Digital Railways: How New Innovations Can Change the Approach to Rail Infrastructure Planning
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Signalling on the High-Speed Railway Amsterdam–Antwerp
Computers in Railways XI 243 Towards interoperability on Northwest European railway corridors: signalling on the high-speed railway Amsterdam–Antwerp J. H. Baggen, J. M. Vleugel & J. A. A. M. Stoop Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands Abstract The high-speed railway Amsterdam (The Netherlands)–Antwerp (Belgium) is nearly completed. As part of a TEN-T priority project it will connect to major metropolitan areas in Northwest Europe. In many (European) countries, high-speed railways have been built. So, at first sight, the development of this particular high-speed railway should be relatively straightforward. But the situation seems to be more complicated. To run international services full interoperability is required. However, there turned out to be compatibility problems that are mainly caused by the way decision making has taken place, in particular with respect to the choice and implementation of ERTMS, the new European railway signalling system. In this paper major technical and institutional choices, as well as the choice of system borders that have all been made by decision makers involved in the development of the high-speed railway Amsterdam–Antwerp, will be analyzed. This will make it possible to draw some lessons that might be used for future railway projects in Europe and other parts of the world. Keywords: high-speed railway, interoperability, signalling, metropolitan areas. 1 Introduction Two major new railway projects were initiated in the past decade in The Netherlands, the Betuweroute dedicated freight railway between Rotterdam seaport and the Dutch-German border and the high-speed railway between Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and the Dutch-Belgian border to Antwerp (Belgium). -
Allegato 2 Piano ERTMS Evidenza Modifiche.Pdf
Allegato 2 Piano Accelerato ERTMS revisione O con evidenza delle modifiche rispetto alla revisione N e-POD banca dati documentale RFI - download effettuato il 04/09/2020 19:18:20 stato di vigenza: IN VIGORE livello riservatezza Uso pubblico Piazza della Croce Rossa, 1 - 00161 Roma Rete Ferroviaria Italiana – Società per Azioni - Gruppo Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane Società con socio unico soggetta all’attività di direzione e coordinamento di Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane S.p.A. a norma dell’art. 2497 sexies del cod. civ. e del D.Lgs. n. 112/2015 Sede legale: Piazza della Croce Rossa, 1 - 00161 Roma Cap. Soc. euro 31.528.425.067,00 Iscritta al Registro delle Imprese di Roma ––– Cod. Fisc. 01585570581 e P. Iva 01008081000 – R.E.A. 758300 Codifica: PIANO DI SVILUPPO ERTMS/ETCS FOGLIO e GSM-R RFI TC.SCC SR RR AP 01 R05 O 1 di 130 PIANO DI SVILUPPO DI ERTMS (ETCS E GSM-R) SULLA RETE RFI Rev. Data Descrizione Verifica Tecnica Autorizzazione S. Buonincontri Aggiornamenti e stato di D. Caronti avanzamento attività in M. Ciaffi realizzazione rispetto al National Implementation S. Geraci O 23/07/2020 Plan e rimodulazione della G. Gallo F. Senesi e-POD banca dati documentale RFI - download effettuato il 04/09/2020 19:18:20 stato di vigenza: IN VIGORE livello riservatezza Uso pubblico proposta RFI del piano C. Iommazzo “accelerato” di rinnovamento tecnologico guidato da S. Marcoccio ERTMS G. Ridolfi D. Schiavoni PIANO DI SVILUPPO ERTMS/ETCS Codifica: FOGLIO 2 di 130 e GSM-R RFI TC.SCC RR AP 01 R05 O ELABORAZIONE DOCUMENTO VERIFICA EFFETTUATA Marco -
X2rail-1 Deliverable D7.1 Analysis of Existing Lines and Economic Models
