DOCSLIB.ORG

The Cossacks of Siberia the Journal of Social Science 56 [2005] Pp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Cossacks of Siberia the Journal of Social Science 56 [2005] Pp View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE 『社会科学ジャーナル』56〔2005〕 The Cossacks of Siberia The Journal of Social Science 56 [2005] pp. 29-48 The Cossacks of Siberia: Tailoring Identity in Post Soviet Space Elena Kozoulina * The Czarist Russian Cossacks invaded our Heilongjian province and built a fortress in Yakutsk and Nerchinsk as a base for further expansion. They looted and killed in Chinese lands, and even ate human flesh like animals. The Manchu troops and various ethnic groups resisted heroically. (From a 7th grade Chinese history textbook, 2002) Indeed, in the 21st century, this description of the Cossack people sounds odd, outdated and politically incorrect. As Horvat and Hielscher (2003) document, the depiction of different groups of people in history textbooks is a common source of controversy both within and between nation states. Evidently, current Chinese nationalistic rhetoric describes the Cossack people as savage outsiders to induce a sentiment of solidarity in the face of an unknown and, thus, dangerous enemy. How much do we know about the Cossack people today and what niche do they occupy in the current Russian society? The answers to these questions are still largely unknown. The questions of who the Cossack people are and how to reveal their human face to the rest of an unaware society captured my consciousness since I first met these people during my fieldwork in Eastern Siberia, in the town of Ulan-Ude, in July 2004. The fieldwork was part of the research leading to a doctoral degree at the International Christian University in Tokyo, Japan. The data were collected in a series of in-depth interviews with the “native” people of the Republic of Buryatia, namely, the Evenki, Buryats and mainstream Russians. Upon arrival to the main site of my research, I realized the actual complexity of the category, * Graduate of GSPA 29 The Cossacks of Siberia “mainstream Russians.” This category fell into three subcategories, namely, the Old Believer people, ethnically mixed Russians (called Siberians) and the Cossack people. Two male Cossacks, Kisilev Evgenii Viktorovich and Kasyanov Yurii Leonidovich, both leaders in the Cossack cultural revival movement (and, thus, willing to be identified by name), participated in my research and agreed to do in-depth interviews and shared much documentary material on Cossack history. The main purpose of this article is to look at the current Cossack people’s cultural revival movement and the reconstruction of their identity in post-Soviet space. This article is also part of research in progress on the identity continuity of the people of Eastern Siberia, among whom are the Cossack people. To be correct, they are called the Zabaikalye Cossacks (Zabaikalye literally means the area behind Lake Baikal). The major source of data in this article is based on the informal interviews with the Cossack people, documentary review and the analysis of the revival movement of the Cossacks of Russia, particularly in Siberia. The story of the Zabaikalye Cossacks is covered in seven sections. The first section analyses the milestones of Cossack history and their arrival in Siberia. The second section considers the foundation of the Zabaikalye Cossack Army. The third section discusses the problem of the erasure of Cossack identity during the Soviet era. Section four analyses the current identity dynamics and cultural revival movement of the Cossacks. Section five considers the role of the Cossack organizations in the cultural revival movement. Section six discusses the internal and external threats to Cossack identity in the post-Soviet space of the Russian Federation. And finally, section seven provides general conclusions to this article. *** The first Cossack I interviewed, presented a startling combination of symbols of the bygone Soviet era, Cossack culture and the emerging neo-Russian culture which were interwoven into an intricate web of meanings, unintelligible to outsiders. I met Cossack Kisilev Evgenii Viktorovich in his office. The office 30 31 The Cossacks of Siberia would have been a typical one in a former Soviet state enterprise, but with one exception. The then mandatory portrait of Lenin and other Communist Party leaders had been discarded. Instead, a huge oil portrait of the Emperor Nicolas II was installed. In the corner of the office there were two icons of the Virgin Mary and of Saint George the Victor. As was revealed in the interviews later, the Czar and the Virgin Mary are two essential symbols of Cossack spiritual culture. The Cossack’s face was maimed with a scar which ran across his eyebrow. I saw the scar and thought that this man had teleported from old Soviet films (then the only available source of information about the Cossacks) which portrayed them as merciless, unintelligent and brutal people who fought against the Bolsheviks to stop the rise of Soviet power in Siberia. The whole picture was an oxymoron in the 21st century. In reality, the scar was the price which Mr. Kisilev paid for being a Cossack. It turned out he was heavily beaten by some skinhead youth, yet another sad reality of contemporary Russia, for wearing the Cossack