DOCSLIB.ORG

Submission to Infrastructure Victoria: Preparing Advice on Options to Secure Victoria’S Future Port Capacity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Submission to Infrastructure Victoria: Preparing Advice on Options to Secure Victoria’S Future Port Capacity Preserve Western Port Action Group Submission. January 2017 PRESERVE WESTERN PORT ACTION GROUP SUBMISSION TO INFRASTRUCTURE VICTORIA: PREPARING ADVICE ON OPTIONS TO SECURE VICTORIA’S FUTURE PORT CAPACITY. 1 Preserve Western Port Action Group Submission. January 2017 Contents: Page No. Executive Summary 3 Infrastructure Victoria: Terms of Reference. 3 Environmental Issues. 4 Recent Environmental Reports Tidal flows, dredging and erosion Western Port Flora Seagrass, Mangroves and Salt Marsh Carbon Sinks in Western Port Putting a value on the Western Port Environment Economic Issues and Impacts . 10 The threat to the economy – Why take such a risk? Increased coastal erosion and inundation following dredging of Western Port. Increased visual and noise pollution – Visitor impact Impact on recreational boating, fishing and the marine related economy Impact on Victorian agriculture and aquifers Oil spills Social Issues . 17 Bass Coast Shire Council – Guiding Principals Attachments. 18 A. List of Abbreviations. B. Bass Coast Shire Council roundtable with key stakeholders regarding the future of Port of Hastings. 28th April 2016. Including Guiding Principles adopted by Bass Coast Shire Council. C. List of Reports, Documents presented to Infrastructure Victoria that supplement this submission. 2 Preserve Western Port Action Group Submission. January 2017 Preserve Western Port Submission to Infrastructure Victoria- Preparing advice on options to secure Victoria’s future port capacity Executive Summary The Preserve Western Port Action Group is a subcommittee of the Phillip Island Conservation Society. We have carefully examined the issue of constructing a container port in Western Port over the last three years. With our volunteer members we have undertaken research on issues and engaged with key stakeholders in understanding the key impacts on the region’s economy, environment and communities. We firmly believe that constructing a container port in Western Port will have significant adverse impacts on the Western Port communities. The impact on the Phillip Island economy and environment could be devastating. The annual movement of 6,000 large container ships through the existing penguin and marine feeding grounds, combined with loss of amenity and recreational boating access for the coastal communities and the vastly increased coastal erosion will put at significant risk the visitors to the region. These visitors currently generate $339 million in visitor expenditure equating to 3,100 direct and full-time equivalent jobs. (Phillip Island and San Remo Visitor Economy Strategy 2035. p3.) Our submission identifies key risks and impacts associated with the dredging and construction impacts of constructing a container port in Western Port. We believe these adverse impacts on the region will vastly outweigh any purported benefits that may arise from operating a container port in Western Port. We have recently provided your representatives with a number of reports and research that form part of our representations to you. (See Attachment C) Infrastructure Victoria: Terms of Reference The Preserve Western Port Action group have focussed on where a second container port would be located and the costs and impacts of developing a container port in Western Port. Specifically we provide comments to address Terms of Reference 2c and 2d with some emphasis on 2b. We believe many of the issues that are linked as environment issues can and do have economic impacts. Nevertheless, we have structured our comments in this report on: 1/. Environmental issues, especially in relation to International treaty obligations, (e.g. Ramsar) and detailed researched State-based studies such as the Western Port Local Coastal Hazard Assessment (WPLCHA) and the Central Region Coastal Plan.(CRCP) 3 Preserve Western Port Action Group Submission. January 2017 2/. Economic issues, especially those relating to tourism, recreational fishing and agriculture. 3/. Social Impact. In essence this is an amalgamation of the first two, but with an emphasis on what a container port at Hastings would means for the people who live, work and play on and around Western Port in its entirety. 