Hard Rock Lithium Processing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Manufacturing Scalability Implications of Materials Choice in Inorganic Solid-State Batteries Abstract Context & Scale Intro
1 Manufacturing Scalability Implications of Materials Choice in Inorganic 2 Solid-State Batteries 3 Kevin J. Huang1, Gerbrand Ceder2, Elsa A. Olivetti1* 4 5 1Department of Materials Science & Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139; 2Department of Materials 6 Science & Engineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 7 Abstract 8 The pursuit of scalable and manufacturable all-solid-state batteries continues to intensify, motivated by the 9 rapidly increasing demand for safe, dense electrical energy storage. In this Perspective, we describe the 10 numerous, often conflicting, implications of materials choices that have been made in the search for 11 effective mitigations to the interfacial instabilities plaguing solid-state batteries. Specifically, we show that 12 the manufacturing scalability of solid-state batteries can be governed by at least three principal 13 consequences of materials selection: (1) the availability, scaling capacity, and price volatility of the chosen 14 materials’ constituents, (2) the manufacturing processes needed to integrate the chosen materials into full 15 cells, and (3) the cell performance that may be practically achieved with the chosen materials and processes. 16 While each of these factors is, in isolation, a pivotal determinant of manufacturing scalability, we show that 17 consideration and optimization of their collective effects and tradeoffs is necessary to more completely 18 chart a scalable pathway to manufacturing. 19 Context & Scale 20 With examples pulled from recent developments in solid-state batteries, we illustrate the consequences of 21 materials choice on materials availability, processing requirements and challenges, and resultant device 22 performance. We demonstrate that while each of these factors is, by itself, essential to understanding 23 manufacturing scalability, joint consideration of all three provides for a more comprehensive understanding 24 of the specific factors that could impede the scale up to production. -
L. Jahnsite, Segelerite, and Robertsite, Three New Transition Metal Phosphate Species Ll. Redefinition of Overite, an Lsotype Of
American Mineralogist, Volume 59, pages 48-59, 1974 l. Jahnsite,Segelerite, and Robertsite,Three New TransitionMetal PhosphateSpecies ll. Redefinitionof Overite,an lsotypeof Segelerite Pnur BnnN Moone Thc Departmcntof the GeophysicalSciences, The Uniuersityof Chicago, Chicago,Illinois 60637 ilt. lsotypyof Robertsite,Mitridatite, and Arseniosiderite Peur BmaN Moonp With Two Chemical Analvsesbv JUN Iro Deryrtrnent of GeologicalSciences, Haraard Uniuersity, Cambridge, Massrchusetts 02 I 38 Abstract Three new species,-jahnsite, segelerite, and robertsite,-occur in moderate abundance as late stage products in corroded triphylite-heterosite-ferrisicklerite-rockbridgeite masses, associated with leucophosphite,hureaulite, collinsite, laueite, etc.Type specimensare from the Tip Top pegmatite, near Custer, South Dakota. Jahnsite, caMn2+Mgr(Hro)aFe3+z(oH)rlPC)oln,a 14.94(2),b 7.14(l), c 9.93(1)A, p 110.16(8)", P2/a, Z : 2, specific gavity 2.71, biaxial (-), 2V large, e 1.640,p 1.658,t l.6lo, occurs abundantly as striated short to long prismatic crystals, nut brown, yellow, yellow-orange to greenish-yellowin color.Formsarec{001},a{100},il2oll, jl2}ll,ft[iol],/tolll,nt110],andz{itt}. Segeierite,CaMg(HrO)rFes+(OH)[POdz, a 14.826{5),b 18.751(4),c7.30(1)A, Pcca, Z : 8, specific gaavity2.67, biaxial (-), 2Ylarge,a 1.618,p 1.6t5, z 1.650,occurs sparingly as striated yellow'green prismaticcrystals, with c[00], r{010}, nlll0l and qll2l } with perfect {010} cleavage'It is the Feg+-analogueofoverite; a restudy on type overite revealsthe spacegroup Pcca and the ideal formula CaMg(HrO)dl(OH)[POr]r. Robertsite,carMna+r(oH)o(Hro){Ponlr, a 17.36,b lg.53,c 11.30A,p 96.0o,A2/a, Z: 8, specific gravity3.l,T,cleavage[l00] good,biaxial(-) a1.775,8 *t - 1.82,2V-8o,pleochroismextreme (Y, Z = deep reddish brown; 17 : pale reddish-pink), @curs as fibrous massesand small wedge- shapedcrystals showing c[001 f , a{1@}, qt031}. -
Alteration of Spodumene, Montebrasite and Lithiophilite In
