Anglo-Saxon-Resource-Sheet
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Saxon Newsletter-Template.Indd
Saxon Newsletter of the Sutton Hoo Society No. 50 / January 2010 (© Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery) Hoards of Gold! The recovery of hundreds of 7th–8th century objects from a field in Staffordshire filled the newspapers when it was announced by the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) at a press conference on 24 September. Uncannily, the first piece of gold was recovered seventy years to the day after the first gold artefact was uncovered at Sutton Hoo on 21 July 1939.‘The old gods are speaking again,’ said Dr Kevin Leahy. Dr Leahy, who is national finds advisor on early medieval metalwork to the PAS and who catalogued the hoard, will be speaking to the SHS on 29 May (details, back page). Current Archaeology took the hoard to mark the who hate thee be driven from thy face’. (So even launch of their ‘new look’ when they ran ten pages this had a military flavour). of pictures in their November issue [CA 236] — “The art is like Sutton Hoo — gold with clois- which, incidentally, includes a two-page interview onée garnet and fabulous ‘Style 2’ animal interlace with our research director, Professor Martin on pommels and cheek guards — but maybe a Carver. bit later in date. This and the inscription suggest Martin tells us, “The hoard consists of 1,344 an early 8th century date overall — but this will items mainly of gold and silver, although 864 of probably move about. More than six hundred pho- these weigh less than 3g. The recognisable parts of tos of the objects can be seen on the PAS’s Flickr the hoard are dominated by military equipment — website. -
Heritage Trail Heritage Trail This Self-Guided Walking Tour Offers the Ch
Alrewas A38 Welcome to Tamworth The Staffordshire Hoard A513 Overseal and Tamworth, the Ancient Fradley M Capital of Mercia. A51 A515 A513 No Man’s Heath A38 Fazeley 11 It’s not very often that you get the chance to get close to Lichfield real, valuable buried treasure and look back in time to the Heritage A51 A513 6th century, when Tamworth was the Ancient Capital of A5 Mercia, one of the three kingdoms that ruled the county. T5 A5 M42 M6 Toll T4 The Anglo-Saxons came to Staffordshire in the late 6th Tamworth century as groups of settlers or tribes. Mercia means Trail boundary and the area grew from a number of these A5 Polesworth A453 Fazeley separate tribes. A454 10 A51 A5 The Mercians gradually conquered most of the other A446 M42 Midland tribes to become a powerful kingdom stretching Sutton A4091 Atherstone Coldfield M6 Toll from the Humber to the Thames. The rest of the country T3 A452 was ruled by the kingdoms of Northumbria and Wessex. Kingsbury T2 9 Birmingham Lea Marston N Tamworth was the heartland of the Mercian Kingdom and M6 T1 the King’s main residence was in Tamworth. It is certain A38 M42 that the Mercian kings spent more time at Tamworth than 6 5 4a 8 anywhere else, and it is thought that there was a royal palace at Tamworth by the end of the 7th century Route Description situated on the site close to St Editha’s Church. By road: From M42 take A5 Westbound, from A38 take A5 Eastbound, and follow signs for Tamworth. -
Wessex and the Reign of Edmund Ii Ironside
Chapter 16 Wessex and the Reign of Edmund ii Ironside David McDermott Edmund Ironside, the eldest surviving son of Æthelred ii (‘the Unready’), is an often overlooked political figure. This results primarily from the brevity of his reign, which lasted approximately seven months, from 23 April to 30 November 1016. It could also be said that Edmund’s legacy compares unfavourably with those of his forebears. Unlike other Anglo-Saxon Kings of England whose lon- ger reigns and periods of uninterrupted peace gave them opportunities to leg- islate, renovate the currency or reform the Church, Edmund’s brief rule was dominated by the need to quell initial domestic opposition to his rule, and prevent a determined foreign adversary seizing the throne. Edmund conduct- ed his kingship under demanding circumstances and for his resolute, indefati- gable and mostly successful resistance to Cnut, his career deserves to be dis- cussed and his successes acknowledged. Before discussing the importance of Wessex for Edmund Ironside, it is con- structive, at this stage, to clarify what is meant by ‘Wessex’. It is also fitting to use the definition of the region provided by Barbara Yorke. The core shires of Wessex may be reliably regarded as Devon, Somerset, Dorset, Wiltshire, Berk- shire and Hampshire (including the Isle of Wight).1 Following the victory of the West Saxon King Ecgbert at the battle of Ellendun (Wroughton, Wilts.) in 835, the borders of Wessex expanded, with the counties of Kent, Sussex, Surrey and Essex passing from Mercian to West Saxon control.2 Wessex was not the only region with which Edmund was associated, and nor was he the only king from the royal House of Wessex with connections to other regions. -
