DOCSLIB.ORG

USAID Land Tenure and Property Rights Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
USAID Land Tenure and Property Rights Framework LAND TENURE AND PROPERTY RIGHTS FRAMEWORK SEPTEMBER 2013 This tool was prepared by Tetra Tech on behalf of USAID, under the Property Rights and Resource Governance Program under the Prosperity, Livelihoods and Critical Ecosystems (PLACE) Indefinite Quantity Contract (IQC) Contract No. EPP-I-00-06-00008-00, Task Order 002. For more information on this tool, please contact: Dr. Gregory Myers, Division Chief, Land Tenure and Property Rights, E3/LTRM, USAID, [email protected]. Dr. Mark Freudenberger, Senior Technical Advisor/Manager, Property Rights and Resource Governance Program, Tetra Tech, [email protected]. LAND TENURE AND PROPERTY RIGHTS FRAMEWORK SEPTEMBER 2013 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................... III 1.0 PREFACE ................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 A FRAMEWORK FOR LAND TENURE AND PROPERTY RIGHTS ........................ 5 2.1 LTPR FRAMEWORK AND TOOLS ............................................................................ 5 2.2 LAND TENURE AND PROPERTY RIGHTS ........................................................ 5 2.3 RELEVANCE OF LTPR TO USAID BUREAU AND MISSION PROGRAMMING ........................................................................................................ 8 3.0 OVERARCHING THEMES FOR LAND TENURE AND PROPERTY RIGHTS ..... 11 3.1 UNDERSTANDING THE EVOLUTION OF LAND TENURE AND PROPERTY RIGHTS ................................................................................................. 11 3.2 RESOURCE TENURE IN KEY US GOVERNMENT STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................... 12 3.2.1 PROPERTY RIGHTS, FOOD SECURITY, AND REDUCING HUNGER ......................................................................................................... 12 3.2.2 PROPERTY RIGHTS, ECONOMIC GROWTH, INVESTMENT, AND LAND MARKETS ............................................................................... 14 3.2.3 PROPERTY RIGHTS AND DEMOCRATIC LAND GOVERNANCE ............................................................................................. 16 3.2.4 PROPERTY RIGHTS, CONFLICT, AND INSTABILITY...................... 17 3.2.5 PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THE CHALLENGE OF GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE ..................................................................................... 18 3.2.6 PROPERTY RIGHTS, NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND BIODIVERSITY ................................................................................... 19 3.2.7 PROPERTY RIGHTS AND ENHANCING WOMEN’S ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT ......................................................................................... 21 3.2.8 PROPERTY RIGHTS, GLOBAL HEALTH, POVERTY, AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES .............................................................................. 21 3.2.9 PROPERTY RIGHTS, INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, AND MINORITIES ................................................................................................... 22 3.2.10 PROPERTY RIGHTS AND POST-DISASTER RESPONSE AND RECOVERY ..................................................................................................... 23 3.3 SECURING RESOURCE RIGHTS AND IMPROVING RESOURCE GOVERNANCE ......................................................................................................... 24 3.3.1 SECURING RESOURCE RIGHTS ............................................................. 24 3.3.2 POLICY AND LAW ..................................................................................... 24 3.3.3 INSTITUTION BUILDING AND INFORMATION DISSEMINATION .......................................................................................... 25 3.3.4 PARTICIPATORY LAND AND RESOURCE PLANNING ................. 26 LAND TENURE AND PROPERTY RIGHTS FRAMEWORK i 4.0 LTPR MATRIX: A TOOL FOR VISUALIZING THE LTPR UNIVERSE .................... 27 4.1 LTPR MATRIX ............................................................................................................ 27 4.2 MATRIX OVERLAYS ................................................................................................ 28 4.3 CATEGORIES OF LTPR CONSTRAINTS .......................................................... 30 4.4 LTPR INTERVENTIONS .......................................................................................... 31 4.5 CROSSCUTTING THEMES .................................................................................... 35 4.6 USING THE MATRIX............................................................................................... 36 5.0 METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING LTPR CONSTRAINTS AND INTERVENTIONS ................................................................................................................. 37 5.1 LAND TENURE AND PROPERTY RIGHTS MATRIX .................................... 38 5.2 COUNTRY PROFILES ............................................................................................. 39 5.3 SITUATION ASSESSMENT AND INTERVENTION PLANNING TOOL .. 39 5.4 IMPACT EVALUATION TOOL ............................................................................ 40 6.0 LTPR INTERVENTIONS AND SEQUENCING ............................................................ 41 6.1 SEQUENCING=CONTENT, SCALE, TIMING, AND ORDERING ............ 41 6.2 WHEN TO CONSIDER SEQUENCING ............................................................ 41 6.3 WELL-FORMED OBJECTIVES WILL DRIVE SEQUENCING ........................ 41 6.4 SUSTAINING RESULTS AND SEQUENCING OF LTPR INTERVENTIONS ..................................................................................................... 