DOCSLIB.ORG

Licuati Forest Reserve, Mozambique: Flora, Utilization and Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Licuati Forest Reserve, Mozambique: Flora, Utilization and Conservation LICUATI FOREST RESERVE, MOZAMBIQUE: FLORA, UTILIZATION AND CONSERVATION by Samira Aly Izidine Research Project Report submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the taught degree Magister Scientiae (Systematics and Conservation Evaluation) in the Faculty of Natural & Agricultural Sciences Department of Botany (with Department of Zoology & Entomology) University of Pretoria Pretoria Supervisor: Prof. Dr. A.E.van Wyk May 2003 © University of Pretoria Digitised by the Open Scholarship & Digitisation Programme, University of Pretoria, 2016. I LICUATI FOREST RESERVE, MOZAMBIQUE: FLORA, UTILIZATION AND CONSERVATION Samira Aly lzidine 2003 © University of Pretoria Digitised by the Open Scholarship & Digitisation Programme, University of Pretoria, 2016. To the glory of God and to the memory of my dear father, Aly Abdul Azize Izidine, 6-11-1927 - 7-03-2003 A gl6ria de Deus e em memoria ao meu querido pai, Aly Abdul Azize Izidine, 6-11-1927 - 7-03-2003 © University of Pretoria Digitised by the Open Scholarship & Digitisation Programme, University of Pretoria, 2016. TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION .................................................................................................. i LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES .............................................................. iv LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES ............................................................... v ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT PROPOSAL ................................................................................... 3 Rational and motivation ................................................................................... 3 Principal aims ................................................................................................... 5 Research questions ........................................................................................... 6 Layout of Report .............................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION ............................................... 7 1.1 Background ................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Physical description ................................................................................... 8 1.3 Climate ........................................................................................................ 9 1. 4 Flora and vegetation of Maputaland ......................................................... 9 1.4.1 Vegetation .......................................................................................... 9 1.4.2 Flora and endemism ......................................................................... 10 1.4.3 Forests ofMaputaland ..................................................................... 12 1.4.4 Sand Forest ....................................................................................... 13 1.5 Forest reserves in Mozambique ............................................................... 15 1.6 Licuati Forest Reserve ............................................................................. 16 1.6.1 History and location ......................................................................... 16 1.6.2 Flora and vegetation ........................................................................ 17 1. 7 SABONET expedition ............................................................................. 19 1. 7.1 New record of a Xylopia species ..................................................... 20 CHAPTER 2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND .......................................... 21 2.1 General ...................................................................................................... 21 2.2 The Santaca family ................................................................................... 21 2.3 Interview with Chief Santaca .................................................................. 24 2.4 Medicinal Plants ....................................................................................... 25 2.5 The Sacred Forest ..................................................................................... 25 2.6 Utilisation ................................................................................................. 26 2. 7 Economic and social development .......................................................... 27 CHAPTER 3. GENERAL MATERIAL AND METHODS ........................ 30 3.1 Visit to the study area .............................................................................. 30 3.2 Field work ................................................................................................. 30 11 © University of Pretoria Digitised by the Open Scholarship & Digitisation Programme, University of Pretoria, 2016. 3.3 Herbarium studies .................................................................................... 31 3.4 Checklist of plants of Licuati Thicket. .................................................... 31 3. 5 Dynamics of Licuati Thicket ................................................................... 31 3.6 Historical information and current utilisation ofLicuati Thicket ......... 32 3.7 Studies onXylopia (leaf anatomy) .......................................................... 