DOCSLIB.ORG

Merkezi Antlaşma Teşkilati

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Merkezi Antlaşma Teşkilati View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Suleyman Demirel University Research Repository T.C. SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI CENTO MERKEZİ ANTLAŞMA TEŞKİLATI (1959-1979) YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ Danışman Prof. Dr. Bayram KODAMAN Hazırlayan Ayşegül ŞENTÜRK Isparta - 2001 İÇİNDEKİLER ÖNSÖZ...................................................................................................................V KISALTMALAR....................................................................................................VII GİRİŞ TÜRK DIŞ POLİTİKASININ GENEL ÖZELLİKLERİ I. 1923 – 1939 DÖNEMİ TÜRK DIŞ POLİTİKASI ............................................... 1 II. İKİNCİ DÜNYA SAVAŞINDA TÜRK DIŞ POLİTİKASI .................................... 4 III. SAVAŞ SONRASI YENİ YAPILANMA VE TÜRKİYE’NİN BU YENİ ................. YAPILANMA İÇİNDEKİ YERİ .......................................................................... 7 A. SAVAŞ SONRASI GELİŞMELERİ VE BLOKLAŞMA .....................................................................................7 B. TRUMAN DOKTİRİNİ ...............................................................................................................................9 C. TÜRKİYE’NİN İTTİFAKLAR SİSTEMİNE GİRİŞİ........................................................................................11 1. Türk Dış Politikasına Truman Doktrini’nin Etkisi......................................................... 11 2. Türkiye’nin NATO’ya Giriş Süreci ................................................................................. 14 a. Orta Doğu Komutanlığı Projesi ve Türkiye ................................................................... 14 b. Türkiye'nin NATO’ ya Girişi ......................................................................................... 16 BİRİNCİ BÖLÜM BAĞDAT PAKTI ( 1955 - 1959 ) I. BAĞDAT PAKTININ KURULUŞU ................................................................. 21 A. BAĞDAT PAKTI ÖNCESİ ABD'NİN FAALİYETLERİ VE TÜRK - PAKİSTAN İKİLİ İŞBİRLİĞİ ANTLAŞMASI ..21 B. 24 ŞUBAT 1955 TARİHLİ TÜRK - IRAK İŞBİRLİĞİ ANTLAŞMASI ............................................................24 II. ÜLKELERİN PAKTTAN BEKLENTİLERİ VE PAKTIN AMAÇLARI.............. 27 A. TÜRKİYE'NİN PAKTTAN BEKLENTİLERİ.................................................................................................27 B. IRAK'İN PAKTTAN BEKLENTİLERİ .........................................................................................................28 C. İNGİLTERE'NİN PAKTA GİRİŞİ ................................................................................................................29 D. ABD'NİN PAKTTAN BEKLENTİLERİ ........................................................................................................30 E. PAKİSTAN VE İRAN'IN BAĞDAT PAKTINA KATILMASI...........................................................................32 F. PAKTIN AMAÇLARI ...............................................................................................................................34 III. BAĞDAT PAKTI TOPLANTILARI ................................................................. 35 IV. BAĞDAT PAKTINA ARAP ÜLKELERİNİN TEPKİLERİ................................ 36 V. BAĞDAT PAKTINI SONA ERDİREN BUHRANLAR..................................... 38 A. SÜVEYŞ BUHRANI .................................................................................................................................38 B. 1957 SURİYE BUHRANI.........................................................................................................................41 C. 1958 IRAK İHTİLALİ .............................................................................................................................42 D. BAĞDAT PAKTININ SONA ERMESİ.........................................................................................................44 VI. BAĞDAT PAKTININ ÜLKELER AÇISINDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ......... 45 A. BAĞDAT PAKTI VE ABD ........................................................................................................................45 B. BAĞDAT PAKTI VE SSCB .......................................................................................................................46 C. BAĞDAT PAKTI KARŞISINDA FRANSA VE İSRAİL .................................................................................47 D. BAĞDAT PAKTI VE TÜRKİYE.................................................................................................................48 E. BAĞDAT PAKTI SONUCUNDA İNGİLTERE, IRAK, İRAN VE PAKİSTAN ....................................................52 İKİNCİ BÖLÜM CENTO MERKEZİ ANTLAŞMA TEŞKİLATI ( 1959 - 1979 ) I. 5 MART 1959 TARİHİNDE ABD İLE YAPILAN İKİLİ İŞBİRLİĞİ ANTLAŞMALARI VE CENTO'NUN KURULUŞU........................................................................... 54 II. CENTO'NUN AMAÇLARI .............................................................................. 58 III. CENTO TOPLANTILARI................................................................................ 59 IV. CENTO'NUN YAPISI...................................................................................... 63 A. KONSEY ................................................................................................................................................63 B. KONSEYİN KOMİTELERİ ........................................................................................................................66 1. Ekonomik Komite............................................................................................................. 