American Mineralogist, Volume 67, pages 97-113, 1982 Alteration of spodumene,montebrasite and lithiophilite in pegmatites of the White PicachoDistrict, Arizona Davrp Lor.rooxrnNo DoNer-uM. Bunr Department of Geology Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona 85281 Abstract The crystallization sequence and metasomatic alteration of spodumene (LiAlSizOe), montebrasite(LiAIPO4(OH,F)), and lithiophilite (Li(Mn,Fe)PO+)are describedfor nine zoned lithium pegmatitesin the White Picacho district, Arizona. The observedcrystalliza- tion trends suggesta progressiveincrease in the activities of lithium species(spodumene follows microcline as the principal alkali aluminosilicate), as well as an increase in the activities of the acidic volatiles phosphorus and fluorine (montebrasite succeedsspodu- mene as the stableprimary lithium phase).Much of the lithiophilite occurs with columbite, apatite, beryl, zircon, and tourmaline in cleavelanditecomplexes that formed in part at the expenseof quartz-spodumenepegmatite. Fracture-controlledpseudomorphic alteration of the primary lithium minerals is widespread and apparently is the result of subsolidus reactionswith residualpegmatitic fluids. Spodumenehas been replacedby eucryptite, albite, and micas. Alteration products of montebrasite include low-fluorine secondary montebrasite,crandallite (tentative), hydroxylapatite, muscovite, brazilianite, augelite (tentative),scorzalite, kulanite, wyllieite, and carbonate-apatite.Secondary phases identi- fied in altered lithiophilite include hureaulite, triploidite, eosphorite, -
Atomic Spectra of Alkali Elements
Atomic Spectra of Alkali Elements S. R. Kulkarni April 10, 2020 Rydberg primarily focused on studying the lines of alkali metals (Lithium, Potassium and Sodium).1 Rydberg organized the various features by their appearance on the pho- tographs:The alkali spectra were more complicated than that of hydrogen. Rydberg recog- nized that were three different types of lines: lines which looked \sharp" (on photographic plates), \principal" (strong lines that showed up in emission and absorption) and those which appeared ‘diffuse”. These series were abbreviated to S, P, D. Later \Fundamental" (F) was added. As noted earlier, Rydberg preferred to work with wavenumbers. Using data from Liveing and Deware he recast Angstrom's formula as follows: N k = k − (1) n 1 (n + µ)2 where kn is the wavenumber of the nth line in a given series. Rydberg kept N fixed to the value measured by Balmer with k1 µ being free parameters. Rydberg found the following formulae for Lithium R ks = ks − ; 2; 3; 4; ::: (2) n 1 (n + S)2 R kp = kp − 1; 2; 3; ::: (3) n 1 (n + P )2 R kd = kd − 2; 3; 4; ::: (4) n 1 (n + D)2 s −1 p −1 where S = 0:5951, P = 0:9596, D = 0:9974, k1 = 28601:6 cm k1 = 43487:7 cm , d −1 k1 = 28598:5 cm and we have switched to the modern notation in which N is replaced by R (the value he found was R = 109721:6 cm−1). Rydberg had confidence in the data that he was able to find a deeper connection between the constants between the series. -
Washington State Minerals Checklist
Division of Geology and Earth Resources MS 47007; Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Washington State 360-902-1450; 360-902-1785 fax E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.dnr.wa.gov/geology Minerals Checklist Note: Mineral names in parentheses are the preferred species names. Compiled by Raymond Lasmanis o Acanthite o Arsenopalladinite o Bustamite o Clinohumite o Enstatite o Harmotome o Actinolite o Arsenopyrite o Bytownite o Clinoptilolite o Epidesmine (Stilbite) o Hastingsite o Adularia o Arsenosulvanite (Plagioclase) o Clinozoisite o Epidote o Hausmannite (Orthoclase) o Arsenpolybasite o Cairngorm (Quartz) o Cobaltite o Epistilbite o Hedenbergite o Aegirine o Astrophyllite o Calamine o Cochromite o Epsomite o Hedleyite o Aenigmatite o Atacamite (Hemimorphite) o Coffinite o Erionite o Hematite o Aeschynite o Atokite o Calaverite o Columbite o Erythrite o Hemimorphite o Agardite-Y o Augite o Calciohilairite (Ferrocolumbite) o Euchroite o Hercynite o Agate (Quartz) o Aurostibite o Calcite, see also o Conichalcite o Euxenite o Hessite o Aguilarite o Austinite Manganocalcite o Connellite o Euxenite-Y o Heulandite o Aktashite o Onyx o Copiapite o o Autunite o Fairchildite Hexahydrite o Alabandite o Caledonite o Copper o o Awaruite o Famatinite Hibschite o Albite o Cancrinite o Copper-zinc o o Axinite group o Fayalite Hillebrandite o Algodonite o Carnelian (Quartz) o Coquandite o o Azurite o Feldspar group Hisingerite o Allanite o Cassiterite o Cordierite o o Barite o Ferberite Hongshiite o Allanite-Ce o Catapleiite o Corrensite o o Bastnäsite -
Geology of the Hugo Pegmatite Keystone, South Dakota
Geology of the Hugo Pegmatite Keystone, South Dakota GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 297-B Geology of the Hugo Pegmatite Keystone, South Dakota By J. J. NORTON, L. R. PAGE, and D. A. BROBST PEGMATITES AND OTHER PRECAMBRIAN ROCKS IN THE SOUTHERN BLACK HILLS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 297-P A detailed structural and petrologic study of a pegmatite containing seven zones and two replacement bodies UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract.. _ ________________________________________ 49 Mineral distribution and paragenesis of the entire Introduction. ______________________________________ 49 pegmatite_ _ ______________________-___---------_ 96 General geology. ___________________________________ 52 Comparison of the zonal sequence with that in other Metamorphic rocks_ ____________________________ 52 pegmatites. ______________________________________ 97 Roy and Monte Carlo pegmatites.- _ __---__-______ 53 Replacement features-______________________________ 100 Structure __________________________________________ 53 Review of the evidence for replacement in pegma Pegmatite units ____________________________________ 53 tites __ _____________________________________ 100 Zone 1 : Albite-quartz-musco vite pegmatite ________ 56 Replacement in the Hugo pegmatite.____-_____-_- 102 -
