DOCSLIB.ORG

Nationality Policies in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nationality Policies in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan A NATIONALITY POLICIES IN POST-SOVIET KAZAKHSTAN A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY DENİZ DİNÇ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF EURASIAN STUDIES SEPTEMBER 2010 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences _______________________ Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. _______________________ Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı Head of the Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts _______________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mustafa Şen Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mustafa Şen (METU, SOC) ___________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Ayça Ergun Özbolat (METU, SOC) ___________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Işık Kuşçu Bonnenfant (METU, IR) ___________ I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Signature: iii ABSTRACT NATIONALITY POLICIES IN POST-SOVIET KAZAKHSTAN Dinç, Deniz M.A., Eurasian Studies Supervisor : Assoc. Dr. Mustafa Şen September 2010, 141 pages This thesis attempts to analyze the continuity of nationality policies of Kazakhstan between Soviet and post-Soviet periods. As for the Soviet past the Soviet template of nationality policies was deeply rooted in Kazakhstan. Considering the Soviet template of nationality policies, this study conceptualizes the structure of it as first among equals under Russian hegemony. With regard to post-Soviet period, this thesis claims that the nation building policies were not born out of its ashes contrary to the mainstream arguments. This study aims to reveal how the post-Soviet nation building in Kazakhstan is still proceeding along with the Soviet template. Evaluating nation building process of independent Kazakhstan, this study emphasizes the rising titular hegemony of Kazakhs. In other words, this study attempts to analyze the transformation of first among equals taking into account the ethnic and civic aspects of nation-building oscillations. Keywords: Nation building, Central Asia, Kazakhstan, Nationalism, Soviet Union iv ÖZ SOVYET SONRASI KAZAKİSTAN’DA ULUS POLİTİKALARI Dinç, Deniz Yüksek Lisans, Avrasya Çalışmaları Tez Yöneticisi : Doç. Dr. Mustafa Şen Eylül 2010, 141 sayfa Bu tez Kazakistan’ın ulus politikalarındaki sürekliliğini Sovyet ve Sovyet sonrasi dönemler arasında analiz etmeye çalışmaktadır. Sovyet geçmişine baktığımızda, Sovyet şablonu ulus politikaları Kazakistan’da derince kök salmıştır. Sovyet şablonu ulus politikalarını düşününce bu çalışma, ulus politikalarının şablonunun yapısını Rus hegemonyası altında eşitler arası birinci olarak kavramsallaştırır. Sovyet sonrası dönemle ilgili olarak, ana akım argümanların aksine ulus inşa polikaları küllerinden doğmamıştır. Bu çalışma Sovyet sonrası dönemde Kazakistan’daki ulus inşasının Sovyet şablonuyla birlikte nasıl ilerlediğini aydınlatmayı amaçlar. Bağımsız Kazakistan’ın ulus inşa sürecini değerlendirirken Kazakların yükselen yerli hegemonyası vurgulanır. Başka bir deyişle, bu çalışma ulus inşa süreci salınımlarının etnik ve sivil yönlerini göz önüne alarak, eşitler arası birincinin dönüşümünü analiz etmeye çalışır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Ulus İnşası, Orta Asya, Kazakistan, Milliyetçilik, Sovyetler Birliği v To My Grandfather, Niyazi Dinç (1931-2010) vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his deepest gratitude to his supervisor Assoc. Dr. Mustafa Şen for his guidance, advice and patience. Without his guidance and tolarance it would be very difficult to finish this thesis. The author would also like to express his deepest appreciation to Assist. Prof. Ayça Ergun for her support to his academic development. The author learned new perspectives of Eurasian Studies in her courses. The author is very grateful to Assist Prof. Işık Kuşçu for her support and comments about his dissertation. The author is also very grateful to Dr. Yunus Emre Gürbüz for his encouragement, comments and history course. His contributions were very significant for the author to learn new arguments in the literature. The author would like to thank Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı, Assoc Prof. Dr. Oktay Tanrısever, Assist. Prof. Dr. Pınar Bedirhanoğlu and Assist. Prof. Dr Hayriye Kahveci for their contributions to his academic life. Finally, the author would also like to thank to his parents, brother and friends for their encouragement and motivation. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS PLAGIARISM……………………………………………………………………...İİİ ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................... İV ÖZ ............................................................................................................................... V DEDICATION………………………………………………………………………Vİ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................... Vİİ TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................ Vİİİ LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................... X LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................... Xİ LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................... Xİİ CHAPTER 1.INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 2.FORMATION OF SOVIET NATIONALITY POLICIES ....................................... 7 2.1. LEGACY OF CLASSİC MARXİST APPROACHES ON NATİONAL QUESTİON ............ 7 2.1.1. Marx and Engels on the National Question in the pre-1848 period: ..................... 9 2.1.2. Breaking point of 1848 on the Nationalism Perception of Marx and Engels ... 10 2.1.3. Considerations of Marx and Engels in the era of Post-1860’s: Irish Break ...... 11 2.2. DEBATES ON SELF DETERMINATION RIGHTS AMONG MARXISTS BEFORE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION ........................................................................................ 13 2.3. BOLSHEVIK NATIONALITY POLICIES FROM REVOLUTION TO THE STALIN ERA . 21 2.3.1. Debates on Demarcation of Borders ............................................................................. 26 2.4. SOVIET NATIONALITY POLICIES IN THE STALIN ERA: FROM NATIVIZATION TO DEPORTATIONS OF NATIONS ................................................................................... 28 2.4.1. Deportation of Nations ...................................................................................................... 32 3.IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONLITY POLICIES IN SOVIET KAZAKHSTAN ........................................................................................................ 35 3.1. THE EMERGENCE OF NATIONALIST CONSCIOUSNESS AMONG KAZAKHS .......... 35 3.1.1. Nomadic life style of Kazakhs ........................................................................................ 35 3.1.2. Russian Colonization and the Effects for Kazakhs ................................................... 38 3.1.3. The Emergence of Kazakh Intelligentsia and Alash Orda Movement ................ 41 3.2. NATION BUILDING PROCESS IN THE SOVIET KAZAKHSTAN .............................. 44 3.2.1. Nationality Policies under the NEP Era 1921-27 ...................................................... 44 viii 3.2.2. Collectivization or Liquidation of Nomadic life in Kazakhstan ........................... 46 3.2.3. Virgin Land Campaign and Nationality Policies in the Period of Khrushchev 49 3.2.4. The Rising Status of Kazakhs under the Brezhnev-Kunaev Period..................... 52 3.2.5. December Incidents of 1986: Zheltoqsan .................................................................... 54 4.THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF NATION BUILDING STRUCTURE OF POST-SOVIET KAZAKHSTAN .............................................................................. 57 4.1. NATION BUILDING THEORY .............................................................................. 57 4.2. ITEMS AND TOOLS OF NATION BUILDING ......................................................... 65 4.3. NATION BUILDING STRUCTURE OF POST-SOVIET KAZAKHSTAN ...................... 68 4.3.1. The Impact of Soviet Heritage ........................................................................................ 68 4.3.2. Oscillations of Post-Soviet Nation Building Models of Kazakhstan .................. 74 4.3.2.1. Ethno-Nationalist Nation Building .................................................... 75 4.3.2.2. Civic Nation Building, Multiple Reethnification Model and Kazakhs First Among Equals ........................................................................................ 78 5.NATION BUILDING POLICIES IN THE POST-SOVIET KAZAKHSTAN ...... 83 5.1. DEMOGRAPHIC DIVERSITY AND CITIZENSHIP ................................................... 83 5.2. LANGUAGE POLICIES ........................................................................................ 88 5.3. STATE SYMBOLS AS AN IMPORTANT MIRROR OF THE NATION BUILDING ......... 96 5.3.1. National Flag of Independent Kazakhstan .................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Selected Works of Chokan Valikhanov Selected Works of Chokan Valikhanov
    SELECTED WORKS OF CHOKAN VALIKHANOV CHOKAN OF WORKS SELECTED SELECTED WORKS OF CHOKAN VALIKHANOV Pioneering Ethnographer and Historian of the Great Steppe When Chokan Valikhanov died of tuberculosis in 1865, aged only 29, the Russian academician Nikolai Veselovsky described his short life as ‘a meteor flashing across the field of oriental studies’. Set against his remarkable output of official reports, articles and research into the history, culture and ethnology of Central Asia, and more important, his Kazakh people, it remains an entirely appropriate accolade. Born in 1835 into a wealthy and powerful Kazakh clan, he was one of the first ‘people of the steppe’ to receive a Russian education and military training. Soon after graduating from