DOCSLIB.ORG

Delving Deeper Critical Challenges for 21St Century Deep-Sea Research

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delving Deeper Critical Challenges for 21St Century Deep-Sea Research EUROPEAN MARINE BOARD Delving Deeper Critical challenges for 21st century deep-sea research Position Paper 22 Wandelaarkaai 7 I 8400 Ostend I Belgium Tel.: +32(0)59 34 01 63 I Fax: +32(0)59 34 01 65 E-mail: [email protected] www.marineboard.eu www.marineboard.eu European Marine Board The Marine Board provides a pan-European platform for its member organizations to develop common priorities, to advance marine research, and to bridge the gap between science and policy in order to meet future marine science challenges and opportunities. The Marine Board was established in 1995 to facilitate enhanced cooperation between European marine science organizations towards the development of a common vision on the research priorities and strategies for marine science in Europe. Members are either major national marine or oceanographic institutes, research funding agencies, or national consortia of universities with a strong marine research focus. In 2015, the Marine Board represents 36 Member Organizations from 19 countries. The Board provides the essential components for transferring knowledge for leadership in marine research in Europe. Adopting a strategic role, the Marine Board serves its member organizations by providing a forum within which marine research policy advice to national agencies and to the European Commission is developed, with the objective of promoting the establishment of the European marine Research Area. www.marineboard.eu European Marine Board Member Organizations UNIVERSITÉS MARINES Irish Marine Universities National Research Council of Italy Consortium MASTS Delving Deeper: Critical challenges for 21st century deep-sea research European Marine Board Position Paper 22 This position paper is based on the activities of the European Marine Board Working Group Deep-Sea Research (WG Deep Sea) Coordinating author and WG Chair Alex D. Rogers Contributing Authors Alex D. Rogers, Andrew Brierley, Peter Croot, Marina R. Cunha, Roberto Danovaro, Colin Devey, Alf-Håkon Hoel, Henry A. Ruhl, Pierre-Marie Sarradin, Seline Trevisanut, Sybille van den Hove, Helena Vieira, Martin Visbeck Series Editor Niall McDonough Publication Editors Kate Larkin, Karen Donaldson and Niall McDonough External Reviewers Kristina Gjerde (Wycliffe Management, Poland) and Phil Weaver (Seascape Consultants Ltd, UK) Internal review process The content of this document has been subject to internal review, editorial support and approval by the European Marine Board Member Organizations (shown opposite). Additional contributions EurOcean, Antje Boetius, Emily Corcoran, Karen Donaldson, Matt Gianni, Mark Hannington, Tim Packeiser, Francisco Souza Dias, Torsten Thiele and Klaus Wallmann The European Marine Board extends thanks to the members of international deep-sea stakeholder community who contributed to this position paper, and in particular the investment study. Suggested reference Rogers, A.D., Brierley, A., Croot, P., Cunha, M.R., Danovaro, R., Devey, C., Hoel, A.H., Ruhl, H.A., Sarradin, P-M., Trevisanut, S., van den Hove, S., Vieira, H., Visbeck, M. (2015) Delving Deeper: Critical challenges for 21st century deep-sea research. Larkin, K.E., Donaldson, K. and McDonough, N. (Eds.) Position Paper 22 of the European Marine Board, Ostend, Belgium. 224 pp. ISBN 978-94-920431-1-5 www.marineboard.eu [email protected] Second edition, September 2015 Foreword For centuries humans have been crossing the ocean in search of resources and new lands to occupy. Long-distance mariners have a rare insight into the sheer scale of the ocean beyond the continental shelf, where the seabed falls away to depths measured in kilometres. There is no agreed definition of what constitutes the “deep sea”. If we define it as that part of the ocean below 200m in depth (i.e. beyond the penetration of natural light and the reach of humans without the use of submersible technology), then the deep sea covers about 65% of the earth’s surface and provides 95% of its bio- sphere. Its importance within the earth system as a regulator of climate and a provider of ecosystem goods and services cannot be overstated, although the nature and value of these benefits remain poorly understood. Arguably, we know more about the moon and Venus than the deep sea and spend considerably more on space exploration than on deep-sea research. It is imperative that we rectify this knowledge (and funding) deficit by moving beyond piecemeal and short-term scientific studies. In short, we must embark on a new era of exploration of the earth’s final frontier: the deep sea. Why now? Europe is a maritime continent and the EU Blue Growth strategy, launched in 2012, aims to expand our maritime economy, creating 1.6 million new jobs by 2020. Until now, human maritime activities such as fisheries, aquaculture, oil and gas production, aggregate extraction, and recreation and tourism have largely been conducted in coastal and shallow shelf seas. However, there has been a rapid development in interest in accessing ocean resources in deeper waters beyond the continental shelf. Commercial inter- ests include deep-sea mining (mining the ocean floor for valuable minerals and rare earth elements), deep-sea oil and gas production, and deep-sea fisheries. There is also interest in using organisms found in extreme deep-sea environments as a source of interesting bioactive compounds which could be used to generate new drugs, nutraceuticals and industrial products. While activities such as fishing, mining and oil and gas production in the deep sea are becoming technically and economically feasi- ble, they remain highly contentious. Many believe that the potential risks and environmental