66 2. Yıkıcı Faaliyetlerle Mücadele Komitesi .......................................................................... 66 3. İrtibat Komitesi................................................................................................................. 67 4. Askeri Komite................................................................................................................... 67 C. SEKRETERLİK........................................................................................................................................69 1. Siyasi ve İdari İşler Dairesi.............................................................................................. 69 2. Ekonomik İşler Dairesi .................................................................................................... 69 3. Dış İlişkiler Dairesi ........................................................................................................... 70 4. Güvenlik Dairesi............................................................................................................... 70 V. CENTO ÇALIŞMALARI ................................................................................. 70 A. ULAŞTIRMA VE HABERLEŞME TESİSLERİ ..............................................................................................71 1. CENTO Demiryolu............................................................................................................ 72 2. CENTO Karayolu .............................................................................................................. 73 3. Telekomünikasyon, Yüksek Frekans ............................................................................. 74 4. CENTO Havayolu ve Sivil Havacılık ............................................................................... 75 5. CENTO Limanları.............................................................................................................. 75 B. KALKINMA YOLUNDA DİĞER ÇALIŞMALAR..........................................................................................76 1. Tarım ve Hayvancılık ....................................................................................................... 76 2. Sağlık................................................................................................................................. 76 3. Bilim .................................................................................................................................. 77 4. Madenlerin Aranması ve İşletilmesi ............................................................................... 77 5. Kültürde İşbirliği............................................................................................................... 78 6. Çok Taraflı Teknik İşbirliği Fonu .................................................................................... 78 VI. ORTA DOĞUDAKİ SİYASİ GELİŞMELERDE CENTO VE TÜRKİYE ( 1959-1979 ) ....................................................................................................................... 79 A. TÜKİYE-ABD İLİŞKİLERİ VE TÜRK DIŞ POLİTİKASINDA ÇOK YÖNLÜLÜĞE GEÇİŞ ................................79 B. 1965-1971 PAKİSTAN-HİNDİSTAN SAVAŞLARI .....................................................................................85 C. 1967 ARAP-İSRAİL SAVAŞI ...................................................................................................................89 D. İSLAM ZİRVE KONFERANSI ...................................................................................................................93 E. ÜRDÜN OLAYLARI ................................................................................................................................95 VII.İRAN OLAYLARI VE CENTO'NUN SONA ERMESİ ...................................... 96 ÜÇÜNCÜ BÖLÜM CENTO İLE İLGİLİ TEŞKİLATLAR RCD
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE CYPRUS QUESTION in the MAKING and the ATTITUDE of the SOVIET UNION TOWARDS the CYPRUS QUESTION (1960-1974) a Master's
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bilkent University Institutional Repository THE CYPRUS QUESTION IN THE MAKING AND THE ATTITUDE OF THE SOVIET UNION TOWARDS THE CYPRUS QUESTION (1960-1974) A Master’s Thesis by MUSTAFA ÇAĞATAY ASLAN DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2008 To my grandfathers Osman OYMAK and Mehmet Akif ASLAN, THE CYPRUS QUESTION IN THE MAKING AND THE ATTITUDE OF THE SOVIET UNION TOWARDS THE CYPRUS QUESTION (1960-1974) The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by MUSTAFA ÇAĞATAY ASLAN In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2008 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. --------------------------- Associate Prof. Hakan Kırımlı Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. --------------------------- Assistant Prof. Dr. Nur Bilge Criss Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. --------------------------- Assistant Prof. Dr. Eugenia Kermeli Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences --------------------------- Prof. Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT THE CYPRUS QUESTION IN THE MAKING AND THE ATTITUDE OF THE SOVIET UNION TOWARDS THE CYPRUS QUESTION (1960-1974) Aslan, Mustafa Çağatay M.A., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Associate Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo-Kemalism Vs. Neo-Democrats?
    ' TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY BETWEEN 1960-1971: NEO-KEMALISM VS. NEO-DEMOCRATS? Sedat LAÇ 0NER ‘I hope you will understand that your NATO allies have not had a chance to consider whether they have an obligation to protect Turkey against the Soviet Union if Turkey takes a step which results in Soviet intervention without the full consent and understanding of its NATO allies.’ 1 Lyndon B. Johnson, US President, 1964 ‘Atatürk taught us realism and rationalism. He was not an ideologue.’ 2 Süleyman Demirel , Turkish Prime Minister Abstract In the post-coup years two main factors; the détente process, and as a result of the détente significant change in the United States’ policies towards Turkey, started a chain-reaction process in Turkish foreign policy. During the 1960s several factors forced Turkish policy makers towards a new foreign policy. On the one hand, the Western attitude undermined the Kemalist and other Westernist schools and caused an ideological transformation in Turkish foreign policy. On the other hand, the military coup and disintegration process that it triggered also played very important role in the foreign policy transformation process. Indeed, by undermining Westernism in Turkey, the West caused an ideological crisis in Kemalism and other foreign policy schools. The 1960s also witnessed the start of the disintegration process in Turkish politics that provided a suitable environment for the resurgence of the Ottoman schools of thought, such as Islamism and Turkism. 1 The Middle East Journal , Vol. 20, No. 3, Summer 1966, p. 387. 2 0hsan Sabri Ça /layangil, Anılarım, ( My Memoirs ), ( 0stanbul: Güne 2, 1990), p.
    [Show full text]
  • 1950-1960 Arası Türkiye'de Uygulanan Sosyo-Ekonomik Politikalar
    Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute Yıl/Year: 2012 Cilt/Volume: 9 Sayı/Issue: 19, s. 47-63 1950-1960 ARASI TÜRKİYE’DE UYGULANAN SOSYO-EKONOMİK POLİTİKALAR Arş. Gör. Osman Cenk KANCA Kafkas Üniversitesi İİBF, İktisat Bölümü, [email protected] Özet Demokrat Parti 1950 yılında 27 yıllık tek parti iktidarına seçimle son vermiştir. DP iktidarı döneminde siyaset, halkın tabanına yayılmış böylelikle Türk siyasal hayatına pozitif katkıda bulunurken baskıcı devletçi anlayıştan milli, liberal bir sosyo-ekonomik yapının doğmasını sağlamıştır. Tarım reformu, dış ticaretin serbestleştirilmesi, yatırım harcamalarının yükselişi, sanayileşmede özel sektöre öncülük verme, işçilere yönelik sosyal politika yasalarının çıkarılması dönemin en belirgin özellikleri arasında yer almaktadır. Bu bağlamda Türkiye’de katı politik yapı son bulmuş ve ülke tarihinin en önemli değişimine tanık olmuştur. Çalışmada DP dönemindeki sosyo-ekonomik politikalar incelenmiştir. Bu inceleme gerçekleştirilirken bazı makro ekonomik göstergelerden yararlanılmıştır. Çalışmanın bir durum tespit araştırması olmasından hareketle anılan dönemin ilk yarısında gerek sosyal gerekse ekonomik gidişatın iyi olduğu izlenmiştir. Ancak dönemin ikinci yarısı itibariyle üstteki gelişmelerin tam anlamıyla sağlanabildiğini söylemek güçtür. Anahtar Kelimeler: Demokrat Parti, Sosyo-Ekonomik Politikalar, Siyasal Tarih, Adnan Menderes. SOCIO-ECONOMIC POLICIES APPLIED IN TURKEY BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 1950-1960
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's Islamists: from Power-Sharing to Political
