DOCSLIB.ORG

Defending Perceptual Objectivism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Defending Perceptual Objectivism Defending Perceptual Objectivism: A Naturalistic Realist Analysis of Aesthetic Properties A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Philosophy of the College of Arts and Sciences by Iris P. Spoor B.A. Thomas More College November, 2017 Committee Chair: Jenefer Robinson, Ph.D. Abstract This dissertation has several key components. First, I argue that the dispositional model of aesthetic properties is the most viable form of aesthetic realism. I explain that it is able to effectively balance the subjective and objective characteristics of aesthetic properties. I go on to argue that the most naturalistically viable form of dispositionalism is perceptual objectivism. Next, I synthesize the work of Frank Sibley and Jerrold Levinson and develop a fuller account of perceptual objectivism. In chapter 2, I argue that perceptual objectivism has two crucial features: (1) a dispositional realist model of aesthetic properties (which I call the perceptual model) and (2) the descriptive analysis of aesthetic properties. The descriptive analysis of aesthetic properties is the most controversial—and the most important—part of perceptual objectivism. Because of this, the bulk of the dissertation is devoted to defending the descriptive account from a philosophical and an empirical perspective. It is fairly unusual to treat aesthetic properties as fundamentally descriptive; indeed, it is why perceptual objectivism might be considered a revisionist theory of aesthetic properties. A key component of this view is something I call the separability thesis. The thesis contends that evaluative reactions to aesthetic properties can be separated from the objective, perceptual content of an aesthetic experience thereby leaving us with the non-evaluative core of the aesthetic property. As I outline in chapter 5, garishness is a good case study. The descriptive content creates the boundary of the concept. Many would agree that garishness is an unpleasant feature of an object. A garish carpet, for example, might cause one to experience genuine aesthetic displeasure. This displeasure, however, does not constitute the property. A ‘garish’ object is characterized by bright, clashing colors. The fact that we can consistently apply and understand ‘garish’ suggests that there is some kind of common perceptual content associated with an experience of the property. This common perceptual content also explains how an artist can intentionally manipulate a medium to create certain aesthetic effects. Two aspects of the view loom large in criticism: 1) the separability thesis (described above) and 2) the empirical viability of higher-order aesthetic perception. In chapter 3, I respond to several potent challenges to the separability thesis. In chapter 4, I address 2) by taking an extensive look at empirical aesthetics. I analyze one case in particular, amusia, which offers possible empirical support for the perceptual objectivist analysis of aesthetic experience. Finally, in chapter 5 I draw on the philosophy of perception to defend the perceptual model of aesthetic experience. A fully developed account of perceptual objectivism offers philosophers a naturalistically viable form of aesthetic realism and opens up new possibilities for research in meta-aesthetics. ii iii Acknowledgements This dissertation would not have been possible without the consistent support and guidance of my committee chair, Jenefer Robinson. Over the years this has been in development, she has offered support and constructive criticism that shaped my project into what it is today. I am also indebted to my other committee members, Lawrence Jost and Vanessa Carbonell, who have offered extensive comments and suggestions that have greatly improved the quality of my work. They have put in a great deal of effort to make it possible for me to complete this year. I greatly appreciate their efforts. I’d also like to thank my undergraduate advisor, Jerome Langguth. His teaching, and guidance, inspired me to pursue philosophy at the graduate level. I must also thank the UC Philosophy Department. My years there were happy ones that greatly improved my abilities as a writer and as a philosopher. I’d like to thank all of the faculty and graduate students for their support over the years, but I’d particularly like to recognize Doug Keaton, Vanessa Bentley, Daniel Hartner, and Tom Polger for their helpful comments on this dissertation. Steven Cahn also deserves my thanks for generously providing insights on the subject of amusia. Last, but not least, I want to thank Director of Graduate Studies, Angela Potochnik, for her important assistance. My colleagues at Mount St. Joseph University also deserve my thanks. They have offered support and given me every opportunity to succeed as a professor and finish this dissertation at the same time. Without their understanding, this simply would not have been possible. Mike Sontag, Ron White, and Buffy Barkley have been especially helpful in making this dissertation possible. I am most grateful, though, to my family. They have been unfailingly supportive of my graduate work and my personal development. Were it not for the intellectual environment fostered at home—and the endless debates--I would likely never have pursued philosophy. iv Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... v Chapter 1: An Introduction to Aesthetic Realism ..................................................................... 