Regional Variation in Juice Quality Characteristics of Four Cider Apple

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regional Variation in Juice Quality Characteristics of Four Cider Apple HORTSCIENCE 51(12):1498–1502. 2016. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI11209-16 and accounted for 6% of the total U.S. cider production in 2015 (TTB, 2016). The number of cideries in Washington increased more than 5- Regional Variation in Juice Quality fold in the last 9 years, from less than 10 cideries in2007to56reportedcideriesin2015(North- Characteristics of Four Cider Apple west Cider Association, 2015; The Cyder Mar- ket, 2015). (Malus 3domestica Borkh.) Cultivars in Quality cider is traditionally made from bittersweet (acid <0.45%, tannin >0.20%) and bittersharp (acid >0.45%, tannin >0.20%) Northwest and Central Washington cider apples (Barker and Burroughs, 1953). Travis Robert Alexander1, Jacqueline King, Andrew Zimmerman, Growers have historically selected cider apple and Carol A. Miles cultivars for their fruit acid and tannin content levels (Alwood, 1903; Barker, 1911; Buell, Department of Horticulture, Washington State University Northwestern 1869; Trowbridge, 1917). As the supply of Washington Research and Extension Center, 16650 State Route 536, cider apples is heavily outweighed by demand, Mount Vernon, WA 98273 dessert apple juice often forms the base of both craft and industrial ciders as it tends to be more Additional index words. bittersharp, bittersweet, ‘Brown Snout’, Dabinett’, ‘Kingston Black’, readily available and relatively inexpensive ‘Yarlington Mill’, acid, tannin (Merwin et al., 2008; Moulton et al., 2010). Abstract. In this study, four cider apple (Malus 3domestica) cultivars, Brown Snout, Dabinett, Craft cider makers usually achieve their de- Kingston Black, and Yarlington Mill, were collected from four orchards, two in northwest sired levels of bitterness and sharpness by Washington and two in central Washington, to compare juice quality characteristics. blending in bittersweet, bittersharp, and crab Northwest Washington has a cool, humid summer climate (16.0 8C on average during this apple cultivars, whereas industrial cider ma- study) and is the origin of the state’s cider apple industry, while central Washington has a hot, kers add exogenous malic acid and tannin dry summer climate (22.1 8C on average during this study) and is the center of the state’s (Khanizadeh et al., 2000; Lea, 2008; Merwin dessert apple industry. Each year from 2012 to 2015, fruit of the four cultivars were harvested et al., 2008; Pollard, 1953). For product consis- and stored at each orchard until they were collected. Fruit were pressed and the juice analyzed tency, cider makers should chemically analyze for five quality characteristics important to cider making: soluble solids concentration [SSC their juice throughout production (M. Roberts, (%)], specific gravity (SG), pH, titratable acidity [TA, malic acid equivalent (g·LL1)], and personal communication). The ability to create tannin [tannic acid equivalent (%)]. Harvest dates and climate data were recorded annually a consistent product is critical in an industry for each orchard location. There were no significant differences in any of the juice quality where juice supply varies from year to year both characteristics due to region and no significant interaction of region, cultivar, and/or year. in quantity and characteristics. Results did show, as expected, a significant difference in all five juice characteristics due to Chemical analysis of cider juice gener- cultivar. ‘Brown Snout’, ‘Dabinett’, and ‘Kingston Black’ were higher in SSC and SG than ally includes an assessment of SSC (%), SG, · –1 ‘Yarlington Mill’; ‘Dabinett’ had the highest pH and lowest TA while ‘Kingston Black’ had pH, TA [malic acid equivalent (g L )], and the lowest pH and highest TA; and tannin was highest in ‘Yarlington Mill’ and lowest in tannin [tannic acid equivalent (%)]. SSC and ‘Kingston Black’. There was also a difference in SG and tannin due to year; SG was lowest in SG can be measured with a refractometer, 2013 while tannin was highest in 2012. The difference in SG from year to year may be a result which measures the refractive index of a so- of variable year-to-year storage time at each orchard before collection of fruit. The difference lution, or a hydrometer, which measures the in tannin from year to year was likely due to climatic variation over the four years of this relative density of a solution to a reference study. On average, growing degree days (GDD) increased 10% and