DOCSLIB.ORG

Maneerut Anulomsombat, Senior Associate – Investment Banking, the Quant Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maneerut Anulomsombat, Senior Associate – Investment Banking, the Quant Group Maneerut Anulomsombat, Senior Associate – Investment Banking, The Quant Group. [email protected] Maneerut is a Senior Associate Director at The Quant Group – Investment Banking, she graduated magna cum laude in Industrial Engineering from Chulalongkorn University and an MBA from Stanford University. May 2008 Smackdown - The Fight for Financial Hegemony Last night I switched on the cable and World Wrestling Championship was on. I’ve never really watched wrestling before but for the five minutes that I did, it seemed like the fight was between two greasy large muscular male slamming their heads at each other surrealistically and theatrically slapstick. Amidst this fight another large muscular male came out from backstage, jumped into the ring and dropped-kick one wrestler who fell off the stage then turned around and slammed the other wrestler while the referee bounced around the ring ineffectively. Apparently this is a common scene on “Smackdown”. I don’t know what it is exactly but this made me think about the fights for the hegemony in global deal-making between the three giants: Private Equity Funds (PE), Hedge Funds (HF), and Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWF). And while the authorities and senate banking committees don’t always wear striped black and white referee shirts, they seem to be bouncing around not quite certain what to do as well. And here's how the giants compare by size. The Asset Under Management (AUM) of PE by the end of year 2007 was around US$1.16 trillion. The AUM of SWFs rose from US$500 Million in 1990 to US$3.3 trillion in 2007, overshadowing the US$1.7 trillion of AUM thought to be managed by HFs in year 2007 (up from $490 billion in year 2000). Private Equity Funds PEs, the smallest amongst them, however, have gotten a larger share of the headlines. This is largly due to their role in corporate takeovers. In Year 2006, PEs accounted for about one-third of US M&A and almost 20% in Europe by deal value. In 1989, the takeover of RJR Nabisco by KKR held the record as the largest Leveraged BuyOut (LBO) for more than 15 years. The record was broken in 2006 by the HCA LBO for $33 billion by three Private Equity firms Bain Capital, KKR and Merrill Lynch. Several mega deals poured out after the HCA LBO such as Equity Office for $39 billion by The Blackstone Group and then TXU for $45 billion by KKR and TPG Capital including Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley. Soonafter Ontario's Pension Funds, Proividence Equity Partners, and AIG [check facts] clubbed what is still the largest LBO to date of BCE (the holding company to Bell Canada) at US$49 billion. Since the back half of 2007, deals have slowed across the board amidst ubiquitous credit-defaults in response to the collapse of the US sub-prime market. As well, 2008 has so far been slow. Carlyle's senior partner, David Rubenstein, voiced that PEs will likely see lower returns in the years to come as it wrestles with a tougher debt market. The Cov- Lite (uncollateralized with limited covenants) debt market has completely dried up for LBO financings. Hedge Funds Hedge Funds differ from their Private Equity brethrens in that they apply multii- faceted active trading strategies and much of their fabric involve public market securities, commodities, and currencies and therefore not limited to equity of the private kind. HFs are more apt to employ quick flips while PEs have more dfinitive holding periods typically 4-6 years and are more concerned on corporate governance and the ability to control the companies. The Hedge Funds have been expanding rapidly in the past couple of years, with more than 10,000 funds managing some US$1.87 trillion in assets by early 2008. Though deal sizes or positions held by Hedge Funds may not be as big as those of SWFs and PEs, their aggregate trades in a year are manifolds larger than PEs'. In 2006, HF trades account for 30% - 60% of trading volumes in US and UK equity and debt markets. In the past year, Hedge Funds in aggregate have lost multiple of billion dollars in large part triggered by the subprime crisis. Bear Stearns began with the wind-downs of their two hedge funds (Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Fund and Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Enhanced Leveraged Fund) and finally folded itself into J.P. Morgan. Och-Ziff experienced declines in value in all of their four funds in the first quarter of 2008. Sovereign Wealth Funds Recently the SWFs have played an integral role in the world’s financial system. Their Sources are fortified by petrodollars and trade surpluses largely beneficiaries of rising commodity prices. Their Uses have been instrumental