DOCSLIB.ORG

PLANNING and HIGHWAYS REGULATORY COMMITTEE Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PLANNING and HIGHWAYS REGULATORY COMMITTEE Date Committee: PLANNING AND HIGHWAYS REGULATORY COMMITTEE Date: MONDAY, 7 TH JUNE 2010 Venue: LANCASTER TOWN HALL Time: 10.30 A.M. A G E N D A Apologies for Absence 1 Appointment of Vice-Chairman 2 Minutes of the Meeting held on 10th May 2010 (previously circulated) 3 Items of Urgent Business authorised by the Chairman 4 Declarations of Interest Planning Applications for Decision Community Safety Implications In preparing the reports for this Agenda, regard has been paid to the implications of the proposed developments on Community Safety issues. Where it is considered the proposed development has particular implications for Community Safety, this issue is fully considered within the main body of the report on that specific application. Category A Applications Applications to be dealt with by the District Council without formal consultation with the County Council. 5 A5 10/00185/CU Castle View Caravan Park, Kellet Ward (Pages 1 - 5) Borwick Road, Capernwray Change of use of land for extension to existing caravan park, erection of an office building, provision of a new treatment plant and reed bed pond for Mr John McCarthy 6 A6 09/01015/CU 4 Old Station Yard, Kirkby Upper Lune (Pages 6 - Lonsdale, Carnforth Valley 14) Ward Retrospective application for use of land and buildings for stoneworking, storage and distribution (B2/B8 use) and retention of an open-fronted workshop building for Fairhurst Stone 7 A7 10/00192/RCN Hale Carr Caravan Park, Hale Carr Heysham (Pages 15 - Lane, Heysham Central 18) Ward Removal of conditions on applications 2/2/3536, 84/1172 and 97/1194 which limit the occupancy to gypsies or travellers only and which will allow for unrestricted occupancy and siting of static caravans for Mr N Staples 8 A8 10/00271/FUL Toll Bar Garage, 168 Scotforth Scotforth (Pages 19 - Road, Lancaster West Ward 23) Extension of time limit on application 07/01666/FUL for demolition of existing garage, redevelopment and construction of residential apartments (29 x 2 bed and 5 x 1 bed), associated car parking, landscaping and engineering operations for Mr Trevor Ingram 9 A9 10/00316/RCN Letter Box Field, Ford Lane, Silverdale (Pages 24 - Silverdale Ward 27) Removal of condition 4 on application 08/00937/FUL relating to details of the new stone wall and access for Mr T and Mrs M Mackintosh 10 A10 10/00131/FUL 1 The Headlands, Heysham, Heysham (Pages 28 - Morecambe South 30) Ward Erection of a two storey extension to the rear including the creation of a balcony for Mr Mike Wolff 11 A11 10/00087/FUL 5 The Headlands, Heysham, Heysham (Pages 31 - Morecambe South 33) Ward Erection of single storey extensions to form new conservatory, garage and sitting room for Shaun Whatmuff 12 A12 10/00306/OUT Nightingale Hall, Quernmore Bulk Ward (Pages 34 - Road, Lancaster 40) Extension of time limit on application 06/00661/OUT for the redevelopment of the site for residential use for Fats and Proteins UK Ltd (Mr Edmund Metcalfe) 13 A13 10/00243/FUL Booths, Scotland Road, Carnforth Carnforth (Pages 41 - Ward 47) Erection of an extension to rear of existing Supermarket for Mr Graham Booth Category D Application Application for development by a District Council. 14 A14 10/00152/DPA Town Hall, Dalton Square, Duke's (Pages 48 - Lancaster Ward 50) Listed building application for renewal of rainwater goods for Lancaster City Council 15 Enforcement Update - Low Mill, Caton-with-Littledale (Pages 51 - 55) Report of Head of Regeneration and Policy 16 Delegated Planning Decisions (Pages 56 - 63) ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS (i) Membership Councillors Eileen Blamire (Chairman), Ken Brown, Keith Budden, Anne Chapman, Chris Coates, John Day, Roger Dennison, Sheila Denwood, Mike Greenall, Emily Heath, Helen Helme, Andrew Kay, Geoff Marsland, Joyce Pritchard, Robert Redfern, Peter Robinson, Bob Roe, Sylvia Rogerson, Roger Sherlock and Peter Williamson (ii) Substitute Membership Councillors Jon Barry, Abbott Bryning, John Gilbert, Janice Hanson, Tony Johnson, Ian McCulloch, Keith Sowden, Joyce Taylor, Malcolm Thomas and Paul Woodruff (iii) Queries regarding this Agenda Please contact Jane Glenton, Democratic Services, telephone (01524) 582068 or, alternatively, email [email protected] (iv) Changes to Membership, substitutions or apologies Please contact Members’ Secretary, telephone (01524) 582170 or, alternatively, email [email protected]. MARK CULLINAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE, TOWN HALL, DALTON SQUARE, LANCASTER, LA1 1PJ Published on Wednesday, 26 th May 2010 Page 1 Agenda Item Committee Date AgendaApplication Item Number 5 A5 7 June 2010 10/00185/CU Application Site Proposal Castle View Caravan Park Change of use of land for extension to existing caravan park, erection of an office building, provision Borwick Road of a new treatment plant and reed bed pond Capernwray Carnforth Name of Applicant Name of Agent Mr John McCarthy Mr C Holmes Decision Target Date Reason For Delay 10 May 2010 Committee Cycle Case Officer Mr Andrew Holden Departure No Summary of Recommendation Approval subject to conditions 1.0 The Site and its Surroundings 1.1 The application site is located off Borwick Road, close to its junction with Borron Lane, Capernwray. The site lies alongside land currently developed as a static caravan site known as Castle View Caravan Park. This site shares an access from Borwick Road which splits to serve The Glade Caravan Park to the north and Castle View Caravan Park to the west. Both sites are in the ownership of the applicant, Mr McCarthy. 1.2 The site is part of an extensive area of land owned by the applicant including an equine centre to the north of the application site and extensive areas of woodland to the east and south of the site. The approach to the site is relatively level with o pen pasture to either side of the main entrance road. Open pasture lies to the north of the site but this is outside the ownership of the applicant. Land to the south of the site rises steeply and until recently was clad in maturing deciduous woodland. Large areas of this woodland have now been felled leading down to the southern boundary of application site. Blocks of tree planting lie to the north of the site on the other side of the main access road into Castle View Caravan Park. 1.3 The main application site itself is bounded to the east and south by a narrow belt of tree planting with strips of tree planting running across the site. The land was used for the commercial growing of Christmas trees, this has now ceased and some trees remain within the plot. To the north of the site lays a block of woodland close to the access road and rising ground to the south. 2.0 The Proposal 2.1 The application seeks consent for three separate elements all of which are inter-related: a. Change of use of land for the extension of the existing static caravan site; b. Erection of an office building; and, c. Provision of a new packaged treatment plant and associated reed bed pond. Page 2 2.2 The change of use of the land relates mainly to a rectangular area of land to the south of the access road. Following discussion with the agent the site is proposing the siting of a total of 31 static caravans, associated car parking, landscaping and amenity area. The caravan site extension also includes a narrow strip of land to the north of the access road which will accommodate five of the 31 units and the new office building. 2.3 The office building is located at the junction of the access road serving The Glade and Castle View, the proposal is to replace a small office in the centre of the Castle View site and develop a new larger office building to act as reception, office and security in connection with the two sites but also provide for additional upper floor office accommodation in connection with the management of the other caravan sites owned by the applicant (four others in the Carnforth area). The office is a single storey building with additional accommodation in the roof space. The materials are to be local stone plinth with rendered walls under a natural slate roof. 2.4 The new sewage treatment plant and associated reed bed pond is to be located at the northern end of the complex close to The Glade Caravan Park. Currently there is no mains drainage to either The Glade and Castle View and are currently treated by a series of septic tanks. The treatment plant will take flows form Castle View park and the adjacent equine centre at Blackholme Farm. Flows from The Glade septic tank will be directed into the reed bed for further cleansing and a wild life pond. 3.0 Site History 3.1 The site has a long planning history dated back over 30 years. The most recent and pertinent applications are listed below. Application Number Proposal Decision 96/00613/CU C/U of lad to form extension to existing holiday park for an Approved Mar 1997 additional 12 caravans. 