San Angelo Abilene Austin Tyler Waco Bryan Lufkin Paris Childress

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

San Angelo Abilene Austin Tyler Waco Bryan Lufkin Paris Childress S a b i n e Toledo Bend Reservoir TTeexxtt S a b i n e A R K A N S A S Lawton Existing Texas Transportation System - North Region Sulphur Childress DuncaTn exas Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan 2035 Glenwood Baylor ¤£62 Meridian Lake Childress Atoka Springer «¬285 Quanah ¤£283 Antlers Childress Healdton I n HardemaLanke d i Dickson a Murfreesboro Pauline n Lone Grove N a t i Waurika o Ardmore n De Queen Vernon T o 488 l l «¬ R 145 o «¬ a Burkburnett d 240 Hugo «¬ «¬267 Electra Durant Cottle Wilbarger Wichita North Fork 44 v e r Idabel Paducah Crowell ¤£287 Buffalo Creek ¨¦§ «¬79 R i ¤£70 Lake Reservoir o Electra 325 d Ben Lomond Santa Rosa «¬ Lake e Foard Lake «¬148 Texoma R Pat Mayse Lake 183 Wichita Falls¤£277 Lake ¤£ Nocona «¬473 «¬47 «¬258 £271 Henrietta «¬19 Caddo ¤ «¬37 Lake Nocona Hubert H. Moss National Grasslands Lake Lake Wichita 510 Pottsboro Ashdown Truscott Brine Lake «¬25 «¬ Lake Coffee Mill Crook Diversion Denison Lake Kemp «¬91 Lake 175 Paris Clay «¬ Lake Lamar Detroit Grayson Bonham Clarksville Montague Cooke Valley «¬286 Lake Lake Gainesville 129 «¬ Lake Kickapoo Wichita Falls Montague 82 121 Arrowhead ¤£ Sherman «¬56 ¬ «Bonham «¬56 Baylor Red River De Kalb Guthrie Knox Archer City Lake «¬311 «¬391 King Benjamin Kiowa Leary Seymour «¬11 «¬86 Archer £377 Hooks T71exarkana Lake Bowie ¤ Fannin Paris Bogata New Boston o¤£o Davis «¬8 59 381 «¬93 148 «¬ «¬ «¬6 «¬ Lake 37 River Crest Lewisville Caddo «¬ 151 Ray Lake u i v e «¬ 35 160 National Grasslands S u l p h r R r BowRieedwater Lake ¨¦§ Roberts «¬ Cooper City/ Amon G. Carter 511 Big Creek Delta «¬98 187 «¬ 121 «¬96 «¬222 Millers Creek Lake «¬ «¬5 «¬ Cooper Maud Reservoir Olney «¬79 Pilot Point 101 Lyndon B. Johnson «¬ 50 National Grassland «¬ Wright Patman Olney Lake «¬114 ¤£81 «¬24 132 Denton ¤£75 «¬ Franklin Naples Commerce Titus «¬77 Douglassville 251 «¬16 178 ¤£67 «¬ 289 «¬ Mount Vernon Marietta «¬8 Queen City Jack Decatur «¬ Hunt Lake Hopkins Omaha Bloomburg Haskell £380 MCcKolilninney Sulphur Springs «¬423 185 M«¬134ount Pleasant ¤ 359 «¬ Atlanta Bradley Jacksboro Lake Bridgeport Denton «¬ 154 Lake «¬ Cass «¬77 Young Bridgeport Greenville ¬49 302 Sulphur Springs Cypress « Morris Throckmorton Wise 33 «¬ 30 ¤£380 «¬ ¨¦§ ¤£67 «¬11 Springs Haskell Lake «¬444 Lake Allen Daingerfield StonewaAll spermont Graham Lewisville 128 Throckmorton «¬78 ¬ 114 Hughes Springs « «¬ C y Linden 121 271 Lake Graham «¬ Lake ¤£ p Lewisville r Stamford Rhome Lavon e «¬283 Pittsburg s Plano s 114 C «¬ Lake 190 Black Bayou Camp r e Grapevine «¬ «¬19 e 377 «¬66 Lake Lone Sta rk 533 Fort Worth ¤£ Lake 154 Avinger «¬ Springtown Eagle CoppCellarrolRltiocnhardson 161 «¬ Winnsboro Vivian 199 RaRy ockwall «¬ «¬ Mountain North «¬34 «¬37 ¬16 Keller Hubbard Lake ¬155 Johnson Creek « Lake Garland 276 « Reservoir 254 Lake 635 276 «¬ Possum «¬ «¬ 264 Emory Lake Fork Quitman Stamford 67 337 Fort «¬26 DALLAS/ ¨¦§ 205 «¬ Marion «¬43 «¬ Kingdom «¬ Wolters FORT WORTH 354 «¬ Rains Reservoir INTERNATIONAL Ore City «¬92 283 Lake o «¬ 12 244 ¤£ Watauga AIRPORT W«¬hite «¬ Upshur Lake O' The Pines Caddo Rock Quitman «¬J49efferson Hamlin Fort Worth «¬97 183 Lake Lake 820 «¬ o Lake Rockwall 182 173 474 Hurst Irving Tawakoni «¬ «¬ Lake Gilmer ¨¦§ «¬ Mesquite New Terrell Uncertain 345 Gilmer Caddo Lake Parker Lake City Lake Lake «¬183 § Wood Benton Worth ¨¦ MineralWeatherford Grand Prairie 352 BalchForney Terrell 154 Palo Pinto Weatherford «¬ Lake «¬ Carswell 347 Arlington «¬180 Dallas«¬87 «¬449 Breckenridge AFB «¬ Springs Wills Point Grand SaliHnolbreook Anson 180 Palo Pinto Wells 312 Mountain ¬557 Shackelford Hubbard ¤£ «¬ 580 360 « Mineola Lake ¬ o 310 Lake 155 «¬ 303 « Creek Roby Creek White «¬ «¬ Hawkins «¬ Atlanta Albany «¬252 Benbrook Arlington Lake ¤£69 ¤£80 300 Fisher Jones Reservoir Forest Hill «¬ Nesbitt 220 Stephens Settlement «¬465 Joe 35 Crandall Lake «¬390 ¨¦§ 35 Pool Duncanvil¨¦§le Gladewater 183 Lake Lake Kaufman Harrison Scottsville Cross § Lake ¨¦ Lake ¤£ Palo Pinto Lake Lake Benbrook Cedar HDeil lSoLtoancaster Dallas Gladewater«¬281 Hallsville Marshall Fort Phantom Hill Daniel Tarrant Mansfield Kaufman 243 Canton Waskom 342 «¬ Van «¬ Lindale 502 ¤£80 Shreveport Abilene «¬110 «¬155 L«¬ongview ¨¦§20 351 108 «¬5B0 urleson Dallas Van Zandt Gregg «¬31 «¬ «¬ 193 322 «¬ «¬42 «¬ ¬6 Lake 561 S a b « 281 «¬ «¬64 Lakeport i n e ¤£ Granbury «¬73 R 174 Smith Winona i v «¬ Kilgore Easton e MerkelAbilene 254 287 101 Lake r Granbury £ Cherokee ¬112 Range«¬r ¤ «¬ o Lake « Tyler Lake Keene 198 147 Tatum Cisco «¬16 171 «¬ «¬ Stonewall Sweetwater Dyess Air Force Base Eastland «¬ Waxahachie «¬31 322 Baird 102 o 155 «¬ Cisco ¬ 469 248 259 322 Hood « «¬ 164 «¬ «¬ ¤£ «¬ ¤£79 o ¬490 «¬334 «¬ «¬323 Lake « Ennis Lake Beckville 108 Cleburne 437 Cedar Overton Martin Kirby ¬ «¬ Tyler Lake Lake Lake « Squaw Johnson Ellis «¬274 Creek New London Clyde Leon Creek Lake «¬49 135 42 Lake Bardwell Reservoir Lake «¬ «¬ L O U I S I A N A Reservoir Palestine «¬323 Nolan Callahan Eastland Pat Cleburne Lake Tyler «¬149 Taylor Forest Grove«¬7 Lake East Glen Rose ¬34 «¬64 Rusk Erath « Reservoir Athens «¬571 Carthage 277 Bullard Henderson ¤£ Lake Stephenville Athens Troup Panola Abilene Somervell 60 ¬6 Henderson «¬ 110 315 « Kerens Trinidad «¬ «¬ Lake «¬81 Tyler Murvaul Gary Corsicana Lake «¬135 «¬36 DeLeon Lake 175 «¬22 ¤£ Logansport North Halbert Joaquin «¬206 Navarro Richland- 84 «¬220 144 Chambers Tenaha ¤£ «¬ Lake 53795 Oak «¬¨¦§ Reservoir «¬19 Lake 157 Creek Whitney Hillsboro 294 Jacksonville Striker «¬ Proctor Navarro Mills «¬ 456 Reservoir Lake 287 «¬ 259 Lake Lake ¤£ Lake ¤£ Timpson Coleman Jacksonville Hill 142 Lake Hico Whitney «¬ Huxley WintersWinters Comanche Meridian Aquilla 279 204 Center «¬ Lake «¬263 «¬262 «¬ Garrison Lake Cherokee 500 «¬87 Comanche 324 Anderson Shelby «¬ Brownwood «¬ 62 Robert E. Lee Bosque 171 «¬Rusk «¬ Fairfield Hords Creek 130 Palestine «¬ Lake 155 Lake Coleman «¬ Pinkston Runnels Reservoir 153 «¬16 «¬ Clifton Fairfield NacogdocheAsppleby Coleman Brown «¬442 Alto 147 Lake Lake «¬ Toledo Hamilton 113 224 Ballinger Ballinger «¬ 294 Nacogdoches «¬ Bend Mexia Freestone «¬ 294 «¬21 Lake «¬ Reservoir Brownwood Waco Mexia Teague Nacogdoches San Augustine Hamilton McLennan «¬179 «¬85 «¬21 «¬36 Tradinghouse ¤£287 Chireno o 299 Creek Limestone Wells «¬35 ¬412 «¬Waco « Reservoir Mart San Augustine Lake «¬2 Groesbeck Lake «¬14 Grapeland Kurth Waco «¬6 147 Paint Rock Lake Creek «¬ Buffalo Houston County 103 Lake «¬ ¤£96 «¬184 ¤£79 Lake 103 C o Mills 15 Lake «¬ Lufkin Sabine San Angelo ¤£283 l o r a d o «¬ Gatesville 377 R Goldthwaite Limestone Hudson266 Goodfellow AFB ¤£ i v «¬ Broaddus e r 7 Huntington Pineland Crocket«¬t Sam 317 Coryell «¬ Rayburn Marlin 414 577 236 4755 Burke Reservoir ¬ Tom Green «¬ «¬ «¬7 Leon¨¦§«¬ «¬94 Angelina « Twin Oak 208 Centerville Diboll Zavalla Brownwood «¬ «¬165 Concho Falls Reservoir «¬210 Lufkin Browndell 190 Fort Hood Lake TxDOT North Region Eden McCulloch ¤£ N Belton 320 e c h «¬ Lovelady e s R Lampasas Camp Creek Trinity i v T e r 63 San Saba Lake «¬ r i n i t y «¬19 Groveton San Saba Copperas CKovielleen R Brady Creek Legend 290 Temple i Brady Harker Heights ¬ 265 v Reservoir « ¤£83 «¬ e «¬94 Corrigan Lampasas Belton Robertson r ¬201 363 Midway « «¬ «¬53 Franklin Interstate Route «¬63 o «¬121 ¨¦§ Jasper OSR Chester Colmesneil Bell «¬ Madison Trinity Moscow 190 Stillhouse ¤£ US Route ¤£ Hollow Madisonville Lake Salado «¬160 B.A. Steinhagen San Angelo ¤£190 «¬ StaStee vReno uOtaeks Lake ¬71 Menard « 195 Hearne Riverside Onalaska 308 «¬ Holland ¤£87 «¬ Cameron Polk TylerWoodville Newton 190 «¬16 Texas Trunk