DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Expert Consultation on Underutilized Crops for Food and Nutritional Security in Asia and the Pacific

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Expert Consultation on Underutilized Crops for Food and Nutritional Security in Asia and the Pacific Regional Expert Consultation on Underutilized Crops for Food and Nutritional Security in Asia and the Pacific Bangkok, Thailand, November 13-15, 2017 Thematic, Strategic Papers and Country Status Reports Citation: R.K. Tyagi, A. Pandey, A. Agrawal, K.S. Varaprasad, R.S. Paroda, R.K. Khetarpal (2018) Regional Expert Consultation on Underutilized Crops for Food and Nutritional Security in Asia and the Pacific – Thematic, Strategic Papers and Country Status Reports. Asia-Pacific Association for Agricultural Research Institutions (APAARI), Bangkok, Thailand, November 13-15, 2017, x+349 p. Cover page photo identity: Front cover page: Amaranthus caudatus (chaulai) Back cover page: Carissa carandas (karonda) (Photo credit: Dr K.C. Bhatt, NBPGR, New Delhi, India) Editors: Rishi Kumar Tyagi, Anjula Pandey, Anuradha Agrawal, K.S. Varaprasad, Raj S. Paroda, Ravi K. Khetarpal Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis with full responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions with the authors and not on the editors. Some contents of chapters have been sourced by the authors from their prior publications, and APAARI is not liable for any copyright infringement whatsoever. Published by: Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions (APAARI) 2nd and 4th Floor, FAO Annex Building 202/1 Larn Luang Road Pomprab Sattrupai District, Bangkok 10100, Thailand ISBN: 978-616-7101-10-1 Copyright © APAARI For copies, please contact: The Executive Secretary Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions (APAARI) 2nd and 4th Floor, FAO Annex Building 202/1 Larn Luang Road Pomprab Sattrupai District, Bangkok 10100, Thailand Phone: +662-2822918; Fax: +662-2822920 Email: [email protected]; Website: http://www.apaari.org Contents Foreword iii Acknowledgements v The Organizers vii Thematic Papers 1. Are Neglected Plants the Food for the Future? 1 S. Baldermann, L. Blagojević, K. Frede, R. Klopsch, S. Neugart, A. Neumann, B. Ngwene, J. Norkeweit, D. Schröter, A. Schröter, F.J. Schweigert, M. Wiesner and M. Schreiner 2. Crops for the Future: Agricultural Diversification to 2017 and Beyond 20 Sayed Azam-Ali, Peter Gregory, Sue Azam-Ali and Max Herriman 3. Underutilized Plant Species in Asia-Pacific Region 27 Anjula Pandey 4. Grasspea: A Neglected but Important Pulse Crop for Nutritional Security of Low-Income People 41 Ashutosh Sarker and A.H. Rizvi 5. Nutritionally Rich Underutilized Vegetables - Recapturing Vegetable Phytonutrients for Healthier Diets 47 Ray-Yu Yang 6. Wild Edible Plants in Asia-Pacific: A Case Study with Bastar Tribal Pockets in Chhattisgarh, India 54 Umesh Srivastava, Kailash Chand Bhatt and Anjula Pandey 7. Biofortification in Underutilized Staple Crops for Nutrition in Asia and Africa 70 Wolfgang Pfeiffer, Meike Andersson, M. Govindaraj, Parminder Virk, Binu Cherian, Paul Illona, Sylvia Magezi and Joseph Mulambu 8. Knowledge Management Resources in CABI for Underutilized Crops 82 A. Sivapragasam and Fook Wing Chan 9. Forecast Application for Risk Management in Agriculture: Case Study from Tamil Nadu, India 92 Anshul Agarwal, G. Srinivasan and Dash Itesh Strategic Papers 1. Strategies on Underutilized Crops for Food and Nutritional Security: Pseudocereals 101 Kuldeep Singh, Shashi Bhalla, B.S. Phogat, Mohar Singh, J.C. Rana and Kalyani Srinivasan 2. Underutilized Climate-Smart Nutrient Rich Small Millets for Food and Nutritional Security 109 Hari D. Upadhyaya and Mani Vetriventhan 3. Underutilized Grain Legumes: Rice Bean, Moth Bean, Adzuki Bean, Faba Bean and Horse Gram 121 J.C. Rana, N.K. Krishna Kumar, Mohar Singh, Rashmi Yadav, Kuldeep Tripathi, Rakesh Bhardwaj and Gayacharan 4. Root and Tuber Crops for Food and Nutritional Security - Perspective from Oceania 137 Arshni Shandil 5. Underutilized Tropical and Subtropical Fruits for Nutrition and Health Security and Climate Resilience - A Bioversity International