X2Rail-1 Project Title: Start-up activities for Advanced Signalling and Automation Systems Starting date: 01/09/2016 Duration in months: 36 Call (part) identifier: H2020-S2RJU-CFM-2015-01-1 Grant agreement no: 730640 Deliverable D7.1 Analysis of existing lines and economic models Due date of deliverable Month 09 Actual submission date 18-02-2019 Organization name of lead contractor for this deliverable 18-TTS Dissemination level PU Revision DB-001-02-R2 Deliverable template version: 02 (09/11/16) X2Rail-1 Deliverable D7.1 Analysis of existing lines and economic models Authors Author(s) Alstom Transport S.A. (ALS) Pierre Damien Jourdain AZD Praha SRO (AZD) Michal Pavel Lukas Michalik BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SWEDEN AB (BTSE) Jorgen Mattisson INDRA (INDRA) Francisco Parrilla Thales Transportation Systems GMBH (TTS) Ana Millán Belen Losada Trafikverket – TRV (TRV) Jan Bystrom Contributor(s) ANSALDO STS S.p.A. (ASTS) Giovanni Canepa CAF Signalling S.L. (CAF) Ignacio Gonzalez Deutsche Bahn AG (DB) Julian Mohr MERMEC SPA (MERMEC) Vito Caliandro Siemens (SIE) Jose Manuel Mellado GA 730640 Page 2 of 165 X2Rail-1 Deliverable D7.1 Analysis of existing lines and economic models 1. Executive Summary The present document constitutes the first issue of Deliverable D7.1 “Analysis of existing lines and economic models” in the framework of the Project titled “Start-up activities for Advanced Signalling and Automation Systems” (Project Acronym: X2Rail-1; Grant Agreement No 730640). Although modern signalling systems are going to considerably reduce trackside equipment in the next years, a source of the innovation step proposed by the X2Rail-1 WP7 is to provide fully distributed control of remote trackside objects such as points, level crossings, etc., without requiring the necessity to install specialized trackside cabling and associated cable routes, ducting etc. -
HS1 Escrow Arrangements
Final Report July 2018 HS1 Escrow Arrangements Office of Rail and Road Our ref: 23336101 Final Report July 2018 HS1 Escrow Arrangements Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Office of Rail and Road 28-32 Upper Ground One Kemble Street London SE1 9PD London WC2B 4AN +44 20 7910 5000 www.steergroup.com Our ref: 23336101 Steer has prepared this material for Office of Rail and Road. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. HS1 Escrow Arrangements | Final Report Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Purpose of the Study .......................................................................................................... 1 Our approach ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 Background ............................................................................................................... 2 -
A System Solution to Optimize the Maintenance Process
A System Solution to Optimize The Maintenance Process © 2012 ERDMANN-Softwaregesellschaft mbH Introduction - 2 IRISSYS® (International Railway Inspection and Services System) 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The Process of Maintenance ....................................................................... 1 1.2 The Task .............................................................................................. 1 1.3 The Solution .......................................................................................... 3 1.4 Your Partner .......................................................................................... 3 2 Advantages at a Glance .................................................................................. 4 3 IRISSYS® - Solutions ..................................................................................... 6 3.1 Inspection Data Management ...................................................................... 6 3.2 Analysis ............................................................................................... 9 3.3 Maintenance and Repair ........................................................................... 14 3.4 Fast Portability to Different Route Networks .................................................. 19 4 IRISSYS® - Software .................................................................................... 21 4.1 Systems Architecture ............................................................................. -
Eine Optimierte ETCS-Architektur Für Regionalstrecken ETCS L1 – an Optimised ETCS Architecture for Regional Lines