System ¤£ Menard «¬29 138 PEoint Blanak st Jasper «¬ Walker ¤£69 Burnet Bartlett Milam ¤£190 «¬361 Oakhurst Lake «¬59 Livingston Huntsville Railroad 190 261 Buchanan £190 «¬231 «¬30 ¤£ Llano «¬ Burnet Williamson ¤ Mason Bryan «¬156 Inks Lake Utilities Brazos Hurricane Evacuation Route 183 «¬95 ¤£ Lake Bryan «¬90 377 Gibbons «¬393 ¤£ Mason Lake Lake Creek Coldspring 332 158 Rockdale 308 Military Installation Llano Kingsland «¬ Georgetown «¬Georgetown «¬29 Granger «¬47 «¬ Reservoir B San Jacinto Alcoa r «¬26 a Lake Lake Lake z New Waverly Taylor o o Grimes MPO Lyndon B. 424 Marble Leander s «¬ Johnson Marble Falls 75 Falls Hutto College «¬ R Shepherd T r Caldwell i i 130 Anderson n v Anderson «¬ TxDOT Ri egion Kimble Cedar Park e t 146 Station y ¬ r « Beaumont Round Rock Burleson R 71 Willis i Kountze «¬ v 183 «¬45 Bryan e SilsbeeEvadale 291 Junction 191 Lake £ 277 TxDOT Dis r trict 327 «¬ 481 «¬ ¤ «¬ «¬36 Montgomery «¬ «¬ Travis North Cleveland £281 123 Navasota Hardin Austin ¤ «¬ ClevelandMajor River Somerville 234 ConCurto aend Shoot «¬275 «¬ Lumberton Gillespie ¬109 «¬212 « Lake/Reservoir Blanco «¬1 LSoamkme eSrvoilmle eLravkielle Lake Austin 105 Montgomery 326 10 Lake Lee «¬ Todd Mission Splendora «¬ ¨¦§ Town Walter E Long 223 Plum Grove 290 LakAe ustin «¬ 242 £ Camp Swift Magnolia «¬ o Commercial Airport ¤ Johnson City Travis ¬165 Patton Village Vidor Fredericksburg 343 « ShenandoWahoodbranch Village Hardin Sour Lake 105 «¬ ¬21 Liberty ¬ 10 o «¬95 « Dayton Lakes « 377 ¨¦§ AUSTIN- ¤£ 290 Oak Hill 186 290 Washington Grayburg Orange ¤£ BERGSTROM «¬ Giddings ¤£ Stage Coach Oak Ridge North Pipeline (Texas)Daisetta INTERNATIONAL «¬71 Lake Brenham Port of Beaumont 290 ¬45 275 AIRPORT Bastrop Kenefick ¤£ « «¬ o 494 «¬458 Hempstead «¬ Liberty China Beaumont Prairie View Tomball City/DTaoywtonn Devers Nome 83 Bastrop Spring «¬227 ¤£90 Port Neches ¤£ «¬150 Waller Houston Port Blanco Buda 237 497 «¬ «¬ Pine Island County «¬93 Kerr «¬163 «¬4 159 HOUSTON «¬41 «¬ INTER-
Recommended publications
  • Port of Beaumont
    Port of Beaumont Located in Beaumont, Texas, the Port of Beaumont is accessible from the Gulf of Mexico and Intracoastal Waterway via the federally maintained Sabine-Neches Ship Channel. The fifth largest port in the nation in terms of tonnage and the largest commercial military outload port in the United States, the Port of Beaumont specializes in LEGEND breakbulk, liquid bulk, dry bulk, heavy lift, roll-on/roll- BNSF LEGEND UP/SP Trackage Rights Handling Carrier BNSF off (Ro-Ro), bulk grain and project cargoes. In 2018, Haulage Agreement UP/SP Trackage Rights the port handled more than 4.6 million tons of cargo Handling Carrier Port of Haulage Agreement Beaumont from 30 countries on five continents. TERMINAL CAPABILITIES • Harbor: One • Facilities: • Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) #115 • Berths: Eight • 24-hour security and protection • Cranes: • Warehouse and transloading • Harbor mobile crane - 140 metric ton (308,647 lbs.) capacity with extension of 168 ft. • 550,000+ sq. ft. covered storage • A variety of lift machines and mobile cranes • 109,000 sq. ft. warehouse space • Over 90 acres of open storage adjacent to • Depth: 36 ft. - 40 ft. waterfront property • Rail-Served: Single commodity (unit) and mixed freight (manifest) capable • Four railcar unloading systems • Cargo Handled: Agricultural Breakbulk Bulk Heavy Lift Project Cargo Ro-Ro Products (Roll-on/Roll-off) Aaron Matthews, Sales Manager BNSF Railway [email protected] Office: 817-304-8516 Port of Beaumont TERMINAL CAPABILITIES OVERVIEW HARBOR ISLAND MARINE TERMINAL • Depth: 40 ft. • Berth: 1,438 ft. • Facilities: • Transit shed capacity total- 245,000 sq. ft. • Open storage area– 30+ acres • Weather-protected rail loading/unloading within transit sheds • Twin marginal rail tracks extend the full length of the wharf MAIN STREET TERMINAL 1 • Facilities: • Approx.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION
    2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS STIP Self-Certification ....................................................................................................................... Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... Transportation Planning Process – Overview ................................................................................. Transportation Conformity Process ................................................................................................. Transportation Plans, Programs, and the NEPA Process ............................................................... Importance of Consistency in Plans and Programs ........................................................................ STIP Content……………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………….. TIP/STIP Page Information ............................................................................................................... STIP Funding ..................................................................................................................................... STIP Financial Plan ........................................................................................................................... Public Involvement ......................................................................................... …………………………….. Acronyms/Glossary ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Technical Memorandum
    APPENDIX B TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN Texas Transportation Plan Tech Memo 1: Plan Assessment and Framework October 10, 2013 Acknowledgements PREPARED FOR: Michelle Conkle PREPARED BY: Michelle Maggiore, Alyson Welsh-Reaves QUALITY REVIEWERS: Steve Dilts Contents . 1.0 Introduction page 3 . 2.0 Plan Assessment page 3 – 2.1 Ongoing TxDOT Initiatives and Implications for the TTP page 3 – 2.2 TxDOT Plans for TTP Coordination page 4 – 2.3 Potential Challenges for the Texas Transportation System page 6 – 2.4 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Legislative Requirements page 7 . 3.0 Plan Framework page 9 – 3.1 Goals and Objectives page 9 – 3.2 Performance Measures page 12 – 3.3 Project Selection and Resource Allocation page 16 – 3.4 Performance Data Collection, Monitoring, and Reporting page 17 . 4.0 Plan Outreach page 19 – 4.1 Plan Outreach Requirements page 19 – 4.2 Texas Transportation Plan Outreach page 20 . 5.0 Plan Communication/Data Presentation page 20 – 5.1 Best Practices in Plan Communication/ Data Presentation page 20 – 5.2 Texas Transportation Plan Communication/ Data Presentation page 22 . 6.0 Recommended Plan Framework page 22 Exhibits . Exhibit 1: TxDOT Mission, Values, and Goals as defined in the 2013-2017 Strategic Plan . Exhibit 2: TxDOT Plans for Coordination with TTP (Source: 2035 SLRTP) . Exhibit 3: DRAFT TTP Goal and Objective “Building Blocks” . Exhibit 4: TTP Goal and Objective Development Process . Exhibit 5: U.S. DOT Guidance on MAP-21 Performance Rulemaking . Exhibit 6: TxDOT Performance Measures Recommended for National Use and AASHTO SCOPM Recommendations for National Performance Measures . Exhibit 7: Common State DOT Data Systems .
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Ports and Courts Update