98/01157/FUL Modification to condition No 3 on 75/01167 to extend Approved Dec 2001 season to ten and half months 99/00533/CU C/C land for the siting of 12 static caravans Approved Dec 2001 02/01090/FUL Siting of six holiday chalets and c/u to touring caravan Approved Nov 2002 area 04/01251/CU C/U part of site for the siting of eight log cabins to place of Approved Jul 2005 nine touring caravans. 08/1327/CU C/U from 19 touring pitches to 17 static pitches Approved Jan 2009 4.0 Consultation Responses 4.1 The following responses have been received from statutory consultees: Statutory Consultee Response County Highways At 38 static pitches, this application is a significant extension to the existing caravan site and will result in additional car movements to and from the site.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proceedings W Esley Historical Society
    Proceedings OF THE W esley Historical Society Editor: REv. JOHN C. BOWMER, M.A., B.D., Ph.D. Volume XL June 1975 JOHN WESLEY, LITERARY ARBITER An Introduction to his use of the Asterisk EADERS turning to the edition of his Works published by John Wesley in thirty-two volumes during the years 1771-4 R may naturally be surprised to find him deserting his normal custom (and the normal custom of the century) of using asterisks as the primary means for directing attention to footnotes. Instead he employs daggers, double daggers, parallel lines, the section mark, the paragraph symbol, but only occasionally asterisks, and then ob­ viously in error.1 On the other hand, the curious reader will also be surprised from time to time to discover that many paragraphs begin with an asterisk. If his curiosity is sufficiently aroused, he may turn to the preface in volume i to discover what Wesley was about. He might also wish to know when W esley began this practice, how fully he carried it out, and upon what principles. Perhaps he would also wonder whether this unusual feature was in fact unique. Wesley was in fact indicating purple passages. He may have derived the idea from Alexander Pope, who prefaced his edition of Shakespeare's works by pointing out: Some of the most shining passages are distinguished by con~mas in the margin; and where the beauty lay not in particulars but in the whole, a star is prefixed to the scene. Pope continued : This seems to me a shorter and less ostentatious method of performing the better half of criticism (namely the pointing out an author's excel­ lencies) than to fill a whole page with citations of fine passages, with general applauses, or empty exclamations at the tail of them.2 There is no certainty which edition (or editions) of Shakespeare Wesley used, but his diary shows him reading several of the tragedies and histories in 1726-the year after Pope's edition was published.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Written Description of the Boundary Relating to the Yorkshire Dales National Park
    Written Description of the Boundary relating to the Yorkshire Dales National Park (Designation) (Variation) Confirmation Order 2015 Introduction This description is designed to be read in conjunction with the 1:25,000 scale maps included within the Yorkshire Dales National Park (Designation) (Variation) Confirmation Order 2015 as confirmed by the Secretary of State on 23rd day of October 2015. It does not form part of the Order but is intended to assist interpretation of the map against features on the ground. Map references in italics refer to the map numbers in the top right corner of the maps bound in with the Order. Map references within the text e.g. SD655749 are six figure Ordnance Survey Grid References. The description of the boundary proceeds round the area of the boundary variations in a clockwise direction (in line with the direction of the text in the original boundary description which accompanied the 1953 Yorkshire Dales National Park Designation Order), from the point at which it deviates from the original boundary, to the point at which it re-joins it. In line with the description of the 1953 boundary, and unless otherwise stated: where the boundary follows roads and tracks, it follows the edge of the metalled surface of the road and the edge of the track, excluding the roads and tracks themselves (there are some exceptions, as stated below); and in the case of water courses, if it is not stated whether the boundary follows the edge or the centre, the boundary follows the centre of the water course (although in this description the edge of water courses is generally stated).
