School Transportation Technician Annual Inspection Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

School Transportation Technician Annual Inspection Guide Annual Inspection and Maintenance Resource Guide May 2020 SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION UNIT 201 East Colfax Avenue, Denver, CO 80203 303-866-6655/303-866-6656 http://www.cde.state.co.us/transportation Page 2 of 361 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 5 Vehicle Inspection Program ................................................................................ 7 Annual Inspection Requirements .......................................................................... 9 PM Brake Inspection and Documentation Requirements .............................................. 11 Brake inspector Requirements ............................................................................ 12 Certification ................................................................................................ 13 Introduction to the Hands-On Performance Test ...................................................... 19 Records, Documentation, and Retention............................................................... 39 Forms ......................................................................................................... 43 STU-13 CDE Annual Inspector Test Answer Sheet ..................................................... 43 STU-19 Hands-On Test check list ........................................................................ 43 STU-20 Application for Annual Inspector Qualification or Recertification ........................ 44 STU-22 Application for Inspecting Site Certification ................................................. 44 STU-24 CDE Brake Inspector's Qualification Certificate .............................................. 45 STU-25 Affidavit of Annual Inspection .................................................................. 46 STU-26 CDE Annual Inspection/Preventive Maintenance Checklist ................................. 46 STU-27 Trailer Annual Inspection/Preventive Maintenance Checklist ............................. 46 STU-30 Hands-On Tester Qualification Recertification ............................................... 49 Section A. Road Test inspection ........................................................................ A-2 Chart A-1. Steering Wheel Play (Lash) Measurements Chart ....................................... A-4 Chart A-2. FMVSS.111 Mirror Adjustment ........................................................... A-12 Chart A-3. FORD Warning Lights / Buzzer ........................................................... A-22 Chart A-4. NAVISTAR Brake Failure Warning System Checks ..................................... A-23 Chart A-5. Ford Normal Brake System Conditions.................................................. A-24 Section B. Under Hood Inspection ...................................................................... B-2 Chart B-1. Belt Inspection ..............................................................................B-12 Chart B-2. Pulley Inspection ...........................................................................B-14 Chart B-3. Checking Belt Tension .....................................................................B-16 Section C. Interior Inspection ........................................................................... C-2 Chart C-1. First Aid Kit................................................................................... C-7 Chart C-2. Body Fluid Cleanup Kit ..................................................................... C-8 Section D. Under Vehicle Inspection ................................................................... D-2 Page 3 of 361 Chart D-1. Tightening Steering Column Joint Bolts .................................................. D-3 Chart D-2. Steering Joints ............................................................................. D-12 Section E. Around Vehicle ............................................................................... E-2 Chart E-1. Service Door, Stop Arm, Amber and Red Warning Lights ............................. E-16 Chart E-2. Measuring Push Rod Travel ................................................................ E-19 Chart E-3. Air Brake Adjustment Chart ............................................................... E-21 Chart E-4. Tire Wear ................................................. E-Error! Bookmark not defined. Section T: Trailer Inspection ............................................................................ T-2 Appendix A. Regulation 1 CCR 301-26 (2018) Rules for the Operation, Maintenance, and Inspection of School Transportation Vehicles Effective date Jan 01, 2018 .......... A-1 Appendix B. Regulation 1 CCR 301-25 (2015) Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles Effective date April 30, 2015 .................................B-22 Appendix C. Regulation 1 CCR 301-25 (2007) Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles Effective date September 01, 2007 .................................. C-1 Appendix D. Regulation 1 CCR 301-25 (1998) Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles Effective date February 01, 1999 .................................. D-1 Appendix E. Regulation 1 CCR 301-25 (1993) Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles Effective date October 01, 1993 .................................. E-1 Appendix F. Colorado Racking Load Test.............................................................. F-1 Appendix G. Glossary .................................................................................... G-1 Appendix H. Additional Resources ..................................................................... H-1 Page 4 of 361 Introduction The Colorado Department of Education (CDE) School Transportation Unit has promulgated this resource guide to assist public school districts, charter schools, as well as Boards of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) with developing policies and procedures for the safe transportation of students. These guidelines provide manufacturer recommendations, industry standards and best practices which are consistent with the Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles, 1 CCR 301-25 and the Colorado Rules for the Operation, Maintenance and Inspection of School Transportation Vehicles 1 CCR 301-26. This publication is intended to serve as a transportation provider resource toward compliance with legislation and regulations. Acknowledgements Colorado Department of Education School Transportation Unit Jennifer Okes Chief Operating Officer [email protected] Fred Stewart Transportation Analyst [email protected] Colorado State Pupil Transportation Association (CSPTA) Fleet Service Committee Special thanks to Amanda Crissup Boulder Valley School District Transportation Brian Vasina Academy 20 School District Transportation http://www.cde.state.co.us/transportation Page 5 of 361 Page 6 of 361 Vehicle Inspection Program This program is established to ensure reasonable and adequate standards of safety and inspection of vehicles used to provide transportation and support student programs. The CDE Transportation Unit shall be responsible for administering and monitoring this inspection program to ensure compliance. This guide is structured to provide the information, form instruction, and criteria for operating a comprehensive Vehicle Inspection Program. Along with program requirements, this guide contains information for record keeping, forms for reporting and recording the inspections, and procedures for inspecting the various vehicle components/systems. This guide should clarify many of the gray areas that occur when operating a Vehicle Inspection Program. However, this guide will not answer all technical or interpretive questions nor will it eliminate the need for trained personnel to exercise professional judgment when performing vehicle inspections. The emphasis of ALL vehicle inspections is "SAFETY" and in every case, the districts, charter schools, certified outside inspection sites, and inspectors must exercise judgment to ensure the greatest degree of safety for vehicle operators, passengers, and other motorists. Resources used in the preparation of this guide are as follows: • 1 CCR 301-25 Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles • http://www.cde.state.co.us/transportation/1ccr301-252015 National Standards for School Buses and Operations http://www.nasdpts.org/ncstonline/Documents/NCST%202015%20Specifications %20and%20Procedures%2011.1.16.pdf • Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2011-title49-vol6/pdf/CFR-2011-title49- vol6-part571.pdf • Service and Repair Manuals from various school bus body and chassis manufacturers' • Other Industry Standards for Maintenance and Repair Procedures State Statute: Colorado law provides for the State Board of Education to adopt and enforce regulations governing the safe operation of school buses used for the transportation of students pursuant to Sections 22-51-107, 22-51-108 and 42-4- 1904 C.R.S. Inspection and Preventive maintenance requirements can be found in the following two documents: • 1 CCR 301-25 Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Page 7 of 361 Vehicles http://www.cde.state.co.us/transportation/1ccr301-252015 • 1 CCR 301-26 Colorado Rules for the Operation, Maintenance and Inspection of School Transportation Vehicles http://www.sos.state.co.us/CCR/GenerateRulePdf.do?ruleVersionId=6941&fileN ame=1%20CCR%20301-26 Exemptions: 1
Recommended publications
  • Clean Buses for New York Kids How Electric School Buses Can Create Healthy Communities, Good Jobs, and Clean Rides for Kids in New York
    Clean Buses for New York Kids How Electric School Buses Can Create Healthy Communities, Good Jobs, and Clean Rides for Kids in New York By Ian Elder, Jobs to Move America Photo credit: Minnesota DOT/Flickr Clean Buses for New York Kids How Electric School Buses Can Create Healthy Communities, Good Jobs, and Clean Rides for Kids in New York By Ian Elder, Jobs to Move America TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary......................................................................................................ii Introduction ...................................................................................................................1 Section I: School Bus Services in New York.................................................................1 Section II: Economics and Performance of Electric School Buses...............................3 Section III: Funding Investments in Electric School Buses...........................................6 Section IV: Procurement of School Buses and School Bus Services ...........................9 Section V: Integrating Electric School Buses with the Grid ..........................................16 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................24 JobsToMoveAmerica.org /JobsToMoveAmerica @JobsMoveAmerica Clean Buses for New York Kids i Clean Buses for New York Kids: How Electric School Buses Can Create Healthy Communities, Good Jobs, and Clean Rides for Kids in New York By Ian Elder, Jobs to Move America Volkswagon settlement for electric school buses Executive Summary through its New York Truck Voucher Incentive Program, which will help fund up to fifty ESBs. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 2 million New York students relied on the state’s Job quality standards in automotive 46,000 school buses to get to and from school manufacturing have decreased over the last each day. The vast majority of these school several decades; at the same time, jobs in New buses are powered by diesel engines, which York school bus operations have been at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Erie County Technical School Business Partners
    Erie County Technical School Business Partners The following is a list of businesses we have worked with in the past year. We interact with business and industry on a daily basis. As you can imagine, it changes frequently. A. Anthony & Sons A.C. Moore Accu-Cad Accuspec Electronics Action Printing and Business Forms Airgas Great Lake, Inc. Ambassador Banquet Center Ambridge Rose Spa and Salon Angelo's Beauty Supply Angelo's Transmission Art's Bakery Auto Value Parts Store Bay Valley Foods Bayfront Center for Maritime Studies Bel Aire Hotel Bella Salon and Day Spa Best Buy Better Baked Foods Bianchi Honda Bickle's Snack Foods Inc, Troyer Division Bliley Technologies Bobcat of Erie Brevillier Village Bright Beginnings C&T Electric Carlson Erie Cassidy Designs Chernichky Electric Church and Murdock Electric Circulatory Center C.J. Mele Environmental Comfort Care & Resources Inc. Community Chevrolet Contine Corporation Conway & O'Malley Goodyear Corsi Contracting Country Fair County YMCA/Albion Courtyard by Marriott Coventina Day Spa Saved on: October 22, 2015 S:\Highschool\OAC\Business Partners.docx Custom Engineering Company CyberInk LP & Go Erie Czop-Specter, Inc D&E Machine Company Danielle Designs-Kitchen and Bath Dillaman’s Auto Body Drumm & O'Harah Tool Eaton Corporation Edinboro University Elements Salon EMTA-Erie EPM Corporation Erie Business Center Erie County Dept. of Public Safety/911 Erie Institute of Technology Erie Insurance Erie Playhouse Erie Press Systems Erie Team PA CareerLink Eriez Magnetics Fairfield Inn by Marriott Family First Sports Park Fastsigns-Erie Fisher & Ludlow Fort LeBoeuf School District Frederick's Freelance Photography & Art Galbraith MediaAccess Gannon University Gary Miller Chrysler-Plymouth-Jeep General McLane School District Girard School District G.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Energy Use Reduction Plan
    Lake Country Transit Energy Use Reduction Plan Energy Use Reduction, Capital Expenditure, Funding and Management/Training Plan December 2015 Prepared by ICF International 620 Folsom St, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94107 415.677.7100 Lake Country Transit Energy Use Reduction Plan Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1 Energy Use Reduction Plan ............................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Facility ......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Review of Existing Facility and Operations .................................................................................6 1.2.2 Facility, Operations and Maintenance Strategies .......................................................................7 1.3 Vehicle Fleet and Alternative Fuels .......................................................................................... 16 1.3.1 Review of Fleet Operations ...................................................................................................... 16 1.3.2 Alternative Fuel Options .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 NFPA 1917 Standards
    Copyright 2018 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA®). Licensed, by agreement, for individual use and download on 12/12/2018 to Delaware Fire Prev Comm for designated user Sherry Lambertson. No other reproduction or transmission in any form permitted without written permission of NFPA®. For inquiries or to report unauthorized use, contact [email protected]. NFPA® 1917 Standard for Automotive Ambulances 2019{4474F64E-7E00-4BF2-BBD3-B3778A4FF0E1} Customer ID 1029731 Copyright 2018 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA®). Licensed, by agreement, for individual use and download on 12/12/2018 to Delaware Fire Prev Comm for designated user Sherry Lambertson. No other reproduction or transmission in any form permitted without written permission of NFPA®. For inquiries or to report unauthorized use, contact [email protected]. IMPORTANT NOTICES AND DISCLAIMERS CONCERNING NFPA® STANDARDS NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY CONCERNING THE USE OF NFPA STANDARDS NFPA® codes, standards, recommended practices, and guides (“NFPA Standards”), of which the document contained herein is one, are developed through a consensus standards development process approved by the American National Standards Institute. This process brings together volunteers representing varied viewpoints and interests to achieve consensus on fire and other safety issues. While the NFPA administers the process and establishes rules to promote fairness in the development of consensus, it does not independently test, evaluate, or verify the accuracy of any information or the soundness of any judgments contained in NFPA Standards. The NFPA disclaims liability for any personal injury, property, or other damages of any nature whatsoever, whether special, indirect, consequential or compensatory, directly or indirectly resulting from the publication, use of, or reliance on NFPA Standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle List and Driver Assignments
    Effingham County Board of Education Vehicle List 6/30/2013 Vehicle List and Driver Assignments Insurance Veh# Make Year Model Cost Assigned Driver/Location Tag # Vin # Car# Book Value 940 L0163292 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15915 1HVBBACNXSH623821 151 - 941 L016393 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15916 1HVBBACN1SH623822 153 - 942 L016394 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 BB 66 15917 1HVBBACN3SH623823 152 - 944 L016396 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15918 1HVBBACN7SH623825 155 - 945 L016397 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15919 1HVBBACN9SH623826 156 - 946 L016398 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15920 1HVBBACNOSH623827 158 - 947 L016399 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15921 1HVBBACN2SH623828 157 - 951 L020327 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 BB 66 15923 1FDXB80C1SVA75535 165 - 952 L020328 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15924 1FDXB80C3SVA75536 164 - 953 L020329 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15925 1FDXB80C5SVA75537 168 - 954 L020330 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15926 1FDXB80CXSVA79843 169 - 956 L020332 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15928 1FDXB80C8SVA76228 166 - 962 L024118 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15963 1FDXB80C5VVA03628 176 - 963 L024119 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15964 1FDXB80C7VVA03629 175 - 964 L024117 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 54 15965 1FDXB80C3VVA03627 177 - 965 L024116 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 54 15966 1FDXB80C1VVA03626 178 - 970 L028102 1997 97 INT 44,597.30 Spare BB 66 16029 1HVBBABN8VH496962 181 - 971 L028103 1997 97 INT 44,597.30 Spare BB 66 16048 1HVBBABNXVH496963 182 - 973 L028105
    [Show full text]
  • IC Bus Charging Fundamentals
    September 16, 2020 Introduction by Central Coast Clean Cities Coalition Grant Updates Santa Barbara County APCD SLO County APCD Central Coast Community Energy Update Electric School Bus Presentations The Lion Electric Company A-Z Bus Sales BusWest Creative Bus Sales Q&A Session • C5 is a group of local stakeholders whose mission is to expand the use of alternative fuel vehicles and fueling infrastructure in Santa Barbara and SLO Counties • Part of National Clean Cities Program • C-5.org Alternative & Renewable Fuels Fuel Economy Vehicle Trip • Biodiesel • Fuel efficient vehicles Elimination • Driving habits • Electricity • Telecommuting • Vehicle maintenance • Ridesharing • Ethanol (E85) • Biking • Hydrogen Idle Reduction • Walking • Natural gas • Technologies • Behavioral changes • Propane Alex Economou Coordinator Central Coast Clean Cities Coalition (C5) (805) 961-8894 [email protected] ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/auctionproceeds/lowincomemapfull.htm https://www.ourair.org/clean-air-grants-for-buses/ Application Internal Grant Offer Signed Internal Grant Submission Review (if eligible) Offer Review Execution After Grant Execution: Bus Post Bus Reimburse Annual Delivery Purchase Inspection Salvage ment Reports SCHOOL BUS INCENTIVES The SLO County APCD School Bus Incentive Program provides funding for replacement or retrofit of public school buses County-wide public school bus fleet numbers more than 200 Since 2001, SLO County APCD has administered $5.9 million in grants for local school districts – including 75 retrofits, 43 replacements, 3 repowers NEW E-BUS = $400K + FUNDING: APPROX. $200K FROM SLO APCD SLO COUNTY APCD AVAILABLE FUNDS AB 617 CAP Incentive funding available for projects in low- income communities; amount TBD; application period is October – November.
    [Show full text]
  • BENDIX EFFORTS SUPPORT MAKING SCHOOL BUSES EVEN SAFER National School Bus Safety Week Puts Spotlight on the Safest Form of Student Transportation
