DOCSLIB.ORG

Monitoring Explosive Violence in 2014 Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monitoring Explosive Violence in 2014 Contents ExplosivE sTATEs Monitoring explosive violence in 2014 Contents Introduction 1 Key Findings 3 Key Terms 7 2014 Overview 9 Incidents of explosive violence recorded by AOAV in 2014 13 Explosive weapons in populated areas 16 Explosive Weapons Types 20 Report by Air-launched explosive weapons 21 Jane Hunter and Robert Perkins Editor Ground-launched explosive weapons 25 Iain Overton With thanks to Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) 30 Saara Jaffrey-Roberts, Steve Smith, Claudia Xavier-Bonifay © Copyright Action on Armed Violence (May 2015) Conclusion 34 Cover illustration Men run from an explosion after an Israeli air strike hits a house in Gaza City, © Recommendations 35 23 August 2014. ( Roberto Schmidt/AFP/Getty Images) Infographics Methodology 36 Sarah Leo Design and printing Notes 38 Tutaev Design Clarifications or corrections from interested parties are welcome. Research and publication funded by the Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 1 | ACTION ON ARMED VIOLENCE MONITORING EXPLOSIVE VIOLENCE 2014 | 2 Introduction Crucially, AOAV’s data can only ever show part of the suffering to civilians across the world. Explosive Ultimately, civilians in Syria, Gaza, Israel, Afghanistan, Libya, eastern Ukraine picture of this civilian harm. It tries to capture some of States shows the urgent need for action to combat the immediate effects; the deaths and the physical in- and reduce the harm these weapons continue to and other conflict hotspots pay the price when the shells aimed at military juries. It cannot touch upon the destruction of homes cause. targets end up hitting homes, hospitals and schools. This simply has to stop. or a lifetime of possessions. It cannot understand the These explosive weapons are designed for open battlefields, not built-up psychological suffering inflicted, or the life-changing urban areas […] This is not about the weapons themselves – it’s about where economic deprivation that can follow an explosive. Many more people are affected by explosive weapons and how they are used. It took 40 minutes but it felt a life- than can possibly be hinted at in these casualty figures.3 ICRC President1 Peter Maurer, time. I lived all my life in the house October 2014 AOAV’s data is not an attempt to capture every casualty my father built. It was our corner of of every incident around the world. No claims are made paradise, our ‘swallow’s nest’. Now For four years AOAV has tracked the use of explosive One consistent pattern endures throughout the years that this sample of data, taken from English-language it is destroyed. I’ve no idea what weapons around the world. Since 2011, almost 150,000 AOAV has been tracking explosive violence. When media reporting, can represent the total impact of will come next. people have been reported killed or injured by weapons these weapons are used in populated areas, they explosive weapons on civilians in 2014. Lyuda, like‘‘ rockets, mortars and car bombs. massively elevate the threat to civilians. Even when resident of Luhansk, eastern Ukraine, explosive weapons were targeted at a military objec- The last twelve months have seen explosive weapons, 2 August 2014 Year on year, the casualty toll has mounted with 2014 tive in 2014, their wide-area effect often meant that both manufactured and improvised, bring appalling being the worst that AOAV has recorded so far. bystanders were caught by the blast or hit by pro- Civilian casualties from explosive weapons are now jected fragments. The grim reality is that civilians in 52%higher than 2011 levels. countries around the world cannot feel safe even in their own homes. ‘‘ Explosive violence worsened in its spread and severity in 2014. Civilian deaths and injuries from these weapons Explosive weapons: increased by 5% from 2013. Every day in 2014 there Weapons that share common characteristics was an average of 90 civilian casualties, including 29 causing deaths, injuries, and damage by project- civilians who died daily at the hands of these weapons. ing explosive blast, heat and often fragmentation around a point of detonation. These weapons in- Civilians continue to bear the burden of explosive clude a variety of munitions such as air-dropped violence. In total AOAV recorded 41,847 deaths bombs, mortars, improvised explosive devices and injuries in 2014, 78% of whom were civilians. (IEDs) and artillery shells. Civilians were killed and wounded as they slept, shopped, worshipped or travelled. The wide-area effects of some