Initiative 146 Dandin S.B. and N.K. Krishna Kumar Thematic, Strategic Papers and Country Reports iii 6. Potential of Seabuckthorn (Hippophae L.) - A Multipurpose Underutilized Crop of Dry Temperate Himalayas 156 Virendra Singh, Poonam Thakur and Kusum Country Status Reports – South Asia 1. Bangladesh 171 R.R. Saha and B.R. Banik 2. Bhutan 184 Kailash Pradhan 3. India 193 B.S. Phogat, V.A. Tonapi, Shiv Sewak, Kuldeep Singh and Trilochan Mohapatra 4. Iran 215 Darab Hassani 5. Sri Lanka 221 J.D.H. Wijewardena 6. Nepal 230 Baidya Nath Mahto, Narayan Bahadur Dhami, Prem Bahadur Magar and Suk Bahadur Gurung 7. Pakistan 242 Abdul Ghafoor and Nadar Khan Country Status Reports – South-East Asia 8. Lao PDR 253 Bounthong Bouahom, Khamphou Phouyyavong and Siviengkhek Phommalath 9. Malaysia 260 Mohamad Roff Mohd. Noor 10. Thailand 272 Nuengruethai Srithornrath, Rassamee Simma and Udomwit Vaidhayakarn 11. Vietnam 275 Pham Hung Cuong 12. The Philippines 289 Reynaldo V. Ebora, Jocelyn E. Eusebio, Leilani D. Pelegrina and Ma Cecilia S. Alaban 13. Taiwan 299 Ien-Chie Wen Country Status Reports – The Pacific 14. Fiji 305 Savenaca Cuquma 15. Papua New Guinea 314 Birte Komolong 16. Samoa 330 Moafanua Tolo Iosefa Appendix 1 – Technical Programme 336 Appendix 2 – Participants 341 Regional Expert Consultation on Underutilized Crops for Food and Nutritional Security iv in Asia and the Pacific Foreword APAARI under its programme on Asia-Pacific Consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology and Bioresources (APCoAB), jointly organized a Regional Expert Consultation on “Underutilized Crops for Food and Nutritional Security in Asia and the Pacific” in collaboration with Council of Agriculture, Taiwan during November 13-15, 2017 at Bangkok, Thailand. The Expert Consultation was also sponsored by six other Institutions. Deliberations of Expert Consultation are being published in two parts: the first being “Proceedings and Recommendations” and the second on “Thematic, Strategic and Country Status Reports on Underutilized Crops of Asia-Pacific Region” for use more as ready reference. Content and style of presentations in the second publication have been retained as submitted by the contributors particularly with reference to reports of Thailand and Taiwan. The second publication consists of 9 thematic papers, 6 strategic papers and 16 country status reports. Two of the thematic papers (presented by Dr Benard, Mr Herriman) and one strategic paper (presented by Dr N.K. Krishna Kumar) were published earlier and have been reproduced with permission of the authors. Short bioparagraphs of all the presenters have been embedded in their respective papers/reports. Remaining participants contact details have been included in an Appendix. However, the editors put efforts to maintain continuity, uniformity and enhance understanding. Although, proceedings and recommendations are part of the first publication, however, if a country specific work plan needs to be developed, status and gaps presented in each country status report are extremely useful. Thematic and strategy papers have been planned to comprehensively cover aspects of underutilized crops (UUC). Analysis of these papers would help in generating new ideas to promote UUC. The terms UUC, underutilized species (UUS) and neglected and underutilized species (NUS) have been largely used synonymously in both the publications. There are several listed crops in these reports that can be considered as UUC universally. However, some of the major staple food crops have been categorized as underutilized in certain countries. Considering the status and need in such countries, categorization presented by the countries is respected and retained. Learning lessons and success stories included in some of the country status reports will be of great help to other countries in the region. Leadership and relevant authorities in countries are expected to study both the publications while developing plans for their countries to enhance the nutritional, economic and environmental security by promoting UUC. I am happy to state that APAARI with active support from members is committed to implement the recommendations made collectively by the