33 3.8 Leafmacromorphology (SEM studies) .................................................. 35 CHAPTER 4. THE LICUATI THICKET .................................................... 36 4.1 Title page .................................................................................................. 36 4.2 Abstract ..................................................................................................... 37 4.3 Introduction .............................................................................................. 38 4.4 Material and methods ............................................................................... 43 4. 5 Results and discussion ............................................................................. 44 4.6 Conclusions .............................................................................................. 53 4. 7 Recol111llendations .................................................................................... 55 4.8 Acknowledgements .................................................................................. 56 4. 9 References ................................................................................................ 57 CHAPTER 5. IDENTITY OF XYLOPIA TORREIN. ROBSON ............... 58 5.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 58 5.2 Material and methods ............................................................................... 61 5.3 Conclusions .............................................................................................. 62 5.4 Acknowledgements .................................................................................. 62 5.5 Specimens examined ................................................................................ 63 5. 6 References ................................................................................................ 66 CHAPTER 6. SUMMARY ........................................................................... 67 GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................... 69 CURRICULUM VITAE ................................................................................ 72 GENERAL REFERENCES ........................................................................... 73 APPENDICES ................................................................................................ 79 APPENDIX 1: ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF PLANTS OF LICUATI THICKET .................................................................................................. 80 APPENDIX 2: MISCELLANEOUS PHOTOGRAPHS ............................. 98 Ill © University of Pretoria Digitised by the Open Scholarship & Digitisation Programme, University of Pretoria, 2016. LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Figures Figure 1. Map showing the location of the Licuati Forest Reserve (LFR), southern Mozambique .................................................................... 40 Figure 2. Map showing the Licuati Thicket, Licuati Forest Reserve, southern Mozambique ................................................................................... 41 Figures 3-6. SEM micrographs of leaf lower surfaces. 3 & 4 Xylopia torrei, 5 & 6 Xylopia odoratissima ........................................................... 64 Figures 7-10. SEM micrographs of leaf lower surfaces. 7 & 8 Xylopia parviflora, 9 & 10 Xylopia tomentosa .......................................... 65 Tables Table 1. Number of families, genera and species ofPteridophyta, Monocoty ledonae and Dicoty ledonae recorded from the Licuati Thicket .............................................. :............................................... 44 Table 2. Synopsis of families that contribute 1% or more to the total number of species in the Licuati Thicket, LFR ........................................... 45 Table 3. Synopsis of families that contribute 1% of more of the total number of MC endemics in the Licuati Thicket, as compared to the figures for the Maputo Elephant Reserve ................................................... 4 7 Table 4. Families with five or more small tree or shrub species in the flora of Licuati ..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vascular Plant Survey of Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve, Malawi
    YIKA-VWAZA TRUST RESEARCH STUDY REPORT N (2017/18) Vascular Plant Survey of Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve, Malawi By Sopani Sichinga ([email protected]) September , 2019 ABSTRACT In 2018 – 19, a survey on vascular plants was conducted in Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve. The reserve is located in the north-western Malawi, covering an area of about 986 km2. Based on this survey, a total of 461 species from 76 families were recorded (i.e. 454 Angiosperms and 7 Pteridophyta). Of the total species recorded, 19 are exotics (of which 4 are reported to be invasive) while 1 species is considered threatened. The most dominant families were Fabaceae (80 species representing 17. 