The Largest and Oldest Living Organism
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Intelligent Design, Abiogenesis, and Learning from History: Dennis R
Author Exchange Intelligent Design, Abiogenesis, and Learning from History: Dennis R. Venema A Reply to Meyer Dennis R. Venema Weizsäcker’s book The World View of Physics is still keeping me very busy. It has again brought home to me quite clearly how wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. If in fact the frontiers of knowledge are being pushed back (and that is bound to be the case), then God is being pushed back with them, and is therefore continually in retreat. We are to find God in what we know, not in what we don’t know; God wants us to realize his presence, not in unsolved problems but in those that are solved. Dietrich Bonhoeffer1 am thankful for this opportunity to nature, is the result of intelligence. More- reply to Stephen Meyer’s criticisms over, this assertion is proffered as the I 2 of my review of his book Signature logical basis for inferring design for the in the Cell (hereafter Signature). Meyer’s origin of biological information: if infor- critiques of my review fall into two gen- mation only ever arises from intelli- eral categories. First, he claims I mistook gence, then the mere presence of Signature for an argument against bio- information demonstrates design. A few logical evolution, rendering several of examples from Signature make the point my arguments superfluous. Secondly, easily: Meyer asserts that I have failed to refute … historical scientists can show that his thesis by not providing a “causally a presently acting cause must have adequate alternative explanation” for the been present in the past because the origin of life in that the few relevant cri- proposed candidate is the only known tiques I do provide are “deeply flawed.” cause of the effect in question. -
The Hidden Kingdom
INTRODUCTION Fungi—The Hidden Kingdom OBJECTIVE • To provide students with basic knowledge about fungi Activity 0.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION The following text provides an introduction to the fungi. It is written with the intention of sparking curiosity about this GRADES fascinating biological kingdom. 4-6 with a K-3 adaptation TEACHER INSTRUCTIONS TYPE OF ACTIVITY 1. With your class, brainstorm everything you know about fungi. Teacher read/comprehension 2. For younger students, hand out the question sheet before you begin the teacher read and have them follow along and MATERIALS answer the questions as you read. • copies of page 11 3. For older students, inform them that they will be given a • pencils brainteaser quiz (that is not for evaluation) after you finish reading the text. VOCABULARY 4. The class can work on the questions with partners or in groups bioremediation and then go over the answers as a class. Discuss any chitin particularly interesting facts and encourage further fungi independent research. habitat hyphae K-3 ADAPTATION kingdom 1. To introduce younger students to fungi, you can make a KWL lichens chart either as a class or individually. A KWL chart is divided moulds into three parts. The first tells what a student KNOWS (K) mushrooms about a subject before it is studied in class. The second part mycelium tells what the student WANTS (W) to know about that subject. mycorrhizas The third part tells what the child LEARNED (L) after studying nematodes that subject. parasitic fungi 2. Share some of the fascinating fungal facts presented in the photosynthesis “Fungi—The Hidden Kingdom” text with your students. -
Framing Major Prebiotic Transitions As Stages of Protocell Development: Three Challenges for Origins-Of-Life Research
Framing major prebiotic transitions as stages of protocell development: three challenges for origins-of-life research Ben Shirt-Ediss1, Sara Murillo-Sánchez2,3 and Kepa Ruiz-Mirazo*2,3 Commentary Open Access Address: Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 1388–1395. 1Interdisciplinary Computing and Complex BioSystems Group, doi:10.3762/bjoc.13.135 University of Newcastle, UK, 2Dept. Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of the Basque Country, Spain and 3Biofisika Institute Received: 16 February 2017 (CSIC, UPV-EHU), Spain Accepted: 27 June 2017 Published: 13 July 2017 Email: Kepa Ruiz-Mirazo* - [email protected] This article is part of the Thematic Series "From prebiotic chemistry to molecular evolution". * Corresponding author Guest Editor: L. Cronin Keywords: functional integration; origins of life; prebiotic evolution; protocells © 2017 Shirt-Ediss et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut. License and terms: see end of document. Abstract Conceiving the process of biogenesis as the evolutionary development of highly dynamic and integrated protocell populations provides the most appropriate framework to address the difficult problem of how prebiotic chemistry bridged the gap to full-fledged living organisms on the early Earth. In this contribution we briefly discuss the implications of taking dynamic, functionally inte- grated protocell systems (rather than complex reaction networks in bulk solution, sets of artificially evolvable replicating molecules, or even these same replicating molecules encapsulated in passive compartments) -
The Concept of Organism, a Historical and Conceptual Critique