    Texas Ports and Courts Update March 2021 1. COVID-19 Ports Update We have collected and summarized these items to In response to decreasing COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations, the help keep you apprised of the latest news and Governor of Texas recently rescinded statewide public occupancy developments from the ports and courts on the restrictions and mask mandates. Businesses are free to enforce their Texas coast. own restrictions, and many have kept their previous requirements in place. Texas port/terminal facilities nearly uniformly continue to require the same preventative measures (e.g., masks, temperature checks, physical distancing, etc.) despite the Governor’s recent announcement. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Coast Guard, and many vessel agents continue to board vessels and conduct activities in person. Vessels still need to advise CBP and Coast Guard boarding teams of any In this Update: crew illnesses prior to embarkation. Vessels are also required to notify the Coast Guard Captain of the Port of any crewmember showing symptoms consistent with COVID-19. 1. COVID-19 Ports Update Rapid COVID-19 testing is generally available, and test administrations can be scheduled and completed in relatively short timeframes. 2. Recent Port Activity & Shore leave remains allowed. Crew changes/repatriation requests are Development Projects permitted on a case-by-case basis. Off-signing crewmembers are generally required to proceed directly to 3. News from the Courts the airport for their flights, and overnight hotel stays are typically not permitted. CBP is generally requiring the following items in relation to a crewmember’s repatriation requests: (1) passport bio page; (2) C1/D visa; (3) I-95 landing permit; and (4) e-tickets with direct flights departing the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Texas & Southwest Louisiana
    AUGUST - OCTOBER 2012 SOUTHEAST TEXAS & SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA Celebration Park • Groves, TX Lamar FootballBeaumont, Team • Lamar TX University Fire Museum of Texas, Downtown Beaumont Rainbow Bridge • Bridge City, TX Wesley United Methodist • Fall Pumpkin Patch Texas Star Texas Visitor Center Beaumont, TX Orange, TX Lamar Dance Team • Lamar University Beaumont, TX DOGTOBER Beaumont,FEST • Crockettt TX Street Windmill Museum Nederland, TX Viva Spotlight Marvin Atwood: Viva Vino!: Tall Tales & Short Trips: The man behind Starvin Marvin's Texas Wines The Alamo on the Gulf Coast Jim King’s Cruisin’ SETX: Plenty to do and see Loaded With Maps, Activities, Shopping & Dining In SE Texas & SW Louisiana AUGUST - OCTOBER 2012 elcome to the first edition of Viva Southeast Texas magazine, the Wmagazine dedicated to providing valuable information about our area and its surrounding neighbors. We are a local quarterly magazine published and Wednesdays distributed throughout the Southeast Karaoke Texas and Southwest Louisiana region. Viva Southeast Texas will help you “Find Your Away Around” with colorful maps, a restaurant guide, useful lists of History things to see and do, and ideas for where to shop. We will Southeast Texas...Our Origins and Roots ............................ 4 introduce you to some of the most interesting local people ON 9TH Thursdays in our “Viva Spotlight” section, and take you back in time Places of Interest with folklore and history with “Tall Tales and Short Trips.” “Buck-off” any beer Shangri-La By Cindy Yohe Lindsey........................................................... 8 If it’s entertainment and local night life you want, Listings.................................................................................................10 Viva Southeast Texas will supply you with all the latest and any burger! information from Jim “King of the Road” and our calendar Maps of events.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Highway Projects Description