in saving banks, hedge funds and private equity firms from insolvency. A back-of- an-envelop calculation stacks more than US$70 billion injected into these struggling financial institutions in the past year alone. SWFs are not immune to losses either. Blackstone’s shares were down about 46% since the IPO last year, leaving CIC with a paper loss of $1.37 Billion as the stock market’s close at the middle of March (11th March). SWFs' investments in banks such as Citigroup, UBS, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley amongst them have been critiqued that they might have been made on not-so-favorable terms to the SWFs. Because of their status of government ownership, SWFs have been accused of having political motives beyond their investment returns and thus closer scrutiny that resulted in many instances deal-breakers. Friends or Foes? If hedge funds were like brothers to private equity funds then SWFs have been the parents to both. Before they made investments directly, SWFs used to instead just invest through the PEs and HFs. Now all three compete directly in the marketplace. However, looking long-term, the SWFs could become a potential threat for Private Equity Funds and Hedge Funds. SWFs’ investments in financial-services Page 2 firms may be motivated not just by the investment returns, but in large by the desire to learn how those general partnerships are operated. If SWFs can fully build their own investment expertise, then there is no point for them to invest in Private Equity Funds and Hedge Funds. They can do deals by themselves and keep the annual and incentive fees. Better way to control the game? Private Equity and Hedge Funds are currently being regulated by the SEC of each domicile country. The problem is that many of these funds are incorporated offshore and the fund operations are therefore not subjected to the SEC scrutiny. Ideas have been kicked around to have supranational institutions such as the IMF and OECD regulate the SWFs. Though it is clear to all policy-makers that they should do something to control the investments made by these three giants, there is no clarity in the rules of engagement save for warm fuzzy words like "transparency" and "governance". Leverage perhaps is an obvious area that should be curbed. In many of these hedge fund muti-strategies, the idea is to "lock-in" small spreads and work with large trading capital. It is not uncommon that a billion dollar bet only produce two to three million dollars. So the trick is use leverage with the bet - may be 20, 50, or even 100 times the capital. If the bet, however, goes wrong, the result can be destabilizing to the global capital markets. Page 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Corporate Governance Lessons from the Financial Crisis
    ISSN 1995-2864 Financial Market Trends © OECD 2009 Pre-publication version for Vol. 2009/1 The Corporate Governance Lessons from the Financial Crisis Grant Kirkpatrick * This report analyses the impact of failures and weaknesses in corporate governance on the financial crisis, including risk management systems and executive salaries. It concludes that the financial crisis can be to an important extent attributed to failures and weaknesses in corporate governance arrangements which did not serve their purpose to safeguard against excessive risk taking in a number of financial services companies. Accounting standards and regulatory requirements have also proved insufficient in some areas. Last but not least, remuneration systems have in a number of cases not been closely related to the strategy and risk appetite of the company and its longer term interests. The article also suggests that the importance of qualified board oversight and robust risk management is not limited to financial institutions. The remuneration of boards and senior management also remains a highly controversial issue in many OECD countries. The current turmoil suggests a need for the OECD to re-examine the adequacy of its corporate governance principles in these key areas. * This report is published on the responsibility of the OECD Steering Group on Corporate Governance which agreed the report on 11 February 2009. The Secretariat’s draft report was prepared for the Steering Group by Grant Kirkpatrick under the supervision of Mats Isaksson. FINANCIAL MARKET TRENDS – ISSN 1995-2864 - © OECD 2008 1 THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE LESSONS FROM THE FINANCIAL CRISIS Main conclusions The financial crisis can This article concludes that the financial crisis can be to an be to an important important extent attributed to failures and weaknesses in corporate extent attributed to governance arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • Bear Stearns High Grade Structured Credit Strategies Fund
