Spencer and Gillen's Use of Photography in the Native Tribes Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spencer and Gillen's Use of Photography in the Native Tribes Of Visual knowledge: Spencer and Gillen’s use of photography in The native tribes of Central Australia I have printed a set of the Echunpa [perentie] pictures Nicolas Peterson for Sambo and have had a neat shallow tin case made Australian National University to hold them and they are to be taken and deposited with the Churinga in the Ertnatulinga [storehouse cave] Abstract: The native tribes of Central Australia, shortly. Sam was delighted and so was your Okilya published in 1899, was by far and away the best pho- [elder brother], the King. (Gillen in Mulvaney et al. tographically illustrated ethnography up to that time. 1997:157) It has been suggested that Spencer and Gillen relied on Gillen provides no further information on this fas- photography because of the practical difficulty they had in cinating event and so one is left to speculate about communicating with the Arrernte and in understanding the surrounding circumstances and motivations. what was going on. Here it is argued that the involvement Although it is unknown whether Sambo requested with photography arose out of the intersection of the limits the ceremonial photographs spontaneously or took that face verbal communication when in the presence up an offer of the prints, it would seem likely that it of complex performance, and the significance of visual was his idea to place the photographs in the churinga information within the emerging natural-science fieldwork storehouse.1 Gillen and Spencer took a great many orientation. However, it seems that Spencer and Gillen’s ceremonial photographs, and clearly showed them intellectual understandings of Arrernte life and culture to the Aboriginal men from time to time (below), but were challenged by the photographs, leading them to deny there is no evidence that this lodging of prints in the aspects of the evidence the photographs provided. storehouses was a common practice. It might also be reasonably assumed that it was Gillen’s idea to make a tin box for the photographs since it was integral to both his and Spencer’s work that the photographs were of great archival value.2 Speculation also has to fill the gap about motivation. Gillen is clear that not forboth Sambo and his father, the King, were pleased about the whole idea.3 The acceptance of the box and the lodging of the images in the storehouse are clear evidence that the photographs were highly valued and one can only assume that that was because they were seen to be related directly to the events/people that they depicted. Because the photographs printed for Sambo recorded restricted information in an entirely com- prehensible form, they had to be restricted in the same way as the events and objects shown in them. This rational view is one that is shared by many Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal persons to the present (e.g. Kimber 1998:50–1).4 They are not concerned reproductionabout taking the simulacra for the real but recognise, as WT Mitchell (1994:284) has said, that one conno- tation of the photograph is that it is pure denotation 1 Australian Aboriginal Studies 2006/1 Spencer and Gillen's use of photography—Peterson and that is simply what it means to recognise a photo- an accomplished draughtsman and amateur sketcher graph as a photograph. But what about Spencer and and even led him to attend art school for a while Gillen: what did photography mean to them? when in Manchester (Mulvaney & Calaby 1985:28). The native tribes of Central Australia (1899, herein- He apparently used visual material in both his uni- after The native tribes) is a lavishly illustrated work, versity and public lectures to good effect (1985:28) and and it is clear both from the volume of Gillen’s letters illustrated many of his publications with his own zoo- to Spencer (Mulvaney et al. 1997), where photogra- logical drawings (1985:29). In 1894 he joined the Horn phy is by far the biggest subject entry in the index Expedition to Central Australia, not just as the expedi- other than for the key persons, and from Mulvaney tion biologist but also as the photographer (1985:118), and Calaby’s (1985) biography of Spencer that it was and in editing the expedition report not only wrote a powerful interest. Why was this? At least two views half the text himself but was the source of most of the have been expressed. Alison Griffiths (1997:29) has photographs, and supplied 23 line illustrations and suggested that the reason for the emphasis on pho- eight pages of colour drawings (1985:117). tography, particularly of the Engwura ceremony, was From Gillen’s correspondence it is clear that the in response to the