impacts associated with such activities in the deep sea are too great. We also lack adequate legal and policy frameworks to regulate access to and utilization of deep-sea resources - both living and non-living - in areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) and international discussions on these issues are currently ongoing in the framework of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). What is clear is that technol- ogy development and commercial interest is moving at a pace that outstrips the ocean governance discussions and the generation of new knowledge through scientific research. If commercial activities are to proceed, it is imperative that we develop a much greater knowledge and understanding of the deep sea. It is important to note that in producing a position paper that addresses deep-sea research explicitly, we are not advocating a reduc- tionist approach whereby the deep sea is studied in isolation from other parts of the ocean and earth system. Indeed, understanding the links between the deep ocean, shallow and coastal waters, the land and atmosphere is an important recommendation of this paper. Nonetheless, there are particular challenges to studying the deep sea that merit special attention. Deep-sea exploration is costly, requires extensive and long-term planning, and carries with it a greater level of risk. In addition, most of the deep sea falls out- side of national jurisdiction which presents legal and regulatory challenges. For these reasons, international cooperation is especially important in addressing deep-sea research and in deciding on appropriate management and governance frameworks for deep-sea resources. Industrial development in the deep sea will require advanced technologies and significant investment, the vast majority of which will come from private sources. Hence, an overarching recommendation of this position paper is that, to support Blue Growth, European public research funding should target fundamental scientific research on all components of the deep sea environment and the estab- lishment of environmental baselines. Where possible, this should be done in a time frame that will complement and keep track with industrial expansion in the deep sea. Key areas for public research investment include, inter alia, mapping deep-sea terrain and habi- tats; studying deep-sea biodiversity; understanding deep-sea ecosystem functioning, connectivity and resilience; developing sustained deep-sea observing systems; identifying appropriate indicators and targets for environmental health in the deep sea; and developing innovative governance frameworks to ensure efficiency, transparency and fairness in accessing, utilizing and deriving benefits from deep-sea resources. On behalf of the EMB membership, I would like to extend my sincere thanks to the deep-sea working group experts for their dedica- tion and hard work in producing this detailed paper. Particular thanks must go to Professor Alex Rogers, Chair of the working group. It is a well-worn adage that if you want to get something done, ask a busy person. This is notably true in Alex’s case. He has worked tirelessly and always in good spirit to guide the process at all stages, despite his numerous other committments. My thanks also to the EMB Secretariat, in particular to Niall McDonough, Kate Larkin and Karen Donaldson, who worked continuously behind the scenes to support the work of the group and the finalization of the paper. I sincerely hope that this paper will provide the basis for a new im- petus in European deep-sea research and a guide to funders and decision makers on the most pressing deep-sea research challenges. Jan Mees Chair, European Marine Board Table of contents Foreword 2 Executive Summary 6 1. Introduction 8 1.1 The deep sea 9 1.2 The knowledge deficit 14 1.2.1 Our inner planet 14 1.2.2 Deep-sea ecosystems and connectivity 14
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 12 REVISED J Caveorum Profile
    Document SPRFMO-III-SWG-12 Information describing Jasus caveorum fisheries relating to the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation REVISED 20 February 2007 DRAFT 1. Overview.......................................................................................................................2 2. Taxonomy.....................................................................................................................3 2.1 Phylum..................................................................................................................3 2.2 Class.....................................................................................................................3 2.3 Order.....................................................................................................................3 2.4 Family...................................................................................................................3 2.5 Genus and species.................................................................................................3 2.6 Scientific synonyms...............................................................................................3 2.7 Common names.....................................................................................................3 2.8 Molecular (DNA or biochemical) bar coding.........................................................3 3. Species characteristics....................................................................................................3 3.1 Global distribution
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems – Processes and Practices in the High Seas Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems Processes and Practices in the High Seas