    Alter~(lv~ Inv<!'Stment M.I~i(,lIlenl AsSO<.iaUon AlMA'S ILLUSTRATIVE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR DUE DILIGENCE OF Bear Stearns High Grade Structured Credit Strategies Fund Published by The Alternative Investment Management Association Limited (AlMA) IMPORTANT NOTE All/any reference to AlMA should be removed from this document once any amendment is made of any question .or information added· including details of a company/fund. Only AlMA can distribute this questionnaire in its current form to its member companies and institutional investors on its confidential database. AlMA's Illustrative Questionnaire for Due Diligence Review of Hedge Fund Managers ~ The Alternative Investment Management Association Limited (AlMA), 2004 1 of 25 Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan BSAMFCIC 00000364 AlMA's Illustrative Questio~naire for Due Diligence Review of HEDGE FUND MANAGERS This due diligence questionnaire is a tool to assist investors when considering a hedge fund manager and a hedge fund. Most hedge fund strategies are more of an investment nature than a trading activity. Each strategy has its own peculiarities. The most important aspect is to understand clearly what you plan to invest in. You will also have to: • identify the markets covered, • understand what takes place in the portfolio, • understand the instruments used and how they are used, • understand how the strategy is operated, • identify the sources of return, • understand how ideas are generated, • check the risk control mechanism, • know the people you invest wIth professionally and, sometimes, personally. Not all of the following questions are applicable to aU managers but we recommend that you ask as many questions as possible before making a dedsion.
    [Show full text]
  • Hsi 12.31.20
    HSBC SECURITIES (USA) INC. Statement of Financial Condition December 31, 2020 2 HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION December 31, 2020 (in millions) Assets Cash................................................................................................................................................................... $ 285 Cash segregated under federal and other regulations ....................................................................................... 609 Financial instruments owned, at fair value (includes $9,072 pledged as collateral, which the counterparty has the right to sell or repledge)..................................................................................................................... 9,153 Securities purchased under agreements to resell (includes $4 at fair value)..................................................... 20,643 Receivable under securities borrowing arrangements....................................................................................... 11,758 Receivable from brokers, dealers, and clearing organizations.......................................................................... 4,154 Receivable from customers................................................................................................................................ 269 Other assets (include $13 at fair value)............................................................................................................. 295 Total assets.......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bear Stearns Asset Management Collateral Manager Presentation
    on ~ .. ' ~ &. e:.. >-3 (ti ig ~ ~ ~ 0.- ~ ~ ~ - IJ:j ~ n o o o o o 0\ -.l >-' on ~ ~ &. e:.. >-3 (ti ig ~ ~ ~ Introduction 0.- ~ • Bear Stearns Asset Management Inc. ("BSAM") is a corporation formed under the laws of the State of New York, and is focused on lugh value added investment solutions that span traditional and alternative assets for ~ iIlstitutional and high net worth investors. BSAM is committed to providing clients with world-class ~ investment management and thorough communication of both risKs and returns. • BSAM manages the Bear Stearns High Grade Structured Credit Strategies Fund ("BSHG"), a hedge fund incorporated on September 8, 2003, as a Cayman Islands exempted company. The Ftmd seeks to generate total annual returns through "cash and carry" transactions and capital markets arbitrage. The Furid generally invests in hi~h quality floating rate structured finance securities. lypically, 90% of the Fund's gross assets are invested in A.AA or AA structured finance assets. In order to mitiO"ate mark-to-market and credit risk, the Fund tactically buys credit insurance, generally through credit default swaps ("CDS"), on corporate indices and/or individual names. Interest rate auration is targeted to be zero, with net leverage of approximately lOx. • The Senior Portfolio Management Team has over 93 years of combined experience in international fixed income markets and structured finance. • The entire Collateral Surveillance and Portfolio Management Team consists of 33 members with an average of over 10 years of experience each. • BSHG cmrently manages over 30 billion in structured credit assets, across the following sectors: RMBS, Cf'vlBS, and Home Equity ABS COOs, CDO"2s, CLOs, and High Yield CBOs Investment Grade COOs and Synthetic COOs • As experienced participants in the structured finance market, the portfolio management team has the knowledge, experience and resources to identify attractive assets and monitor the credit risk inherent in these assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Proceeding: Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.; Citigroup Global
