DOCSLIB.ORG

2013 Qualifier Standings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2013 Qualifier Standings No. Name Rate Pts TBrk1 TBrk2 TBrk3 TBrk4 Rnd1 Rnd2 Rnd3 Rnd4 Rnd5 1 Rajaganesh, Dhruv 454 5.0 14.0 16.5 15.0 55.0 W34 W58 W10 W29 W5 2 Senthilkumar, Girish 461 5.0 13.0 14.5 15.0 47.5 W122 W18 W32 W31 W6 3 Srinivasan, Arjun Balaji 642 5.0 12.5 13.5 15.0 45.0 W140 W111 W81 W8 W7 4 Kong, Ethan 336 4.5 11.5 13.5 12.5 43.5 D106 W89 W20 W59 W19 5 McQuillin, Danil 4.0 17.0 19.0 14.0 57.0 W16 W83 W12 W15 L1 6 Zhu, StePhen 379 4.0 16.5 19.5 14.0 55.0 W45 W50 W11 W14 L2 7 Leingang, Brooks 413 4.0 15.0 16.5 14.0 50.5 W113 W60 W9 W21 L3 8 Wood, Jacob 349 4.0 14.0 16.0 13.0 47.5 W25 W84 W82 L3 W43 9 Manish, Kunal 4.0 12.5 14.0 12.0 47.0 W99 W63 L7 W32 W35 10 Tammali, Vaishnavi 151 4.0 12.5 14.0 12.0 45.0 W135 W67 L1 W80 W30 11 Liu, Matthew 4.0 12.0 14.5 12.0 48.5 W68 W47 L6 W39 W33 12 Dickson, Davis 284 4.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 49.0 W30 W87 L5 W97 W37 13 Shi, Sophia 431 4.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 42.5 W40 W23 L31 W98 W46 14 Bitter, Alexander 4.0 12.0 13.5 13.0 44.5 W154 W86 W35 L6 W36 15 Fu, David 384 4.0 11.5 13.5 13.0 46.0 W93 W49 W79 L5 W31 16 Paxton, Walker 105 4.0 11.0 13.0 10.0 43.5 L5 W85 W84 W87 W42 17 Tong, Zachary 4.0 6.5 6.5 10.0 26.0 -N- W151 W134 W82 W29 18 Ivutin, Stefan 105 3.5 13.5 15.0 10.0 41.0 W107 L2 W99 D26 W58 19 Anand, Jackson 370 3.5 13.0 13.0 10.5 39.0 D109 W96 -X- W24 L4 20 Colbert, Sabu 3.5 12.0 14.0 9.5 42.0 D90 W95 L4 W73 W71 21 Ganesan, Akilan 315 3.5 12.0 13.5 12.5 44.0 W127 W100 W80 L7 D28 22 Ezhilmuthu, Damodar 3.5 11.5 14.0 10.5 41.0 W55 D33 D62 D44 W68 23 Walker, Ryan 105 3.5 11.5 13.5 9.5 38.5 W115 L13 D34 W94 W64 24 Brumfield, Thomson 229 3.5 11.0 12.5 11.5 39.5 W142 W103 D76 L19 W60 25 Hable, Christian 3.5 11.0 12.5 8.0 37.5 L8 D115 W120 W69 W70 26 Bakshi, Ashaar 673 3.5 11.0 11.0 9.0 30.5 -N- W137 W27 D18 W38 27 Hickson, Carter 3.5 10.5 11.0 9.5 31.5 D153 W88 L26 W115 W62 28 Kapgan, Andy 3.5 9.5 11.5 9.5 37.5 L79 W93 W149 W86 D21 29 Karnala, Tanish 200 3.0 15.0 17.0 12.0 49.5 W98 W65 W41 L1 L17 30 Deluryea, Nathan 3.0 14.5 16.5 9.0 43.0 L12 W147 W45 W51 L10 31 Godoy, Jessica Tyler 108 3.0 14.5 14.5 11.0 46.0 -X- W114 W13 L2 L15 32 Wiggins, Christian 110 3.0 14.0 16.0 10.0 49.0 W94 W48 L2 L9 W98 33 Bowling, Bryce 109 3.0 13.5 13.5 9.5 40.5 -X- D22 D109 W41 L11 34 Jahangir, Akeeb 3.0 13.0 14.5 8.0 40.5 L1 W122 D23 W125 D44 35 Rezaei, Naveed 325 3.0 13.0 13.5 11.0 45.0 W151 W37 L14 W81 L9 36 AmbadiPudi, Sreyasri 252 3.0 12.5 14.5 10.0 47.5 W38 L41 W96 W67 L14 37 Higginbotham, J.P 3.0 11.5 13.5 10.0 44.5 W101 L35 W63 W79 L12 38 Mehta, Rahul 3.0 11.5 13.5 9.0 37.5 L36 W107 W83 W47 L26 39 Honabach, Amelia 185 3.0 11.5 13.0 9.0 40.0 W121 L76 W103 L11 W87 40 Huang, Daniel 3.0 11.5 12.0 6.0 35.0 L13 L43 W156 W101 W81 41 Raguram, Dhriti 3.0 11.0 13.0 10.0 44.0 W66 W36 L29 L33 W83 42 Schuman, Ryan 349 3.0 11.0 12.5 10.0 36.0 D128 W133 D104 W90 L16 43 Dollar, Andrew 106 3.0 11.0 11.0 9.0 32.0 -N- W40 W112 W100 L8 44 Preyer, Andrew 174 3.0 10.5 12.0 8.5 35.0 L58 W126 W124 D22 D34 45 