1 1.1 Aesthetic Realism and Aesthetic Properties.......................................................................... 2 1.1a Reasons to be a Realist .................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Powerful Challenges for Aesthetic Realism........................................................................ 12 1.2a The Argument from Relativity ...................................................................................... 12 1.2b The Naturalistic Objection ............................................................................................. 15 1.3 Dispositional Realism in Ethics and Aesthetics .................................................................. 19 1.4 Dispositional realism and Perceptual Objectivism ............................................................. 27 Chapter 2: Defining Perceptual Objectivism ........................................................................... 33 2.1 Aesthetic Properties: Sibley ................................................................................................ 33 2.2 Aesthetic Properties: Levinson............................................................................................ 39 2.3 The descriptive account of aesthetic properties .................................................................. 50 2.4 Supervenience ..................................................................................................................... 54 2.5 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 67 Chapter 3: Defending the Non-Evaluative Analysis of Aesthetic Properties ........................ 69 3.1 Bender and Irresolvable Perceptual Disputes...................................................................... 70 3.1a Bender’s Empirical Critique .......................................................................................... 82 3.2 Rafael De Clercq’s Variable Polarity Argument................................................................. 85 3.3 Shaping and the Evaluative Standpoint ............................................................................... 89 3.4 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 98 Chapter 4: Empirical Aesthetics and the Descriptive Account .............................................. 99 4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 100 4.1a Empirical Adequacy and The Principle of Minimal Psychological Realism .............. 101 4.1b Why Neuroaesthetics? ................................................................................................. 102 4.2 Aesthetic Processing: A Neuroaesthetic Perspective ........................................................ 103 v 4.2a Is There An Aesthetic Center of the Brain? ................................................................ 104 4.3 Zeki and the Foundations of the OFC Theory .................................................................. 107 4.3a Descriptive vs. Aesthetic Judgments: An Empirical Perspective ................................ 114 4.4 Empirical Failings of the OFC View................................................................................. 117 4.4a Abnormal Cases: OFC Damage with Spared Aesthetic Experience ........................... 119 4.5 Towards New Insights: Anjan Chatterjee’s framework ...................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1The Strengths and Limits of Philosophical Anarchism
    THE STRENGTHS AND LIMITS OF 1 PHILOSOPHICAL ANARCHISM THE BASIC DEFINITION of state legitimacy as the exclusive right to make, apply, and enforce laws is common, clearly visible in Max Weber and contemporary political philosophy and found less explicitly in the classical contract thinkers.1 A. John Simmons, drawing on Locke, writes that “A state’s (or government’s) legitimacy is the complex moral right it possesses to be the exclusive imposer of binding duties on its sub- jects, to have its subjects comply with these duties, and to use coercion to enforce the duties” (Simmons 2001, 130). Similar definitions—whether vis-à-vis legitimacy or authority—with slight alterations of terms and in conjunction with a series of other ideas and conditions (for example, “authoritativeness,” background criteria, the difference between force and violence) can be found in Robert Paul Wolff (1998, 4), Joseph Raz (2009), Richard Flathman (1980), Leslie Green (1988), David Copp (1999), Hannah Pitkin (1965, 1966), and others. The point is that the justification of state legitimacy and the (corresponding) obligation to obey involve, more often than not, making, applying, and enforcing laws: political power. Often left out of these discussions—with important exceptions—are the real practices of legitimate statehood, and perhaps for good reason. What philosophers who explore the question of legitimacy and authority are most often interested in—for a variety of reasons—is the relation of the individ- ual to the state, that is, whether and to what extent a citizen (or sometimes a noncitizen) has an obligation to obey the state. As Raz notes, part of the explanation for this is that contemporary philosophical interest in questions of political obligation emerged in response to political events in the 1960s (Raz 1981, 105).