1. Environmental Issues We firmly believe that adverse environmental impacts from the construction of a container port in Western Port will have a direct adverse economic impact due to the importance of tourism to the region’s economy. Further, the potential damage to the unique ecosystem of Western Port itself makes a compelling case against the construction of a container port particularly as Western Port is listed on the National Estate and contains three Marine National Parks to support its biodiversity. Australia is a signatory to a number of International agreements that oblige us to protect the area. In the 1970s, the Victorian government commissioned the Westernport Bay Environmental study 1973–1974 directed by Professor Maurice Shapiro and assisted by a team of 200 researchers. The study presented a comprehensive basic understanding of the bay’s major features, establishing the complexity and the high ecological values of the ecosystem. It modelled the hydrodynamics of the tidal flows and other circulation patterns showing how it would distribute pollutants rapidly to all parts of the bay. The Shapiro Report found: Industrial development can have far-reaching environmental effects, and also necessitates urban and port growth which, in turn, affects the environment. Areas of particular significance have been recognised at Westernport and, from a nature conservation point of view, options for industrial development may have to be limited so that these are not adversely affected. Environmental quality standards to protect these areas may be such that certain industries should not establish in the area. The Report observed: “This is what options are all about. If we have more of something, we may need to have less of something else, must weigh up all the issues of which we have knowledge, and make our decisions in full awareness of their consequences.” (Ministry for Conservation Victoria 1975, p3) Recent Environmental Reports Since early 2015 three landmark environmental reports have been released which have a direct impact on the environmental future of Western Port. They are as follows: The Central Region Coastal Plan (CRCP) Victorian Government DWELP 2015 http://ccb.vic.gov.au/staging/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Draft-Central-Region- Coastal-Plan.pdf 4 Preserve Western Port Action Group Submission. January 2017 The Revised Western Port Ramsar Site Management Plan (Ramsar Plan), DWELP 2016 http://www.delwp.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/326262/Western-Port-MP- Full-Draft-for-public-comment.pdf The Western Port Local Coastal Hazard Assessment, (WPLCHA), Water Technology/Melbourne Water, September 2015. http://www.seccca.org.au/project/western-port-local-coastal-hazard-assessment/ Whilst the CRCP applies to all of the Port Phillip and Western Port coastlines, it does contain some very specific references that apply to Western Port. In referring to the 2014 Victorian Coastal Policy as its source document, the chairs foreword states that the CRCP is based on the former’s hierarchy of principles, which clearly state, “protecting the natural environment” as a key goal along with “protecting significant coastal and marine ecosystems and habitats.” What is especially relevant is under the heading of “Coastal Processes and Climate Change,” the CRCP quotes the WPLCHA as a case study. The importance of this document is further highlighted via the Ramsar Plan. Under the heading “Management Strategies and responsible organisations related to living with Climate Change” at 2.1, it states: “Implement the recommendations of the WLCHA,” it then goes on to quote specific points to achieve the above. Under the same main heading but at 2.3, it states: “Investigate the risk with and potential mitigation strategies, for climate change impacts to the ecological character of the Ramsar site.” Of the three reports, perhaps the Ramsar Plan is the most important overarching document of all, in that Western Port fulfils six of the nine criteria required for a site to be listed under the Ramsar Convention. Tidal flows, dredging, and erosion Tidal flows in Western Port are unique. The deep wide entrance on the western side allows large volumes of water to enter Western Port. It has spring tides of three metres, twice a day. Swells from the deep water of Bass Strait’s incoming south- westerly tides dissipate on Middle Bank to the west of French Island, and Tortoise Head on the western extremity of French Island. The eastern entrance between Newhaven and San Remo has a tidal stream of 6–8 knots (11–15 kph). These tidal movements define the current Western Port ecosystem, beaches and land mass. The Port of Hastings is not a natural deepwater port. To establish the Port of Hastings, the North Arm of Westernport Bay was first dredged in 1964 to allow commercial shipping free passage to wharf developments on the western shoreline. This dredging involved the removal of 1.5 million cubic metres of seabed from an area of 85.4 hectares (Ministry for Conservation, 1975). 5 Preserve Western Port Action Group Submission. January 2017 More than 384,000 cubic metres of seafloor was removed during dredging works at Crib Point in 1966, and all spoil was dumped in the North Arm channel off Tankerton, French Island. Dredging at Long Island Point was completed in 1969 and most of the 450,000 cubic metres of spoil was dumped into mangroves
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dry Seasonal Conditions in Rural Victoria