Bauer, Graham 3.0 10.5 12.0 7.0 37.5 L6 W154 L30 W118 W82 46 UmPhenour, Rider 107 3.0 10.5 11.5 9.0 33.5 L91 W136 W101 W104 L13 47 Curtin, Colin 109 3.0 10.5 10.5 8.0 32.5 -X- L11 W119 L38 W92 48 Chandra, Ankit 3.0 10.0 12.0 9.0 38.0 W85 L32 W61 L70 W97 49 Laney, Owen 101 3.0 10.0 11.0 8.0 35.5 W136 L15 L60 W117 W96 50 Rutter, Trey 3.0 10.0 10.0 8.0 30.5 W61 L6 -N- W142 W89 51 Daya, Esfan 150 3.0 9.5 9.5 9.0 25.5 W134 -N- W65 L30 W110 52 He, Jennifer 3.0 8.0 9.0 7.0 29.5 L63 D118 W141 D92 W86 53 Alexander, Nolan 510 3.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 26.0 -N- W113 L58 W124 W59 54 Foster, Roland 3.0 7.5 7.5 6.5 23.0 -F- D135 D66 W112 W79 55 Griffin, Cole 3.0 7.5 7.5 6.0 18.5 L22 -N- W155 W144 W85 56 Cole, Andrew 3.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 13.5 -N- -N- W151 W135 W80 57 Burnett, Walter 3.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 11.5 -N- -N- W143 W123 W90 58 Franks, Ben 2.5 10.0 17.5 9.0 48.5 W44 L1 W53 D68 L18 59 Resnick, Olivia 2.5 9.0 15.5 10.0 39.0 W147 D71 W69 L4 L53 60 Reynolds, Maximus 2.5 9.0 14.5 9.0 46.5 W118 L7 W49 D62 L24 61 Ericson, Samuel 2.5 8.5 14.0 6.5 31.5 L50 W148 L48 W105 D77 62 Rosetti, Sam 267 2.5 8.5 13.5 9.0 40.0 D120 W64 D22 D60 L27 63 Mcbride, Archer 298 2.5 8.5 13.5 7.5 40.5 W52 L9 L37 W138 D65 64 Vettickatt, Patrick 2.5 7.5 13.5 7.5 37.5 D104 L62 W108 W72 L23 65 De Dios, Agustin 2.5 7.5 12.5 7.5 35.5 W116 L29 L51 W148 D63 66 Song, Dylan 184 2.5 7.5 12.5 5.5 31.5 L41 D108 D54 D91 W128 67 Alsobrook, Cannon 2.5 7.5 12.0 8.5 34.5 W156 L10 W114 L36 D75 68 Schnell, Steven 196 2.5 7.5 12.0 8.0 37.0 L11 W152 W117 D58 L22 69 Kumar, Rohan 105 2.5 6.5 11.0 7.5 32.0 D72 W141 L59 L25 W127 70 Kennedy, Dash 340 2.5 6.5 10.5 8.5 29.5 W143 L81 D135 W48 L25 71 Ganesh, Saanjali 107 2.5 6.5 10.0 9.0 29.0 W150 D59 -N- W88 L20 72 Inamdar, Dhanya 2.5 6.5 10.0 7.0 31.5 D69 D119 D73 L64 W134 73 Doddi, Shuban 110 2.5 6.0 10.5 7.5 33.0 W139 L80 D72 L20 W129 74 Richardson, Reid 105 2.5 5.0 9.0 5.5 26.0 D112 L106 L88 W145 W125 75 Balasubramaniam, Pranav 107 2.5 4.5 7.0 6.5 22.5 -N- D129 W139 D89 D67 76 Schwartz, David 2.5 4.0 7.5 10.5 24.0 W123 W39 D24 -N- -N- 77 Echeverri, Nicolas 145 2.5 2.0 4.5 5.5 11.5 -N- -N- W152 W116 D61 78 MePani, Lucas 312 2.5 2.0 3.5 4.5 10.0 -N- -N- D137 W136 W114 79 Mador, Miles 107 2.0 12.0 16.0 9.0 45.5 W28 W91 L15 L37 L54 80 Venkatagiri, Varun 2.0 11.5 15.5 9.0 42.5 W117 W73 L21 L10 L56 81 Clark, Parrish 2.0 10.5 15.5 9.0 45.0 W130 W70 L3 L35 L40 82 Belinfante, Cole 107 2.0 10.5 15.0 9.0 38.5 W126 W105 L8 L17 L45 83 Desai, Ayanna 107 2.0 10.0 14.0 7.0 44.0 W92 L5 L38 W130 L41 84 Gurkas, Ada 2.0 10.0 14.0 6.5 36.5 W131 L8 L16 D114 D95 85 Edwards, Dash 2.0 10.0 14.0 5.0 33.5 L48 L16 W126 W103 L55 86 Alembik, Frannie 105 2.0 9.5 13.5 8.0 38.0 W137 L14 W91 L28 L52 87 Onians, Hudson 2.0 9.5 13.5 8.0 37.0 W152 L12 W95 L16 L39 88 Brown, Noah 2.0 9.5 13.0 6.0 35.0 D95 L27 W74 L71 D94 89 Byrd, Max 2.0 9.0 13.5 6.5 35.0 D119 L4 W140 D75 L50 90 Chebrolu, Srinidhi 105 2.0 9.0 13.0 8.0 36.0 D20 W153 D97 L42 L57 91 Orfila, Bianca 2.0 8.5 11.5 6.5 35.5 W46 L79 L86 D66 D93 92 Lohar, Aditya 2.0 8.5 