ETCS | ETCS www.eurailpress.de/archiv/etcs ETCS L1 – Eine optimierte ETCS-Architektur für Regionalstrecken ETCS L1 – an optimised ETCS architecture for regional lines Peter Laumen | Tim Kipshagen | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Nils Nießen as europäische Zugbeeinflussungssystem ETCS (European he European Train Control System (ETCS) is currently D Train Control System) wird aktuell auf den Hauptstrecken T being introduced on main lines, in particular in the TEN / (insbesondere den TEN-Korridoren) eingeführt. Auf Neben- und corridors. ETCS has not yet been regularly implemented on Regionalstrecken kommt ETCS jedoch bisher üblicherweise nicht regional and secondary lines, but some countries are awaiting Seiten der zur Anwendung. Einige Länder erwarten zukünftig günstige inexpensive future ETCS solutions for these lines. The use of Aachen ETCS-Lösungen für diese Streckenarten. Durch die Digitalisierung new digital technologies and the resulting digital interlocking und die daraus resultierenden ESTW bzw. digitalen Stellwerke makes it possible to optimise the existing ETCS architecture. (DSTW) kann die bisherige ETCS-Architektur optimiert werden. In addition to the possibility of generating ETCS telegrams RWTH Mit den Möglichkeiten der DSTW, Telegramme zur Laufzeit im Besucher in the digital interlocking (DI) at runtime, ETCS Level 1 (L1) für Stellwerk zu generieren und über Balisen an den Zug zu übertra- lines can also be designed dynamically, which results in ad- für gen, kann eine ETCS Level 1 Full Supervision (L1 FS)-Strecke dyna- ditional benefits. There are significant operating advantages misch gestaltet werden und dadurch einen Mehrwert generieren. with regard to speed restrictions, block sections, the trans- 2020 Es ergeben sich wesentliche betriebliche Vorteile u. a. bei Lang- mission of route specific information, the integration of level samfahrstellen, der Blockteilung, der fahrstraßenabhängigen In- crossings and shunting under ETCS, for example. -
Today. for Tomorrow. for Us
Today. For tomorrow. For us. ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ÖBB-INFRASTRUKTUR AG Contents CONSOLIDATED MANAGEMENT REPORT 2 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 80 A. Group structure and investments 2 Consolidated Income Statement 2019 80 B. General conditions and market environment 5 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 2019 81 C. Economic report and outlook 10 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as of Dec 31, 2019 82 D. Research and development 29 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 2019 83 E. Group relationships 31 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 2019 84 F. Opportunity and risk report 32 G. Non-financial statement 37 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of Dec 31, 2019 H. Notes to the Group Management Report 77 85 A. Basis and Methods 85 Glossary 78 B. Notes to the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Statement pursuant to Section 124 (1) of the and the Consolidated Income Statement 106 Stock Exchange Act 79 C. Other Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 133 Audit Certificate 162 ÖBB-Infrastruktur Aktiengesellschaft Consolidated Management Report | Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated Management Report A. Group structure and investments 2 The ÖBB-Infrastruktur Group must ensure the economic and efficient use of Austria's railway infrastructure and its aavailabilityvailability to all railway operators on a non-discriminatory basis. At the same time, the ÖBB-Infrastruktur Group builds Austria's railway infrastructure on behalf of the Republic of Austria. The financing of the capital expenditures in rail infrastructure development is ensured through the cash flow generated, outside capital and guarantees and investment grants from the federal government on the basis of multi-year master plans. -
Ruediger-Brandt-Siemens.Pptx.Pdf
