Rubber Vine Cryptostegia Grandifloraand Cryptostegia Madagascariensis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rubber Vine Cryptostegia Grandifloraand Cryptostegia Madagascariensis Restricted invasive plant Rubber vine Cryptostegia grandiflora and Cryptostegia madagascariensis Rubber vine’s ability to quickly spread and colonise This decreases biodiversity and prevents access to both areas makes it a threat to many areas of northern stock and native animals. It also creates habitat for feral Australia. Due to this ability, rubber vine is listed as a animals. Infestations expand outward from waterways, Weed of National Significance. hillsides and pastures, resulting in loss of grazing land and increased difficulty in mustering stock. Rubber vine generally invades waterways first, where the seeds germinate in moist silt layers after rain. The plant Rubber vine is poisonous to stock, though seldom eaten. smothers riparian vegetation and forms dense, sometimes Most deaths due to rubber vine occur after stock have impenetrable, thickets. been stressed, or when other feed is scarce. Legal requirements Methods of spread Rubber vine (Cryptostegia grandiflora) and ornamental Rubber vine seeds spread by wind and water. rubber vine (Cryptostegia madagascariensis) are category 3 restricted invasive plants under the Biosecurity Act Habitat and distribution 2014. They must not be given away, sold, or released into the environment. The Act requires everyone to take Rubber vine is native to Madagascar, but is now widely all reasonable and practical measures to minimise the distributed throughout tropical and subtropical regions of biosecurity risks associated with invasive plants under the world. their control. This is called a general biosecurity obligation (GBO). This fact sheet gives examples of how you can meet The plant was introduced to Australia as an ornamental your GBO. shrub in 1875 or earlier, and was popular in north Queensland mining settlements due to its luxuriant growth At a local level, each local government must have a even under harsh conditions. Weedy infestations were biosecurity plan that covers invasive plants in its area. recorded around Charters Towers early this century. This plan may include actions to be taken on certain species. Some of these actions may be required under Rubber vine prefers areas where annual rainfall local laws. Contact your local government for more is 400–1400 mm, and is well adapted to a monsoonal information. climate. Infestations of rubber vine are now found throughout Description river systems of southern Cape York and the Gulf of Carpentaria, south along the coast to the Burnett River, Rubber vine is a vigorous climber with twining, whip-like and isolated infestations occur as far south as Gatton and shoots that can grow unsupported as an untidy, multi- as far west as the Northern Territory border. stemmed shrub 1–2 m high, or it can scramble up to 30 m high in trees. The stems, leaves and unripe pods exude a Infestations are common throughout central Queensland, white, milky sap when broken or cut. while in western Queensland there are infestations in the Mount Isa, Longreach and Aramac areas. Isolated Leaves are dark green and somewhat glossy, 6−10 cm infestations have been reported in Western Australia. long, 3−5 cm wide, and in opposite pairs. Flowers are large and showy, with five white to light purple petals arranged in a funnel shape. Control The seed pods are rigid and grow in pairs at the end of a Managing rubber vine short stalk. The pods are 10–12 cm long, 3–4 cm wide and The GBO requires a person to take reasonable and each can contain up to 450 brown seeds. Each seed has a practical measures to minimise the biosecurity risks tuft of long, white, silky hairs, which enable easy dispersal posed by rubber vine. This fact sheet provides information by wind and water. and some options for controlling rubber vine. Ornamental rubber vine (Cryptostegia madagascariensis) Effective control of rubber vine can be achieved by a is a shrub up to 3 m tall, if unsupported and stems can number of methods, alone or in combination depending climb to 10 m if supported. Bark is sparsely dotted with on the situation and the severity of infestation. All areas corky patches. Leaves are dark green, glossy, with pale treated must be periodically checked and any regrowth underside, 2–11 cm long, 1.5–5.5 cm wide, arranged treated or the initial treatment efforts will be wasted. in opposite pairs. Plant produces milky latex sap when leaves, fruit or branches are cut. Rubber vine seed is most commonly spread by wind and running water. Flowers are pink-purple, 4–6 cm long, found near branchlet ends. Pods are 7–9 cm long, contain seeds It is thus difficult to prevent seed coming onto uninfested 5–5.9 mm long, 1.8–3.5 mm wide, topped with silky tuft land if there is rubber vine anywhere in the area. Your of white hairs. goal should be to prevent rubber vine from establishing and forming dense infestations. It is essential to regularly Life cycle inspect all areas of your property, paying