DOCSLIB.ORG

Figure ES-5 Recommended Preferred Alternative

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Figure ES-5 Recommended Preferred Alternative Sulphur Childress Duncan ¤£69 36 ¤£75 Glenwood 7 271 £ 59 Baylor ¤ 84 Meridian 99 Atoka ¤£ Childress 6 Lake 4 76 7 5 5 53 £287 53 Springer 27 ¤ £177 ¤£283 ¤ OKLAHOMA ¤£70 Quanah £183 ¤ 44 ¤£259 ¨¦§ Antlers 36 71 Healdton 3 Hardeman Indian Nation Toll Road Lake ¤£70 Dickson Murfreesboro Pauline Lone Grove 4 271 Waurika ¤£ Ardmore 99 De Queen Vernon ¤£70 ¤£177 9 ¤£69 ¤£70 6 287 Burkburnett ¤£ 240 35 Hugo £70 ¨¦§ ¤£70 ¤ ARKANSAS 377 Durant Cottle Wilbarger Electra ¤£ 355 Wichita 32 76 North Fork 59 v e r Idabel ¤£ Crowell Buffalo Creek i 27 ¤£62 Paducah 79 R 37 ¤£70 ¤£70 Lake Reservoir 183 Electra 32 d ¤£ Ben Lomond Foard Santa Rosa 1,2,3,4 5,6,7,8Lake e Lake 81 Texoma R Pat Mayse Lake ¤£283 Wichita Falls ¤£ 78 4 25 Lake 148 Nocona ¤£271 87 £71 Henrietta ¤ Caddo Lake Nocona Hubert H. Moss 37 National Grasslands Hope 9,10,11,12 Lake Ashdown Lake ¤£277 Wichita £82 Lake Pottsboro Truscott Brine Lake ¤ Crook 82 Denison Coffee Mill Diversion ¤£ 32 Lake Kemp Lake Paris 41 30 Clay Detroit ¨¦§ ¤£82 Lake 281 Bonham ¤£ ¤£287 Muenster Grayson Clarksville Reservoir Lower £259 29 Montague Cooke Gainesville Va ll e y ¤ Lake Lake Bois d'Arc Creek Lake 83 ¤£ Kickapoo Arrowhead Montague 56 Sherman Lamar £82 Bonham ¤ Baylor 59 Red River 8 82 Lake 82 £ Knox Archer City ¤£ ¤Guthrie 69 82 New Boston King Benjamin ¤£ Kiowa ¤£377 ¤£ Seymour 25 Texarkana Archer Bowie ¤£271 Lake Fannin Bogata Davis ¤£82 121 George Parkhouse 277 Lake 289 75 78 Reservoir II River Crest Lewisville ¤£ 35 ¤£ Caddo u 79 § Ray 37 Lake l p Bowie 114 ¨¦ u h National Grasslands r 160 Cooper City/ S R Lake Roberts Big Creek Delta Amon G. Carter i ¨¦§30 Millers Creek Lake v 59 Cooper e Reservoir 183 Olney Pilot Point r 222 ¤£ Lyndon B. Johnson National Grassland 24 148 George Parkhouse 67 Olney ¤£ Reservoir I £283 6 ¤ Denton 19 16 ¤£281 ¤£287 34 Franklin Wright Patman ¤£59 Lake Commerce Titus 78 77 ¤£71 251 101 Mount Vernon 114 Jack Decatur Collin Hunt Lake Hopkins Haskell McKinney 224 24 11 Sulphur Springs Mount Pleasant Atlanta 79 Lake Denton Jacksboro Bridgeport Lake Cass 29 Young 380 Bridgeport ¤£ Greenville Morris 77 £380 380 Sulphur Springs Cypress ¤ Throckmorton ¤£ Wise 380 Springs y Haskell ¤£ C p 8 Lake r Lake Allen e Daingerfield Stonewall Aspermont 35E Throckmorton Graham 35W §Lewisville s ¨¦§ ¨¦ 66 114 s Linden 3 Lake Graham Lake 283 Lewisville C 199 Stamford Rhome Lavon r ¤£277 Plano 154 Pittsburg e 1 §30 Camp e 155 Lake ¨¦ 16 287 k 2 £ Grapevine ¤ 59 Lake ¤£ Lake LOUISIANA Springtown Eagle Coppell Carrollton Richardson Ray Rockwall Winnsboro 377 Mountain £69 Keller North ¤ GarlandHubbard Lake £271 Johnson Creek Lake Lake ¤ Possum 254 34 Emory Lake Fork Quitman Reservoir Stamford Fort DALLAS/ Marion 67 Kingdom FORT WORTH 635 49 49 Reservoir Wolters 92 ¨¦§ Rains 283 INTERNATIONAL 205 Lake O' The Pines ¤£ Lake Wa tauga AIRPORT White Upshur Jefferson Caddo Quitman 92 281 Hamlin ¤£183 ¤£ Rock Lake Lake Irving Lake Rockwall 182 154 £259 Hurst Ta wa ko ni Lake Gilmer ¤ 820 Mesquite New Terrell Benton 83 Parker ¨¦§ Dallas Wood Gilmer ¤£ 180 Lake ¤£ City Lake White Carl Estes 37 6 Weatherford Lake Wor th Grand Prairie Forney 70 Palo Pinto Settlement Terrell Reservoir Mineral Weatherf or d Arlington Lake Carswell Balch 16 Breckenridge AFB Wills Point Holbrook Springs 80 Anson 180 Palo Pinto Wells ¤£ Grand Saline MountainDallas Mineola ¤£180 Shackelford ¤£ Hubbard Fort Worth Lake Lake Shreveport Roby Creek Creek Albany Benbrook Arlington Hawkins isher Jones Reservoir Forest Hill Lake 43 Stephens Joe Lake 154 83 Crandall 19 ¤£ 20 20 Pool Duncanville Kaufman ¨¦§ 80 Gladewater Lake ¤£ Harrison § Lake Tarrant 277 ¨¦ ¤£287 Lake £ Lake Palo Pinto 171 ¤ Benbrook Lancaster Gladewater Hallsville