explosive weapons In Explosive States, AOAV explores the countries and have been of concerning prominence in 2014. Multiple contexts where civilians were most at risk from the rocket launchers, a devastating feature of the Syrian use of explosive weapons. More than 50 different war in previous years, were used by competing parties countries saw casualties last year, places as diverse to pummel eastern villages and towns in Ukraine. These as Ukraine, India and the Central African Republic. weapons, like the notorious Grad, launch a barrage of unguided munitions in the space of seconds, covering For the second year running, Iraq and Syria were the a wide area. two countries with the highest numbers of civilian casu- alties from explosive violence. The suffering of civilians They clearly have no place being used in places where in these countries was compounded by new crises in civilians are concentrated. Yet they, and other equally 2014. Desperate humanitarian emergencies have emer- terrible weaponry, were often the drivers of civilian ged from the widespread use of explosive weapons harm in markets, schools, neighbourhoods and places Remnant of a direct-fire rocket-assisted projectile outside Fallujah General Hospital in Anbar Province, Iraq, 13 January 2014 in populated areas in Gaza, Ukraine and Nigeria. of worship in 2014. (Human Rights Watch, © private) 3 | ACTION ON ARMED VIOLENCE MONITORING EXPLOSIVE VIOLENCE 2014 | 4 Key findings ovErviEw • Over 10,000 civilian casualties popUlATED ArEAs Ground-launched explosive weapons from explosive weapons were • In 2014, 92% of casualties in populated areas • Ground-launched explosive weapons were were reported as civilians. This is compared responsible for 8,088 civilian casualties in There was a 5% rise in the recorded in Iraq for the second to 34% in other areas. 2014 (25% of the total recorded). number of civilian casualties year running. and an 11% rise in incidents • On average 16 people were killed or injured • 90% of casualties were civilians. This is higher Seven countries and territories in every incident of explosive weapon use in than the proportion recorded from IED attacks involving explosive weapons • populated areas. In other areas in 2014 the (85%), and aerial attacks (61%). in 2014 compared to 2013. had over 1,000 civilian deaths average number was four. and injuries in 2014. In 2013 • Mortars caused 3,000 civilian casualties in 15 there were five such countries. • Markets saw 4,245 civilian casualties in 2014, countries. This is a 53% increase from 2013. • AOAV recorded 41,847 casual- a 15% increase from 2013. ties (people who were killed or • Six civilians were killed on average per attack injured) by explosive weapons • Gaza, Ukraine and Nigeria saw • Child casualties of explosive weapons were with multiple rocket launchers in Ukraine. in 2,702 incidents in 2014. In the biggest increases in civilian reported in 28 countries and territories in 2014. iEDs 2013, AOAV had recorded casualties from explosive ExplosivE wEApon TypEs • IEDs were responsible for 17,098 civilian 37,809 casualties from 2,430 weapons. casualties, 52% of the total recorded in 2014. incidents. Air-launched explosive weapons Air-launched explosive weapons were respon- 85% of those killed and injured by IEDs were Incidents were recorded in 58 • • • sible for 18% of recorded civilian casualties civilians. countries and territories around • Civilian casualties rose by 5% (5,868 civilian deaths and injuries). in 2014 from 2013. This is the the world. • There was a 26% decrease in the number of third consecutive year in which • Civilian casualties from aerial explosive weapons civilian casualties caused by IEDs compared Civilian casualties from aerial in 2014 almost tripled from 2013 levels (when to 2013 (17,098 down from 22,829). recorded civilian casualties • 2,012 deaths and injuries were recorded). explosive weapons in 2014 al- of explosive violence have • Three of the five deadliest IED attacks in 2014 increased. most tripled from 2013 levels. • 17 countries and territories saw casualties in took place in Nigeria. 2014. Almost half (43%) of civilian casualties from air-launched explosive weapons were in State use of explosive weapons • Of the casualties recorded • Syria, and 35% were in Gaza. in 2014, 78% were civilians increased significantly in 2014. AOAV recorded almost twice as many civilian (32,662 civilians killed and While responsibility cannot be • casualties from barrel bombs in 2014 as in 2013. injured). assigned in many cases, where it was reported states caused • Iraq, Syria, Gaza, Nigeria and 28% of recorded civilian casual- Pakistan saw the highest num- ties in 2014, up from 11% in 4 bers of civilian casualties in 2014. 2013. EXPLOSIVEEXPLOSIVE VIOLENCE IN 2014 20142014 20132013 101-700 INCIDENTS 78% 51-100 INCIDENTS CIVILIAN CASUALTIESCCASUASUALLTIESTIES +5% 29 11–50 INCIDENTS 58 TOTALTOTTALAL REPORTEDREPORRTEDTEDD CASUALTIES:CCASUASUALLTIES:TIES: 41,847 INCREASE IN TOTALTOTTALAL CIVILIAN AVERAGEAAVERAVERAGE NUMBER OF CIVILIAN 2–10 INCIDENTS NUMBER OF COUNTRIESCOUNTRIES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultural Heritage Is the Physical Manifestation of a People's History