    TURKEY’S ISLAMISTS: FROM POWER-SHARING TO POLITICAL INCUMBENCY The complex relationship between political Islam and the Turkish state – from political exclusion in the early Republican era, to power-sharing in the post-World War II multi-party era, to political incumbency in the 2000s – was crowned by AKP’s landslide electoral victory in 2002. The author debunks two myths regarding this relationship: first, that Kemalism enjoyed a monopoly of political power for decades and second, that Islamists achieved victory in 2002 after being the regime’s sole opposition. According to the author, Turkey’s failed Middle East policy can be attributed to AKP’s misconception that its Islamic counterparts would achieve power after the Arab uprisings just as they had done in Turkey in 2002. Behlül Özkan* Spring 2015 * Dr. Behlül Özkan is an Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science and International Relations at Marmara University, Istanbul. 71 VOLUME 14 NUMBER 1 BEHLÜL ÖZKAN he 1995 elections in Turkey, in which the Islamist Welfare Party (Refah Partisi) won the most votes, garnered much attention both in Turkey and abroad. Welfare Party leader Necmettin Erbakan took office as T prime minister the following year, the first time in the country’s histo- ry that an Islamist had occupied an executive position. Erbakan was subsequently forced out of office in the “post-modern coup” of 28 February 1997, widely inter- preted as a sign that achieving power by democratic means was still impossible for Islamists. Prominent Islamists such as current President and former Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan have often declared themselves to be the victims of the February 28 coup, which they cite as an instance of the perpetual repression faced by Islamists and their political constituencies since the founding of the Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 TEMMUZ BEYANNAMESİ'nin SİYASAL ETKİLERİ VE ÖNEMİ Siyasal Hayatımızda Çatışma Çözümüne Bir Başarı Örneğ
    Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü DergisiYıl: 2012/2, Sayı:16 Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social SciencesYear: 2012/2, Number:16 12 TEMMUZ BEYANNAMESİ’NİN SİYASAL ETKİLERİ VE ÖNEMİ Siyasal Hayatımızda Çatışma Çözümüne Bir Başarı Örneği Hüseyin ŞEYHANLIOĞLU ÖZET Türkiye, İkinci Dünya Savaşı’ndan sonra kurulan iki kutuplu dünya düzeninde Sovyetler Birliği’nden kaynaklanan tehdit, toplumsal değişim ihtiyacı, tek parti zihniyetinin sürdürülemezliği ve demokratik ülkeler safının ön şartı olarak altı ay içinde çok partili siyasal hayata geçmiştir. Ancak tek partinin otoriter politikacıları, kurumları ve bürokratları bir muhalefetin yaşamasını imkânsız hale getirmişti. Bu süreçte Cumhurbaşkanı İsmet İnönü, iktidar ve muhalefet partileri arasına tarafsız olarak girmiş ve muhalefetin de iktidar kadar yasal olduğunu belirten, 12 Temmuz Beyannamesi’ni yayımlamıştır. Bu makalenin amacı siyasi tarihimizde iktidar muhalefet ilişkilerinin kilitlendiği durumlara bir başarı örneği olarak gösterilen, 12 Temmuz Beyannamesi’nin önemini ve siyasal etkilerini analiz etmektir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi, Demokrat Parti, 12 Temmuz Beyannamesi, İsmet İnönü. THE POLITICAL EFFECTS AND IMPORTANCE OF TWELVE JULY DECLARATION A Success Example of Conflict Resolutıon In Our Political Life ABSTRACT Following World War II, Turkey’s transition into multy-party political life occured within six months, which is a pre-condition of democratic countries. However, single-party regime’s institutions, bureaucrats and politicians made it impossible for a real opposition to come true in a short time. President İsmet İnönü, mediated impartially between the ruling and opposition parties, and pointed out that the opposition also was as legitimate as the ruling power. The subject of this article is to analyze national and international dimensions of the declaration of 12 July 1947, which is regarded as an examplary of success in the situations when the ruling power and opposition relations were in a stalemate in our political life.