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Re Planning Application for 9 Houses Dec 2016
    DRAUGHTON PARISH COUNCIL The Pines Draughton Skipton BD23 6DU 2 January 2017 Development Control Services Craven District Council 1 Belle Vue Square Skipton BD23 1FJ Attn: Ms G Kennedy Dear Sirs Application Ref: 24/2016/17616 – Land at Draughton off access road to A65 Thank you for consulting us on the above planning application, which concerns a proposed development for 9 residential dwellings off the old A65 in Draughton parish. We object to this development for the reasons set out below. Summary The area of proposed development is a field sloping down from the old A65 road into the village to the tree lined Howgill Beck below, a tributary of the River Wharfe. It is currently used as grazing land. Draughton is a small attractive village, typical of the Yorkshire Dales, with stone built properties and dry stone walls much in evidence. Its pattern of settlement is tightly knit, having been strongly influenced by the steep contours created by the valley formed by Howgill Beck. The scenic Dales landscape surrounding the village is a key feature in its setting, and one which is recognised by the widely- drawn conservation area boundary. These are the main attributes from which the locality derives its character and appearance. Against this background, there are no sites included as preferred options for housing development in Draughton in the draft Local Plan. Draughton is not regarded as a sustainable location for growth because of the lack of local amenities, facilities and infrastructure. This development will not bring any further facilities or infrastructure into the village; it will only put greater strain on the existing, very limited facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Statement
    Planning Statement Planning Application for the Erection of 49 Dwellings, New Church Car Park and Public Open Space Land to the East of Burley in Wharfedale, West of the A65, Bradford For Jomast Developments Ltd Burley in Wharfedale TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction & Background .................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Planning History ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Site and Surroundings ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2. The Development Proposals ................................................................................................................. 6 3. Policy Assessment .................................................................................................................................... 7 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) ............................................................................................ 7 Bradford District Replacement Unitary Development Plan (October 2005) (Saved Policies 2008) .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Resources
    SETTLE – CARLISLE RAILWAY DIRECTORY OF RESOURCES A listing of printed, audio-visual and other resources including museums, public exhibitions and heritage sites * * * Compiled by Nigel Mussett 2016 Petteril Bridge Junction CARLISLE SCOTBY River Eden CUMWHINTON COTEHILL Cotehill viaduct Dry Beck viaduct ARMATHWAITE Armathwaite viaduct Armathwaite tunnel Baron Wood tunnels 1 (south) & 2 (north) LAZONBY & KIRKOSWALD Lazonby tunnel Eden Lacy viaduct LITTLE SALKELD Little Salkeld viaduct + Cross Fell 2930 ft LANGWATHBY Waste Bank Culgaith tunnel CULGAITH Crowdundle viaduct NEWBIGGIN LONG MARTON Long Marton viaduct APPLEBY Ormside viaduct ORMSIDE Helm tunnel Griseburn viaduct Crosby Garrett viaduct CROSBY GARRETT Crosby Garrett tunnel Smardale viaduct KIRKBY STEPHEN Birkett tunnel Wild Boar Fell 2323 ft + Ais Gill viaduct Shotlock Hill tunnel Lunds viaduct Moorcock tunnel Dandry Mire viaduct Mossdale Head tunnel GARSDALE Appersett Gill viaduct Mossdale Gill viaduct HAWES Rise Hill tunnel DENT Arten Gill viaduct Blea Moor tunnel Dent Head viaduct Whernside 2415 ft + Ribblehead viaduct RIBBLEHEAD + Penyghent 2277 ft Ingleborough 2372 ft + HORTON IN RIBBLESDALE Little viaduct Ribble Bridge Sheriff Brow viaduct Taitlands tunnel Settle viaduct Marshfield viaduct SETTLE Settle Junction River Ribble © NJM 2016 Route map of the Settle—Carlisle Railway and the Hawes Branch GRADIENT PROFILE Gargrave to Carlisle After The Cumbrian Railways Association ’The Midland’s Settle & Carlisle Distance Diagrams’ 1992. CONTENTS Route map of the Settle-Carlisle Railway Gradient profile Introduction A. Primary Sources B. Books, pamphlets and leaflets C. Periodicals and articles D. Research Studies E. Maps F. Pictorial images: photographs, postcards, greetings cards, paintings and posters G. Audio-recordings: records, tapes and CDs H. Audio-visual recordings: films, videos and DVDs I.