42 6.5 SEQUENCING TOOLS AND MAXIMS .............................................................. 43 7.0 LTPR TRAINING ................................................................................................................... 45 7.1 LTPR TRAINING AUDIENCES, METHODS, AND MATERIALS ................. 45 8.0 LTPR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT ........................................................................... 47 ANNEX A: CATEGORIES OF LTPR CONSTRAINTS AND INTERVENTIONS COMPRISING THE MATRIX ............................................................................................. 49 ANNEX B: MATRIX OVERLAY SUMMARY TABLES ............................................................. 63 ANNEX C: GLOSSARY OF COMMON LAND AND LAND TENURE TERMS ............. 85 SOURCES ................................................................................................................................ 98 ii LAND TENURE AND PROPERTY RIGHTS FRAMEWORK ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AusAID Australian Agency for International Development BASIS Broadening Access and Strengthening Input Systems DFID UK Department for International Development ENR Environment and Natural Resources FAO United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization GLUT Gaining with Land Use Transactions GTZ German Technical Cooperation Agency (now GIZ) HIV/AIDS Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome IDP Internally Displaced Person IIED International Institute for Environment and Development IQC Indefinite Quantity Contract KM Knowledge Management LAG Land Administration Guidelines LTC University of Wisconsin Land Tenure Center LTD Land Tenure and Property Rights Division LTPR Land Tenure and Property Rights OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development PLACE Prosperity, Livelihoods, and Conserving Ecosystems PRRGP Property Rights and Resource Governance Program RAISE Rural and Agricultural Incomes with a Sustainable Environment SAIP Situation Assessment and Intervention Planning Tool TO Task Order UNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe USAID United States Agency for International Development USG United States Government LAND TENURE AND PROPERTY RIGHTS FRAMEWORK iii 1.0 PREFACE Resource tenure and property rights challenges are present in almost every country where the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) works. In many countries, tenure and property rights problems are so grave that they create political instability, violence, population displacement, famine, and environmental destruction, which significantly undermine or prevent successful implementation of many USAID programs. Over the last decade, the demand to address property rights issues has increased from both USAID field missions and host country governments. The increase in demand is due, in part, to a growing awareness among development practitioners of the role played by property rights (and natural resource access and use) in economic growth, governance, and conflict and resource management. USAID and its partners have learned a great deal over the last three decades about the relationship between property rights and economic growth, productivity, and to a lesser extent, natural resource management and conflict. There are several important lessons learned from the last decade of research and policy work on property rights with a particular emphasis on land and resource tenure. 1. Land tenure and property rights (LTPR) systems are fundamental to a wide variety of development outcomes. Secure land tenure improves food security, economic growth, and natural resource management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Farmland Investments and Water Rights: the Legal Regimes at Stake
    Farmland Investments and Water Rights: The legal regimes at stake Makane Moïse Mbengue Susanna Waltman May 2015 www.iisd.org/gsi www.iisd.org © 2015 The International Institute for Sustainable Development Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development. International Institute for Sustainable Development The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change and energy, and management of natural and social capital, as well as the enabling role of communication technologies in these areas. We report on international negotiations and disseminate knowledge gained through collaborative projects, resulting in more rigorous research, capacity building in developing countries, better networks spanning the North and the South, and better global connections among researchers, practitioners, citizens and policy-makers. IISD’s vision is better living for all—sustainably; its mission is to champion innovation, enabling societies to live sustainably. IISD is registered as a charitable organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD receives core operating support from the Government of Canada, provided through the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), from the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and from the Province of Manitoba. The Institute receives project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies,
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Land Contract Guide Important Disclaimer: The