chilling hours (CH) (usually pure water), assuming proper cali- decreased 10% from 2012 to 2015 in both regions. Classification of the four cultivars included bration of each instrument. A refractometer in this study differed from historical records at the Long Ashton Research Station (LARS) in is generally used prefermentation as ethanol England; in the current study, the four cultivars exhibited tannin levels below 0.20% and significantly alters the refractive index, would not be classified as bitter, unlike their historical classification at LARS. Results from whereas a hydrometer is used throughout this study indicate that variations in juice quality characteristics occur between cultivars as fermentation with decreasing accuracy to- expected and occur within a cultivar from year-to-year, but for the four cultivars included in ward the end of fermentation as increasing this study variations did not occur due to production region in Washington. ethanol alters the density of the solution (often providing for a negative sugar con- centration). Prefermentation measures of Cider is fermented apple (Malus ·domestica less than 1.2% alcohol by volume (ABV) as both SSC and SG are used to predict alcohol Borkh.) juice, and is often referred to as found in French cidre doux, to 8.5% ABV in content postfermentation and accordingly hard cider in the United States in contrast to traditional English ciders (Lea, 2008). In the aide the cider maker in deciding if exoge- the nonfermented, unfiltered apple juice United States, current federal law defines nous sugar should be added or if juices with that is referred to as fresh cider or sweet cider by an ABV of less than 8.5%; anything higher sugar content should be blended cider (Khanizadeh et al., 2000; Trowbridge, above this ABV may still be considered a cider (Moulton et al., 2010). pH can be measured with a pH meter or pH indicator paper, the 1917).Cidermayvaryinalcoholcontentfrom but is taxed at a higher wine or champagne rate choice depending on the cider maker’s depending on percent ABV and carbonation preference for accuracy. TA can be mea- levels [Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade sured by titration with a base using pH Received for publication 21 July 2016. Accepted Bureau (TTB), 2015]. Although cider only indicator paper or a pH meter to reach the for publication 8 Sept. 2016. accounts for 1% of the alcoholic beverage targeted endpoint, again the choice regard- We gratefully acknowledge the financial support market in the United States, it is the fastest ing the method for monitoring pH is based provided by the Washington State Department of growing segment with a 22-fold increase in on preference for accuracy. Cider makers Agriculture, Washington State University Center production from 2007 to 2015 (TTB, 2016). In target a pH range of 3.3–3.7 and a TA range for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources, 2007, 2.9 million liters of cider were produced of 1.0–15.0 g·L–1 malic acid (Mitchell, Northwest Agricultural Research Foundation, in the United States, increasing to 65 million Northwest Cider Association, and State project 2015). For pH, the targeted range is based WN00427–Acc. no.1000194. liters in 2015 (TTB, 2016). The volume of cider on optimal yeast fermentation conditions, 1Corresponding author. E-mail: travis.alexander@ produced in Washington grew 25-fold from and for TA, the targeted range is based on wsu.edu. 2007 to 2015, from 168,000 to 4 million liters, desired final product flavor, specifically 1498 HORTSCIENCE VOL. 51(12) DECEMBER 2016 sharpness. Tannin is traditionally measured Washington State to make appropriate purchas- were black and fruit felt firm and/or had by titration with potassium permanganate and ing and planting decisions for their region. reached the desired threshold range of 11–14 indigo carmine indicator (Lowenthal, 1877). °Brix depending on cultivar and weather. For Tannin also contributes to final product flavor, Materials and methods WSU NWREC, apples were harvested when specifically the astringency and mouthfeel of seeds were black, flesh was in the 8–9 range on the cider. Cider apple orchards. This study included the 9-point BC/Ontario starch ripeness scale, Planting site has a significant impact on four orchards, with two orchards located in and/or fruit had reached the desired threshold apple fruit quality; for example Miller et al. northwest Washington, Alpenfire Cider and range of 11–14 °Brix depending on cultivar (2005) found an inconsistent interaction Washington State University Northwestern and weather (Chu and Wilson, 2000; Lau, between site and cultivar for more than one Washington Research and Extension Center 1988). For Snowdrift Cider Co., apples were juice quality characteristic. Specifically, the (WSU NWREC), and two orchards located in harvested when flesh surface area was greater authors found that SSC and TA were signif- central Washington, Snowdrift Cider Co. and than 60% free of starch (8–9 range on the icantly higher for apple cultivars Golden Tieton Cider Works. Alpenfire Cider is located BC/Ontario scale) and/or there was significant Delicious and Gala Supreme than for culti- in Port Townsend (48°4#57$, 122°52#34$) ground fall. For Tieton Cider Works, apples vars Fuji and Enterprise across 14 planting with a Tukey gravelly loam soil (isotic, mesic were harvested when seeds were black, fruit sites in North America. However, fruit Vitrandic Haploxerepts; U.S. Department of tasted sweet (subjective metric specific to the weight and TA were found to be signifi- Agriculture, 2013). The trees from which cider maker), and/or there was significant cantly higher for all four cultivars at the apples were harvested were grafted on dwarfing ground fall.
Recommended publications
  • National Apple Orchard Census 2012
    National Apple Orchard Census 2012 1 Table of Contents Introduction Page 3 Executive Summary Page 4 Section 1 Orchard Area, Sales, Growers and Markets Page 6 Section 2 Varieties and Orchard Age Page 15 Section 3 Employment, Facilities, Business Development and Producer Page 21 Profile Appendix Tables Table 1: Apple Production Area (hectares) by Year of Planting and Apple Type in Ireland in 2012 Table 2: Number of Apple Trees by Year of Planting and Apple Type in Ireland in 2012 Table 3: Number of Growers of Each Apple Type by County in Ireland in 2012 Table 4: Sales of 2011 Harvest by Market by County Table 5: Production Area, Number of Growers and Sales for Most Commonly Grown Apple Varieties in Ireland in 2011/12 Table 6: Average (median) Prices per Tonne by Market for 2011 harvest Table 7: Apple Production Area (hectares) in Ireland in 1980-2012 2 National Apple Orchard Census 2012 Introduction The National Apple Orchard Census 2012 was compiled from information provided by the 45 commercial apple growers operating in the Republic of Ireland in 2012. The census provides an important overview of apple production, and comparisons are made to previous censuses (2007, 2002 and 1997) where possible. The census surveyed all commercial orchards, defined as follows: - a production area of at least 0.2 hectares of apples, including cider apples - the fruit from the orchard is sold every year - the orchard is sprayed against pests/diseases every year, or maintained to organic standards Within the 45 growers, there are two organic growers. Production areas are based on areas planted up to March 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Apple Clones in the United States
    Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. 5 ARS 34-37-1 May 1963 A Survey of Apple Clones in the United States u. S. DFPT. OF AGRffini r U>2 4 L964 Agricultural Research Service U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PREFACE This publication reports on surveys of the deciduous fruit and nut clones being maintained at the Federal and State experiment stations in the United States. It will b- published in three c parts: I. Apples, II. Stone Fruit. , UI, Pears, Nuts, and Other Fruits. This survey was conducted at the request of the National Coor- dinating Committee on New Crops. Its purpose is to obtain an indication of the volume of material that would be involved in establishing clonal germ plasm repositories for the use of fruit breeders throughout the country. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Gratitude is expressed for the assistance of H. F. Winters of the New Crops Research Branch, Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, under whose direction the questionnaire was designed and initial distribution made. The author also acknowledges the work of D. D. Dolan, W. R. Langford, W. H. Skrdla, and L. A. Mullen, coordinators of the New Crops Regional Cooperative Program, through whom the data used in this survey were obtained from the State experiment stations. Finally, it is recognized that much extracurricular work was expended by the various experiment stations in completing the questionnaires. : CONTENTS Introduction 1 Germany 298 Key to reporting stations. „ . 4 Soviet Union . 302 Abbreviations used in descriptions .... 6 Sweden . 303 Sports United States selections 304 Baldwin.
