DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Klamath River Recreation Facilities Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Klamath River Recreation Facilities Plan Klamath River Renewal Project Draft Klamath River Recreation Facilities Plan September 2019 2 Table of Contents Klamath River Renewal Project Klamath River Recreation Facilities Plan Prepared for: Klamath River Renewal Corporation Prepared by: KRRC Technical Representatives: AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 400 Oakland, California 94612 Anne Ferguson Jordan Secter Chris Hargreaves Dick Rol Alex Remar CDM Smith 2295 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 250 Sacramento, California 95833 Chris Park Terichael Office September 2019 3 Klamath River Renewal Project Klamath River Recreation Facilities Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 10 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Recreation Facilities Plan Goal and Objectives ............................................................................. 11 1.3 Relationship to Other Plans ............................................................................................................ 12 1.4 Recreation Facilities Plan Organization .......................................................................................... 13 2. Existing Conditions ............................................................................ 15 2.1 Klamath River Area .......................................................................................................................... 15 2.2 Lower Klamath Project .................................................................................................................... 17 2.3 Keno Development .......................................................................................................................... 18 2.4 J.C. Boyle Development ................................................................................................................... 20 J.C. Boyle Reservoir ......................................................................................................... 20 J.C. Boyle Bypass Reach ................................................................................................. 21 Hell’s Corner Reach ......................................................................................................... 24 2.5 Copco No. 1 and No. 2 Development ............................................................................................. 26 Copco Lake ...................................................................................................................... 26 Copco No. 2 Reservoir..................................................................................................... 28 Copco No. 2 Bypass Reach ............................................................................................. 28 2.6 Iron Gate Development ................................................................................................................... 29 Iron Gate Reservoir ......................................................................................................... 29 3. Project Description and Anticipated River Conditions ................... 33 3.1 Project Description .......................................................................................................................... 33 3.2 Anticipated River Conditions ........................................................................................................... 33 Keno Development .......................................................................................................... 34 J.C. Boyle Development ................................................................................................... 36 Copco No. 1 and No. 2 Development ............................................................................. 38 Iron Gate Development ................................................................................................... 38 4. Approach to Existing Recreation Facilities ..................................... 41 4.1 Proposed Recreation Site Removal or Modification within the FERC Project Boundary ............. 41 4.2 Anticipated Recreation Site Disposition Outside the FERC Project Boundary ............................. 45 5. Recreation User Safety During Deconstruction .............................. 49 4 Table of Contents September 2019 Klamath River Renewal Project Klamath River Recreation Facilities Plan 5.1 Visitor Safety Measures During Deconstruction Activities ............................................................ 49 5.2 Communication Protocols ............................................................................................................... 49 5.3 Recreational Access During Deconstruction .................................................................................. 50 6. Planning Direction for Potential River Recreation Sites ................ 52 7. Recreation Site Modifications, New Sites and Amenities, and Other Ideas: Identification and Screening ............................................... 55 7.1 Identification of Potential Recreation Site Modifications, New Sites and Amenities, and Other Ideas ....................................................................................................................................... 55 7.2 Screening and Evaluation Process ................................................................................................. 56 7.3 Evaluation Results ........................................................................................................................... 57 8. Potential Modified and New Recreation Sites ................................ 66 8.1 Design Principles ............................................................................................................................. 67 8.2 Design Program Objectives ............................................................................................................. 69 8.3 Pioneer Park West River Access Site .............................................................................................. 69 Setting .............................................................................................................................. 69 Description ....................................................................................................................... 