DOCSLIB.ORG

Locally Preferred Alternative for a Modern Streetcar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Locally Preferred Alternative for a Modern Streetcar LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Modern Streetcar W. 7th - Hwy 5/Fort Snelling RIVERVIEW riverviewcorridor.com CORRIDOR Saint Paul – Bloomington, Minnesota The Riverview Corridor connects METROO GreenGreen Line connection neighborhoods, historic districts, businesses, thriving commercial Smith Ave. conceptscepts Downtown districts and downtown Saint Paul Minneapolis Saint Paul Hiaw to the regional transportation M atha i s s Saint Paul i Av s network. It includes Union Depot s i e p p i GGrraand R and Lowertown, downtown Minnehaha St. Clair Ave i v e r Saint Paul, Seven Corners, West 7th St. Clair Randolph Ave Av and Highland Park neighborhoods, e Randolph W. 7th St Minneapolis-St. Paul International E 46th St Airport, Bloomington’s South Loop Minnehaha Pkwy Da r ve u Otto Ford rn St SpurSp and the Mall of America. 50th St Site Canadian Pacific Montreal Spur segment The Riverview Corridor Policy HomerH 54th St Hwy 5 river Advisory Committee approved crossing concepts I-35 E a modern streetcar route along Maynard Davern 5 Fort Snelling H West 7th Street as the Locally THT Historic Preferred Alternative (LPA) in Fort Snelling TH 2017. The LPA was adopted by 55 Terminal 1 METRO Blue Line the Metropolitan Council into connection the region’s Transportation Terminal 2 Policy Plan in 2019. Operating Environment e. • Dedicated and shared use. Av h t 4 • Dedicated connections with METRO Green and Blue lines. The new modern streetcar line will 3 share segments of track, stations • Decisions will be made in future phases to determine. Mall of which segments will be dedicated vs. shared use. and other infrastructure with America existing METRO Blue and Green light rail lines and also connect Key Existing Station Riverview Locally to planned Bus Rapid Transit Preferred Alternative Bloomington South Riverview Station METRO Blue Line Loop concepts METRO Green Line corridors serving the Twin Cities # SSub-option to be analyzed in futuf re project phase Metro Transit A Line BRT East Metro area. NORTH Key characteristics of Riverview locally preferred alternative # ROUTE TOTAL 2040 DAILY ESTIMATED TRAVEL RIDERSHIP OPERATION & LENGTH NUMBER OF CAPITAL MAINTENANCE KeyTIM characteristicsE of Riverview locally preferred alternative STATIONS COST COST (2027$) 11.7 Total 20,400 (2029$) 44 min. 20 # Transit-dependent $ M miles 4,600 $2.066B per year New Riders 2,700 ROUTE TOTAL 2040 DAILY ESTIMATED TRAVEL RIDERSHIP OPERATION & LENGTH NUMBER OF CAPITAL MAINTENANCE TIME STATIONS COST COST (2027$) 11.7 Total 20,400 (2029$) 20 44 min. RiverviewCorridor.comTransit-dependent $ M miles 4,600 $2.066B per year New Riders 2,700 Community Engagement Meaningful community engagement is critical to informed decision making and building trust among residents and business owners. Ramsey County is committed to continue public engagement through the Engineering and Pre-Environmental analysis and design process. Next steps The Engineering and Pre-Environmental Phase of the project begins October 2020 and continues through 2023. This phase will examine impacts and gather detailed information to inform the project’s preliminary design. Federal Transit Administration Process Modern Streetcar chosen as Engineering and Project Final Locally Preferred Alternative Pre-Environmental Phase Development Engineering Construction 3 Years 3 Years 2 Years 3 Years 3-4 Years Operations Ongoing Public Engagement WE ARE HERE RiverviewCorridor.com.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Locally Preferred Alternative
    Locally Preferred Alternative Work In Progress; Subject To Change Without Notice 1 Riverview Corridor Study Area • 12 mile study area between Saint Paul and Bloomington. • Connects major destinations, neighborhoods and job concentrations. • Serves growing and diverse population and employment areas. • 50,600 residents and 123,900 jobs. • Provides regional and local connectivity. Work In Progress; Subject To Change Without Notice 2 Study Process Completed August 2015 Completed August 2017 December, 2017 CORRIDOR VISION ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE • Current and future • Initial Screening. • Vehicle and route conditions. (completed February 2016) of Locally Preferred • Review of relevant work. • Detailed Definition. Alternative. • Purpose and need. • Detailed Evaluation. • Implementation Plan. March – August 2017 • Goals and objectives. Public Engagement • Examined 60 different alternatives. • Engaged over 4,600 people via nearly 100 events responding to nearly