UTAH PESTS Staff

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UTAH PESTS Staff UTAH PESTS News Utah Plant Pest Diagnostic Laboratory and USU Extension Vol. 11, Spring 2008 Bee Healthy in Utah Bee health is a hot topic in the ento- mology world, and What’s Inside for anyone depend- ing on pollinating Onion Powdery Mildew insects. Most likely many of you have Snow Mold on Turf heard about wide- spread honeybee Carpenter Ants colony death in the United States. The Cankerworm Watch collective term for this poorly under- Preventing Pesticide stood phenomenon Resistance is called Colony Soil and Tissue Fertility Collapse Disorder Testing in Orchards (CCD). Waugsberg, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bienen_auf_Wabe_2.jpg Waugsberg, Calendar of Events, Originally described News, Publications, and in North America in Web Sites of Interest late 2006, CCD is also being observed News Highlights in Europe and possibly in Taiwan. UTAH PESTS NEW To date, there is FACT SHEETS no single cause to The following can be blame for CCD. But found on our Web site: there are a num- Alfalfa Stem Nematode ber of developing theories attempting Beneficial Insects: to explain why hon- Beetles Mantids eybees are suddenly True Bugs dying, including mal- nutrition, pathogens, Black Grass Bugs parasites, pesti- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Drinking_Bee.jpg Bartosz Kosiorek, Human Lice cides and geneti- A normal honeybee hive (above) has capped brood and many adult workers. Fleas cally modified crops. Honeybee drinking nectar (below). CCD could likely Russian Wheat Aphid be a combination abandon a hive until the brood emerges), and Utah Home Orchard of several factors available food stores. In some cases, the hives Pest Management Guide contributing to the rapid decline of bee colony (Revised) appear relatively healthy and include an ac- health. When a honeybee hive crashes, several tive queen, but there just aren’t enough adults Wheat Stripe Rust simultaneous symptoms associated with CCD present in the hive to take care of the immature are often evident, such as a lack of adult bees in brood. the hive, capped brood (bees do not normally www.utahpests.usu.edu Continued on next page Bee Healthy in Utah, continued from page 1 UTAH PESTS Domesticated honeybees in the United sampling for pathogens and parasites. Two of States were introduced from Europe in the the most important problems affecting bee Staff 19th Century. Since 1971, the United States health in Utah include the varroa mite and a has seen a gradual decline in domesticated bacterial disease called American foulbrood. honeybees and a striking decline in native, In 2007, over 3,400 colonies were inspected Diane Alston wild honeybees. Although the number of by members of UDAF. Overall, varroa mites Entomology Specialist beehive colonies are decreasing each year, were prevalent, but disease incidence was [email protected] there is still a huge demand for pollinating low (2.6%). Beekeepers actively try to con- 435-797-2516 insects in agriculture and horticulture. Hon- trol mites and harmful bacteria so that the eybees are responsible for about one-third hives are in optimal health. Ryan Davis of pollinated crops in the United States, with Arthropod Diagnostician total production values exceeding $15 billion The exact reason for CCD is still unknown. [email protected] each year. Almonds, for example, are worth Fortunately, CCD has not been detected in 435-797-2435 over $1.5 billion and depend on honeybees Utah beehives. The Colony Collapse Disor- for pollination. Honeybees also pollinate der Working Group, primarily based at Penn Kent Evans apples, blackberries, cherries, cucumbers, State University, is leading the research to Plant Pathology Specialist peaches, raspberries and watermelons. In stop CCD and improve bee health. To learn [email protected] Utah, the honey industry is worth more than more about CCD, visit http://en.wikipedia. 435-797-2504 $1 million each year. org/wiki/Colony_Collapse_Disorder. Local beekeeping clubs can also provide specific Erin Frank The Utah Department of Agriculture and information for colony health, pest control, Plant Disease Diagnostician Food (UDAF) monitors for bee health every and marketing bee byproducts. [email protected] year. Bee inspectors not only survey for 435-797-2435 the number of active hives within the state, but also assess the health of each colony by -Erin Hodgson, Extension Entomologist Erin Hodgson Entomology Specialist [email protected] NEWS from THE diagnostic LAB 435-797-5689 UPPDL Hires New Plant Disease Marion Murray IPM Project Leader Diagnostician Editor, Utah Pests News [email protected] Erin Frank grew up in northeastern Colo- Erin will process all plant disease submissions 435-797-0776 rado and attended Colorado State University and also provide customized management where she completed her Bachelor of Sci- guidelines for the Utah Plant Pest Diagnostic ence degree in 