    Witnessing Heritage Destruction in Syria and Iraq Cultural heritage is the physical manifestation of a people’s history and forms a significant part of their identity. Unfortunately, the destruction of that heritage has become an ongoing part of the conflict in Syria and Iraq. With the rise of ISIS and the increase of political instability, important cultural sites and irreplaceable collections are now at risk in these countries and across the region. Mass murder, systematic terror, and forced resettlement have always been tools of ethnic and sectarian cleansing. But events in Syria and Iraq remind us that the erasure of cultural heritage, Map of Syria and Iraq which removes all traces of a people from the landscape, is part of the same violent process. Understanding this loss and responding to it remain a challenge for us all. Exhibit credits: Smithsonian Institution University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology American Association for the Advancement of Science U.S. Committee of the Blue Shield A Syrian inspects a damaged mosque following bomb attacks by Assad regime forces in the opposition-controlled al-Shaar neighborhood of Aleppo, Syria, on September 21, 2015. Conflict in Syria and Iraq (Photo by Ibrahim Ebu Leys/Anadolu Agency/ Getty Images) Recent violence in Syria and Iraq has shattered daily life, leaving over 250,000 people dead and over 12 million displaced. Beginning in 2011, civil protests in Damascus and Daraa against the Assad government were met with a severe crackdown, leading to a civil war and creating a power vacuum within which terror groups like ISIS have flourished.
    [Show full text]
  • Displaced Loyalties: the Effects of Indiscriminate Violence on Attitudes Among Syrian Refugees in Turkey
    Displaced Loyalties: The Effects of Indiscriminate Violence on Attitudes Among Syrian Refugees in Turkey Kristin Fabbe Chad Hazlett Tolga Sinmazdemir Working Paper 18-024 Displaced Loyalties: The Effects of Indiscriminate Violence on Attitudes Among Syrian Refugees in Turkey Kristin Fabbe Harvard Business School Chad Hazlett UCLA Tolga Sinmazdemir Bogazici University Working Paper 18-024 Copyright © 2017 by Kristin Fabbe, Chad Hazlett, and Tolga Sinmazdemir Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Displaced Loyalties: The Effects of Indiscriminate Violence on Attitudes Among Syrian Refugees in Turkey Kristin Fabbe,∗ Chad Hazlett,y & Tolga Sınmazdemirz December 8, 2017 Abstract How does violence during conflict affect the political attitudes of civilians who leave the conflict zone? Using a survey of 1,384 Syrian refugees in Turkey, we employ a natural experiment owing to the inaccuracy of barrel bombs to examine the effect of having one's home destroyed on political and community loyalties. We find that refugees who lose a home to barrel bombing, while more likely to feel threatened by the Assad regime, are less supportive of the opposition, and instead more likely to say no armed group in the conflict represents them { opposite to what is expected when civilians are captive in the conflict zone and must choose sides for their protection. Respondents also show heightened volunteership towards fellow refugees. Altogether, this suggests that when civilians flee the conflict zone, they withdraw support from all armed groups rather than choosing sides, instead showing solidarity with their civilian community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reverberating Effects of Explosive Weapon Use in Syria Contents