4%), Poaceae (53 species representing 11.5%), Rubiaceae (27 species representing 5.9 %), and Euphorbiaceae (24 species representing 5.2%). The annotated checklist includes scientific names, habit, habitat types and IUCN Red List status and is presented in section 5. i ACKNOLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, let me thank the Nyika–Vwaza Trust (UK) for funding this work. Without their financial support, this work would have not been materialized. The Department of National Parks and Wildlife (DNPW) Malawi through its Regional Office (N) is also thanked for the logistical support and accommodation throughout the entire study. Special thanks are due to my supervisor - Mr. George Zwide Nxumayo for his invaluable guidance. Mr. Thom McShane should also be thanked in a special way for sharing me some information, and sending me some documents about Vwaza which have contributed a lot to the success of this work. I extend my sincere thanks to the Vwaza Research Unit team for their assistance, especially during the field work.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Page LIST OF ACRONYMS a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Scope of Study 1 1.2 Background – Volta River Authority 2 1.3 Proposed Aboadze-Volta Transmission Line Project (AVTP) 3 1.4 Legal, Regulatory and Policy Considerations 5 1.5 Future developments by VRA 8 2.0 Description of proposed development 10 2.1 Pre-Construction Activities 11 2.2 Construction Phase Activities 12 2.3 Operational Phase Activities 17 2.3.1 Other Operational Considerations 20 3.0 Description of Existing Environments 21 3.1 Bio-Physical Environment 21 3.1.1 Climate 21 3.1.2 Flora 25 3.1.3 Fauna 35 3.1.4 Water Resources 43 3.1.5 Geology and Soils 44 3.1.6 General Land Use 51 3.2 Socio-Economic/Cultural Environment 51 3.2.1 Methodology 53 3.2.2 Profiles of the Districts in the Project Area 54 3.2.2(a) Shama - Ahanta East Metropolitan Area 54 3.2.2(b) Komenda - Edina - Eguafo - Abirem (KEEA) District 58 i 3.2.2(c) Mfantseman District 61 3.2.2(d) Awutu-Effutu-Senya District 63 3.2.2(e) Tema Municipal Area 65 3.2.2(f) Abura-Asebu-Kwamankese 68 3.2.2(g) Ga District 71 3.2.2(h) Gomoa District 74 3.3 Results of Socio-Economic Surveys 77 (Communities, Persons and Property) 3.3.1 Information on Affected Persons and Properties 78 3.3.1.1 Age Distribution of Affected Persons 78 3.3.1.2 Gender Distribution of Affected Persons 79 3.3.1.3 Marital Status of Affected Persons 80 3.3.1.4 Ethnic Composition of Afected Persons 81 3.3.1.5 Household Size/Dependents of Affected Persons 81 3.3.1.6 Religious backgrounds of Affected Persons 82 3.3.2 Economic Indicators
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Epiphytic Orchids of East Africa
    Sphyrarchynchus sp. Cyrtorchis crassifoHa Schltr. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE EPIPHYTIC ORCHIDS OF EAST AFRICA. By W. M. MOREAU AND R. E. MOREAU. C()IYl,tents. 1. Introduction. 2. Nomenclature and classification. 3. General ecology. 4. The orchid flower. 5. Published and unpublished sources of East African records. 6. Tentative field key to the genera. 7. Annotated check-list of species. 1. INTRODUCTION. Over fifteen thousand species of orchids have been described, the vast majority of them tropical, and the greater part of them epiphytic, that is, normally growing on trees without deriving sustenance from them. But little more than ten per cent of the majestic total belong to Tropical Africa and moreover, so far as is known at present, within that area ground orchids predominate over epiphytic in the proportion of more than three to one. There is reason to believe that these figures are a reflection rather of our ignorance than of the truth. Because the Tropical African epiphytic orchids are not characterised by the magni• ficence and opulence of those of other regions, they have not attracted the commercial collector and certainly are most imperfectly known. Yet the local orchids display a delightful diversity of adaptation and of form. None are flamboyant, but many are beautiful, some are exquisitely dainty and a few are bizarre. They appeal to the same feelings and are capable of arousing the same enthusiasms as succulents or alpine plants. Moreover, anyone who takes the comparatively little trouble required to collect and grow them has the additional satisfaction of knowing that he is contributing to scientific knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • English Cop17 Inf. 47 (English Only / Únicamente En Inglés / Seulement En Anglais)
    Original language: English CoP17 Inf. 47 (English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais) CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA Seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South Africa), 24 September – 5 October 2016 TRADE STUDY OF SELECTED EAST AFRICAN TIMBER PRODUCTION SPECIES This document has been submitted by Germany* in relation to agenda items 62, 77 and 88. * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat (or the United Nations Environment Programme) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. CoP17 Inf. 47 – p. 1 Anthony B. Cunningham Trade study of selected east African timber production species BfN-Skripten 445 2016 Trade study of selected east African timber production species Handelsstudie zu ostafrikanischen Holzarten (FKZ 3514 53 2003) Anthony B. Cunnigham Cover picture: A worker of a sawmill in front of Dalbergia melanoxylon logs in Montepuez/Mozambique (A.B. Cunningham) Author’s address: Dr. Anthony B. Cunningham Cunningham Consultancy WA Pty Ltd. 2 Tapper Street Au-6162 Fremantle E-Mail: [email protected] Scientific Supervision at BfN: Dr. Daniel Wolf Division II 1.2 “Plant Conservation“ This publication is included in the literature database “DNL-online” (www.dnl-online.de) BfN-Skripten are not available in book trade. Publisher: Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN) Federal Agency for Nature Conservation Konstantinstrasse 110 53179 Bonn, Germany URL: http://www.bfn.de The publisher takes no guarantee for correctness, details and completeness of statements and views in this report as well as no guarantee for respecting private rights of third parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Survey of Mount Gorongosa
