Read Book Media Ethics at Work 2Nd Edition
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
MEDIA ETHICS AT WORK 2ND EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Lee Anne Peck | --- | --- | --- | 9781506315287 | --- | --- Raymond R. Wong Endowed Professor in Media Ethics job with HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY | Negligence and lawyers 9. Litigation Alternative dispute resolution Third parties Business ethics Lawyers' social responsibilities Gender, race, and diversity in the legal profession Applying legal theories. He is a widely published author across several disciplines, including criminal law, family law, and legal ethics. Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Academic Skip to main content. Search Start Search. Choose your country or region Close. Dear Customer, As a global organization, we, like many others, recognize the significant threat posed by the coronavirus. Student Price: Contact us to learn more. Explains the basic tenants of the profession, provides some historical context and details on how it is being practiced today for prospective journalists. This introduction to journalism explains the basic tenets of the profession, provides some historical context and uses primarily recent examples to inform prospective journalists and those who simply want to become better informed. As a professional journalist, I approached this project as I do my other work, starting with research and then synthesizing the information into this online textbook. It is intended to be an interactive guide to engage students and not a comprehensive history of the profession, which is why there are lists of suggested readings on themes found in the chapters. Though the material focuses mainly on journalism in the United States, I examine how it is practiced in other countries and share information about restrictions and challenges journalists face around the world. Most discussion questions are given for participation points only, to encourage students to think critically about a particular issue they may have never considered, or give them an opportunity to try something new without penalty. This Site contains links to pages on other websites. We have not reviewed, and cannot review, all of the material, including computer software, made available through the websites to which the Site links, and that link to the Site. The author does not have any control over those third-party websites and webpages, and is not responsible for their contents or their use. There may be content you find offensive. By linking to a third-party website or webpage, the author does not represent or imply that it endorses such website or webpage. You are responsible for taking precautions as necessary to protect yourself and your computer systems from viruses, worms, Trojan horses, and other harmful or destructive content. None of the content on this site should be construed as legal advice. Users should contact an attorney in their jurisdiction for legal advice applicable to their particular situation. Skip to main content back to top hat. Over the years, she has advised three student newspapers. Daily Dispatch. In the mids, she edited and wrote for publications in Indiana and Delaware; she has worked for the Fort Collins Coloradoan as an editor, a columnist and writing coach and for the Rocky Mountain News as a copy editor. Guy Reel, Ph. He received his Ph. Account Options Anmelden. Media Ethics at Work: True Stories from Young Professionals - Google Books We suggest using the following learning objectives or component behaviors in connection with the learning activities in this toolkit: Make ethical decisions with social and digital media by applying the standards of the NASW Code of Ethics and other relevant guidelines, laws and policies; Use self-reflection and self-regulation to maintain and demonstrate professionalism with social media. Describe how to use social media ethically and professionally to facilitate practice outcomes. Demonstrate professional demeanor with social media. Use supervision and consultation to guide professional judgement and behavior with social media. Submit a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Search for:. Follow Me on Twitter! Follow LaurelHitchcock. Signup today to be notified of new updates! Confidentiality 6. Conflicts of interests 7. Fees 8. Negligence and lawyers 9. Litigation Alternative dispute resolution Third parties Business ethics Lawyers' social responsibilities Gender, race, and diversity in the legal profession Applying legal theories. He is a widely published author across several disciplines, including criminal law, family law, and legal ethics. Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Academic Skip to main content. Day in the Life game online version. Day in the Life game in-class activity. Chapter 2 - The First Amendment. The First Amendment in the digital age. The Freedom of Information Act. First, a story. And a question. Or two. Looking for and reporting the truth. Suggested additional reading 3. Chapter 4 - Early Journalism and Journalism in the 20th Century. Perspectives on journalism: Journalism as history. Chapter 5 - Investigations. Why bother investigating? You don't need an army Chapter 6 - Digital Journalism and Trends. Media Ethics at Work | SAGE Publications Inc The deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales, Dodi al-Fayed and their driver in August tragically highlighted the way such figures are often hounded by the news media to the extent that they can have little privacy or peace regarding even the most intimate aspects of their lives. It may be thought that such media intrusion is far from justifiable. If, however, there is a link between the two, as Archard suggests, then the media attention devoted to the lives of the royals and celebrities is morally justifiable even though we may rightfully deplore the form such intrusion may take in a particular case. Cram argues that, given a lack of political will to institute a direct right of privacy, enforceable by the courts, it is worth paying greater attention to the nonlegal forms of privacy protection provided by regulators and current codes of media practice. Importantly, Cram goes on to consider how the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms could, if incorporated into domestic law, provide the most substantial means by which to protect privacy. They go on to examine the likely effectiveness of increasing legal restrictions and the costs and benefits of self- xiv Matthew Kieran regulation. Especially when gossip comes to be seen to constitute news as such, the problem arises as to the forms of redress ordinary people, unable to avail themselves of the legal and regulatory avenues open to those better off, have open to them when their privacy and lives have been abused by the press. Nigel Warburton switches focus to ethical problems arising from the nature of the photographic medium. Many people are worried about the ethical problems which new media technology seems to raise. For example, the possibility of creating flawless images may undermine the trust we place in photojournalism as bearing faithful witness to an event as it happened. What it does show, however, is that news photographers must retain a commitment to retaining the causal link from the resulting image back to the originating event. For the point of photojournalism is to retain a link to the actual world so that we can understand what was true of an actual event. These worries basically amount to three claims. Namely, that it cultivates in viewers, falsely, the assumption that how things are depicted is, in fact, the way things must be. Secondly, that television indulges a fantastical, morally dubious form of escapism. Thirdly, that as a medium television precludes the use of our imagination. But, Carroll argues, these worries turn out to be unfounded. Essentially, they fail to take account of the complex ways in which we understand and respond to television, or rely on an overly simplistic view of the nature of our emotions. Thus, Carroll concludes, the television medium or image is not inherently immoral though we may nonetheless have worries about the content of certain programmes. The premiss that watching such programmes will cultivate a tendency to be violent is, Graham argues, highly debatable for all but a very few. Moreover, even were harm to result from such programmes, this would not legitimate censorship. After all, we know that allowing cars on the road will directly lead to the deaths of a number of individuals each year. But the freedoms at stake are more important than the resultant harm. The interesting point about reports or films which make gratuitous use of violent or sexual imagery, Graham argues, is their failure to engage our interest in order to deepen our understanding. Thus we should, perhaps, ask why it is that our artistic and journalistic communities are failing us. Introduction xv The last article in the collection, by Anthony Ellis, follows on to address arguments over censorship and the media. Obviously freedom of speech is valuable and ought to be protected, to some extent, against government interference given the primary importance of individual freedom. Ultimately, he argues, the harm involved in such restrictions is so great that even proven harm resulting from free speech should not be prohibited unless it is of a very high degree. But Ellis also goes on to consider whether not just harm but offence can constitute grounds for prohibition. Yet the notion of offence is intrinsically tied to morality. Given this link, at least within a liberal framework, offence cannot constitute sufficient grounds for censorship because the liberal state has no business in legislating for morality. Indeed, deeply held beliefs and moral convictions often need to be attacked. Legislation to protect the feelings of those who cherish certain beliefs is, at best, mistaken, and at worst, deeply pernicious.