practical difficulties they had in two men constantly exchanged prints of photographs communicating with the Arrernte and in understand- they had taken. As early as September 1894, Gillen ing what was going on. She specifically refers to the wrote (Mulvaney et al. 1997:52):6 debate on the extent to which Gillen had command I am sending you a few Prints this mail, most of which of the Arrernte language and the over-reliance on you and I developed…Have not yet had time to try young Aboriginal men as translators (Mulvaney & silver printing but hope to have some results to send Calaby 1985:174). Others have seen the ethnographic you next mail. Have taken a number of Corroboree emphasis on photography in this period as part of the pictures since you left and shall get some more in a colonial gaze that, in the case of Aboriginal peoples, few days. If I am successful in printing you shall have was dedicated to demonstrating their place in the a copy of anything I consider sufficiently interesting. evolutionary hierarchy (e.g. Maxwell 1999:142; Willis If there is any picture that you would specially like to 1988:205). have you can let me know. In this paper I argue that these, and other views (e.g. Wolfe 1999) on Spencer and Gillen’s involvement In November 1894 he sent Spencer 34 plates, that with photography, are limiting half-truths that fail to is negatives, which he described as ‘all the best I have engage photography on its own terms and are anach- on hand’ (Mulvaney et al. 1997:58), and later wrote to ronistic in their understanding of Spencer and Gillen, Spencer: ‘Make whatever use you like of the plates and indeed of other ethnographers of the period.5 and return them thro Winnecke7 when you have finished with them’ (Mulvaney et al. 1997:61). He also allowed Stirling to use his photographs, as selected by Involvement with photography not forSpencer (Mulvaney et al. 1997:81). In return, Spencer sent copies of his photographs Spencer and Gillen were both interested in photog- to Gillen (Mulvaney et al. 1997:67, also 70, 71, 124, raphy, quite independently of their collaboration. 151, 188, 258).8 Gillen was much struck by the time Mulvaney and Calaby (1985:165) recorded that Gillen Spencer put into printing and toning the photographs was already a keen photographer before meeting and commented that his Glen of Palms picture was Spencer but that, following their meeting, he increased ‘the most beautiful photograph I have ever seen’ the number of ethnographic subjects and paid greater (Mulvaney et al. 1997:124). This makes it clear, as attention to the technical aspects of camera use and Mulvaney comments, that precise attribution of par- developing. The level of commitment is suggested ticular images to one or other of the men has to be by the fact that, in April 1896, Gillen had half a ton of done with care (Mulvaney et al. 1997:239). Indeed, in photographic materials arriving in Alice Springs by October 1895 Gillen wrote to Spencer (1997:82, also camel (Mulvaney et al. 1997:114). 239) saying: Spencer himself had a commitment to photogra- phy before he came to Australia, having taken photo- The Negatives in your possession are not to be used...[by graphs during a holidayreproduction in the Alps in 1884 (Mulvaney Stirling for making lantern slides] until after publica- & Calaby 1985:50). His interest in photography went tion...Of course if you want slides for yourself take them along with a strong visual imagination that made him by all means, I look upon these negatives as our joint Australian Aboriginal Studies 2006/1 13 Spencer and Gillen's use of photography—Peterson property—You can tell Stirling, if you like, that we are joint owners, you possess your interest by right virtue, or in consideration, of having supplied me with an instantaneous lens and shutter. By comparing published images with unpub- lished images and original negatives, and drawing on old and new archival sources, Philip Jones (2005) has gone some considerable way to disentangling the work of these men, and he thinks that more can be done; he demonstrates that the pictorial contribution to The native tribes was about 50-50. For the purposes of this paper, however, unless otherwise specified, the attitudes of Spencer and Gillen to photography will be taken to be similar and no attempt will be made to distinguish between them.9 Use of the photographs Two broad public uses were made of the photo- graphs taken up to the time of the publication of the 1899 volume. They were used in publications such as newspapers and articles and some of them were made into lantern slides. It was Spencer who made the greater use of lantern slides for lectures, giving no less than 60 public lectures with them from the time of the Horn Expedition onwards (Mulvaney & Calaby 1985:181).
