Paragi Beáta a Békefolyamat Sokkal Fontosabb Volt. a Nemzetközi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Paragi Beáta a Békefolyamat Sokkal Fontosabb Volt. a Nemzetközi Paragi Beáta A békefolyamat sokkal fontosabb volt. A nemzetközi segélyezés összefüggései az izraeli-palesztín konfliktusban (1993-2000-2005) 1 Nemzetközi Tanulmányok Intézet Témavezet ő: Dr. Rostoványi Zsolt Egyetemi tanár A bíráló bizottság névsora: © Paragi Beáta 2 NEMZETKÖZI KAPCSOLATOK MULTIDISZCIPLINÁRIS DOKTORI ISKOLA Paragi Beáta A békefolyamat sokkal fontosabb volt. A nemzetközi segélyezés összefüggései az izraeli-palesztín konfliktusban (1993-2000-2005) Ph.D. értekezés Budapest, 2008 3 Tartalomjegyzék Táblázatok és ábrák jegyzéke................................................................................................. 6 Köszönetnyilvánítás ............................................................................................................... 8 Bevezetés................................................................................................................................ 9 1. A probléma meghatározása, koncepcionális keretek ............................................... 10 1.1. A probléma definiálása, illetve a tézisek megfogalmazása...................................... 10 1.2. Megközelítés, módszertan, koncepcionális keretek................................................. 27 1.2.1. Megközelítés: a küls ő segélyezés lehetséges értelmezési keretei.................... 27 1.2.2. Alkalmazott módszertan................................................................................... 33 1.2.3. A nemzetközi segélyezés politikaelméleti össszefüggései .............................. 40 1.2.4. A nemzetközi segélyezés alapfogalmai és hatékonysága ................................ 54 2. Az oslói folyamat gyakorlati keretei, korlátai.......................................................... 64 2.1. A megállapodások természete, bels ő gyengeségei................................................... 65 2.2. Az Izrael és PH közötti gazdasági integráció sajátosságai....................................... 83 2.3. Az oslói folyamat gazdasági, társadalmi velejárói palesztín oldalon ...................... 93 3. A palesztín államalakulás sajátosságai, dilemmái ................................................. 113 3.1. Belpolitikai összefüggések..................................................................................... 114 3.2. Szuverenitás vs. életképesség................................................................................. 124 4. A segélypolitika külpolitikai háttere: Európa és a közel-keleti konfliktus ............ 128 4.1. Európa térségbeli politikája az amerikai külpolitika tükrében............................... 130 4.2. A közel-keleti konfliktus és szerepl ői – percepciók .............................................. 139 4.3. Az EU és tagállamainak oslói folyamatban való érdekeltsége .............................. 148 4.3.1. Európa térségbeli kapcsolatainak jellege ....................................................... 149 4.3.2. Az európai donorok, mint hatalmi-politikai aktorok...................................... 156 4.3.3. Az EU/EK fejlesztéspolitikájának releváns vonatkozásai ............................. 170 5. Politikai intervenció, fejlesztési együttm űködés, humanitárius segítségnyújtás ... 181 5.1. A hivatalos segélyezés f őbb szerepl ői és perspektívái 1993-ban........................... 181 5.2. A nemzetközi (nyugati) segélyezési politika elvi-stratégiai alakulása .................. 186 5.2.1. A nemzetközi közösség feltételezései és feltételei......................................... 187 5.2.2. Politikai-stratégiai összefüggések .................................................................. 190 5.2.3. A helyi koordinációs mechanizmus funkciói................................................. 198 5.2.4. Az EU/EK nemzetközi donorközösségben képviselt pozíciói....................... 201 5.3. Az adatok értelmezésével kapcsolatos problémák, nehézségek ............................ 207 5.4. A Palesztín Hatóság donorpolitikákban való fontossága....................................... 211 5.5. A segélyek funkciói és hatásmechanizmusa .......................................................... 226 5.5.1. Következetesség elvben, következetlenség gyakorlatban (1994-2000)......... 227 5.5.2. Feltételesség, reformok és következmények (2000-2005)............................. 243 Konklúzió: a küls ő támogatás békefolyamatban játszott szerepe...................................... 257 Mellékletek......................................................................................................................... 265 Az oslói folyamat filozófiájának akadémiai háttere....................................................... 265 Fontosabb releváns események (1993-2005) ................................................................. 267 Humán fejl ődési mutatók (UNDP, HDI), 2004.............................................................. 268 A palesztín társadalom fontosabb mutatói (PCBS 2006)............................................... 269 A palesztín gazdaság fontosabb mutatói (1994-2000) ................................................... 