11.5 6.5 31.5 L83 W102 D94 D52 L47 93 Flood, Kelsey 2.0 8.0 12.0 4.0 34.5 L15 L28 D136 W120 D91 94 Han, William 2.0 8.0 11.5 6.0 33.5 L32 W146 D92 L23 D88 95 Yajaman, Dhanvin Rajesh 188 2.0 8.0 11.5 5.0 34.0 D88 L20 L87 W149 D84 96 Riddell, Liam 2.0 8.0 11.0 7.0 35.5 W144 L19 L36 W119 L49 97 KuPPuswamy, Karthik 2.0 7.5 11.5 8.0 37.5 D138 W128 D90 L12 L48 98 George, Joel 2.0 7.5 11.5 7.0 37.5 L29 W143 W123 L13 L32 99 Terry, Coy 2.0 7.5 11.5 4.5 33.5 L9 -B- L18 D129 D106 100 Homansky, Benjamin 2.0 7.5 11.0 8.0 31.0 W102 L21 W105 L43 -N- 101 Mcconnie, Aiden 2.0 7.5 10.5 5.0 30.0 L37 W144 L46 L40 W139 102 MuPPiri, Sreenidhi 2.0 7.5 10.0 3.5 21.0 L100 L92 D154 D108 W155 103 Iyer, Pranav 2.0 7.0 10.5 6.0 31.0 W146 L24 L39 L85 W138 104 Tabor, Oleg 2.0 7.0 10.0 8.0 30.0 D64 W120 D42 L46 -N- 105 RudolPh, William 2.0 7.0 9.5 6.0 32.0 W125 L82 L100 L61 W141 106 PlemPer, Ingrid 2.0 6.5 11.0 7.0 25.0 D4 W74 -F- L131 D99 107 Vaughn, Jason 2.0 6.0 9.5 3.5 27.5 L18 L38 D127 D139 W144 108 Amichai, Daphna 2.0 5.5 8.0 4.0 19.5 -N- D66 L64 D102 W140 109 Mohammad, Ibrahim 2.0 3.5 6.5 8.0 24.0 D19 W138 D33 -N- -N- 110 Mahapatra, Samarth 2.0 3.0 6.5 5.0 14.5 -N- -N- W113 W121 L51 111 Rhee, James 103 2.0 1.0 6.0 6.0 19.0 -X- L3 -N- W134 -N- 112 Plog, Hayden 1.5 9.0 12.5 5.0 30.5 D74 D124 L43 L54 D117 113 Schmid, Sarah 1.5 8.5 12.5 2.0 28.0 L7 L53 L110 D155 W152 114 Gujral, Ravnoor 1.5 8.5 12.0 6.0 35.0 W129 L31 L67 D84 L78 115 Stribling, Foster 1.5 8.5 12.0 5.0 30.0 L23 D25 W145 L27 -N- 116 Crow, Rowan 1.5 8.0 11.5 4.0 25.0 L65 D150 D118 L77 D130 117 Riddell, Cameron 1.5 8.0 11.0 4.5 32.0 L80 W132 L68 L49 D112 118 Rubio-Luengo, Mateo 1.5 8.0 11.0 4.0 30.5 L60 D52 D116 L45 D123 119 Borg, Tanner 1.5 8.0 10.5 5.0 33.5 D89 D72 L47 L96 D124 120 Rehme, Daniel 1.5 7.5 11.0 3.5 31.5 D62 L104 L25 L93 W153 121 Rachamalla, Yash 1.5 7.5 10.5 3.5 22.0 L39 L149 W146 L110 D122 122 Baxter, Elizabeth 1.5 7.0 12.0 2.5 29.5 L2 L34 L148 W143 D121 123 Izkovich, May 1.5 7.0 11.0 3.5 27.5 L76 -X- L98 L57 D118 124 Anand, Vikram 1.5 7.0 10.5 5.0 29.0 D141 D112 L44 L53 D119 125 Scott, Olivia 1.5 7.0 10.0 5.0 27.0 L105 D140 W128 L34 L74 126 De Dios, Alexander 1.5 7.0 10.0 2.5 25.0 L82 L44 L85 W156 D131 127 Bryla, Katherine 1.5 6.5 10.0 3.5 29.5 L21 L134 D107 W137 L69 128 Burton, Howard 1.5 6.5 9.5 4.5 31.0 D42 L97 L125 W153 L66 129 Cook, Kai 1.5 6.5 9.5 4.5 28.5 L114 D75 D138 D99 L73 130 Sanghvi, Shaan 1.5 4.0 6.0 4.5 20.0 L81 W156 -N- L83 D116 131 Panuganti, SuPratik 1.5 3.5 6.0 2.5 16.0 L84 -F- -N- W106 D126 132 Long, Addison 103 1.5 2.5 4.5 2.0 9.5 -N- L117 L147 D152 W151 133 Balocki, Hutch 1.5 2.0 5.0 5.5 15.5 D145 L42 W153 -N- -N- 134 Weller, Ethan 1.0 10.0 14.5 4.0 35.5 L51 W127 L17 L111 L72 135 Stribling, Yancey 1.0 10.0 14.0 3.5 33.0 L10 D54 D70 L56 -N- 136 Burton, Knox 1.0 9.5 13.0 2.0 28.5 L49 L46 D93 L78 D145 137 Boyer, Will 1.0 8.0 12.0 2.0 26.5 L86 L26 D78 L127 D146 138 Rodriguez, Shanti 1.0 8.0 11.0 4.0 34.0 D97 L109 D129 L63 L103 139 Tsai, Nathalie 1.0 8.0 11.0 3.0 26.0 L73 D142 L75 D107 L101 140 Gruel, Holden 1.0 7.0 12.0 3.0 34.0 L3 D125 L89 D141 L108 141 Maselle, Wilson 1.0 7.0 10.0 3.5 28.5 D124 L69 L52 