Lake ¤£377 Cedar Hill De Soto Marshall Bossier Fort Phantom Hill Mansfield Kaufman 243 Canton Daniel Va n Lindale ¨¦§20 City 351 Longview ¤£71 Burleson Van Zandt Gregg 31 6 135 S a Lake b i n e R Granbury 174 Smith Winona i water Abilene Kilgore v e r Merkel ¤£84 20 112 Granbury 64 § Ranger 5,6,7,8, 271 ¨¦ 67 Tyler 149 ¤£ £ Lake Lake ¤ Keene Lake 45 Cherokee Cisco Dyess Air Force Base Eastland Waxahachie ¨¦§ Sweetwater 49 Baird Cisco ¨¦§ 16 108 Hood ¤£79 ¤£281 20 Ennis 9,10,11,12 Lake Lake Cleburne ¨¦§ ¤£287 Cedar 31 Overton Tyler Kirby Lake Lake Squaw Johnson Ellis Creek Lake 155 Clyde Leon ¤£377 Creek Bardwell Reservoir 43 Martin Lake Lake Palestine 110 Nolan Reservoir Lake Taylor Callahan Eastland Pat Cleburne 171 35E Lake Tyler § 34 ¨¦ Lake Forest Grove East 64 Glen Rose Rusk £84 36 Erath 35W Reservoir Athens Carthage ¤ 206 ¨¦§ Henderson 6 Athens Bullard ¤£277 Lake Stephenville Panola Somervell Å55 Troup 84 Abilene ¤£ 70 ¤£81 Henderson Lake 67 Mansfield ¤£ Kerens 315 Murvaul Trinidad ¤£175 135 ¤£59 ¤£183 22 Corsicana Lake ¤£69 ¤£283 DeLeon Lake ¤£77 Navarro Halbert Richland- Chambers 220 174 Lake Oak Lake ¤£287 Reservoir 144 Jacksonville Striker Whitney Hillsboro Creek 84 Proctor ¤£ Navarro Mills 84 Reservoir ¤£83 Lake Lake ¤£ 36 Lake Coleman 204 96 Hill Lake ¤£ 79 Hico ¤£ Whitney 155 Jacksonville Lake Meridian 171 Winters Winters Comanche 31 Aquilla 19 279 206 Center 277 ¤£ Lake Cherokee 259 Lake Comanche 14 Tehuacana Creek Anderson ¤£ Shelby Brownwood Reservoir Rusk 22 Robert E. Lee 281 Bosque Pinkston ¤£377 ¤£ £59 ¤ Reservoir Hords Creek Fairfield 84 Lake Coleman 6 ¤£ 7 158 Runnels Lake Palestine 67 Clifton 16 ¤£ Nacogdoches 147 Coleman Fairfield 22 Brown 21 Nacogdoches 87 35 ¨¦§ To led o Lake Ballinger 67 84 Hamilton 294 Ballinger ¤£ ¤£ Freestone 294 Lake Bend Mexia Nacogdoches Reservoir Lake 218 Å 84 Brownwood ¤£ Mexia §45 San Augustine Teague ¨¦ Hamilton McLennan 21 ¤£67 6 277 ¤£ ¤£84 Tradinghouse 6 WacoCreek Limestone ¤£287 183 Reservoir Mart San Augustine ¤£ 317 Groesbeck Grapeland Lake 6 164 103 Waco Lake 164 Paint Rock Kurth Lake Creek Buffalo Houston County 21 Lake Mills ¤£84 Lake 7 103 C o Lake Sabine San Angelo l o r a d o Gatesville R Goldthwaite Limestone ¤£79 Houston Lufkin Å83 Goodfellow AFB i 147 94 v Crockett e Sam r Rayburn Coryell ¤£77 Marlin Reservoir Tom Green ¤£87 Leon 7 Angelina 69 ¤£283 ¤£377 Centerville 19 ¤£ 7 Concho Twin Oak Diboll 16 ¤£183 Falls 14 Reservoir Fort Hood 36 McCulloch Lake N Eden ¤£190 e c 87 Lampasas Belton Trinity h e 63 Camp Creek s 320 T R ¤£87 San Saba Lake £59 i r i n ¤ v e 96 San Saba i Groveton r ¤£ Copperas Cove Killeen 317 t Brady Creek Brady Temple y 63 Harker Heights Reservoir Robertson 94 Lampasas Belton R Jasper 53 £190 ¤ Franklin i £83 Trinity ¤ 71 195 Bell Madison v Stillhouse Madisonville e 6 Newton Hollow r £287 ¤ B.A. Steinhagen Lake Å356 Salado ¤£281 95 21 90 ¤£190 Lake 45 Lake Menard 1,3,5, Hearne ¨¦§ Holland Livingston £190 Cameron 190 Polk Tyler Newton ¤ Woodville 190 ¤£ ¤£ Menard 29 Walker 19 Jasper Milam 79 Burnet Little River ¤£ Lake 7,9,11 Bartlett Reservoir Huntsville ¤£190 Livingston Buchanan Llano Burnet Williamson Mason Bryan 30 Inks Lake 195 2,4,6, Brazos 29 Utilities 156 Lake Bryan Gibbons Mason £183 Creek ¤ Lake Lake Rockdale 30 Llano Kingsland Georgetown Granger Reservoir 75 ¤£377 Georgetown 29 San Jacinto 87 Alcoa 8,10,12 ¤£ 21 Lake Lake Lake 150 146 Lyndon B. Taylor 79 Leander ¤£ 150 Sheperd Marble College Johnson Marble Falls Grimes Falls Hutto Caldwell Station ¤£69 Anderson Kimble Cedar Park £96 Round Rock Burleson ¤£59 ¤£287 ¤ Willis 90 Silsbee Junction Lake Kountze Evadale 62 87 Travis Å787 327 Navasota 105 16 Hardin ¨¦§10 Conroe Cleveland ¤£77 Somerville Gillespie Lumberton ¤£290 71 105 Blanco Lake Somerville 6 S Lake Austin Montgomery Lake Lee 321 95 a 12 To w n Austin Walter E Long 105 n 242 290 Lake £ Camp Swift ¤ Johnson City Travis T Vidor Sour Lake Fredericksburg 45 J Liberty O ¨¦§ New Caney r AUSTIN- Washington a Orange Oak Hill BERGSTROM Giddings c 290 Brenham i INTERNATIONAL 71 Lake 21 ¤£ i Port of Beaumont £290 AIRPORT n ¤ Bastrop n Spring Beaumont t i 41 Hempstead Prairie View Liberty o Dayton Bridge City Bastrop t 27 Port Neches 83 e 90 ¤£ R i v r y ¤£ Blanco Buda 304 Waller 249 Humble 237 R Port Kerr HOUSTON 41 87 55 ¤£ Hays INTER- i Arthur Bastrop Smithville CONTINENTAL v Jefferson AIRPORT Kerrville Waller Sabine 146 e Kyle 159 B Rocksprings Cedar Creek Lake 377 281 £290 r Lake ¤£ ¤£ Bellville ¤ Houston Reservoir Austin r Harris ¤£59 71 a 73 27 21 Mont Belvieu 10 Canyon § z ¨¦ 16 Kendall La Grange 36 Lake San Marcos Fayette o 142 Lockhart Addicks 10 ¨¦§ s Anahuac Brookshire Reservoir Baytown Houston 124 M Sealy R 80 Caldwell 87 Comal Hunter Port of Houston Chambers Boerne i Edwards Real e 95 46 Barker d v Bellaire Reservoir Pasadena i 10 n 123 ¨¦§ e La Porte a r 610 R i v Schulenburg Weimar ¨¦§ Bandera e Leakey r New Braunfels £90 Columbus ¤ Missouri City Ellington Bandera Luling Sugar Land Camp Bullis Flatonia AFB Richmond Pearland 146 Colorado Eagle Lake 35 Lake 46 ¨¦§ Rosenberg Fresno 16 Mcqueeney 77 Friendswood A ¤£ Eagle League City 60 L Medina Helotes 90A U 80 183 £90 S Lake ¤ £ £ Smithers Bexar ¤ 304 ¤ N Å78 Galveston I Lake ¤£90A90 N Lake E 45 SAN ANTONIO Seguin P Randolph ¨¦§ Bay INTERNATIONAL Gonzales 6 R AIRPORT AFB A Lake ¤£59 V ¤£90A90 Galveston I Fort Sam 10 Guadalupe Gonzales Fort Bend Alvin L ¨¦§ 288 O Houston Shiner B San Antonio 97 Hallettsville 71 Texas City 36 Å521 Gonzales Lavaca 83 ¤£ 127 Medina LacklandKell 95 AFB USA ¤£77A77 Wharton
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Port of Beaumont
    Port of Beaumont Located in Beaumont, Texas, the Port of Beaumont is accessible from the Gulf of Mexico and Intracoastal Waterway via the federally maintained Sabine-Neches Ship Channel. The fifth largest port in the nation in terms of tonnage and the largest commercial military outload port in the United States, the Port of Beaumont specializes in LEGEND breakbulk, liquid bulk, dry bulk, heavy lift, roll-on/roll- BNSF LEGEND UP/SP Trackage Rights Handling Carrier BNSF off (Ro-Ro), bulk grain and project cargoes. In 2018, Haulage Agreement UP/SP Trackage Rights the port handled more than 4.6 million tons of cargo Handling Carrier Port of Haulage Agreement Beaumont from 30 countries on five continents. TERMINAL CAPABILITIES • Harbor: One • Facilities: • Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) #115 • Berths: Eight • 24-hour security and protection • Cranes: • Warehouse and transloading • Harbor mobile crane - 140 metric ton (308,647 lbs.) capacity with extension of 168 ft. • 550,000+ sq. ft. covered storage • A variety of lift machines and mobile cranes • 109,000 sq. ft. warehouse space • Over 90 acres of open storage adjacent to • Depth: 36 ft. - 40 ft. waterfront property • Rail-Served: Single commodity (unit) and mixed freight (manifest) capable • Four railcar unloading systems • Cargo Handled: Agricultural Breakbulk Bulk Heavy Lift Project Cargo Ro-Ro Products (Roll-on/Roll-off) Aaron Matthews, Sales Manager BNSF Railway [email protected] Office: 817-304-8516 Port of Beaumont TERMINAL CAPABILITIES OVERVIEW HARBOR ISLAND MARINE TERMINAL • Depth: 40 ft. • Berth: 1,438 ft. • Facilities: • Transit shed capacity total- 245,000 sq. ft. • Open storage area– 30+ acres • Weather-protected rail loading/unloading within transit sheds • Twin marginal rail tracks extend the full length of the wharf MAIN STREET TERMINAL 1 • Facilities: • Approx.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION
    2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS STIP Self-Certification ....................................................................................................................... Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... Transportation Planning Process – Overview ................................................................................. Transportation Conformity Process ................................................................................................. Transportation Plans, Programs, and the NEPA Process ............................................................... Importance of Consistency in Plans and Programs ........................................................................ STIP Content……………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………….. TIP/STIP Page Information ............................................................................................................... STIP Funding ..................................................................................................................................... STIP Financial Plan ........................................................................................................................... Public Involvement ......................................................................................... …………………………….. Acronyms/Glossary ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Technical Memorandum
    APPENDIX B TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN Texas Transportation Plan Tech Memo 1: Plan Assessment and Framework October 10, 2013 Acknowledgements PREPARED FOR: Michelle Conkle PREPARED BY: Michelle Maggiore, Alyson Welsh-Reaves QUALITY REVIEWERS: Steve Dilts Contents . 1.0 Introduction page 3 . 2.0 Plan Assessment page 3 – 2.1 Ongoing TxDOT Initiatives and Implications for the TTP page 3 – 2.2 TxDOT Plans for TTP Coordination page 4 – 2.3 Potential Challenges for the Texas Transportation System page 6 – 2.4 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Legislative Requirements page 7 . 3.0 Plan Framework page 9 – 3.1 Goals and Objectives page 9 – 3.2 Performance Measures page 12 – 3.3 Project Selection and Resource Allocation page 16 – 3.4 Performance Data Collection, Monitoring, and Reporting page 17 . 4.0 Plan Outreach page 19 – 4.1 Plan Outreach Requirements page 19 – 4.2 Texas Transportation Plan Outreach page 20 . 5.0 Plan Communication/Data Presentation page 20 – 5.1 Best Practices in Plan Communication/ Data Presentation page 20 – 5.2 Texas Transportation Plan Communication/ Data Presentation page 22 . 6.0 Recommended Plan Framework page 22 Exhibits . Exhibit 1: TxDOT Mission, Values, and Goals as defined in the 2013-2017 Strategic Plan . Exhibit 2: TxDOT Plans for Coordination with TTP (Source: 2035 SLRTP) . Exhibit 3: DRAFT TTP Goal and Objective “Building Blocks” . Exhibit 4: TTP Goal and Objective Development Process . Exhibit 5: U.S. DOT Guidance on MAP-21 Performance Rulemaking . Exhibit 6: TxDOT Performance Measures Recommended for National Use and AASHTO SCOPM Recommendations for National Performance Measures . Exhibit 7: Common State DOT Data Systems .
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Ports and Courts Update
    Texas Ports and Courts Update March 2021 1. COVID-19 Ports Update We have collected and summarized these items to In response to decreasing COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations, the help keep you apprised of the latest news and Governor of Texas recently rescinded statewide public occupancy developments from the ports and courts on the restrictions and mask mandates. Businesses are free to enforce their Texas coast. own restrictions, and many have kept their previous requirements in place. Texas port/terminal facilities nearly uniformly continue to require the same preventative measures (e.g., masks, temperature checks, physical distancing, etc.) despite the Governor’s recent announcement. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Coast Guard, and many vessel agents continue to board vessels and conduct activities in person. Vessels still need to advise CBP and Coast Guard boarding teams of any In this Update: crew illnesses prior to embarkation. Vessels are also required to notify the Coast Guard Captain of the Port of any crewmember showing symptoms consistent with COVID-19. 1. COVID-19 Ports Update Rapid COVID-19 testing is generally available, and test administrations can be scheduled and completed in relatively short timeframes. 2. Recent Port Activity & Shore leave remains allowed. Crew changes/repatriation requests are Development Projects permitted on a case-by-case basis. Off-signing crewmembers are generally required to proceed directly to 3. News from the Courts the airport for their flights, and overnight hotel stays are typically not permitted. CBP is generally requiring the following items in relation to a crewmember’s repatriation requests: (1) passport bio page; (2) C1/D visa; (3) I-95 landing permit; and (4) e-tickets with direct flights departing the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Texas & Southwest Louisiana
    AUGUST - OCTOBER 2012 SOUTHEAST TEXAS & SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA Celebration Park • Groves, TX Lamar FootballBeaumont, Team • Lamar TX University Fire Museum of Texas, Downtown Beaumont Rainbow Bridge • Bridge City, TX Wesley United Methodist • Fall Pumpkin Patch Texas Star Texas Visitor Center Beaumont, TX Orange, TX Lamar Dance Team • Lamar University Beaumont, TX DOGTOBER Beaumont,FEST • Crockettt TX Street Windmill Museum Nederland, TX Viva Spotlight Marvin Atwood: Viva Vino!: Tall Tales & Short Trips: The man behind Starvin Marvin's Texas Wines The Alamo on the Gulf Coast Jim King’s Cruisin’ SETX: Plenty to do and see Loaded With Maps, Activities, Shopping & Dining In SE Texas & SW Louisiana AUGUST - OCTOBER 2012 elcome to the first edition of Viva Southeast Texas magazine, the Wmagazine dedicated to providing valuable information about our area and its surrounding neighbors. We are a local quarterly magazine published and Wednesdays distributed throughout the Southeast Karaoke Texas and Southwest Louisiana region. Viva Southeast Texas will help you “Find Your Away Around” with colorful maps, a restaurant guide, useful lists of History things to see and do, and ideas for where to shop. We will Southeast Texas...Our Origins and Roots ............................ 4 introduce you to some of the most interesting local people ON 9TH Thursdays in our “Viva Spotlight” section, and take you back in time Places of Interest with folklore and history with “Tall Tales and Short Trips.” “Buck-off” any beer Shangri-La By Cindy Yohe Lindsey........................................................... 8 If it’s entertainment and local night life you want, Listings.................................................................................................10 Viva Southeast Texas will supply you with all the latest and any burger! information from Jim “King of the Road” and our calendar Maps of events.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Highway Projects Description
    MARINE HIGHWAY PROJECTS DESCRIPTION American Samoa Inter-Island Waterways Services Applicant: Pago Pago, Port of ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Baton Rouge – New Orleans Shuttle Service Applicant: New Orleans, Port of ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Bridgeport to Jefferson Port Ferry Service Applicant: Connecticut Port Authority ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Cape May – Lewes Ferry Applicant: Delaware River and Bay Authority .................................................................................................................................... 7 Chambers County – Houston Container on Barge Expansion Service Applicant: Chambers County ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Cross Gulf Container Expansion Project Applicant: Brownsville, Port and Manatee, Port ................................................................................................................................ 9 Cross Sound Ferry Enhancement Project Applicant: I-95 Corridor Coalition ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Vessel in Foreign Trade Entrances