    VEGETATION SURVEY OF MOUNT GORONGOSA Tom Müller, Anthony Mapaura, Bart Wursten, Christopher Chapano, Petra Ballings & Robin Wild 2008 (published 2012) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 23 VEGETATION SURVEY OF MOUNT GORONGOSA Tom Müller, Anthony Mapaura, Bart Wursten, Christopher Chapano, Petra Ballings & Robin Wild 2008 (published 2012) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 23 Biodiversity Foundation for Africa P.O. Box FM730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe Vegetation Survey of Mt Gorongosa, page 2 SUMMARY Mount Gorongosa is a large inselberg almost 700 sq. km in extent in central Mozambique. With a vertical relief of between 900 and 1400 m above the surrounding plain, the highest point is at 1863 m. The mountain consists of a Lower Zone (mainly below 1100 m altitude) containing settlements and over which the natural vegetation cover has been strongly modified by people, and an Upper Zone in which much of the natural vegetation is still well preserved. Both zones are very important to the hydrology of surrounding areas. Immediately adjacent to the mountain lies Gorongosa National Park, one of Mozambique's main conservation areas. A key issue in recent years has been whether and how to incorporate the upper parts of Mount Gorongosa above 700 m altitude into the existing National Park, which is primarily lowland. [These areas were eventually incorporated into the National Park in 2010.] In recent years the unique biodiversity and scenic beauty of Mount Gorongosa have come under severe threat from the destruction of natural vegetation. This is particularly acute as regards moist evergreen forest, the loss of which has accelerated to alarming proportions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnobotany of South African Medicinal Orchids ⁎ M
    South African Journal of Botany 77 (2011) 2–9 www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Review The ethnobotany of South African medicinal orchids ⁎ M. Chinsamy, J.F. Finnie, J. Van Staden Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa Received 22 July 2010; received in revised form 14 September 2010; accepted 28 September 2010 Abstract Orchidaceae, the largest and most diverse family of flowering plants is widespread, with a broad range of ethnobotanical applications. Southern Africa is home to approximately 494 terrestrial and epiphytic orchid species, of which, 49 are used in African traditional medicine to treat cough and diarrheal symptoms, madness, promote conception, relieve pain, induce nausea, and expel intestinal worms and for many cultural practices. The biological activity and chemical composition of South African medicinal orchid species are yet to be explored fully. In this review we highlight the potential for pharmacological research on South African medicinal orchid species based on their traditional medicinal uses. © 2010 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Ethnobotany; Medicinal; Orchidaceae Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................... 2 1.1. Distribution ............................................................ 3 1.2. Ethnobotanical use ........................................................ 3 1.2.1. Medicinal uses
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Floral Structure in Drypetes Vahl (Putranjivaceae) and Related Genera
    A survey of floral structure in Drypetes Vahl (Putranjivaceae) and related genera J. P Tesh Submitted 20.08.2012 Image from Keay, R.W.J. 1958. Scytopetalaceae - Umbelliferae. In Hutchinson, J., Dalziel, JE, eds . Flora of West Tropical Africa (Revised) Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the MSc in the Biodiversity and Taxonomy of Plants Abstract The pan-tropical Drypetes Vahl is a genus of 225 species of predominantly understorey rain forest trees recently segregated from Euphorbiaceae Juss. s.l . and placed within Putranjivaceae Meisn. with Putranjiva and Sibangea . Generic limits within Putranjivaceae remain unclear, notably between Drypetes and Sibangea . Within Drypetes rates of species discovery are high and yet the genus is somewhat neglected in the literature and many herbarium samples remain undetermined. Using herbarium material, this study examined approximately one third of the known species. Consistent floral characters that separate the three genera in Putranjivaceae are sepal shape, aestivation and persistence; stamen and locule numbers; ovary shape; the form of the stigma and the presence or absence of an intrastaminal nectiferous disk. Drypetes exhibits variability in floral characters: stamen number and placement is notably labile, and locule numbers, stigma and disk shapes are variable. Geographical differences in floral characters emerge, but conclusions are tentative in view of the restricted sampling. Limited phylogenetic studies hypothesise that Sibangea is nested within a clade of African Drypetes which argues for further study of this interesting, but neglected, group. Key words: Malpighiales; Euphorbiaceae; Putranjivaceae; Drypetes ; Sibangea ; Putranjiva ; placement; floral morphology; geographical differences; herbarium collections. Acknowledgements I would like to express sincere thanks to my principal supervisor Zoë Goodwin (D.