270 A palesztín gazdaság fontosabb mutatói (2000-2005) ................................................... 272 4 A palesztín GDP szektoriális megoszlása (1995, 1999, 2000, 2002 - 2005) ................. 273 Egyéb – foglalkoztatottsági, társadalmi – mutatók (PCBS 2006).................................. 274 A palesztín költségvetés tételei (1996-2002) ................................................................. 275 Az OECD DAC államainak ODA/GNI [ODA/GNP] aránya (1970-2005).................... 276 Az OECD DAC (tagállamok) által nyújtott segélyek alakulása, 1990-2006 ................. 277 Közös, hivatalos izraeli-palesztín egyeztet ő fórumok (oslói folyamat) ......................... 278 A donormechanizmus m űködése (2003)........................................................................ 279 A donormechanizmus reformja (2005-2006) ................................................................. 280 A palesztín területeknek juttatott bilaterális ODA (1993-2000; 2000-2005)................. 281 A PH legnagyobb donorai (1993-2003; 2004-2005)...................................................... 282 A segélyek nagyságrendjének alakulása (különféle források szerint)............................ 282 A PH öt legnagyobb donora és részesedésük az összes segélyen belül ......................... 283 A segélyek alakulása 2002-2006.................................................................................... 284 A legnagyobb donorok prioritásai, 2002-2006............................................................... 285 Az OECD DAC donorai által a PNH PNH felé teljesített (D) fejlesztési segélyek (ODA) nagyságrendjének alakulása globális és regionális összehasonlításban, 1993-2000...... 286 Az OECD DAC donorai által a PNH felé teljesített (D) fejlesztési segélyek relatív alakulása összes és közel-keleti segélyeiken (ODA) belül, 1993-1997 ......................... 287 Az OECD DAC donorai által a PNH felé teljesített (D) fejlesztési segélyek relatív alakulása összes és közel-keleti segélyeiken (ODA) belül, 1997-2000 ......................... 288 Az OECD DAC donorai által a PNH felé teljesített (D) fejlesztési segélyek (ODA) alakulása globális és regionális összehasonlításban, 2000-2005.................................... 289 Az OECD DAC donorai által a PNH felé teljesített (D) fejlesztési segélyek relatív alakulása összes és közel-keleti segélyeiken (ODA) belül, 2000-2005 ......................... 290 A palesztín területek (PNH) Közel-Keleten belüli relatív súlya az OECD DAC államainak összes bilaterális, multilaterális segélyén (ODA) belül, 2000-2005............ 291 A PNH legnagyobb donorainak fejlesztéspolitikai preferenciái .................................... 292 Bibliográfia ........................................................................................................................ 293 Könyvek, tanulmányok, cikkek...................................................................................... 293 Dokumentumok .............................................................................................................. 310 Egyéb források ............................................................................................................... 311 Beszélgetések, interjúk (személyes, e-mail)................................................................... 312 Közvéleménykutatási adatok forrásai ............................................................................ 312 5 Táblázatok és ábrák jegyzéke 1. Táblázat - A nemzetközi kapcsolatok iskoláinak fejlesztési segélyekr ől alkotott felfogása ......................................................................................................................... 47 2. Táblázat - Az oslói megállapodásokkal szembeni megnyilvánulások (1994-2005)........ 80 3. Táblázat - A palesztín területek fontosabb gazdasági mutatói (1968-1993).................... 85 4. Táblázat - A palesztín-izraeli gazdasági kapcsolatok alakulása (1990-2005) ................. 92 5. Táblázat - A Nyugati Part és a Gázai-övezet szociális ellátásának megoszlása, 1992 .... 93 6. Táblázat - A Nyugati Part és a Gázai-övezet szociális ellátásának megoszlása, 2005 .... 95 7. Táblázat - A Nyugati Part és a Gáza-övezet infrastrukturális ellátottsága regionális összehasonlításban, 1992-1994....................................................................... 97 8. Táblázat - A palesztín területek fontosabb gazdasági, társadalmi mutatói, 1990-2005 (éves átlag) ...................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Changing Forms of Incitement to Terror and Violence