Recommended publications
  • ON TAUNGURUNG LAND SHARING HISTORY and CULTURE Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Inc
    ON TAUNGURUNG LAND SHARING HISTORY AND CULTURE Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Inc. is a part of the Australian Centre for Indigenous History, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University, and gratefully acknowledges the support of the School of History and the National Centre for Indigenous Studies, The Australian National University. Aboriginal History Inc. is administered by an Editorial Board which is responsible for all unsigned material. Views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily shared by Board members. Contacting Aboriginal History All correspondence should be addressed to the Editors, Aboriginal History Inc., ACIH, School of History, RSSS, 9 Fellows Road (Coombs Building), The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, 2601, or [email protected]. WARNING: Readers are notified that this publication may contain names or images of deceased persons. ON TAUNGURUNG LAND SHARING HISTORY AND CULTURE UNCLE ROY PATTERSON AND JENNIFER JONES Published by ANU Press and Aboriginal History Inc. The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760464066 ISBN (online): 9781760464073 WorldCat (print): 1224453432 WorldCat (online): 1224452874 DOI: 10.22459/OTL.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press Cover photograph: Patterson family photograph, circa 1904 This edition © 2020 ANU Press and Aboriginal History Inc. Contents Acknowledgements ....................................... vii Note on terminology ......................................ix Preface .................................................xi Introduction: Meeting and working with Uncle Roy ..............1 Part 1: Sharing Taungurung history 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Corroboree Moderne
    Corrected draft May 2004 CORROBOREE MODERNE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dressed in a brown wool bodystocking specially made by Jantzen and brown face paint, an American dancer, Beth Dean played the young boy initiate in the ballet CORROBOREE at a Gala performance before Queen Elizabeth 11 and Prince Phillip on Feb 4 1954 . “On stage she seems to exude some of the primitive passion of the savage whose rites she presents” (1a) “If appropriations do have a general character, it is surely that of unstable duality. In some proportion, they always combine taking and acknowledgment, appropriation and homage, a critique of colonial exclusions, and collusion in imbalanced exchange. What the problem demands is therefore not an endorsement or rejection of primitivism in principle, but an exploration of how particular works were motivated and assessed.” (1) CORROBOREE "announced its modernity as loudly as its Australian origins…all around the world" (2) 1: (BE ABORIGINAL !) (3) - DANCE A CORROBOREE! The 1950s in the Northern Territory represents simultaneously the high point of corroboree and its vanishing point. At the very moment one of the most significant cultural exchanges of the decade was registered in Australian Society at large, the term corroboree became increasingly so associated with kitsch and the inauthentic it was erased as a useful descriptor, only to be reclaimed almost fifty years later. Corroboree became the bastard notion par excellence imbued with “in- authenticity.” It was such a popularly known term, that it stood as a generic brand for anything dinky-di Australian. (4) Corroboree came to be read as code for tourist trash culture corrupted by white man influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Indigenous/Aboriginal Relations in Australian Society
    2. Keeping Our Distance: Non-Indigenous/Aboriginal relations in Australian society Maggie Walter In February 2008, then Prime Minister Kevin Rudd made a national apology to members of the Stolen Generations. For Indigenous1 and non-Indigenous Australians alike this was a significant political and social moment. The intense media and public interest in, and scrutiny of, the apology demonstrate that the relationship between the original Australians and those who have arrived since colonisation remains salient, if not central, to who Australians are what Australians and Australia is in the twenty-first century. The terrain of this relationship is key to Australia’s self-concept, its identity as a nation and that of its peoples, old and new. Yet these relations are also highly contested. The image of Australia reflected here is a two-sided visage. One face—as manifested in the apology, the elevating of Professor Mick Dodson to 2009 Australian of the Year and the groundswell of public action in the March for Reconciliation in 2000—is openly encouraging of reconciliation and acknowledging of a historical legacy of entrenched marginalisation and poverty. The other face forestalls the prospect of formal rapprochement, casting as undeserved and unearned attempts at social, economic or political equity—a position manifested by the now long-stalled reconciliation process and the commonness of publicly expressed negative sentiment towards Indigenous peoples and culture (see, for example, Andrew Bolt’s 2008 blog in relation to the new Indigenous representative body). This distinctively Australian, but contradictory, picture suggests a country and a national identity ill at ease with the place of Indigeneity in its consciousness, one in which Indigeneity remains unreconciled with everyday concepts of Australian society and Australian identity.