    [Show full text]
  • Nicholas Silins
    NICHOLAS SILINS Cornell University Sage School of Philosophy 218 Goldwin Smith Hall Ithaca, 18543, USA [email protected] AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Epistemology, Philosophy of Mind AREAS OF COMPETENCE Metaphysics, Aesthetics, Classical Asian Philosophy EDUCATION Oxford University, D.Phil in Philosophy, 2004 Dissertation: Reasons and Armchair Knowledge Supervisor: Timothy Williamson Oxford University, B.Phil in Philosophy, 2001 Thesis: Content and Self-Knowledge Supervisor: Timothy Williamson Princeton University, B.A. in Comparative Literature, magna cum laude, 1999 APPOINTMENTS Field Member of Cognitive Science, Cornell University, 2018-present Associate Professor of Philosophy, Cornell University, 2012-present Associate Professor of Philosophy, Yale-NUS College, 2013-2016 Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Cornell University, 2006-2012 Research Fellow, Australian National University, RSSS, Centre for Consciousness, Jan-July 2007, Jan-July 2009 Bersoff Fellow, New York University, 2004-2006 1 of 6 PUBLICATIONS 2019 “Attention and Perceptual Justification”, with Susanna Siegel, for A. Pautz and D. Stoljar (eds.) Themes From Ned Block (MIT) 2018 "The Evil Demon Inside", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Early View Online “The Structure of Episodic Memory: Ganeri’s ‘Mental time travel and attention’”, with Susanna Siegel, Australasian Philosophical Review 4: 374-394 2016 “Cognitive Penetration and the Epistemology of Perception”, Blackwell Compass 11: 24-42 2015 “Perceptual Experience and Perceptual Justification”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy “The Epistemology of Perception”, with Susanna Siegel, in (ed.) M. Matthen, The Oxford Handbook of Perception (OUP) 2014 “The Agony of Defeat?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88: 505-532. “Experience Does Justify Belief”, in R. Neta (ed.) Current Controversies in Epistemology (Routledge) “Consciousness, Attention, and Justification”, with Susanna Siegel, in D.
    [Show full text]
  • Phil. 270/570: Epistemology Fall 2021 Prof. Keith Derose Tu, Th 9:00-10:15Am
    Phil. 270/570: Epistemology Fall 2021 Prof. Keith DeRose Tu, Th 9:00-10:15am; room TBA KDR office hour: Th (on which classes meet) 10:30-11:30 CT Hall, room 410 The course web page will be at: http://campuspress.yale.edu/keithderose/epistemology-f21/ Reading for the First Meeting: If possible, read items 1-2 from the list of readings (on p. 4 of this syllabus). They are both quite short. Please note: The final exam for this class will be at the last exam period on Yale’s schedule (Wed., Dec. 22, 2:00-5:00 pm), and I won’t be able to schedule an alternative early exam, so please verify that that time will fit your travel and other plans before taking this course. Phil. 270 Course Description. This is the basic course in epistemology, so the plan is to discuss at least many of the main topics and issues important to epistemology. However, we won’t be having assigned readings about all of these topics. Rather, we will read papers and portions of books that focus on just a five of them (our “focus topics”), but will use these as jumping off points for discussing other issues. I have not chosen the focus topics described briefly below because they are the five most important topics to epistemology today. Rather, given how they fit together with one another and how they naturally give rise to other important issues, at least as I approach them, they seem to be five topics around which we can build a course in which you encounter interesting philosophical work and also learn about the field of epistemology, encountering, even if not focusing upon, many important topics.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Aesthetics and Gustav Klimt: in Pursuit of a New Voice Svitlana Shiells
    Strand 2. Art Nouveau and Politics in the Dawn of Globalisation Japanese Aesthetics and Gustav Klimt: In Pursuit of a New Voice Svitlana Shiells Abstract At the end of the nineteenth century, Japonisme—an artistic lingua franca—became one of the most organic, overarching components of Gustav Klimt’s new art. This paper draws parallels between Gustav Klimt’s Portrait of Sonja Knips and It ō Jakuch ū’s print Golden Pheasant and Bamboo in Snow . The discovery of an unexpectedly close dialogue between Klimt and Jakuch ū and the striking similarity of the formal language of the two works supports the paper’s thesis that It ō Jakuch ū’s print is the primary source of influence behind the conception and execution of the portrait and, by extension, that Klimt’s engagement with Japanese stimuli is one of the main engines behind his creative pursuit, starting at the end of the 1890s. This discovery challenges preconceived notions and existing concepts and illustrates the impossibility of understanding Klimt’s heritage comprehensively and adequately without examining the role of Japonisme in it. Keywords: Gustav Klimt, Japonisme, It ō Jakuch ū, the Vienna Secession, ukiyo-e prints. 1 In the wake of the World Fair of 1873 in Vienna, a strong wave of Japonisme permanently re- shaped the capital of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. According to Hermann Bahr, the Viennese encountered the presence of “Japonisme in all the arts,” which were “impossible to understand without bearing in mind the influence of Japanese art.” 1 Japonisme indeed became a Zeitgeist in fin de siècle Vienna and, in the visual arts, Gustav Klimt was its main advocate.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophers' Brief