    THE CHANGING FORMS OF INCITEMENT TO TERROR AND VIOLENCE: TERROR AND TO THE CHANGING FORMS OF INCITEMENT The most neglected yet critical component of international terror is the element of incitement. Incitement is the medium through which the ideology of terror actually materializes into the act of terror itself. But if indeed incitement is so obviously and clearly a central component of terrorism, the question remains: why does the international community in general, and international law in particular, not posit a crime of incitement to terror? Is there no clear dividing line between incitement to terror and the fundamental right to freedom of speech? With such questions in mind, the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs and the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung held an international conference on incitement. This volume presents the insights of the experts who took part, along with a Draft International Convention to Combat Incitement to Terror and Violence that is intended for presentation to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. The Need for a New International Response International a New for Need The THE CHANGING FORMS OF INCITEMENT TO TERROR AND VIOLENCE: The Need for a New International Response Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs המרכז הירושלמי לענייני ציבור ומדינה )ע"ר( THE CHANGING FORMS OF INCITEMENT TO TERROR AND VIOLENCE: The Need for a New International Response Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs המרכז הירושלמי לענייני ציבור ומדינה )ע"ר( This volume is based on a conference on “Incitement to Terror and Violence: New Challenges, New Responses” under the auspices of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs and the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, held on November 8, 2011, at the David Citadel Hotel, Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Economic Development: Israeli Actions in Light of the 1994 Paris Protocol and International Economic Law Vincent El Hayek
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Journal of International Law 2015 Palestinian Economic Development: Israeli Actions in Light of the 1994 Paris Protocol and International Economic Law Vincent El Hayek Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjil Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Hayek, Vincent El, "Palestinian Economic Development: Israeli Actions in Light of the 1994 Paris Protocol and International Economic Law" (2015). Minnesota Journal of International Law. 286. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjil/286 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Journal of International Law collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Palestinian Economic Development: Israeli Actions in Light of the 1994 Paris Protocol and International Economic Law Vincent El Hayek In 1993, Israel and the Palestinian Liberation Organization signed the Oslo Accords,' starting a peace process that was meant to end with a Palestinian State. The Oslo Accords were only the start of numerous agreements, including the 1994 Gaza-Jericho Agreement, which became Annex IV to the Accords, commonly known as the Paris Protocol.2 The Paris Protocol laid out the framework for what was to be the economic relationship between Israel and a Palestinian state. Its writers recognized the importance that stability and growth in the Palestinian economy had for any hope of a lasting peace. 3 As such, they developed a strategy which hinged on four "pillars" for Palestinian economic development: 11] International aid; [2] close Israeli-Palestinian economic relations; [3] foreign and private investment; and [4] access to foreign markets for Palestinian exports.4 When the Paris Protocol was first signed, excitement was high.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel, Palestine, and the Olso Accords
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 23, Issue 1 1999 Article 4 Israel, Palestine, and the Olso Accords JillAllison Weiner∗ ∗ Copyright c 1999 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj Israel, Palestine, and the Olso Accords JillAllison Weiner Abstract This Comment addresses the Middle East peace process, focusing upon the relationship be- tween Israel and Palestine. Part I discusses the background of the land that today comprises the State of Israel and its territories. This Part summarizes the various accords and peace treaties signed by Israel, the Palestinians, and the other surrounding Arab Nations. Part II reviews com- mentary regarding peace in the Middle East by those who believe Israel needs to surrender more land and by those who feel that Palestine already has received too much. Part II examines the conflict over the permanent status negotiations, such as the status of the territories. Part III argues that all the parties need to abide by the conditions and goals set forth in the Oslo Accords before they can realistically begin the permanent status negotiations. Finally, this Comment concludes that in order to achieve peace, both sides will need to compromise, with Israel allowing an inde- pendent Palestinian State and Palestine amending its charter and ending the call for the destruction of Israel, though the circumstances do not bode well for peace in the Middle East. ISRAEL, PALESTINE, AND THE OSLO ACCORDS fillAllison Weiner* INTRODUCTION Israel's' history has always been marked by a juxtaposition between two peoples-the Israelis and the Palestinians 2-each believing that the land is rightfully theirs according to their reli- gion' and history.4 In 1897, Theodore Herzl5 wrote DerJeden- * J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Wye River Memorandum: a Transition to Final Peace Justus R