    Filing Last Port Call Sign Foreign Trade Official Voyage Vessel Type Dock Code Filing Port Name Manifest Number Filing Date Last Domestic Port Vessel Name Last Foreign Port Number IMO Number Country Code Number Number Vessel Flag Code Agent Name PAX Total Crew Operator Name Draft Tonnage Owner Name Dock Name InTrans 3801 DETROIT, MI 3801-2021-00374 8/13/2021 - ALGOMA NIAGARA PORT COLBORNE, ONT CFFO 9619270 CA 2 840674 30 CA 330 WORLD SHIPPING INC 0 19 ALGOMA CENTRAL CORP. 23'0" 8979 ALGOMA CENTRAL CORP. ST. MARYS CEMENT CO., DETROIT PLANT WHARF D 5301 HOUSTON, TX 5301-2021-05471 8/13/2021 - IONIC STORM PUERTO QUETZAL V7BQ9 9332963 GT 1 5190 71 MH 229 Southport Agencies 0 20 IONIC SHIPPING (MGT) INC 32'0" 18504 SCOTIA PROJECTS LTD CITY DOCK NOS. 41 - 46 L 3002 TACOMA, WA 3002-2021-00775 8/13/2021 - HYUNDAI BRAVE VANCOUVER, BC V7EY4. 9346304 CA 3 7477 95 MH 310 HYUNDAI AMERICA SHIPPING AGENCY 0 25 HMM OCEAN SERVICE CO. LTD 38'5" 51638 SHIP OWNER INVESTMENT CO NO 7 S.A. WASHINGTON UNITED TERMINALS, TACOMA WHARF (WUT) DFL 5301 HOUSTON, TX 5301-2021-05472 8/13/2021 - NAVIGATOR EUROPA DAESAN D5FZ3 9661807 KR 2 16397 2102 LR 150 Fillette Green Shipping 0 20 NAVIGATOR EUROPA LLC 36'5" 5163 NAVIGATO EUROPA LLC BAYPORT RO RO TERMINAL D 1816 PORT CANAVERAL, FL 1816-2021-00412 8/13/2021 - DISNEY DREAM CASTAWAY CAY C6YR6 9434254 BS 1 8001800 1081 BS 350 Disney Cruise Lines 1348 1230 MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY LIMITED 28'2" 104345 MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY LIMITED CT8 DISNEY CRUISE TERMINAL 8 N 3001 SEATTLE, WA 3001-2021-01615 8/13/2021 SKAGWAY, AK CELEBRITY MILLENNIUM - 9HJF9 9189419 - 4 9189419 56800 MT 350 INTERCRUISES SHORESIDE & PORT SERVICES 1142 744 CELEBRITY CRUISES INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Lone Star State Ports Setting Records, Enhancing Diverse Cargo Infrastructure
    Lone Star State ports setting records, enhancing diverse cargo infrastructure by Paul Scott Abbott 5 hours ago | Published in Issue 704 Page 1: Port Houston Page 2: Port of Port Arthur Page 3: Port of Beaumont Page 4: Port of Galveston Page 5: Port Freeport Page 6: Calhoun Port Authority Page 7: Port of Corpus Christi Page 8: Port of Brownsville With record cargo volumes seemingly becoming commonplace, ports throughout Texas are assertively forging ahead with a multitude of infrastructure enhancements to handle even more activity in the future. Recent developments include not only expansions of on-terminal capabilities but also, in a number of cases, the advancement of deeper, wider ship channels. Beginning with Port Houston, the longtime No. 1 U.S. foreign tonnage port, then heading east to the Sabine-Neches Waterway facilities of Port Arthur and Beaumont before taking a southwestward jaunt along the Texas Gulf Coast to just north of the Mexico border, here’s the latest going on at key ports of the Lone Star State: Port Houston Marking a fourth consecutive year of double-digit growth in containerized cargo volume, Port Houston handled a record 2,987,291 twenty-foot-equivalent units in 2019 while adding three new container services and two general cargo liner services. Loaded container exports, buoyed by shipments of polyethylene resins, led the way with a 17 percent year-over-year increase. Overall tonnage moving through Port Houston public facilities also reached an all-time high last year, rising 5 percent over the preceding 12-month period, to 37.8 million tons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate Interim Committee on Natural Resources