D140 L105 142 Freeman, Reese 1.0 6.5 10.0 3.5 26.0 L24 D139 D150 L50 -N- 143 Munamarty, Meghana 1.0 6.0 10.0 0.0 24.0 L70 L98 L57 L122 -B- 144 Penn, Wade 1.0 6.0 9.5 2.0 21.5 L96 L101 -B- L55 L107 145 Andrews, Idaraobong 1.0 5.5 8.0 3.0 18.0 D133 -N- L115 L74 D136 146 Fucile, Cj 1.0 5.0 7.0 1.5 18.5 L103 L94 L121 D151 D137 147 Fang, Andrew 1.0 4.5 7.5 3.0 21.0 L59 L30 W132 -N- -N- 148 Mbuvi, Musinga 1.0 4.0 6.5 3.0 16.5 -N- L61 W122 L65 -N- 149 Kshirsagar, Aashna 1.0 3.5 7.0 4.0 18.0 -N- W121 L28 L95 -N- 150 Hollahan, Oliver 1.0 3.0 6.0 3.5 16.5 L71 D116 D142 -N- -N- 151 Vangapandu, Saket Ram 0.5 10.0 14.5 1.0 30.5 L35 L17 L56 D146 L132 152 James, Aaliyah 0.5 8.0 11.5 1.0 25.5 L87 L68 L77 D132 L113 153 Muvva, Tanmaya 0.5 7.5 11.0 2.5 31.0 D27 L90 L133 L128 L120 154 Bates Iii, Louis 0.5 5.0 9.0 1.5 23.5 L14 L45 D102 -N- -N- 155 McCoy, Ethan 105 0.5 3.5 7.0 1.0 11.5 -N- -N- L55 D113 L102 156 Chapman, Mimi 102 0.0 6.0 9.0 0.0 21.5 L67 L130 L40 L126 -N- 157 Hardy, Lee 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -F- -U- -U- -U- -U- 158 Kurella, Madhu 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -F- -U- -U- -U- -U- 159 Seymus, Logan 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -F- -U- -N- -N- -U-.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thierry Moreau
    Compilation and Hardware Support for Approximate Acceleration Thierry Moreau, Adrian Sampson, Andre Baixo, Mark Wyse, Ben Ransford, Jacob Nelson, Hadi Esmaeilzadeh (Georgia Tech), Luis Ceze and Mark Oskin University of Washington [email protected] Theme: 2384.004 1 Thierry Moreau Approximate Computing Aims to exploit application resilience to trade-off quality for efficiency 2 Thierry Moreau Approximate Computing 3 Thierry Moreau Approximate Computing ✅ Accurate ✅ Approximate ❌ Expensive ✅ Cheap 4 Thierry Moreau 5 Thierry Moreau 6 Thierry Moreau 7 Thierry Moreau Neural Networks as Approximate Accelerators CPU Esmaeilzadeh et al. [MICRO 2012] 8 Thierry Moreau Neural Acceleration float foo (float a, float b) { AR F … NPUM P G return val; approximation acceleration } 9 Thierry Moreau Neural Acceleration compiler-support float foo (float a, float b) { AR F … NPUM P G return val; approximation acceleration } ACCEPT* *Sampson et. al [UW-TR] 10 Thierry Moreau Neural Acceleration compiler-support HW-support float foo (float a, float b) { AR F … NPUM P G return val; approximation acceleration } ACCEPT SNNAP* *Moreau et. al [HPCA2015] 11 Thierry Moreau Neural Acceleration compiler-support HW-support float foo (float a, float b) { AR F … NPUM P G return val; approximation acceleration } ACCEPT SNNAP 3.8x speedup and 2.8x efficiency - 10% error 12 Thierry Moreau Talk Outline Introduction Compiler Support with ACCEPT SNNAP Accelerator design Evaluation & Comparison with HLS 13 Thierry Moreau Compilation Overview code 1. Region detection annotation 14 Thierry Moreau Compilation Overview ACCEPT code region detection 1. Region detection & program annotation instrumentation 15 Thierry Moreau Compilation Overview ACCEPT code region detection 1. Region detection & program annotation instrumentation back prop.