experts and presented in the first publication to achieve SDGs 2, 3 and 13 in the Asia Pacific Region. Ravi Khetarpal Executive Secretary, APAARI Thematic, Strategic Papers and Country Reports v Acknowledgements On behalf of APAARI and its programme APCoAB, it’s a great pleasure to place on record appreciation to all the co-organizers, participants, service providers and staff who contributed in the successful organization of the ‘Regional Expert Consultation on Underutilized Crops for Food and Nutritional Security in the Asia-Pacific Region’ held at Bangkok from November 13-15, 2017. This document is the second publication emanating from the presentations made during Expert Consultation. We are extremely grateful to all the 16 countries, namely, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Fiji, India, Iran, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, PNG, Samoa, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam for deputing the Heads and/or the representatives of their respective National Agricultural Research Systems (NARS), besides Subject Experts from various organizations. They have contributed in providing important thematic and strategic papers on underutilized crops and respective Country Status Reports in relation to the theme of the Expert Consultation. All the authors, as well as their co-authors, are sincerely thanked for providing very useful and comprehensive information, which has been encapsulated in this publication. A few individuals
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 62 of 17 January 2018 Replacing Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council
    23.1.2018 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 18/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2018/62 of 17 January 2018 replacing Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof, Whereas: (1) The products of plant and animal origin to which the maximum residue levels of pesticides (‘MRLs’) set by Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 apply, subject to the provisions of that Regulation, are listed in Annex I to that Regulation. (2) Additional information should be provided by Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as regards the products concerned, in particular as regards the synonyms used to indicate the products, the scientific names of the species to which the products belong and the part of the product to which the respective MRLs apply. (3) The text of footnote (1) in both Part A and Part B of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 should be reworded, in order to avoid ambiguity and different interpretations encountered with the current wording. (4) New footnotes (3) and (4) should be inserted in Part A of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, in order to provide additional information as regards the part of the product to which the MRLs of the products concerned apply (5) New footnote (7) should be inserted in Part A of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, in order to clarify that MRLs of honey are not applicable to other apiculture products due to their different chemicals character­ istics.
    [Show full text]
  • Taro: Postharvest Quality-Maintenance Guidelines
    Vegetable and Root Crops January 2015 VC-5 Taro: Postharvest Quality-Maintenance Guidelines Robert E. Paull1 and Ching Cheng Chen2 1Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Hawai‘i at Mänoa 2Department of Horticulture, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan aro is one of the oldest food crops, widely dis- tributed throughout tropical Africa, Asia, and the Pacific.T It is the fifth most important root crop grown in the world. There is also substantial production in Egypt and the Caribbean (O’Hare and Asokan 1986). The root, also called a corm or tuber, as well as the petioles and leaves are consumed. All parts of the plant must be cooked prior to eating because of the acridity associ- ated with a compound on the calcium oxalate crystals (raphides) that it contains (Paull et al. 1999). The corm is high in starch and low in protein and fat. The plant is also known as kalo, tannier, malanga, dasheen, ed- doe, and cocoyam. There are numerous varieties (up to 600), in which corm flesh color varies from white to yellow, orange, and red, to purple. In Hawai‘i, the most From Lebot (2009); used with the permission of the common variety sold to consumers is the Chinese type author. ‘Bun-Long’ or ‘Bin Liang’, which has white flesh with obvious purple fibers and lower acridity than other varieties. For poi, ‘Lehua Maoli’, with its purplish flesh smaller taro type possesses some degree of dormancy, and dark purple fibers, is common. while there is no dormancy in the larger taro corms.