Teaching Visual Art with the Brain in Mind
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 Teaching Visual Art with the Brain in Mind A thesis presented by Karen G. Pearson to the Graduate School of Education In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education In the field of Education College of Professional Studies Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts August 20, 2019 2 ABSTRACT Critical periods of perceptual development occur during the elementary and middle school years. Vision plays a major role in this development. The use of child development knowledge of Bruner, Skinner, Piaget and Inhelder coupled with the artistic thinking theories of Goldschmidt, Marshall, and Williams through and the lens of James J. Gibson and his ex-wife Eleanor J. framed the study. Sixteen 8-10-year-olds over eight one-hour weekly meetings focused on how they see and learn how to draw. The study demonstrated that the perception of the participants followed the development of the visual pathway as described in empirical neural studies. Salient features presented themselves first and then, over time, details such as space, texture, and finally depth can be learned over many years of development. The eye muscles need to build stamina through guided lessons that provide practice as well as a finished product. It was more important to focus on the variety of qualities of line, shape, and space and strategy building through solution finding and goal setting. Perceptual development indicators of how 8-10-year-old elementary students see and understand images will be heard from their voices. The results indicated that practice exercises helped participants build stamina that directly related to their ability to persist in drawing. The findings have shown that the development of the 8-10-year- olds’ visual pathway was found at the global lower level visual field of V1 and V2 where the processes of orientation of direction sensitive retinal cells are still processing salient features. Key Words Affordance, ambiguous, art, art education, art history, binocular, chiaroscuro, disambiguate, disparity, drawing, eye movement, haptic, image, learning, neuroeducation, perception, scaffold, schema, seeing, senses, sketching, strategies, teaching, uncertainty, vergence, vision, visual art, visual brain, visual thinking. 3 Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Introduction to the Study and Theoretical Framework ..............................................5 Background and context ......................................................................................................6 Research Problem and Research Questions .......................................................................16 Definition of Key Terms ....................................................................................................24 Applying Theory to Study .................................................................................................50 Chapter Two: Literature Review ...................................................................................................53 Binocular Development and Ambiguities ..........................................................................57 The Science of Art .............................................................................................................72 Drawing Pedagogy in the United States ............................................................................82 Chapter Summary ..............................................................................................................95 Chapter Three: Research Design and Methodology ......................................................................98 Qualitative Research Approach .......................................................................................104 Participants .......................................................................................................................110 Procedures ........................................................................................................................110 Data Analysis ...................................................................................................................114 Ethical Considerations .....................................................................................................118 Trustworthiness ................................................................................................................119 Bias ..................................................................................................................................120 Limitations .......................................................................................................................120 Chapter Four: Findings & Analysis .............................................................................................120 Theme 1 ...........................................................................................................................125 4 Theme 2 ...........................................................................................................................136 Theme 3 ...........................................................................................................................145 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................154 Chapter Five: Discussion and Implications for Practice ..............................................................157 References ....................................................................................................................................179 Appendix A: Interview Protocol Template ..................................................................................203 Appendix B: Participant Images ..................................................................................................204 5 Chapter One Standardized education is extinguishing visual arts in public school systems (Rabkin & Hedberg, 2011, p. 21; Robinson, 2006). Large-scale assessments of eighth grade students’ ability to respond and create an original work of art have shown no improvement, in art, when comparing scores between 1997 and 2016 (U.S. Government NAEP, 2017; Sabol, 2013, pp. 37- 38; Gallagher, Campbell, Esch, Malin, Mayes, & Woodworth, 2008; Stites, & Malin, 2008, pp. vii-viii; White & Vanneman, 1997, pp. 80-117; Persky, H. R., Sandene, B. A., & Askew, J. M. 1999, pp. 83-117). However, the variety of media and processes available to be assessed resulted in inconsistency, because standard language and repertoire has not yet been established (Sickler- Voigt, 2018, n.p.; Tucker, 2003, pp. 3-20). According to an article by Seymour Simmons drawing instruction in school has declined (Simmons, 2019, p. 14). The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) conducted a 2008 survey that showed a deficit of art education in adults, who were educated during the time of deep budget cuts during the 1970s, have passed on their lack of interest and exposure of art to their children, thus, perpetuating their dis-interest in museums resulting in the development of a generation of people who lack exposure, understanding, and interest in the arts (Silber, & Triplett, 2015, p. 17). The erosion of the art curriculum is reinforced in schools whose focus is on test-prep subjects replacing the arts with remedial programs geared to pump up large-scale assessment test scores (Hardiman, 2016, pp. 1914-1915). This erosion is particularly evident in the severe narrowing of the curriculum in low-income schools creating a divide between the wealthy schools that are able to afford “licensed teachers and expensive tools and supplies” (Hardiman, 2016, p. 1916) while the low-income schools use funding for remedial classes to boost test scores to meet the annual yearly progress (AYP) requirements. Policymakers continue to 6 overlook the importance of visual art education and its effects on over-all learning as access to art education erodes (Sabol, 2013, pp. 41-42). Instead policy continues to emphasize information pertaining to test-prep subjects as is seen in many school mission statements creating a built-in tension that narrows the arts creating a small niche labeled “talented” or “gifted” that stigmatizes art giving the sense that art is not meant for all students (Gaztambide-Fernandez, Nicholls, & Arriz-Matute, 2016, p. 33). “No doubt standards will come and go as time moves forward, but they need to be underpinned by a clear vision of art education as a discipline of mind and of teachers as promoting learning that is both personally and socially meaningful rather than narrowed to predetermined lists of skills and routines amenable to single-criteria assessment” (Judith M. Burton, 2019, p. 1649). Assessment in visual art has not yet included specific scaffold of language, process, and criteria for the developing child to be able to reach the attainment of national assessment mentally or physically. Background and Context Throughout time visual art has demonstrated its flexibility. It might even be considered the first written language of humans as a means of communication and has developed over 70,000 years. Drawings, for example, have been considered a universal language that has the ability to transcend language and culture in communication (Sharon A. Brusic & Joseph G. Steinmacher, 2015, p. 10). Research has shown that geoglyphs,