Anglo-Saxons
Anglo-Saxons Britain looked very different when the Anglo-Saxons came to our shores over 1600 years ago! Much of the country was covered in oak forests and many of the population lived in the countryside where they made a living from farming. Use the links below to find out more about this era in Britain’s history. Who were the Anglo-Saxons? Why and when did they come to Britain? https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/topics/zxsbcdm/arti cles/zq2m6sg https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/topics/zxsbcdm/a rticles/z23br82 http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/interactive/timelines/l anguage_timeline/index_embed.shtml Use this link to look at some of the different groups / tribes who were https://www.natgeokids.com/uk/discover/history/gen eral-history/anglo-saxons/ fighting and living in Britain during the AD 400s and why they came to Britain. The Anglo-Saxons were a mix of tribes from areas of Europe that settled in Where did Anglo-Saxons live? What Britain from around AD 410 to 1066. were their settlements like? http://www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/saxons/se ttle.htm What did Anglo-Saxon life look like? Who was in charge? https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/clips/znjqxnb https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/topics/zxsbcdm/arti We have set you some activities on cles/zqrc9j6 Purple Mash which may also help you Use the interactive image to find out build a picture in your head about about the different roles people had in what Anglo-Saxon Britain looked like. Anglo-Saxon society including the king, thegn (sometimes spelt ‘thane’), ceorl Sutton Hoo Burial Artefacts (pronounced ‘churl’) and slaves. -
Hunting and Social Change in Late Saxon England
Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 2016 Butchered Bones, Carved Stones: Hunting and Social Change in Late Saxon England Shawn Hale Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in History at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Hale, Shawn, "Butchered Bones, Carved Stones: Hunting and Social Change in Late Saxon England" (2016). Masters Theses. 2418. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2418 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Graduate School� EASTERNILLINOIS UNIVERSITY " Thesis Maintenance and Reproduction Certificate FOR: Graduate Candidates Completing Theses in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree Graduate Faculty Advisors Directing the Theses RE: Preservation, Reproduction, and Distribution of Thesis Research Preserving, reproducing, and distributing thesis research is an important part of Booth Library's responsibility to provide access to scholarship. In order to further this goal, Booth Library makes all graduate theses completed as part of a degree program at Eastern Illinois University available for personal study, research, and other not-for-profit educational purposes. Under 17 U.S.C. § 108, the library may reproduce and distribute a copy without infringing on copyright; however, professional courtesy dictates that permission be requested from the author before doing so. Your signatures affirm the following: • The graduate candidate is the author of this thesis. • The graduate candidate retains the copyright and intellectual property rights associated with the original research, creative activity, and intellectual or artistic content of the thesis. -
Anglo Saxon and Norman England Booklet— 1.1 Anglo-Saxon Society Anglo-Saxon Society 1.1
Anglo Saxon and Norman England Booklet— 1.1 Anglo-Saxon Society Anglo-Saxon Society 1.1 Social System: Peasant Farmers Majority of Anglo-Saxons were peasant farmers. Peasants did a set amount of work for the local lord as well as work- ing the land to support themselves and their family. If they did not work for the lord the lord could take away their land. ‘Ceorls’ peasants were free to go work for another lord if they wanted to. Slaves 10% of Anglo-Saxons were slaves. Slaves could be bought and sold, and treated more like property than people. The Normans thought that owning slaves was barbaric, but it was a normal part of Anglo-Saxon life. Thegns Thegns were local lords, there were between 4,000 and 5000 Thegns. Thegns was an important man in the local community and lived in a manor house with a separate church. Task Colour in the pie chart to represent the so- cial structure of Anglo-Saxon England. Earls Earls were the most important men after the king. The relation- ship between the king and his earls was based on loyalty. The king trusted the earl more he would give him greater re- wards. However, sometimes the earls challenged the king to get more power. The Power of the English Monarchy The king’s role was to protect his people from attack and give them laws to maintain safety and security at home. In return, the people of England owed him service. Every boy swore an oath when he reached the age of 12 to be faithful to the king. -