Siberian Cadet Corps at Omsk, he was taking part in reconnaissance missions deep into regions of Central Asia that had seldom been visited by outsiders. His famous mission to Kashgar in Chinese Turkestan, which began in June 1858 and lasted for more than a year, saw him in disguise as a Tashkent mer- chant, risking his life to gather vital information not just on current events, but also on the ethnic make-up, geography, flora and fauna of this unknown region. Journeys to Kuldzha, to Issyk-Kol and to other remote and unmapped places quickly established his reputation, even though he al- ways remained inorodets – an outsider to the Russian establishment. Nonetheless, he was elected to membership of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society and spent time in St Petersburg, where he was given a private audience by the Tsar. Wherever he went he made his mark, striking up strong and lasting friendships with the likes of the great Russian explorer and geographer Pyotr Petrovich Semyonov-Tian-Shansky and the writer Fyodor Dostoyevsky.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Works of Kazakh Writer Dulat Issabekov in Modern National and Global Education
    Sultanbekova , Z., Yergobek, K., Atemova, K., Koshenova, T., Yergubekova, Z. /Vol. 7 Núm. 17: 241- 252/ Noviembre - diciembre 2018 241 Artículo de investigación Role of works of kazakh writer dulat issabekov in modern national and global education El papel de las obras del escritor kazaj dulat issabekov en la educación moderna nacional y mundial O papel de trabalhos do escritor kazakh dulat issabekov na educação nacional e global moderna Recibido: 20 de septiembre de 2018. Aceptado: 11 de octubre de 2018 Written by: Zhaudir Sultanbekova (Corresponding Author)80 Kulbek Yergobek81 Kalipa Atemova82 Toty Koshenova83 Zhanat Yergubekova84 Abstract Resumen It is known that in every era, each nation has its Se sabe que en cada era, cada nación tiene sus own values and doctrines in the education of the propios valores y doctrinas en la educación de la younger generation. The reason is that the generación más joven. La razón es que la awareness of the younger generation, its national conciencia de la generación más joven, su psychology should be fostered in close relation to psicología nacional debe fomentarse en estrecha moral heritage of the ancestors. Currently, this is relación con la herencia moral de los one of the important factors for the Kazakh antepasados. Actualmente, este es uno de los people. At the same time, within the framework factores importantes para los kazajos. Al mismo of the President’s program ‘The Course towards tiempo, en el marco del programa del Presidente Future: Modernization of Public Conscience’, the ‘El curso hacia el futuro: modernización de la wide dissemination of the heritage of our national conciencia pública’, la amplia difusión del personalities and works and the education of patrimonio de nuestras personalidades y obras future generation are one of the key problems.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 CEU Political Science Journal 9(1-2): 16-38 CEU Political Science Journal
    THE NOTION OF “KAZAKHNESS” BEHIND THE SYMBOLIC NATION-BUILDING OF KAZAKHSTAN Narek Mkrtchyan Yerevan State University Abstract The paper deals with the processes of overcoming Russian ‘colonial’ impediments to the creation of symbolic spaces for the emergence of a new national self- consciousness in Kazakhstan. The paper highlights the importance of Nazarbaev’s decision to transfer to and construct a new capital Astana in fostering the ideas of national identity and ethnic belonging. Therefore, an attempt has been made to observe the phenomena of urbanization and reformulation of state symbols in explaining both ethnic and civic mechanisms of influences on people’s consciousness. Additionally, the works of various Kazakh intellectuals and cultural figures have been taken into consideration to examine the notion of Kazakhness and its’ contribution to the development of the Kazakh national identity. Content analysis of architectural design of Astana and state symbols is essential to understand the vision of Kazakhstan’s imagined future. Keywords: Astana, post-Soviet, post-colonial, national identity, nation building 1. Introduction After the breakdown of the Soviet Empire all post-communist regimes emphasized the role of ethno nationalism in establishing new nation-building projects. The model of Kazakhstan’s nation building is quite unique in terms of harmonious interethnic coexistence of a multiethnic society. Since independence President Nazarbaev initiated serious programs in an effort to start active nation-building processes. As a matter of fact, Nazarbaev’s nation and state building policies are represented for the Kazakhs as a civilizational endeavor. Nazarbaev took Kazakhstan through large scale administrative, legislative, social, economic and political reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan and Perestroika: Was a Chance at “Heroism” Lost?