    [Show full text]
  • The False Promise [Of the 'Turkish Model']
    THE FALSE PROMISE Ahmet T. Kuru Since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, most Turks preserved the belief, beyond a simple expectation, that one day they would have ‘grandeur’ again. In fact, this was largely shared by some Western observers who regarded Turkey as a potential model for the coexistence of Islam and democracy. Almost a century after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, however, it would be fair to depict Turkey as a mediocre country, in terms of its military, economic, and socio-cultural capacities, and a competitive autocracy, regarding its political system. The promise of the Turkish case to combine the best parts of Islamic ethics and modern democratic institu- tions appeared to be false. What explains the failure of the idea of the ‘Turkish model?’ To simplify a complex story, one could define the competing groups in Turkish politics until 2012 as Kemalists and their discontents. For the former, it was the religious and multi-ethnic characteristics of the Ottoman Empire that led to its demise. The Turkish Republic, in contrast, had to be assertive secularist, and Turkish nationalist, to avoid repeating the maladies of the Ottoman ancien régime. This project required radical reforms, including the replacement of the Arabic alphabet with Latin, and an authoritarian regime, since the majority of Turks were conservative Muslims, and Kurds resisted assimilation. A major problem of the Kemalist understanding of Westernisation was its extreme formalism, probably due to the fact that Kemalism was primarily represented by the military. According to this formalist perspective, dress code and way of life defined the level of Westernisation of a person.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptionsjournal of International Affairs
    PERCEPTIONSJOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS PERCEPTIONS Winter 2014 Volume XIX Number 4 XIX Number 2014 Volume Winter PERCEPTIONS Locating Turkey as a ‘Rising Power’ in the Changing International Order: An Introduction Emel PARLAR DAL and Gonca OĞUZ GÖK Muslim Perceptions of Injustice as an International Relations Question Hasan KÖSEBALABAN Turkey’s Quest for a “New International Order”: The Discourse of Civilization and the Politics of Restoration Murat YEŞİLTAŞ Tracing the Shift in Turkey’s Normative Approach towards International Order through Debates in the UN Gonca OĞUZ GÖK On Turkey’s Trail as a “Rising Middle Power” in the Network of Global Governance: Preferences, Capabilities, and Strategies Emel PARLAR DAL Transformation Trajectory of the G20 and Turkey’s Presidency: Middle Powers in Global Governance Sadık ÜNAY Jordan and the Arab Spring: Challenges and Opportunities Nuri YEŞİLYURT Post-2014 Drawdown and Afghanistan’s Transition Challenges Saman ZULFQAR Tribute to Ali A. Mazrui M. Akif KAYAPINAR Winter 2014 Volume XIX - Number 4 ISSN 1300-8641 Style and Format PERCEPTIONS Articles submitted to the journal should be original contributions. If another version of the article is under consideration by another publication, or has been or will be published elsewhere, authors should clearly indicate this at the time of submission. Manuscripts should be submitted to: e-mail: [email protected] Editor in Chief The final decision on whether the manuscript is accepted for publication in the Journal or not is made by the Editorial Board depending on the anonymous referees’ review reports. Ali Resul Usul A standard length for PERCEPTIONS articles is 6,000 to 8,000 words including endnotes.