uniform and, thus, for being proud of his heritage. In that battle he nearly lost his eye. However, another battle of his life was ahead of him: the struggle to restore the Cossack identity erased by Soviet propaganda, the struggle to revive the Cossack culture and the struggle to be called a people. Conventional wisdom suggests that I look at the historical documents to shed light on some of the economic, social and political aspects of the life of Cossack communities and the role they played in the settlement of Siberia. I. The Arrival in Siberia The analysis of the documents available did not clarify this widely contested subject of the Cossacks. It is contested regarding the following issues. Firstly, whether there was a “settlement” of Siberia or there was an “invasion/conquest.” (Slezkine, 1994) Secondly, whether the Cossacks occupied “no man’s lands, empty lands” (Mastyugina and Perepelkin, 1996), or did they “push” the aboriginal Evenki and other nomadic tribes from their traditional territories. 30 31 The Cossacks of Siberia (Belikov, 1994) And finally, whether there is a Cossack peoples’ “cultural revival” (Skinner, 1994), or are the Cossacks a “discontented radical power.” (Lieven, 1998) The Cossacks made their entry into the history of Russia in the period after the rule of the Golden Horde, when the Cossacks were empowered by the Russian Czars to extend Imperial borders and guard them from intrusions. In 1582, the Cossack, Yermak, led a force that claimed all of Siberia in the name of the Russian Czar. (Stephan, 1994) The Cossack’s entrance into the Siberian realm had unexpected consequences, both for the Cossacks and for the aboriginal people of Siberia. The newly “discovered” aboriginal people, or in the rhetoric of the early 17th through 20th centuries, the “aliens”, were incorporated into the Russian Empire as “subjects” of the Czar. Since that time, the relationship between the government in Moscow and the government in other parts of the empire has been marked by a center-periphery dichotomy. Thus, the Siberian “periphery” and its numerous peoples were seen as “uncivilized,” and their age old traditions were labeled “backward.” For the aboriginal people of Siberia, the arrival of the Cossacks and various other settler groups brought about changes in the structure of their traditional societies. The analysis of the documents (Shenk and Kazin, 1912; Kozulin, 1991; Zabaikalskoe Kazachestvo, 1991; Zuev, 1994; Kasyanov, 2003; and Kazachii Vestnik, 2004) which became available during my fieldwork suggests that the Cossacks played a significant role in the settlement and development of Siberia. This can be gleaned, first, from the analysis of the functions, at times contradictory, which the Cossack people carried out, and secondly, from their settlement patterns. The multifunctional character of the services the Cossacks provided in Siberia included the following activities which have not been widely discussed in post-Imperial public and scholarly discourses. The Cossacks of Siberia: 1. kept the civil order in new settlements in Siberia (Shenk and Kazin, 1912); 2. protected silver and gold mines, factories, shops and warehouses (Kozulin, 1991); 32 33 The Cossacks of Siberia 3. suppressed spots of internal unrest; 4. were involved in the agricultural cycle in farming and tillage (Zuev, 1994); 5. convoyed trade expeditions (Zabaikalskoe Kazachestvo, 1991); 6. convoyed religious missions to China (Zuev, 1994); 7. worked as laborers and construction workers; 8. were involved in research expeditions and the secret service (Stephan, 1994); 9. convoyed fugitives, deportees and political prisoners, especially the Old Believers (Bolonev, 2001); and 10. acted as go-between interpreters. As a political tool, the Cossacks provided a link between the interests of the government in Moscow and the aboriginal peoples of Siberia. Another important niche which the Cossacks occupied in the Siberian realm was land ownership and cattle breeding. From the time of their settlement, the Cossacks, as frontier guards, received payment from the Czarist government. Initially the payment was done in money, pelts and forage. However, through the course of centuries, chunks of ‘‘empty’’ land became the major system of payment for their service as frontier guards. The government legally empowered the Cossacks to explore and occupy lands suitable for agriculture free of tax. Individual Cossacks had land possessions. However, their lands were considered to be the property of the whole Cossack regiment. (Shenk and Kazin,1912) Thus, by the end of the 19th century, the Cossacks of Siberia, along with the Russian Orthodox Church, were the biggest land owners in Siberia. (Zuev, 1994) The second factor that provides us a link to understanding the role of the Cossacks in Siberia is the complexity of their settlements.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin Struggle for Independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 1-1-1967 The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649. Andrew B. Pernal University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Pernal, Andrew B., "The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649." (1967). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 6490. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/6490 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. THE ROLE OF BOHDAN KHMELNYTSKYI AND OF THE KOZAKS IN THE RUSIN STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE FROM THE POLISH-LI'THUANIAN COMMONWEALTH: 1648-1649 by A ‘n d r e w B. Pernal, B. A. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History of the University of Windsor in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Graduate Studies 1967 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS the History of Siberia: from Russian Conquest to Revolution. Edited and Introduced by Alan Wood
    BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS The History of Siberia: From Russian Conquest to Revolution. Edited and introduced by Alan Wood. London: Routledge, 1991. xiv, 192 pp. $49.95. This little book is the third volume of essays on Siberia emerging from the British Universities Siberian Studies Seminar founded at Lancaster University in 1981. Its title is something of a misnomer for it is not a history of Siberia continuously from conquest to revolution, but a collection of es- says devoted to particular aspects of the development of Siberia from the late sixteenth to the early twentieth century. No single-volume compre- hensive history of Siberia yet exists. Aware that Siberia is not just a land of a harsh and extremely cold climate and that its history is more than an ac- count of criminality generated by the exile system, the editor sees as the thrust of the essays the transformation of Siberia the colony into an integral partof the Russian state. The editor's "Introduction: Siberia's role in Russian history," is a well-informed statement setting the background for the essays which fol- low and challenging the negative view of Siberia held by many as an in- hospitable land peopled by political dissidents and criminals. Basil Dmytryshyn's essay, "The administrative apparatus of the Russian colony in Siberia and northern Asia, 1581-1700," provides a comprehensive description of that apparatus and at the same time notes the factors facili- tating the conquest of Siberia, which, he paints out, developed opportunisti - cally. David N. Collins' companion essay, "Subjugation and settlement in seventeenth and eighteenth century Siberia," describes the conquest of the native population, the factors facilitating it, and the beginnings of Russians settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • 1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate
    A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Washington, DC December 17, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Andrew Robarts All Rights Reserved ii A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Dissertation Advisor: Catherine Evtuhov, Ph. D. ABSTRACT Based upon a reading of Ottoman, Russian, and Bulgarian archival documents, this dissertation examines the response by the Ottoman and Russian states to the accelerated pace of migration and spread of disease in the Black Sea region from the outbreak of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1768-1774 to the signing of the Treaty of Hünkar Iskelesi in 1833. Building upon introductory chapters on the Russian-Ottoman Black Sea frontier and a case study of Bulgarian population movements between the Russian and Ottoman Empires, this dissertation analyzes Russian and Ottoman migration and settlement policies, the spread of epidemic diseases (plague and cholera) in the Black Sea region, the construction of quarantines and the implementation of travel document regimes. The role and position of the Danubian Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia as the “middle ground” between the Ottoman and Russian Empires
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Ukraine Advisory Board
    THE HISTORY OF UKRAINE ADVISORY BOARD John T. Alexander Professor of History and Russian and European Studies, University of Kansas Robert A. Divine George W. Littlefield Professor in American History Emeritus, University of Texas at Austin John V. Lombardi Professor of History, University of Florida THE HISTORY OF UKRAINE Paul Kubicek The Greenwood Histories of the Modern Nations Frank W. Thackeray and John E. Findling, Series Editors Greenwood Press Westport, Connecticut • London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kubicek, Paul. The history of Ukraine / Paul Kubicek. p. cm. — (The Greenwood histories of the modern nations, ISSN 1096 –2095) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978 – 0 –313 – 34920 –1 (alk. paper) 1. Ukraine —History. I. Title. DK508.51.K825 2008 947.7— dc22 2008026717 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright © 2008 by Paul Kubicek All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2008026717 ISBN: 978– 0– 313 – 34920 –1 ISSN: 1096 –2905 First published in 2008 Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.greenwood.com Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48 –1984). 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Every reasonable effort has been made to trace the owners of copyright materials in this book, but in some instances this has proven impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • NARRATING the NATIONAL FUTURE: the COSSACKS in UKRAINIAN and RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK a DISSERTATION Prese
