Undesirable Plants and Animals
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 - 2021
Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 - 2021 Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 – 2021 Page 1 Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 - 2021 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document was developed and produced by Cape York Natural Resource Management Ltd (Cape York NRM). Cape York NRM would like to acknowledge the following organisations and their officers for their contribution and support in developing the Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan: Cook Shire Council Northern Peninsula Area Regional Council Aurukun, Hopevale, Kowanyama Lockhart, Mapoon, Napranum, Pormpuraaw and Wujal Wujal Aboriginal Shire Councils Weipa Town Authority Rio Tinto (Alcan) Biosecurity Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage Protection Department of Natural resources and Mines Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Far North Queensland Regional Organisation of Councils Individual Cape York Peninsula Registered Native Title Body Corporates and Land Trusts Cape York Weeds and Feral Animals Incorporated Copyright 2016 Published by Cape York Natural Resource Management (Cape York NRM) Ltd. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study research, news reporting, criticism or review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgment of the source is included. Major extracts of the entire document may not be reproduced by any process without the written permission of the Chief Executive Officer, Cape York Natural Resource Management (Cape York NRM) Ltd. Please reference as: Cape York Natural Resource Management 2016, Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 -2021, Report prepared by the Cape York Natural Resource Management (Cape York NRM) Disclaimer: This Plan has been compiled in good faith as a basis for community and stakeholder consultation and is in draft form. -
Developing Additional Herbicide Control Options for Rubber Vine (Cryptostegia Grandiflora R.Br.)
Twentieth Australasian Weeds Conference Developing additional herbicide control options for rubber vine (Cryptostegia grandiflora R.Br.) Shane D. Campbell and Dannielle A. Brazier Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Tropical Weeds Research Centre, PO Box 187, Charters Towers, Queensland 4820, Australia ([email protected]) Summary Herbicide control of rubber vine (Cryp- along with its classification as a Weed of National tostegia grandiflora R.Br.), a Weed of National Sig- Significance (Doak and Deveze 2004). A large body of nificance in Australia, can be effectively achieved in research has been undertaken into the impacts, ecology most situations using a range of chemicals and various and control of this weed over the last 30 years (Tom- techniques, including basal bark, cut stump, foliar and ley 1995, Grice 1996, Palmer and Vogler 2012). This aerial applications. Nevertheless control in areas with has resulted in the identification of effective control poor access and with native vegetation still poses dif- options for different densities and situations, includ- ficulties for some land managers, particularly doing ing the individual and integrated use of biocontrol, so in a cost effective manner. chemical, and mechanical techniques and the use of The successful incorporation of low-volume fire (Doak and Deveze 2004, Palmer and Vogler 2012). high-concentration herbicide applications into control In recent years low-volume high-concentration programs for several woody weeds in recent years herbicide applications (e.g. splatter guns) have become prompted further testing of this technique for control increasingly used in Queensland as an effective option of rubber vine. The efficacy of single rates of four for controlling some other woody weeds in difficult herbicides plus a combination of two herbicides was to access areas, such as lantana (Lantana camara L.), compared against an untreated control. -
Survey of Roadside Alien Plants in Hawai`I Volcanoes National Park and Adjacent Residential Areas 2001–2005
Technical Report HCSU-032 SURVEY OF ROADSIDE ALIEN PLANts IN HAWAI`I VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK AND ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS 2001–2005 Linda W. Pratt1 Keali`i F. Bio2 James D. Jacobi1 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Kilauea Field Station, P.O. Box 44, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 2 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, P.O. Box 44, Hawai‘i National Park, HI 96718 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 September 2012 This product was prepared under Cooperative Agreement CA03WRAG0036 for the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey. Technical Report HCSU-032 SURVEY OF ROADSIDE ALIEN PLANTS IN HAWAI`I VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK AND ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS 2001–2005 1 2 1 LINDA W. PRATT , KEALI`I F. BIO , AND JAMES D. JACOBI 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Kīlauea Field Station, P.O. Box 44, Hawai`i Volcanoes National Park, HI 96718 2 Hawaii Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Hawai`i at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 Hawai`i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai`i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 September 2012 This article has been peer reviewed and approved for publication consistent with USGS Fundamental Science Practices ( http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1367/ ). Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. -