    News Release For further information, please contact: Barbara Gould or Ken Kesegich Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC Marcus Thomas LLC (440) 329-9609 (888) 482-4455 [email protected] [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BENDIX EFFORTS SUPPORT MAKING SCHOOL BUSES EVEN SAFER National School Bus Safety Week Puts Spotlight on the Safest Form of Student Transportation ELYRIA, Ohio – Oct. 22, 2019 – The National Association for Pupil Transportation (NAPT) has its eyes on a school year free of student transportation fatalities – and advanced vehicle safety technologies are a key to reaching that goal. Bendix (Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC and Bendix Spicer Foundation Brake LLC) is proud to work with school districts and vehicle manufacturers across North America in pursuit of safer student transportation as NAPT marks National School Bus Safety Week Oct. 21-25. The theme of this year’s National School Bus Safety Week is “My School Bus – The Safest Form of Student Transportation.” The theme reflects National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) data showing that the classic yellow school bus is 70 times safer than walking, bicycling, or riding in a passenger car or light truck to and from school. “Even so, a single school bus collision is one too many,” said TJ Thomas, director of marketing and customer solutions – Controls, at Bendix, the North American leader in the development and manufacture of intelligent, integrated active safety, air management, and braking solutions for commercial vehicles. “Bendix and all its industry partners are working tirelessly to help keep student passengers safe, and to support the school bus drivers who oversee their daily travels.” -more- BENDIX EFFORTS SUPPORT MAKING SCHOOL BUSES EVEN SAFER Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 32 VEHICLE RECALLS by MANUFACTURER, 2000 Report Prepared 1/16/2008
    Page 1 of 32 VEHICLE RECALLS BY MANUFACTURER, 2000 Report Prepared 1/16/2008 MANUFACTURER RECALLS VEHICLES ACCUBUIL T, INC 1 8 AM GENERAL CORPORATION 1 980 AMERICAN EAGLE MOTORCYCLE CO 1 14 AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO 8 212,212 AMERICAN SUNDIRO MOTORCYCLE 1 2,183 AMERICAN SUZUKI MOTOR CORP. 4 25,023 AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORP. 5 1,441 APRILIA USA INC. 2 409 ASTON MARTIN 2 666 ATHEY PRODUCTS CORP. 3 304 B. FOSTER & COMPANY, INC. 1 422 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE 11 28,738 BLUE BIRD BODY COMPANY 12 62,692 BUELL MOTORCYCLE CO 4 12,230 CABOT COACH BUILDERS, INC. 1 818 CARPENTER INDUSTRIES, INC. 2 6,838 CLASSIC LIMOUSINE 1 492 CLASSIC MANUFACTURING, INC. 1 8 COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC. 8 5,271 COACHMEN RV COMPANY 1 576 COLLINS BUS CORPORATION 1 286 COUNTRY COACH INC 6 519 CRANE CARRIER COMPANY 1 138 DABRYAN COACH BUILDERS 1 723 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 30 6,700,752 DAMON CORPORATION 3 824 DAVINCI COACHWORKS, INC 1 144 D'ELEGANT CONVERSIONS, INC. 1 34 DORSEY TRAILERS, INC. 1 210 DUTCHMEN MANUFACTURING, INC 1 105 ELDORADO NATIONAL 1 173 ELECTRIC TRANSIT, INC. 1 54 ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 1 40 E-ONE, INC. 1 3 EUROPA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2 242 EXECUTIVE COACH BUILDERS 1 702 FEATHERLITE LUXURY COACHES 1 83 FEATHERLITE, INC. 2 3,235 FEDERAL COACH, LLC 1 230 FERRARI NORTH AMERICA 8 1,601 FLEETWOOD ENT., INC. 5 12, 119 FORD MOTOR COMPANY 60 7,485,466 FOREST RIVER, INC. 1 115 FORETRAVEL, INC. 3 478 FOURWINNS 2 2,276 FREIGHTLINER CORPORATION 27 233,032 FREIGHTLINER LLC 1 803 GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Public School Children Move with Propane
    Success Story April 2004 Portland Public School Children Move with Propane Portland, located in northwest Oregon, is a city of to concerns about increasing fuel prices and increasing- over 500,000 people in a 130 square mile area. In ly stringent air quality regulations, the school district December of 2001, Money magazine rated Portland as turned to propane as a fuel source for its fleet of buses one of the best cities in America to live, due partly to and the fleet of contractor-owned buses that provided “avoiding urban sprawl and overcrowding,” and “plac- transportation services. ing a premium on green space, culture and an acces- sible city center.” Freightliner LLC, a maker of medium Portland Public Schools began converting its bus fleet and heavy trucks, has agreed with this assessment and to propane in 1983, and stipulated that its bus contrac- makes its corporate home here and has also located its tor was to do the same. Since that time, the propane styling and test centers in Portland. bus fleet has continued to grow. At present, the school district has a total of 325 buses (85 district-owned and 240 contractor-owned), all of which operate on pro- pane. The district-owned buses are smaller Type A school buses on cutaway van chassis. These vehicles are converted to run on propane, and the conver- sions are currently costing the school district $3,000 to $4,000 per bus. These propane buses travel 3.5 million miles per year and use 1.4 million gallons of fuel per year.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS and PROCEDURES