70 Conceptual Design .......................................................................................................... 73 8.4 Moonshine Falls River Access Site ................................................................................................. 74 Setting .............................................................................................................................. 74 Description ....................................................................................................................... 74 Conceptual Design .......................................................................................................... 78 8.5 Copco Valley River Access Site ....................................................................................................... 79 Setting .............................................................................................................................. 79 Description ....................................................................................................................... 79 Conceptual Design .......................................................................................................... 83 8.6 Copco No. 2 Powerhouse River Access Site .................................................................................. 84 Setting .............................................................................................................................. 84 Description ....................................................................................................................... 84 Conceptual Design .......................................................................................................... 88 8.7 Camp Creek River Access Site ........................................................................................................ 89 Setting .............................................................................................................................. 89 Description ....................................................................................................................... 89 Conceptual Design .......................................................................................................... 92 8.8 Iron Gate River Access Site ............................................................................................................. 93 September 2019 Table of Contents 5 Klamath River Renewal Project Klamath River Recreation Facilities Plan Setting .............................................................................................................................. 93 Description ....................................................................................................................... 93 Conceptual Design .......................................................................................................... 96 9. References ......................................................................................... 98 Appendix A – Recreation Modification Idea Identification ................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project Nos. 2082-062 and 14803-000
    162 FERC ¶ 61,236 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Kevin J. McIntyre, Chairman; Cheryl A. LaFleur, Neil Chatterjee, Robert F. Powelson, and Richard Glick. PacifiCorp Project Nos. 2082-062 and 14803-000 ORDER AMENDING LICENSE AND DEFERRING CONSIDERATION OF TRANSFER APPLICATION (Issued March 15, 2018) On September 23, 2016, and supplemented on March 1, June 23, December 1, and December 4, 2017, PacifiCorp, licensee for the Klamath Hydroelectric Project No. 2082,1 together with the Klamath River Renewal Corporation (Renewal Corporation), filed an application to amend and partially transfer the project license from PacifiCorp to the Renewal Corporation. Specifically, PacifiCorp and the Renewal Corporation propose that PacifiCorp’s existing license be amended to administratively remove four developments, create and administratively place the four developments into a new license for the Lower Klamath Project No. 14803, and transfer the Lower Klamath Project No. 14803 license to the Renewal Corporation. For the reasons discussed below, we grant the application to amend the project license, and defer our decision on the proposed partial license transfer. I. Background The 169-megawatt (MW) Klamath Project is located primarily on the Klamath River in Klamath County, Oregon and Siskiyou County, California and includes federal lands administered by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The project consists of eight developments: seven developments with hydroelectric generation and one non-generating development. From upstream to downstream, the eight developments are the East Side, West Side, Keno (non-generating), J.C. Boyle, Copco No. 1, Copco No.
    [Show full text]
  • Klamath Echoes
    KLAMATH ECHOES '· "' ., , . Sanctioned by Klamath County Historical Society NUMBER 11 lo&t of the Oregon Stoge Compony cooche& stored ot the west end of Klamoth Avenue, Klomoth Foils, in the foil of 1908. - Priell Photo OLD STAGECOACH WHEEL Old sragc:coach whcd all cuvered wich dusr, Spokes weather beaten, iron work all rust, Your travels are over, I know how you feel, Old age has us hobbled, Old Stagecoach Wheel. Together in youth, our range rhe wide west, Each day a rough road, each night glad to rest. In the evening of I ife, my thoughts often steal To those days long ago, Old Stagecoach Wheel. You sang of your travels, a tale of the road, The rocks and the sand, the weight of the load. How dry were your axles, your voice would reveal, And l answered your cry, Old Stagecoach Wheel. At Beswick Hotel we listened, as evening grew still, You told of your coming from old Topsy Hill. Arrival at change stations and every meal, Depended on you, Old Stagecoach Wheel. Sometimes we gathered when days work was done, Told of the day's struggles under boi ling hot sun. White resting our horses, and talking a big deal, We leaned on you, Old Stagecoach Wheel. Final meeting of the Oregon • California stages on their last run over the Siskiyou Mountains on December 17th, 1887 near the summit. -Courtesy Siskiyou County Museum DEDICATION Wtdtdicatuhis, tht 11thimuofKLAMATH ECHOES to tht mtmory ofall Pionur Klamath Country Stagt and uam Frtight drivm, eht •Knights of tht Wbip," 1863- 1909. To you whost courag( ltd you through triaLs and hard­ ships, fought and won.