    NARRATING THE NATIONAL FUTURE: THE COSSACKS IN UKRAINIAN AND RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Comparative Literature and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2017 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Anna Kovalchuk Title: Narrating the National Future: The Cossacks in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic Literature This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Comparative Literature by: Katya Hokanson Chairperson Michael Allan Core Member Serhii Plokhii Core Member Jenifer Presto Core Member Julie Hessler Institutional Representative and Scott L. Pratt Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2017 ii © 2017 Anna Kovalchuk iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Anna Kovalchuk Doctor of Philosophy Department of Comparative Literature June 2017 Title: Narrating the National Future: The Cossacks in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic Literature This dissertation investigates nineteenth-century narrative representations of the Cossacks—multi-ethnic warrior communities from the historical borderlands of empire, known for military strength, pillage, and revelry—as contested historical figures in modern identity politics. Rather than projecting today’s political borders into the past and proceeding from the claim that the Cossacks are either Russian or Ukrainian, this comparative project analyzes the nineteenth-century narratives that transform pre- national Cossack history into national patrimony. Following the Romantic era debates about national identity in the Russian empire, during which the Cossacks become part of both Ukrainian and Russian national self-definition, this dissertation focuses on the role of historical narrative in these burgeoning political projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Ilya Repin and the Zaporozhe Cossacks
    Skidmore College Creative Matter MALS Final Projects, 1995-2019 MALS 5-17-2008 Ilya Repin and the Zaporozhe Cossacks Kristina Pavlov-Leiching Skidmore College Follow this and additional works at: https://creativematter.skidmore.edu/mals_stu_schol Part of the European History Commons, and the Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Pavlov-Leiching, Kristina, "Ilya Repin and the Zaporozhe Cossacks" (2008). MALS Final Projects, 1995-2019. 50. https://creativematter.skidmore.edu/mals_stu_schol/50 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the MALS at Creative Matter. It has been accepted for inclusion in MALS Final Projects, 1995-2019 by an authorized administrator of Creative Matter. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ilya Repin and the Zaporozhe Cossacks by Kristina Pavlov-Leiching FINAL PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN LIBERAL STUDIES SKIDMORE COLLEGE May 2008 Advisors: Kate Graney, Ken Klotz THE MASTER OF ARTS PROGRAM IN LIBERAL STUDIES SKIDMORE COLLEGE CONTENTS ABSTRACT . .. .. iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . v Chapter INTRODUCTION . .. .. .. 1. Goals of the Study 1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND . .. .. .. 3. Repin and the Academy of Arts in St. Petersburg Repin's Experiences Abroad Repin and the Wanderers Association Repin as a Teacher and Reformer Repin's Final Years 2. REPIN'S AESTHETIC BELIEFS AS AN ARTIST AND TEACHER . .................................. 15. An Artist Driven by Social Obligation A Painter of the Peasantry and Revolutionary A Devout Nationalist An Advocate of Art forAr t's Sake(1873-1876 & 1890s) Impressionist Influence An Encounter with Tolstoy's Aesthetics Repin as a Teacher and Reformer of the Academy The Importance of the Creative Process A Return to National Realism 11 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine and Russia in Their Historical Encounter
    Hans-Joachim Torke The Unloved Alliance: Political Relations between Muscovy and Ukraine in the Seventeenth Century The manifold relations between Russia and Ukraine in the seventeenth cen¬ tury were played out on at least three levels: official relations on the political, diplomatic and military level; semi-official relations in the ecclesiastical- pedagogical and commercial sectors; and unofficial relations concerned with spiritual and cultural influences. Both the latter complexes are related to the first and cannot be disregarded here, although this article focuses on political events and on the way in which they were understood by decision-makers. My purpose here is not to employ well-known and frequently consulted sources in order to elicit yet another interpretation of the Pereiaslav Agreement of 1654 or the character of relations between Muscovy and the Hetmanate in the ensuing period. Concerning Pereiaslav, there exist at least seven different interpretations (temporary alliance, personal union, real union, vassalage, protectorate, autonomy and incorporation), and in regard to the second topic, there is also a range of interpretations from full independence to complete in¬ corporation of the Cossack state. No Western scholar has yet written an account that goes beyond O’Brien’s monograph to take in the whole century.1 The question remains whether the period from the first contacts of the Dnieper Cossacks with Muscovy in the sixteenth century to the end of the Great Northern War in 1721, examined as a whole, yields a perspective on Muscovite policy that can be reconciled with the formula “Russian Imperialism from Ivan the Great to the Revolution.”2 It may be recalled that the historical roots of Russian imperialism were discussed in the American Slavic and East European Review in the early 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Place-Names of 'Hidden' Or 'Indirect' Scottish Origin