Koster's Curse (448) Relates To: Weeds
Pacific Pests, Pathogens & Weeds - Fact Sheets https://apps.lucidcentral.org/ppp/ Koster's curse (448) Relates to: Weeds Photo 1. Mass of seedlings of Koster's curse, Clidemia Photo 2. Leaves, Koster's curse, Clidemia hirta. Note, hirta. the distinctive veins patterns. Photo 3. Flowers, Koster's curse, Clidemia hirta. Note, Photo 4. Flowers and developing fruits, Koster's curse, the five petals. Clidemia hirta. Photo 6. Flowers and fruits, Koster's curse, Clidemia Photo 5. Flowers and fruits, Koster's curse, Clidemia hirta. Note, the claw-like stamens, and hairs on the hirta. fruits. Photo 7. Fruits, Koster's curse, Clidemia hirta, showing hairs and bristles on fruits and leaf stalks. Common Name Koster's curse; it is also known as soapbush. Scientific Name Clidemia hirta. It was known previously as Clidemia elegans, Melastoma elegans. It is a member of the Melastomataceae. Distribution Widespread. Asia, East Africa, South and Southeast Asia, North, South and Central America, the Caribbean, Oceania. It is recorded from Australia, American Samoa, Fiji, Guam, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Vanuatu, and Wallis and Futuna. Koster's curse is native to much of tropical America. Invasiveness & Habitat An extremely important invasive weed, and especially a threat to Pacific islands. Koster's curse forms dense thickets that smother plantations, pastures and native vegetation, but it is also found in open grasslands, roadsides, open woodlands, banks of streams and rivers, forest margins and rainforests (Photo 1). The weed invades both disturbed and undisturbed areas, but it is especially problematic after storms, feral pig damage, landslides and fire. -
Restricted Invasive Plants of Queensland
Restricted invasive plants Restricted invasive plants of Queensland Restricted invasive plants of Queensland Hudson pear (Cylindropuntia rosea syn. Cylindropuntia pallida) Fireweed (Senecio madagascariensis) Mother-of-millions (Kalanchoe delagoense) Bunny ears (Opuntia microdasys) The new Biosecurity Act The Biosecurity Act 2014 protects Queensland’s economy, Species not listed as restricted may be listed as prohibited biodiversity and people’s lifestyles from the threats posed under the Act or may be listed by a local government level by invasive pests and diseases under local laws. Under the Act, certain species of invasive plants are listed Australian Government legislation administered by the as ‘restricted’ biosecurity matter. Australian Department of Agriculture also applies to the import of all plants into Australia. What is restricted matter? • Mexican bean tree (Cecropia pachystachya, C. palmata and C. peltata) Restricted matter is listed in the Act and includes a range • Mexican feather grass (Nassella tenuissima) of invasive plants that are present in Queensland. These invasive plants are having significant adverse impacts • miconia (M. calvescens, M. cionotricha, M. nervosa in Queensland and it is desirable to manage them and and M. racemosa) prevent their spread, thereby protecting un-infested • mikania vine (Mikania micrantha) parts of the State. • mimosa pigra (Mimosa pigra) The Act requires everyone to take all reasonable and practical measures to minimise the biosecurity risks • bunny ears (Opuntia microdasys) associated with invasive plants and animals under • riverina prickly pear (Opunita elata) their control. This is called a general biosecurity obligation (GBO). • water mimosa (Neptunia oleracea and N. plena). The specific restriction requirements also apply to a Restricted invasive plants that are person when dealing with restricted invasive matter. -
Cryptostegia Spp. Rubber Vine Asclepiadaceae
Cryptostegia spp. Rubber vine Asclepiadaceae Forest Starr, Kim Starr, and Lloyd Loope United States Geological Survey--Biological Resources Division Haleakala Field Station, Maui, Hawai'i January, 2003 OVERVIEW Cryptostegia species, C. grandiflora and C. madagascariensis, are widely cultivated and have become pests in places where they are introduced, including Australia, where C. grandiflora has been called one of their worst weeds, and in Florida, where C. madagascariensis is considered a category II weed by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. On Maui, the distribution of Cryptostegia spp. is still small and the species are only sparingly naturalized in two locations. Cryptostegia is also sparingly naturalized in Kawaihae, Hawai'i, and likely cultivated at least on O'ahu and possibly other Hawaiian Islands. Because of its weedy history and limited distribution on Maui, Cryptostegia spp. has been targeted by the Maui Invasive Species Committee (MISC) for eradication. Hopefully, this invader