    MARINE HIGHWAY PROJECTS DESCRIPTION American Samoa Inter-Island Waterways Services Applicant: Pago Pago, Port of ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Baton Rouge – New Orleans Shuttle Service Applicant: New Orleans, Port of ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Bridgeport to Jefferson Port Ferry Service Applicant: Connecticut Port Authority ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Cape May – Lewes Ferry Applicant: Delaware River and Bay Authority .................................................................................................................................... 7 Chambers County – Houston Container on Barge Expansion Service Applicant: Chambers County ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Cross Gulf Container Expansion Project Applicant: Brownsville, Port and Manatee, Port ................................................................................................................................ 9 Cross Sound Ferry Enhancement Project Applicant: I-95 Corridor Coalition ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Vessel in Foreign Trade Entrances
    Filing Last Port Call Sign Foreign Trade Official Voyage Vessel Type Dock Code Filing Port Name Manifest Number Filing Date Last Domestic Port Vessel Name Last Foreign Port Number IMO Number Country Code Number Number Vessel Flag Code Agent Name PAX Total Crew Operator Name Draft Tonnage Owner Name Dock Name InTrans 3801 DETROIT, MI 3801-2021-00374 8/13/2021 - ALGOMA NIAGARA PORT COLBORNE, ONT CFFO 9619270 CA 2 840674 30 CA 330 WORLD SHIPPING INC 0 19 ALGOMA CENTRAL CORP. 23'0" 8979 ALGOMA CENTRAL CORP. ST. MARYS CEMENT CO., DETROIT PLANT WHARF D 5301 HOUSTON, TX 5301-2021-05471 8/13/2021 - IONIC STORM PUERTO QUETZAL V7BQ9 9332963 GT 1 5190 71 MH 229 Southport Agencies 0 20 IONIC SHIPPING (MGT) INC 32'0" 18504 SCOTIA PROJECTS LTD CITY DOCK NOS. 41 - 46 L 3002 TACOMA, WA 3002-2021-00775 8/13/2021 - HYUNDAI BRAVE VANCOUVER, BC V7EY4. 9346304 CA 3 7477 95 MH 310 HYUNDAI AMERICA SHIPPING AGENCY 0 25 HMM OCEAN SERVICE CO. LTD 38'5" 51638 SHIP OWNER INVESTMENT CO NO 7 S.A. WASHINGTON UNITED TERMINALS, TACOMA WHARF (WUT) DFL 5301 HOUSTON, TX 5301-2021-05472 8/13/2021 - NAVIGATOR EUROPA DAESAN D5FZ3 9661807 KR 2 16397 2102 LR 150 Fillette Green Shipping 0 20 NAVIGATOR EUROPA LLC 36'5" 5163 NAVIGATO EUROPA LLC BAYPORT RO RO TERMINAL D 1816 PORT CANAVERAL, FL 1816-2021-00412 8/13/2021 - DISNEY DREAM CASTAWAY CAY C6YR6 9434254 BS 1 8001800 1081 BS 350 Disney Cruise Lines 1348 1230 MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY LIMITED 28'2" 104345 MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY LIMITED CT8 DISNEY CRUISE TERMINAL 8 N 3001 SEATTLE, WA 3001-2021-01615 8/13/2021 SKAGWAY, AK CELEBRITY MILLENNIUM - 9HJF9 9189419 - 4 9189419 56800 MT 350 INTERCRUISES SHORESIDE & PORT SERVICES 1142 744 CELEBRITY CRUISES INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Lone Star State Ports Setting Records, Enhancing Diverse Cargo Infrastructure
    Lone Star State ports setting records, enhancing diverse cargo infrastructure by Paul Scott Abbott 5 hours ago | Published in Issue 704 Page 1: Port Houston Page 2: Port of Port Arthur Page 3: Port of Beaumont Page 4: Port of Galveston Page 5: Port Freeport Page 6: Calhoun Port Authority Page 7: Port of Corpus Christi Page 8: Port of Brownsville With record cargo volumes seemingly becoming commonplace, ports throughout Texas are assertively forging ahead with a multitude of infrastructure enhancements to handle even more activity in the future. Recent developments include not only expansions of on-terminal capabilities but also, in a number of cases, the advancement of deeper, wider ship channels. Beginning with Port Houston, the longtime No. 1 U.S. foreign tonnage port, then heading east to the Sabine-Neches Waterway facilities of Port Arthur and Beaumont before taking a southwestward jaunt along the Texas Gulf Coast to just north of the Mexico border, here’s the latest going on at key ports of the Lone Star State: Port Houston Marking a fourth consecutive year of double-digit growth in containerized cargo volume, Port Houston handled a record 2,987,291 twenty-foot-equivalent units in 2019 while adding three new container services and two general cargo liner services. Loaded container exports, buoyed by shipments of polyethylene resins, led the way with a 17 percent year-over-year increase. Overall tonnage moving through Port Houston public facilities also reached an all-time high last year, rising 5 percent over the preceding 12-month period, to 37.8 million tons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate Interim Committee on Natural Resources