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Eddoe Taro in China Using Genome-Wide SNP Markers
    Genetic diversity and population structure of eddoe taro in China using genome-wide SNP markers Zhixin Wang*, Yalin Sun*, Xinfang Huang, Feng Li, Yuping Liu, Honglian Zhu, Zhengwei Liu and Weidong Ke Wuhan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China * These authors contributed equally to this work. ABSTRACT Taro (Colocasia esculenta) is an important root and tuber crop cultivated worldwide. There are two main types of taro that vary in morphology of corm and cormel, `dasheen' and `eddoe'. The eddoe type (Colocasia esculenta var. antiquorium) is predominantly distributed throughout China. Characterizing the genetic diversity present in the germplasm bank of taro is fundamental to better manage, conserve and utilize the genetic resources of this species. In this study, the genetic diversity of 234 taro accessions from 16 provinces of China was assessed using 132,869 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers identified by specific length amplified fragment-sequencing (SLAF-seq). Population structure and principal component analysis permitted the accessions to be categorized into eight groups. The genetic diversity and population differentiation of the eight groups were evaluated using the characterized SNPs. Analysis of molecular variance showed that the variation among eight inferred groups was higher than that within groups, while a relatively small variance was found among the two morphological types and 16 collection regions. Further, a core germplasm set comprising 41 taro acces- sions that maintained the genetic diversity
    [Show full text]
  • Part B Other Products Referred to in Article 2(1)
    Part B Other products referred to in Article 2(1) Other products References to Part A to which the same MRLs apply (1) Main product of the group or subgroup Code number Category Code number or Common names/synonyms Scientific names Name of the group or subgroup 0110010-001 Natsudaidais Citrus natsudaidai 0110010-002 Shaddocks/pomelos Citrus maxima; syn: Citrus grandis 0110010-003 Sweeties/oroblancos Citrus grandis x Citrus paradisi 0110010 Grapefruits 0110010-004 Tangelolos Citrus paradisi x tangelo 0110010-005 Tangelos (except minneolas)/Ugli® Citrus tangelo 0110010-990 Other hybrids of Citrus paradisi , not elsewhere mentioned 0110020-001 Bergamots Citrus bergamia 0110020-002 Bitter oranges/sour oranges Citrus aurantium 0110020-003 Blood oranges Citrus sinensis 0110020 Oranges 0110020-004 Cara caras Citrus sinensis 0110020-005 Chinottos Citrus myrtifolia 0110020-006 Trifoliate oranges Poncirus trifoliata 0110020-990 Other hybrids of Citrus sinensis, not elsewhere mentioned 0110030-001 Buddha's hands/Buddha's fingers Citrus medica var. sarcodactyla 0110030 Lemons 0110030-002 Citrons Citrus medica 0110040-001 Indian sweet limes/Palestine sweet limes Citrus limettioides 0110040-002 Kaffir limes Citrus hystrix 0110040 Limes 0110040-003 Sweet limes/mosambis Citrus limetta 0110040-004 Tahiti limes Citrus latifolia 0110040-005 Limequats Citrus aurantiifolia x Fortunella spp. 0110050-001 Calamondins Citrus madurensis 0110050-002 Clementines Citrus clementina 0110050-003 Cleopatra mandarins Citrus reshni 0110050-004 Minneolas Citrus tangelo 0110050 Mandarins 0110050-005 Satsumas/clausellinas Citrus unshiu 0110050-006 Tangerines/dancy mandarins Citrus tangerina 0110050-007 Tangors Citrus nobilis 0110050-990 Other hybrids of Citrus reticulata , not elsewhere mentioned 0120010-001 Apricot kernels Armeniaca vulgaris; syn: Prunus armeniaca 0120010-002 Bitter almonds Amygdalus communis var.