Do organisms have an ontological status? Charles T. Wolfe Unit for History and Philosophy of Science University of Sydney [email protected] forthcoming in History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 32:2-3 (2010) Abstract The category of „organism‟ has an ambiguous status: is it scientific or is it philosophical? Or, if one looks at it from within the relatively recent field or sub-field of philosophy of biology, is it a central, or at least legitimate category therein, or should it be dispensed with? In any case, it has long served as a kind of scientific “bolstering” for a philosophical train of argument which seeks to refute the “mechanistic” or “reductionist” trend, which has been perceived as dominant since the 17th century, whether in the case of Stahlian animism, Leibnizian monadology, the neo-vitalism of Hans Driesch, or, lastly, of the “phenomenology of organic life” in the 20th century, with authors such as Kurt Goldstein, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and Georges Canguilhem. In this paper I try to reconstruct some of the main interpretive „stages‟ or „layers‟ of the concept of organism in order to critically evaluate it. How might „organism‟ be a useful concept if one rules out the excesses of „organismic‟ biology and metaphysics? Varieties of instrumentalism and what I call the „projective‟ concept of organism are appealing, but perhaps ultimately unsatisfying. 1. What is an organism? There have been a variety of answers to this question, not just in the sense of different definitions (an organism is a biological individual; it is a living being, or at least the difference between a living organism and a dead organism is somehow significant in a way that does not seem to make sense for other sorts of entities, like lamps and chairs; it is a self-organizing, metabolic system; etc.) but more tendentiously, in the 1 sense that philosophers, scientists, „natural philosophers‟ and others have both asserted and denied the existence of organisms. -
And White-Rot in Wood-Decay -Omics Data of Two Armillaria Species
microorganisms Article Hallmarks of Basidiomycete Soft- and White-Rot in Wood-Decay -Omics Data of Two Armillaria Species Neha Sahu 1,2, Zsolt Merényi 1, Balázs Bálint 1, Brigitta Kiss 1, György Sipos 3,4 , Rebecca A. Owens 5 and László G. Nagy 1,6,* 1 Biological Research Center, Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, 6726 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected] (N.S.); [email protected] (Z.M.); [email protected] (B.B.); [email protected] (B.K.) 2 Doctoral School of Biology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, 6726 Szeged, Hungary 3 Research Center for Forestry and Wood Industry, Functional Genomics and Bioinformatics Group, University of Sopron, 9400 Sopron, Hungary; [email protected] 4 Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland 5 Department of Biology, Maynooth University, W23 F2H6 Kildare, Ireland; [email protected] 6 Department of Plant Anatomy, Institute of Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Wood-decaying Basidiomycetes are among the most efficient degraders of plant cell walls, making them key players in forest ecosystems, global carbon cycle, and in bio-based industries. Recent insights from -omics data revealed a high functional diversity of wood-decay strategies, especially among the traditional white-rot and brown-rot dichotomy. We examined the mechanistic bases of wood-decay in the conifer-specialists Armillaria ostoyae and Armillaria cepistipes using tran- scriptomic and proteomic approaches. Armillaria spp. (Fungi, Basidiomycota) include devastating pathogens of temperate forests and saprotrophs that decay wood. They have been discussed as white-rot species, though their response to wood deviates from typical white-rotters. -
Phylogeography and Host Range of Armillaria Gallica in Riparian Forests of the Northern Great Plains, USA
Received: 28 August 2020 | Revised: 7 November 2020 | Accepted: 18 November 2020 DOI: 10.1111/efp.12663 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Phylogeography and host range of Armillaria gallica in riparian forests of the northern Great Plains, USA Brandon C. Alveshere1 | Shawn McMurtrey2 | Patrick Bennett3 | Mee-Sook Kim4 | John W. Hanna5 | Ned B. Klopfenstein5 | James T. Blodgett6 | Jared M. LeBoldus2,7 1Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Connecticut, Abstract Storrs, CT, USA Root disease pathogens, including Armillaria, are a leading cause of growth loss and 2 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, tree mortality in forest ecosystems of North America. Armillaria spp. have a wide Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA 3USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, host range and can cause significant reductions in tree growth that may lead to mor- Forest Health Protection, Missoula, MT, USA tality. DNA sequence comparisons and phylogenetic studies have allowed a better 4 USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest understanding of Armillaria spp. taxonomic diversity. Genetic sequencing has facili- Research Station, Corvallis, OR, USA tated the mapping of species distributions and host associations, providing insights 5USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow, ID, USA into Armillaria ecology. These studies can help to inform forest management and are 6 USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain essential in the development of disease risk maps, leading to more effective man- Region, Forest Health Protection, Rapid City, SD, USA agement strategies for Armillaria root disease. Armillaria surveys were conducted on 7Department of Forest Engineering, publicly owned lands in North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska, U.S.A. Surveyed Resources, and Management, Oregon State stands consisted of riparian forests ≥0.4 hectares in area. -
Bacteria – Friend Or Foe?