particular attention to creeks and gullies. Rubber vine flowers at any time of year if sufficient moisture is available. Usually, June and July are the only This is most important where prevailing winds are known non-flowering months. Plant stem diameter must be to blow from infested areas, or where infestations approximately 20 mm before flowering can occur. occur upstream. Seed pod formation occurs from spring to late autumn, with Any isolated plants located should be treated promptly. peak seed production corresponding to maximum flowering. All control of rubber vine will require follow-up treatments Eventually, pods dry out and split open, with pod-splitting to keep your property clean. As rubber vine spreads occurring approximately 200 days after formation. quickly, small infestations should be controlled first to Seeds are scattered by wind, but also carried downstream prevent them from becoming major problem areas. Dense by water. Approximately 95% of seed is viable, although infestations are difficult and costly to treat. germination requires favourable temperature and soil moisture conditions. 2 Rubber vine Cryptostegia grandiflora and Cryptostegia madagascariensis Follow-up treatment must be budgeted for within Insects the overall control program. Techniques need to be Also established is the moth Euclasta whalleyi, whose integrated for successful rubber vine management. larvae are leaf feeders. Observation indicates the moth Consideration should be given to coordinating control over prefers stressed plants, either from limited soil moisture a catchment area. or high levels of rust infection. Five suggested strategies for controlling rubber vine in The moth’s period of activity is the dry season. A native scattered, medium, and dense infestations are outlined fly parasite and a disease can reduce the localised in Table 2. abundance of the Euclasta larvae. Fire The larvae are tapered at both ends, grow up to 30 mm Rubber vine infestations can be very effectively controlled long, and are grey-brown with orange dots along their by burning. Preparing and managing fuel load prior to sides. Fine silken threads and black, bead-like droppings burning, and following up in a timely manner after the are often found near the larval feeding damage. fires, are critical to the overall success of the program. The creamy-brown moths are active at night and rest at a 0 It is recommended that you perform two successive annual 45 angle from a surface, with their wings folded. The life burns. The first fire will open up the infestation to increase cycle from egg to adult takes 21–28 days. grass growth (fuel load) while killing rubber vine plants. Defoliation reduces the smothering effect on other The second fire will clean up the regrowth that occurs after vegetation and causes an increase in leaf litter and the first fire. promotes increased grass growth amongst rubber vine, An appropriate fire regime is an effective tool for managing increasing fuel loads required for fire management. rubber vine over the long term, as well as being an Decreased flower and pod production should reduce the effective follow-up to other control methods. ability of rubber vine to spread. Mechanical control Biological control is also important because it impacts on other control methods. Several mechanical techniques are effective in controlling rubber vine. The type of infestation will determine the Herbicide control technique required. Herbicides recommended for use on rubber vine are listed • Scattered or medium-density infestations: Where in Table 1 (overleaf). Preference ratings (taking account of possible, repeated slashing close to ground level effectiveness and cost) are shown. is recommended. Aerial application • Dense infestations: During winter, stick-raking or blade-ploughing reduces the bulk of the infestation. Three herbicides are currently registered for aerial Pasture should be sown and windrows burned to kill application (refer to Table 1. Two of these are foliar residual seed. Follow-up treatment is essential. It is herbicides and the other is a soil-applied herbicide. As important to comply with the relevant state and/or a result, the necessary conditions that apply to foliar local government native vegetation legislation, and it and soil applications is also applicable to the respective should be noted that causing even accidental death of chemical when aerially applied. vegetation can be a breach of this legislation. People considering aerial application are advised to contact 13 25 23 for current advice on use of this technique. Biological control Two biological control agents are successfully established, Foliar spray and their impact depends on abundance. Both agents The following points should be followed carefully: cause abnormal defoliation, creating an ‘energy sink’, which appears to reduce seed production. These agents • There must be little to no rust present as it affects the usually do not kill established rubber vine plants. health of the plant and its ability to take chemical up through its leaves.