    [Show full text]
  • We Make Delicious Cider from Freshly-Crushed Fruit How We Make It Happen the Zeffer Story
    WE MAKE DELICIOUS CIDER FROM FRESHLY-CRUSHED FRUIT HOW WE MAKE IT HAPPEN THE ZEFFER STORY OUR JOURNEY BEGAN ON SAM’S PARENTS FARM IN 2009 WHEN SAM DECIDED TO TRY HIS WINE-MAKING HAND AT MAKING CIDER. AFTER EXTENSIVE RESEARCH WE KNEW THE STYLE OF CIDER WE LIKED BEST. NOT JUST ANY OLD ‘MADE FROM CONCENTRATE’ CIDER, WE WANTED TO MAKE REAL CIDER FROM REAL FRUIT WITH PATIENCE, CRAFT AND QUALITY. We knew that the final product would taste its best if we started with the best ingredients so we scoured the country to find specific apple and pear varieties from orchards around New Zealand. After long wintery nights crushing, an exploding fruit press, experimental brews and many hours spent hand bottling we had our first batch ready for release in the Spring of 2009. We sold it exclusively through our local Matakana Farmers market and were rewarded with great feedback, eager buyers and steady growth which ultimately allowed us to build our own cidery. And, while we are now the proud owners of a shiny new fruit press we remain faithful to our simple vision and ethos of making cider that we are both proud to put our name on and love to drink. Our ciders are fermented in small batches and made with minimal intervention that allows the natural flavours and true character to shine without the use of any artificial colours or sweeteners. We love what we do and we love that we get to share it with you. From the Team at Zeffer PRODUCT RANGE We make a tasty drop or two Or for something a little more fancy Red Apple Cider FRESH FROM THE ORCHARD Our Red Apple Cider captures the fresh flavour of the unique Mahana Red apples used to make it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Craft Cider Revival – Some Technical Considerations Andrew Lea 28/2/2007 1
    The Craft Cider Revival – Some Technical Considerations Andrew Lea 28/2/2007 1 THE CRAFT CIDER REVIVAL ~ Some Technical Considerations Presentation to SWECA 28th February 2007 Andrew Lea SOME THINGS TO THINK ABOUT Orcharding and fruit selection Full juice or high gravity fermentations Yeast and sulphiting Keeving Malo-lactic maturation Style of finished product What is your overall USP? How are you differentiated? CRAFT CIDER IS NOW SPREADING Cidermaking was once widespread over the whole of Southern England There are signs that it may be returning eg Kent, Sussex and East Anglia So regional styles may be back in favour eg higher acid /less tannic in the East CHOICE OF CIDER FRUIT The traditional classification (Barker, LARS, 1905) Acid % ‘Tannin’ % Sweet < 0.45 < 0.2 Sharp > 0.45 < 0.2 Bittersharp > 0.45 > 0.2 Bittersweet < 0.45 > 0.2 Finished ~ 0.45 ~ 0.2 Cider CHOICE OF “VINTAGE QUALITY” FRUIT Term devised by Hogg 1886 Adopted by Barker 1910 to embrace superior qualities that could not be determined by analysis This is still true today! The Craft Cider Revival – Some Technical Considerations Andrew Lea 28/2/2007 2 “VINTAGE QUALITY” LIST (1988) Sharps / Bittersharps Dymock Red Kingston Black Stoke Red Foxwhelp Browns Apple Frederick Backwell Red Bittersweets Ashton Brown Jersey Harry Masters Jersey Dabinett Major White Jersey Yarlington Mill Medaille d’Or Pure Sweets Northwood Sweet Alford Sweet Coppin BLENDING OR SINGLE VARIETALS? Blending before fermentation can ensure good pH control (< 3.8) High pH (bittersweet) juices prone to infection Single varietals may be sensorially unbalanced unless ameliorated with dilution or added acid RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN pH AND TITRATABLE ACID IS NOT EXACT Most bittersweet juices are > pH 3.8 or < 0.4% titratable acidity.
