DOCSLIB.ORG

Pu'u Maka'ala Natural Area Reserve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pu'u Maka'ala Natural Area Reserve Pu‘u Maka‘ala Natural Area Reserve (NAR) Management Plan September 2013 Department of Land and Natural Resources Division of Forestry and Wildlife 1151 Punchbowl Street, Room 325 Honolulu, HI 96813 Page 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................5 PU‘U MAKA‘ALA NAR: BIOPHYSICAL RESOURCES ...........................................................6 Location ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Topography, Climate, Geology, and Soils .................................................................................. 8 Ecosystems and Species ............................................................................................................ 11 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................. 11 Wildlife ................................................................................................................................. 17 PU‘U MAKA‘ALA NAR: SOCIOCULTURAL RESOURCES ..................................................21 Land Use ................................................................................................................................... 21 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... 23 Archaeological and Historic Sites ............................................................................................. 28 Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................. 29 Regional Partnerships ............................................................................................................... 29 SUMMARY OF MAJOR THREATS ...........................................................................................32 Invasive Species - Ungulates .................................................................................................... 32 Invasive Species - Plants ........................................................................................................... 32 Invasive Species - Other Animals ............................................................................................. 33 Fire ............................................................................................................................................ 34 Additional Threats - Disease, Climate Change, Volcanic Activity, Illegal Human Activity ... 34 OVERVIEW OF EXISTING MANAGEMENT ...........................................................................35 Ungulate Management .............................................................................................................. 35 Weed Management ................................................................................................................... 36 Habitat Protection and Rare Species Restoration ..................................................................... 41 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ......................................................................................................43 Ungulate Management .............................................................................................................. 43 Weed Management ................................................................................................................... 47 Habitat Protection and Rare Species Restoration Program....................................................... 49 Fire Prevention and Response ................................................................................................... 51 Monitoring ................................................................................................................................ 52 Public Access, Outreach and Education ................................................................................... 53 Enforcement .............................................................................................................................. 59 Page 2 Partnership Collaboration ......................................................................................................... 60 Infrastructure and Other Actions .............................................................................................. 61 BUDGET .......................................................................................................................................63 REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................................64 Appendix A – Plant Species List ...................................................................................................70 Appendix B - Pu‘u Maka‘ala Birds (birds historically/currently found in or near the NAR). .................................................................................................................................80 Appendix C - Insects and related arthropods, including land snails, collected and/or recorded from Pu’u Maka’ala NAR (Preston 1995). .........................................................81 Page 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pu‘u Maka‘ala Natural Area Reserve (NAR or Reserve) is situated on lands within the upper portions of Waiākea ahupua‘a of the South Hilo District and the kalana (sub-district) of ‘Ōla‘a within the District of Puna. It was formally established in 1981 by Governor’s Executive Order 3102 from lands withdrawn from the ‘Ōla‘a and