    Michigan Land Contract Guide Important Disclaimer: The information in this guide is meant to be educational and general in nature. It does not replace the advice of an attorney. Why a Land Contract Guide Now? One of the impacts of the foreclosure crisis has been the increase in the use of land contracts as a way to buy or sell a home. A land contract can provide a way for a homebuyer who cannot qualify for conventional financing to purchase a home. It can also provide a way for seller to be more likely to sell a home and sell it at a price closer to its perceived value than an appraisal would reflect. While a land contract can be a viable and valuable alternative to traditional financing, it can also cause significant problems for both buyers and sellers who do not understand the basics and who enter into a poorly crafted contract. The purpose of this guide is to provide those basics and a check list of those considerations and provisions that make for a well-crafted Land Contract in the state of Michigan. It does not replace the advice of an attorney. What is a Land Contract? A land contract is an agreement between a buyer and a seller that states the buyer is purchasing property but will not receive the legal title until the debt has been satisfied. Land contracts are a form of seller financing and are typically used in real estate transactions, usually residential, when a buyer cannot secure traditional means of financing . Unlike a mortgage, a land contract stipulates that if a buyer does not fulfill his financial obligations in the agreed upon terms of the contract, then the seller regains possession of the property and keeps whatever money the buyer has remitted.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND TENURE and RIGHTS for Improved Land Management and Sustainable Development
    GLOBAL LAND OUTLOOK WORKING PAPER LAND TENURE AND RIGHTS for Improved Land Management and Sustainable Development Prof. Emmanuel Kasimbazi September 2017 DISCLAIMER The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by UNCCD in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the authors or contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNCCD. CONTENTS Acronyms 03 Executive Summary 04 1. General Introduction 06 1.1 Introduction 06 1.2 Objectives and Scope of the Paper 06 1.3 Structure of the Paper 07 2. Context and Background 07 3. Land Tenure Systems 08 3.1 Definition of the term land tenure 08 3.2 Types of Tenure 08 4. Land Policy and Regulatory Framework 11 5. Land Rights and Gender 14 6. Customary Land Rights 15 7. Land Administration and Institutions 15 7.1 Institutions at the international level 16 7.2 Institutions at the regional level 16 7.3 Institutions at National level 16 8. Land Registration and Titling Systems 18 9. Sustainable Land Management 19 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Installment Land Contracts: Developing Law in Virginia
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 37 | Issue 4 Article 8 Fall 9-1-1980 Installment Land Contracts: Developing Law in Virginia Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Property Law and Real Estate Commons, and the Secured Transactions Commons Recommended Citation Installment Land Contracts: Developing Law in Virginia, 37 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1161 (1980), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol37/iss4/8 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Notes INSTALLMENT LAND CONTRACTS: DEVELOPING LAW IN VIRGINIA An installment land sale contract1 is a method of seller financing for land sales. The land contract, sometimes referred to as a "contract for deed" or "longterm contract," functions as a substitute for a mortgage or deed of trust.2 Generally, in a mortgage, the seller conveys title to the property, and the buyer obtains financing by pledging the property as security for the purchase price of the land.3 The mortgagee has a lien on the buyer's title.4 In a deed of trust transaction, the buyer conveys title to the property to a third party to hold as trustee during the period of in- debtedness. 5 In a land contract, the seller finances the land sale retaining legal title to the property until the buyer makes the final installment payment.e Land contracts are used most often in states in which- mortgage law heavily favors the mortgagor.7 Pro-mortgagor law restricts the mortga- gee's right to enforce the lien on the property by prescribing lengthy pro- cedures for mortgage foreclosure.8 Sellers often prefer land contracts be- ' G.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Contracts Presentation FINAL
    Annette Higby, Emma Hempstead, Thomas Bell Other names: Installment Land Contract, Contract for Deed, etc. Buyer Regular Principal and Interest Payments § Usually annual § To the Seller Takes possession of property at outset of contract Seller Retains title until all payments made May retain possessory interest in some of the property Buyer Able to possess land without access to commercial credit No significant down payment Seller Simple means of transferring farmland Ease tax consequences into installments Greater pool of potential buyers Can retain a life estate in the homestead Buyer Forfeiting possession in default Forfeiting payments made in default Seller Buyer default Decline in land values Waste Bankruptcy of Buyer High risk of default, Buyer often ineligible for commercial or FSA lending Nearly all land contracts protect the Seller with a forfeiture clause If Buyer defaults on a payment they forfeit possession of property, and all payments made to date Sometimes considered a form of liquidated damages can become unreasonable, especially when buyer has: made most of the contract payments, or made significant improvements to the farm prior to default Varies greatly by jurisdiction Enforce forfeiture clause but require Seller provide brief right to cure and a right of redemption upon full payment of the contract (Maine) Restitution theory requiring Seller to return any payments beyond Seller’s actual damages Rental theory of damages Fair market value of land at time of default in relation to contract price (New Hampshire) Restatement of Property §3.4(a) regards the land contract as a mortgage, and Seller’s remedy is foreclosure. Foreclosure sale price determines duties, if in excess of the contract Buyer receives payment, if less than contract price, Seller has a right to the deficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Tenure: an Introduction