    ISSN 2070-7010 FAO 595 FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE TECHNICAL PAPER 595 Vulnerable marine ecosystems – Processes and practices in the high seas Vulnerable marine ecosystems Processes and practices in the high seas This publication, Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems: processes and practices in the high seas, provides regional fisheries management bodies, States, and other interested parties with a summary of existing regional measures to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from significant adverse impacts caused by deep-sea fisheries using bottom contact gears in the high seas. This publication compiles and summarizes information on the processes and practices of the regional fishery management bodies, with mandates to manage deep-sea fisheries in the high seas, to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems. ISBN 978-92-5-109340-5 ISSN 2070-7010 FAO 9 789251 093405 I5952E/2/03.17 Cover photo credits: Photo descriptions clockwise from top-left: Acanthagorgia spp., Paragorgia arborea, Vase sponges (images courtesy of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada); and Callogorgia spp. (image courtesy of Kirsty Kemp, the Zoological Society of London). FAO FISHERIES AND Vulnerable marine ecosystems AQUACULTURE TECHNICAL Processes and practices in the high seas PAPER 595 Edited by Anthony Thompson FAO Consultant Rome, Italy Jessica Sanders Fisheries Officer FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy Merete Tandstad Fisheries Resources Officer FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy Fabio Carocci Fishery Information Assistant FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy and Jessica Fuller FAO Consultant Rome, Italy FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2016 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Order ZEIFORMES PARAZENIDAE Parazens P.C
    click for previous page Zeiformes: Parazenidae 1203 Order ZEIFORMES PARAZENIDAE Parazens P.C. Heemstra, South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, South Africa iagnostic characters: Small to moderate-sized (to 30 cm) oblong fishes, the head and body com- Dpressed; body depth slightly less than head length, contained 2.6 to 2.9 times in standard length; head naked, the bones thin and soft; opercular bones weakly serrate; mouth large, terminal, the upper jaw extremely protrusile; maxilla widely expanded posteriorly, and mostly exposed when mouth is closed; no supramaxilla; jaws with 1 or 2 rows of small, slender, conical teeth; vomer with a few short stout teeth;gill rakers (including rudiments) 2 on upper limb, 8 on lower limb.Eye diameter about 1/3 head length and slightly less than snout length.Branchiostegal rays 7.Dorsal fin divided, with 8 slender spines and 26 to 30 soft rays; anal fin with 1 minute spine and 30 to 32 soft rays; dorsal-, anal-, and pectoral-fin rays un- branched; caudal fin forked, with 11 principal rays and 9 branched rays; pectoral fin with 15 or 16 rays, shorter than eye diameter; pelvic fins with 1 unbranched and 5 or 6 branched soft rays, but no spine, fin origin posterior to a vertical at pectoral-fin base. Scales moderate in size, weakly ctenoid, and deciduous; 2 lateral lines originating on body at upper end of operculum and running posteriorly about 4 scale rows apart, gradually converging to form a single line on caudal peduncle. Caudal peduncle stout, the least depth about equal to its length and slightly less than eye diameter.Vertebrae 34.Colour: body reddish or silvery; large black blotch on anterior margin of dorsal fin.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Impacts on the Distribution of Coastal Lobsters
    Marine Biology (2018) 165:186 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-018-3441-9 SHORT NOTE Climate change impacts on the distribution of coastal lobsters Joana Boavida‑Portugal1,2 · Rui Rosa2 · Ricardo Calado3 · Maria Pinto4 · Inês Boavida‑Portugal5 · Miguel B. Araújo1,6,7 · François Guilhaumon8,9 Received: 17 January 2018 / Accepted: 26 October 2018 / Published online: 16 November 2018 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Coastal lobsters support important fsheries all over the world, but there is evidence that climate-induced changes may jeopardize some stocks. Here we present the frst global forecasts of changes in coastal lobster species distribution under climate change, using an ensemble of ecological niche models (ENMs). Global changes in richness were projected for 125 coastal lobster species for the end of the century, using a stabilization scenario (4.5 RCP). We compared projected changes in diversity with lobster fsheries data and found that losses in suitable habitat for coastal lobster species were mainly projected in areas with high commercial fshing interest, with species projected to contract their climatic envelope between 40 and 100%. Higher losses of spiny lobsters are projected in the coasts of wider Caribbean/Brazil, eastern Africa and Indo-Pacifc region, areas with several directed fsheries and aquacultures, while clawed lobsters are projected to shifts their envelope to northern latitudes likely afecting the North European, North American and Canadian fsheries. Fisheries represent an important resource for local and global economies and understanding how they might be afected by climate change scenarios is paramount when developing specifc or regional management strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Drivers of Diversification in a Marine Species Complex 2 3 Catarina N.S