    Hastings International and Comparative Law Review Volume 24 Article 1 Number 1 Fall 2000 1-1-2000 Wye River Memorandum: A Transition to Final Peace Justus R. Weiner Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_international_comparative_law_review Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Justus R. Weiner, Wye River Memorandum: A Transition to Final Peace, 24 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 1 (2000). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_international_comparative_law_review/vol24/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wye River Memorandum: A Transition to Final Peace? BY JusTus R. WEINER* Table of Contents Introduction ...........................................................................................2 I. Inception of the Wye River Memorandum .................................5 A. The Memorandum's Position in the Peace Process ............. 5 B. The Terms Agreed Upon ........................................................8 1. The Wye River Memorandum and Related Letters from the United States .....................................................8 2. The Intricate "Time Line".............................................. 9
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: the Most Important Events Yasser
    Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: The Most Important Events Yasser Arafat Foundation 1 Early 20th Century - The total population of Palestine is estimated at 600,000, including approximately 36,000 of the Jewish faith, most of whom immigrated to Palestine for purely religious reasons, the remainder Muslims and Christians, all living and praying side by side. 1901 - The Zionist Organization (later called the World Zionist Organization [WZO]) founded during the First Zionist Congress held in Basel Switzerland in 1897, establishes the “Jewish National Fund” for the purpose of purchasing land in Palestine. 1902 - Ottoman Sultan Abdul Hamid II agrees to receives Theodor Herzl, the founder of the Zionist movement and, despite Herzl’s offer to pay off the debt of the Empire, decisively rejects the idea of Zionist settlement in Palestine. - A majority of the delegates at The Fifth Zionist Congress view with favor the British offer to allocate part of the lands of Uganda for the settlement of Jews. However, the offer was rejected the following year. 2 1904 - A wave of Jewish immigrants, mainly from Russia and Poland, begins to arrive in Palestine, settling in agricultural areas. 1909 Jewish immigrants establish the city of “Tel Aviv” on the outskirts of Jaffa. 1914 - The First World War begins. - - The Jewish population in Palestine grows to 59,000, of a total population of 657,000. 1915- 1916 - In correspondence between Sir Henry McMahon, the British High Commissioner in Egypt, and Sharif Hussein of Mecca, wherein Hussein demands the “independence of the Arab States”, specifying the boundaries of the territories within the Ottoman rule at the time, which clearly includes Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in the Wye River Memorandum | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 188 Human Rights in the Wye River Memorandum by Matthew Levitt Nov 4, 1998 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Matthew Levitt Matthew Levitt is the Fromer-Wexler Fellow and director of the Reinhard Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence at The Washington Institute. Brief Analysis n response to last week's Hamas suicide attack on a school bus of Jewish children in Gaza, the Palestinian I Authority (PA) has inaugurated its most comprehensive security crackdown since the aftermath of the wave of suicide bombings in February and March 1996. Shaykh Ahmed Yassin, founder and spiritual leader of Hamas, is under house arrest -- with his phone line cut and his street under twenty-four-hour guard -- and more than one hundred suspected Hamas activists have been arrested. Ironically, the Palestinian security chiefs overseeing the current crackdown are the same officials who just a few days earlier insisted that the security section of the Wye River Memorandum include a curious paragraph calling for the Palestinian police to respect human rights and the rule of law. Background: The human rights paragraph, located in the security chapter of Wye, states the following: Pursuant to Article XI (1) of Annex I of the Interim Agreement, and without derogating from the above, the Palestinian Police will exercise powers and responsibilities to implement this Memorandum with due regard to internationally accepted norms of human rights and the rule of law, and will be guided by the need to protect the public, respect human dignity, and avoid harassment. As noted, the paragraph is reprinted exactly as it appeared in Annex I of the Oslo II accord (1995), except for one deletion -- the 1995 version paired the Palestinian police with the Israeli military as the two institutions needing to respect human rights; Wye refers only to the Palestinians.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel, Palestine and the Icc