2004. Her major was Soil and Lab. Utah Plant Pest Crop Science with a concentration in Plant Diagnostic Lab Breeding and Genetics. In 2005 she moved BNR Room 203 to Manhattan, Kansas, where she began Utah State University 5305 Old Main Hill working on her Master of Science degree Logan, UT 84322 at Kansas State University. Her research in- volved studying gene expression of the prai- rie grass big bluestem in response to drought Utah Pests News and rust infection. She also had a second is published quarterly by the project which involved molecular studies of UTAH PESTS staff. a fungal isolate found in bison saliva. Erin defended her Master’s thesis in June 2007 utahpests.usu.edu and received her Master of Science degree in Plant Pathology. She continued working in the same lab finishing up her other projects USU Extension welcomes Erin Frank to the before moving to Logan in January. UPPDL. www.utahpests.usu.edu Utah Pests News - Spring 2008 - page 2 PLANT pathologY NEWS AND information Onion Powdery Mildew – Should We Worry? Although considered a minor disease Early infection symptoms appear as on onions, powdery mildew is show- whitish lesions on leaves and later, ing up in more onion fields in the when conditions are conducive, the western United States. The disease fungus will produce visible myceli- does not appear to be of major con- um (Figure 1) with prolific num- cern at present. In Utah, occurrences bers of spores (Figure 2). Primary of the disease have been more notice- spores, called conidia, are pointed able and prevalent in the latter part of or lanceolate (Figure 3) and sec- the season, after crops have matured. ondary spores are more cylindrical Consequently, crop yields have not and rounded on the proximal ends been significantly affected. (Figure 4). While there are no recommenda- The pathogen can survive from one tions for chemical control, there are season to another in crop resi- reports that some onion cultivars are dues, serving as inoculum to infect more susceptible than others. I am susceptible crops the following unaware of any onion breeding pro- season. It can also be introduced gram actively screening for resistance into an area on infected planting to the disease; however, there are stock. Keep your eyes peeled for likely onion breeders doing prelimi- this disease. How ever you slice it, nary investigations. my belief is that powdery mildew on onion is not worth shedding Onion powdery mildew is caused by tears over just yet. Figure 1. Visible mycelium of the powdery mildew the fungal pathogen, Leveillula taurica fungus on onion. (Lev.) G. Arnaud. This pathogen has -Kent Evans, Extension the ability to cause disease on over Plant Pathologist 1,000 different plant species including onions, eggplant, tomatoes, potatoes, peppers, and cucumbers. The patho- gen was first noted in the U.S. in Florida in the mid 1970s, then later in California. It was observed in Wash- ington in 1996 and over the years has appeared infrequently according to a publication by Dr. Lindsey du Toit in the online Plant Health Progress jour- nal (http://www.plantmanagementnet- work.org/pub/php/brief/2004/onion/). Figure 2 (above right). The du Toit’s report describes the disease fungus that causes powdery on onions in a variety trial planted in mildew (Leveillula taurica) Washington; however, the pathogen forms prolific spores on plant was also detected in Idaho at about tissue. the same time. Figure 3 (right). The Powdery mildew has been reported primary spores (conidia) are on onions in Israel, southeastern lanceolate. Europe, and California. In Utah, Extension Vegetable Specialist Dr. Dan Figure 4 (far right). Sec- Drost identified the disease on onion ondary spores are more grown in a Box Elder County variety cylindrical and rounded. trial in September 2007. www.utahpests.usu.edu Utah Pests News - Spring 2008 - page PLANT pathologY NEWS AND information, cont. Watch for “Moldy” Turf This Spring With all our snow this year, get ready for snow mold to appear in residential lawns and turf areas of parks, businesses, and golf courses. Snow molds are fungi that are psychrophilic, or cold-loving, and will attack plants under a layer of snow. Two of the most common snow molds are pink snow mold, caused by the fungus Micro- dochium nivale, and gray snow mold, caused by Typhula incarnata and T. ishikariensis. Both pink and gray snow molds can occur together and almost all turfgrass spe- cies are susceptible to both diseases. Pink snow mold will survive unfavorable conditions in infected plants and debris of previously infected leaves. The fungus will grow slowly at first, allowing infected Wisconsin-Madison of University turf to go undetected for a long period of time. Once conditions are favorably wet and overcast with cool Gray snow mold (above) temperatures, the fungus will spread very rapidly. Sunny typically appears as tan to and dry conditions cause the pathogen to become inac- brown patches on turf, with tive.