    The U.S. Congress established the East-West Center in 1960 to foster mutual understanding and coopera- tion among the governments and peoples of the Asia Pacific region including the United States. Funding for the Center comes from the U.S. govern- ment with additional support provided by private agencies, individuals, corporations, and Asian and Pacific governments. East-West Center Working Papers are circulated for comment and to inform interested colleagues about work in progress at the Center. For more information about the Center or to order publications, contact: Publication Sales Office East-West Center 1601 East-West Road Honolulu, Hawaii 96848-1601 Telephone: 808-944-7145 Facsimile: 808-944-7376 Email: [email protected] Website: www.EastWestCenter.org EAST-WEST CENTER WORKING PAPERS Economics Series No. 49, June 2002 Land Tenure: An Introduction Sumner La Croix Sumner La Croix is a Senior Fellow and Coordinator of China Research at the East-West Center, and he is Professor and Chair in the Department of Economics at the University of Hawaii. His book, Japan's New Economy: Continuity and Change in the Twenty-First Century, was published by Oxford University Press in 2001. La Croix has published numerous articles on the economic history and development of the Asia-Pacific region, with particular emphasis on intellectual property conflicts, institutional change and economic reform, the Asia-Pacific civil aviation industry, and foreign direct investment in China. Forthcoming in Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History. East-West Center Working Papers: Economics Series reports on research in progress. This paper has been peer-reviewed. The views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Tenancies and Creative Financing—The Land Contract
    University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review Volume 5 Issue 4 Article 1 1982 Joint Tenancies and Creative Financing—The Land Contract Robert Kratovil Follow this and additional works at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview Part of the Contracts Commons, and the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Robert Kratovil, Joint Tenancies and Creative Financing—The Land Contract, 5 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 475 (1982). Available at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview/vol5/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review by an authorized editor of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 5 1982 NUMBER 4 JOINT TENANCIES AND "CREATIVE FINANCING"- THE LAND CONTRACT Robert Kratovil* The drying up of institutional mortgage money in recent years has resulted in a burgeoning of "creative financing" of home sales. Newspaper advertisements often seek to attract buyers by stating that "owner financing is available" or that the "mortgage is assuma- ble."' Another form of "creative financing" is the installment con- tract, which is commonplace in jurisdictions in which the simplified forfeiture process offers a quick and inexpensive means of extin- guishing the rights of a defaulting purchaser.2 Many of the homes financed by this method are owned by a husband and wife in joint tenancy.3 A question that will therefore recur is what effect the exe- cution of an installment contract by the joint tenants will have on an existing joint tenancy.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Land Tenure?
    Land Tenure and Property Rights Concepts and Terminology Presenter: John Bruce Property Rights and Resource Governance Issues and Best Practices Washington, DC October 2012 Land in the News Delegates And Government Clash On Rwanda: Land Customary Land Registration Complete What's Behind International Land Grabs? Families in Kacyiru, Zimbabwe land reform 'not Kimicanga Areas to a failure' Be Expropriated 2 Objectives 1. Introduce some fundamental concepts and terms used in the course concerning both issues and interventions in land tenure systems 2. Provide participants with a shared vocabulary of land tenure and property rights 3. Identify a few common confusions in the use of key terms which can lead to miscommunication in policy discussions 3 What is land tenure? 1. Land Tenure and Real Property 2. What’s the point of property rights in land? . Avoiding a free-for-all . Reducing risks and creating incentives . Allowing land to move among users . Creating capital - land is a financial asset 4 What is tenure—A bundle of rights 5 What are some basic tenures? 1. Tenures are characterized in terms of: . Type of right: ownership (freehold), tenancy (leasehold), usufruct (use right), concession, license . Holder: individual (private), state (public), community (common) 2. Tenures are not made in Heaven but are created by law 6 Property regimes . Individual property: Strands of property bundle are held by a natural or legal person . Community property: Strands are shared among members of a community or association . Public (or state) property: Strands are concentrated, held and managed by the government . Terra nullius: Land to belongs to no one.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commons and Customary Law in Modern Times: Rethinking the Orthodoxies
    UNDP-International Land Coalition Workshop: Land Rights for African Development: From Knowledge to Action Nairobi, October 31 – November 3, 2005 (Proceedings: http://www.undp.org/drylands/lt-workshop-11-05.htm) The Commons and Customary Law in Modern Times: Rethinking the Orthodoxies Liz Alden Wily Independent Consultant Land Tenure Adviser [email protected] INTRODUCTION Let me first lay out my position from the outset - 1. Conceptual confusion still blights ideas of the commons. It is necessary to draw a distinction between territories over which communities customarily exercise domain (Communal Domain) and tangible real estate, those properties within those domains which are the private group-owned property of all members of a community of persons, and which are held (for good reasons) in undivided shares. These are Common Properties. 