    The Senate Interim Committee on Natural Resources Interim Report to the 77th Legislature The Economic Impact of Port Regionalization and Expansion November 2000 Senate Interim Committee on Natural Resources Report to the 77th Legislature The Economic Impact of Port Regionalization and Expansion TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION .............................................. 5 INTERIM CHARGE .............................................. 5 BACKGROUND ................................................. 7 History of Texas Ports and Their Role in Commerce .................. 7 Brief Overview of Ports in the Lone Star State ...................... 9 History of Ocean Shipping in Texas ............................. 12 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway .............................. 16 Role of the Federal Government ............................... 19 Comparison of Other Ports Nationwide .......................... 22 Senate Bill 1665: Port of Houston’s Acquisition of the Port of Galveston .. 23 ECONOMIC IMPACT ............................................ 24 Economic Impact of Texas Ports ............................... 25 Economic Impact of Ports Along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway ... 26 Economic Impact of U.S. Ports ................................ 26 Economic Importance of Waterways ............................ 27 GROWTH AND REGIONALIZATION TRENDS .......................... 27 Megaships and Megaports: An Emerging Trend in Shipping ........... 28 Transitioning to Megaships .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Key Information for Customers
    Updated July 6, 2020 KEY INFORMATION FOR CUSTOMERS Legal Port Name: Port of Beaumont Navigation District of Jefferson County, Texas Entity Type: Political Subdivision of the State of Texas (local government) Type of Port: Hybrid (operational and landlord) Deep Draft Physical Address: 1225 Main Street, Beaumont, Texas 77701 Phone Number: 409-835-5367 Fax: 409-835-0512 Website: portofbeaumont.com Foreign Trade Zone #: 115 (POB is manager of Foreign Trade Zone of Southeast Texas) Depth (Authorized/Current): 48/40 SNWW Width (Authorized): 400 Feet CARGO Annual tonnage FY 18/19: 6,583,012 tons Imports: Forest products (eucalyptus pulp), aggregate, military cargo, project cargo, iron and steel and other metal articles, wind energy Exports: Bulk grain, military cargo, iron and steel, vehicles, crude oil, diesel, gasoline, bagged goods, rice INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION Annual Truck Traffic: 124,152 trucks Annual Railcars: 14,134 railcars Number of Trains: Unit trains- 135 (not including other manifest movements) WATERWAY Name of Waterway: Sabine-Neches Waterway (SNW) Name of Channel: Port of Beaumont Channel- 19 miles long (from the Rainbow Bridge up) POB Channel Tonnage: 100.2 million tons POB Public Tonnage: 6.5 million tons Ranking: No. 4 Distance to GIWW: 18.5 miles Distance to Gulf: 42 miles Air Draft Rainbow Bridge: 177 ft Veterans Memorial Bridge: 143 ft MLK Bridge: 136 ft 1 PORT FACILITIES Turning Basin: 1,100 ft. diameter Terminals: Eight - Harbor Island Terminal - Main Street Terminal 1 - Main Street Terminal 2 - Carroll Street Terminal - Dry Bulk Terminal - Bulk Grain Terminal - Island Park Terminal - Orange County Liquid Bulk Terminal Berths: 12 current 1 under construction Total Berth Space: 8,766 linear feet Covered Storage: 574,710 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT SUMMARIES Port Authority Advisory Committee