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Influences of Trees on Abundance of Natural Enemies of Insect Pests: a Review*
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications Agronomy and Horticulture Department 1995 Influences of rT ees on Abundance of Natural Enemies of Insect Pests: A Review Mary Ellen Dix United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service R. J. Johnson University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Mark O. Harrell University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Ronald M. Case University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Robert J. Wright University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Dix, Mary Ellen; Johnson, R. J.; Harrell, Mark O.; Case, Ronald M.; Wright, Robert J.; Hodges, Laurie; Brandle, James R.; Schoeneberger, Michelle M.; Sunderman, N. J.; Fitzmaurice, R. L.; Young, Linda J.; and Hubbard, Kenneth G., "Influences of rT ees on Abundance of Natural Enemies of Insect Pests: A Review" (1995). Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications. 412. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/412 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agronomy and Horticulture Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Mary Ellen Dix, R. J. Johnson, Mark O. Harrell, Ronald M. Case, Robert J. Wright, Laurie Hodges, James R. Brandle, Michelle M. Schoeneberger, N. J. Sunderman, R. L. Fitzmaurice, Linda J. Young, and Kenneth G. Hubbard This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ agronomyfacpub/412 Dix, Johnson, Harrell, Case, Wright, Hodges, Brandle, Schoenberger, Sunderman, Fitzmaurice, Young & Hubbard in Agroforestry Systems 29 (1995) Agroforestry Systems 29: 303-311, 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Roosevelt Wild Life Bulletins the Roosevelt Wild Life Station
    SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry Digital Commons @ ESF Roosevelt Wild Life Bulletins The Roosevelt Wild Life Station 1926 Roosevelt Wild Life Bulletin Charles C. Adams SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.esf.edu/rwlsbulletin Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Adams, Charles C., "Roosevelt Wild Life Bulletin" (1926). Roosevelt Wild Life Bulletins. 23. https://digitalcommons.esf.edu/rwlsbulletin/23 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the The Roosevelt Wild Life Station at Digital Commons @ ESF. It has been accepted for inclusion in Roosevelt Wild Life Bulletins by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ ESF. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. VOLUME 4 OCTOBER, 1926 NUMBER 1 Roosevelt Wild Life Bulletin OF THE Roosevelt Wild Life Forest Experiment Station OF The New York State College of Forestry AT Syracuse University RELATION OF BIRDS TO WOODLOTS CONTENTS OF ROOSEVELT WILD LIFE BULLETIN (To obtain these publications see announcement on back of title page.) Roosevelt Wild Life Bulletin, Vol. i, No. i. December, 192 1. 1. Foreword Dr. George Bird Grinnell. 2. Roosevelt Wild Life State Memorial Dr. Charles C. Adams. 3. Appropriateness and Appreciation of the Roosevelt Wild Life Memorial Dr. Charles C. Adams. 4. Suggestions for Research on North American Big Game and Fur- Bearing Animals Dr. Charles C. Adams. 5. Theodore Roosevelt Sir Harry H. Johnston. 6. Roosevelt's Part in Forestry Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Cankerworms Marion S
    Published by Utah State University Extension and Utah Plant Pest Diagnostic Laboratory ENT-119-08 March 2020 Cankerworms Marion S. Murray Erin W. Hodgson IPM Project Leader Extension Entomology Specialist What You Should Know • Both spring and fall cankerworms occur sporadically in Utah, typically on a five to seven year cycle. • Larvae feed for six weeks in the spring and cause heavy defoliation in outbreak years. • Treatment is often not warranted for most years; however, using Bacillus thuringiensis or spinosad before larvae exceed 1/2 inch is an effective control option. ankerworms, also known as inchworms, are in 2 the order Lepidoptera and family Geometridae. Fig. 2. Fall cankerworm feeding damage. CGeometrid moth adults have slender bodies and relatively large, broad forewings (Figs. 1, 3). Both Hosts and Life Cycle fall, Alsophila pometaria, and spring, Paleacrita vernata, cankerworms occur in Utah, with the fall cankerworm Fall and spring cankerworm larvae feed on a wide being most common. Insect outbreaks are periodic variety of hardwood tree foliage including apple, ash, and concentrated in urban areas or near deciduous red and white oaks, maple (including boxelder), elm, woodlands, and can cause complete defoliation of cherry, linden, and honeylocust (Fig. 2). trees in early spring. Both cankerworm species are native to deciduous forests of North America, and Cankerworms have one generation per year. Eggs have many natural enemies that regulate outbreak hatch in early spring soon after bud break (about populations. Typically, the cankerworm population will 148-290 degree days after January 1, at 50˚F lower increase to an upper limit where it will remain for 2 to 3 developmental threshold).