individual 650 comments. Work In Progress; Subject To Change Without Notice 3 Community Engagement More than 4,600 people participated in the Riverview Study through community events including open houses, business outreach, presentations, pop-up events, social media, and online engagement forms. Work In Progress; Subject To Change Without Notice 4 What We Heard • Rail transit’s ease of use is preferred. • Transit system connectivity, e.g. to airport. • Transit saves employees cost of parking • Concern about business and neighborhood impacts. • Keep Ford Site in mind throughout the study. • Route 54: Good service frequency, but crowded. • Improve transit service – frequent, fast, reliable. Work In Progress; Subject To Change Without Notice 5 Community Input has Shaped the Process • Purpose and need for transit improvements. • Goals and objectives. • Routes and vehicles to study • Potential station locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation, Urban Design, and the Environment 2003
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. 3. Recipients Accession No. CTS 03-04 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Transportation, Urban Design and the Environment: January 18, 2003 Highway 61/Red Rock Corridor 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Lance M. Neckar 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. Department of Landscape Architecture University of Minnesota 11. Contract (C) or Grant (G) No. 1425 University Ave S.E. Room 115 Minneapolis, MN 55414 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Boulevard Mail Stop 330 14. Sponsoring Agency Code St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words) This report is a combination of two reports (Task 1 and Task 2 and 3) on the Highway 61/Red Rock Commuter Rail Corridor. The Task 1 portion describes the baseline conditions related to subdivision-scaled growth in the corridor, with particular concentration on Cottage Grove, one of the station sites. Also considered are current plans for the downtown St. Paul Union Depot. The Task 2 and 3 portion focuses on issues relating to the relationship between transportation and the environment. An important issue in this study, therefore, is the design and institutional integration of objectives across investments in transit services at a regional scale, public space, and the long-term value of developed private space, especially in suburbia. The report offers designs for new, alternative patterns of regional growth, both urban and suburban, in broad corridors served by commuter rail service.
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Line Joint Powers Board Agenda
    GOLD LINE JOINT POWERS BOARD AGENDA Wednesday, April 28, 2021 11:00 A.M. Call: 1-404-397-1516 Access Code: 177 393 4974 Password: GoldLine2021! Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, board members and staff are conducting this meeting electronically. Members of the public who wish to share their comments or concerns may email [email protected] or by telephone at 651-430-4300. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. ACTION ITEMS - a. Meeting Agenda b. March 24, 2021 Meeting Minutes * c. Resolution 2021-04- Approving the Use of Grant Funds for Pre-Award Authority Expenditures for Right-of-Way Acquisition and Relocation * d. Resolution 2021-05 - Approving the Use of Grant Funds for Pre-Award Authority Expenditures for Advanced Utility Relocation (AUR) * e. Resolution 2021-06 - Approval of the Gold Line BRT Cost, Budget, Scope and Schedule at 60% Design * f. Resolution 2021-07 - Approval of Amendment #1 to the Gold Line Joint Powers Agreement * IV. INFORMATION ITEMS - a. METRO Gold Line Update b. Joint Powers Board Financial Update c. Communications and Legislative Update * d. Next Meeting – May 26, 2021, 10:30 AM-12:00 PM, Electronic Meeting V. ADJOURNMENT * Attachments 1 GOLD LINE JOINT POWERS BOARD REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION AGENDA ITEM NO. III b. GOLD LINE JOINT POWERS BOARD DRAFT MINUTES Wednesday, March 24, 2021 CALL TO ORDER Chair McDonough called to order the Gold Line Joint Powers Board (JPB) meeting at 10:35 a.m. Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, board members and staff conducted the meeting virtually via WebEx.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum March 3, 2021