    The Senate Interim Committee on Natural Resources Interim Report to the 77th Legislature The Economic Impact of Port Regionalization and Expansion November 2000 Senate Interim Committee on Natural Resources Report to the 77th Legislature The Economic Impact of Port Regionalization and Expansion TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION .............................................. 5 INTERIM CHARGE .............................................. 5 BACKGROUND ................................................. 7 History of Texas Ports and Their Role in Commerce .................. 7 Brief Overview of Ports in the Lone Star State ...................... 9 History of Ocean Shipping in Texas ............................. 12 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway .............................. 16 Role of the Federal Government ............................... 19 Comparison of Other Ports Nationwide .......................... 22 Senate Bill 1665: Port of Houston’s Acquisition of the Port of Galveston .. 23 ECONOMIC IMPACT ............................................ 24 Economic Impact of Texas Ports ............................... 25 Economic Impact of Ports Along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway ... 26 Economic Impact of U.S. Ports ................................ 26 Economic Importance of Waterways ............................ 27 GROWTH AND REGIONALIZATION TRENDS .......................... 27 Megaships and Megaports: An Emerging Trend in Shipping ........... 28 Transitioning to Megaships .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Key Information for Customers
    Updated July 6, 2020 KEY INFORMATION FOR CUSTOMERS Legal Port Name: Port of Beaumont Navigation District of Jefferson County, Texas Entity Type: Political Subdivision of the State of Texas (local government) Type of Port: Hybrid (operational and landlord) Deep Draft Physical Address: 1225 Main Street, Beaumont, Texas 77701 Phone Number: 409-835-5367 Fax: 409-835-0512 Website: portofbeaumont.com Foreign Trade Zone #: 115 (POB is manager of Foreign Trade Zone of Southeast Texas) Depth (Authorized/Current): 48/40 SNWW Width (Authorized): 400 Feet CARGO Annual tonnage FY 18/19: 6,583,012 tons Imports: Forest products (eucalyptus pulp), aggregate, military cargo, project cargo, iron and steel and other metal articles, wind energy Exports: Bulk grain, military cargo, iron and steel, vehicles, crude oil, diesel, gasoline, bagged goods, rice INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION Annual Truck Traffic: 124,152 trucks Annual Railcars: 14,134 railcars Number of Trains: Unit trains- 135 (not including other manifest movements) WATERWAY Name of Waterway: Sabine-Neches Waterway (SNW) Name of Channel: Port of Beaumont Channel- 19 miles long (from the Rainbow Bridge up) POB Channel Tonnage: 100.2 million tons POB Public Tonnage: 6.5 million tons Ranking: No. 4 Distance to GIWW: 18.5 miles Distance to Gulf: 42 miles Air Draft Rainbow Bridge: 177 ft Veterans Memorial Bridge: 143 ft MLK Bridge: 136 ft 1 PORT FACILITIES Turning Basin: 1,100 ft. diameter Terminals: Eight - Harbor Island Terminal - Main Street Terminal 1 - Main Street Terminal 2 - Carroll Street Terminal - Dry Bulk Terminal - Bulk Grain Terminal - Island Park Terminal - Orange County Liquid Bulk Terminal Berths: 12 current 1 under construction Total Berth Space: 8,766 linear feet Covered Storage: 574,710 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT SUMMARIES Port Authority Advisory Committee