    Department of Primary Industries Dry Seasonal Conditions in Rural Victoria Report: 51 September 22, 2005 Environmental Indicators Rainfall August rainfall totals were close to normal. Over winter as a whole, rainfall was somewhat above normal in the North East and in East Gippsland, somewhat below normal in Central Victoria and in West Gippsland, and near to normal elsewhere. August had a warm spell at the end of the month following the widespread snow on the 10th. Overall daytime temperatures were 1°C above average and nightime temperatures were about average. For the 6-month period from March to August, serious to severe rainfall deficiencies extend from the far southeast of South Australia across southwest and south-central Victoria to west Gippsland. The deficiencies over southern Victoria are not as extensive or intense as they were at the end of July. The most significant rainfall in September occurred through the second week and varied from 0-5 mm in the north west to over 100 mm in pockets of the North East (Figure 1). The seasonal rainfall outlook for October to December indicates an increased likelihood of below median falls over parts of southern Victoria for the December quarter. Chances of above median rainfall are between 30 and 40% in a band extending from the far southeast of South Australia to West Gippsland. This includes most of the areas that have suffered severe short-term rainfall deficiencies since the start of autumn, and a general downturn in rainfall since the mid 1990s. The chances of a wetter than average season are between 40 and 50% over the rest of the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Gippsland-Regional-Growth-Plan
    GIPPSLAND REGIONAL GROWTH PLAN BACKGROUND REPORT Acknowledgement of Country The Gippsland Local Government Network and the Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure acknowledge Aboriginal Traditional Owners within the region, their rich culture and spiritual connection to Country. We also recognise and acknowledge the contribution and interest of Aboriginal people and organisations in land use planning, land management and natural resource management. Authorised and published by the Victorian Government, 1 Treasury Place, Melbourne Printed by Finsbury Green, Melbourne If you would like to receive this publication in an accessible format, please telephone 1300 366 356. This document is also available in Word format at www.dtpli.vic.gov.au/regionalgrowthplans Unless indicated otherwise, this work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. To view a copy of the licence, visit creativecommons.org/licences/by/3.0/au It is a condition of this Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence that you must give credit to the original author who is the State of Victoria. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you, but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. March 2014 Table of contents ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Parishes in the State of Victoria
    List of Parishes in the State of Victoria Showing the County, the Land District, and the Municipality in which each is situated. (extracted from Township and Parish Guide, Department of Crown Lands and Survey, 1955) Parish County Land District Municipality (Shire Unless Otherwise Stated) Acheron Anglesey Alexandra Alexandra Addington Talbot Ballaarat Ballaarat Adjie Benambra Beechworth Upper Murray Adzar Villiers Hamilton Mount Rouse Aire Polwarth Geelong Otway Albacutya Karkarooc; Mallee Dimboola Weeah Alberton East Buln Buln Melbourne Alberton Alberton West Buln Buln Melbourne Alberton Alexandra Anglesey Alexandra Alexandra Allambee East Buln Buln Melbourne Korumburra, Narracan, Woorayl Amherst Talbot St. Arnaud Talbot, Tullaroop Amphitheatre Gladstone; Ararat Lexton Kara Kara; Ripon Anakie Grant Geelong Corio Angahook Polwarth Geelong Corio Angora Dargo Omeo Omeo Annuello Karkarooc Mallee Swan Hill Annya Normanby Hamilton Portland Arapiles Lowan Horsham (P.M.) Arapiles Ararat Borung; Ararat Ararat (City); Ararat, Stawell Ripon Arcadia Moira Benalla Euroa, Goulburn, Shepparton Archdale Gladstone St. Arnaud Bet Bet Ardno Follett Hamilton Glenelg Ardonachie Normanby Hamilton Minhamite Areegra Borug Horsham (P.M.) Warracknabeal Argyle Grenville Ballaarat Grenville, Ripon Ascot Ripon; Ballaarat Ballaarat Talbot Ashens Borung Horsham Dunmunkle Audley Normanby Hamilton Dundas, Portland Avenel Anglesey; Seymour Goulburn, Seymour Delatite; Moira Avoca Gladstone; St. Arnaud Avoca Kara Kara Awonga Lowan Horsham Kowree Axedale Bendigo; Bendigo
    [Show full text]
  • Geelong Ballarat Bendigo Gippsland Western Victoria Northern Victoria
