed this informal re- been stimulated by the December formal regime—one that is not codi- gime further. These agreements pro- 1996 letter from a distinguished group fied in an international treaty. That vided for the withdrawal to Russia of retired U.S. and Russian generals regime was established in 1991 by of TNW from the territories of calling for the complete elimination reciprocal unilateral obligations of Belarus, Ukraine, and Kazakstan.
    [Show full text]