    Port Authority Advisory Committee TEXAS PORTS 2017 – 2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARIES Port Authority Advisory Committee Port of s Orange Port of Beaumont a Port of Cedar Bayou Port Arthur Port of Navigation District x Houston Te Port of Texas City Port of Galveston Port of Freeport Port of Bay City Calhoun Port Authority Victoria County Port of Navigation District Palacios Port of West Calhoun Aransas County Navigation District ico Port of x Corpus Christi e M f o Port Mansfield f l Port of Harlingen Port of Port Isabel u Port of Brownsville G TEXAS PORTS 2017 – 2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM Page 1 Port Authority Advisory Committee LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN s chairman of the Port Authority Advisory Committee (PAAC), I am pleased to Apresent the Texas Ports 2017–2018 Capital Program. Texas has the most robust maritime system in the United States. In 2015, Texas was ranked first in the nation in total foreign imports and exports and second in the nation for total tonnage. The state’s maritime system continues to be a critical gateway to international trade and provides the residents of the state with a multitude of economic opportunities through the movement of waterborne commerce and trade. In 2015, the Texas Ports Association conducted an economic study focused on defining the value of Texas ports to the state and the nation. Maritime activity at Texas ports: • Moved over 563 million tons of cargo including 350 million tons of international tonnage and nearly 200 million tons of domestic cargo • Handled over 1.8 million containers • Served over 1.6 million cruise passengers • Supported over 1.5 million jobs in the state • Provided over $368 billion in total economic value to the state, 23% of the overall state GDP • Generated over $92 billion in personal income and local consumption of goods • Generated $6.9 billion of state and local taxes Texas ports are critical economic engines for their communities and the state.
    [Show full text]
  • MARINE TERMINAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PORT of HOUSTON and HAPAG-LLOVD"A.G
    MARINE TERMINAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PORT OF HOUSTON and HAPAG-LLOVD"A.G FEDERAL MARITIME AGREEMENT NUMBER: 201177 APPROVAL DATE: EXPIRATION DATE: TEN YEARS AFTER APPROVAL; OPTION TO RENEW FOR FIVE YEARS 'JAN 1 8 2008 c::~ (al .0 0- UNDER THE e:;; % SHIPf'j~IG ACT ,:{?! ~4t OF 1984 .<':' qritime C~/ MARINE TERMINAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY AND HAPAG-LLOYD AC TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Term 1 2. Applicability ofTariffs I 3. Throughput and Empty Handling Charges 2 4. Preferential Berthing 5 5. Empty Container Yard 7 6. Cargo Commitment 8 7. Applicability of Agreement 9 8. Events of Default 9 9. Remedies on Event ofDefault 10 10. Payments by Carrier 10 II. Filing II 12. Force Majeure II 13. Assignments II 14. StowawaysfUnauthorized Access to Vessels 12 15. Subordination of Liens 12 16. Notices 12 17. General Provisions 12 FMC Agreement No. 201177 MARINE TERMINAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY AND HAPAG-LLOYD AG This Marine Telminal Services Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into as of the date last set forth beneath the parties' signatures below (the "Effective Date"), by and between the Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas, a governmental subdivision of the State ofTexas ("PHA"), and Hapag-L1oyd AG, a German stock corporation (the "Canier") with reference to the following: A. PHA owns and operates Fentress Bracewell Barbours Cut Container Terminal ("Barbours Cut Terminal"), and Bayport Container Temlinal ("Bayport Terminal"), and in connection therewith is a Marine Terminal Operator, as provided for in the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 App. U.S.c.
    [Show full text]