    [Show full text]
  • Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592
    Technical Data Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592 Topic Page Description 2 Heater Element Selection Procedure 2 Index to Heater Element Selection Tables 5 Heater Element Selection Tables 6 Additional Resources These documents contain additional information concerning related products from Rockwell Automation. Resource Description Industrial Automation Wiring and Grounding Guidelines, publication 1770-4.1 Provides general guidelines for installing a Rockwell Automation industrial system. Product Certifications website, http://www.ab.com Provides declarations of conformity, certificates, and other certification details. You can view or download publications at http://www.rockwellautomation.com/literature/. To order paper copies of technical documentation, contact your local Allen-Bradley distributor or Rockwell Automation sales representative. For Application on Bulletin 100/500/609/1200 Line Starters Heater Element Specifications Eutectic Alloy Overload Relay Heater Elements Type J — CLASS 10 Type P — CLASS 20 (Bul. 600 ONLY) Type W — CLASS 20 Type WL — CLASS 30 Note: Heater Element Type W/WL does not currently meet the material Type W Heater Elements restrictions related to EU ROHS Description The following is for motors rated for Continuous Duty: For motors with marked service factor of not less than 1.15, or Overload Relay Class Designation motors with a marked temperature rise not over +40 °C United States Industry Standards (NEMA ICS 2 Part 4) designate an (+104 °F), apply application rules 1 through 3. Apply application overload relay by a class number indicating the maximum time in rules 2 and 3 when the temperature difference does not exceed seconds at which it will trip when carrying a current equal to 600 +10 °C (+18 °F).
    [Show full text]
  • K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts Tbrk1 Tbrk2 Tbrk3 Tbrk4
    K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts TBrk1 TBrk2 TBrk3 TBrk4 Rnd1 Rnd2 Rnd3 Rnd4 Rnd5 Rnd6 1 Chakraborty, Dipro 11 2299 5.5 21 24 43 20.5 W27 W12 W5 W32 W8 D3 State Champion, AZ Denker Representative 2 Yim, Tony Sung BASISS 8 2135 5 20.5 23.5 38.5 17.5 W24 W10 D3 D16 W11 W9 3 Aletheia-Zomlefer, Soren CHANPR 11 1961 5 20 23 35.5 18.5 W25 W26 D2 W40 W15 D1 4 Desmarais, Nicholas Eduard NOTRED 10 1917 5 18 20 33 18 W39 W23 W18 L15 W10 W8 5 Wong, Kinsleigh Phillip CFHS 10 1992 4.5 20 20 24.5 15 -X- W17 L1 W26 D7 W15 6 Todd, Bryce BASISC 10 1923 4.5 17 19 26.5 14.5 W38 D18 L9 W23 W21 W16 7 Chaliki, Kalyan DSMTHS 9 1726 4.5 17 18.5 26 15 W46 L16 W28 W22 D5 W17 8 Li, Bohan UHS 9 2048 4 22 25 29 18 W30 W11 W45 W9 L1 L4 9 Mittal, Rohan CFHS 9 1916 4 19.5 20.5 23 17 W47 W22 W6 L8 W20 L2 10 Pennock, Joshua CFHS 10 1682 4 19 22 24 14 W31 L2 W25 W21 L4 W29 11 Aradhyula, Sumhith CFHS 9 1631 4 18 20 22 14 W41 L8 W38 W13 L2 W19 12 Johnston, Nicolas Godfrey CFHS 9 1803 4 18 19.5 21 13 W43 L1 W29 L17 W24 W20 13 Martis, Tyler BRHS 12 1787 4 17 18 21 13 W42 L15 W24 L11 W18 W22 14 Plumb, Justin Rodney GCLACA 10 1700 4 16 17 20 13 W51 L32 W19 L20 W28 W27 15 Martinez, Isaac GLPREP 10 2159 3.5 21.5 24.5 27.5 16 W28 W13 D16 W4 L3 L5 16 Chen, Derek H CFHS 10 1965 3.5 21 23.5 26 15.5 W35 W7 D15 D2 D17 L6 17 Woodson, Tyler GILBHS 1640 3.5 19 19 17.5 14 W50 L5 W30 W12 D16 L7 18 Cancio, Aiya CFHS 9 1469 3.5 18.5 20 17.5 12.5 W36 D6 L4 W46 L13 W25 AZ Girls' Invitational Representative 19 Folden, Kurt CHANPR 10 1207 3 14 18 12 10 L32 W50 L14 W31 W23 L11 20 Thornton,
    [Show full text]
  • BU97530KVT MAX 445 Segment(89Segx5com)
    Datasheet LCD Segment Drivers Multi-function LCD Segment Drivers BU97530KVT MAX 445 Segment(89SEGx5COM) General Description Key Specifications The BU97530KVT is 1/5, 1/4, 1/3 duty or Static ■ Supply Voltage Range: +2.7V to +6.0V General-purpose LCD driver. The BU97530KVT can ■ Operating Temperature Range: -40°C to +85°C drive up to 445 LCD Segments directly. The ■ Max Segments: 445 Segments BU97530KVT can also control up to 9 General-purpose ■ Display Duty Static, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5 Selectable output pins / 9 PWM output pins. ■ Bias: 1/2, 1/3 Selectable These products also incorporate a key scan circuit that ■ Interface: 3wire Serial Interface accepts input from up to 30 keys to reduce printed circuit board wring. Features Package W (Typ) x D (Typ) x H (Max) Key Input Function for up to 30 Keys (A key scan is performed only when a key is pressed.) Either 1/5, 1/4, 1/3 Duty or Static Can be Selected with the Serial Control Data. 1/5 Duty Drive: Up to 445 Segments can be Driven 1/4 Duty Drive: Up to 360 Segments can be Driven 1/3 Duty Drive: Up to 270 Segments can be Driven Static Drive: Up to 90 Segments can be Driven Selectable Display Frame Frequency for Common and Segment Output Waveforms. Configurable Output Pin to Segment Output / PWM Output / General-purpose Output.(Max 9 Pins) Built-in OSC Circuit TQFP100V Integrated Voltage Detection Type Reset Circuit 16.00mm x 16.00mm x 1.20mm (VDET) No External Component Low Power Consumption Design Supports Line and Frame Inversion Applications Car Audio, Home Electrical Appliance, Meter Equipment etc.