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Release No. 8684 / May 31, 2006 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 53888 / May 31, 2006 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-12310 ORDER INSTITUTING In the Matter of ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE-AND-DESIST BEAR, STEARNS & CO. INC.; CITIGROUP PROCEEDINGS, MAKING GLOBAL MARKETS, INC.; GOLDMAN, FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING SACHS & CO.; J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES, REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND INC.; LEHMAN BROTHERS INC.; A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A SMITH INCORPORATED; MORGAN OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED AND 1933 AND SECTION 15(b) OF MORGAN STANLEY DW INC.; RBC DAIN THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE RAUSCHER INC.; BANC OF AMERICA ACT OF 1934 SECURITIES LLC; A.G. EDWARDS & SONS, INC.; MORGAN KEEGAN & COMPANY, INC.; PIPER JAFFRAY & CO.; SUNTRUST CAPITAL MARKETS INC.; AND WACHOVIA CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, Respondents. I. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) against Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.; Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.; Goldman, Sachs & Co.; J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.; Lehman Brothers Inc.; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated; Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Morgan Stanley DW Inc.; RBC Dain Rauscher Inc.; Banc of America Securities LLC; A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.; Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.; Piper Jaffray & Co.; SunTrust Capital Markets Inc.; and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC (“Respondents”).
    [Show full text]
  • Bear Stearns - an Experienced Participant in the Structured Finance Market I!L BSAM Overview
    CI) ill 0) ........ill eu ........!..... (f) :t= "D ill !..... U "D ill L. :::J -+-' 0 :::J L. -+-' ( (f) ill "D cu L. C) ..cI 0) I CI) C L. eu ........ill (f) L. ro ill ill :-- - Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan BSAMFCIC 00000468 on ~ ~ &. e:.. >-3 (ti ig BEAR ~ STEARNS Asset Management ~ ~ ~ 0.- ~ Table of Contents ~ Section ~ .. Philosophy and Strategy. IIttR A Study of Historical Volatility of COO Asset C'lass IIIIIM Risk Factors Appendices a Terms and Conditions m Management Team Biographies .8 Bear Stearns - An Experienced Participant in the Structured Finance Market I!l BSAM Overview The above is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy private investment fund interests. Any investment in a private investment fund involves significant risks not associated with more conventional investment alternatives. These interests will be offered and sold only to "eligible investors," defined as institutional- investors, individuals and other entities that satisfy certain minimum income, net-worth andlor other requirements. Risk factors, fees and expense informatio"n are set forth in the Confidential Private Placement Memorandum. The Fund: (i) engages in leveraging and other speculative investment practices that may increase the risk of investment loss; (ii) issues interests that are subject to redemption and transfer restrictions; (iii) is not required to provide periodic pricing or valuation information to investors; (iv) may experience delays in distributing important tax information; (v) is not subject to the same regulatory requirements or oversight as mutual funds and (vi) charges investment management and performance fees that will offset the Fund's trading profits and (vii) is managed entirely by a small team of managers applying a generally similar trading program, which could create lack of-diversification, and consequently higher risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Jpmorgan Chase to Acquire Bear Stearns