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Snout’ Specialty Cider Apple U.S
    most popular alcoholic beverage made Yield, Labor, and Fruit and Juice Quality andconsumedintheUnitedStates; Characteristics of Machine and Hand-harvested however, by the early 1900s, cider had essentially disappeared from ‘Brown Snout’ Specialty Cider Apple U.S. markets (Proulx and Nichols, 1997). The rapid decline of cider 1 was due to a combination of factors, Carol A. Miles and Jaqueline King primarily a high influx of German and eastern European immigrants who ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. fruit storage, hard cider, harvest labor, Malus ·domestica, preferred beer, and many farmers mechanical fruit harvest, over-the-row harvester who were sympathetic to the Tem- perance Movement cut down their SUMMARY. In this 2-year study of ‘Brown Snout’ specialty cider apple apple trees (Watson, 1999). (Malus ·domestica) grafted onto Malling 27 (M.27) and East Malling/Long Ashton Cider is currently seeing a revival 9, we compared weight of total harvested fruit, labor hours for harvest, tree and fruit damage, and fruit and juice quality characteristics for machine and hand harvest. in the United States and although it Machine harvest was with an over-the-row small fruit harvester. There were no only accounts for 1% of the alcoholic significant differences due to rootstock; however, there were differences between beverage market, it is the fastest years for most measurements. Weight of harvested fruit did not differ because of growing alcohol market segment, harvest method; however, harvest efficiency was 68% to 72% for machine pick and with 54% increase in production each 85% to 89% for machine pick D clean-up weight (fruit left on trees and fruit year from 2007 to 2012 (Morton, knocked to the ground during harvest) as compared with hand harvest.
    [Show full text]
  • Apples: Akane Amere De Berthcourt (Cider) Ashmead Kernal Belle De
    Christianson’s Fruit Tree List 2019 Apples: Red Jonagold Akane Scarlet Sentinal Amere de Berthcourt (cider) Scarlet Surprise (red flesh) Ashmead Kernal Spartan Belle De Bogkoop (M-111) Whitney (crab) Beni Shogun Fuji Williams Pride Braeburn Yellow Transparent Brown Snout (cider) Centennial (crab) All semi-dwarf 106 rootstock (unless Chehalis otherwise noted). Semi-dwarf Cosmic Crisp rootstock (MM106) grows between Cortland (4-year old) 14’-18’ tall and wide. Space 20’ Cox’s Orange Pippen apart. Dwarf rootstock (M26), Early Pink Lady grows 12-16’ tall. Mini-dwarf (M27) Enterprise grows 6-8’ tall. Era (red flesh) Fameuse (M-111) European Pears: Firecracker (red flesh, 3-year old) Gold Sentinal Anjou Granvenstein Bartlett Gravenstein (dwarf) Bose Graventstein (mini-dwarf) Comice Honeycrisp Conference Honeycrisp (mini-dwarf) Flemish Beauty Hudson’s Golden Gem (M-111) Harrow Delight Jonagold Orcas Jonagold (dwarf) Red Bartlett Jonagold (mini-dwarf) Rescue Karmijn (4-year old) Seckel King Ubileen King (dwarf) Kingston Black (cider) Eurasian Pears: Liberty Liberty (mini-dwarf, 3-year old)) Maxie Melrose Reddy Robin Melrose (mini-dwarf) Mountain Rose (red flesh, 3-year old) Asian Pears: Northpole Pink Pearl Chojuro Red Gravenstien (dwarf) Hosui Nijisseiki Christianson’s Fruit Tree List 2019 Shinglo European Plums: Shinko Shinseiki Blue Damson Brooks All Semi-dwarf, Old Home x Green Gage Farmingdale 333 rootstock, grows Imperial Epeneuse 15-16’ tall. Italian Italian (dwarf St. Julien A) Fruiting Quince: Nadia (plum x cherry) Seneca Aromathaya Stanley Orange (3-year old) Yellow Egg Pineapple (3-year old) Smyra (3-year old) All Semi-dwarf Marianna rootstock, grows 14-16’ tall and wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible-Catalogue-2021