    [Show full text]
  • Otley TC Rail Study Final Report March 2004
    Otley Rail Link Study Final Report in association with Otley Rail Link Study Final Report in association with Job number Prepared by Verified by Approved by Status Issue number Date D048006 SW / JCS FINAL 1 05/03/2004 JMP Consultants Ltd Otley Rail Link Study – Final Report Otley Rail Link Study Final Report Contents 0 Executive summary.......................................................................................0 1 Introduction....................................................................................................2 2 Study approach.............................................................................................4 3 Infrastructure elements .................................................................................6 Permanent way and earthworks............................................................................ 6 Structures ................................................................................................................. 9 Station design........................................................................................................ 10 Electrification......................................................................................................... 12 Signalling ............................................................................................................... 12 Infrastructure costs................................................................................................ 12 Summary...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Sirs, Bradford Local Plan Reg 18 Consultation
    Dear Sirs, Bradford Local Plan Reg 18 Consultation 2021 We broadly support the points made by Andrew Wood of CPRE West Yorkshire, but make the following additional points. POLICY CONFLICT Concerning the sites selected for development in Ilkley there is a direct conflict with the policies, for example:- protecting the green belt minimising travel to work providing adequate infrastructure creating the South Pennines Regional Park maximising the benefit of YWCA funds to support brownfield development all of the changes arising from the Leeds City Region and Transport for the North. No account has been paid to the Planning White Paper which specifically protects green belt and conservation areas. GREEN BELT We have been repeatedly reassured that Green Belt is safeguarded against development by government ministers in person, through the national press and television. A great deal of emphasis is being placed on ‘weak boundaries’ to green belt. This term is meaningless and barely relevant. The boundaries are not weak. They have lasted for several decades. Using up the two indicated areas of green belt in Ben Rhydding does not in any way safeguard or make stronger the adjacent areas. It reduces the greenbelt between Burley in Wharfedale and Ben Rhydding. Describing the boundaries as weak appears to mean that the council wants to develop the sites they enclose. Describing boundaries as less durable is equally specious; they have lasted for at least 25 years and there is no case to change them. The intention of green belt is that it remains in perpetuity. Green belt is not necessarily of high landscape value.
    [Show full text]
  • PDW03193 Aireborough HG2-10
    Ref: PDW03193 HMCA\Topic: Aireborough Subject: Site in the plan Site: HG2-10 - Gill Lane, Yeadon LS19 Agree with proposed use? No Soundness Consider the plan sound? No Test of soundness addressed: Positively prepared Effective Justified Consistent with NPPF Changes required to make sound: This site should not be considered for housing as the local area, transport and services simply cannot cope with more people. Leeds City Council are just going to make the area a ghetto which people will not want to live in if this over-development continues. Leeds should be concentrating on brown field sites around the city, These may be more difficult to develop but the house building companies will still take up the sites if this is all they are offered and the Council will have the backing of its residents for this action. Issues Issue: Ecology/Landscape/Trees The site consists of open pasture / farmland which has never been developed and the land is in use by a local farmer. The site contains many ancient trees - beautiful horse chestnuts and hawthorn which are covered in blossom in spring - and hedgerows and sadly is the only open green land between Rawdon / Henshaw and Guiseley along the A65 road. It is a breath of fresh air in what has sadly become a completely built up area due Leeds City Councils planning policies which have generally ruined the area by over-development. The fields provide a home for wildlife including foxes, deer and owls - all of which I have seen myself. Issue: Conservation and heritage This site should have been included in the recently formed Nether Yeadon conservation area which is borders as it historically linked with the unique pre- industrial revolution development of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Priorities for New Stations on the Leeds-Harrogate-York Railway “Leeds Bradford Airport Parkway” 1