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.13.874883; this version posted December 15, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Global drivers of diversification in a marine species complex 2 3 Catarina N.S. Silva1, Nicholas P. Murphy2, James J. Bell3, Bridget S. Green4, Guy Duhamel5, Andrew C. 4 Cockcroft6, Cristián E. Hernández7, Jan M. Strugnell1, 2 5 6 7 1 Centre of Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and AQuaculture, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4810, 8 Australia 9 2 Department of Ecology, Environment & Evolution, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia 10 3 School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand 11 4 Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia 12 5 Département Adaptations du Vivant, BOREA, MNHN, Paris, 75005, France 13 6 Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Cape Town, 8012, South Africa 14 7 Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de Concepción, 15 Casilla 160C, Concepción, Chile 16 17 18 Abstract 19 Investigating historical gene flow in species complexes can indicate how environmental and reproductive 20 barriers shape genome divergence before speciation. The processes influencing species diversification under 21 environmental change remain one of the central focal points of evolutionary biology, particularly for marine 22 organisms with high dispersal potential. We investigated genome-wide divergence, introgression patterns and 23 inferred demographic history between species pairs of all extant rock lobster species (Jasus spp.), a complex 24 with long larval duration, that has populated continental shelf and seamount habitats around the globe at 25 approximately 40oS.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Malacostraca, Bathynellacea, 16S Rdna
    Contributions to Zoology, 71 (4) 123-129 (2002) SPB AcademicPublishing bv. The Hague A note on the systematic position of the Bathynellacea (Crustacea, Malacostraca) using molecular evidence Ana+Isabel Camacho Isabel Rey²,Beatriz+A. Dorda Annie ³ ², Machordom Antonio+G. Valdecasas ¹ ³, 'Museo Naturales Nacional de Ciencias (CSIC). Dpto. Biodiversidady Biologia Evolutiva. C/ Jose Gutierrez Ahascal 28006- 2 2, Madrid. Spain, [email protected]; Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), de Colecciones. Jose Gutierrez 3 Dpto. C/ Ahascal 2, 28006- Madrid; Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Dpto. Biodiversidady Biologia Evolutiva. C/ Jose Gutierrez Ahascal 2, 28006- Madrid. Keywords: Systematics, Crustacea, Malacostraca, Bathynellacea, 16S rDNA. lar, is the Abstract usually homogeneous amongst special- ists. The traditional of way working is to use the latest information or the latest Molecular data for the 16S of ba- hypothesis mt rDNA gene fragment a published in order to thynellacean is here presented for the first time and used to select those views that are going to be the of within the analyze relationship the group crustacean class compared. However, it must be universal that where Malacostraca Two (Arthropoda, Bathynellacea). contrasting there is more than one taxonomist working on a views have classified the bathynelids as being cither within the there will be group not a single hypothesis or in- order Syncarida or in a separate super-order Podophallocarida of the How terpretation descent. or small based group’s big belonging to the infra-class Eonomostraca, a disagreement are these irrelevant on debates internal The discrepancies and does it not mainly over external and morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • Provisional Agenda*
    CBD Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/16/INF/6 11 April 2012 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH SUBSIDIARY BODY ON SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE Sixteenth meeting Montreal, 30 April-5 May 2012 Item 6.1 of the provisional agenda* REPORT OF THE WESTERN SOUTH PACIFIC REGIONAL WORKSHOP TO FACILITATE THE DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT MARINE AREAS INTRODUCTION 1. At its tenth meeting, the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 10) requested the Executive Secretary to work with Parties and other Governments as well as competent organizations and regional initiatives, such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), regional seas conventions and action plans, and, where appropriate, regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs), with regard to fisheries management, to organize, including the setting of terms of reference, a series of regional workshops, with a primary objective to facilitate the description of ecologically or biologically significant marine areas through the application of scientific criteria in annex I to decision IX/20 as well as other relevant compatible and complementary nationally and intergovernmentally agreed scientific criteria, as well as the scientific guidance on the identification of marine areas beyond national jurisdiction, which meet the scientific criteria in annex I to decision IX/20 (paragraph 36, decision X/29). 2. In the same decision (paragraph 41), the Conference of the Parties requested that the Executive Secretary make available the scientific and technical data and information and results collated through the workshops referred to above to participating Parties, other Governments, intergovernmental agencies and the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) for their use according to their competencies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of the Deepwater Benthic Communities of the Great Australian Bight Marine Park