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases of Edible Aroids in India and Their Management
    Diseases of Edible Aroids in India and Aroids: Plants belonging to the family Araceae their Management Among cultivable tropical tuber crops, the following are commercially cultivated edible aroids in India: 1. Amorphophalus paeoniifolius 2. Colocasia (C.esculenta var.esculenta and C.esculenta R.S.Misra var.antiquorum): Dasheen and Eddoe types Central Tuber Crops Research Institute Trivandrum (India) 3. Xanthosoma (Tannia) 4. Alocasia Amorphophallus tubers Amorphophallus mosaic disease and crop 1 Amorphophallus Mosaic Disease Collar rot of Amorphophallus Primary spread is through planting material. Secondary spread of the disease is through insect vectors, Myzus persicae Sulz., Aphis gossypii Glover, A. craccivora Koch. and Pentalonia nigronervosa coq. Disease symptoms include mosaic mottling of leaves and distortion of leaf lamina. Corms produced by the mottled plants are much smaller than those without mottled leaves. Management: Use of virus free planting material, spraying of systemic insecticides to prevent secondary spread Leaf blight caused by Phytophthora colocasiae Storage diseases in Amorphophallus 2 Management of Amorphophallus Diseases Major taro types in India •Use of healthy planting material without any apparent rotting symptoms •Treatment of the whole/cut tubers with cow-dung slurry mixed with Trichoderma before planting •Application of Trichoderma enriched compost in pits/field •Application of neem-cake @ 250g/pit •One foliar spray with Mancozeb (0.2%) and fenithrion (0.05%) at 60 and 90 DAP Taro Cultivation Field view
    [Show full text]
  • Taro Systematik Unterklasse: Froschlöffelähnliche (Alismatidae
    Taro Taro (Colocasia esculenta) Systematik Unterklasse: Froschlöffelähnliche (Alismatidae) Ordnung: Froschlöffelartige (Alismatales) Familie: Aronstabgewächse (Araceae) Unterfamilie: Aroideae Gattung: Colocasia Art: Taro Wissenschaftlicher Name Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott Traditioneller Taroanbau auf Terrassen aus Lavagestein auf der Insel Kauaʻi Taro (Colocasia esculenta) ist eine Nutzpflanze aus der Familie der Aronstabgewächse (Araceae), die seit mehr als 2000 Jahren als Nahrungspflanze kultiviert wird. Ein anderer Name für Taro ist Wasserbrotwurzel. In alten Nachschlagewerken, wie z. B. Pierer's Universal-Lexikon findet sich für die Pflanze auch die Bezeichnung Tarro. Genutzt werden vorwiegend die stärkehaltigen Rhizome der Pflanze. Sie werden wie Kartoffeln gekocht. In den Anbauländern werden auch die Blätter und Blattstiele als Gemüse gegessen. Sie enthalten viel Mineralien, Vitamin A, B und C. Taro wird heute weltweit in feuchten, tropischen und subtropischen Klimazonen angebaut. Für den Export wird er in Ägypten, Costa Rica, der Karibik, Brasilien und Indien angepflanzt. In Hawaii ist die dort kalo[1] genannte Pflanze eine der wichtigsten traditionellen Nutzpflanzen. Aus den Rhizomen wird poi, eine Paste, hergestellt. Die Aborigines in Australien nutzen diese Pflanze um daraus Busch-Brot zu backen, indem sie aus dem Rhizom Mehl herstellten. Siehe auch [Bearbeiten] Sumpfpflanzen Wasserpflanzen Weblinks [Bearbeiten] Rhizome der Taro Commons: Taro – Album mit Bildern, Videos und Audiodateien Taro – eine Nahrungs- und eine Giftpflanze Beschreibung und Verwendungsmöglichkeit Einzelnachweise [Bearbeiten] 1. ↑ taro, kalo in Hawaiian Dictionaries Von „http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taro― Kategorien: Aronstabgewächse | Nutzpflanze | Blattgemüse | Wurzelgemüse Taro From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is about the plant. For other uses, see Taro (disambiguation). It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Colocasia esculenta.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Expert Consultation on Underutilized Crops for Food and Nutritional Security in Asia and the Pacific
    Regional Expert Consultation on Underutilized Crops for Food and Nutritional Security in Asia and the Pacific Bangkok, Thailand, November 13-15, 2017 Thematic, Strategic Papers and Country Status Reports Citation: R.K. Tyagi, A. Pandey, A. Agrawal, K.S. Varaprasad, R.S. Paroda, R.K. Khetarpal (2018) Regional Expert Consultation on Underutilized Crops for Food and Nutritional Security in Asia and the Pacific – Thematic, Strategic Papers and Country Status Reports. Asia-Pacific Association for Agricultural Research Institutions (APAARI), Bangkok, Thailand, November 13-15, 2017, x+349 p. Cover page photo identity: Front cover page: Amaranthus caudatus (chaulai) Back cover page: Carissa carandas (karonda) (Photo credit: Dr K.C. Bhatt, NBPGR, New Delhi, India) Editors: Rishi Kumar Tyagi, Anjula Pandey, Anuradha Agrawal, K.S. Varaprasad, Raj S. Paroda, Ravi K. Khetarpal Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis with full responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions with the authors and not on the editors. Some contents of chapters have been sourced by the authors from their prior publications, and APAARI is not liable for any copyright infringement whatsoever. Published by: Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions (APAARI) 2nd and 4th Floor, FAO Annex Building 202/1 Larn Luang Road Pomprab Sattrupai District, Bangkok 10100, Thailand ISBN: 978-616-7101-10-1 Copyright © APAARI For copies, please contact: The Executive Secretary Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions (APAARI) 2nd and 4th Floor, FAO Annex Building 202/1 Larn Luang Road Pomprab Sattrupai District, Bangkok 10100, Thailand Phone: +662-2822918; Fax: +662-2822920 Email: [email protected]; Website: http://www.apaari.org Contents Foreword iii Acknowledgements v The Organizers vii Thematic Papers 1.