    JPMorgan Chase To Acquire Bear Stearns New York, March 16, 2008 -- JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) announced it is acquiring The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. (NYSE: BSC). The Boards of Directors of both companies have unanimously approved the transaction. The transaction will be a stock-for-stock exchange. JPMorgan Chase will exchange 0.05473 shares of JPMorgan Chase common stock per one share of Bear Stearns stock. Based on the closing price of March 15, 2008, the transaction would have a value of approximately $2 per share. Effective immediately, JPMorgan Chase is guaranteeing the trading obligations of Bear Stearns and its subsidiaries and is providing management oversight for its operations. Other than shareholder approval, the closing is not subject to any material conditions. The transaction is expected to have an expedited close by the end of the calendar second quarter 2008. The Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and other federal agencies have given all necessary approvals. In addition to the financing the Federal Reserve ordinarily provides through its Discount Window, the Fed will provide special financing in connection with this transaction. The Fed has agreed to fund up to $30 billion of Bear Stearns' less liquid assets. "JPMorgan Chase stands behind Bear Stearns," said Jamie Dimon, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of JPMorgan Chase. "Bear Stearns' clients and counterparties should feel secure that JPMorgan is guaranteeing Bear Stearns' counterparty risk. We welcome their clients, counterparties and employees to our firm, and we are glad to be their partner." Dimon added, "This transaction will provide good long-term value for JPMorgan Chase shareholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from the Sub-Prime Crisis Viral V
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES PRECAUTIONARY HOARDING OF LIQUIDITY AND INTER-BANK MARKETS: EVIDENCE FROM THE SUB-PRIME CRISIS Viral V. Acharya Ouarda Merrouche Working Paper 16395 http://www.nber.org/papers/w16395 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 September 2010 A part of this paper was completed while Acharya was a Senior Houblon-Norman Fellow at the Bank of England (BoE) and a Professor of Finance at London Business School, and Ouarda Merrouche was an Economist at the BoE's Financial Stability Directorate. This paper reflects the authors' own opinion and not necessarily those of the BoE. Acharya is grateful for the support of BSI Gamma Foundation and Europlace de Finance. Authors are grateful to seminar participants at the Bangor Business School, Bank of England, BSI Gamma Foundation's September 2008 Conference in Zurich, the CREDIT Conference 2008 in Venice, De Paul University, the Euronext conference in Amsterdam 2009, the European Central Bank, Europlace de Finance conference 2009, FIRS Conference 2010, Goethe University, the Kansas Fed, the NBER Summer Institute 2009, University of Waterloo, Unicredit Conference 2009, the World Bank, the paper's discussants (Morten Bech, Catharine Casamatta, Hans Degryse, Arvind Krishnamurthy, David Lando, Loriana Pelizzon and Enrichetta Ravina), Jose Liberti, Kjell Nyborg, Raghuram Rajan, Amit Seru, Vikrant Vig, and especially Roger Clews and Simon Wells (for helpful discussions and insights concerning BoE's monetary policy framework and Sterling money markets). We thank Rachel Bracken and Liz Tregear for help with collecting the data and Rustom Irani for research assistance. All errors remain our own.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study on BEAR STEARNS
    BEAR STEARNS William Ryback Case Study on BEAR STEARNS Copyright by the Toronto Leadership Centre. This case was prepared exclusively for a class discussion at a Banking, Insurance or Securities session offered by the Toronto Centre. Information has been summarized and should not be regarded as complete or accurate in every detail. The text should be considered as class exercise material and in no way be used to reach conclusions about the nature or behaviour of any of the persons or institutions mentioned.. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form without the permission of the Toronto Leadership Centre for Financial Sector Supervision. Sources: This document is based on information that was in the public domain at the times mentioned or which became public after the resolution of the issues. It does not include information confidential to the financial institution involved. 1 BEAR STEARNS William Ryback TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION a. Overview 3 b Key Issues 4 c Learning Objectives 4 d Core Principles 4 2. CASE NARRATIVE a The Company 5 b The culture 5 c The Problem 7 d The Regulators 8 e The Last Week 9 2 BEAR STEARNS William Ryback INTRODUCTION Overview Bear Stearns was a large investment bank, securities trader, and brokerage firm operating globally with headquarters in New York. The firm had been in operation for 85 years when its outsized position in subprime mortgages raised questions from investors, clients, and counterparties about the bank’s balance sheet and the quality of its assets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Overstated Promise of Corporate Governance