    [Show full text]
  • 10.0 Screening Level Determination of Chemical Contaminants in Fish Tissue in Selected Project Reservoirs
    10.0 SCREENING LEVEL DETERMINATION OF CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS IN FISH TISSUE IN SELECTED PROJECT RESERVOIRS 10.1 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE Past activities in and around Lake Ewauna and other locations in Keno reservoir suggest that sediments in the reservoir may be contaminated with agricultural chemical residue, poly- chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and trace metals including mercury. While it is unknown whether the Klamath Hydroelectric Project has contributed to the potential sources of sediment contaminants, it is possible that accumulation of potentially contaminated sediments in Project reservoirs has resulted in conditions conducive to bioaccumulation of such contaminants. Both Oregon1 and California2 have water quality standards concerning bioaccumulation of toxic substances. Therefore, the water quality agencies of both states requested that studies be done to determine whether bioaccumulation of potentially toxic contaminants was occurring. The purpose of this study was to determine if edible fish in the Project reservoirs contain unaccept- ably high residues of potentially toxic contaminants. 10.2 OBJECTIVE This study is intended to be a Tier I (screening level) study of the Project reservoirs. The primary aim of the study was to identify whether certain fish species are bioaccumulating toxic substances at levels that may adversely affect public health or wildlife via fish consumption, or be harmful to aquatic life (based on existing quality criteria/guidelines for the protection of human health, wildlife, and aquatic life). Locations were sampled where fishing is practiced, including areas where various types of fishing are conducted routinely (e.g., from a pier, from shore, or from private and commercial boats), thereby exposing a significant number of people to potentially adverse health effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit E: Botanical and Wildlife Resources
    E5.0 BOTANICAL AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES This section on the terrestrial resources (plants and wildlife) associated with the Klamath Hydroelectric Project (Project) contains the following elements: • A description of the existing botanical and wildlife resources in the study area (see Figure E5.1-1) • A discussion of agency consultation related to terrestrial resources • Summaries of the studies conducted by PacifiCorp on wildlife and vegetation • A summary of proposed enhancement measures • A discussion of continuing impacts E5.1 HISTORICAL TERRESTRIAL RESOURCES The terrestrial resources in the Project vicinity historically have been affected by humans for a long period of time. Much of the information on Native American use of the Klamath River Canyon comes from the archaeological investigations conducted by Gleason (2001). Native Americans have been part of the Klamath River ecosystem for at least the last 7,500 years (Gleason, 2001). The Upland Takelma, Shasta, Klamath, and Modoc tribes all used various portions of the study area; the Yurok Tribe historically used the lands along the Lower Klamath River. Before settlement by Europeans, Native Americans affected terrestrial resources through clearing vegetation for villages; harvesting plants and animals for food, medicine, and other uses; and using fire to manage vegetation. The most intensive uses occurred close to the river. Apparently, many of the flat terraces in the canyon were used at one time or another as village- sized settlements. The existing Topsy Grade Road is near the site of a Native American trail. Beginning in about 1870, homesteaders established ranches in the Klamath River Canyon. Apparently, the canyon was mostly unoccupied by any Native American tribes after this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulated Effects of Dam Removal on Water Temperatures Along the Klamath River, Oregon and California, Using 2010 Biological Opinion Flow Requirements
    Simulated Effects of Dam Removal on Water Temperatures along the Klamath River, Oregon and California, Using 2010 Biological Opinion Flow Requirements By John C. Risley, Scott J. Brewer, and Russell W. Perry Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Open-File Report 2011–1311 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Iron Gate Reservoir on the Klamath River in California (Photograph by John Risley, U.S. Geological Survey, October 2005.) Simulated Effects of Dam Removal on Water Temperatures along the Klamath River, Oregon and California, Using 2010 Biological Opinion Flow Requirements By John C. Risley, Scott J. Brewer, and Russell W. Perry Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Open-File Report 2011–1311 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK– USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Risley, J.C., Brewer, S.J., and Perry, R.W., 2012, Simulated effects of dam removal on water temperatures along the Klamath River, Oregon and California, using 2010 Biological Opinion flow requirements: U.S. Geological Survey Open- File Report 2011–1311, 18 p.
