Alkire-Qizilbash-Comim-Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alkire-Qizilbash-Comim-Introduction CA:v18RllJGE UNIV~RSLTY I'RESS Contents Cambridge, Ncw York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo, Delhi Cambridge UniversIty Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in rhe United Slates o[ America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on rhis tirle: www.cambridge.org/9780521862875 List of figures page viii © Cambridge University Press 2008 List oftables ix This publication is in copyrighr. Subject to statutory exception List ofcontributors XII and to the provisions of relevanr collective licensing agreements, List ofacronyms XIV no reptoduction of any part may take place without the writTen permission of Cambridge University Press. Acknowledgements XVI First published 2008 Introduction Sabina Alkire, Mozaffar Qizilbash and Flavio C0111im 1 Printed in rhe United Kingdom at rhe University Press, Cambridgc Using the capability approach: prospective and evaluative A calalogue record (or this p'.JbfiCl11ion is available (rom the British LibraI')' analyses ISBN 978-0-521·86287-5 hardback Sabina Alkire 26 Cambridge University Press has no responsibiliry [or Part I Concepts 51 rhe persistence or accuracy of URLs for eXlcrnal or third-parry internet websites referred to in chis book, 2 Amartya Sen's capability view: insightful sketch or and does not guarantee thar any conteJlt on such websires is, or will remain, accurare or appropriare. distorted picture? Mozaf(ar Qizilbash 53 3 Sen's capability approach and feminist concerns Ingl-id Robeyns 82 4 Beyond individual freedom and agency: structures of living together in the capability approach Severine Deneutin 105 5 Does identity matter? On the relevance of idenrity and interaction for capabilities Miriam Teschl and Laurent Derobert 125 6 Measuring capa bilities Flavia Comim 157 Introduction SABINA ALKIRE, MOZAFFAR QIZILBASH AND FLAVIO COMIM Amartya Sen's capability approach has generated remarkable interest in recent years. This volume brings together a selection of papers initially presented at an international conference on the capability approach (CA) held at St Edmund's College, Cambridge in 200!. This conference marked an important turning point in research on the capability approach. It brought together many young scholars who were interested in the approach as well as others who had been working on it for some time. The conference was initially motivated by issues relating to the usefulness of the approach in the particular con­ texts of poverty and injustice. However, conference papers covered a wide range of topics relating to concepts, measurement and other applications. In this volume, the papers are categorised in terms of these broad and overlapping areas. In 2002 a follow-up conference explored Martha Nussbaum's version of the approach, and annual conferences have been held in subsequent years.1 Numerous initiatives ha ve since emerged, including the Human Development and Capa bility Association (www.hd-ca.org). In part as a result of these initiatives, but also quite independently of them, a large literature on the capability approach has emerged. Amartya Sen's 1980 Tanner lecture, 'Equality of What?', set out a broad agenda for debate and further research. While the approach has been extensively discussed, Sabina Alkire suggests in Chapter 1 that work in this area is still at a relatively early stage. The drawing on the cover of this volume - a version ofJean-Fran<;:ois Millet's 'Les Premiers Pas de l'Enfance' ('The First Steps of Childhood') -shows a child taking its first tenra tl ve steps, supported by her mother. Only time will tell I Nussbaum 1988, Nussbaum 1990,Nussbaum 1992,Nussbaum 1993, Nussbaul1l and Sen 1993, Nussbaum 1995, Nussbaum 1995, Nussbaum, Glover and World Institute for Development Economics Research 1995, Nussbaum 1998, Nussbaum 1998, Nussbaum 2000, Nussbaum 2000, Nussbaum 2001, Nussbaum 2002, Nussbaum 2003, Nussbaum 2005, Nussbaum 2006. 1 2 The Capability Approach Int.roduction 3 whether this image provides an appropriate mecaphor for this early wich analyses which exclusively use informacion on resources, or phase of work on the capability approach. Parr of the value of bringing income, or 'ucility' (when chis is underscood as happiness or desire together a set of papers in a volume of this sort is chac chese papers sacisfaction). The capabiliry approach rhus broadens the informational allow us co assess how far the approach has gone and co define ­ basis used in normacive evaluations. however centacively - pocencial direccions for work on the approach. To illustrare some of these ideas, consider the qualiry of life of the The volume brings together a diverse set of voices, each of which painrer Vincent Van Gogh, in the wimer of 1889. At that time Van engages wich the approach in ics discinct manner. However, we empha­ Gogh paimed an ineerpretation of Millet'S 'The First Steps of sise that many of che chapters engage cricically with differenr aspecrs of