will be stopped before it is rampant and widespread. Controlling this aggressive vine now could potentially save large amounts of resources, time, and money in the future. TAXONOMY Family: Asclepiadaceae (milkweed family) (Neal 1965). Latin name: Cryptostegia grandiflora R. Br. and Cryptostegia madagascariensis Bojer. (Bailey and Bailey 1976). Synonyms: Nerium grandiflorum Roxb. ex R. Br. (PLANTS 2001). Common names: Rubber vine, India rubber vine, Palay rubber vine (Neal 1965, Bailey and Bailey 1976, PLANTS 2001). Taxonomic notes: Cyrptostegia is within the milkweed family, Asclepiadaceae, which includes about 220 gernera and 2,000 species of perennial herbs, shrubs, and vines, with milky juice (Neal 1965). The genus, Cyrptostegia, is made up of probably three species of woody lianas with milky sap, native to tropical Africa and Madagascar (Bailey and Bailey 1976). -
Leonotis Nepetifolia (Lion's Ear)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 2008. Predicting Invasive Plants in Florida using the Australian Weed Risk Assessment. Invasive Plant Science and Management 1: 178-195. Leonotis nepetifolia (lion's ear) Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown? 1.03 Does the species have weedy races? 2.01 Species suited to Florida's USDA climate zones (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) 2 2.02 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) 2 2.03 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) 2.04 Native or naturalized in habitats with periodic inundation 2.05 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural y range? 3.01 Naturalized beyond native range y 0 3.02 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed y 0 3.03 Weed of agriculture y 0 3.04 Environmental weed n 0 3.05 Congeneric weed y 0 4.01 Produces spines, thorns or burrs n 0 4.02 Allelopathic n 0 4.03 Parasitic n 0 4.04 Unpalatable to grazing animals 4.05 Toxic to animals n 0 4.06 Host for recognised pests and pathogens 4.07 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans n 0 4.08 Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems n 0 4.09 Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle y 1 4.1 Grows on infertile soils (oligotrophic, limerock, or excessively draining soils) y 1 4.11 Climbing or smothering growth habit n 0 4.12 Forms -
MNES Threatened Species Dossier, Part 1
EPBC Referral – Threatened Species Dossier ABP Project ARROW BOWEN PIPELINE EPBC MNES Threatened Species Dossiers EPBC Referral – Threatened Species Dossier ABP Project Table of Contents 1 Flora ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Dichanthium queenslandicum (King Blue-grass) ................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Conservation status ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Description ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.3 Distribution ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.4 Habitat ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.5 Ecology ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1.6 Survey effort and methods undertaken for ABP ................................................................................ 3 1.1.7 Threats .............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1.8 -
Morphoanatomical Study of Clidemia Hirta (L.) D. Don. Estudo Morfoanatômico De Clidemia Hirta (L.) D
Research, Society and Development, v. 10, n. 7, e1310716159, 2021 (CC BY 4.0) | ISSN 2525-3409 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16159 Morphoanatomical study of Clidemia hirta (L.) D. Don. Estudo morfoanatômico de Clidemia hirta (L.) D. Don. Estudio morfoanatómico de Clidemia hirta (L.) D. Don. Received: 05/16/2021 | Reviewed: 05/25/2021 | Accept: 05/26/2021 | Published: 06/11/2021 Tatiane Mendonça da Silva ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3553-901X Universidade Federal de Goiás, Brazil E-mail: [email protected] Heleno Dias Ferreira ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7763-734X Universidade Federal de Goiás, Brazil E-mail: [email protected] José Realino de Paula ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4424-7692 Universidade Federal de Goiás, Brazil E-mail: [email protected] Tatiana de Sousa Fiuza ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0135-177X Universidade Federal de Goiás, Brazil E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The aims of this study were: to carry out the morphological study of the Clidemia hirta (L.) D. Don, the anatomical study of the leaves and young stem and the phytochemical screening of the powder of the leaves. The leaves were collected monthly at Bosque Auguste de Saint-Hilaire, Conservation Unit on Campus II of the Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, for 12 months. The specie was identified and a voucher specime deposited in the Herbarium of UFG (66 872- UFG). Morphoanatomical analysis was performed according to conventional techniques. It was verified at phytochemical screening, the presence de anthraquinone heterosides, starch, alkaloids, flavonoid and saponins. -
Cryptostegia Grandiflora Global Invasive Species Database (GISD)
FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Cryptostegia grandiflora Cryptostegia grandiflora System: Terrestrial Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Plantae Magnoliophyta Magnoliopsida Gentianales Asclepiadaceae Common name India rubber vine (English), caucho de la India (Spanish, Galapagos), rubber vine (English), palay rubber vine (English), purple allamanda (English), liane de gatope (French, New Caledonia) Synonym Nerium grandiflorum , Roxb. ex R. Br. Similar species Summary Cryptostegia grandiflora is a self supporting, many-stemmed vine that is capable of growing over trees up to 15m high, smothering and pulling them down. It occurs in dry and moist forests in disturbed situations where there is temporary or permanent water, such as in rainforest openings and along roadsides. C. grandiflora is poisonous to stock when consumed and it forms impenetrable thickets that may restrict stock access to water. It decreases water catchments due to increased transpiration resulting in a loss of trees and native vines, which in turn leads to a loss of biodiversity and habitat. view this species on IUCN Red List Species Description Cryptostegia grandiflora, is a self supporting, scrambling, many-stemmed vine that grows to 2 metres tall with long trailing whips. A milky sap oozes from stems, leaves and seedpods when cut or broken. Leaves are dark green and glossy, 6-10cm long, 3-5cm wide and in opposite pairs. Roots have been found at a depth of 13 metres in mine shafts. Roots of seedlings are twice as long as shoots. The growth form of the vine differs depending on the surrounding conditions. They can form dense canopies of overpapping plants with long whips, form towers upto 30mts high the height of native trees and grow as freestanding shrubs in the absence of other vegetation. -
Plant List 2021-08-25 (12:18)
Plant List 2021-09-24 (14:25) Plant Plant Name Botanical Name in Price Stock Per Unit AFRICAN DREAM ROOT - 1 Silene capensis Yes R92 AFRICAN DREAM ROOT - 2 Silene undulata Yes R92 AFRICAN POTATO Hypoxis hemerocallidea Yes R89 AFRICAN POTATO - SILVER-LEAFED STAR FLOWER Hypoxis rigidula Yes R89 AGASTACHE - GOLDEN JUBILEE Agastache foeniculum No R52 AGASTACHE - HYSSOP, WRINKLED GIANT HYSSOP Agastache rugosa Yes R59 AGASTACHE - LICORICE MINT HYSSOP Agastache rupestris No R59 AGASTACHE - PINK POP Agastache astromontana No R54 AGRIMONY Agrimonia eupatoria No R54 AJWAIN Trachyspermum ammi No R49 ALFALFA Medicago sativa Yes R59 ALOE VERA - ORANGE FLOWER A. barbadensis Yes R59 ALOE VERA - YELLOW FLOWER syn A. barbadensis 'Miller' No R59 AMARANTH - ‘LOVE-LIES-BLEEDING’ Amaranthus caudatus No R49 AMARANTH - CHINESE SPINACH Amaranthus species No R49 AMARANTH - GOLDEN GIANT Amaranthus cruentas No R49 AMARANTH - RED LEAF Amaranthus cruentas No R49 ARTICHOKE - GREEN GLOBE Cynara scolymus Yes R54 ARTICHOKE - JERUSALEM Helianthus tuberosus Yes R64 ARTICHOKE - PURPLE GLOBE Cynara scolymus No R54 ASHWAGANDA, INDIAN GINSENG Withania somniferia Yes R59 ASPARAGUS - GARDEN Asparagus officinalis Yes R54 BALLOON FLOWER - PURPLE Platycodon grandiflorus 'Apoyama' Yes R59 BALLOON FLOWER - WHITE Platycodon grandiflorus var. Albus No R59 BASIL - CAMPHOR Ocimum kilimandscharicum Yes R59 BASIL HOLY - GREEN TULSI, RAM TULSI Ocimum Sanctum Yes R54 BASIL HOLY - TULSI KAPOOR Ocimum sanctum Linn. No R54 BASIL HOLY - TULSI TEMPERATE Ocimum africanum No R54 BASIL HOLY - TULSI -
Review and Status of Biological Control of Clidemia in Hawaici
REVIEW AND STATUS OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF CLIDEMIA IN HAWAICI Larry M. Nakahara, Robert Me Burkhart, and George Ye Funasaki ABSTRACT Efforts to control clidemia (Clidemia hirta) in Hawai'i with phytophagous insects began in 1952. Several attempts have been made since then to introduce potential biological control agents to reduce the spread of this weed into forest areas, and other control measures have been tried by various groups and agencies. It was not until recently, however, through the enactment of significant legislation and subsequent funding, that explorations and studies were conducted specifically on clidemia insects in Trinidad, West Indies. Fourteen species of insects were evaluated, including Carposina bullata, Mompha bithalama, a midge or cecidomyiid, two Eurytoma species, Piesmopoda sp., and Compsolechia seductella, which feed on the flowers and fruits; Lius poseidon, Antiblemma acclinalis, Druentia sp., prob. inscita, Ategumia matutinalis (formerly Blepharomastix ebulealis but originally thought to be Sylepte matutinalis), Penestes n. sp., and a leaf beetle or chrysomelid, which feed on the leaves; and a long-horned cerambycid beetle, which bores into the stem. Studies indicated that several species were sufficiently host specific to warrant introduction into Hawai'i for the biological control of clidemia. INTRODUCTION In Hawai'i, clidemia or Koster's curse (Clidemia hirta) (Melastomataceae), a fast-growing, hea -seeding, tropical American shrub, has colonized forest clearings, trailsi7 es, and bum sites and intruded into the understories of forests that were formerly free of introduced, or alien, weeds (Wester and Wood 1977). The species has spread rapidly throughout the State and re resents a serious threat to our native forests.