    The Newsletter | No.60 | Summer 2012 14 | The Study Kazakhstan and Perestroika: was a chance at “heroism” lost? writer and the Deputy of the Congress of People’s Deputies On 17-18 December 1986, a students’ uprising took place in Almaty, the managed to establish the Commission of Investigation of the December events in 1989 and rejected the accusation capital of the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic (KazSSR). The pretext for the of nationalism among the young protesters. As a result, all participants were acquitted from all charges and released riots (commonly referred to as the December events) was the appointment from prison, or hospital (as the case was for many). Those who had perished during or after the events, had their names of the non-Kazakh and non-Kazakhstani “person from outside”, G. Kolbin, cleared posthumously. to the post of the First Secretary of the KazSSR Communist Party. The former Despite everything, the ideas of separatism did not gain wide support in the Republic. There was no wide public debate on First Secretary, D. Konayev, who had been leading the Republic since 1964, the issues discussed at the Congresses of People’s Deputies in Moscow in 1989-1991. Lacking their own vision on the reform, was removed from his post “due to the pension age”. The change of leader- the party elite continued to support Gorbachev’s course and did not reveal quests for political independence. Consequently, ship in Kazakhstan happened as a result of the rotation of cadres’ launched the Republic was the last one to announce its independence from the USSR, in 1991, when de facto the USSR had itself by M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Day Holding Hands Changed History Occupation and Annexation of the Baltic States Was Illegal, and Against the Wish of the Respective Nations
    The day holding hands changed history occupation and annexation of the Baltic states was illegal, and against the wish of the respective nations. So at 19:00 on 23 August 1989, 50 years after the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed, church bells sounded in the Bal- tic states. Mourning ribbons decorated the national flags that had been banned a year before. The participants of the Bal- tic Way were addressed by the leaders of the respective national independence movements: the Estonian Rahvarinne, the Lithuanian Sajūdis, and the Popular Front of Latvia. The following words were chanted – ‘laisvė’, ‘svabadus, ‘brīvība’ (freedom). The symbols of Nazi Germany and the Communist regime of the USSR were burnt on large bonfires. The Baltic states demanded the cessation of the half-century long Soviet occupation, col- onisation, russification and communist genocide. The Baltic Way was a significant step to- wards regaining the national independ- ence of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, and a source of inspiration for other region- al independence movements. The live chain was also realised in Kishinev by Ro- manians of the Soviet-occupied Bessara- bia or Moldova, while in January 1990, Ukrainians joined hands on the road from Lviv to Kyiv. Just after the Baltic Way campaign, the Berlin Wall fell, the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia began, and the Ceausescu regime in Romania was overthrown. On 23 August 1989, approximately two doomed to be forcedly incorporated into million people stood hand in hand be- the Soviet Union until 1991. The Soviet Un- Recognising the documents of the Baltic tween Tallinn (Estonia), Rīga (Latvia) ion claimed that the Baltic states joined Way as items of documentary heritage of and Vilnius (Lithuania) in one of the voluntarily.
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/13/23/Add.1 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/13/23/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 February 2010 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirteenth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and Protection of all Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, including the Right to Development Report of the independent expert on minority issues Addendum Mission to Kazakhstan* ** (6 to 15 July 2009) Summary Kazakhstan has approximately 130 different ethnic groups, many of which have lived on the territory of Kazakhstan for generations. Initiatives taken by the Government in the field of minority issues have undoubtedly helped to ensure stability and respect for diversity and minority rights. These initiatives have included important policies to help preserve minority languages, establish and fund cultural associations for the preservation of ethnic cultures and traditions and the establishment of consultative bodies, the most prominent of which is the Assembly of the People of Kazakhstan. The Assembly of the People, which plays a consultative or advisory role to the President, is a valuable national symbol of the recognition of minorities and the commitment of the State to the preservation of the cultural heritage of minorities. Nine seats in the lower house of Parliament are reserved for members chosen from the Assembly. However, the Assembly lacks the character of a legitimately representative body. Its membership is not constituted on a fully democratic basis and members are not, therefore, clearly accountable to their minority communities. * Late submission. ** The summary of the present report is being circulated in all official languages. The report itself, contained in the annex to the summary, is being circulated in the language of submission and in Russian only.