    Memorandum March 3, 2021 To Representative Frank Hornstein From Matt Burress, Legislative Analyst Andy Lee, Fiscal Analyst Subject Transitway local funding You had asked for information on transitway finance in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, in the context of questions on a transitway funding provision in Governor Walz’s budget proposal. This memo discusses some of the historical background, provides an overview of requirements in current law, summarizes the Governor’s recommendation, and highlights some implications. I. Historical Context Funding Overview There has been historical variability in the funding structures and sources across the Twin Cities metro area transitway lines (e.g., the Hiawatha/Blue Line light rail transit (LRT), Central Corridor/Green Line LRT, Orange Line bus rapid transit (BRT), Cedar Avenue/Red Line BRT, Gateway/Gold Line dedicated BRT, and Northstar Commuter Rail). Each project either has or is proposed to involve a different mix of federal, state, regional, and local sources. In broad terms, key funding sources have included: . federal grants; . state general obligation (G.O.) bonds; . state General Fund appropriations; . county sales tax revenue, including from each county and from the former Counties Transit Improvement Board (CTIB); and . property tax revenue from counties and county regional railroad authorities. All transitway projects rely heavily on federal grants, which for most projects have accounted for close to 50% of the capital costs. However, there has been wide variation in non-federal funding across projects. For example, about 40.5% of the capital funding for the Southwest (Green Line extension) LRT project comes from county sales tax sources, whereas the Hiawatha (Blue Line) LRT project predated this county funding stream and relied more heavily on state bonds and other funding partners like the Metropolitan Airports Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideway Status November 2013
    2013 Legislative Report Guideway Status November 2013 Prepared by The Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Boulevard Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 Phone: 651-366-3000 Toll-Free: 1-800-657-3774 TTY, Voice or ASCII: 1-800-627-3529 In collaboration with the Metropolitan Council 390 Robert St. North St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 Phone: 651-602-1000 To request this document in an alternative format Please call 651-366-4718 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota). You may also send an email to [email protected]. Cover Photos: Northstar commuter rail train Red Line (Cedar BRT) vehicle on at Target Field opening day Source: Metro Council Source: Metro Council Green Line (Central Corridor LRT) Blue Line (Hiawatha LRT) in vehicle on tracks for testing operation Source: Streets MN Source: Metro Council 2 Guideway Status Report November 2013 Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Legislative Request............................................................................................................................................. 5 Statutory Requirement ......................................................................................................................... 5 Cost of Report ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Common Grant Application Form
    Common Grant Application Form Date of application: September 30, 2019 Application submitted to: Wells Foundation Organization Information Name of organization Legal name, if different Move Minnesota St. Paul Transportation Management Organization Address City, State, Zip Employer Identification Number (EIN) 2446 University Avenue W. Suite 170 Saint Paul 41-1906261 Phone Fax Website (651) 767-0298 (651) 789-1001 www.movemn.org Name of top paid staff Title Phone E-mail Linnea House Interim Executive Director (651) 789-1411 [email protected] Name of contact person regarding this Title Phone E-mail application Elissa Schufman Donor & Funder Relations (651) 789-1415 [email protected] Is your organization an IRS 501(c)(3) not-for-profit? X Yes No If no, is your organization a public agency/unit of government? Yes X No If no, check with funder for details on using fiscal agents, and list name and address of fiscal agent: Fiscal agent’s EIN number Proposal Information Please give a 2-3 sentence summary of request: Move Minnesota requests $5,000 in general operating support to continue leading the movement for an equitable transportation system that puts people first. Access to sustainable and public transportation is hugely influential in a host of other connected regional challenges, including housing stability, food security, job access, ability to accumulate wealth, educational attainment, and more. Population served: Geographic area served: MSP metro-area residents, transit-dependent populations, MSP metro area low-income communities, communities of color Funds are being requested for (check one) Note: Please be sure funder provides the type of support you are requesting.