    CAPITAL CASE No. 18-6135 In the Supreme Court of the United States ________________ JAMES K. KAHLER, Petitioner, v. STATE OF KANSAS, Respondent. ________________ On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kansas ________________ Brief of Philosophy Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner ________________ EUGENE R. FIDELL (Counsel of Record) Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP 1129 20th St., N.W., 4th Fl. Washington, DC 20036 (202) 256-8675 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae QUESTION PRESENTED Do the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments per- mit a State to abolish the insanity defense? i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Interest of the Amici ................................................. 1 Summary of Argument ............................................. 1 Argument .................................................................. 2 I. THE MENTAL STATE ELEMENTS OF CRIMES ARE INSUFFICIENT FOR RESPONSIBILITY .............................. 2 II. SANITY IS NECESSARY FOR RESPONS- IBILITY AND SO ESSENTIAL TO BOTH THE DETERRENT AND RETRIBUTIVE AIMS OF CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT ........ 6 III.PRINCIPLES OF TOLERATION DO NOT SUPPORT DEFERENCE TO STATES THAT CHOOSE TO PUNISH THE MENTALLY ILL ......................................... 12 Conclusion ............................................................... 14 Appendix (List of Amici Curiae) ............................. 1a iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases: Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1954) .................................................... 14 Ford v. Wainwright,
    [Show full text]
  • Jay: an Intimate Martyr of Objectivism Jordan Miller
    First Class: A Journal of First-Year Composition Volume 2017 Article 5 Spring 2017 Jay: An Intimate Martyr of Objectivism Jordan Miller Follow this and additional works at: https://ddc.duq.edu/first-class Recommended Citation Miller, J. (2017). Jay: An Intimate Martyr of Objectivism. First Class: A Journal of First-Year Composition, 2017 (1). Retrieved from https://ddc.duq.edu/first-class/vol2017/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in First Class: A Journal of First-Year Composition by an authorized editor of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Honors Program Second Prize Essay JAY: AN INTIMATE MARTYR OF OBJECTIVISM By Jordan Miller Instructor: Dr. Matthew Ussia “At the dawn of our lives, we seek a noble vision of man’s nature and of life’s potential” (“Introduction”). According to Ayn Rand, Russian-American novelist and philosopher, Objectivism is that vision. This credo rests in the foundation that reality exists and one must discover its nature with an audacious approach of self-serving ambition. Although it has received a fair amount of following, praise, and success, Rand’s philosophy has also sourced the demise of many individuals through broken promises and mental pandemonium. The life and mental state of Jay, a broken man from the novel Intimacy by Hanif Kureishi, serves to thoroughly exemplify the philosophy’s imperfections and the reasoning behind one’s downfall on the path of Objectivism. Throughout the novel, his character development, or lack thereof, constitutes as the paradigm for an Objectivist breakdown.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae (Short) Alex Byrne Professor of Philosophy and Head, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT ______
    July 2020 Curriculum Vitae (short) Alex Byrne Professor of Philosophy and Head, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT ___________________________________________________________________ Contact Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy 32-D808, Cambridge MA 02139-4307, USA +1 617.258.6106 (ph); +1 617.253.5017 (fax) [email protected]; web.mit.edu/abyrne/www/; orcid: 0000-0003-3652-1492 Employment 2006- Professor of Philosophy, MIT 2002-2006 Associate Professor of Philosophy, MIT (tenured) 1999-2002 Associate Professor of Philosophy, MIT (untenured) 1995-1999 Assistant Professor of Philosophy, MIT 1994-1995 Instructor in Philosophy, MIT 1993-1994 Mellon Postdoctoral Instructor in Philosophy, Caltech Education 1994 Ph.D., Princeton University 1989 M.A., King’s College London 1988 B.A., Birkbeck College London Research Areas Primary: philosophy of mind; metaphysics and epistemology Secondary: philosophy of language; twentieth century analytic philosophy; philosophy of sex and gender; philosophical logic; ethics Publications Papers and Commentaries Forthcoming “Comment on Yli-Vakkuri and Hawthorne,” Narrow Content, Philosophical Studies. Forthcoming “Concepts, Belief, and Perception,” Concepts in Thought, Action, and Emotion: New Essays, ed. Christoph Demmerling and Dirk Schröder, Routledge. Forthcoming “Objectivist Reductionism” (with David Hilbert), in Fiona Macpherson & Derek Brown (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Colour, 2 Routledge. Forthcoming “The Science of Color and Color Vision” (with David Hilbert), in Fiona Macpherson & Derek Brown (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Colour, Routledge. 