    [Show full text]
  • 11511400 Copco Lake Near Copco, CA Klamath River Basin
    Water-Data Report 2008 11511400 Copco Lake near Copco, CA Klamath River Basin LOCATION.--Lat 41°5846, long 122°2000 referenced to North American Datum of 1927, in SE ¼ SW ¼ sec.29, T.48 N., R.4 W., Siskiyou County, CA, Hydrologic Unit 18010206, 12.7 mi northeast of Hornbrook. DRAINAGE AREA.--4,300 mi², approximately (not including Lost River, Butte Creek, or Lower Klamath Lake Basins). SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--October 1967 to current year (monthend contents only). GAGE.--Pressure device and telemark read once daily. Datum of gage is NGVD of 1929 (levels by PacifiCorp, formerly Pacific Power and Light Co.). Monthend contents computed from capacity table provided by Pacific Power and Light Co., dated Aug. 25, 1964. COOPERATION.--Records were provided by PacifiCorp, formerly Pacific Power and Light Co., in connection with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project no. 2082. Contents not rounded to U.S. Geological Survey standards. REMARKS.--Lake is formed by gravity-type dam completed in 1922. Usable capacity, 17,107 acre-ft, between elevations 2,607.5 ft, top of tainter gates, and 2,588.5 ft, invert to powerplant intake. Dead storage, 29,760 acre-ft, below elevation 2,588.5 ft. Figures given represent total contents at 0800 hours. Lake is used for power generation. See schematic diagram of Klamath River and Trinity River Basins available from the California Water Science Center. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--(at 0800 hours) Maximum contents, 46,869 acre-ft, July 26, 2004, elevation, 2,607.50 ft; minimum since first filling, 30,360 acre-ft, Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Hornbrook Formation, Southern Oregon and Northern California
    Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Hornbrook Formation, Southern Oregon and Northern California U.S. GEOLOaieAk SURVEY PROFESSI0 JJAl FAFER Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Hornbrook Formation, Southern Oregon and Northern California By TOR H. NILSEN U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1521 A stratigraphic division of the Hornbrook Formation into five nonmarine and marine members UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Illustrations edited by Dale Russell and prepared by Michelle Coveau Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Nilsen, Tor Helge. Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Hornbrook Formation, southern Oregon and northern California / by Tor H. Nilsen. p. cm. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1521) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1521 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cretaceous. 2. Geology California. 3. Geology Oregon. 4. Hornbrook Formation (Calif, and Or.) I. Title. II. Series. QE685.N55 1993 551.7'7'097952 dc20 , 93-3585 CIP For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25286, Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract________________________________ __ 1 Stratigraphic subdivisions of the Hornbrook Formation Introduction 1 Continued Previous work 5 Rocky Gulch Sandstone
    [Show full text]
  • Klamath River Sonar Integration with Topobathymetric Lidar Technical Data Report
    November 4, 2019 Klamath River Sonar Integration with Topobathymetric LiDAR Technical Data Report David (DJ) Bandrowski, P.E. QSI Corvallis Senior Project Engineer 1100 NE Circle Blvd, Suite 126 Yurok Tribe Fisheries Department Corvallis, OR 97330 PO Box 1027 PH: 541-752-1204 Klamath, CA 95548 www.quantumspatial.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Deliverable Products ................................................................................................................................. 5 PROCESSING ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Sonar Integration....................................................................................................................................... 7 Integration Derived Products .................................................................................................................. 10 Integrated Topobathymetric DEMs ..................................................................................................... 10 RESULTS & DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................................... 11 Mapped Bathymetry and Integrated Coverage ...................................................................................... 11 Cover Photo: An aerial
    [Show full text]
  • The Klamath River
    Preliminary Economic Assessment of Dam Removal: The Klamath River Sarah A. Kruse, Ph.D. Astrid J. Scholz, Ph.D. Ecotrust January 31, 2006 721 NW Ninth Ave, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97209 www.ecotrust.org Preliminary Economic Assessment of Dam Removal: The Klamath River 1. INTRODUCTION The Klamath River flows over 250 miles from its headwaters in southwestern Oregon through northern California to the coast, where it drains into the Pacific Ocean. The Klamath is one of only three rivers to pass through the Cascades and is the second largest river in California. It is divided into two distinct sections, the Upper and the Lower. A significant amount of water is diverted from the Upper Klamath River for agricultural irrigation within the federal Klamath Irrigation Project, while much of the Lower Klamath runs through the Klamath National Forest. The river and its fish, particularly salmon, are considered sacred by the Native Tribes that live nearby, including the Yurok, Hupa, Karuk and Klamath Tribes. Historically, the river was considered prime habitat for a variety of species including: Chinook salmon, coho salmon, silver salmon, steelhead trout and Pacific lamprey. Once the third-largest river for salmon spawning on the West Coast, the Klamath River now produces only a fraction of its historic levels. Six dams, constructed between 1908 and 1962, truncate the river and prevent salmon, as well as other anadromous species, from moving upstream. The lowest dam, Iron Gate, sits at river mile 190 and is the current limit of upstream passage for