Waiākea Forest Reserves (FR). The original 12,106 acre (ac) (4,899 hectare (ha)) Reserve was created to protect native wet forest. In November 2010, an additional 6,600 acres (2,671 ha) of the former Kūlani Correctional Facility property was added to the NAR, bringing the total acreage of the NAR to 18,706 acres (7,570 ha). This addition protects additional forest and native species as well as links important conservation areas including the ‘Ōla‘a Tract of Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park (HAVO) and the upper elevation native forests of Kīlauea, Keauhou, and Upper Waiākea. These forests comprise an important water resource for the lower Puna and Hilo regions of Hawai‘i island, and provide exceptional habitat for a wide diversity of native plant and animal species. The primary threats to biodiversity and watershed integrity at Pu‘u Maka‘ala NAR are feral ungulates (wild, hoofed animals such as pigs, sheep, goats and cattle), especially feral pigs (Sus scrofa) and non-native, invasive weeds. This management plan updates the 1989 Management Plan for Pu‘u Maka‘ala NAR to reflect management accomplishments and current management needs of this reserve, including proposed management for the Kūlani addition. Governor Abercrombie’s A New Day in Hawai‘i plan calls for the stewardship of the natural resources that our survival, economy, and quality of life depend on. Priority actions of this Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) initiative include managing invasive species, increasing Hawaii’s ability to withstand impacts from climate change, and restoring capabilities of the DLNR by finding additional sources of funding. The New Day Status Report also tasks the DLNR to ensure mauka watersheds are fully functioning so fresh water resources can be utilized and enjoyed by the people of Hawai`i in perpetuity. The Rain Follows the Forest is the Department’s plan to implement these central goals of the Abercrombie administration. The Rain Follows the Forest identifies priority watersheds, including Pu‘u Maka‘ala NAR, and outlines on-the-ground actions and projects required to protect and sustain Hawaii’s critical water sources. The Pu‘u Maka‘ala Management Plan is aligned with the priorities and actions identified in The Rain follows the Forest. The overall management goal is to protect, maintain, and enhance Pu‘u Maka‘ala’s unique natural, cultural, and geological resources. Management programs have been developed to support this overall goal and include the following: 1. Ungulate Management 2. Weed Management 3. Habitat Protection and Rare Species Restoration 4. Monitoring 5. Public Access, Outreach and Education 6. Fire Prevention and Response 7. Enforcement 8. Partnership Collaboration Page 4 9. Infrastructure and Other Actions The 2013 Management Plan for Pu‘u Maka‘ala outlines the planned management activities in Pu‘u Maka‘ala over the next fifteen years, along with an estimated budget for full implementation. INTRODUCTION The Natural Area Reserves System (NARS) was created in 1971 by the Hawai‘i State Legislature to “preserve in perpetuity specific land and water areas which support communities, as relatively unmodified as possible, of the natural flora and fauna, as well as geological sites, of Hawai‘i (HRS § 195-1).” The legislature further found that these unique natural assets should be protected and preserved, both for the enjoyment of future generations and to provide baselines against which changes to Hawaii’s environment can be measured. The NARS is administered by the Hawai‘i Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW). NARS Commission members act in an advisory capacity for the Board of Land and Natural Resources, which sets policies
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 the Diptera of Lundy Have Been Poorly Studied in the Past
    Swallow 3 Spotted Flytcatcher 28 *Jackdaw I Pied Flycatcher 5 Blue Tit I Dunnock 2 Wren 2 Meadow Pipit 10 Song Thrush 7 Pied Wagtail 4 Redwing 4 Woodchat Shrike 1 Blackbird 60 Red-backed Shrike 1 Stonechat 2 Starling 15 Redstart 7 Greenfinch 5 Black Redstart I Goldfinch 1 Robin I9 Linnet 8 Grasshopper Warbler 2 Chaffinch 47 Reed Warbler 1 House Sparrow 16 Sedge Warbler 14 *Jackdaw is new to the Lundy ringing list. RECOVERIES OF RINGED BIRDS Guillemot GM I9384 ringed 5.6.67 adult found dead Eastbourne 4.12.76. Guillemot GP 95566 ringed 29.6.73 pullus found dead Woolacombe, Devon 8.6.77 Starling XA 92903 ringed 20.8.76 found dead Werl, West Holtun, West Germany 7.10.77 Willow Warbler 836473 ringed 14.4.77 controlled Portland, Dorset 19.8.77 Linnet KC09559 ringed 20.9.76 controlled St Agnes, Scilly 20.4.77 RINGED STRANGERS ON LUNDY Manx Shearwater F.S 92490 ringed 4.9.74 pullus Skokholm, dead Lundy s. Light 13.5.77 Blackbird 3250.062 ringed 8.9.75 FG Eksel, Belgium, dead Lundy 16.1.77 Willow Warbler 993.086 ringed 19.4.76 adult Calf of Man controlled Lundy 6.4.77 THE DIPTERA (TWO-WINGED FLffiS) OF LUNDY ISLAND R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 The Diptera of Lundy have been poorly studied in the past. Therefore, it is hoped that the production of an annotated checklist, giving an indication of the habits and general distribution of the species recorded will encourage other entomologists to take an interest in the Diptera of Lundy.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Lepidoptera Fauna of the Madeira Islands Part 2