    NATIONAL SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS and PROCEDURES 2005 Revised Edition Adopted by: THE FOURTEENTH NATIONAL CONGRESS ON SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION Central Missouri State University Warrensburg, Missouri May 15-19, 2005 Co-Sponsored by: National Association of State Directors of Pupil Transportation Services National Association for Pupil Transportation National School Transportation Association School Transportation Section, National Safety Council School Bus Manufacturers Technical Council Missouri Safety Center, Central Missouri State University This publication is available from: Missouri Safety Center Central Missouri State University Humphreys Suite 201 Warrensburg, MO 64093 Phone: (660) 543-4830 Fax: (660) 543-4482 iii iv v Infants / Toddlers and Pre-school Children ..................................................................................165 Transportation Services for Pre-school Children with Disabilities .................................168 vi vii viii FOREWORD The 2005 National Congress on School Transportation was the latest in a series beginning in 1939 and continuing in 1945, 1948, 1951, 1954, 1959, 1964, 1970, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995 and 2000. All congresses (referred to as “conferences” before 2005) have been made up of offi cial representatives of state departments of education, public safety, motor vehicles, and police or other state agencies having state-wide responsibilities for the administration of student transportation; local school district personnel; contract operators; advisors from industry; and representatives from other interested professional organizations and groups. Each conference has resulted in one or more publications that contain the recommendations of that particular conference. The recommendation of specifi cations and procedures for school buses and their operation has been a major purpose of all conferences. The 1939 Conference was called for this sole purpose and formulated a set of recommended standards for school buses of 20 or more passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Page. CLAIMS of the PRINCIPLE of RPTATION of TURBINE ONE
    Page. CLAIMS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF RPTATION OF TURBINE ONE. What to claim is: 1. Rotation is obtained of the cross axial and axial bearing mounted turbine rotors, by shielding the returnblades partially or completely and uncovering the pushblades partially or completely. 2. Rotation of horizontal and vertical mounted rotor operable in bearings comprising at least three rotor blades radial and axially projecting its form expending from the hub. Cross-axial rotation of turbine rotors by means of shielding vane, or wind screen shielding the return blades partially or completely and uncovering the pushblades partially or completely for fluid to be channelled cross axially trough the intakes and impact coaxial and horizontally on the transverse projecting turbine rotor blades causing rotation of the prime mover, drivetrain by the converting kinetic energy into mechanical energy and into electric energy by means of a constant transmission turbine gearbox and lubricant system mechanical coupled in rotational mode with the electric generator rotor, comprising a cylindrical permanent or electromagnet coupled electrically to the exciter electrically connected with the disk magnet and axially opposing stator coils or disk or plates or massive electric conductive material disk or cylinder. 3. Rotation of the horizontal and vertical turbine rotor is obtained in clockwise direction and in counterclockwiswise direction. Generating AC current or dc current. Defines the rotor by at least two axial halves exposed axially for cross-axial flow axial flow and/or for perpendicularly flow turbine rotors. A left and right axial halve, or upper and lower axial halve which form the returnblades section and the pushblades intake and exhaust sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Bird. a Heritage of Looking Ahead. 2015 Annual Report PANTONE 541 C PANTONE 541 C
    PANTONE 541 C PANTONE 541 C PANTONE 541 PC (100C 57M 0Y 38K) PANTONE 541 PC (100C 57M 0Y 38K) C=100 M=51 Y=0 K=31 (From Marketing) C=100 M=51 Y=0 K=31 (From Marketing) Blue Bird. A heritage of looking ahead. 2015 Annual Report PANTONE 541 C PANTONE 541 C PANTONE 541 PC (100C 57M 0Y 38K) PANTONE 541 PC (100C 57M 0Y 38K) C=100 M=51 Y=0 K=31 (From Marketing) C=100 M=51 Y=0 K=31 (From Marketing) WHAT WE STAND FOR We come to work every day with one common goal—to design, build, sell and service the world’s finest school bus. That’s what we do—no distractions, no competing priorities. We are heirs to a rich legacy, one of listening to our customers, embracing their needs, and delivering innovations that lead the market. We commit ourselves to four driving priorities— safety, quality, durability and serviceability. We embody the interests of every child that rides us, every driver that drives us, every service technician that services us and every district that buys us. More than a business, this work is our heritage, and we have been at it since 1927—that’s purpose driven. BLUE BIRD’S ICONIC HISTORY Blue Bird #1 Built by Company Founder Albert L. Luce Sr. 1927 1937 First All-Steel Body School Bus 1948 First All American Forward Engine Bus 1951 First All American on Proprietary Chassis 1957 1975 Redesign of Conventional Bus First Micro Bird® 1957 1967 1988 Construction Upgrade of First TC2000 Type D Bus of Current Conventional Bus Manufacturing Facility 88 YEARS OF INNOVATION SOLD OVER 550,000 BUSES SINCE 1927 2013 2015 First Sigma Type D First
    [Show full text]