    Diacks Nursery Catalogue 2021 Friday, 21 May 2021 Retail 2021 APPLE APPLE ADORE TM SEMI DWARF, (DELFLOGA) Pot: 25 L Height: 150cm $49.99 Medium sized, very tasty, sweet, crisp and juicy apples in mid summer. An excellent variety for organic gardens. Disease resistant. APPLE ARIANE PVR SEMI DWARF Pot: 25 L Height: 150cm $49.99 LATE SEASON Fruit is of medium size, and has a slightly flattened shape. Rich aroma and flavour, crisp, sweet flesh with a hint of tartness. APPLE AUTENTO TM (DELCOROS) TALL, EATING Pot: 25 L Height: 150cm $49.99 LATE SEASON The fruit is tasty when eaten fresh off the tree. Good disease resistance. APPLE BALLARAT SEMI DWARF, HERITAGE / COOKING Pot: 25 L Height: 150cm $49.99 MID SEASON Large apple with light pink blush on green skin. Excellent baking & keeping qualities... APPLE BALLERINA TM WALTZ, TELAMON PVR Pot: 8.5 L Height: 100cm $49.99 MID SEASON Purpleish pink and white flowers followed by sweet juicy red and green apples. Flavour reminiscent of red delicious. Eating apple.. Grows to 2.5 in 5yrs APPLE BAUJADE SEMI-DWARF Pot: 25 L Height: 150cm $49.99 LATE SEASON French organic Granny Smith type apple . Medium sized, sweet and aromatic... APPLE BEDFORD CRAB SEMI-DWARF, CIDER/JELLY Pot: 8 L Height: 150cm $39.99 LATE SEASON This apple is ideal for making cider or jelly .Will grow in a wide range of sites APPLE BLACK PRINCE SEMI-DWARF, CIDER/COOKING/EATING Pot: 8 L Height: 150cm $44.99 MID SEASON Black Prince is a large tart apple.It has black or dark maroon red skin.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Steps to a Big Future for Massachusetts Cider
    Small Steps to a Big Future for Massachusetts Cider Apples Elizabeth Garofalo and Jon Clements University of Massachusetts In Massachusetts, our love aff air with cider has a long and illustrious -- if sometimes notorious -- history dĂďůĞϭ͘ůĞǀĞŶĐƵůƚŝǀĂƌƐŐƌĂĨƚĞĚŽŶƚŽŽůĚĞƌƚƌĞĞƐĂƚƚŚĞ that predates even John Chapman (AKA Johnny Ap- hDĂƐƐŽůĚ^ƉƌŝŶŐKƌĐŚĂƌĚŝŶĞůĐŚĞƌƚŽǁŶ͕D͘ pleseed). In recent decades, there has been a growing ĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶƐĂƌĞŐĞŶĞƌĂů͘ŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐŽĨĞĂĐŚ nationwide passion for the fermented beverage enjoyed ǀĂƌŝĞƚLJǁŝůůďĞĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞĚĨŽƌDƉƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͘ by our forebears. Unfortunately, there is a dearth in ƵůƚŝǀĂƌ &ůĂǀŽƌWƌŽĨŝůĞ production of desirable apples for traditional hard cider. ůŬŵĞŶĞ;ĂŬĂĂƌůLJtŝŶĚƐŽƌͿ ^ǁĞĞƚͲƐŚĂƌƉ (Re ferred to as just cider from here on, as it should ƐŚŵĞĂĚ͛Ɛ<ĞƌŶĞů ^ǁĞĞƚͲƐŚĂƌƉ be). This has led to a market fl ooded with a bevy of ŽƵƌƚWĞŶĚƵWůĂƚ ^ǁĞĞƚͲƚĂƌƚ apple-based adult cider beverages possessing less than ŐƌĞŵŽŶƚZƵƐƐĞƚƚ ^ǁĞĞƚͲƐŚĂƌƉ ůůŝƐŝƚƚĞƌ ŝƚƚĞƌƐǁĞĞƚ traditional qualities. There are some orchards in the &ŽdžǁŚĞůƉ ŝƚƚĞƌƐŚĂƌƉ Northeast that have been making positive headway in <ŝŶŐƐƚŽŶůĂĐŬ ŝƚƚĞƌƐŚĂƌƉ increasing traditional cider apple plantings. There re- DĞĚĂŝůůĞΖKƌ ŝƚƚĞƌƐǁĞĞƚ mains, however, a chronic shortage of traditional cider DŝĐŚĞůŝŶ ŝƚƚĞƌƐǁĞĞƚ apples (Fabien-Ouellet & Conner, 2017). This project ZĞĚĨŝĞůĚ ŝƚƚĞƌƐǁĞĞƚ aims to provide Massachusetts growers with informa- ^ƚ͘ĚŵƵŶĚ͛ƐZƵƐƐĞƚ ^ǁĞĞƚ tion specifi c to Massachusetts cider apple varieties that contribute to a quality top-shelf cider. Not all apple varieties are created equally. Some susceptibility. But, with craft cideries attempting to apples are far better suited for fresh eating and baking. distinguish themselves from mass-produced sweet- The supermarket is fi lled with varieties we all know tasting ciders often made from apple juice concentrate, and love: McIntosh, Honeycrisp, Fuji, and Gala. These there is an opportunity for local growers to fi nd a new varieties do not possess the characteristics necessary and exciting niche for their apples (Raboin, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's Cider Apples