    [Show full text]
  • Yolsuzluk Ve Usulsüzlük Olaylarinin Türk Siyasetine Yansimalari (1923–1950)
    YOLSUZLUK VE USULSÜZLÜK OLAYLARININ TÜRK SİYASETİNE YANSIMALARI (1923–1950) Erkan AFŞAR Doktora Tezi Tarih Anabilim Dalı Prof. Dr. Selami KILIÇ 2013 Her Hakkı Saklıdır T.C. ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI Erkan AFŞAR YOLSUZLUK VE USULSÜZLÜK OLAYLARININ TÜRK SİYASETİNE YANSIMALARI (1923–1950) DOKTORA TEZİ TEZ YÖNETİCİSİ Prof. Dr. Selami KILIÇ ERZURUM–2013 I İÇİNDEKİLER ÖZET ............................................................................................................................... V ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................. VI ÖNSÖZ ......................................................................................................................... VII KISALTMALAR ........................................................................................................... X EKLER LİSTESİ ......................................................................................................... XI GİRİŞ ............................................................................................................................... 1 BİRİNCİ BÖLÜM TEK PARTİLİ DÖNEMDE YAPILAN YOLSUZLUK VE USULSÜZLÜKLER 1.1.BAHRİYE VEKİLİ İHSAN (ERYAVUZ) BEY DAVASI ( 1927–1928) ........ 23 1.1.1. İhsan Eryavuz’un Hayatı ............................................................................ 24 1.1.2. Bahriye Vekâletinin Kurulması .................................................................. 24 1.1.3. İsmet Paşa ile
    [Show full text]
  • Download Chapter
    PARTIES ESTABLISHED IN TURKEY AFTER 1960 AND THEIR ACTORS Assist. Prof. Dr. Mehmet Biçici Gaziantep University Introduction Organized structures formed in order to gain the authority to govern in a country by elections or to become partners in the administration of the country through coalition governments are called political parties (Gökçe, 2013). According to the political scientist Duverger’s evaluation of political parties, there are two main periods in the formation of political parties. In these two main periods, the background of the emergence and development of parties is taken into consideration. The first main period considers how the parties formed and under what conditions, while in the second main period, how the parties came to the present day after the World War II are examined (Göktürk, 2016). We can gather Party Political Systems under two headings. These are the two-party political system and the multi-party political system. In the two-party political system there are two major parties that are trusted to be elected by the people voting. Those who vote choose between these two parties, and the party that holds the majority wins power. 3. Parties are far from powerful in this election. The best known examples of the two-party political systems are seen in the United States and England. The candidates for power in these countries have two large majorities. Other smaller parties are unable to be in power because they cannot get close to the big two parties. Examples include the Republican Party and the Democratic Party in the US, and the Labor Party and the Conservative Party in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • İzmir Adnan Menderes Airport Brochure
    ADB İzmir Adnan Menderes Airport IZMIR’S BACKGROUND 4.1 million people reside in Izmir and it is the 3rd most populous city in Turkey. Also referred as the “Pearl of the Aegean”, Izmir is a tourist destination located at the Aegean coast of Turkey and is well-known for its historical sites, beautiful beaches and holiday resorts. The city attracts 1.2 million foreign visitors each year thanks to the numerous tourist attractions in and around. Hosting one of the biggest ports in Turkey, Izmir also has a significant amount of trade volume. TAV Airports built brand new international and domestic terminals for Izmir Adnan Menderes (ADB) in order to expand the capacity and accommodate the increasing air transport demand to/from the city. Operator of 14 airports worldwide, TAV Airports assists the airlines and tour operators to grow their business in Izmir through its regional experience and know-how. ADB IZMIR