Childhood,.2 It is cerrainly true that Van Gogh had little income and che approach, freely questioning and wrestling with ir. Indeed, such chac he was heavily dependent on his brocher for financial suppOrt. cricical engagemem is a Common theme of chis volume. We hope co However, if we considered his position only as regards income or bring ouc the flavour and nature of chis engagement in whac follows resources we would have a very limiced underscanding of the quality through reference co relevant chapcers in this introducrion. of his life. In the months when he was working on chis paiming - as well as At this scage, it is noc emirely foreseeable which direccions will be ocher paintings based on Millet's work - he was extremely unwell and pursued in furure work on the capability approach and how fruitful had recurrene fits. To chis degree, he was clearly deprived in terms chey will cum out co be. If we return co che Millec crayon drawing, of Sen's funccioning 'being in good health'. In addicion, rhese paintings part of what engages our attenrion is the unprediccabilicy of che child's were creared in the asylum of Saine-Remy de Provence where he did nor first steps and the hope - and anxiecy - chat unprediccability generaces. have people who could sit for porn·aits. As a consequence, his brother The sceps of a child are powered by its unique curiosiry, cemperamem Theo sent him some black and whire reproductions of works by Millet and circumstances. Similar unprediccability is evidem in che emerging and Eugene Delacroix, which he worked from. Van Gogh's choice of licerarure on the capability approach. It is parr of whac makes this 'The First Steps of Childhood' as a subject ref1ecced the limited oppor­ licerature both intriguing and excicing. We hope that chis volume will [Unicies or capability he had. His limited opportunicies involved a form convey some of chat excicement. of disadvaneage which may noc be adequacely capcured through an analysis which merely checked his level of 'utility' (in terms of happi­ ness or desire satisfaccion), pardy because he may have learned to Concepts adjusc co the circumstances he found himself in. The cenrral concepcs involved in the capability approach are capabilicy Capability and functioning remain inrimately connected but indepen­ and funccioning. Functionings are what Sen (1999: 75) calls 'che var­ dently useful concepcs in Sen's wrirings. Because capabiljry is a collec­ ious things a person may value being and doing'. Examples include tion of functionings a person can achieve, capabilicy is evaluated in being adequacely nourished, being in good healch, avoiding escapable rhe 'space' of funcrionings, thus functionings are integral elements morbidicy, being happy, having self-respect, and caking parr in che life of capabilities. However, rhe focus on capabilicy directs our arten­ of che communicy (Sen 1992: 39). There is no definicive lisc of basic cion to freedom and opporrunicy - which funccionings cannot do. funccionings because different sets will be relevant co differenc groups Sen does noc claim chat capabilicy is all that marterSj funcrion­ and in distinct serrings (Sen 2005: 157-160). A person's capability ings retain ongoing value in themselves. He also leaves open the 'represents the various combinations of funccionings (beings and relative imporrance of capability as opposed to functionings as well doings) that the person can achieve' (Sen 1992: 40). To chis degree, as the relacive weighcs to be given to differenr capabilities or che person's capabilicy reflects her freedom or (real) opporrunities. Sen has used these concepts to analyse the qualicy of life, egalicarian justice and poverry inter alia. He has demonstrated the insights which 2 Van Gogh's interprerarion is to be found in rhe Merropolitan Museum of An in arise from a capabilicy or functioning-based analysis in comparison New York. 4 The Capability Approach Introduction 5 functionings (Sen 1992: 49-53 and 1999: 76-77). These are some of a capability approach as providing a more extensive and demanding eva­ range of ways in which the approach is intentionally open-ended and luative framework, for example by introducing human rights or plural incomplete. principles beyond the expansion ofcapabilities- principles which embody In addition to capability and functioning, Sen defines a third core other values or concerns such as equity, sustainability or responsibiJity. concept, agency. On his account, an agent is 'someone who acts and Both interpretations can be found in Sen's writings. Like the narrow brings about change' (Sen 1999: 19). The agency aspect is important in interpretation, the broad interpretation argues that the quality of life assessing 'what a person is free to do and achieve in pursuit of wha tever should be evaluated ptimarily in the space of capabilities. However, goals or values he or she regards as important' (Sen 1985: 203). In some information on capabilities alone is nOt sufficient. Other considera­ writings, agency - as well as capabiliry - figures centrally.