    [Show full text]
  • International Service Learning Case Study
    ALLA BELYAKINA THE HUMAN BEING AS A LEGEND (translated by Dina Mukhamedkhan) USA. Missoula 2005 - 2006 Kayum Mukhamedkhanov became a legend in his lifetime, a dignified citizen of Kazakhstan and a profound scholar whose research is held in highest regard today in Kazakhstan. During the political repression of the intelligentsia in the 1950-s my father and our family suffered severely. He was condemned and imprisoned for the research on the “Abai’s school of followers” that he implemented under the supervision of his teacher Mukhtar Auezov. Kayum Mukhamedkhanov upheld as a supreme life value a Dignity of every human being, high moral principles, humane attitude that he himself demonstrated in everything he did: in dealing with people, in writing, in research, in revealing many names from the oblivion, in teaching, in public meetings. Recently his colleagues, followers, friends have written a book of reminiscences about this amazing person. A young and talented literary critic and a journalist Alla Belyakina from Kayum’s hometown Semipalatinsk contributed to this book with her breath taking writing on Kayum. She backed up her writing with the original historical and the archives’ materials and her interviews. I am pleased to bring to your attention this translation – a part from that book. I consider it to be of utmost importance and value to present to your attention this work: we really need cases and examples of human values and citizenship. I would like to express my great appreciation and gratitude to my dear friend Kimberly Crook for her generous help in making the English translation more idiomatic and somewhat clearer.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Dynamics of High School Graduates Who Participated in the Unified National Test Kazakhstan
    IEJME — MATHEMATICS EDUCATION 2016, VOL. 11, NO. 8, 3176-3186 OPEN ACCESS Analysis of dynamics of high school graduates who participated in the unified national test Kazakhstan Bakhtiyar Bakas uulua Yessengali Smagulov b a Kyrgyz Economic University, KYRGYZSTAN b I.Zhansugurov Zhetysu State University, KAZAKHSTAN ABSTRACT In 2013 it has been executed 10 years since the introduction of the Unified National Test for graduates of secondary schools in Kazakhstan in 2013. The higher education system in Kazakhstan has changed with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the transition to a market economy economic development. The number of higher education institutions keenly has increased. In 1991 the republic had 55 universities by universities peaked to 182 in 2001. Conducting Unified National Test for all 10 years since its introduction, accompanied by disputes about its feasibility and objectivity. Opponents of this system have argued that the tests is only a form of learning the curriculum, while the paramount importance should be attached to the quality of education. UNT defenders argue that the testing system - it is a well-established and effective form of graduate’s examination worldwide, and Kazakhstan as a part of the international community must comply with the advanced world standards. Since 2009, a growing number of graduates in the Kazakh language, and a sharp decline in graduates with Russian language of teaching. Thus, in the coming years we should expect an expansion of application areas of the Kazakh language due to the fact that increase the proportion of people who use the Kazakh language as the core. For 10 years, the UNT average score of rural schools graduates is lower than of city schools graduates.
    [Show full text]
  • Ұлы Дала Төсіндегі Ислам Ислам В Великой Степи Islam of the Great Steppe
    Серікбай қажы ОРАЗ Қазақстан мұсылмандары діни басқармасы Духовное управление мусульман Казахстана Spiritual Administration of Muslims of Kazakhstan ҰЛЫ ДАЛА ТӨСІНДЕГІ ИСЛАМ ИСЛАМ В ВЕЛИКОЙ СТЕПИ ISLAM OF THE GREAT STEPPE Астана, 2018 Бұл еңбек еліміздегі Ислам дінінің кешегісі мен бүгінін, ғасырлар қойнауынан сүрлеу тартқан сара жолын сипаттауға арналған. Сонау VIII ғасырларда қазақ топырағында бүр жарған асыл дініміздің бүгінгі күнге дейінгі бұралаң жолдары мен салтанатты шақтарынан сыр шертетін құжаттық деректермен, тарихи фотосуреттермен қоса баяндалады. Талас топырағындағы шайқаста туы желбіреген Ислам дінінің қағанаттар мен хандықтар тұсындағы, Патшалық Ресей, Кеңес үкіметі кезеңі мен еліміздің егемендік алған жылдардағы тарихы қысқаша қамтылған. Еңбек барша оқырман қауымға арналған. Книга, повествующая о чистом пути Ислама, проложенном через дебри веков на казахской земле, ставшей путеводной звездой на небосклоне страны великих степей. Посредством документальных свидетельств и фотоснимков в ней рассказывается о прошлом и настоящем мусульманской религии, ростки которой взошли в казахских степях в VIII веке. Кратко описывается развитие Ислама, поднявшего знамя при битве в окрестностях Талас, во времена правления каганатов и ханств, в эпохе Российской империи, Советской власти и в годы после обретения Казахстаном государственной независимости. Книга рекомендуется широкому кругу читателей. This work is dedicated was designed to describe the past and present of the Islamic religion in our country throughout the century. The winding roads and brilliant moments that our religion, since the moment it appeared in our country in the VIII century, has experienced was documented with historical accounts and photographs. This work covers the brief history of Islam in the Kazakh land, which gave its start with the victory of the Battle of Talas, during the Khanates, the Tsarist Russia and Soviet Union, and the years of sovereignty of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Kazakhstan