    THE REVERBERATING EFFECTS OF EXPLOSIVE WEAPON USE IN SYRIA CONTENTS Introduction 4 1.1 Timeline 6 1.2 Worst locations 8 1.3 Weapon types 11 1.4 Actors 12 Health 14 Economy 19 Environment 24 Society and Culture 30 Conclusion 36 Recommendations 37 Report by Jennifer Dathan Notes 38 Additional research by Silvia Ffiore, Leo San Laureano, Juliana Suess and George Yaolong Editor Iain Overton Copyright © Action on Armed Violence (January 2019) Cover illustration Syrian children play outside their home in Gaziantep, Turkey by Jennifer Dathan Design and printing Tutaev Design Clarifications or corrections from interested parties are welcome Research and publication funded by the Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs 4 | ACTION ON ARMED VIOLENCE REVERBERATING EFFECTS OF EXPLOSIVE WEAPONS IN SYRIA | 5 INTRODUCTION The use of explosive weapons, particularly in populated noticed the following year that, whilst total civilian families from both returning to their homes and using areas, causes wide-spread and long-term harm to casualties (deaths and injuries) were just below that their land. Such impact has devastating and lingering civilians. Action on Armed Violence (AOAV) has been of the previous year, civilian deaths had increased by consequences for communities and cultures. monitoring casualties from the use of explosive 50% (from 5,639 in 2016 to 8,463 in 2017). As the war weapons around the globe since 2010. So extreme continued, injuries were increasingly less likely to be In this report, AOAV seeks to better understand the has such harm been in Syria in recent years that, recorded - particularly in incidents where there were reverberating harms from the explosive violence in by the end of 2017, Syria had overtaken Iraq as the high levels of civilian deaths.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution in Military Affairs in the Battlespace of Syria and Iraq
    P. MARTON DOI: 10.14267/cojourn.2017v2n2a3 COJOURN 2:2-3 (2017) Evolution in military affairs in the battlespace of Syria and Iraq Péter Marton1 Abstract This paper will consider developments in the Syrian and Iraqi battlespaces that may be conceptualised as relevant to the broader evolution in military affairs. A brief discussion of different notions of „revolution" and „evolution” (in Military Affairs) will be offered, followed by an overview of the combatant actors involved in engagements in the battlespace concerned. The analysis distinguishes at the start between two different evolutionary processes: one specific to the local theatre of war in which local combatants, heavily constrained by their circumstances and limitations, show innovation with limited resources and means, and with very high (existential) stakes. This actually existential evolutionary process is complicated by the effects of the only quasi-evolutionary process of major powers’ interactions (with each other and with local combatants). The latter process is quasi-evolutionary in the sense that it does not carry direct existential stakes for the central players involved in it. The stakes are in a sense virtual: being a function of the prospects of imagined peer-competitor military conflict. Key cases studied in the course of the discussion include (inter alia) the evolution of the Syrian Arab Air Force's use of so-called barrel bombs as well as the use of land-attack cruise missiles and other high-end weaponry by major intervening powers. Keywords: RMA, warfare, militaries, tactics, strategy, Syria, Iraq Introduction: Evolution in military affairs Evolution, in the case of more complex organisms, is the combined effect of genetic re- combination and natural selection that results in the adaptation of different species to their 1 Péter Marton is Associate Professor at Corvinus University’s Institute of International Studies, and Editor- in-Chief of COJOURN.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sudan Consortium the Impact of Sudanese Military Operations On
    The Sudan Consortium African and International Civil Society Action for Sudan The impact of Sudanese military operations on the civilian population of Southern Kordofan1 April 2014 The Sudan Consortium works with a trusted group of local Sudanese partners who have been working on the ground in Southern Kordofan since the current conflict began in late 2011. All the attacks referred to in this report were launched against areas where there was no military presence and which were clearly identifiable as civilian in character. We believe that this information provides strong circumstantial evidence that civilians are being directly and deliberately targeted by the Sudanese armed forces in Southern Kordofan. In the last week of April, large numbers of civilians were reported to have been displaced from their homes in Delami County, South Kordofan as a result of a major new military offensive launched in Southern Kordofan by the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF). Although exact numbers are difficult to establish, partners have cited estimates between 45,000 and 70,000. The government offensive in Southern Kordofan appears to have been concentrated on Rashad, Al Abisseya and Delami counties in the north-east of Southern