Geology Club Mineral: Collecting Trip
Geology Club: Mineral Collecting Trip (10 October 2009) Trip Notes by Charles Merguerian STOP 1 – Grossular Garnet Locality, West Redding, Connecticut. [UTM Coordinates: 630.71E / 4575.38N, Bethel quadrangle]. Covering roughly 60 acres of land, this enigmatic massive fine-grained grossularite garnet + diopside rock in West Redding has made many mineral collectors and geologists take notice. Walk up the steep slope east of Simpaug Turnpike to see highly fractured, massive cinnamon-colored grossular garnet rock, part of a 0.6-km wide heart-shaped mass found at the faulted contact between the Stockbridge Marble (OCs) and injected muscovitic schist of the Rowe Schist member (OCr) of the Hartland Formation (Figure 1). According to Rodgers et al. (1985), we are very near Cameron’s Line (red and black line in Figure 1). Figure 1 – Geologic map of the area surrounding Stop 1 showing the Proterozoic gneissic rocks (Yg) and Cambrian Dalton Schist (Cd) to the west, the Stockbridge Marble (OCs), Cameron’s Line (CL in red), the injected schistose rocks of the Rowe Formation (OCr), and an Ordovician granitoid (Og) that may be responsible for this unusual Ca++-enriched skarn deposit. Note the NW-trending high-angle brittle faults that cut the region. (Adapted from Rodgers et al. 1985.) Two knolls at this locality are almost entirely composed of grossularite garnet (var. essonite) and lesser clinopyroxene. Mostly the garnet occurs alone with minor quartz and localized quartz veining has been observed. Chemical analysis of the garnet (SiO2 = 39.10%, CaO = 34.85%, Al2O3 = 19.61%, and total FeO+Fe2O3 = 5.44%), are quite similar to published analyses of grossular garnet, including the phenomenal grossular garnet crystals from Morelos, Mexico. -
Mineral Processing
Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19 -
Lithium in Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles
Office of Industries Working Paper ID-069 July 2020 Global Value Chains: Lithium in Lithium-ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles Gregory M. LaRocca Abstract Lithium is an essential material in the production of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), which power electric vehicles. This paper examines the global value chain (GVC) for lithium as part of a series of working papers that map out the global sources of mining, refining, and value-added for the key LIB materials. Results show that few countries have economically viable resources of the upstream raw materials that supply the lithium GVC. Most lithium-rich ores are exported from Australia to China for processing, while most lithium brine concentrates are exported from Chile to South Korea, Japan, and China for processing. The large inflows of lithium to China support its dominant position in the downstream refining process, which is where the largest share of value-added occurs. Consequently, China is capturing the largest shares of value-added along the lithium GVC, despite lacking in resource endowment. Disclaimer: Office of Industries working papers are the result of the ongoing professional research of USITC staff and solely represent the opinions and professional research of individual authors. These papers do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. International Trade Commission or any of its individual Commissioners. U.S. International Trade Commission Global Value Chains: Lithium in Lithium-ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles Gregory M. LaRocca Office of Industries U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) July 2020 The author is staff with the Office of Industries of the U.S. -
Session 1 Sources and Availability of Materials for Lithium Batteries