    Our Ref: MJL/HT470-LBIA Parkway+.doc Priorities for new stations on the Leeds-Harrogate-York railway “Leeds Bradford Airport Parkway” 1. Background The route, which provides a semi-orbital link between Leeds, Horsforth, Harrogate, Knaresborough and York, is a candidate and priority for electrification at 25kV during Control Period 6 (2019-2024). This has been justified on account of a robust business case having been demonstrated to Government to deal with existing frustrated demand and forecast growth along with efficiency of operation. Significant all-day additional capacity through a combination of longer and more frequent trains (15” interval proposed between Leeds and Harrogate) is planned. The studies were initiated and driven by the Harrogate Chamber of Trade and Commerce and funded by North Yorkshire County Council, Metro and York City Council. The route passes within close proximity of a number of key venues which are not served effectively by rail. One of these is Leeds Bradford International Airport, where the railway is approximately 1.1 miles from the Airport’s passenger terminal. The Airport’s own car-park shuttle buses already operate within 0.5 miles of the route near to Bramhope Tunnel southern portal. Accessibility to the Airport by public transport is poor, requiring slow and inconvenient bus journeys to and from Leeds, Harrogate and Bradford centres. Access therefore is both circuitous and time consuming from all parts of the wider Leeds City Region. The existing station at Horsforth is the closest existing station to the Airport being approximately 2.6 miles by road from the passenger terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) Has Been Prepared to Support the Delivery and Implementation of the Craven Local Plan (The Local Plan)
    INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN 29th March 2018 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 3 2 Infrastructure Requirements over the Plan Period ............................................................................ 11 3 Infrastructure Requirements - Highways and Transport....................................................................... 15 4 Water Supply, Treatment and Sewerage ............................................................................................... 26 5 Gas Networks .......................................................................................................................................... 31 6 Electricity ................................................................................................................................................. 33 7 Flood Risk Management and Drainage Infrastructure .......................................................................... 35 8 Broadband and Telecommunications .................................................................................................... 38 9 Education ................................................................................................................................................ 41 10 Emergency Services ............................................................................................................................ 48 11 Household Waste Recycling and Waste Disposal Current Provision..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Re Planning Application for 4 Houses Jan 18 Final
    DRAUGHTON PARISH COUNCIL The Pines Draughton Skipton BD23 6DU 9 February 2018 Development Control Services Craven District Council Attn: Ms G Kennedy Dear Sirs Application Ref. 2018/18883/FUL– Land at Draughton off access road to A65 Thank you for consulting us on the above planning application, which concerns a full application for a housing development off the old A65 in Draughton parish. We object to this application for the reasons set out in this letter and attached Annexe. In the summary section below, we give reasons for our objection with reference to material planning considerations, and in the Annexe we provide detailed comments, responding specifically to the proposals set out in the applicant’s planning statement and associated documents. The Parish Council’s objection to this application is drawn from views expressed at a well-attended meeting held on 8 February 2018, at which residents overwhelmingly voted against the development. The Council has resolved to object principally because the site is inappropriate for development: it is in open countryside, outside the village boundary, in the Draughton Conservation Area, and in an unsustainable location. The site The area of proposed development is a field sloping down from the old A65 road into the village to the tree lined Howgill Beck below, a tributary of the River Wharfe. It has until recently been used as grazing land. Draughton is a small attractive village, typical of the Yorkshire Dales, lying on the boundary of the National Park and visible from it. It is characterised by its setting, with stone-built properties and dry-stone walls much in evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Burley Parish Council Representations to the Sun Lane Planning Inquiry Planning Submission 16/07870/MAO
    Burley Parish Council Representations to the Sun Lane Planning Inquiry Planning Submission 16/07870/MAO Burley Parish Council - Representations to the Sun Lane Planning Inquiry 1 Executive Summary As it is located along a key road and public transport corridor, Burley should make a contribution towards meeting the District’s needs for housing and employment. Indeed, the Parish Council maintain that proposals for housing development on sites within the settlement boundary for Burley village will be supported when they would not result in the loss of an open space identified as being important to the community (source: Burley Neighbourhood Plan Policy BW4 p15) The Parish Council are not opposed to more new homes in the village and indeed fully supported the planning application for several new housing developments such as new homes at Greenholme Mills (149 homes), but the proposal for 500 homes at Sun Lane poses some significant challenges, specifically: A Burley-in-Wharfedale as a Growth Area: i) The planning authority contravene the definition of a growth area since there is little by way of existing employment in Burley-in-Wharfedale, and no new employment or external economic activity being planned for this area ii) Given recent residential developments, the number of homes the village is capable of supporting without significant improvements in infrastructure, is at its upper limit. As a result, the Parish Council would maintain the village has been wrongly identified as a local growth centre B Core Strategy: i) BDMC has not yet revised
    [Show full text]