    Russian place-names of ‘hidden’ or ‘indirect’ Scottish origin (the case of Hamilton – Khomutov) Alexander Pavlenko and Galina Pavlenko In Russia there are numerous toponyms going back to personal or place names of western European origins. This phenomenon resulted from several waves of massive immigration from the West, first to Muscovite Rus’ and later, in greater numbers, to the Russian Empire. Among the immigrants, most of whom originated from Germany, there was quite a number of Scotsmen – active participants in all the major historical events in both Western and Eastern Europe. The first Scotsmen in Russia, called Shkotskie Nemtsy (literally ‘Scottish Germans’) by locals, belonged to the military class and came to this country either as mercenaries or prisoners of war in the late sixteenth century in the reign of Ivan the Terrible. Most of them were captured during the Livonian War and continued their military service in the Russian troops (Anderson 1990: 37). In the seventeenth century with the accession of the Romanovs dynasty to the throne, Scotsmen started to arrive in Russia in ever increasing numbers. Some of those who abandoned their motherland, driven by circumstances managed to inscribe their names in Russian history as prominent soldiers, engineers, doctors, architects, etc. Scottish mercenaries and adventurers considered the remote Russian lands to be a place where they could build their career and hopefully make a fortune. Of course, as is well known, Russia was only one of a multitude of destinations which Scotsmen sought to reach. The late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries saw a more abundant influx of Scots due to the Petrine reforms and a high demand for foreign professionals in all fields (Dukes 1987: 9–23; Cross 1987: 24–46).
    [Show full text]
  • Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500-1700
    Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700 In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries Muscovy waged a costly struggle against the Crimean Khanate, the Ottoman Empire, and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth for control of the fertile steppe above the Black Sea. This was a region of great strategic and economic importance – arguably the pivot of Eurasia at the time. Yet, this crucial period in Russia’s history has, up until now, been neglected by historians. Brian L. Davies’s study provides an essential insight into the emergence of Russia as a great power. The long campaign took a great toll upon Russia’s population, economy, and institutions, and repeatedly frustrated or redefi ned Russian military and diplo- matic projects in the West. The struggle was every bit as important as Russia’s wars in northern and central Europe for driving the Russian state-building process, forcing military reform and shaping Russia’s visions of Empire. Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700 examines the course of this struggle and explains how Russia’s ultimate prevalence resulted from new strategies of military colonization in addition to improvements in army command-and-control, logistics, and tactics. Brian L. Davies is Associate Professor of History at the University of Texas at San Antonio. His publications include State Power and Community in Early Modern Russia: The Case of Kozlov, 1635–1649 (2004). Warfare and History General Editor Jeremy Black Professor of History, University of Exeter Air Power in the Age of Total War Modern Chinese Warfare, Warfare in Atlantic Africa, 1500– John Buckley 1795–1989 1800: Maritime Confl icts and the Bruce A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Ethnicity in Southern Bessarabia: Tracing the Histories Of
    The Making of Ethnicity in Southern Bessarabia: Tracing the histories of an ambiguous concept in a contested land Dissertation Zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt der Philosophischen Fakultät I Sozialwissenschaften und historische Kulturwissenschaften der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, von Herrn Simon Schlegel geb. am 23. April 1983 in Rorschach (Schweiz) Datum der Verteidigung 26. Mai 2016 Gutachter: PD Dr. phil. habil. Dittmar Schorkowitz, Dr. Deema Kaneff, Prof. Dr. Gabriela Lehmann-Carli Contents Deutsche Zusammenfassung ...................................................................................................................................... iii 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Questions and hypotheses ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. History and anthropology, some methodological implications ................................................. 6 1.3. Locating the field site and choosing a name for it ........................................................................ 11 1.4. A brief historical outline .......................................................................................................................... 17 1.5. Ethnicity, natsional’nost’, and nationality: definitions and translations ............................