    [Show full text]
  • RIVERVIEW TRANSIT CORRIDOR AMENDMENT to the 2040 TRANSPORTATION POLICY PLAN Public Comment Report Nov
    RIVERVIEW TRANSIT CORRIDOR AMENDMENT TO THE 2040 TRANSPORTATION POLICY PLAN Public Comment Report Nov. 29, 2018 through Jan. 21, 2019 February 2019 The Council’s mission is to foster efficient and economic growth for a prosperous metropolitan region Metropolitan Council Members Nora Slawik Chair Edward Reynoso District 9 Vacant District 1 Marie McCarthy District 10 Lona Schreiber District 2 Sandy Rummel District 11 Jennifer Munt District 3 Harry Melander District 12 Deb Barber District 4 Richard Kramer District 13 Vacant District 5 Jon Commers District 14 Gail Dorfman District 6 Steven T. Chávez District 15 Gary L. Cunningham District 7 Wendy Wulff District 16 Cara Letofsky District 8 The Metropolitan Council is the regional planning organization for the seven-county Twin Cities area. The Council operates the regional bus and rail system, collects and treats wastewater, coordinates regional water resources, plans and helps fund regional parks, and administers federal funds that provide housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income individuals and families. The 17-member Council board is appointed by and serves at the pleasure of the governor. On request, this publication will be made available in alternative formats to people with disabilities. Call Metropolitan Council information at 651-602-1140 or TTY 651-291-0904. Comment Overview This comment report summarizes comments received for the draft amendment to the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan to include the locally preferred alternative of Modern Streetcar for the Riverview transit corridor in the Current Revenue Scenario of the plan. The draft plan was released for the purposes of public comment on Nov. 29, 2018 and comments were accepted through Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Arterial BRT Final Report
    Identifying the Next Arterial Bus Rapid Transit Lines February 2021 Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 What is Network Next? ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 The Arterial BRT Network ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Network Next Principles and Arterial BRT .......................................................................................................................... 3 Planning Process .............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Step 1: Identify .............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Step 2: Screen .............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Step 3: Evaluate ........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reviving MILWAUKEE Through Light Rail
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com FEBRUARY 2019 NO. 974 REVIVING MILWAUKEE THROUGH LIGHT RAIL China opens two new tramways and 372km of metro Lisboa tram overturns injuring 28 Projects on hold due to TfL shortfall Ulm opens line 2 to double its tramway Sounds of silence Tram-train £4.60 Managing light rail Lessons shared from noise and vibration the UK pilot scheme “I am delighted that the UK Light Rail Conference is coming back to Greater Manchester in 2019. “Metrolink forms a key backbone of sustainable travel for the region as it continues to grow, so this important two-day event offers an invaluable chance to network with peers from around the world and share knowledge and best practice as we all aim to improve the way we plan, build and deliver exceptional light rail services to passengers.” Manchester Danny Vaughan 23-24 July 2019 head of Metrolink – transport for Greater Manchester “An excellent event, providing a stimulating and varied two-day programme addressing current The industry’s premier exhibition and knowledge-sharing and future issues pertinent to Voices event returns to Manchester for 2019! today’s light rail industry” V from the clive Pennington With unrivalled networking opportunities, this invaluable technical Director – Light rail, industry… two-day congress is well-known as the place to do amey consulting & rail business and build long-lasting relationships. There is no better place to gain true insight into the “I thought the whole conference was great – there was a workings of the sector and help shape its future.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the REGULAR MEETING of the TAAC COMMITTEE Wednesday, February 5, 2020