Recommended publications
  • Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 - 2021
    Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 - 2021 Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 – 2021 Page 1 Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 - 2021 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document was developed and produced by Cape York Natural Resource Management Ltd (Cape York NRM). Cape York NRM would like to acknowledge the following organisations and their officers for their contribution and support in developing the Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan: Cook Shire Council Northern Peninsula Area Regional Council Aurukun, Hopevale, Kowanyama Lockhart, Mapoon, Napranum, Pormpuraaw and Wujal Wujal Aboriginal Shire Councils Weipa Town Authority Rio Tinto (Alcan) Biosecurity Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage Protection Department of Natural resources and Mines Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Far North Queensland Regional Organisation of Councils Individual Cape York Peninsula Registered Native Title Body Corporates and Land Trusts Cape York Weeds and Feral Animals Incorporated Copyright 2016 Published by Cape York Natural Resource Management (Cape York NRM) Ltd. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study research, news reporting, criticism or review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgment of the source is included. Major extracts of the entire document may not be reproduced by any process without the written permission of the Chief Executive Officer, Cape York Natural Resource Management (Cape York NRM) Ltd. Please reference as: Cape York Natural Resource Management 2016, Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 -2021, Report prepared by the Cape York Natural Resource Management (Cape York NRM) Disclaimer: This Plan has been compiled in good faith as a basis for community and stakeholder consultation and is in draft form.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Additional Herbicide Control Options for Rubber Vine (Cryptostegia Grandiflora R.Br.)
    Twentieth Australasian Weeds Conference Developing additional herbicide control options for rubber vine (Cryptostegia grandiflora R.Br.) Shane D. Campbell and Dannielle A. Brazier Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Tropical Weeds Research Centre, PO Box 187, Charters Towers, Queensland 4820, Australia ([email protected]) Summary Herbicide control of rubber vine (Cryp- along with its classification as a Weed of National tostegia grandiflora R.Br.), a Weed of National Sig- Significance (Doak and Deveze 2004). A large body of nificance in Australia, can be effectively achieved in research has been undertaken into the impacts, ecology most situations using a range of chemicals and various and control of this weed over the last 30 years (Tom- techniques, including basal bark, cut stump, foliar and ley 1995, Grice 1996, Palmer and Vogler 2012). This aerial applications. Nevertheless control in areas with has resulted in the identification of effective control poor access and with native vegetation still poses dif- options for different densities and situations, includ- ficulties for some land managers, particularly doing ing the individual and integrated use of biocontrol, so in a cost effective manner. chemical, and mechanical techniques and the use of The successful incorporation of low-volume fire (Doak and Deveze 2004, Palmer and Vogler 2012). high-concentration herbicide applications into control In recent years low-volume high-concentration programs for several woody weeds in recent years herbicide applications (e.g. splatter guns) have become prompted further testing of this technique for control increasingly used in Queensland as an effective option of rubber vine. The efficacy of single rates of four for controlling some other woody weeds in difficult herbicides plus a combination of two herbicides was to access areas, such as lantana (Lantana camara L.), compared against an untreated control.
    [Show full text]
  • Restricted Invasive Plants of Queensland
    Restricted invasive plants Restricted invasive plants of Queensland Restricted invasive plants of Queensland Hudson pear (Cylindropuntia rosea syn. Cylindropuntia pallida) Fireweed (Senecio madagascariensis) Mother-of-millions (Kalanchoe delagoense) Bunny ears (Opuntia microdasys) The new Biosecurity Act The Biosecurity Act 2014 protects Queensland’s economy, Species not listed as restricted may be listed as prohibited biodiversity and people’s lifestyles from the threats posed under the Act or may be listed by a local government level by invasive pests and diseases under local laws. Under the Act, certain species of invasive plants are listed Australian Government legislation administered by the as ‘restricted’ biosecurity matter. Australian Department of Agriculture also applies to the import of all plants into Australia. What is restricted matter? • Mexican bean tree (Cecropia pachystachya, C. palmata and C. peltata) Restricted matter is listed in the Act and includes a range • Mexican