Bacteria – Friend or Foe? By Rachel L. Dittmar & Rosa M. Santana Carrero [email protected], [email protected] April 2020 Danger! Sick! Gross! Vaccine! Disease! Medicine! Dirty! MRSA! Eww! E. coli! What is the first thing that comes to mind when you hear “bacteria”? Science! Microscope! MRSA! Salmonella! Hospital! Germs! Staph! Food! Small! 2 Introduction to Bacteria 3 Bacterial nomenclature • Bacteria are referred to by their genus and species, with genus coming first and species coming last: Escherichia coli Escherichia: genus Species: coli Bacteria names are ALWAYS italicized. Genus names are capitalized and species names are not. Sometimes, the genus is abbreviated by its first initial: E. coli 4 Bacteria are prokaryotes. 5 What are prokaryotes? • Plasma membrane separates the cell from its surrounding environment • Cytoplasm contains organelles • Contain DNA consisting of a single large, circular chromosome • Ribosomes make proteins 6 Prokaryotes v. Eukaryotes 7 Image from: https://www.difference.wiki/prokaryotic-cell-vs-eukaryotic-cell/ How do these organisms differ? Prokaryotes Eukaryotes - circular DNA - linear DNA (found in nucleus) - no nucleus - nucleus - no membrane bound organelles - membrane bound organelles - small- less than 10μm - larger than 10μm - unicellular - can be unicellular and multicellular 8 Bacteria are very small. 9 How big are bacteria? Bacteria are very small: 0.1 – 5.0 micrometers. A micrometer (μm) is 0.000001 meters or 0.001 millimeters (mm) For comparison, a human hair is 30 – 100 μm Image from: https://www.khanacademy.org/science/high-school-biology/hs-cells/hs-prokaryotes-and-eukaryotes/a/prokaryotic-cells 10 Bacteria are classified by phenotype or genotype. -
Armillaria the Genus Armillaria Armillaria in North Contains About 40 Species of America
2006 No. 3 The many facets of Armillaria The genus Armillaria Armillaria in North contains about 40 species of America. Fortunately, important wood-rot fungi which physical features do are widely distributed across the separate some of the world. Their basic behaviour is species, and the fairly similar, because all the species well documented invade plant roots and cause a geographical ranges of progressive white rot. For this the mushrooms help reason, all these fungi were at one to separate others time grouped into a single species, The classic Armillaria mellea; however, they Honey Mushroom, are now separated based on Armillaria mellea, morphology, physiology, turns out to be pathogenicity, and geographical limited mostly to distribution. eastern North Since so many species of America, so the Armillaria look alike, mycologists Honey Mushrooms we have “mated” Armillaria species in collect and eat in the lab. They grow two species, in Alberta are not a single Petri dish and observe the Armillaria mellea, resulting reaction once the two but one or two other expanding colonies meet in the species of Armillaria. middle of the dish. They discovered that some Honey Morphology Mushrooms would take to one Cap: 3-15 cm, convex another, while others turned up to broadly convex or Photo courtesy: Martin Osis their fungal noses at the idea of plane in age; the margin often pairing up. Thus, using the arched at maturity; dry or tacky; vaguely radially arranged. “biological species concept” (in color extremely variable, but Gills: Attached or slightly basic terms, if they cannot mate, typically honey yellow; smooth, or decurrrent, nearly distant; whitish, they belong to separate species), we with a few tiny, dark scales sometimes bruising or discolouring now define ten species of concentrated near the centre and darker. -
Single-Celled Organisms
Single-Celled Organisms • Humans are made up of millions of tiny cells (multi-celled organisms). • Microorganisms are made up of only ONE cell (single-celled organisms) 1.Single-celled organisms are simple life forms Include: bacteria, protists and others. They move, find food, grow, and make new organisms. 2. Bacteria are one-celled organisms that do NOT have a nucleus. The material that is usually in a nucleus can be found all over the cytoplasm instead. More bacteria on earth than any other living thing Some bacteria are helpful, and some are harmful. One handful of soil can contain billions of bacteria. 3. Protists are a kind of single-celled organism. They live everywhere including pond water, saltwater, animals, and humans Amoebas have a cell membrane, cytoplasm, and a nucleus They move by: changing their shape. 4. Algae are plant-like organisms that Live in water, moist places, and under rocks Among the oldest things on earth! Algae have a cell membrane, cytoplasm, nucleus, and chloroplast. Algae produce most of the oxygen that you breathe! 5. How do single-celled organisms move? Tail-like parts called flagella Hair like structures called cilia Paramecium also use their cilia to get food Multi-Celled Organisms Multi-celled organism is made of up of more than one cell. Plants, animals and other living things. Made up of different kinds of cells that have certain jobs to do. Muscle cells, white blood cells, and nerve cells For example: the cells that make up your heart work together to move oxygen and blood to other cells throughout your body. -