Kordofan. The situation on the ground remains fluid and information from Rashad and Al Abisseya counties has been difficult to obtain. However the Sudan Consortium’s partners on the ground have been able to report firsthand on the situation in Delami County and have interviewed internally displaced persons (IDPs) fleeing from the fighting further north. From 12 April onwards, several locations in Delami County, notably Aberi, Mardis and Sarafyi, were subject to heavy bombardment on a daily basis by artillery and multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS) deployed by the Sudanese Armed Forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Menu of Indicators to Measure the Reverberating Effects on Civilians from the Use of Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas
    REFERENCE FRAMEWORK: MENU OF INDICATORS TO MEASURE THE REVERBERATING EFFECTS ON CIVILIANS FROM THE USE OF EXPLOSIVE WEAPONS IN POPULATED AREAS CHRISTINA WILLE & ALFREDO MALARET BALDO VERSION 1 ABOUT UNIDIR This reference framework should be considered a working document subject to changes, The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) is a voluntarily additions, editions and corrections. The authors may revise and correct the text, without funded, autonomous institute within the United Nations. One of the few policy announcing the edits or issuing a formal erratum. As such, users are encouraged to use the most institutes worldwide focusing on disarmament, UNIDIR generates knowledge and updated version of this research framework, as posted on the unidir.org site. promotes dialogue and action on disarmament and security. Based in Geneva, UNIDIR UNIDIR welcomes and encourages all feedback on improving the present menu of indicators and assists the international community to develop the practical, innovative ideas needed building on it for future iterations. This is a UNIDIR Tool, designed to contribute to ongoing efforts to find solutions to critical security problems. to protect civilians in conflict and attain the Sustainable Development Goals. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Please share comments and feedback with [email protected]. Support from UNIDIR core funders provides the foundation for all the Institute’s unidir.org | © UNIDIR 2020 activities. This research area of the Conventional Arms Programme is supported by For best viewing: go to View > Page Display > Two Page View the Government of Germany. CONTRIBUTORS This research framework recognizes the important work of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Insecurity Insight, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, and the World Health Organization, on which this product is grounded.
    [Show full text]
  • About Syrians for Truth and Justice/STJ
    About Syrians for Truth and Justice/STJ Syrians for Truth and Justice /STJ is a nonprofit, nongovernmental, independent Syrian organization. STJ includes many defenders and human rights defenders from Syria and from different backgrounds and affiliations, including academics of other nationalities. The organization works for Syria, where all Syrians, without discrimination, should be accorded dignity, justice and equal human rights. 1 Repeated Attacks with Incendiary Weapons, Cluster Munitions and Chemicals on Eastern Ghouta A Flash Report Documenting the events of 7 March 2018 in Hamoryah and those of 10 and 11 March 2018 in Irbin 2 Introduction Syrian regular forces and their allies continued their heaviest military campaign1 on Eastern Ghouta cities and towns, using various types of weapons, such as rocket launchers “Smerch type”, barrel bombs, guided missiles and incendiary weapons. As on March 7, 2018, the city of Hamoryah2 witnessed a bloody day (following adoption of Security Council Resolution No. 2401), where it was shelled with weapons loaded with incendiary substances, similar to phosphorous, and napalm-like substances. This was accompanied with targeting Hamoryah with a barrel bomb, loaded with toxic gas, dropped by a helicopter on the road between Saqba town and Hamoryah, as confirmed by the field researcher of Syrians for Truth and Justice/STJ. As well as targeting the city with a rocket loaded with cluster munitions the same day. This intensive shelling killed at least 29 civilians, two of whom were burnt to death with incendiary substances, and caused suffocation to scores of civilians as a result of using toxic gas besides the outbreak of fires in residential buildings The hysterical shelling hasn’t spared the city of Irbin3, which was targeted by chemical weapons loaded with incendiary substances similar to phosphorus and others loaded with napalm-like substances, on 10 and 11 March 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism in Afghanistan: a Joint Threat Assessment