    [Show full text]
  • BU91530KVT-M : Display Drivers
    Datasheet LCD Segment Drivers Multi-function LCD Segment Drivers BU91530KVT-M MAX 445 Segment(89SEGx5COM) General Description Key Specifications The BU91530KVT-M is 1/5, 1/4, 1/3 or 1/1 duty ■ Supply Voltage Range: +2.7V to +6.0V general-purpose LCD driver that can be used for ■ Operating Temperature Range: -40°C to +85°C frequency display in electronic tuners under the control of ■ Max Segments: 445 Segments a microcontroller. The BU91530KVT-M can drive up to ■ Display Duty 1/1, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5 Selectable 445 LCD Segments directly. The BU91530KVT-M can ■ Bias: 1/2, 1/3 Selectable also control up to 9 general-purpose output ports. ■ Interface: 3wire Serial Interface These products also incorporate a key scan circuit that accepts input from up to 30 keys to reduce printed circuit board wring. Package W (Typ.) x D (Typ.) x H (Max.) Features AEC-Q100 Qualified (Note1) Key input function for up to 30 keys (A key scan is performed only when a key is pressed.) Either 1/5, 1/4, 1/3 or 1/1 duty (static) can be selected with the serial control data. 1/5 duty drive: Up to 445 segments can be driven 1/4 duty drive: Up to 360 segments can be driven 1/3 duty drive: Up to 270 segments can be driven 1/1 duty drive: Up to 90 segments can be driven Serial Data Control of frame frequency for common and segment output waveforms. Serial data control of switching between the segment TQFP100V output port , PWM output port and general-purpose 16.00mm x 16.00mm x 1.20mm output port functions.(Max 9 ports) Built-in OSC circuit Integrated Power-on Reset Circuit No external component Low power consumption design Supports Line and Frame Inversion (Note1) Grade 3 Applications Car Audio, Home Electrical Appliance, Meter Equipment etc.
    [Show full text]
  • NEMA Motor Control
    Bulletin Eutectic Alloy Overload Relays Heater Elements Selection For Application on Bulletin 100/500/609/1200 Line Starters Eutectic Alloy Overload Relay Heater Elements Heater Element Selection Type J — CLASS 10 Table of Contents 0 Type P — CLASS 20 (Bul. 600 ONLY) Type W — CLASS 20 Overload Relay Type WL — CLASS 30 Class Designation...... this page Heater Element Selection ....................... this page 1 Type W Heater Elements Ambient Temperature Correction..................... this page Time — Current Characteristics............ 1-169 2 Index to Heater Element Selection Tables ............................. 1-170 3 Description The following is for motors rated for Continuous Duty: For motors with marked service factor of not less than 1.15, or Overload Relay Class Designation motors with a marked temperature rise not over +40 °C United States Industry Standards (NEMA ICS 2 Part 4) designate an (+104 °F), apply application rules 1 through 3. Apply application 4 overload relay by a class number indicating the maximum time in rules 2 and 3 when the temperature difference does not exceed seconds at which it will trip when carrying a current equal to 600 +10 °C (+18 °F). When the temperature difference is greater, see percent of its current rating. below. A Class 10 overload relay will trip in 10 seconds or less at a current 1. The Same Temperature at the Controller and the Motor — equal to 600 percent of its rating. Select the “Heater Type Number” with the listed “Full Load 5 Amperes” nearest the full load value shown on the motor A Class 20 overload relay will trip in 20 seconds or less at a current nameplate.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons Databook, Volume I 3 Stockpile
    3 Stockpile Chapter Three USNuclear Stockpile This section describes the 24 types of warheads cur- enriched uranium (oralloy) as its nuclear fissile material rently in the U.S. nuclear stockpile. As of 1983, the total and is considered volatile and unsafe. As a result, its number of warheads was an estimated 26,000. They are nuclear materials and fuzes are kept separately from the made in a wide variety of configurations with over 50 artillery projectile. The W33 can be used in two differ- different modifications and yields. The smallest war- ent yield configurations and requires the assembly and head is the man-portable nuclear land mine, known as insertion of distinct "pits" (nuclear materials cores) with the "Special Atomic Demolition Munition" (SADM). the amount of materials determining a "low" or '4high'' The SADM weighs only 58.5 pounds and has an explo- yield. sive yield (W54) equivalent to as little as 10 tons of TNT, In contrast, the newest of the nuclear warheads is the The largest yield is found in the 165 ton TITAN I1 mis- W80,5 a thermonuclear warhead built for the long-range sile, which carries a four ton nuclear warhead (W53) Air-Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM) and first deployed equal in explosive capability to 9 million tons of TNT, in late 1981. The W80 warhead has a yield equivalent to The nuclear weapons stockpile officially includes 200 kilotons of TNT (more than 20 times greater than the only those nuclear missile reentry vehicles, bombs, artil- W33), weighs about the same as the W33, utilizes the lery projectiles, and atomic demolition munitions that same material (oralloy), and, through improvements in are in "active service."l Active service means those electronics such as fuzing and miniaturization, repre- which are in the custody of the Department of Defense sents close to the limits of technology in building a high and considered "war reserve weapons." Excluded are yield, safe, small warhead.