    University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 2010 The Overstated Promise of Corporate Governance Jill E. Fisch University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Banking and Finance Law Commons, Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Corporate Finance Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Economics Commons, Law and Economics Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons Repository Citation Fisch, Jill E., "The Overstated Promise of Corporate Governance" (2010). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 1045. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1045 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Overstated Promise of Corporate Governance Jill E. Fisch† Corporate Governance: Promises Kept, Promises Broken Jonathan Macey. Princeton, 2008. Pp vii, 334. Corporate governance is in trouble. The implosion of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, the near collapse of Citigroup and other large commercial banks, the bankruptcy of the US auto industry, and the massive overexposure of AIG to subprime risk have wreaked unprece- dented turmoil in the capital markets
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Governance Group
    December 29, 2008 Corporate Governance Group Client Alert BEIJING FRANK F URT HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGE L ES MUNIC H NEW YORK SINGAPORE TOK Y O WAS H INGTON , DC Please feel free to discuss any aspect of this Client NY STATE COURT DECISION Alert with your regular Milbank contacts or with RELATING TO BEAR STEARNS any of the members of our Corporate Governance TAKEOVER SHOULD PROVIDE Group, whose names and contact information are COMFORT TO CORPORATE provided herein. DIRECTORS FORCED TO TAKE In addition, if you would like copies of our other ACTION IN UNSTABLE MARKETS Client Alerts, please contact any of the attorneys listed. You can also obtain this Court Defers to Business Judgment of Bear Stearns Directors and our other Client Alerts by visiting our website at in Connection with JP Morgan Merger http://www.milbank.com and choosing the “Client On December 4, 2008, in In re Bear Stearns Litigation,1 the New York Supreme Alerts & Newsletters” link under “Newsroom/ Court dismissed investor challenges to the federally-assisted acquisition of Bear Events”. Stearns by JPMorgan Chase. To our knowledge, this is the first judicial decision in the spate of shareholder class action lawsuits brought in the wake of the unprecedented meltdown of many of our leading financial institutions during 2008. The plaintiffs This Client Alert is in this class action, former Bear Stearns shareholders, sought (among other relief) a source of general damages from Bear Stearns’ directors for alleged violation of their fiduciary duties information for clients and in negotiating and approving the merger with JP Morgan.
    [Show full text]
  • Reputation, Bailouts, and Interest Rate Spread Dynamics
    Reputation, Bailouts, and Interest Rate Spread Dynamics Alessandro Dovis Rishabh Kirpalani University of Pennsylvania University of Wisconsin-Madison and NBER [email protected] [email protected] December 2020 Abstract We propose a joint theory for interest rate dynamics and bailout decisions. In- terest rate spreads are driven by time-varying fundamentals and expectations of fu- ture bailouts from a common government. Private agents have beliefs about whether the government is a commitment type, which never bails out, or an optimizing type, which sequentially decides whether to bail out or not, and learn by observing its ac- tions. The model provides an explanation for why we often observe governments initially refusing to bail out borrowers at the beginning of a crisis even if they eventu- ally end up providing a bailout after the crisis aggravates. In the typical equilibrium outcome, spreads are non-monotonic in fundamentals, and decisions on whether to bail out individual borrowers affect the spreads of other borrowers. These dynamics are consistent with the behavior of bailouts and spreads during the recent US financial crisis and European debt crisis. Expectations about the generosity of bailouts are an important driver for interest rates on defaultable debt. For example, in the recent US financial crisis, CDS spreads of large fi- nancial institutions rose sharply after regulators let Lehman Brothers fail, a negative news event about the willingness of the government to bail out financial firms, but reversed course after the announcement of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), a positive news event, even though fundamentals arguably worsened. Similarly, EU sovereign debt spreads declined significantly after the announcement of the unlimited bond buying pro- gram (OMT) by the ECB, which was a positive news event about the willingness to pro- vide government support in the future.
    [Show full text]