feather grass (Nassella tenuissima) of invasive plants that are present in Queensland. These invasive plants are having significant adverse impacts • miconia (M. calvescens, M. cionotricha, M. nervosa in Queensland and it is desirable to manage them and and M. racemosa) prevent their spread, thereby protecting un-infested • mikania vine (Mikania micrantha) parts of the State. • mimosa pigra (Mimosa pigra) The Act requires everyone to take all reasonable and practical measures to minimise the biosecurity risks • bunny ears (Opuntia microdasys) associated with invasive plants and animals under • riverina prickly pear (Opunita elata) their control. This is called a general biosecurity obligation (GBO). • water mimosa (Neptunia oleracea and N. plena). The specific restriction requirements also apply to a Restricted invasive plants that are person when dealing with restricted invasive matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptostegia Spp. Rubber Vine Asclepiadaceae
    Cryptostegia spp. Rubber vine Asclepiadaceae Forest Starr, Kim Starr, and Lloyd Loope United States Geological Survey--Biological Resources Division Haleakala Field Station, Maui, Hawai'i January, 2003 OVERVIEW Cryptostegia species, C. grandiflora and C. madagascariensis, are widely cultivated and have become pests in places where they are introduced, including Australia, where C. grandiflora has been called one of their worst weeds, and in Florida, where C. madagascariensis is considered a category II weed by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. On Maui, the distribution of Cryptostegia spp. is still small and the species are only sparingly naturalized in two locations. Cryptostegia is also sparingly naturalized in Kawaihae, Hawai'i, and likely cultivated at least on O'ahu and possibly other Hawaiian Islands. Because of its weedy history and limited distribution on Maui, Cryptostegia spp. has been targeted by the Maui Invasive Species Committee (MISC) for eradication. Hopefully, this invader will be stopped before it is rampant and widespread. Controlling this aggressive vine now could potentially save large amounts of resources, time, and money in the future. TAXONOMY Family: Asclepiadaceae (milkweed family) (Neal 1965). Latin name: Cryptostegia grandiflora R. Br. and Cryptostegia madagascariensis Bojer. (Bailey and Bailey 1976). Synonyms: Nerium grandiflorum Roxb. ex R. Br. (PLANTS 2001). Common names: Rubber vine, India rubber vine, Palay rubber vine (Neal 1965, Bailey and Bailey 1976, PLANTS 2001). Taxonomic notes: Cyrptostegia is within the milkweed family, Asclepiadaceae, which includes about 220 gernera and 2,000 species of perennial herbs, shrubs, and vines, with milky juice (Neal 1965). The genus, Cyrptostegia, is made up of probably three species of woody lianas with milky sap, native to tropical Africa and Madagascar (Bailey and Bailey 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • MNES Threatened Species Dossier, Part 1
    EPBC Referral – Threatened Species Dossier ABP Project ARROW BOWEN PIPELINE EPBC MNES Threatened Species Dossiers EPBC Referral – Threatened Species Dossier ABP Project Table of Contents 1 Flora ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Dichanthium queenslandicum (King Blue-grass) ................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Conservation status ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Description ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.3 Distribution ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.4 Habitat ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.5 Ecology ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1.6 Survey effort and methods undertaken for ABP ................................................................................ 3 1.1.7 Threats .............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1.8
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptostegia Grandiflora Global Invasive Species Database (GISD)
    FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Cryptostegia grandiflora Cryptostegia grandiflora System: Terrestrial Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Plantae Magnoliophyta Magnoliopsida Gentianales Asclepiadaceae Common name India rubber vine (English), caucho de la India (Spanish, Galapagos), rubber vine (English), palay rubber vine (English), purple allamanda (English), liane de gatope (French, New Caledonia) Synonym Nerium grandiflorum , Roxb. ex R. Br. Similar species Summary Cryptostegia grandiflora is a self supporting, many-stemmed vine that is capable of growing over trees up to 15m high, smothering and pulling them down. It occurs in dry and moist forests in disturbed situations where there is temporary or permanent water, such as in rainforest openings and along roadsides. C. grandiflora is poisonous to stock when consumed and it forms impenetrable thickets that may restrict stock access to water. It decreases water catchments due to increased transpiration resulting in a loss of trees and native vines, which in turn leads to a loss of biodiversity and habitat. view this species on IUCN Red List