    [Show full text]
  • from Ancient Rome to the American War of Independence
    : From Ancient Rome to the American War of Independence and Press Release Monday 19 October 2015 H. G. Wells A Short History of the World In Three Volumes. Illustrated. Edited by George Sandulescu and Lidia Vianu Contemporary Literature Press is Contemporary Literature Press publishing a book about the past, publică acum o carte despre trecut, written by a visionary writer who, scrisă de un vizionar care, împreună cu along with Jules Verne, is considered Jules Verne, este considerat a fi creat to be the father of science fiction. genul science fiction. H. G. Wells’s Short History of the Scurtă istorie a lumii a fost World was published in 1922, the peak publicată de H.G. Wells în anul 1922, year of Modernism—the year when anul modernist prin excelenţă, având în James Joyce’s Ulyssses and T.S. Eliot’s vedere că exact atunci au apărut Ulysses The Waste Land appeared. Its author de James Joyce şi The Waste Land de T.S. was a novelist who also wrote books Eliot. Autorul acestui volum de istorie a about the future, such as The Time scris şi cărţi despre viitor, cum ar fi Machine, The Invisible Man, The First Maşina timpului, Omul invizibil, Primii Men in the Moon. Partly, the scientific oameni pe lună. Unele descoperiri and technical future imagined by ştiinţifice şi tehnice imaginate de Wells Wells at the beginnig of the 20th la începutul secolului XX chiar au fost Century has already happened. ulterior făcute cu adevărat. This clearly written and amply Cartea aceasta scrisă limpede şi illustrated book provides both bogat ilustrată aduce, pentru profesori teachers and students with possible şi elevii lor, tot felul de istorii despre stories about life on earth.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIAN COSSACKS Fact Sheet
    RUSSIAN COSSACKS Fact Sheet Russian Cossacks in the Service of the German Reich – 1941 to 1945 During the summer of 1941, numerous Red Army soldiers, prisoners and deserters, joined the ranks of the German Army to fight in the war against the Soviet Union and Stalin. With various motives, often ideological, these men were formed into a multiplicity of smaller units spread all over the eastern front. Their numbers continued to grow from 1941 through 1944. Among these volunteers were the Russian Cossacks led by their Atamans, (chiefs). They enjoyed a certain historical independence which originated from within the confines of the Russian Imperial Armies of the Czars whose task it was to guard the vast frontiers of the Russian empire. During the Russian Civil War, (The Bolshevik Revolution - 1917 to 1923) a majority of the Cossacks fought on the side of the White Russians, (those allied with the Czar and opposed to the communists). During the 1920’s and 30’s, they were defeated by the Bolsheviks, persecuted by Stalin and deprived of their land and liberties. In the summer of 1942, the arrival of German military forces in the Cossack regions of Russia, (southern Russia and the Caucasus) were regarded by the Cossacks as an unexpected chance to topple the communist regime and regain their ancient rights. The great wave of Cossack recruitment took place that summer when General von Kleist’s First Panzer Army penetrated into the Cossack lands. As soon as the Germans arrived in the Southern Russian regions of the Don, Kuban and Terek, numerous Cossacks presented themselves spontaneously to German units with great enthusiasm.
    [Show full text]