    [Show full text]
  • Waukesha W68 & W88 Series
    INSTRUCTION MANUAL W68 and W88 Series THROTTLING/PRESSURE CONTROL VALVES FORM NO.: 95-03043 REVISION: 02/2013 READ AND UNDERSTAND THIS MANUAL PRIOR TO OPERATING OR SERVICING THIS PRODUCT. SPX Flow Technology 611 Sugar Creek Road Delavan, WI 53115 USA Tel: (800) 252-5200 or (262) 728-1900 Fax: (800) 252-5012 or (262) 728-4904 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.spxft.com Information contained in this manual is subject to change Copyright © 2013 SPX Corporation. without notice and does not represent a commitment on the All Rights Reserved. part of SPX Corporation. No part of this manual may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, Never-Seez is a registered trademark of Bostik Findley. electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and Dow Corning is a registered trademark of Dow Corning Corporation. recording, for any purpose, without the express written per- Loctite is a registered trademark of Henkel Loctite Corporation, U.S.A. mission of SPX Corporation. Revision Date: 02/2013 Publication: 95-03043 Table of Contents Waukesha Cherry-Burrell Warranty ................................................................................................................... 6 Shipping Damage or Loss ........................................................................................................6 Warranty Claim ........................................................................................................................6 Safety .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • High School Championship -- Standings
    2017 TCA South Texas State Scholastic Championships: High School Championship -- Standings # Place Name ID Rtng Post Team Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[M] TBrk[M] TBrk[S] TBrk[R] TBrk[C] 1 1 Priya Niki Trakru 13806686 2013 2033 STSTMAW63 W53 W18 W25 W12 W2 W6 7.0 30.5 24.5 34.5 34 28 2 2-5 Camille Y Kao 14297024 1969 1968 W85 W82 W32 W20 W11 L1 W15 6.0 29 22 32 25.5 26 3 Polo Stein 14275794 1709 1726 SBSBHSW69 W58 D10 W14 W27 D6 W16 6.0 28 22.5 31.5 27.25 24.5 4 Genta Kaieda 14354622 1888 1877 SHSHS W52 W41 L39 W43 W25 W22 W17 6.0 26.5 21.5 30.5 26.5 23 5 Fabian Olivares 13958918 1614 1656 SBSBHSW78 W16 W54 L39 W41 W11 W13 6.0 26.5 21.5 30 26.5 24 6 6-9 Jonathan Huerta 14086076 1748 1757 BRHHECHSW87 W111 W49 W26 W39 D3 L1 5.5 28.5 21.5 30.5 21 26 7 Satya G Holla 14354691 1698 1704 STSATSW72 W91 W33 L11 W26 W20 D8 5.5 27.5 22 30.5 23.25 23.5 8 Ritik Verma 13745958 1927 1903 CCVETERAW126 L44 W73 W30 W10 W36 D7 5.5 27 21.5 28.5 22.25 21.5 9 Jesus Guillen Jr 13762512 1791 1766 BRHHECHSW73 W108 L26 W111 D31 W40 W29 5.5 23.5 19 25.5 19.25 21.5 10 10-24 Nicholas Galindo 14494914 1390 1530 BRPORTERW99 W67 D3 W29 L8 W31 D12 5.0 29 23 32 21 22 11 Glen Ernest Rocha 16122046 1459 1543 HREARLYW65 W56 W84 W7 L2 L5 W44 5.0 29 23 32 20 23 12 Jorge Hernandez 14281624 1611 1617 SHSHS W51 W68 W44 W40 L1 D19 D10 5.0 29 22 32.5 20.5 23.5 13 Michael D Thomas 14793323 1783 1750 SBVMA W75 L43 W87 W42 W32 W28 L5 5.0 26.5 20.5 29.5 19.5 21 14 Jose Castillo Jr 14085711 1493 1504 BRHHECHSD103 W64 W35 L3 D30 W43 W40 5.0 26.5 20.5 29 19.5 19 15 Luis Ferna
    [Show full text]
  • How Much Warhead Reliability Is Enough for a Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty?