OFFERS THE BEST OF THE AEGEAN Izmir is well-known for its historical areas, beautiful beaches and holiday resorts. Izmir Adnan Menderes Airport (ADB) is the most convenient entry point to the Aegean region for the visitors. The city is closely located to major touristic districts such as Çeşme, Selçuk and Kuşadası. Its massive tourism makes Izmir a lively city. The House of the Virgin Mary, located near Ephesus in Selçuk, is a holly place for Christians and visited by more than half a million people every year. The tourism development plans of the Government regarding Izmir and its vicinity reveals that the bed capacity of the region will be increased from 40,000 to 100,000 by 2023.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Who in Politics in Turkey
    WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY Sarıdemir Mah. Ragıp Gümüşpala Cad. No: 10 34134 Eminönü/İstanbul Tel: (0212) 522 02 02 - Faks: (0212) 513 54 00 www.tarihvakfi.org.tr - [email protected] © Tarih Vakfı Yayınları, 2019 WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY PROJECT Project Coordinators İsmet Akça, Barış Alp Özden Editors İsmet Akça, Barış Alp Özden Authors Süreyya Algül, Aslı Aydemir, Gökhan Demir, Ali Yalçın Göymen, Erhan Keleşoğlu, Canan Özbey, Baran Alp Uncu Translation Bilge Güler Proofreading in English Mark David Wyers Book Design Aşkın Yücel Seçkin Cover Design Aşkın Yücel Seçkin Printing Yıkılmazlar Basın Yayın Prom. ve Kağıt San. Tic. Ltd. Şti. Evren Mahallesi, Gülbahar Cd. 62/C, 34212 Bağcılar/İstanbull Tel: (0212) 630 64 73 Registered Publisher: 12102 Registered Printer: 11965 First Edition: İstanbul, 2019 ISBN Who’s Who in Politics in Turkey Project has been carried out with the coordination by the History Foundation and the contribution of Heinrich Böll Foundation Turkey Representation. WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY —EDITORS İSMET AKÇA - BARIŞ ALP ÖZDEN AUTHORS SÜREYYA ALGÜL - ASLI AYDEMİR - GÖKHAN DEMİR ALİ YALÇIN GÖYMEN - ERHAN KELEŞOĞLU CANAN ÖZBEY - BARAN ALP UNCU TARİH VAKFI YAYINLARI Table of Contents i Foreword 1 Abdi İpekçi 3 Abdülkadir Aksu 6 Abdullah Çatlı 8 Abdullah Gül 11 Abdullah Öcalan 14 Abdüllatif Şener 16 Adnan Menderes 19 Ahmet Altan 21 Ahmet Davutoğlu 24 Ahmet Necdet Sezer 26 Ahmet Şık 28 Ahmet Taner Kışlalı 30 Ahmet Türk 32 Akın Birdal 34 Alaattin Çakıcı 36 Ali Babacan 38 Alparslan Türkeş 41 Arzu Çerkezoğlu
    [Show full text]
  • The Peace Conference of Lausanne (1922-1923)
    Bern 1923 - 2008 With the kind support of: Mrs Ionna Ertegiin Mrs Selma Goksel Tiirkiye I~ Bankasi Anadolu Ajans1 Thanks to: Onur Ozc;:eri (Research, text and layout) Agathon Aerni (research) Tuluy Tanc;: (editing) © Embassy of Turkey, Bern 85 years of representation of the Republic of Turkey in Switzerland (1923-2008) The Embassy of the Republic of Turkey, Bern ~u6tic offJ'urk,ey rrfie (Jlresufent It is no coincidence that the Republic of Turkey purchased its first Embassy premises abroad, in Switzerland's capital, Bern, to establish the seat of its diplomatic representation. The negotiation of a peace treaty and its successful outcome took the shape of the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923. The Treaty of Lausanne left an indelible mark in our memory. The aspiration of the Turkish nation to live as a free and independent people is thus anchored in Switzerland, a land that earned the reputation for fairness, equity and justice. The subsequent adoption in 1926 of a Civil Code based on the Swiss example, the Montreux Convention negotiated in 1936 in Switzerland giving full sovereignty on the Turkish Straits and other events have solidified this perception. I am therefore particularly pleased that the roots of the friendship bonds between Turkey and Switzerland and the main events associating Switzerland to Turkey have been compiled in a book. The book also illustrates the reciprocal attention and like minded approaches of both Turkey and Switzerland to further promote bilateral relations between two democracies and to facilitate the realization of aspirations of peace. I would like to express my thanks to the President of the Swiss Confederation, His Excellency Pascal Couchepin and to all who have contributed to the realization of this book.
    [Show full text]