    ISRAEL, PALESTINE AND THE ICC ISRAEL, PALESTINE AND THE ICC Daniel Benoliel † & Ronen Perry †† This Article provides a critical assessment of theoretical and practical arguments for judicial state recognition by the International Criminal Court (ICC). It does so both generally and with regard to a highly pertinent contemporary example, namely a judge-made Palestinian state. In the wake of the Israel–Gaza 2008-09 armed conflict and the recently commenced process in the ICC, the Court will soon face a major challenge – one that holds the potential to define its degree of judicial independence and overall legitimacy. It may need to decide whether a Palestinian state exists, for the purposes of the Court itself, and perhaps in general. Apart from the possibility that such a declaration may constitute a controversial intervention in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, it would also set a precedent within public international law concerning judicial state recognition. The Rome Statute of 1998 establishing the ICC created a state-based system, so that the existence of a Palestinian state is a precondition for the present proceedings to continue. Moreover, although the ICC potentially bears the authority to investigate crimes that fall under its subject-matter jurisdiction, regardless of where they were committed, the question remains as to whether and to what extent it has jurisdiction over non-member states, in this case Israel. 1 ISRAEL, PALESTINE AND THE ICC Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Terrorist Conjunction: the United States, the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, and Al-Qa'ida
    The Terrorist Conjunction: The United States, the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, and Al-Qa'ida Alfred G. Gerteiny PRAEGER SECURITY INTERNATIONAL THE TERRORIST CONJUNCTION Praeger Security International Advisory Board Board Cochairs Loch K. Johnson, Regents Professor of Public and International Affairs, School of Public and International Affairs, University of Georgia (U.S.A.) Paul Wilkinson, Professor of International Relations and Chairman of the Advisory Board, Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence, University of St. Andrews (U.K.) Members Eliot A. Cohen, Robert E. Osgood Professor of Strategic Studies and Director, Philip Merrill Center for Strategic Studies, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, The Johns Hopkins University (U.S.A.) Anthony H. Cordesman, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy, Center for Strategic and International Studies (U.S.A.) Ther´ ese` Delpech, Director of Strategic Affairs, Atomic Energy Commission, and Senior Research Fellow, CERI (Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques), Paris (France) Sir Michael Howard, former Chichele Professor of the History of War and Regis Professor of Modern History, Oxford University, and Robert A. Lovett Professor of Military and Naval History, Yale University (U.K.) Lieutenant General Claudia J. Kennedy, USA (Ret.), former Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Department of the Army (U.S.A.) Paul M. Kennedy, J. Richardson Dilworth Professor of History and Director, International Security Studies, Yale University (U.S.A.) Robert J. O’Neill, former Chichele Professor of the History of War, All Souls College, Oxford University (Australia) Shibley Telhami, Anwar Sadat, Chair for Peace and Development, Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland (U.S.A.) Jusuf Wanandi, cofounder and member, Board of Trustees, Centre for Strategic and International Studies (Indonesia) Fareed Zakaria, Editor, Newsweek International (U.S.A.) THE TERRORIST CONJUNCTION The United States, the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, and al-Qa’ida¯ ALFRED G.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Understanding the Struggle for Palestinian Human Rights
    A Guide to Understanding the Struggle for Palestinian Human Rights © Copyright 2010, The Veritas Handbook. 1st Edition: July 2010. Online PDF, Cost: $0.00 Cover Photo: Ahmad Mesleh This document may be reproduced and redistributed, in part, or in full, for educational and non- profit purposes only and cannot be used for fundraising or any monetary purposes. We encourage you to distribute the material and print it, while keeping the environment in mind. Photos by Ahmad Mesleh, Jon Elmer, and Zoriah are copyrighted by the authors and used with permission. Please see www.jonelmer.ca, www.ahmadmesleh.wordpress.com and www.zoriah.com for detailed copyright information and more information on these photographers. Excerpts from Rashid Khalidi’s Palestinian Identity, Ben White’s Israeli Apartheid: A Beginner’s Guide and Norman Finkelstein’s This Time We Went Too Far are also taken with permission of the author and/or publishers and can only be used for the purposes of this handbook. Articles from The Electronic Intifada and PULSE Media have been used with written permission. We claim no rights to the images included or content that has been cited from other online resources. Contact: [email protected] Web: www.veritashandbook.blogspot.com T h e V E R I T A S H a n d b o o k 2 A Guide to Understanding the Struggle for Palestinian Human Rights To make this handbook possible, we would like to thank 1. The Hasbara Handbook and the Hasbara Fellowships 2. The Israel Project’s Global Language Dictionary Both of which served as great inspirations, convincing us of the necessity of this handbook in our plight to establish truth and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Camp David's Shadow