    [Show full text]
  • German Lutheran Missionaries and the Linguistic Description of Central Australian Languages 1890-1910
    German Lutheran Missionaries and the linguistic description of Central Australian languages 1890-1910 David Campbell Moore B.A. (Hons.), M.A. This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The University of Western Australia School of Social Sciences Linguistics 2019 ii Thesis Declaration I, David Campbell Moore, certify that: This thesis has been substantially accomplished during enrolment in this degree. This thesis does not contain material which has been submitted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name, in any university or other tertiary institution. In the future, no part of this thesis will be used in a submission in my name, for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of The University of Western Australia and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint-award of this degree. This thesis does not contain any material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text and, where relevant, in the Authorship Declaration that follows. This thesis does not violate or infringe any copyright, trademark, patent, or other rights whatsoever of any person. This thesis contains published work and/or work prepared for publication, some of which has been co-authored. Signature: 15th March 2019 iii Abstract This thesis establishes a basis for the scholarly interpretation and evaluation of early missionary descriptions of Aranda language by relating it to the missionaries’ training, to their goals, and to the theoretical and broader intellectual context of contemporary Germany and Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boomerang Effect. the Aboriginal Arts of Australia 19 May - 7 January 2018 Preview 18 May 2017 at 6Pm
    MEG Musée d’ethnographie de Genève Press 4 may 2017 The Boomerang Effect. The Aboriginal Arts of Australia 19 May - 7 January 2018 Preview 18 May 2017 at 6pm White walls, neon writing, clean lines: the MEG’s new exhibition «The Boomerang Effect. The Aboriginal Arts of Australia» welcomes its visitors in a space evocative of a contemporary art gallery. Here the MEG unveils one of its finest collections and reveals the wealth of indigenous Australia's cultural heritage. Visiting this exhibition, we understand how attempts to suppress Aboriginal culture since the 18th century have ended up having the opposite of their desired effect. When James Cook landed in Australia, in 1770, he declared the country to be «no one’s land» (terra nullius), as he recognized no state authority there. This justified the island's colonization and the limitless spoliation of its inhabitants, a medley of peoples who had lived there for 60,000 years, societies which up until today have maintained a visible and invisible link with the land through a vision of the world known as the Dreaming or Dreamtime. These mythological tales recount the creation of the universe as well as the balanced and harmonious relation between all the beings inhabiting it. It is told that, in ancestral times, the Djan’kawu sisters peopled the land by naming the beings and places and then lying down near the roots of a pandanus tree to give birth to sacred objects. It is related that the Dätiwuy clan and its land was made by a shark called Mäna.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Researchers and Coranderrk
    3 Researchers and Coranderrk Coranderrk was an important focus of research for anthropologists, archaeologists, naturalists, historians and others with an interest in Australian Aboriginal people. Lydon (2005: 170) describes researchers treating Coranderrk as ‘a kind of ethno- logical archive’. Cawte (1986: 36) has argued that there was a strand of colonial thought – which may be characterised as imperialist, self-congratulatory, and social Darwinist – that regarded Australia as an ‘evolutionary museum in which the primi- tive and civilised races could be studied side by side – at least while the remnants of the former survived’. This chapter considers contributions from six researchers – E.H. Giglioli, H.N. Moseley, C.J.D. Charnay, Rev. J. Mathew, L.W.G. Büchner, and Professor F.R. von Luschan – and a 1921 comment from a primary school teacher, named J.M. Provan, who was concerned about the impact the proposed closure of Coranderrk would have on the ability to conduct research into Aboriginal people. Ethel Shaw (1949: 29–30) has discussed the interaction of Aboriginal residents and researchers, explaining the need for a nuanced understanding of the research setting: The Aborigine does not tell everything; he has learnt to keep silent on some aspects of his life. There is not a tribe in Australia which does not know about the whites and their ideas on certain subjects. News passes quickly from one tribe to another, and they are quick to mislead the inquirer if it suits their purpose. Mr. Howitt, Mr. Matthews, and others, who made a study of the Aborigines, often visited Coranderrk, and were given much assistance by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Spencer Box 1 a Horn