    [Show full text]
  • CX/PR 18/50/8 March 2018 JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME CODEX COMMITTEE on PESTICIDE RESIDUES 50Th Session Haikou, PR
    E Agenda Item 7(c) CX/PR 18/50/8 March 2018 JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME CODEX COMMITTEE ON PESTICIDE RESIDUES 50th Session Haikou, PR. China, 9 - 14 April 2018 REVISION OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF FOOD AND FEED: IMPACT OF REVISED COMMODITY GROUPS AND SUBGROUPS IN TYPE 03 GRASSES, TYPE 04 NUTS, SEEDS AND SAPS AND TYPE 05 HERBS AND SPICES ON CODEX MRLS (Prepared by the Electronic Working Group chaired by the United States of America and co-chaired by the Netherlands) BACKGROUND 1. Background on the discussion of the revision of the Classification of Food and Feed (CXM 4-1989) can be found in the reports of the 36th – 49th sessions of the Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR) including relevant sessions of the Codex Alimentarius (CAC) held from 2004 to 2017.1 2. One of the terms of reference2 from CCPR49 (2017) was to consider how the Codex MRLs (CXLs) adopted by CAC and available in the existing Codex database for maximum residue limits (MRLs) for pesticides would be impacted by the revised commodity groups and subgroups in Types 03, 04 and 05. 3. The Committee has previously agreed that “no changes would be made to existing CXLs until such time as JMPR reviews were completed as per current procedures for the establishment of Codex schedules and priority list of pesticides. The Committee agreed that the same approach would be taken when reviewing other commodity groups in the database following the adoption of revised commodity groups in the Classification”.3 4. To achieve the above, a specific CXL at the level of the old group-CLX for the relocated commodity will keep its existing CXL, and at the same time the commodity will be excluded from the new group-CXL.
    [Show full text]
  • A Crop Production Technical Guide Eddoes
    A CROP PRODUCTION TECHNICAL GUIDE EDDOES (Colocasia esculenta var antiquorum) Prepared by Pathleen Titus, CARDI Caribbean Agricultural Research and Development Institute St. Vincent and the Grenadines May 2008 This document has been produced in collaboration with the North-South Institute with funding assistance from USAID as part of the Caribbean Trade Expansion Project (C-TEP) A CROP PRODUCTION TECHNICAL GUIDE EDDOES Prepared by Pathleen Titus, CARDI St. Vincent and the Grenadines Introduction Origin The Eddoe, Colocasia esculenta var antiquorum (a variety of the taro or dasheen), belongs to the Araceae family. It is a native of India and South East Asia. It is believed to have been first recorded by the Chinese 2000 years ago and is now grown throughout the humid tropics. Growth Habit The crop is considered a perennial but is cultivated as an annual for its edible tubers. In the case of eddoes, the central tuber is surrounded by a cluster of smaller tubers which are harvested. The dasheen on the other hand has a single tuber. The flesh of the eddoe is usually white but can be yellow, pink or orange. The taste is reported to be similar to the potato but with a nutty flavour. All tubers are said to contain calcium oxalate crystals and eddoes should always be cooked before eating. The starch molecules in the tubers are among the smallest in the plant kingdom making them easy to digest. Planting Material The non-marketable corm is usually used as planting material. The bigger corm shows high early vigour, competes well against weeds and can effectively use fertilizer.