Recommended publications
  • The Capability Approach an Interdisciplinary Introduction
    The Capability Approach An Interdisciplinary Introduction Ingrid Robeyns Version August 14th, 2017 Draft Book Manuscript Not for further circulation, please. Revising will start on September 22nd, 2017. Comments welcome, E: [email protected] 1 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Why the capability approach? ................................................................................. 5 1.2 The worries of the sceptics ....................................................................................... 7 1.3 A yardstick for the evaluation of prosperity and progress ........................... 9 1.4 Scope and development of the capability approach ...................................... 13 1.5 A guide to the reader ................................................................................................ 16 2 Core ideas and the framework .......................................................................... 18 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 18 2.2 A preliminary definition of the capability approach ..................................... 20 2.3 The capability approach versus capability theories ...................................... 24 2.4 The many modes of capability analysis ............................................................. 26 2.5 The modular view of the capability approach ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of Anderson and Satz
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy 5-8-2020 Educational Adequacy, Capability, And Basic Educational Justice: A Revision Of Anderson and Satz Jared Corbett Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses Recommended Citation Corbett, Jared, "Educational Adequacy, Capability, And Basic Educational Justice: A Revision Of Anderson and Satz." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2020. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/272 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Philosophy at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EDUCATIONAL ADEQUACY, CAPABILITY, AND BASIC EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE: A REVISION OF ANDERSON AND SATZ by JARED CORBETT Under the Direction of Suzanne Love, PhD ABSTRACT There are two leading accounts of the principles of educational adequacy by Elizabeth Anderson and Debra Satz. Anderson’s and Satz’s accounts have been criticized for being insufficiently value-pluralist, and both lack a metric of justice. In this paper, I revise the principle of educational adequacy in order to address these problems. I argue that although the principle of educational adequacy cannot be the only principle in a complete theory of educational justice, it can tell us what basic justice in education requires in measurable terms. I highlight two core commitments that Anderson and Satz share: a commitment to 1) democratic egalitarianism and 2) sufficientarian equal citizenship. Then, I reformulate these commitments in a way that accounts for the role that other egalitarian values have to play in a complete theory of justice in education.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom and Responsibility - Sustainable Prosperity Through a Capabilities Lens
    The Jus Semper Global Alliance Living Wages North and South Sustainable Human Development March 2020 BRIEFS ON TRUE DEMOCRACY AND CAPITALISM Freedom and Responsibility - Sustainable Prosperity through a Capabilities Lens Ingrid Robeyns Are we at liberty to live our lives completely as we wish? Or are there constraints we have to be aware of as we want to avoid harming others and respect principles of ecological justice? And are lifestyles that embrace basic principles of ecological justice always dull and simple lives, where many enjoyable things are beyond reach, and which therefore entail a regress in our quality of life? Or is there a possibility to live lives that are at the same time sustainable and just, and that also allow us to be happy and flourishing? This set of questions is one of the most central in the task of thinking about sustainable prosperity. To many people’s minds there is an inevitable trade-off between living ecologically sustainable on the one hand and living with higher levels of well- being on the other. If that trade-off is a real one, then those striving towards a more sustainable future are facing an uphill task, since ecological sustainability will only be possible by lowering people’s well-being—something most people have so far been unwilling to do. But is this trade-off real or is it spurious? Is it possible to lead good lives that are simultaneously just and ecologically sustainable? That’s the question I seek to answer in this essay. I will argue that it is possible to live good lives that are also just and ecologically sustainable, if we understand well-being and human flourishing in terms of human capabilities (while giving more weight to the non-material capabilities), and if we are willing to take the necessary steps to change our behaviour and institutions to overcome moral disengagement with our current lifestyles, which are unjust and ecologically unsustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interview with Ingrid Robeyns
    Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, Volume 11, Issue 1, Spring 2018, pp. 80-99. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v11i1.356 Philosophy With Feet in the Mud: An Interview With Ingrid Robeyns Ingrid Robeyns (Leuven, Belgium, 1972) is a philosopher at Utrecht University, where she has held the Chair in Ethics of Institutions at the Ethics Institute since 2014. She also serves as the president-elect of the Human Development and Capability Association. Before coming to Utrecht University, Robeyns held the chair of Practical Philosophy at the Faculty of Philosophy of Erasmus University from 2008 till 2014. She received an MSc in Economics from KU Leuven in 1997, an MA in Philosophy from the Open University in 2007, and a PhD from the Faculty of Politics and Economics from Cambridge University in 2003. Her PhD thesis, on applying the capability approach to gender inequality, was supervised by Professor Amartya Sen. Robeyns does research in analytical normative philosophy, in particular on theories of justice and applied questions. She also regularly conducts interdisciplinary research. Robeyns is the author of Wellbeing, Freedom, and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re- Examined (2017a). Her work has appeared in various journals, including Ethics, the Journal of Economic Methodology, the Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, and the Journal of Political Philosophy. Robeyns is the principal investigator of Fair Limits, a research project funded by a European Research Council (ERC) consolidator grant, on the question whether there should be upper limits on the amount of financial and ecological resources a person can have. She was elected a member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences this year.
    [Show full text]
  • King's Research Portal
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2018.1538363 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Gross, J., & Wilson, N. (2018). Cultural Democracy: An Ecological and Capabilities Approach. International journal of cultural policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2018.1538363 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • A JOURNEY of ACADEMIC INQUIRY Exploring Capabilities and Play
    A JOURNEY OF ACADEMIC INQUIRY Exploring capabilities and play Malida Mooken Stirling Management School University of Stirling Submitted for fulfillment of the degree of PhD November 2014 DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is my own work and that it has been submitted only for the degree of PhD. Please note that a version of Chapter 7, ‘The capabilities of academic researchers and academic poverty’ has recently been published as a paper (co-authored with Professor Roger Sugden) in Kyklos, 67 (4), November 2014. Malida Mooken 24 November 2014 ii ABSTRACT The underlying concern in this thesis is with the real opportunities that people have to pursue beings and doings that they have reason to value. This concern is explored through the development of four themes, namely ‘shaping aspirations’, ‘capabilities of academic researchers’, ‘qualities of play’, and ‘university internationalisation’. These themes emerged during my journey of academic inquiry, which included empirical research conducted in two distinct settings. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The development of this thesis owes much to the invaluable discussions that I had with Professor Roger Sugden. His comments on various drafts that I wrote helped deepen the analyses. Dr Doris Eikhof also provided critical suggestions for the thesis. I am thankful to both of them for their patience and unwavering support. Marcela Valania offered insights, which helped refine some arguments and the overall writing of an earlier draft of my thesis, for which I am thankful. I would like to thank Professor Linda Bauld and Professor Bernard Burnes for their support. Particular thanks are due to Professor Gert Biesta and Professor Keith Culver for critical comments on a draft of the chapter on John Dewey and his approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Reply to My Critics