Species Description Cryptostegia grandiflora, is a self supporting, scrambling, many-stemmed vine that grows to 2 metres tall with long trailing whips. A milky sap oozes from stems, leaves and seedpods when cut or broken. Leaves are dark green and glossy, 6-10cm long, 3-5cm wide and in opposite pairs. Roots have been found at a depth of 13 metres in mine shafts. Roots of seedlings are twice as long as shoots. The growth form of the vine differs depending on the surrounding conditions. They can form dense canopies of overpapping plants with long whips, form towers upto 30mts high the height of native trees and grow as freestanding shrubs in the absence of other vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Ecosystem Technical Descriptions for Einasleigh Uplands
    Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts Regional Ecosystem Technical Descriptions Technical descriptions provide a detailed description of the full range in structure and floristic composition of regional ecosystems (e.g. 9.10.3) and their component vegetation communities (e.g. 9.10.3a, 9.10.3b). The descriptions are compiled using site survey data from the Queensland Herbarium’s CORVEG database. Distribution maps, representative images (if available) and the pre-clearing and remnant area (hectares) of each vegetation community derived from the regional ecosystem mapping (spatial) data are included. The technical descriptions should be used in conjunction with the fields from the regional ecosystem description database (REDD) for a full description of the regional ecosystem. Quantitative site data from relatively undisturbed sites are extracted from CORVEG and summarized to provide information specific to each vegetation community. Technical descriptions include the attributes: tree canopy height and cover and native plant species composition of the predominant layer, which are used to assess the remnant status of vegetation under the Vegetation Management Act 1999. However, as technical descriptions reflect the full range in structure and floristic composition across the climatic, natural disturbance and geographic range of the regional ecosystem, local reference sites should be used where possible (Neldner et al. 2012 section 3.3.1). The technical descriptions are subject to review and are updated as additional
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptostegia Grandiflora Click on Images to Enlarge
    Species information Abo ut Reso urces Hom e A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Cryptostegia grandiflora Click on images to enlarge Family Apocynaceae Scientific Name Cryptostegia grandiflora R.Br. Brown, R. (1820) Edwards's Botanical Register 5 : t. 43. Type: Bot. Reg. 5: t. 435 (1820). Lecto. fide J. Marohasy & P. I. Forster, Austral. Sys. Bot. 4: 574 (1991). Leaves and flowers, habit. Copyright CSIRO Common name Rubber Vine; Palay Rubber-vine; Indian Rubber-vine; Vine, Rubber; Rubber-plant Weed * Stem Usually grows as a vine but can flower and fruit as a shrub. Vine stem diameters to 4 cm recorded. Stem vessels tend to be arranged in annular rings. Milky exudate from the pith as well as the bark. Leaves and fruit. Copyright Australian Plant Image Index Leaves (APII). Twigs and stems marked by prominent pale-coloured lenticels. Petioles and twigs produce a milky exudate. Leaf blades of moderate size, about 5-7 x 2.5-3 cm. Lateral veins curved throughout their length but not forming distinct loops. Reticulate veins quite distinct, forming a definite net. A number of peg-like glands visible in the leaf axils. Flowers Flowers about 50 mm diam. Calyx producing a milky exudate. Each calyx lobe with two or three small triangular glands on the inner (adaxial) surface. Corolla glabrous, +/- white on the inside but mainly mauve or purple outside. Pollen pale brown, granular, +/- aggregated in pollinia. Carpels +/- free at the apex but joined towards the base.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptostegia Grandiflora Roxb. Ex R. Br
    www.gob.mx/conafor www.conabio.gob.mx www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/invasoras “Elaborado en el marco del proyecto GEF Especies Invasoras” Cryptostegia grandiflora Roxb. Ex R. Br. 1. Descripción taxonómica cie exótica pone en riesgo a la flora y los vertebrados e invertebrados ya que puede Reino: Plantae convertirse en una especie dominante. Phylum: Spermatophyta Clase: Dicotyledonae En México se le ha reportado en Chiapas, Orden: Gentianales Tabasco, Yucatán y Baja California Sur Familia: Apocynaceae (CABI, 2013). Género: Cryptostegia Especie: Cryptostegia grandiflora 6. Hábitat 2. Nombre común En Madagascar se distribuye como un tre- pador en el piso superior de los bosques de Chicote, clavel alemán, manto de cristo, galería y en forma de arbusto en zonas ri- canario morado, caucho de la india, bejuco, Foto: Jayesh Patil. bereñas, a lo largo de barrancos, arroyos y rubber vine, purple allamanda. cunetas donde se acumula el agua de esco- Fuente: http://www.naturalista.mx/pho- rrentía (CABI, 2013). Puede invadir ambien- 3. Sinonimias tos/46014 tes semiáridos, tropicales y subtropicales, específicamente se dispersa sobre las zonas Nerium grandiflorum Roxb (CABI, 2013; ribereñas, ya que prefieren sitios con abun- Tropicos, 2017). 5. Estatus en México dante humedad y arbustos o árboles bajos para apoyar sus tallos trepadores. 4. Origen y distribución Desde 1935 se le documento su presencia en un oasis, pero no se le había dado impor- Experiencias que comparten Rodríguez-Es- Es nativa de Madagascar, se le ha repor- tancia, fue hasta el 2006 que el equipo de trella y colaboradores (2010) confirman tado como especie invasora en Estados trabajo de Rodríguez-Estrella et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mimicker of Yellow Oleander Poisoning