    [Show full text]
  • Common African Pests and Diseases of Cassava, Yam, Sweet Potato and Cocoyam
    Common African Pests and Diseases of Cassava, Yam, Sweet Potato and Cocoyam edited by Robert L. Theberge The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture The Interna ti onal Institute of T rop ical Agriculture (IITA) is an a Ulonomous. nonprofil corporation governed by a IS-memher board o f trustees. lI TA was establis hed in 1967 by the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations. wh ich pro­ vided the initial capital fo r bui ldings and develop­ ment. and the Federal M ilitary Govcrnmenl of Nigeria. who all o tted 1.000 heclares of la nd for a headquarters sit e seven kil ometers north of Ibadan. IlTA seeks to develo p alternatives to shifting cu ltiv<it iol1 that will mainta in the pro ductivi ty of th e land under com inu ous cultivation in the humid and suhhurnid tropics: 10 develop higher yielding pest and disease resista nt varieties of cowpeas, yi:lms and sweet po tatoes worldwide; to increase production in maize, rice. cassava and soybeans in Africa: and to ~ t rc ngth c n national agricultural re search systems by a comprehensiv e training program and collahorative resea rch . II TA is one of 13 nonprofit international agri ( ul­ tural research and training centers supported by the Consult a tive Group for International Agricultural Research (CG IAR). The CGIAR is supported by the Food a nd Agricullure Organization of the United Nations (FAO). the International Bank for Reconstruction and continu(!d on inside bock ('o rer COMMON AFRICAN PESTS AND DISEASES of Cas",.a, Yam, Sweet Potato and Coeoyam COMMON AFRICAN PESTS AND DISEASES of Cassava, Yam, S weet Potato and Cocoyam edited by Robert L.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Residue Data Extrapolation and Crop Grouping
    PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS BOARD GUIDELINES FOR RESIDUE DATA EXTRAPOLATION AND CROP GROUPING PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS BOARD P.O BOX 13794 – 00800 LORESHO, NAIROBI, KENYA [email protected] | [email protected] http://www.pcpb.go.ke/ GUIDELINES FOR RESIDUE DATA EXTRAPOLATION AND CROP GROUPING | 1 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Rationale of Extrapolation .......................................................................................................................................... 3 General Principles ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Properties of active substances ............................................................................................................................. 4 Good Agricultural Practices ................................................................................................................................... 4 Situation of use .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Number of data sets ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Comparable residue behaviour in different crops ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CX/PR 18/50/7 February 2018 JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME CODEX COMMITTEE on PESTICIDE RESIDUES 50Th Session Haikou, PR
    E Agenda Item 7(b) CX/PR 18/50/7 February 2018 JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME CODEX COMMITTEE ON PESTICIDE RESIDUES 50th Session Haikou, PR. China, 9 - 14 April 2017 REVISION OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF FOOD AND FEED: CLASS A: PRIMARY FOOD COMMODITIES OF PLANT ORIGIN TYPE 05: HERBS AND SPICES GROUP 027 HERBS GROUP 028 SPICES (AT STEP 7) (Prepared by the Electronic Working Group chaired by the United States of America and co-chaired by the Netherlands) Codex members and Observers wishing to submit specific comments on Groups 027 and 028 should do so as instructed in CL 2018/20-PR. Circular letters are available on the Codex webpage/Circular Letters: http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/resources/circular-letters/en BACKGROUND 1. Background on the discussion of the revision of the Classification of Food and Feed (CXM 4-1989) can be found in the reports of the 36th – 49th sessions of the Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR) including relevant sessions of the Codex Alimentarius (CAC) held from 2004 to 2017.1 2. The practice adopted by the Committee in the revision of the Classification is to retain the revision of the commodity groups (e.g. fruit commodity groups, vegetable commodity groups, etc.) awaiting final compilation of the related commodity groups and the corresponding tables on examples of representative commodities for inclusion in the Classification of Food and Feed and the Principles and Guidance on the Selection of Representative Commodities for the Extrapolation of Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides to Commodity Groups (CXG 84-2012) respectively.
    [Show full text]