Old English Ecologies: Environmental Readings of Anglo-Saxon Texts and Culture
Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 12-2013 Old English Ecologies: Environmental Readings of Anglo-Saxon Texts and Culture Ilse Schweitzer VanDonkelaar Western Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons, and the Medieval Studies Commons Recommended Citation VanDonkelaar, Ilse Schweitzer, "Old English Ecologies: Environmental Readings of Anglo-Saxon Texts and Culture" (2013). Dissertations. 216. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/216 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OLD ENGLISH ECOLOGIES: ENVIRONMENTAL READINGS OF ANGLO-SAXON TEXTS AND CULTURE by Ilse Schweitzer VanDonkelaar A dissertation submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English Western Michigan University December 2013 Doctoral Committee: Jana K. Schulman, Ph.D., Chair Eve Salisbury, Ph.D. Richard Utz, Ph.D. Sarah Hill, Ph.D. OLD ENGLISH ECOLOGIES: ENVIRONMENTAL READINGS OF ANGLO-SAXON TEXTS AND CULTURE Ilse Schweitzer VanDonkelaar, Ph.D. Western Michigan University, 2013 Conventionally, scholars have viewed representations of the natural world in Anglo-Saxon (Old English) literature as peripheral, static, or largely symbolic: a “backdrop” before which the events of human and divine history unfold. In “Old English Ecologies,” I apply the relatively new critical perspectives of ecocriticism and place- based study to the Anglo-Saxon canon to reveal the depth and changeability in these literary landscapes. -
The Relationship Between King Alfred the Great and Ceolwulf II of Mercia (874-C.879)
Penn History Review Volume 26 Issue 2 Article 2 February 2020 The Relationship between King Alfred the Great and Ceolwulf II of Mercia (874-c.879) Brent Weisberg University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/phr Recommended Citation Weisberg, Brent (2020) "The Relationship between King Alfred the Great and Ceolwulf II of Mercia (874-c.879)," Penn History Review: Vol. 26 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/phr/vol26/iss2/2 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/phr/vol26/iss2/2 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Alfred the Great and Ceolwulf II The Relationship between King Alfred the Great and Ceolwulf II of Mercia (874-c.879) Brent Weisberg, University of Pennsylvania Introduction Studying King Ceolwulf II of Mercia presents one with a situation not unlike the one former US Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld’s described concerning American intelligence work in Iraq in 2002: "there are known knowns… there are known unknowns… but there are also unknown unknowns."1 The "known knowns" of Ceolwulf’s reign are few and far between. All we have to bear witness to the life and legacy of Ceolwulf, the last independent ruler of Mercia, are two charters of his, a few mentions in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle as well as two of its likely derivatives, and several dozen coins.2 The few coins we have, particularly examples of Two Emperors type coins from the recent Watlington hoard find, provide material evidence of Ceolwulf’s reign that may be used to corroborate or contravene literary evidence.3 I shall seek to elucidate the history of Ceolwulf that I discern to be most plausible through the lens of his relationships with King Alfred of Wessex and the Vikings. -
Anglo – Saxon Society
ABSTRACT This booklet will enable you to revise the key aspects of Paper 2 Anglo – Saxon England, some of which you may remember from year 9. After you have completed this booklet, there will be some more to revise Anglo – Saxon England before we move onto Norman England from 1066. Ms Marsh ANGLO – SAXON SOCIETY GCSE History Paper 2 How did Anglo – Saxon kings demonstrate their power? L.O: Explain key features of Anglo – Saxon kings 1. Which last Anglo – Saxon king ruled between 1042 - 1066? 2. Which people were the biggest threat to the Anglo – Saxons? 3. Who was at the top of Anglo – Saxon society? (Answers at the end of the booklet) Recap! The social hierarchy of Anglo – Saxon England meant that there were clear roles for everyone in society. The hierarchy was based on servitude – this meant that everyone had to do some sort of role to support the country. The king was the ultimate source of authority. This meant that all his decisions were final, partly due to the belief that God had chosen the king so any challenge to the king would be seen as a challenge to God. We call this belief anointed by God. Even though there were earldoms that were extremely powerful (see map below), most earls relied on the king to grant them their power and then maintain this power. Ultimately, the king could reduce the power of his earls or completely remove them. Edward the Confessor tried to do this in 1051, when he felt Earl Godwin had become too powerful – even though it ultimately failed, as Earl Godwin was allowed to regain his earldom, it demonstrates to us the huge power of the king. -