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Assemblages in a North American Sub-Boreal Forest
    Forest Ecology and Management 256 (2008) 1104–1123 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Catastrophic windstorm and fuel-reduction treatments alter ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in a North American sub-boreal forest Kamal J.K. Gandhi a,b,1, Daniel W. Gilmore b,2, Steven A. Katovich c, William J. Mattson d, John C. Zasada e,3, Steven J. Seybold a,b,* a Department of Entomology, 219 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell Avenue, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA b Department of Forest Resources, 115 Green Hall, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA c USDA Forest Service, State and Private Forestry, 1992 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA d USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 5985 Hwy K, Rhinelander, WI 54501, USA e USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 1831 Hwy 169E, Grand Rapids, MN 55744, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: We studied the short-term effects of a catastrophic windstorm and subsequent salvage-logging and Received 9 September 2007 prescribed-burning fuel-reduction treatments on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in a Received in revised form 8 June 2008 sub-borealforestinnortheasternMinnesota,USA. During2000–2003, 29,873groundbeetlesrepresentedby Accepted 9 June 2008 71 species were caught in unbaited and baited pitfall traps in aspen/birch/conifer (ABC) and jack pine (JP) cover types. At the family level, both land-area treatment and cover type had significant effects on ground Keywords: beetle trap catches, but there were no effects of pinenes and ethanol as baits.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Cankerworm
    Pest Profile Photo credit: David Keith & Tim Miller, UNL Entomology Extension Common Name: Fall Cankerworm Scientific Name: Alsophila pometaria Order and Family: Lepidoptera, Geometridae Size and Appearance: Length (mm) Appearance Egg dark grayish-brown with a dot and a ring 1.0 mm on top Larva/Nymph vary between light green and dark 25.0 mm (mature larvae) brownish-green have white lines running down their body from the head to the tip of the abdomen dark-brownish green caterpillars have a black stripe the length of their back Adult males are small, have wings, and are grayish color with some white lines along 25.0 – 35.0 mm (male the wings wingspread) females have a grayish colored body and 10.0 – 12.0 mm (female) wingless Pupa (if applicable) yellow to yellow-green in color wrapped in a silken cocoon Type of feeder (Chewing, sucking, etc.): Chewing (caterpillar) Host plant/s: black cherry, basswood, red and white oaks, beech, ash, boxelder, elm, sugar and red maples Description of Damage (larvae and adults): When the larvae are young, they eat on the underside of the leaves, making the leaf appear skeletonized. As the larvae get older, they cause more damage by eating almost the whole leaf. In some cases, the damage is to the extent of defoliation of the tree, especially in severe cases of outbreaks. Sometimes in bad outbreaks, these caterpillars can defoliate many trees. References: Ciesla, M, W. & Asaro, C (2016) Fall Crankerworm. Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 182. Published by U.S. Deparment of Agriculture- Forest Service. Portland, Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2017/023486 Al 9 February 2017 (09.02.2017) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2017/023486 Al 9 February 2017 (09.02.2017) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: 0552 (US). FENGLER, Kevin; 7250 NW 62nd Ave, P.O. AOlH l/00 (2006.01) C07K 14/195 (2006.01) Box 552, Johnston, IA 5013 1-0552 (US). SCHEPERS, A01H3/00 (2006.01) C12N 15/82 (2006.01) Eric; 7250 NW 62nd Ave, P.O. Box 552, Johnston, IA 5013 1-0552 (US). UDRANSZKY, Ingrid; 7250 NW 62nd (21) International Application Number: Ave, P.O. Box 552, Johnston, IA 5013 1-0552 (US). PCT/US20 16/04 1452 (74) Agent: BAUER, S., Christopher; Pioneer Hi-Bred Inter (22) International Filing Date: national, Inc., 7100 N.W. 62nd Avenue, Johnston, IA 8 July 2016 (08.07.2016) 5013 1-1014 (US). (25) Filing Language: English (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (26) Publication Language: English kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, (30) Priority Data: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, 62/201,977 6 August 2015 (06.08.2015) US DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (71) Applicants: PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, INC. [US/US]; PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, INC., 7100 N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutritional Ecology of the Carpenter Ant Camponotus Pennsylvanicus (De Geer): Macronutrient Preference and Particle Consumption