    MMaarriinnee EEnnvviirroonnmmeenntt && EEccoollooggyy A preliminary assessment of the deepwater benthic communities of the Great Australian Bight Marine Park David R. Currie and Shirley J. Sorokin SARDI Publication No. F2011/000526-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 592 SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 December 2011 Report to the South Australian Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Commonwealth Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities A preliminary assessment of the deepwater benthic communities of the Great Australian Bight Marine Park Report to the South Australian Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Commonwealth Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities David R. Currie and Shirley J. Sorokin SARDI Publication No. F2011/000526-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 592 December 2011 Currie, D.R. and Sorokin, S.J. (2011) Deepwater benthos of the GABMP This Publication may be cited as: Currie, D.R. and Sorokin, S.J (2011). A preliminary assessment of the deepwater benthic communities of the Great Australian Bight Marine Park. Report to the South Australian Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Commonwealth Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2011/000526- 1. SARDI Research Report Series No. 592. 61pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Dunn (2013) Ecosystem Impacts of Orange Roughy Fisheries
    Please do not cite without prior reference to the author ECOSYSTEM IMPACTS OF ORANGE ROUGHY FISHERIES Dr Matthew Dunn School of Biological Sciences Victoria University of Wellington [email protected] July 2013 Summary This document provides background information and a perspective on the ecosystem impact of orange roughy fishing. It is not comprehensive, but intended to be indicative of current knowledge and understanding. My objective was to consider how we might best monitor the orange roughy ecosystem for signs of significant or informative change in function, and in its ability to maintain ecosystem services. I have structured the text into sections; (1) the orange roughy ecosystem, (2) ecosystem outcome, (3) ecosystem management, and (4) ecosystem monitoring. My focus is on (1) and (2). Within these first two sections, I have kept a summary of key existing knowledge separate from a discussion of theory and research. The latter may include further detail on existing research and data sets, other pertinent findings, and ideas for research which may improve our understanding. Orange roughy fishing has two main impacts. The first is capture of target species and by‐catch, and the second is damage to the seabed by bottom trawls (including incidental mortality). I have tended to focus on the ecosystem impacts of the former. This is because of my expertise, and because bottom trawl impacts may be reduced, minimised or mitigated through reduction in the trawl footprint, whereas a Bmsy objective does, by definition, require a persistent and substantial reduction in the biomass of the target species (and potentially the closely associated by‐catch).
    [Show full text]
  • SPRFMO4 SWG 11 Species Profile
    SPRFMO-IV-SWG-11 Information describing Oreosomatidae (Allocyttus niger, Neocyttus rhomboidalis and Pseudocyttus maculates) fisheries relating to the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation Black oreo Spiky oreo Smooth oreo WORKING DRAFT 02 September 2007 1 Overview...........................................................................................................................2 2 Taxonomy.........................................................................................................................3 2.1 Phylum......................................................................................................................3 2.2 Class..........................................................................................................................3 2.3 Order.........................................................................................................................3 2.4 Family.......................................................................................................................3 2.5 Genus and species......................................................................................................3 2.6 Scientific synonyms...................................................................................................3 2.7 Common names.........................................................................................................3 2.8 Molecular (DNA or biochemical) bar coding..............................................................3 3 Species Characteristics.....................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Orange Roughy (Hoplostethus Atlanticus)
    Seafood Watch Seafood Report Orange Roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) Final Report March 28, 2003 Melissa M Stevens Fisheries Research Analyst Monterey Bay Aquarium Orange_Roughy_SFW _MS_Final.doc 28 March 2003 About Seafood Watch® and the Seafood Reports Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch defines sustainable seafood as species, whether fished or farmed, that can exist into the long-term by maintaining or increasing stock abundance and conserving the structure, function, biodiversity and productivity of the surrounding ecosystem. Seafood Watch® makes its science- based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from the web (www.montereybayaquarium.org) or obtained from the program by emailing [email protected]. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and to shift the buying habits of consumers, restaurateurs and other seafood purveyors to support sustainable fishing and aquaculture practices. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices”, “Proceed with Caution” or “Avoid”. In producing the Seafood Reports, Seafood Watch seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible. Other sources of information include government technical publications, fishery management plans and supporting documents, and other scientific reviews of ecological sustainability. Seafood Watch Fishery Analysts also communicate regularly with ecologists, fisheries and aquaculture scientists, and members of industry and conservation organizations when evaluating fisheries and aquaculture practices.
    [Show full text]