2. It is my view that individually-held properties have been and still are - despite the last decade of reforms - the wrong target for rural tenure registration and collateralization in agrarian conditions. 3. Priority focus should be upon the rural commons. It is these estates, not the family farm or house, which always have been, and remain today at most risk from involuntary loss. It is these community-owned properties to which governments throughout the continent have so consistently helped themselves and/or reallocate to others and which still bear the status in over half of African States as de facto un-owned or public land. These losses continue right up until the present.1 Moreover these losses directly affect the poor. For even the poorest members of rural communities, those without land or too little land to live on (the ‘land poor’) share the customary ownership of these estates with other, richer members of the community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basics of Land Contracts
    The Basics of Land Contracts What is a Land Contract? A land contract is a written legal contract or agreement that is used to purchase real estate, such as vacant land, a house, an apartment building, a commercial building, or other real property. A land contract is a form of seller financing that is similar to a mortgage. But, rather than borrowing money from a lender or bank to buy real estate, the buyer makes payments to the real estate owner, or seller, until the purchase price is paid in full. A buyer and a seller both sign the land contract covering the agreed upon terms and conditions of the sale. Upon satisfaction of all contract terms and conditions, including payment of the purchase price over a specified time period, the legal title of the property transfers from the seller to the buyer by way of a warranty deed or other deed used to convey title. Why Are Land Contracts Used? As with other types of seller financing, a land contract may be beneficial for both the buyer and the seller. Benefits to buyers. There may be a buyer interested in the real estate for sale but, because of their credit history or other reasons, they cannot obtain approval for the mortgage they need. The parties can enter into a sale by land contract so that the buyer makes monthly payments directly to the seller. Benefits to sellers. The seller does not receive the full purchase price up front, like the seller would if the buyer used a mortgage or paid all cash, but the seller may have more options for potential buyers.
    [Show full text]
  • Enclosures As a Land Management Tool for Food Security in African Drylands
    Journal of Land Use Science ISSN: 1747-423X (Print) 1747-4248 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tlus20 Enclosures as a land management tool for food security in African drylands Gert Nyberg, Stephen M. Mureithi, Deborah N. Muricho & Madelene Ostwald To cite this article: Gert Nyberg, Stephen M. Mureithi, Deborah N. Muricho & Madelene Ostwald (2019) Enclosures as a land management tool for food security in African drylands, Journal of Land Use Science, 14:1, 110-121, DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2019.1636147 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2019.1636147 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. View supplementary material Published online: 30 Jun 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 179 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tlus20 JOURNAL OF LAND USE SCIENCE 2019, VOL. 14, NO. 1, 110–121 https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2019.1636147 Enclosures as a land management tool for food security in African drylands Gert Nyberga, Stephen M. Mureithib, Deborah N. Murichob and Madelene Ostwaldc,d,e aDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden; bDepartment of Land Resource Management and Agricultural Technology (LARMAT), University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya; cCentre for Environment and Sustainability (GMV), University of Gothenburg/Chalmers University
    [Show full text]
  • Land Tenure: Lessons for Sustainability Through Information Sharing
    LandTenureEng 6/1/06 2:35 PM Page 2 ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES DEPARTMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEPARTMENT POLICY SERIES, NUMBER 10 — APRIL 2006 Land Tenure: Lessons for Sustainability Through Information Sharing Despite so many efforts to reform aspects of property rights, ■ Conflicts over land and lack of adequate land dispute to regularize land registration of rural and urban land and to resolution mechanisms. modernize land registration systems, a lot still remains to be done ■ Resistance by political and economic interest groups. to address the needs of marginalized groups, especially women, ■ Non-implementation of existing laws and lack of a legal indigenous peoples and poor rural farmers who are denied framework for pursuing reforms. basics rights over land. By creating systems and networks within which practical information and experiences can be shared, Governments spend a considerable governments will be able to use the best regulations, options amount of time and effort managing, and practices available to reform aspects of property rights. planning and securing property. Each of these functions is run by a myriad of LAND POLICY ISSUES IN LATIN separate agencies creating difficulties in AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN (LAC) registering a property. Data from the Latin America has, on average, the most inequitable distribution Doing Business report show that the of land. The magnitude of land distribution inequality meas- number of days on average to register ured by the Gini coefficient of land distribution goes from 0.55 a property in LAC is 76.5 while in the to 0.94 resulting that in the 1970s and 1980s it was possible to OECD countries takes on average about find countries where 6% of the population controlled all the 32 days.
    [Show full text]