    Terrorism in Afghanistan: A Joint Threat Assessment Terrorism in Afghanistan: A Joint Threat Assessment Introduction 7 Chapter I: Afghanistan’s Security Situation and Peace Process: Comparing U.S. and Russian Perspectives (Barnett R. Rubin) 9 Chapter II: Militant Terrorist Groups in, and Connected to, Afghanistan (Ekaterina Stepanova and Javid Ahmad) 24 Chapter III: Afghanistan in the Regional Security Interplay Context (Andrey Kazantsev and Thomas F. Lynch III) 41 Major Findings and Conclusions 67 Appendix A: Protecting Afghanistan’s Borders: U.S. and Russia to Lead in a Regional Counterterrorism Effort (George Gavrilis) 72 Appendix B: Arms Supplies for Afghan Militants and Terrorists (Vadim Kozyulin) 75 Appendix C: Terrorism Financing: Understanding Afghanistan’s Specifics (Konstantin Sorokin and Vladimir Ivanov) 79 Acronyms 83 Terrorism in Afghanistan Joint U.S.-Russia Working Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan Working Group Experts: Javid Ahmad1 Senior Fellow, Atlantic Council Sher Jan Ahmadzai Director, Center for Afghanistan Studies, University of Nebraska at Omaha Robert Finn Former Ambassador of the United States to Afghanistan George Gavrilis Fellow, Center for Democracy, Toleration, and Religion, University of California, Berkeley Andrey Kazantsev Director, Center for Central Asian and Afghan Studies, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University) Kirill Koktysh Associate Professor, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University) Member, Expert Council, State Duma Committee of Nationalities Mikhail Konarovsky Former Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Afghanistan Col. (Ret.) Oleg V. Kulakov* Professor of Area Studies, Military University, Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation Vadim Kozyulin Member, PIR Center Executive Board Researcher, Diplomatic Academy, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Thomas F.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Gender-Based Violence Through Arms Control: Tools And
    PREVENTING GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE THROUGH ARMS CONTROL Tools and guidelines to implement the Arms Trade Treaty and UN Programme of Action © 2016 Reaching Critical Will of the Women’s International Thanks to Maria Butler, Mia Gandenberger, María Muñoz League for Peace and Freedom Maraver, and Sofia Tuvestad for reviewing this paper and providing comments and suggestions. APRIL 2016 PREVENTING GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE THROUGH Thanks to Christer Ahlström, Emma Bjertén-Günther, Mark ARMS CONTROL - Tools and guidelines to implement the Bromley, Dongmo Feugap, Hardy Giezendanner, Maribel Arms Trade Treaty and UN Programme of Action Hernández, Paul Holtom, Martin Krueger, Justine Kwachu, Manuel Martínez, Patrick McCarthy, Ramon Muro Martinez, 1st edition Jasmin Nario-Galace, Sarah Parker, Cédric Poitevin, Martha 68 pp. Quintero, Mike Reilly, Katherine Ronderos, Nauris Rumpe, Rachel Stohl, Leonard Tettey, Faman A. Toure, and Stelios Permission is granted for non-commercial reproduction, Zachariou for taking the time to answer questions and copying, distribution, and transmission of this publication or provide information and assistance, Also, thank you to Marc parts thereof so long as full credit is given to the coordinating Finaud of the Geneva Center for Security Policy for providing project and organization, editor, and relevant authors; the information and assistance during the preparatory process. text is not altered, transformed, or built upon; and for any reuse or distribution, these terms are made clear to others. Written by Rebecca Gerome
    [Show full text]
  • The Syrian Regime Has Dropped Nearly 70,000 Barrel Bombs on Syria the Ruthless Bombing
    The Syrian Regime Has Dropped Nearly 70,000 Barrel Bombs on Syria The Ruthless Bombing Monday, December 25, 2017 1 snhr [email protected] www.sn4hr.org The Syrian Network for Human Rights (SNHR), founded in June 2011, is a non-governmental, independent group that is considered a primary source for the OHCHR on all death toll-related analyses in Syria. Report Contents I. Introduction and Methodology II. What are Barrel Bombs? III. Indiscriminate Barrel Bomb Attacks in Context of Military Progression IV. Use of Barrel Bombs before and after Security Council Resolution 2139 V. Use of Barrel Bombs since July 2012 VI. Most Notable Incidents of Barrel Bomb Use VII. Conclusions and Recommendations