    How Much Warhead Reliability Is Enough for a Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty? David Hafemeister I. Introduction The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) selected the winning design from the two nuclear weapons laboratories for the reliable replacement warhead (RRW) on March 2, 2007. The winning design by the Lawrence–Livermore National Laboratory was the more cautious design, and had been tested previously. The Los Alamos design was more creative, but had not been nuclear tested. With the Cold War over, NNSA is planning to make warheads that are less constrained in weight and, in principle, more reliable. The Congress and the Executive Branch have agreed that RRW will not be tested before it enters the stockpile. Of course, this does not guarantee that the decision not to test could not be reversed in the future. The JASON group will comment on the RRW designs during the next year and the American Association for the Advancement of Science will release its report on the RRW in March 2007. Our discussion is intended as background material to help understand the RRW decisions and reports. On March 6, a session at the Denver APS meeting considered the RRW and nuclear missions. Talks were given by John Harvey (Director of NNSA Policy and Planning), Lt. General C. Robert Kehler (Deputy Commander of STRATCOM), Bruce Tarter (Chair of the AAAS–RRW Study), Sidney Drell (Stanford), Ivan Oelrich (Federation of American Scientists). The need for the RRW has been called into doubt by the 2006 JASON report that concluded the following: [1] “Most primary types have credible minimum lifetimes in excess of 100 years as regards aging of plutonium; those with assessed minimum lifetime of 100 years or less have clear mitigation paths that are proposed and/or being implemented...There is no evidence for void swelling in naturally –Pu samples over the actual and acceleratedδaged or artificially aged times scales examined to date, and good reason to believe it will not occur on times scales of interest, if at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Us - USSR Strategic Offensive Nuclear Forces 1946 - 1989
    us - USSR Strategic Offensive Nuclear Forces 1946 - 1989 Robert Standish Norris and Thomas B. Cochran Natural Resources Defense Council 1350 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 2000S 202-783-7800 Introduction Sources of Information Definitions Sources Table. 1: U.S. Strategic Offensive Forces, 1946-1989 Table 2: USSR Strategic Offensive Forces, 1956-1989 Table 3: U.S. ICBM Forces, 1959-1989 Table 4: USSR ICBM Forces, 1960-1989 Table 5: U.S. Ballistic Missile Submarine Forces, 1960-1989 Table 6: USSR Ballistic Missile Submarine Forces, 1958-1989 Table 7: U.S. Strategic Bomber Forces, 1946-1989 Table 8: USSR Strategic Bomber Forces, 1956-1989 Figure 1: U.S.- USSR Strategic Offensive Warheads, 1946-1989 Figure 2: U.S.- USSR ICBM Launchers, 1959-1989 Figure 3: U.S.- USSR ICBM WarheadsIRVs, 1959-1989 Figure 4: U.S.- USSR SLBM Launchers, 1958-1989 Figure 5: U.S.- USSR SLBM WarheadsIRVs, 1958-1989 Figure 6: U.S.- USSR Strategic Bombers, 1946-1989 Figure 7: U.S.- USSR Str~tegic Bomber Weapons, 1946-1989 About the Authors The NRDC Nuclear Weapons Data Center Recent Publications . Introduction A regular element of the debate about nuclear weapons and arms control is the presentation of data on the relative levels of US and USSR strategic forces, often in the form of tables or charts. Frequently, the data presented is unclear in terms of where it came from or what assumptions were used to construct it. Some tables present current "total" forces, others "on-line" forces, "alert" forces, "generated alert" forces, or "SALT accountable" forces. Each is important and more usable if detail about the sources and assumptions is provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Spec Sheet
    THE SATURDAY UP-SLOPE ARM WITH LARGE FRONT RAIL • 2” LEGS 52520 52535 52530 52580 108lbs. LOVESEAT 115lbs. APARTMENT SOFA 140lbs. 86" SOFA 170lbs. 96" SOFA TOTAL W59" D37" H32" TOTAL W76" D37" H32" TOTAL W86" D37" H32" TOTAL W96" D37" H32" SEAT W53" D22" H18" SEAT W68" D22" H18" SEAT W78" D22" H18" SEAT W88" D22" H18" ARMS --- --- H24" ARMS --- --- H24" ARMS --- --- H24" ARMS --- --- H24" SATURDAY UP-SLOPE ARM ALSO AVAILABLE WITH THIN FRONT RAIL AND 7" LEGS AS 575 GROUP. SEE 1:1 BOOKLET FOR MORE INFORMATION. SEE REVERSE FOR SECTIONAL OPTIONS. EST. 1989 // AUTHENTIC HAND BUILT FURNITURE // THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 50009 52511 52512 50013 80lbs. CORNER CHAIR 80lbs. RIGHT ARM CHAIR 80lbs. LEFT ARM CHAIR 80lbs. ARMLESS CHAIR TOTAL W37" D37" H32" TOTAL W30" D37" H32" TOTAL W30" D37" H32" TOTAL W26" D37" H32" SEAT W22" D22" H18" SEAT W26" D22" H18" SEAT W26" D22" H18" SEAT W26" D22" H18" ARMS --- --- --- ARMS --- --- H24" ARMS --- --- H24" ARMS --- --- --- 52521 52522 50023 52531 108lbs. R. ARM LOVESEAT 108lbs. L. ARM LOVESEAT 95lbs. ARMLESS LOVESEAT 180lbs. R. CORNER SOFA TOTAL W56" D37" H32" TOTAL W56" D37" H32" TOTAL W52" D37" H32" TOTAL W92" D37" H32" SEAT W53" D22" H18" SEAT W53" D22" H18" SEAT W52" D22" H18" SEAT W79" D22" H18" ARMS --- --- H24" ARMS --- --- H24" ARMS --- --- --- ARMS --- --- H24" 52532 50033 52533 52534 180lbs. L. CORNER SOFA 120lbs. ARMLESS SOFA 125lbs. R. ARM SOFA 125lbs. L. ARM SOFA TOTAL W92" D37" H32" TOTAL W78" D37" H32" TOTAL W82" D37" H32" TOTAL W82" D37" H32" SEAT W79" D22" H18" SEAT W78" D22" H18" SEAT W78" D22" H18" SEAT W78" D22" H18" ARMS --- --- H24" ARMS --- --- --- ARMS --- --- H24" ARMS --- --- H24" 50035 52536 52537 50039 100lbs.
    [Show full text]