RailTech Europe LIVE ´21 Page 1 Unrestricted | © Siemens Mobility GmbH 2021 | SMO RI ML ETCS reached a high level of maturity and interoperability ▪ Targets of the EDP 2016/17 ▪ Horizon 2023 40 % of the “Core Network Corridors” ▪ Horizon 2030 51.000 km of ERTMS in operation ▪ History ▪ 1990s: Early pilots in CH, IT, DE, FR, AT/HU, … ▪ 2000s: Early adaptors: ES, IT, CH, NL, LX, BE, … ▪ 2020: Global success > 90,000 km contracted ▪ Several countries strive for a complete migration CH, BE, DK, IT, LX, NL, NO, AT, … Page 2 Unrestricted | © Siemens Mobility GmbH 2021 | SMO RI ML The 5 „ETCS Game Changer“ as a Chance „Game Changer“ Vorteile Capacity, Energy ATO Efficiency ETCS Level 3 / Hybrid L3 Capacity, CAPEX, OPEX FRMCS Capacity, Life-Cycle-Cost Satellite Positioning CAPEX, OPEX Braking Curves Capacity Page 3 Unrestricted | © Siemens Mobility GmbH 2021 | SMO RI ML „ATO over ETCS“ ETCS is the enabler for automation in an interoperabel way Grades of Automation (GoA) Driver assistance – Highly automated driving- Fully automated driving Fully automated driving Manual driving Surveillance by driver Supervisor on board Unattended (DAS) (ATO) (DTO) (UTO) The current ATO activities of Siemens Mobility: ATO is interoperable and ready for broader implementation Thameslink Moorgate DSH – S-Bahn Hamburg ERTMS Trackside AoE P44 / ETCS BL3.3 AoE P44 ETCS BL3.4 AoE S2R Norway Update ETCS BL3.6 ETCS BL3.6 AoE S2R X2Rail-1 WP4 X2Rail-3 WP10 SBB Demonstrator ZBMS* Demonstrator AoE S2R: Reference Test Bench ATO for DB Cargo / TRAXX Lok Gateway Phase1 (SS -
Paradox of the Bermuda Triangle Applying Systems Engineering in a PPP-Environment
Paradox of the Bermuda Triangle Applying Systems Engineering in a PPP-environment Robert Audsley René van der Vooren Booz Allen Hamilton Movares 7 Savoy Court; Strand PO Box 2855 London WC2R 0EZ; UK 3500 GW Utrecht; NL [email protected] [email protected] Erik Elich Monto Krommeweg 8 5708 JM Helmond; NL [email protected] Copyright © 2008 by the authors. Published and used by INCOSE with permission. Abstract. Applying Systems Engineering to a Public Private Partnership (PPP) contract requires a closed-loop control between the project goals, the project management and the content itself. Unexpected events, contradicting incentives and many more reasons can easily open the closed- loop without initially being perceived. All parties involved should participate actively at peer levels in order to assure the closed-loop control. The transparent and phased approach of Systems Engineering supports achieving this peer level closed-loop control. Introduction HSL-Zuid. In the Netherlands the High-Speed Line Zuid (HSL-Zuid) connects the country to the Trans-European Network of High-Speed Lines. Fast trains, with a maximum speed of 300 kilometres per hour, will take travellers directly from Amsterdam to Schiphol, Rotterdam, Antwerp, Brussels and Paris. This offers significant advantages. Travelling by high-speed train is fast and comfortable. Both domestic and international travel times are reduced significantly: thirty minutes from Amsterdam to Rotterdam and 3 hours from Amsterdam to Paris (compared with current times as shown in figure 1). Passengers travel from one city centre to the next, without parking problems, check-in times or changing trains. In this way, travel within the Randstad and to various European cities will become much easier. -
European Experiences with ERTMS Implementation: the Case of the High-Speed Railway Amsterdam-Antwerp
Advanced Train Control Systems 123 European experiences with ERTMS implementation: the case of the high-speed railway Amsterdam-Antwerp J. H. Baggen, J. M. Vleugel & J. A. A. M. Stoop Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands Abstract The high-speed railway Amsterdam (The Netherlands)-Antwerp (Belgium) is nearly completed. As part of a TEN-T priority project it will connect to major metropolitan areas in Northwest Europe. High-speed railways have been built in many (European) countries. So, at first sight, the development of this particular high-speed railway should be relatively straightforward, but the situation seems to be more complicated. Full interoperability is necessary in order to run direct international services. However, there turned out to be compatibility problems that are mainly caused by the way decision making has taken place, in particular with respect to the choice and implementation of ERTMS, the new European railway signalling system. In this contribution major technical and institutional choices, as well as the choice of system borders, that have all been made by decision makers involved in the development of the high-speed railway Amsterdam-Antwerp will be analyzed. This will make it possible to draw some lessons that might be used for future railway projects in Europe and other parts of the world. Keywords: high-speed railway, interoperability, signalling, metropolitan areas. 