    eat rows of young apple trees stand in a peaceful orchard close to Hereford. THE MAN Carefully staked and protected by wire fencing, WHO SAVED they guide the eye towards spectacular views of Hay Bluff and the Black Mountains. This is Tidnor Wood, Henry NMay’s piece of paradise, where for 14 years he worked, worried and enjoyed many moments BRITAIN’S of pleasure – picking apples as they hung heavy on the boughs, sharing barbecues with workers at the end of a hard day. Henry, however, is no ordinary grower and CIDER this is no ordinary orchard. It has now become a gene pool, regenerating Britain with hundreds of rare cider-apple varieties that would otherwise have been lost to the nation. Over years, the former Customs & Excise APPLES officer, now 71, built up a unique collection. Henry May had just been looking Slack-Ma-Girdle, Bloody Turk and Greasy Butcher are just some of the 400 varieties for a quirky project to occupy his time. growing here, with names evoking long- He ended up making an enormous vanished days when every West Country farmhouse had a few apple trees and workers contribution to our horticultural history were part-paid in cider. Yet the orchard came about almost by accident. Words Susannah Hickling In his mid-50s, Henry was living in Portrait Sean Malyon Northampton, had made money on property and wanted an unusual project. He had once been based in Hereford, where he checked the excise-duty records of cider companies and had enjoyed being involved with their work – including drinking the fruits of production! Since the Fifties, 90% of traditional orchards had vanished, lost to housing, other crops or intensive, commercial growing practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Apples for Cider
    Growing apples for Cider Nick Gunn, Wandering Aengus Ciderworks Salem, Oregon Key Considerations • For your own use or others? • Sold as juice or fruit? • Target market – Dry, Austere, English style? Funky French? N. American Heirloom? • Price point and format – What is the shelf price of the finished product? • Cull fruit from a “packing operation” or orchard run? • Marketplace growth potential – locally and regionally • Shelf life Key Considerations • Labor Availability – Crucially important for organic • Bloom/Harvest Timing • Bin logistics • Cold storage • Marketing : Terroir? Tourist routes. NWCA (Northwest Cider Association). USACM (United State Association of Cider Makers). • Is there a difference in the difference? Varieties that work in the Willamette Valley Bittersweets Yarlington Mill It is a vigorous tree that produces high yields of small yellow/red apples, the tree flowers early to mid season and it fruits mid season. Yarlngton Mill is sweet to bittersweet English cider apple. Firm, medium size apples hang on tree well. Late season blending apple. Bears consistently. Medium bitterness. Low Acidity. Dabinett A classic English hard cider apple variety. It is one of the most reliable and easy cider varieties to grow. Unlike many hard cider varieties which are best-used for blended ciders, Dabinett can also be used to produce a single-varietal full-bodied medium-dry cider. High astringency, medium bitterness, low acidity. Chisel Jersey The juice is bittersweet and very astringent. Ripens in late Fall. Chisel Jersey is one of the most famous of the Somerset bittersweets. The fruit is round-conic and red-striped with a brownish-pink blush. It has good sugar content and slow to medium fermentation, with medium acidity, very astringent, harsh and high in tannins Sharps Golden Russet The "champagne" of old-time cider apples, also delicious for eating and drying.