    Beitr. Ent. Keltern ISSN 0005 - 805X 51 (2001) 1 S. 161 - 213 14.09.2001 Contribution to the Lepidoptera fauna of the Madeira Islands Part 2. Tineidae, Acrolepiidae, Epermeniidae With 127 figures Reinhard Gaedike and Ole Karsholt Summary A review of three families Tineidae, Epermeniidae and Acrolepiidae in the Madeira Islands is given. Three new species: Monopis henderickxi sp. n. (Tineidae), Acrolepiopsis mauli sp. n. and A. infundibulosa sp. n. (Acrolepiidae) are described, and two new combinations in the Tineidae: Ceratobia oxymora (MEYRICK) comb. n. and Monopis barbarosi (KOÇAK) comb. n. are listed. Trichophaga robinsoni nom. n. is proposed as a replacement name for the preoccupied T. abrkptella (WOLLASTON, 1858). The first record from Madeira of the family Acrolepiidae (with Acrolepiopsis vesperella (ZELLER) and the two above mentioned new species) is presented, and three species of Tineidae: Stenoptinea yaneimarmorella (MILLIÈRE), Ceratobia oxymora (MEY­ RICK) and Trichophaga tapetgella (LINNAEUS) are reported as new to the fauna of Madeira. The Madeiran records given for Tsychoidesfilicivora (MEYRICK) are the first records of this species outside the British Isles. Tineapellionella LINNAEUS, Monopis laevigella (DENIS & SCHIFFERMULLER) and M. imella (HÜBNER) are dele­ ted from the list of Lepidoptera found in Madeira. All species and their genitalia are figured, and informa­ tion on bionomy is presented. Zusammenfassung Es wird eine Übersicht über die drei Familien Tineidae, Epermeniidae und Acrolepiidae auf den Madeira Inseln gegeben. Die drei neuen Arten Monopis henderickxi sp. n. (Tineidae), Acrolepiopsis mauli sp. n. und A. infundibulosa sp. n. (Acrolepiidae) werden beschrieben, zwei neue Kombinationen bei den Tineidae: Cerato­ bia oxymora (MEYRICK) comb.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Tyoj5llllt . I-Bland Plants
    Recovery Plan for tYOJ5llllt. i-bland Plants RECOVERY PLAN FOR MULTI-ISLAND PLANTS Published by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: Date: / / As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most ofour nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use ofour land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values ofour national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests ofall our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island Territories under U.S. administration. DISCLAIMER PAGE Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance ofrecovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Costs indicated for task implementation and/or time for achievement ofrecovery are only estimates and are subject to change. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval ofany individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, otherthan the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position ofthe U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pritchardia Schattaueri
    Plants Lo‘ulu Pritchardia schattaueri SPECIES STATUS: Federally Listed as Endangered Genetic Safety Net Species IUCN Red List Ranking ‐ CR A1ce+2ce, B1+2abcde, D Hawai‘i Natural Heritage Ranking ‐ Critically Imperiled (G1) NTBG Endemism – Island of Hawai‘i Critical Habitat ‐ Designated SPECIES INFORMATION: This species is known only from South Kona on the island of Hawai‘i. P. schattaueri is a large fan palm 30‐40 m tall, with a gray trunk. The areas where this species has been found have been extensively altered by agriculture. Rats are also known to feed on Hawaiian Pritchardia fruits. DISTRIBUTION: South Kona, island of Hawai‘i. ABUNDANCE: Only 12 individuals in three subpopulations remain in the wild on Hawai‘i. LOCATION AND CONDITION OF KEY HABITAT: Pritchardia schattaueri grows in ‘ōhi‘a‐dominated Lowland Mesic Forest, at elevations between 600 and 800 m (1,970 to 2,600 ft). Known to grow in mesic forests on old lava. The last remaining plants are located on private land. THREATS: Grazing and trampling by cattle and feral pigs; Competition from alien plant taxa, like strawberry guava, common guava, kikuyu grass, Christmas berry and thimbleberry; Seed predation by rats; Residential and commercial development; Habitat change due to volcanic activity; Extinction from naturally occurring events; Reduced reproductive vigor due to the small number of existing populations. CONSERVATION ACTIONS: The goals of conservation actions are not only to protect current populations, but also to establish new populations to reduce the risk of extinction. The USFWS has developed a recovery plan that details specific tasks needed to recover this species.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Release of the Insects Calophya Latiforceps
    United States Department of Field Release of the Insects Agriculture Calophya latiforceps Marketing and Regulatory (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) and Programs Pseudophilothrips ichini Animal and Plant Health Inspection (Thysanoptera: Service Phlaeothripidae) for Classical Biological Control of Brazilian Peppertree in the Contiguous United States Environmental Assessment, May 2019 Field Release of the Insects Calophya latiforceps (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) and Pseudophilothrips ichini (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) for Classical Biological Control of Brazilian Peppertree in the Contiguous United States Environmental Assessment, May 2019 Agency Contact: Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd., Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action. Additional information can be found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Coconut and Other Palm Trees Posted on August 8, 2019 by Leslie Lang