2020 “Are Women Adult Human Females?,” Philosophical Studies. 2019 “Schellenberg’s Capacitism,” Analysis 79: 713-9. 2019 “Perception and Ordinary Objects,” The Nature of Ordinary Objects, ed. J. Cumpa and B. Brewer, Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Visual Art with the Brain in Mind
    1 Teaching Visual Art with the Brain in Mind A thesis presented by Karen G. Pearson to the Graduate School of Education In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education In the field of Education College of Professional Studies Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts August 20, 2019 2 ABSTRACT Critical periods of perceptual development occur during the elementary and middle school years. Vision plays a major role in this development. The use of child development knowledge of Bruner, Skinner, Piaget and Inhelder coupled with the artistic thinking theories of Goldschmidt, Marshall, and Williams through and the lens of James J. Gibson and his ex-wife Eleanor J. framed the study. Sixteen 8-10-year-olds over eight one-hour weekly meetings focused on how they see and learn how to draw. The study demonstrated that the perception of the participants followed the development of the visual pathway as described in empirical neural studies. Salient features presented themselves first and then, over time, details such as space, texture, and finally depth can be learned over many years of development. The eye muscles need to build stamina through guided lessons that provide practice as well as a finished product. It was more important to focus on the variety of qualities of line, shape, and space and strategy building through solution finding and goal setting. Perceptual development indicators of how 8-10-year-old elementary students see and understand images will be heard from their voices. The results indicated that practice exercises helped participants build stamina that directly related to their ability to persist in drawing.
    [Show full text]
  • Winds and Tigers: Metaphor Choice in China's Anti-Corruption Discourse
    Jing-Schmidt and Peng Lingua Sinica (2017) 3:2 DOI 10.1186/s40655-016-0017-9 RESEARCH Open Access Winds and tigers: metaphor choice in China’s anti-corruption discourse Zhuo Jing-Schmidt* and Xinjia Peng * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract University of Oregon, Eugene ’ 97403, OR, USA This article examines metaphor choice in China s official anti-corruption discourse. Drawing on corpus data, we analyze the metaphors used by the Chinese Communist Party and its flagship newspaper, the People’s Daily, to frame the anti-corruption campaign and influence public perception. It is found that both embodied experience and cultural models are recruited as the metaphoric vehicles or source domains for the strategic profiling of different aspects of corruption and anti- corruption actions as the target domain. Additionally, metaphor choice is systematically different in the Chinese and the English versions of the party newspaper, reflecting that metaphor use is sensitive to sociocultural context, especially to the knowledge base within an epistemic community. Keywords: China, Anti-corruption campaign, Metaphor choice, Political discourse 1 Background During the transition from a planned economy to a market economy in the last three decades, China has experienced what many scholars call an “economic miracle.” At the same time, Chinese society is faced with “an extraordinary and serious epidemic of cor- ruption” (Meng 2014: 33). There seems to be a consensus among China scholars that the reforms that brought about liberalization and commercialization, and fueled the economic boom, also drove the surge of corruption by providing fertile soil for its rampant growth (Gong 2002, 2006; Guo 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Paths from the Philosophy of Art to Everyday Aesthetics