    Pitt Rivers Museum ms collections Spencer papers Box 1 A Horn correspondence Horn Letter 1 [The Adelaide Club] 17 Ap/ 94 Dear Mr. Spencer I am gradually getting things focussed here and think we can get a start on the 3d May [1] re photography I am having a small dark tent made one that can be suspended from the branch of a tree like a huge extinguisher about 4 ft in diameter I am going to take a 1/2 plate Camera with rapid rectilinear lens, and glass plates. You need not bring any rapid plates for your whole plate Camera as in the bright light up there one can get splendid instantaneous results with the Ordinary plate. Please make your Collecting plant as light as is consistent with efficiency as everything has to be carried on camels. Have you ever tried the “Tondeur” developer it is splendid for travelling as it is a one mixture solution and I find gives good results when used even a dozen times, it is a mixture of Hydrogen “Ersine” & can be had at Baker & Rouse’s I told Stirling [2] to write you to engage Keartland [3] Believe me Sincerely yrs WA Horn [4] Horn Letter 2 [The Adelaide Club] 9 June / 94 My dear Spencer, The photos of Ayers Chambers Pillar turned out fairly but a little light fogged & over exposed I got a very good one of a Tempe Downs blackfellow in the act of throwing a spear and another throwing a boomerang. if Gillen [5] has any really good [sic] you might try and get the negatives – When you are turning through the Gibber country get Harry [6] to shew you the hoards made by the ants they really seem to have moved stones by a pound in weight in order to get a clear track— I had a very rough trip by the mail it is really something to remember especially over the Gibbers and the dust was awful I hope you will be able to get Ayers rock as it would be a great addition to the book Sincerely thine [?] W A Horn Horn Letter 3 New University Club St James St.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Strategy 2008
    Cultural Heritage Strategy 2008 – 2011 Preserving and promoting our cultural heritage Before unveiling the plaque From MMBW to at the offi cial opening of the Upper Yarra Dam, the Governor Melbourne Water acknowledged the motto of the Metropolitan Board ‘Public health is my reward’ and added… “I think you will agree that our Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works has never let us down in the past. It certainly has not let us A motto is a phrase describing the motivation or intention of an organisation. The crest of the down today and I know it will MMBW bears the motto, ‘salas mea publica merces’ not let us down in the future.” (‘public health is my reward’). 1891 Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works (MMBW) was established with a charter to build and maintain an underground sewerage system and operate Melbourne’s water supply. 1991 MMBW merged with the Mornington Peninsula District Water Board, Dandenong Valley and Western Port Authorities, Dandenong- Springvale Water Board, Pakenham Water Board, Lang Lang Water Board and Emerald Water Board to form Melbourne Water. At this time, Melbourne Water has three operational regions – Maribyrnong, Yarra and South East. 1995 The Victorian Government split Melbourne’s water industry into three retail water businesses (City West Water, Yarra Valley Water and South East Water). Melbourne Water was established as the wholesale water business and Melbourne Parks and Waterways (the predecessor to Parks Victoria) was set up to manage parks. Melbourne Water retains responsibility for the collection, storage and wholesaling of water and for the treatment and disposal of sewage, as well as responsibility for regional drainage and waterways within the Melbourne Water operational boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the 2018 Program