    Minutes of the REGULAR MEETING OF THE TAAC COMMITTEE Wednesday, February 5, 2020 Committee Members Present: Chair David Fenley, Sam Jasmine, Patsy Murphy, Ken Rodgers, Jeffry Dains. Vice Chair Darrell Paulsen, Kari Sheldon, Heidi Myhre, Claudia Fuglie, Patty Thorsen, Diane Graham-Raff, Kody Olson, Erik Henricksen and Richard Rowan. Committee Members Absent: None Committee Members Excused: Christopher Bates and John Clark Council Staff Present: Amy Vennewitz, Sara Maaske, Mitzi Kennedy, Andy Streasick, Doug Cook, Christine Kuennen, Heidi Schallberg, Richard Koop, Nick Thompson and Alison Coleman. Public Present: Sheila Holbrook-White and Nichole Villavicencio CALL TO ORDER A quorum being present, Committee Chair Fenley called the regular meeting of the Council's TAAC Committee to order at 12:30 p.m. on Wednesday, February 5, 2020. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES It was moved by Vice Chair Paulsen, seconded by Thorsen to approve the agenda. Motion carried. It was moved by Daines, seconded by Jasmine to approve the minutes of the December 4, 2019 regular meeting of the TAAC Committee. Motion carried. BUSINESS & INFORMATION 1. Transportation Policy Plan Amy Vennewitz, Deputy Director MTS spoke to the TAAC committee. I lead the long-range transportation planning group here at the Metropolitan Council. The last time you would have seen me would have been a year and a half ago. One of the primary products that my group of planners produces is the Regional Transportation Policy Plan. We last updated that in late 2018. October 2018 was the adoption. Then we amended it May of 2019 to add the Riverview Corridor as a transitway in our funded system plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Design Options for the Riverview Corridor Streetcar Along West 7Th Street
    Urban Design Options for the Riverview Corridor Streetcar along West 7th Street Prepared by: Students in DES 3331: Street Life and Urban Design Seminar Instructor: Jen Krava, Interdisciplinary Design Program College of Design Prepared in Collaboration with: Frank Alarcon, Planning Specialist, Ramsey County Public Works The project on which this report is based was completed in collaboration with Ramsey County as part of the 2018–2019 Resilient Communities Project (RCP) partnership. RCP is a program at the University of Minnesota’s Center for Urban and Regional Affairs (CURA) that connects University faculty and students with Minnesota communities to address strategic projects that advance local resilience and sustainability. The contents of this report represent the views of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect those of RCP, CURA, the Regents of the University of Minnesota, or Ramsey County. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. Any reproduction, distribution, or derivative use of this work under this license must be accompanied by the following attribution: “Produced by the Resilient Communities Project at the University of Minnesota. Reproduced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.” This publication may be available in alternate formats upon request. Resilient Communities Project University of Minnesota 330 HHHSPA 301—19th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 Phone: (612) 625-7501 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.rcp.umn.edu The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Transit Bus Schedule St Cloud Mn
    Metro Transit Bus Schedule St Cloud Mn Contradictive and larghetto Lazaro outspoke her Minton signore examine and reclassify syntactically. Choppily fragmented, Piotr misdeem polypodies and ballocks Nero. Diffractive Merill pieced wavily and pathetically, she detain her dealership pollard vitally. All metro transit bus schedule for twins games and reports that provides transportation from st What does it cost per ride? What about the reduction in our dependence on foreign oil? Transportation and Public Safety Committee. When is the first bus from Minneapolis to Chicago? The stop is under the parking structure and there is a waiting room for megabus. Northstar Link will run a modified schedule on the Friday after Thanksgiving, Nov. New Flyer of America in St. Sauk Rapids and route runs in clockwise direction. Fashioning your own artistic creation from glass is an enterprise unlike any other. Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings. What about the reduction in greenhouse gasses? Deep Jyoti is working with the motto of being one most quality, esteemed, and preferred brand in Nepal. Cloud State and St. Bus from Fargo to St. Solution For Water Treatment Facilities. The best way to find cheap bus tickets from St. It did not estimate potential ridership if Northstar service is expanded. Transfer between the Green and Blue Lines at US Bank Stadium Station. How long does it take to travel from Minneapolis to Chicago by bus? Ticket information currently not available. Cloud, Minnesota, filed an application with the Federal Communications Commission for renewal of its broadcast license.
    [Show full text]