I. Introduction and Methodology The use of barrel bombs, which are dropped by the Syrian regime army from their heli- copters or fixed-wing warplanes, manifest one of the most appalling ways in which the international community has blatantly let down the Syrian people as these barrel bombs have been forgotten almost completely in the last year with no condemnations to be heard about the repeated use of this barbarian type of weapons which is a disgrace for any army in the modern world seeing that dropping a barrel loaded with explosive objects from an altitude as high as 5,000 meters rely mainly on the principle of free falling and air currents. This strategy should have been condemned by military men from around the world. Using this rudimentary weapon against civilians in this repeated fashion fully reflects the unprec- edented degeneration that the army institution of the ruling regime has fallen into just to kill and exterminate the Syrian people.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraqi Government Accused of Barrel Bombing ISIS-Held Falluja
    2 July 10, 2015 News & Analysis Iraq Iraqi government accused of barrel bombing ISIS-held Falluja Omar Hejab a city block, constitutes a war crime. Falluja residents said barrel Baghdad bombs were dropped there after Iraqi lawmaker Qassem al-Aaraji he Iraqi Air Force dropped labelled the city the “head of deadly barrel bombs on the snake”. He told parliament the Islamic State-held city on June 2nd, “All the population of Falluja, killing dozens there is affiliated with ISIS (an Is- of people and wounding lamic State acronym) and should Tmore than 200, Sunni tribal leaders, be wiped out totally.” residents and medical officials said. According to YouTube videos Medical officials at a Falluja posted by activists, the Shia-dom- hospital said at least 79 people, inated Iraqi government has used including 20 children and nine barrel bombs against several cit- women, were killed, and 212 oth- ies in its war against ISIS, which ers wounded in barrel bomb at- controls about one-third of the tacks that began June 18th and country. Mosul, Taiji and Tikrit, all continued through early July. battlefronts in the war against ISIS The makeshift bombs — oil since mid-2014, have been hit sev- drums packed with explosives and eral times. shrapnel — have killed or wounded Activists say the home-made thousands of Syrians since the em- bombs are usually dropped at battled regime of President Bashar night to evade being recorded on Assad began using them in 2012. video. Iraq’s Shia paramilitaries launch a rocket towards Islamic State militants north of Falluja in Anbar On June 1st, Sunni tribal lead- province, July 6, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Barrel Bombs and Indiscriminate Bombardment in Syria: the Need to Strengthen Compliance with International Humanitarian Law
    The use of barrel bombs and indiscriminate bombardment in Syria: the need to strengthen compliance with international humanitarian law Statement by Mr. Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro Chair of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic Presented at a side event hosted by the Permanent Mission of Austria and Article 36 Geneva, 12 March 2015 Mr. Ambassador, Distinguished Members of the panel, Ladies and Gentlemen, Since 2012, indiscriminate and disproportionate bombardments have been the primary cause of civilian casualties and mass displacement in the Syrian Arab Republic. A significant portion of documented civilian casualties have resulted from the use of explosive devices against targets located within densely populated areas. According to NGOs working on documentation, casualties from aerial strikes, ground shelling and explosions count for over 50% of total documented deaths in 2014, a substantial part of which are caused by barrel bombs. Indiscriminate bombardments have also damaged homes, medical facilities, schools, water and electrical facilities, bakeries and crops. In many cases, shelling was conducted in support of on-going sieges imposed on restive localities and neighbourhoods, in particular by State forces in areas like Yarmouk camp in Damascus and Al-Waer neighbourhood in Homs city. Despite their largely different scales of involvement, all parties to the Syrian civil war, with no exception, have used heavy weaponry in their possession to target populated areas leading to civilian casualties. It is partly due to the fact that most active frontlines have been located inside urban centres where fighters of all belligerents have continued to operate among civilians, putting their lives at risk.
    [Show full text]