    [Show full text]
  • Kew Science Publications for the Academic Year 2017–18
    KEW SCIENCE PUBLICATIONS FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2017–18 FOR THE ACADEMIC Kew Science Publications kew.org For the academic year 2017–18 ¥ Z i 9E ' ' . -,i,c-"'.'f'l] Foreword Kew’s mission is to be a global resource in We present these publications under the four plant and fungal knowledge. Kew currently has key questions set out in Kew’s Science Strategy over 300 scientists undertaking collection- 2015–2020: based research and collaborating with more than 400 organisations in over 100 countries What plants and fungi occur to deliver this mission. The knowledge obtained 1 on Earth and how is this from this research is disseminated in a number diversity distributed? p2 of different ways from annual reports (e.g. stateoftheworldsplants.org) and web-based What drivers and processes portals (e.g. plantsoftheworldonline.org) to 2 underpin global plant and academic papers. fungal diversity? p32 In the academic year 2017-2018, Kew scientists, in collaboration with numerous What plant and fungal diversity is national and international research partners, 3 under threat and what needs to be published 358 papers in international peer conserved to provide resilience reviewed journals and books. Here we bring to global change? p54 together the abstracts of some of these papers. Due to space constraints we have Which plants and fungi contribute to included only those which are led by a Kew 4 important ecosystem services, scientist; a full list of publications, however, can sustainable livelihoods and natural be found at kew.org/publications capital and how do we manage them? p72 * Indicates Kew staff or research associate authors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Butterflies of Taita Hills
    FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS A FIELD GUIDE Esther N. Kioko, Alex M. Musyoki, Augustine E. Luanga, Oliver C. Genga & Duncan K. Mwinzi FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS: THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS A FIELD GUIDE TO THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS Esther N. Kioko, Alex M. Musyoki, Augustine E. Luanga, Oliver C. Genga & Duncan K. Mwinzi Supported by the National Museums of Kenya and the JRS Biodiversity Foundation ii FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS: THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS Dedication In fond memory of Prof. Thomas R. Odhiambo and Torben B. Larsen Prof. T. R. Odhiambo’s contribution to insect studies in Africa laid a concrete footing for many of today’s and future entomologists. Torben Larsen’s contribution to the study of butterflies in Kenya and their natural history laid a firm foundation for the current and future butterfly researchers, enthusiasts and rearers. National Museums of Kenya’s mission is to collect, preserve, study, document and present Kenya’s past and present cultural and natural heritage. This is for the purposes of enhancing knowledge, appreciation, respect and sustainable utilization of these resources for the benefit of Kenya and the world, for now and posterity. Copyright © 2021 National Museums of Kenya. Citation Kioko, E. N., Musyoki, A. M., Luanga, A. E., Genga, O. C. & Mwinzi, D. K. (2021). Fluttering beauty with benefits: The butterflies of Taita Hills. A field guide. National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya. ISBN 9966-955-38-0 iii FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS: THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS FOREWORD The Taita Hills are particularly diverse but equally endangered.
    [Show full text]
  • Warburgia Salutaris) in Southern Mozambique
    Uses, Knowledge, and Management of the Threatened Pepper-Bark Tree (Warburgia salutaris) in Southern Mozambique ,1,2 1 3 ANNAE M. SENKORO* ,CHARLIE M. SHACKLETON ,ROBERT A. VOEKS , AND 4,5 ANA I. RIBEIRO 1Department of Environmental Science, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 6140, South Africa 2Departmento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, CP 257, Maputo, Mozambique 3Department of Geography and the Environment, California State University, Fullerton, 800 N. State College Blvd, Fullerton, CA 92831, USA 4Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food (LEAF), Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017, Lisbon, Portugal 5Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, CP 257, Maputo, Mozambique *Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] Uses, Knowledge, and Management of the Threatened Pepper-Bark Tree (Warburgia salutaris)in Southern Mozambique. Warburgia salutaris, the pepper-bark tree, is one of the most highly valued medicinal plant species in southern Africa. Due to its popularity in folk medicine, it is overexploited in many regions and is deemed threatened throughout its range. We identified cultural and social drivers of use, compared knowledge distribution, determined management practices, and explored local ecological knowledge related to the species in the Lebombo Mountains, Tembe River, and Futi Corridor areas in southern Mozambique. Stratified random, semistructured interviews were con- ducted (182), complemented by 17 focus group discussions in the three study areas. W. salutaris was used medicinally to treat 12 health concerns, with the bark being the most commonly used part. Knowledge of the species varied between the three areas, but not with respondent gender or age. Harvesting was mostly through vertical bark stripping (71% of informants).