1 Introduction Two major new railway projects were initiated in the past decade in The Netherlands, the Betuweroute dedicated freight railway between Rotterdam seaport and the Dutch-German border and the high-speed railway between Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and the Dutch-Belgian border to Antwerp (Belgium). -
(CCS) and Migration to ERTMS
FEASIBILITY STUDY REFERENCE FEASIBILITY STUDY REFERENCE SYSTEM ERTMS FinalSYSTEM Report ERTMS DigitalisationFinal Report of CCS (Control Command and Signalling) and MigrationDigitalisation to ERTMS of CCS (Control Command and Signalling) and Migration to ERTMS European Railway Agency - 2017 23 OP European Railway Agency - 2017 23 OP 14 AUGUST 2018 14 AUGUST 2018 FEASIBILITY STUDY REFERENCE SYSTEM ERTMS Contact ANDRÉ VAN ES Arcadis Nederland B.V. P.O. Box 220 3800 AE Amersfoort The Netherlands Our reference: 083702890 A - Date: 2 November 2018 2 of 152 FEASIBILITY STUDY REFERENCE SYSTEM ERTMS CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 9 1.1 EU Context of Feasibility Study 9 1.2 Digitalisation of the Rail Sector 9 1.3 Objectives of Feasibility Study 11 1.4 Focus of Feasibility Study 11 1.5 Report Structure 12 2 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 13 2.1 Methodology 13 2.2 Scope Addition 15 2.3 Wider Pallet of Interviewed Parties 15 2.4 Timeframes 19 3 INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGERS 20 3.1 Findings and Trends Infrastructure Managers 20 3.2 Reasons for Replacing Non-ETCS Components 28 3.3 Short-Term versus Long-Term 31 4 OPERATING COMPANIES 33 4.1 Dutch Railways (NS) 33 4.2 DB Cargo 35 4.3 RailGood 36 4.4 European Rail Freight Association 37 4.5 Findings and Trends Operating Companies 38 5 RAIL INDUSTRY SUPPLIERS 40 5.1 Supplier 1 40 5.2 Supplier 2 41 5.3 Supplier 3 42 5.4 Supplier 4 42 5.5 Supplier 5 42 Our reference: 083702890 A - Date: 2 November 2018 3 of 152 FEASIBILITY STUDY REFERENCE SYSTEM ERTMS 5.6 Findings and Trends Suppliers 43 6 RAILWAY INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES -
SWUTC/11/476660-00071-1 High Speed Rail
1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. SWUTC/11/476660-00071-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date High Speed Rail: A Study of International Best Practices August 2011 and Identification of Opportunities in the U.S. 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Beatriz Rutzen and C. Michael Walton Report 476660-00071-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin 11. Contract or Grant No. 1616 Guadalupe Street DTRT07-G-0006 Austin, TX 78701 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Southwest Region University Transportation Center Research Report Texas Transportation Institute September 2009 – August 2011 Texas A&M University System 14. Sponsoring Agency Code College Station, TX 77843-3135 15. Supplementary Notes Supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers program 16. Abstract In the United States, passenger rail has always been less competitive than in other parts of the world due to a number of factors. Many argue that in order for a passenger rail network to be successful major changes in service improvement have to be implemented to make it more desirable to the user. High-speed rail can offer such service improvement. With the current administration’s allocation of $8 billion in its stimulus package for the development of high-speed rail corridors and a number of regions being interested in venturing into such projects it is important that we understand the factors and regulatory structure that needs to exist in order for passenger railroad to be successful.