Laminated Root Rot in a Western Washington Plantation: 8-Year Mortality and Growth of Douglas-Fir As Related to Infected Stumps, Tree Density, and Fertilization
United States Department of Laminated Root Rot in a Western Agriculture Washington Plantation: 8-Year Forest Service Mortality and Growth of Douglas- Pacific Northwest Research Station Fir as Related to Infected Stumps, Research Paper PNW-RP-569 Tree Density, and Fertilization November 2006 Richard E. Miller, Timothy B. Harrington, Walter G. Thies, and Jeff Madsen The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795- 3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. -
Biology 197: Principles of Organismal Biology Section B: T, R 9:30–10:45 AM Section D: T, R 1:30–2:45 PM Spring 2011 Birck Hall 003 Instructor: Dr
Biology 197: Principles of Organismal Biology Section B: T, R 9:30–10:45 AM Section D: T, R 1:30–2:45 PM Spring 2011 Birck Hall 003 Instructor: Dr. Phil Novack‐Gottshall Office: Birck 332 E‐mail: Blackboard mail preferred Office hours: T 11–1:30, W 11–1, R 11–12:30 (or pnovack‐[email protected]) or by appointment Course Description Organismal biology is one of the major branches of biology and is concerned with all aspects of the life of organisms, including their biodiversity, anatomical structure, physiology, development, biogeography, and ecology. This course is an introductory course required for all biological sciences majors, but it is also useful for gaining basic biological literacy and for those pursuing careers in human and veterinary medicine, psychiatry, agriculture, forestry, microbiology, conservation, ecology, paleontology, environmental science, law, political science, and even cooking, cheese making, and brewing of alcohol. In this class, we will learn the major groups of animals, fungi, plants, protists, algae, and bacteria; their basic characteristics; and how biologists study these organisms to understand their rich evolutionary history, ecological interactions, amazing adaptations, and relevance to humans and other species. In particular, you will practice learning how to view the world and to think like an organismal biologist. Learning objectives 1) Explain the scientific method of organismal biologists to understand the natural world. 2) Identify the major lineages of life through study of their biodiversity, anatomy, physiology, development, behavior, biogeography, fossil record, and ecology. 3) Explain the significance of major transitions in organismal evolution: photosynthesis, endosymbiosis, sexual reproduction, multicellularity, skeletonization, cephalization, terrestrialization, mobility, and carnivory, among others. -
Quantifying the Origins of Life on a Planetary Scale
Quantifying the origins of life on a planetary scale Caleb Scharfa,1 and Leroy Croninb,1 aColumbia Astrobiology Center, Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, New York, NY 10027; and bSchool of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom Edited by Neta A. Bahcall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved May 17, 2016 (received for review November 23, 2015) A simple, heuristic formula with parallels to the Drake Equation is currently impossible to construct a first principles quantitative introduced to help focus discussion on open questions for the origins estimate of an abiogenesis probability for the young Earth. It is of life in a planetary context. This approach indicates a number of also the case that we typically conflate the idea of “microabio- areas where quantitative progress can be made on parameter genesis”— namely, a highly localized assembly of molecular estimation for determining origins of life probabilities, based on structures that meets the minimum criterion for a living system— constraints from Bayesian approaches. We discuss a variety of “micro- with “macro-” or planet-wide abiogenesis. In other words the idea scale” factors and their role in determining “macroscale” abiogenesis of life arising on a planet is treated as a singular event rather than probabilities on suitable planets. We also propose that impact ejecta a possible accumulation of many microscale events, each of which exchange between planets with parallel chemistries and chemical evo- might be considered an origin event in its own right, and are ar- lution could in principle amplify the development of molecular com- guably more accessible through laboratory or modeling investi- plexity and abiogenesis probabilities.