    [Show full text]
  • Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: an and Taxonomists Throughout the World Who Have Left Inventory
    United States Department of Agriculture Perennial Edible Fruits Agricultural Research Service of the Tropics Agriculture Handbook No. 642 An Inventory t Abstract Acknowledgments Martin, Franklin W., Carl W. Cannpbell, Ruth M. Puberté. We owe first thanks to the botanists, horticulturists 1987 Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: An and taxonomists throughout the world who have left Inventory. U.S. Department of Agriculture, written records of the fruits they encountered. Agriculture Handbook No. 642, 252 p., illus. Second, we thank Richard A. Hamilton, who read and The edible fruits of the Tropics are nnany in number, criticized the major part of the manuscript. His help varied in form, and irregular in distribution. They can be was invaluable. categorized as major or minor. Only about 300 Tropical fruits can be considered great. These are outstanding We also thank the many individuals who read, criti- in one or more of the following: Size, beauty, flavor, and cized, or contributed to various parts of the book. In nutritional value. In contrast are the more than 3,000 alphabetical order, they are Susan Abraham (Indian fruits that can be considered minor, limited severely by fruits), Herbert Barrett (citrus fruits), Jose Calzada one or more defects, such as very small size, poor taste Benza (fruits of Peru), Clarkson (South African fruits), or appeal, limited adaptability, or limited distribution. William 0. Cooper (citrus fruits), Derek Cormack The major fruits are not all well known. Some excellent (arrangements for review in Africa), Milton de Albu- fruits which rival the commercialized greatest are still querque (Brazilian fruits), Enriquito D.
    [Show full text]
  • Genotoxicity and Antigenotoxicity of Selected South African Indigenous Plants
    South African Journal of Botany 114 (2018) 89–99 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect South African Journal of Botany journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Genotoxicity and Antigenotoxicity of selected South African indigenous plants R. Makhuvele a,b,R.G.Matshogaa, R. Antonissen d,L.Pietersc,L.Verschaeved,e,E.E.Elgorashia,b,⁎ a Toxicology and Ethnoveterinary Medicine, Public Health and Zoonosis Programme, Agricultural Research Council-Onderstepoort Veterinary Research, Private Bag X05, Onderstepoort, 0110, South Africa b Department of Paraclinical Sciences, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, Onderstepoort, 0110, South Africa c Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Antwerp, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium d Laboratory of Toxicology, O.D. Public Health and Surveillance, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Juliette Wytsmanstreet 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium e Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium article info abstract Article history: Twenty-two plant species extracted with dichloromethane and 90% methanol were investigated for their Received 5 August 2017 genotoxicity as well as antigenotoxicity against aflatoxin B1 induced-mutagenicity using the Ames (Salmonella Received in revised form 6 October 2017 typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100) and Vitotox assays in the presence of S9 rat liver fraction. The results Accepted 21 October 2017 obtained from Ames assay for some plant extracts correlated well with the results obtained from the Vitotox assay. Dichloromethane and methanolic extracts of Helichrysum petiolare, Protea hybrid, Protea roupelliae, Edited by LJ McGaw Artabotrys brachypetalus (leaves), Friesodielsia obovata, Hexalobus monopetalus, Monanthotaxis caffra, Monodora junodis, Uvaria caffra, Xylopia parviflora, Podocarpus henkellii, Rhoicissus sekhukhuniensis, Podocarpus elongatus Keywords: and Agapanthus praecox had moderate to strong antimutagenic activities in both Ames and Vitotox assays.
    [Show full text]