    Camp David’s Shadow: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinian Question, 1977-1993 Seth Anziska Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2015 © 2015 Seth Anziska All rights reserved ABSTRACT Camp David’s Shadow: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinian Question, 1977-1993 Seth Anziska This dissertation examines the emergence of the 1978 Camp David Accords and the consequences for Israel, the Palestinians, and the wider Middle East. Utilizing archival sources and oral history interviews from across Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, the United States, and the United Kingdom, Camp David’s Shadow recasts the early history of the peace process. It explains how a comprehensive settlement to the Arab-Israeli conflict with provisions for a resolution of the Palestinian question gave way to the facilitation of bilateral peace between Egypt and Israel. As recently declassified sources reveal, the completion of the Camp David Accords—via intensive American efforts— actually enabled Israeli expansion across the Green Line, undermining the possibility of Palestinian sovereignty in the occupied territories. By examining how both the concept and diplomatic practice of autonomy were utilized to address the Palestinian question, and the implications of the subsequent Israeli and U.S. military intervention in Lebanon, the dissertation explains how and why the Camp David process and its aftermath adversely shaped the prospects of a negotiated settlement between Israelis and Palestinians in the 1990s. In linking the developments of the late 1970s and 1980s with the Madrid Conference and Oslo Accords in the decade that followed, the dissertation charts the role played by American, Middle Eastern, international, and domestic actors in curtailing the possibility of Palestinian self-determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Greg Burris, the Palestinian Idea: Film, Media, and the Radical Imagination, Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 2019)
    CONTINENTAL THOUGHT & THEORY: A JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM Book Review- Rawia Inaim Volume 3 | Issue 2: Thinking Sin 333-341 | ISSN: 2463-333X Book Review Palestine & Media Studies A review of Greg Burris, The Palestinian Idea: Film, Media, and the Radical Imagination, Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 2019). Review by Rawia Inaim While passing through the Allenby border crossing on one of my trips to Palestine, the soldier who was checking our papers looked at my sister who was five years old at the time, and said, in Hebrew, “you are very pretty.” I did not know how to read the soldier’s words and their implications on the hierarchical differences present in that moment. However, a reading that sees this interaction as an instance of the agent’s rejection of her state’s unjust reality is a reading stuck in the Imaginary realm in the Lacanian sense. In other words, in that instance, the agent was still enforcing the occupation, and we were still being occupied, the only change that might have occurred is that the agent humanized herself.1 I was reminded of this interaction after reading Greg Burris’s The Palestinian Idea. In the preface to his book, Burris recounts an anecdote describing Jaffa/ Yafa beach, where he spotted in a short period of time “an apparently secular couple taking a dog for a walk, some Muslim children flying kites, and an Orthodox Jewish family enjoying a picnic. I heard both Hebrew and Arabic, as well as the sound of bells ringing from a nearby church” (Burris 2019, xi).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Annex A
    ICC-01/18-12-AnxA 22-01-2020 1/54 RH PT PUBLIC ANNEX A 1 ICC-01/18-12-AnxA 22-01-2020 2/54 RH PT LIST OF AUTHORITIES AND GLOSSARY I. FILINGS IN THE SITUATION IN THE STATE OF PALESTINE ICC-01/18 Short-title Reference Outreach Decision ICC-01/18-2 Decision on Information and Outreach for the Victims of the Situation, 13 July 2018 Palestine PTCI Decision ICC-01/18-1, Decision assigning the situation in the State of Palestine to Pre-Trial Chamber I, 24 May 2018 Registry Fourth Report ICC-01/18-6-Red, Public redacted version of “Registry’s Fourth Report on Information and Outreach Activities Concerning Victims and Affected Communities in the Situation”, 9 August 2019, ICC-01/18-6-Conf, 9 August 2019 Registry Initial Report ICC-01/18-3-Red, Public redacted version of “Registry’s Initial Report on Information and Outreach Activities Concerning Victims and Affected Communities in the Situation”, 12 November 2018, ICC-01/18-3-Conf, 20 November 2018 Registry Second Report ICC-01/18-4-Red, Registry’s Second Report on Information and Outreach Activities Concerning Victims and Affected Communities in the Situation, 12 February 2019, ICC-01/18-4-Conf, 13 February 2019 Registry Third Report ICC-01/18-5-Red, Public redacted version of “Registry’s Third Report on Information and Outreach Activities Concerning Victims and Affected Communities in the Situation”, 13 May 2019, ICC-01/18-5-Conf, 13 May 2019 2 ICC-01/18-12-AnxA 22-01-2020 3/54 RH PT II.
    [Show full text]