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2008 Fifth Annual Fall Basketweavers
    Fall 2008 Post Office Box 1016 (530) 493-1600 64236 Second Avenue (800) 505-2785 Happy Camp, CA 96039 3,520 Tribal Members (800-50Karuk) www.karuk.us Karuk Tribe’s Quarterly Newsmagazine 12th Annual Karuk Tribal Reunion See Pages 14-17 Fifth Annual Fall Basketweavers Gathering See Pages 10 & 11 2 CHAIRMAN Florrine Super and Arch Super and all volunteers and vendors, our fundraiser was a success. Everyone worked ARCH SUPER’S CORNER Super hard. We would like to thank very much, everyone Page involved. We look forward to a successful year in 2009. The Boosters / CASA Club supports and advocates for Ayukii koovura pa the youth of the Karuk Tribe. Our Boosters / CASA Club Karuk araaras (Hello all co-sponsored, with the Quartz Valley Indian Reservation a Karuk people and relatives). softball team, in the COS softball course over the summer. If xara xas tanupmah karu Our team took first place in the Co-ed division. nuchuupha pa araarahih. (I have not seen you in a long I traveled to Verona NY for the quarterly Tribal time and I have not talked Budget Advisory Committee (TBAC) meeting. The the language in a long time). Tribal Regions of the US discuss the affairs of the Federal Huut ni iin (What’s the mater BIA budget. Our Federal and State budgets have no with me). Chimi kiik itaptiheesh pa ararahih (Let’s increases, but have the opposite decreases in funding for learn the language) Yootva. Tribes throughout the US. The Karuk Tribe is in Region IV and we plan to submit a proposal to TBAC for carry over funding of the BIA budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Map of Upper Eocene to Holocene Volcanic and Related Rocks of the Cascade Range, Oregon
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Preliminary map of upper Eocene to Holocene volcanic and related rocks of the Cascade Range, Oregon by David R. Sherrod1 and James G. Smith1 Open-File Report 89-14 1989 This map is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. 'Menlo Park, Calif. PRELIMINARY MAP OF UPPER EOCENE TO HOLOCENE VOLCANIC AND RELATED ROCKS OF THE CASCADE RANGE, OREGON CONTENTS Pamphlet Introduction .................................................................. Onset of Cascade Range volcanism ................................................................................................................3 Map units ........................................................................................................................................................6 Geologic history....................................................................................................^^ & . Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................15 Combined text and map references............................................................................................................... 15 Map plate Geologic map Correlation chart Description of map units (references are cited in pamphlet; see Combined text and map
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrences of the Lost River Sucker, Deltistes Luxatus (Cope), and Shortnose Sucker, Chasmistes Brevirostris Cope, in Northern California'
    • REPRINT FROM Calif. Fish and Game, 51 (2 ) : 68-73. 1965. OCCURRENCES OF THE LOST RIVER SUCKER, DELTISTES LUXATUS (COPE), AND SHORTNOSE SUCKER, CHASMISTES BREVIROSTRIS COPE, IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA' MILLARD COOTS Inland Fisheries, Region 1 California Department of Fish and Game The Lost River sucker and the shortnose sucker are added to the fresh- water fish fauna of California. Their distribution, a brief discussion of habits, and meristic data are included. Recent captures of the Lost River sucker and the shortnose sucker represent additions to the freshwater fish fauna of California (Shapo- valov, Dill, and Cordone, 1959). The ranges of these suckers (family Catostomidae) previously were given as the Klamath Lakes drainage in Oregon (Schultz, 1936; Eddy, 1957). Gilbert (1898) stated that Del- tistes apparently were resident during most of the year in the deeper waters of Upper Klamath Lake and Tule Lakes (Figure 1). On May 15, 1955, Ned Dollahite, California Department of Fish and Game, collected a mature shortnose sucker from Boles Creek, Modoc County, near Steele Swamp Ranch. I saw additional specimens in the same vicinity on May 10, 1960, which were swimming upstream in an apparent spawning migration. Boles Creek is an intermittent tribu- tary of Willow Creek, the principal stream entering Clear Lake Reser- voir. Lost River originates from Clear Lake Reservoir, flows northward into Oregon, eventually re-enters California, and discharges into Tule Lake, its natural terminus. Lost River is now connected to the Klamath River by the Lost River Diversion Canal. Specimens of the shortnose and Lost River suckers were first collected from Copco Lake, Siskiyou County, on November 20, 1956.
    [Show full text]