    HOME HOURS & DIRECTIONS GARDEN SLIDESHOW GARDEN NEWS & BLOG Coconut and Other Palm Trees Posted on August 8, 2019 by Leslie Lang Of all the types of palm trees, many people here in Hawai‘i are most familiar with the coconut palm, Cocos nucifera. It’s the tree that says, “tropics.” But there’s so much more to the coconut palm. Its fruit, the niu or coconut, is so useful that early Polynesians brought it along to sustain themselves when they sailed across the Pacific to Hawai‘i. Polynesians knew that when they settled on new islands, they could plant coconuts and make use of the entire tree that grew—not only the coconut meat and water, but also the leaves, the wood, the fiber, and every other part. According to the book Canoe Plants of Ancient Hawaii, “Besides drink, food and shade, niu offers the possibilities of housing, thatching, hats, baskets, furniture, mats, cordage, clothing, charcoal, brooms, fans, ornaments, musical instruments, shampoo, containers, implements and oil for fuel, light, ointments, soap and more.” The only palm tree that’s native to Hawai‘i is the loulu (Pritchardia). There are perhaps 19 loulu species in Hawai‘i and a few related species in Tahiti and Fiji. Hawai‘i used to have large loulu forests, but while some loulu still survive in the wild, many disappeared because of rats, pigs, goats, and even people. Within the genus Pritchardia, there are 25 species of palms native to the tropical Pacific Islands. In Hawai‘i, as many as 19 species of Pritchardia are endemic, and some of them are categorized as endangered, rare, or vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants of Southeastern Polynesia. 3
    Plants of Southeastern Polynesia. 3. F. R. FoSBERG1 and M.-H. SACHET1 Abstract In this paper are presented critical notes and records of species of Ophioglossum (Ophi­ oglossaceae), Waltheria (Sterculiaceae), Alyxia (Apocynaceae) and Morinda (Rubiaceae), a new varietal combination and two new varieties in Alyxia stellata, and a discussion of the generic separation of Ochrosia and Neiosperma (Apocynaceae). Ophioglossum pendulum var. falcatum (Presl) Fosberg, 0cc. Pap. Bishop Mus. 23 :29, 1962. 0. pendulum L. f. var. pendulum is common at low and moderate elevations in Tahiti. A collection from 1100 m elevation, south of Orohena, MacDaniels 1533 (US) is perfectly typical var. falcatum, apparently the first record of this variety from the Society Islands and from southern Polynesia. It is by far the commoner form in the Hawaiian Islands. The typical form, var. pendulum, with long pendant sterile parts of the fronds is common in Tahiti but very rare in Hawaii. Waltheria tomentosa (J. R. & G. Forst.) St. John, Nat. Can. 98:573, 1971.2 Lophanthus tomentosus J. R. & G. Forst., Char. Gen. 14, 1775; 28, pl. 14, 1776. Waltheria lophanthus Forst. f., Prodr. 47, 1786. It is surprising that no one had made this transfer. Of course, the application of the " Kew Rule" would have made it inappropriate prior to the formulation of the modern International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature at the Vienna Congress in 1905. However, there seems to be no reason for not now taking up the oldest available epithet for this plant. This species is still to be found on the dry sides of most of the Marquesas and on the smaller, low dry islands of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • United States of America
    anran Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GLOBAL FOREST RESOURCES ASSESSMENT COUNTRY REPORTS NITED TATES OF MERICA U S A FRA2005/040 Rome, 2005 FRA 2005 – Country Report 040 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The Forest Resources Assessment Programme Sustainably managed forests have multiple environmental and socio-economic functions important at the global, national and local scales, and play a vital part in sustainable development. Reliable and up- to-date information on the state of forest resources - not only on area and area change, but also on such variables as growing stock, wood and non-wood products, carbon, protected areas, use of forests for recreation and other services, biological diversity and forests’ contribution to national economies - is crucial to support decision-making for policies and programmes in forestry and sustainable development at all levels. FAO, at the request of its member countries, regularly monitors the world’s forests and their management and uses through the Forest Resources Assessment Programme. This country report forms part of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 (FRA 2005), which is the most comprehensive assessment to date. More than 800 people have been involved, including 172 national correspondents and their colleagues, an Advisory Group, international experts, FAO staff, consultants and volunteers. Information has been collated from 229 countries and territories for three points in time: 1990, 2000 and 2005. The reporting framework for FRA 2005 is based on the thematic elements of sustainable forest management acknowledged in intergovernmental forest-related fora and includes more than 40 variables related to the extent, condition, uses and values of forest resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Article ISSN 1175-5334 (Online Edition) Urn:Lsid:Zoobank.Org:Pub:8D7DBC1C-E597-4561-8AB4-DA6297CBAAA6