    linical f C To o x l ic a o n r l o u g o y J ISSN: 2161-0495 Journal of Clinical Toxicology Case Report A Mimicker of Yellow Oleander Poisoning Balamurugan Nathan* Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India ABSTRACT Cardiac glycosides are found in various plant products. Here we report a case of poisoning due to Cryptostegia grandiflora which was prescribed for a particular skin disease by a herbal medicine practitioner. This patient presented with nausea and was found to have second degree AV block. It was initially suspected to be a case of yellow oleander poisoning which is common in the southern part of our country, but was later found to be poisoning due to Cryptostegia grandiflora which also contains cardiac glycosides. A field visit and examination of the plant by a botanist confirmed the same. The patient required temporary pacing for the arrhythmia and was discharged after a week. Keywords: Cryptostegia grandiflora; AV block; Arrhythmia; Hyperkalemia; Thrombocytopenia. INTRODUCTION In the emergency department, the combination of gastrointestinal symptoms with heart block should make one suspect poisoning due to cardiac glycosides. Here we report a case of poisoning due to Cryptostegia grandiflora which also contains cardiac glycosides. Toxicity of Cryptostegia grandiflora is known among animals. However, very few case reports are available on the human toxicity of Cryptostegia grandiflora worldwide. CASE DESCRIPTION A 45-year-old male presented to the emergency department with recurrent episodes of vomiting of one day duration. He had ingested a paste made up of leaves of a plant, which was given to Figure 1: Plant leaves which were consumed by the patient.
    [Show full text]
  • African Ornamentals for Miami Dade
    A Guide to Planting an African-Am erican/African Focused Yard in Miam i-Dade County: A Selection of Ornam ental African Plants Suitable for the Miam i-Dade Landscape John McLaughlin Miami-Dade Extension Office 18710 SW 288 Street Homestead, FL 33030 The sub-tropical climate of Miami-Dade permits the use of many outstanding landscape plants native to Africa. W hilst many of the w orld’s most esteemed ornamental plants are from east and especially Southern Africa, an attempt has been made to include plants indigenous to other parts of sub-Saharan Africa, especially W . Africa. The plants discussed are arranged in alphabetical order according to the currently accepted scientific name for each plant1. Some of the plants described below are adapted to far more arid conditions than prevail in south Florida. W hilst this is advantageous in terms of landscape w ater needs, care should be taken w hen choosing a site for installing such plants. They w ill all require excellent drainage, good air circulation and full sun, though a few can w ithstand slight shade. Part of the yard could be developed as a dry rock garden to feature these plants. This entails choosing an open site in full sun, and constructing raised beds using rubble and larger rocks and filling in w ith coarse sand and gravel2. Some organic material, such as garden compost, coir or sphagnum peat plus grit can be incorporated w ith the sand w here plants are to be installed. Plants that are especially tender may be damaged during the cooler months of the year, and this is indicated in the descriptions below .
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Impact Study
    South Walker Creek Mulgrave Resource Access: Stage 2C (MRA2C) EPBC 2017-7957 Appendix E: Ecological Impact Study Mulgrave Stage 2C Ecological Impact Study Assessment of Matters of National Environmental Significance Prepared for BHP 19 July 2018 Mulgrave Stage 2C Impact Assessment DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name Mulgrave Stage 2C Ecological Impact Study / MRA2C Preliminary Documentation Project Number 2251 / 8852 Liz Fisher Project Manager (07) 3503 7194 471 Adelaide St, Brisbane QLD 4000 Prepared by Loren Appleby, Renee Whitchurch, Jessie McCudden & Liz Fisher Reviewed by Ailsa Kerswell & Tom Kaveney Approved by Ailsa Kerswell Status FINAL Last saved on 19 July 2018 Cover photo Carborough Creek, ELA 2016 This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2018. Mulgrave Stage 2C Ecological Impact Study. Prepared for BHP.’ Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and BHP. The scope of services was defined in consultation with BHP, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter.
    [Show full text]