    Paths from the Philosophy of Art to Everyday Aesthetics Edited by Oiva Kuisma, Sanna Lehtinen and Harri Mäcklin Paths from the Philosophy of Art to Everyday Aesthetics © 2019 Authors Cover and graphic design Kimmo Nurminen ISBN 978-952-94-1878-7 PATHS FROM THE PHILOSOPHY OF ART TO EVERYDAY AESTHETICS Eds. Oiva Kuisma, Sanna Lehtinen and Harri Mäcklin Published in Helsinki, Finland by the Finnish Society for Aesthetics, 2019 6 Contents 9 Oiva Kuisma, Sanna Lehtinen and Harri Mäcklin Introduction: From Baumgarten to Contemporary Aesthetics 19 Morten Kyndrup Were We Ever Modern? Art, Aesthetics, and the Everyday: Distinctions and Interdependences 41 Lars-Olof Åhlberg Everyday and Otherworldly Objects: Dantoesque Transfiguration 63 Markus Lammenranta How Art Teaches: A Lesson from Goodman 78 María José Alcaraz León Aesthetic Intimacy 101 Knut Ove Eliassen Quality Issues 112 Martta Heikkilä Work and Play – The Built Environments in Terry Gilliam’s Brazil 132 Kalle Puolakka Does Valery Gergiev Have an Everyday? 148 Francisca Pérez-Carreño The Aesthetic Value of the Unnoticed 167 Mateusz Salwa Everyday Green Aesthetics 180 Ossi Naukkarinen Feeling (With) Machines 201 Richard Shusterman Pleasure, Pain, and the Somaesthetics of Illness: A Question for Everyday Aesthetics 215 Epiloque: Jos de Mul These Boots Are Made for Talkin’. Some Reflections on Finnish Mobile Immobility 224 Index of Names 229 List of Contributors 7 OIVA KUISMA, SANNA LEHTINEN & HARRI MÄCKLIN INTRODUCTION: FROM BAUMGARTEN TO CONTEMPORARY AESTHETICS ontemporary philosopher-aestheticians
    [Show full text]
  • Objectivism/Subjectivism in Scientific Articles of Different Areas: the Heterogeneity of Academic Writing
    OBJETIVISMO/SUBJETIVISMO EM ARTIGOS CIENTÍFICOS DAS DIFERENTES ÁREAS: A HETEROGENEIDADE DA ESCRITA ACADÊMICA Ângela Francine FUZA* ▪ RESUMO: A existência do discurso que postula a homogeneização da escrita acadêmico- científica no processo de constituição do texto é a problemática que desencadeou esta pesquisa. Nesse sentido, o objetivo deste estudo é analisar artigos científicos brasileiros de periódicos A1 das diferentes áreas do conhecimento a partir dos elementos que constituem os gêneros, forma composicional, estilo e temática, delimitando aspectos que tendem ao objetivismo e ao subjetivismo nos textos. O trabalho se pauta nos pressupostos dialógicos do Círculo de Bakhtin, no tocante aos gêneros, ao objetivismo e subjetivismo, e nas pesquisas desenvolvidas segundo os princípios dos Novos Estudos do Letramento. Os resultados apontam que: a) todo enunciado é constituído de elementos subjetivos e objetivos; b) os aspectos que evidenciam objetividade e subjetividade marcam-se predominantemente na forma composicional (e arquitetônica) e no estilo dos textos, em diálogo com a temática; c) os artigos das diferentes áreas se assemelham, ao tratar de elementos que tendem à objetividade, como forma composicional e recursos linguísticos; d) os artigos diferem quando apresentam aspectos que, embora estejam na materialidade verbal, encontram significação no contexto extraverbal, perpassando a subjetividade, como escolha temática; variação no número de autores no texto etc.; e) a existência de nuances de objetividade e de subjetividade permite caracterizar a escrita nas áreas de forma heterogênea. ▪ PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Objetivismo. Subjetivismo. Escrita acadêmica. Artigo científico. Introdução A escrita acadêmico-científica tem sido um tema amplamente discutido no meio acadêmico por pesquisadores do campo dos estudos da linguagem em seus vários âmbitos e perspectivas metodológicas.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Design Aesthetics and Visual Culture
    Semester: Spring 2020 Japanese Design Aesthetics and Visual Culture Section 1 Instructor/Title Dr. Seonga Kim-Lee / Assistant Professor Office/Building Room 712, Main Building (Nakamiya Campus) 【Course Outline / Description】 This course aims at understanding Japanese aesthetics, culture, and society through the twentieth-century design. Students will examine broad range of design examples in terms of reflective of the social, political, and economic culture of the time. The course will begin by exploring Japanese aesthetics and prewar design and continues by discussing contemporary design with regard to the emergence of design, made in Japan, pop culture, and disaster and design. Students need to be familiarized with Japanese terms related to aesthetics and culture at the beginning of this course in order to understand how religion and philosophy are reflected in Japanese art and design. Through lectures, discussions, presentations, and field trips, students will understand how traditional Japanese aesthetics reflected on contemporary design and how individual Japanese designers uniquely delivered traditional aesthetics to international style. Section 2 【Course Objectives/Goals/Learning Outcomes】 At the end of this course students will be able to: - Take design as a key tool for understanding Japanese aesthetics, culture, and history. - Perceive a brief history of Japanese design in the twentieth century and demonstrate specific issues affected Japanese design. - Clarify the difference between Japanese and western aesthetics in design. - Demonstrate how traditional Japanese culture reflected in the contemporary design. Section 3 【Class Schedule/Class Environment, Literature and Materials】 Unit 1: Aesthetics and Culture Lecture 1: DNA of Japanese Design 日本貿易振興機構, 「日本デザインの遺伝子展」の記録 DNA of Japanese Design, (日本貿易振興 機構 2006), 18, 20.
    [Show full text]