    Nutritional Ecology of the Carpenter Ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer): Macronutrient Preference and Particle Consumption Colleen A. Cannon Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology Richard D. Fell, Chairman Jeffrey R. Bloomquist Richard E. Keyel Charles Kugler Donald E. Mullins June 12, 1998 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: diet, feeding behavior, food, foraging, Formicidae Copyright 1998, Colleen A. Cannon Nutritional Ecology of the Carpenter Ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer): Macronutrient Preference and Particle Consumption Colleen A. Cannon (ABSTRACT) The nutritional ecology of the black carpenter ant, Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer) was investigated by examining macronutrient preference and particle consumption in foraging workers. The crops of foragers collected in the field were analyzed for macronutrient content at two-week intervals through the active season. Choice tests were conducted at similar intervals during the active season to determine preference within and between macronutrient groups. Isolated individuals and small social groups were fed fluorescent microspheres in the laboratory to establish the fate of particles ingested by workers of both castes. Under natural conditions, foragers chiefly collected carbohydrate and nitrogenous material. Carbohydrate predominated in the crop and consisted largely of simple sugars. A small amount of glycogen was present. Carbohydrate levels did not vary with time. Lipid levels in the crop were quite low. The level of nitrogen compounds in the crop was approximately half that of carbohydrate, and exhibited seasonal dependence. Peaks in nitrogen foraging occurred in June and September, months associated with the completion of brood rearing in Camponotus.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSEHOLD ARTHROPODS Nuisance Household Jean R
    2015 Household Pests 2/22/2015 OVERVIEW Guidelines & Principles Groups of pests Public health pests HOUSEHOLD ARTHROPODS Nuisance Household Jean R. Natter Structural pests 2015 2 MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES DETERMINE MANAGEMENT Define the problem Eradicate? Damage? Critter(s)? Control? ID the critter Manage? Pest? Tolerate? Dangerous? (people, pets, or structures?) Did it just stumble indoors? Verify: PNW Insect Management Handbook Appropriate management 3 4 CAPTURE THE CRITTER RECOMMENDATIONS Research-based management EPA says: Pest control materials must be labeled for that purpose * * * * * * * * * * (Common Sense Pest Control) No home remedies 5 6 Jean R. Natter 2015 Household Pests 1 2015 Household Pests 2/22/2015 PUBLIC HEALTH: BED BUGS 3/16” Broadly flat, oval Cracks, crevices, & PUBLIC HEALTH PESTS seams (naturephoto.cz.com) Eggs glued in place Blood feeders (Bed Bugs; WSU; FS070E) Bites w/o pain Odor: sweet; acrid Bed Bugs (FS070E) 7 (J. R. Natter) 8 MANAGEMENT: BED BUGS PUBLIC HEALTH: MOSQUITOES Key Points Mattress: Encase or heat Rx Launder bedding, clothes – hot! Pest control company (NY Times) (L & R: University of Missouri; gambusia Stamford University) 9 10 MANAGEMENT: MOSQUITOES PUBLIC HEALTH: FLEAS Key Points Adults on animal Eggs drop off Source reduction Larvae ½” Personal protection w/tan head Mosquito fish (Gambusia), if legal Larvae eat debris Rx for larvae: Bti Pupa “waits” (Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis) Nest parasites (University of Illinois) 11 12 Jean R. Natter 2015 Household Pests 2 2015 Household Pests 2/22/2015 MANAGEMENT: FLEAS PUBLIC HEALTH: TICKS Rocky Mountain wood tick Key Points 3-step program Dermacentor species 1. Vacuum often East of Cascades 2. Insect growth regulator (IGR) Immatures feed mostly on carpet & pet’s “nest” on rodents 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Forest Service MAINE DEPARTMENT OF