    sydneylivingmuseums.com.au/enewsSign up to our free monthly eNews STAY IN TOUCH PROGRAM A E M Welcome to country by Art workshops House tours Leanne Watson and 11am–3pm 11.30am, 12.30pm, Rhiannon Wright, and Join Darug artist Leanne 1.30pm & 2.30pm flag-raising ceremony Watson to create a Register for a 30-minute 10.10am–10.30am message stone. tour of Rouse Hill Smoking ceremony by House from a woman’s Nulungu Dreaming F perspective. 10.30am–10.40am Gumaroy Newman 12pm–1pm N B Hear acclaimed singer and Culture talks Nulungu Dreaming poet Gumaroy Newman. 12.15pm, 1.15pm & 2.15pm corroboree Join a Muru Mittigar 10.40am–11.30am G Cultural Educator at the Celebrate Aboriginal culture Darug language classes Darug display in the through dance and song. in the schoolhouse Rouse Hill Visitor Centre. 11.30am & 1.30pm C O Learn to say hello in Darug NAIDOC BECAUSE OF HER, WE CAN! Boomerang throwing in our 1888 schoolhouse. Weaving workshop with Muru Mittigar 12pm–3pm 10.45am–12.30pm H Learn traditional Sunday 15 July & 1pm–3pm Boomerang painting weaving techniques from Throw a boomerang All day Nulungu Dreaming. and learn more about Drop in and paint your this ancient tool. own boomerang. FOOD & DRINK We acknowledge the First D K Nations Peoples, the Darug I & J & P Get Wild native animal Market stalls display and talks All day Enjoy a BBQ cook-up from peoples, the traditional 11am–2pm Mad Mob, tea and coffee Stalls by Aunty Edna, Watson. Leanne by custodians of the land, and from Darcy St Project and Muru Mittigar nursery, traditional Aboriginal foods pay respect to the Elders, AIME, Gillawarra Arts, at Muru Mittigar cafe.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of J. G. Macdonald on an Expedition from Port Denison to The
    This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project to make the world's books discoverable online. It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the publisher to a library and finally to you. Usage guidelines Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. We also ask that you: + Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for personal, non-commercial purposes. + Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnographic Film-Making in Australia: the First Seventy Years
    ETHNOGRAPHIC FILM-MAKING IN AUSTRALIA THE FIRST SEVENTY YEARS (1898-1968) Ian Dunlop Ethnographic film-making is almost as old as cinema itself.1 In 187 7 Edison, in America, perfected his phonograph, the world’s first machine for recording sound — on fragile wax cylinders. He then started experimenting with ways of producing moving pictures. Others in England and France were also experimenting at the same time. Amongst these were the Lumiere brothers of Paris. In 1895 they perfected a projection machine and gave the world’s first public screening. The cinema was born. The same year Felix-Louis Renault filmed a Wolof woman from west Africa making pots at the Exposition Ethnographique de l’Afrique Occidentale in Paris.2 Three years later ethnographic film was being shot in the Torres Strait Islands just north of mainland Australia. This was in 1898 when Alfred Cort Haddon, an English zoologist and anthro­ pologist, mounted his Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to the Torres Strait. His recording equipment included a wax cylinder sound recorder and a Lumiere camera. The technical genius of the expedition, and the man who apparently used the camera, was Anthony Wilkin.3 It is not known how much film he shot; unfortunately only about four minutes of it still exists. It is the first known ethnographic film to be shot in the field anywhere in the world. It is of course black and white, shot on one of the world’s first cameras, with a handle you had to turn to make the film go rather shakily around. The fragment we have shows several rather posed shots of men dancing and another of men attempting to make fire by friction.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Aboriginal Verse 179 Viii Black Words White Page
    Australia’s Fourth World Literature i BLACK WORDS WHITE PAGE ABORIGINAL LITERATURE 1929–1988 Australia’s Fourth World Literature iii BLACK WORDS WHITE PAGE ABORIGINAL LITERATURE 1929–1988 Adam Shoemaker THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E PRESS iv Black Words White Page E PRESS Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] Web: http://epress.anu.edu.au Previously published by University of Queensland Press Box 42, St Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Black Words White Page Shoemaker, Adam, 1957- . Black words white page: Aboriginal literature 1929–1988. New ed. Bibliography. Includes index. ISBN 0 9751229 5 9 ISBN 0 9751229 6 7 (Online) 1. Australian literature – Aboriginal authors – History and criticism. 2. Australian literature – 20th century – History and criticism. I. Title. A820.989915 All rights reserved. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organization. All electronic versions prepared by UIN, Melbourne Cover design by Brendon McKinley with an illustration by William Sandy, Emu Dreaming at Kanpi, 1989, acrylic on canvas, 122 x 117 cm. The Australian National University Art Collection First edition © 1989 Adam Shoemaker Second edition © 1992 Adam Shoemaker This edition © 2004 Adam Shoemaker Australia’s Fourth World Literature v To Johanna Dykgraaf, for her time and care
    [Show full text]