    Port Authority Advisory Committee TEXAS PORTS 2017 – 2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARIES Port Authority Advisory Committee Port of s Orange Port of Beaumont a Port of Cedar Bayou Port Arthur Port of Navigation District x Houston Te Port of Texas City Port of Galveston Port of Freeport Port of Bay City Calhoun Port Authority Victoria County Port of Navigation District Palacios Port of West Calhoun Aransas County Navigation District ico Port of x Corpus Christi e M f o Port Mansfield f l Port of Harlingen Port of Port Isabel u Port of Brownsville G TEXAS PORTS 2017 – 2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM Page 1 Port Authority Advisory Committee LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN s chairman of the Port Authority Advisory Committee (PAAC), I am pleased to Apresent the Texas Ports 2017–2018 Capital Program. Texas has the most robust maritime system in the United States. In 2015, Texas was ranked first in the nation in total foreign imports and exports and second in the nation for total tonnage. The state’s maritime system continues to be a critical gateway to international trade and provides the residents of the state with a multitude of economic opportunities through the movement of waterborne commerce and trade. In 2015, the Texas Ports Association conducted an economic study focused on defining the value of Texas ports to the state and the nation. Maritime activity at Texas ports: • Moved over 563 million tons of cargo including 350 million tons of international tonnage and nearly 200 million tons of domestic cargo • Handled over 1.8 million containers • Served over 1.6 million cruise passengers • Supported over 1.5 million jobs in the state • Provided over $368 billion in total economic value to the state, 23% of the overall state GDP • Generated over $92 billion in personal income and local consumption of goods • Generated $6.9 billion of state and local taxes Texas ports are critical economic engines for their communities and the state.
    [Show full text]
  • MARINE TERMINAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PORT of HOUSTON and HAPAG-LLOVD"A.G
    MARINE TERMINAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PORT OF HOUSTON and HAPAG-LLOVD"A.G FEDERAL MARITIME AGREEMENT NUMBER: 201177 APPROVAL DATE: EXPIRATION DATE: TEN YEARS AFTER APPROVAL; OPTION TO RENEW FOR FIVE YEARS 'JAN 1 8 2008 c::~ (al .0 0- UNDER THE e:;; % SHIPf'j~IG ACT ,:{?! ~4t OF 1984 .<':' qritime C~/ MARINE TERMINAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY AND HAPAG-LLOYD AC TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Term 1 2. Applicability ofTariffs I 3. Throughput and Empty Handling Charges 2 4. Preferential Berthing 5 5. Empty Container Yard 7 6. Cargo Commitment 8 7. Applicability of Agreement 9 8. Events of Default 9 9. Remedies on Event ofDefault 10 10. Payments by Carrier 10 II. Filing II 12. Force Majeure II 13. Assignments II 14. StowawaysfUnauthorized Access to Vessels 12 15. Subordination of Liens 12 16. Notices 12 17. General Provisions 12 FMC Agreement No. 201177 MARINE TERMINAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY AND HAPAG-LLOYD AG This Marine Telminal Services Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into as of the date last set forth beneath the parties' signatures below (the "Effective Date"), by and between the Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas, a governmental subdivision of the State ofTexas ("PHA"), and Hapag-L1oyd AG, a German stock corporation (the "Canier") with reference to the following: A. PHA owns and operates Fentress Bracewell Barbours Cut Container Terminal ("Barbours Cut Terminal"), and Bayport Container Temlinal ("Bayport Terminal"), and in connection therewith is a Marine Terminal Operator, as provided for in the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 App. U.S.c.
    [Show full text]