    Maine Forest Service ● MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION FALL CANKERWORM Alsophila pometaria (Harris) Insect and Disease Laboratory ● 168 State House Station ● 50 Hospital Street ● Augusta, Maine ● 04333­0168 Damage This important pest of forest and shade trees occurs generally throughout most of Northeastern America where it feeds on a variety of hardwoods. Damage is first noticed in early May when feeding by the tiny larvae known as "cankerworms," "loopers," "inchworms" or "measuring worms" on the opening buds and expanding leaves causes the foliage to be skeletonized. Later as the larvae mature all but the midrib (and veins) of leaves are devoured. Occasional outbreaks of this pest in Maine have caused severe defoliation of oak and elm. The outbreaks are most often localized and usually last three to four years before natural control factors cause the population to collapse. Trees subjected to two or more years of heavy defoliation may be seriously damaged, especially weaker trees or trees growing on poor sites. Hosts Its preferred hosts are oak, elm and apple, but it also occurs on maple, beech, ash, poplar, box elder, basswood, and cherry. Description and Habits The wingless, greyish­brown female cankerworm moths emerge from the duff with the onset of cold weather in October and November and crawl up the tree trunks. The male moth is greyish­brown with a one inch wing span. Males can often be seen flitting through infested stands during the day or warmer nights during hunting season. The females are not often seen. Females deposit their eggs in single­layered compact masses of 100 or more on the bark of smaller branches and twigs of trees often high in the crown from October to early December.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs
    INSECTS THAT FEED ON COLORADO TREES AND SHRUBS1 Whitney Cranshaw David Leatherman Boris Kondratieff Bulletin 506A TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFOLIATORS .................................................... 8 Leaf Feeding Caterpillars .............................................. 8 Cecropia Moth ................................................ 8 Polyphemus Moth ............................................. 9 Nevada Buck Moth ............................................. 9 Pandora Moth ............................................... 10 Io Moth .................................................... 10 Fall Webworm ............................................... 11 Tiger Moth ................................................. 12 American Dagger Moth ......................................... 13 Redhumped Caterpillar ......................................... 13 Achemon Sphinx ............................................. 14 Table 1. Common sphinx moths of Colorado .......................... 14 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth ....................................... 15 1. Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension etnomologist and associate professor, entomology; David Leatherman, entomologist, Colorado State Forest Service; Boris Kondratieff, associate professor, entomology. 8/93. ©Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1994. For more information, contact your county Cooperative Extension office. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Conditions in Ontario, 2017
    Forest Health Conditions in Ontario, 2017 Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Forest Health Conditions in Ontario, 2017 Compiled by: • Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Science and Research Branch © 2018, Queen’s Printer for Ontario Printed in Ontario, Canada Find the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry on-line at: <http://www.ontario.ca>. For more information about forest health monitoring in Ontario visit the natural resources website: <http://ontario.ca/page/forest-health-conditions> Some of the information in this document may not be compatible with assistive technologies. If you need any of the information in an alternate format, please contact [email protected]. Cette publication hautement spécialisée Forest Health Conditions in Ontario, 2017 n'est disponible qu'en anglais en vertu du Règlement 671/92 qui en exempte l’application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en français, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère des Richesses naturelles au <[email protected]>. ISSN 1913-617X (Online) ISBN 978-1-4868-2275-1 (2018, pdf) Contents Contributors ........................................................................................................................ 4 État de santé des forêts 2017 ............................................................................................. 5 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 6 Contributors Weather patterns ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]