    Zootaxa 3497: 1–16 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8D7DBC1C-E597-4561-8AB4-DA6297CBAAA6 Review of the Campsicnemus fumipennis group (Diptera: Dolichopodidae) in the Hawaiian Islands, with descriptions of new species and corrections of misidentifications NEAL L. EVENHUIS Hawaii Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Species of the Campsicnemus fumipennis group in the Hawaiian Islands are reviewed. Campsicnemus fumipennis Parent, previously thought to be widespread in the Hawaiian Islands is found to be restricted only to the islands of Moloka‘i and Maui (= geological Maui Nui). Based on comparison of the lectotype female of C. fumipennis with females of C. flaviventer Hardy & Kohn, C. flaviventer is found to be synonymous with C. fumipennis, syn. nov. Three new species, two of them previously misidentified as either C. fumipennis or C. flaviventer, are described and illustrated; all are island endemics: C. leucostoma, sp. nov. (Hawai‘i), C. spectabulus, sp. nov. (O‘ahu), and C. aniani, sp. nov. (Hawai‘i). The first description of the male of true C. fumipennis is given, a key to species of the C. fumipennis group is presented, and a table of rearing records for immatures of species in the C. fumipennis group is given. Key words: Taxonomy, Diptera, Dolichopodidae, Campsicnemus, Hawaiian Islands, O‘ahu, Maui, Moloka‘i, Hawai‘i, Maui Nui Introduction The well isolated and tiny Pacific archipelago of the Hawaiian Islands is home to an incredible 170 or so endemic species of the predaceous long-legged fly genus Campsicnemus Haliday—with many more newly discovered species awaiting description.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey for Alkaloids in Hawaiian Plants, III
    A Survey for Alkaloids in Hawaiian Plants, III PAUL J. SCHEUER, LAURA P. HORIGAN, AND WEBSTER R. HUDGINS! IN CONTINUATION of our systematic survey for METHODS alkaloids in Hawaiian plants2 we have collected The following procedure is the one which is and tested additional plant species on Oahu, recommended by Raffauf (1958). Hawaii, Maui, and Kauai. Of the 71 samples A 20 g. sample of dried plant parts was in the present report, 15 represent species which ground in a Waring blender with the addition had been tested by us previously. These results of some 95 per cent ethanol. The material was are included here since 13 of these samples were then extracted with 150 m!. of boiling ethanol collected at different locations and 2 gave test for 2 hr. The insoluble plant parts were removed results at variance with previous findings. All by suction filtration and the alcoholic filtrate specimens were collected from living plants. was evaporated to dryness on a steam bath un­ In parts I and II of this survey testing for der reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved alkaloids was carried out as described by Webb by stirring with a mixture of 50 ml. ether and phytoc~emical (1949', 1952) in his classical 50 ml. of 5 per cent hydrochloric acid. Part of study of the Australian flora. In folloWIng up the aqueous acidic extract containing the non­ some positive tests as indicated in the survey quaternary alkaloids was tested with Mayer's with actual isolation of alkaloids on a prepara­ reagent. The validity of a positive alkaloid test tive scale, it has been noted by us and by others was confirmed by adding powdered sodium (e.g., Raffauf, 19'58) that extraction and test­ chloride to another portion of the acidic ~xtract.
    [Show full text]
  • Guava Arthropod Seasonality and Control of Fruit Flies in South Florida
    Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 112:206-209. 1999. GUAVA ARTHROPOD SEASONALITY AND CONTROL OF FRUIT FLIES IN SOUTH FLORIDA J. E. Pena, R. Duncan and T. Vasquez leaf footed bugs, Leptoglossus sp, mealybugs, Phenacoccus University of Florida spp. An unsprayed grove was surveyed for arthropod pests Tropical Research and Education Center seasonal density from July 1996 through June 1998. Leaves, Homestead, FL flowers and fruits of randomly selected trees were inspected weekly. Populations of Caribbean fruit fly were monitored us ing McPhail traps and tests of efficacy of control tactics (Spi- M. Hennessey nosad, Agrimek), lures (Phloxine B, Nulure) and fruit bagging Environmental Protection Agency showed that fruit bagging is the best method to prevent Carib bean fruit fly infestation to guava fruits in Florida. Additional index words. Anastrepha suspensa, Tegolophus guavae, Brevipalpus, Leptoglossus, Phenacoccus. Introduction Guava, Psidium guajavah., originated in tropical America, Abstract. Guava production has intensified in south Florida. and it is now widely grown all over the tropics and subtropics. However, there is no existing management program for moni At present the major guava producing countries are southern toring guava pests, i.e., Caribbean fruit flies, Anastrepha sus- Asian countries, Hawaiian islands, Cuba, India and South pensa, guava mites, Tegolophus guavae, Brevipalpus sp., and America (Bose and Mitra, 1990). Fruits are in demand for ex port from subtropical Florida. However, exports to California Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. N-01823. We and some other ports are restricted by Caribbean fruit fly, thank A. Castineiras, J. King, P. Mendez, E. Schnell, I. Toledo and W.
    [Show full text]