    Journal of Human Development and Capabilities A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development ISSN: 1945-2829 (Print) 1945-2837 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjhd20 Reply to my Critics Ingrid Robeyns To cite this article: Ingrid Robeyns (2019) Reply to my Critics, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20:3, 368-374, DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2019.1640976 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1640976 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 22 Jul 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 139 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cjhd20 Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 2019 Vol. 20, No. 3, 368–374, https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1640976 Reply to my Critics INGRID ROBEYNS Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Utrecht University, Netherlands I am very grateful to Julian Culp, Pepi Patrón, Henry Richardson and Erik Schokkaert for their engagement with my book. The four critiques are in many ways very different, and that is probably what was to be expected, given that the book targets readers from different disciplines, and given that the capability approach is used by such a diverse group of stu- dents, scholars, and professionals working on social change outside academia. Interdiscipli- narity and multidisciplinarity are processes to which much lip-service is paid in academia, and which many capability scholars’ value highly and try to practice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Capabilities Approach As a Foundation for an Ethical-Political Theory of the Good
    Université de Montréal The Capabilities Approach as a Foundation for an Ethical-Political Theory of the Good par Daniel Kurstak Département de Philosophie, Faculté des arts et des sciences Thèse présentée à la Faculté des arts et des sciences en vue de l’obtention du grade de Ph.D. en Philosophie Décembre, 2011 © Daniel Kurstak, 2011 Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-78962-9 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-78962-9 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • What, If Anything, Is Wrong with Extreme Wealth?
    Journal of Human Development and Capabilities A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development ISSN: 1945-2829 (Print) 1945-2837 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjhd20 What, if Anything, is Wrong with Extreme Wealth? Ingrid Robeyns To cite this article: Ingrid Robeyns (2019) What, if Anything, is Wrong with Extreme Wealth?, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20:3, 251-266, DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2019.1633734 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1633734 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 24 Jun 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 505 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cjhd20 Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 2019 Vol. 20, No. 3, 251–266, https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1633734 What, if Anything, is Wrong with Extreme Wealth? INGRID ROBEYNS Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands ABSTRACT This paper proposes a view, called limitarianism, which suggests that there should be upper limits to the amount of income and wealth a person can hold. One argument for limitarianism is that superriches can undermine political equality. The other reason is that it would be better if the surplus money that superrich households have were to be used to meet unmet urgent needs and local and global collective action problems. A particular urgent case of the latter is climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2009 Prof. Dr. Ingrid Robeyns
    January 2009 Prof. dr. Ingrid Robeyns Born in Leuven (Belgium) on September 10, 1972 Belgian citizenship, Dutch residency Erasmus University Rotterdam Faculty of Philosophy PO 1738 3000 DR Rotterdam The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] homepage: www.ingridrobeyns.nl Current position September Professor in Practical Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, Erasmus 2008 onwards University Rotterdam. VIDI-research project on ‘Social Justice and the New Welfare State’ (2006- 2011), funded by the Dutch Research Council (NWO). Previous positions Oct. 2006- Senior Researcher in political theory, Radboud University Nijmegen, Aug. 2008 Department of Political Science (with tenure). Oct. 2006- Visiting professor for the Chaire Jacques Leclercq, Université Catholique de Sept. 2007 Louvain-la-Neuve, Department of anthropology and sociology, Belgium. Oct. 2002- Post-doctoral research fellow, University of Amsterdam, Department of Sept. 2006 political science. Research project on “the capability approach to distributive justice in liberal-democratic welfare states”, funded by the Dutch Research Council (NWO). May-June Visiting scholar, Department of Government, London School of Economics 2005 and Political Science, England. January-July Visiting scholar, Department of Philosophy, Columbia University, New 2004 York, USA. 1999-2002 Supervisor and ‘free-lance’ lecturer on Women in Society, Department of Social and Political Science, Cambridge University, England. 1 1995-1998 Research and teaching assistant in public economics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium Training and degrees PhD awarded by the Faculty of Economics and Politics, Cambridge University, UK (congregation date: May 2003). Dissertation: Gender Inequality. A Capability Perspective. Advisor: Prof. Amartya Sen Examiners: Prof. Anne Phillips (LSE) and Prof. Jane Humphries (All Souls’ College, Oxford) Master of Arts in (analytical) Philosophy, British Open University, 2007 (Distinction).