    DOING BUSINESS 2021 IN KAZAKHSTAN Doing Business in Kazakhstan 2021 Baker McKenzie – CIS, Limited Almaty office Samal Towers, 8th Floor 97 Zholdasbekov Street Almaty, Kazakhstan 050051 Phone: +7 727 3 300 500 Facsimile: +7 727 258 40 00 [email protected] www.bakermckenzie.com The information in this brochure is for informational purposes only and it may not reflect the most current legal developments, judgments or settlements. This information is not offered as legal or any other advice on any particular matter. The Firm and the contributing authors expressly disclaim all liability to any person in respect of anything and in respect of the consequences of anything done or omitted wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of Baker McKenzie’s “Doing Business in Kazakhstan” brochure. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any matter contained in this brochure without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances. Doing Business in Kazakhstan Table of Contents 1 Kazakhstan — an overview ..................................................... 1 1.1 Geography .................................................................... 1 1.2 Population .................................................................... 1 1.3 History.......................................................................... 1 1.4 Government and political system ................................. 2 1.5 Economy .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The History of “Alash Orda” Autonomy As the Attempt of Bourgeois Government’S Determination on the Territory of Kazakhstan in 1918-1920
    THE HISTORY OF “ALASH ORDA” AUTONOMY AS THE ATTEMPT OF BOURGEOIS GOVERNMENT’S DETERMINATION ON THE TERRITORY OF KAZAKHSTAN IN 1918-1920 G. Z. Kozhakhmetov Decano del Departamento de Derecho Universidad Estatal de Karaganda República de Kazajistán G. Z. KOZHAKHMETOV This article devoted to the history of the formation “Alash-Orda “ autonomy in Kazakhstan in 1918-1920. Alash-Orda “ autonomy had been shown as the one of national-models of state’s building in this period, alongside wite guard’s variant and Bolshevik’s soviet. Although this article explores reasons and circumstances of licuidation «Alash-Orda» government in Kazakhstan. February bourgeois-democratically revolution of 1917 in Russia left it’s trace in the history of humanity finishing one of the hard, totalitarian regime of that time. As the result of revolution the imperator of Russia Nikolai II renounced from his throne. There was formed the Temporary government where representatives of different political forces were entered. The main purpose of the Temporary government was the convocation of All-Russian Constituent Assembly, where was supposed to decide finally the form of Russian government’s ruling, but it was uniquely that it supposed to be in the manner of democratically republic. Unfortunately, the Temporary government couldn’t solve it’s problems, because was obliged to participate in World War I, because of obligations with it’s ally. The country, in the condition of war was plunged to hard economical crisis: there was the lack of provisions, the rise of unemployment , which later will be a communists’ weapon for government up herald’s realization in October 1917.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Information As a Historical Source Using the Example of the Estonian and Other Baltic Diasporas in Kazakhstan1
    Ajalooline Ajakiri, 2020, 1 (171), 29–66 Personal information as a historical source using the example of the Estonian and other Baltic diasporas in Kazakhstan1 Mariya Oinas According to the latest census (2009), sixteen million people live in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Forty percent of the population is non-Kazakh, including representatives of almost 130 nationalities and ethnic groups. The formation of the multinational population of Kazakhstan has a complex two-century history. Up to the eighteenth century, Kazakhs constituted most of the inhabitants of the Kazakh Khanate. With the incorporation of Kazakhstan into the Russian Empire, the resettlement of Slavic peoples into the steppe regions began, the influx consisting of mostly peasants and Cossacks. From the first half of the eighteenth century, fortifications and lines of defence were built and settled by serfs. The tsarist state also used Kazakhstan as a place of political exile. The main influx of migration was related to the resettlement policy of the Russian Prime Minister P. Stolypin in the early twentieth century, which was supposed to solve the economic, social and demographic problems of the Russian Empire through the devel- opment of new lands. According to some estimates, over one million peo- ple from the European regions of the empire immigrated to Kazakhstan in the pre-revolutionary period.2 The Soviet government also contributed to the multinational charac- ter of the population of Kazakhstan through massive forced migrations. Shortly after the October Revolution, intellectuals, clergy and aristocrats 1 The research for this article was conducted with the support from the European Regional Development Fund.
    [Show full text]