    [Show full text]
  • Worcestershire Cider Product Specification
    PRODUCT SPECIFICATION “Worcestershire Cider” PDO ( ) PGI (D) 1. Responsible department in the Member State: Name: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Area 3A Nobel House Smith Square London SW1P 3JR United Kingdom Tel: 0207 238 6075 Fax: 0207 238 5728 Email: [email protected] 2. Applicant Group: Name: The Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Gloucestershire Cider and Perry Makers Address: c/o G C Warren, H Weston and Sons Ltd The Bounds Much Marcle Herefordshire HR2 2NQ Tel: Fax: Email: Composition: Producer/processors (12) Other ( ) 3. Type of product: Cider - Class 1.8 (Other) 1 4. Specification (summary of requirements under Art 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012) 4.1. Name: “Worcestershire Cider” 4.2. Description: A traditional cider prepared by fermentation of the juice of locally grown bitter-sweet, bitter-sharp, sweet and sharp traditionally used cider apples, with or without the addition of up to 25% perry pear juice; chaptalisation is permitted to bring the potential alcohol level to ca 9.5% ABV prior to final blending of the cider. Ciders exhibit rich appley flavours, with marked astringency and with a balance between sweetness and bitterness. Products may be either medium sweet or dry (with regard to sweetness). Actual alcohol content by volume 4.0-8.5% Specific gravity at 20̊C 0.996-1.022 Sugar content 0.55g/1 Sugar-free dry extract >13g/1 Total acidity (as Malic Acid) 40-60 mEq/1 Volatile acidity (as Acetic Acid) <1.4g/1 Iron content <7mg/kg Copper content <2mg/kg Arsenic content <0.2mg/kg Lead content <0.2mg/kg Total Sulphur Dioxide <200mg/1 Free Sulphur Dioxide 40-60mg/1 4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Apple Growers
    1 VISION Ontario Apples…a healthy consumer…a healthy industry. MISSION To foster a viable apple industry through advocacy with government and collaboration with partners for the health of consumers and the wealth of producers. 2 FIFTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ONTARIO APPLE GROWERS Table of Contents CHAIR’S REPORT ................................................................................................................................................. 1 ACREAGE REVIEW............................................................................................................................................... 3 CROP ESTIMATE ................................................................................................................................................. 5 MARKETING REVIEW .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2018 OAG MEMBERSHIP .................................................................................................................................... 7 APPLE STATISTICS ............................................................................................................................................... 8 RISK MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................................................... 15 PROMOTIONS ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]