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth Anderson's Vita
    Elizabeth Anderson's Vita ELIZABETH S. ANDERSON John Rawls Collegiate Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies Arthur F. Thurnau Professor University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Department of Philosophy Angell Hall 2239 / 435 South State St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1003 Office: 734-763-2118 Fax: 734-763-8071 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~eandersn/ EMPLOYMENT University of Michigan, John Rawls Collegiate Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies, 2005- University of Michigan, Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies, 1999-. University of Michigan, Associate Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies, 1993-1999. University of Michigan, Adjunct Professor of Law, 1995, 1999, 2000. University of Michigan, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, 1987-1993. Swarthmore College, Visiting Instructor in Philosophy, 1985-6. Harvard University, Teaching Fellow, 1983-1985. EDUCATION Harvard University, Department of Philosophy, 1981-1987. A.M. Philosophy, 1984. Ph.D. 1987. Swarthmore College, 1977-1981. B.A. Philosophy with minor in Economics, High Honors, 1981. HONORS, GRANTS AND FELLOWSHIPS John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellowship, 2013 ACLS Fellowship, 2013 Michigan Humanities Award, 2013 (declined) Three Quarks Daily Philosophy Prize for 2012 blog entry, 2nd place Joseph B. Gittler Award, American Philosophical Association (for "an outstanding scholarly contribution in the philosophy of one or more of the social sciences," in recognition of The Imperative of Integration, 2011) Fellow, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2008 Michigan Humanities Fellow (University of Michigan), 2007 Named John Rawls Collegiate Professor, 2005 Honorable Mention, Fred Berger Memorial Prize (American Philosophical Association), 2003 (for "Expressive Theories of Law") John H.
    [Show full text]
  • Amartya Sen Work and Ideas.Qxd
    Amartya Sen's Work and Ideas A Gender Perspective New in 2005 from Routledge Edited by Bina Agarwal, University of Delhi, India, Jane Humphries, University of Oxford, UK, and Ingrid Robeyns, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands This unique volume is the first to examine Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen's ideas through the lens of gender. His humanitarian approach to economics has been crucial to the development of several aspects of feminist economics and gender analysis. This book outlines the range and usefulness of his work for gender analysis while also exploring some of its silences and implicit assumptions. The result is a collection of groundbreaking and insightful essays which cover major topics in Sen's work, such as the capability approach, justice, freedom, social choice, agency, missing women and development and well-being. Perspectives have been drawn from both developing and developed countries, with most of the authors applying Sen's concepts to cultural, geographic and historical contexts which differ from his original applications. Significant highlights include a wide-ranging conversation between the book's editors and Sen on many aspects of his work, and an essay by Sen himself on why he is disinclined to provide a definitive list of capabilities. These essays were previously published in Feminist Economics. Contents: Amartya Sen: A Biographical Note Exploring the Challenges of Amartya Sen’s Work and Ideas: An Introduction Bina Agarwal, Jane Humphries and Ingrid Robeyns Articles Gender and the Foundations of Social Choice: The Role of Situated Agency Fabienne Peter Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice Martha C.
    [Show full text]