Staffordshire Anglo-Saxon Hoard
Contextualising Metal-Detected Discoveries: Staffordshire Anglo-Saxon Hoard (Project 5892) Revised Project Design Version 3 Submitted 18th July 2013 H.E.M. Cool Barbican Research Associates (Company no. 3929951; VAT registration 747960390) Document Control Grid Title: Contextualising Metal-Detected Discoveries: Staffordshire Anglo-Saxon Hoard Author: H.E.M. Cool. Start Date: 18th July, 2013 Contributors: Team members as per section 15 and Programme Co-ordinator. History: Developed from Draft second revision Project Design (June 2013), to incorporate the extended work on the materials analysis (Variation 3). Version number: 6 Status: Final Summary of changes: See Preface April 2013, June 2013 and July 2013 following the preliminaries. Circulation: English Heritage, HMG and Programme Co-ordinator Required Action: none File name: Staffordshire/Admin/Revised PD July 2013 Approval: H.E.M. Cool on behalf of Barbican Research Associates Ltd. 18: 06:2013 Contact details: 16 Lady Bay Road, West Bridgford NOTTINGHAM NG2 5BJ Tel: 0115 9819 065 Mobile: 00 44 7980 898962 [email protected] Contents Preface iv Preface April 2013 v Preface June 2013 v Preface July 2013 vi 1 Project Name 1 2 Summary Description 1 3 Background 3.1 Introduction 1 3.2 Organisation of this document 3 4 Assessment 4.1 Introduction 3 4.2 The Assessment tasks 6 4.3 Checking the records 7 4.4 Database and secure website planning 8 4.5 Aerial photography and fieldwork assessment 10 4.6 Background information on the area 14 5 The Hoard 5.1 Introduction 15 5.2 The contents -
The Anglo-Saxon and Norman "Eigenkirche" and the Ecclesiastical Policy of William I
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1981 The Anglo-Saxon and Norman "Eigenkirche" and the Ecclesiastical Policy of William I. Albert Simeon Cote Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Cote, Albert Simeon Jr, "The Anglo-Saxon and Norman "Eigenkirche" and the Ecclesiastical Policy of William I." (1981). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3675. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3675 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “ Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. -
Comprehensive Exam Bibliography 11.24.12 Early Anglo-Saxon Art
Comprehensive Exam Bibliography 11.24.12 Early Anglo‐Saxon Art History C. Twomey STAFFORDSHIRE HOARD 2012 COLLOQUIUM ARTICLES Behr, Charlotte. “The Symbolic Nature of Gold in Magical and Religious Contexts.” Brooks, Nicholas “The Staffordshire Hoard the Mercian Royal Court” Brown, Michelle P. “The Manuscript Context for the Inscription” Henderson, George and Isabel Henderson. “The Implications of the Staffordshire Hoard for the understanding of the origins and development of the Insular art style as it appears in manuscripts and sculpture.” Hooke, Della, “The Landscape of the Stafforshire Hoard.” Keynes, Simon. “The Staffordshire Hoard and Mercian Power” Leahy, Kevin. “The Contents of the Hoard” Okasha, Elizabeth, “The Staffordshire Hoard inscription” (Revised version, Oct 2011). Nielsen, Karen Høilund. “Style II and all that: The potential of the hoard for statistical study of chronology and geographical distributions” Parsons, David, “The name ‘Hammerwich.’” ADDITIONAL STAFFORDSHIRE HOARD MATERIALS Carver, M. 2011.’The best we can do?’, Antiquity 85, 230‐34. http://antiquity.ac.uk/ant/085/ant0850230.htm Dean, Stephen, Della Hooke and Alex Jones, “The ‘Staffordshire Hoard’: The Fieldwork,” The Antiquaries Journal 90 (2010): 139‐52. Webster, L., Sparey‐Green, C., Périn, P. and Hills, C. 2011 ‘The Staffordshire (Ogley Hay) Hoard: problems of interpretation’, Antiquity 85, 221‐9 http://antiquity.ac.uk/ant/085/ant0850221.htm. ARTICLES: Bruce‐Mitford, Rupert. “Ireland and the Hanging Bowls,” Ireland and Insular Art AD 500‐1200: Proceedings of a Conference at University College Cork 31 Oct‐3 Nov 1985 (Dublin: Royal Irish Academy, 1987): 30‐9. Stephen T Driscoll, Jane Geddes, and Mark A Hall, eds., Pictish Progress: New Studies on Northern Britain in the Middle Ages (Leiden, 2011).