Session 1: Sources and Availability of Materials for Lithium Batteries Session 1 Sources and Availability of Materials for Lithium Batteries Adrian Griffin Managing Director, Lithium Australia NL ABSTRACT Lithium, as a feedstock for the battery industry, originates from two primary sources: hard-rock (generally spodumene and petalite), and brines. Brine processing results in the direct production of lithium chemicals, whereas the output from hard-rock production is tradeable mineral concentrates that require downstream processing prior to delivery, as refined chemicals, into the battery market. The processors of the concentrates, the 'converters', are the major constraint in a supply chain blessed with abundant mineral feed. The battery industry must overcome the constraints imposed by the converters, and this can be achieved through the application of the Sileach™ process, which produces lithium chemicals from concentrates direct, without the need for roasting. The cathode chemistries of the most efficient lithium batteries have a common thread – a high dependence on cobalt. Battery manufacturers consume around 40% of the current production of cobalt, a by-product of the nickel and copper industries. This means cobalt is at a tipping point – production will not keep up with demand. In the short term, the solution lies in developing alternative cathode compositions, while in the longer term recycling may be the answer. Lithium Australia NL is researching the application of its Sileach™ process to waste batteries to achieve a high-grade, low-cost source of battery materials and, in so doing, ease the supply constraints on cathode metals. To ensure that the battery industry is sustainable, better utilisation of mineral resources, more efficient processing technology, an active battery reprocessing capacity and less reliance on cobalt as a cathode material are all necessary. -
Helium Adsorption on Lithium Substrates
JLowTempPhys DOI 10.1007/s10909-007-9516-5 Helium Adsorption on Lithium Substrates E. Van Cleve · P. Taborek · J.E. Rutledge Received: 25 July 2007 / Accepted: 13 September 2007 © Springer Science+Business Media 2007 Abstract We have developed a cryogenic pulsed laser deposition (PLD) system to deposit lithium films onto a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) at 4 K. Adsorption isotherms of 4He on lithium were measured in the temperature range between 1.42 K and 2.5 K. The isotherms are qualitatively different from isotherms on strong sub- strates such as gold and weak substrates such as cesium. There is no evidence of the formation of solid-like layers of helium, and the helium coverage is approximately linear in the pressure over a wide range. By measuring the low coverage slope of the isotherms, the binding energy of helium to lithium was found to be approxi- mately −13.6 K. For lithium substrates less than approximately 100 layers thick, the chemical potential at which the superfluid transition was observed was surprisingly sensitive to the details of lithium deposition. Keywords Helium films · Pulsed laser deposition · Superfluidity · Alkali metal 1 Introduction When helium is adsorbed onto a strong heterogenous substrate such as gold, the first 2 or 3 statistical layers are solid-like. The nature of these layers is not yet clear, but the layers are amorphous and do not participate significantly in superflow at high coverages. Superfluidity on strong substrates requires a minimum critical coverage to saturate the solid-like layers, and the superfluid phase which forms at higher cover- ages flows over these layers and does not interact directly with the strong, short range This work was supported by NSF grant DMR 0509685. -
Lithium Data Sheet
98 LITHIUM (Data in metric tons of lithium content unless otherwise noted) Domestic Production and Use: The only lithium production in the United States was from a brine operation in Nevada. Two companies produced a wide range of downstream lithium compounds in the United States from domestic or imported lithium carbonate, lithium chloride, and lithium hydroxide. Domestic production data were withheld to avoid disclosing company proprietary data. Although lithium markets vary by location, global end-use markets are estimated as follows: batteries, 65%; ceramics and glass, 18%; lubricating greases, 5%; polymer production, 3%; continuous casting mold flux powders, 3%; air treatment, 1%; and other uses, 5%. Lithium consumption for batteries has increased significantly in recent years because rechargeable lithium batteries are used extensively in the growing market for portable electronic devices and increasingly are used in electric tools, electric vehicles, and grid storage applications. Lithium minerals were used directly as ore concentrates in ceramics and glass applications. Salient Statistics—United States: 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019e Production W W W W W Imports for consumption 2,750 3,140 3,330 3,420 2,500 Exports 1,790 1,520 1,960 1,660 1,700 Consumption, estimated1 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 Price, annual average, battery-grade lithium carbonate, dollars per metric ton2 6,500 8,650 15,000 17,000 13,000 Employment, mine and mill, number 70 70 70 70 70 Net import reliance3 as a percentage of estimated consumption >25 >50 >50 >50 >25 Recycling: One domestic company has recycled lithium metal and lithium-ion batteries since 1992 at its facility in British Columbia, Canada.