    Project Title Council Area Grant Support GEELONG Growth Areas Transport Infrastructure Strategy Greater Geelong (C) $50,000 $50,000 Stormwater Service Strategy Greater Geelong (C) $100,000 Bannockburn South West Precinct Golden Plains (S) $60,000 $40,000 BALLARAT Ballarat Long Term Growth Options Ballarat (C) $25,000 $25,000 Bakery Hill Urban Renewal Project Ballarat (C) $150,000 Latrobe Street Saleyards Urban Renewal Ballarat (C) $60,000 BENDIGO Unlocking Greater Bendigo's potential Greater Bendigo (C) $130,000 $135,000 GIPPSLAND Wonthaggi North East PSP and DCP Bass Coast (S) $25,000 Developer Contributions Plan - 5 Year Review Baw Baw (S) $85,000 South East Traralgon Precinct Structure Plan Latrobe (C) $50,000 West Sale Industrial Area - Technical reports Wellington (S) $80,000 WESTERN VICTORIA Ararat in Transition - an action plan Ararat (S) $35,000 Portland Industrial Land Strategy Glenelg (S) $40,000 $15,000 Mortlake Industrial Land Supply Moyne (S) $75,000 $25,000 Southern Hamilton Central Activation Master Plan $90,000 Grampians (S) Allansford Strategic Framework Plan Warrnambool (C) $30,000 Parwan Employment Precinct Moorabool (S) $100,000 $133,263 NORTHERN VICTORIA Echuca West Precinct Structure Plan Campaspe (S) $50,000 Yarrawonga Framework Plan Moira (S) $50,000 $40,000 Shepparton Regional Health and Tertiary Grt. Shepparton (C) $30,000 $30,000 Education Hub Structure Plan (Shepparton) Broadford Structure Plan – Investigation Areas Mitchell (S) $50,000 Review Seymour Urban Renewal Precinct Mitchell (S) $50,000 Benalla Urban
    [Show full text]
  • Bass Coast Rail Trail Case Study
    01 IndustrIal HerItage Case studies in 2013, with Glen Forbes in 2014 and a timber rail viaduct, railway stations, Bass Coast Kernot in 2016. Once completed the trail remnants of mines and mining activity will be 50 kilometres long. (including a largely intact mullock heap Rail Trail This ongoing, long-term project began at Mitchell’s Mine and four miner’s cottages at Wonthaggi). Bass Coast Shire, Gippsland, ViC in 1994 and continues today. The trail is managed and developed by the Bass The trail site is adjacent to the old State The Bass Coast Rail Trail is one Coast Shire Council. Coal Mine at Wonthaggi, Mitchell’s Mine Historic Reserve and the historic of a series of rail trails that reuse Site history and heritage cemetery at Kilcunda, coastal reserves defunct railway corridors as linear The Bass Coast Rail Trail is part of a and the Wonthaggi Wetlands. recreational parks. Located in former branch railway from Nyora to The rail corridor had important remnant Wonthaggi, which opened in 1910 to carry South Gippsland, the Bass Coast vegetation and provided biological corridors coal from the Wonthaggi State Coal Mine Rail Trail moves through between other areas of remnant bush. farmland, coastal bushland, to Melbourne, and to service the region’s farms and agricultural industries. Challenges historic coal mining reserves and along the Gippsland coastline. The coal mine closed in 1968 and, When the Committee of Management took following declining rail usage, the railway over in 1994 there was “nothing but clay, The trail has particularly strong itself was closed in 1978.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Invader Weeds Update Friends of WESI: Weeds at the Early Stage of Invasion Project
    Early Invader Weeds Update Friends of WESI: Weeds at the Early Stage of Invasion Project August 2020 Issue #20 Welcome to the Winter issue of Working with weeds can be both physically and mentally challenging at the best of times, it can be the Early Invader Weeds Update costly, time consuming, labour intensive and difficult to see an end. It’s understandable that these feelings may WESI working from home be enhanced now and some of you working in this field may be feeling those extra challenges. It is hard to believe that like many others, for the last 6 months, the WESI team has been working from home. We hope that you, the Friends of WESI, have been coping as best you can be and that you have plenty of Generally, we have adapted well to the working from support around you. Please reach out to your peers and home arrangement and have been lucky to be able to colleagues for support if you do not feel like you are continue most aspects of the project. coping. It might just be an ear to listen or some advice on how they are managing. There has been challenges and our moods haven’t always been positive and uplifting, but we frequently Take a break to read this issue, we hope that you find it remind ourselves that this is ok and quite a normal useful and enjoy the read. reaction for these times. We’ve learnt to recognise this feeling and ways to manage our work-life balance, now that work is always with us in our homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Heating Works to the New Gippsland Regional Aquatic Centre (GRAC) Traralgon (VIC)
    Edition No. 1 2 0 20 Geothermal heating works to the new Gippsland Regional Aquatic Centre (GRAC) Traralgon (VIC) Planned Gippsland Aquatic Center, Labrobe, Victoria, Australia (source: Peddle Thorp Architects) GRAC geothermal heating project description For the Latrobe City Council, the new Gippsland Regional Aquatic Centre (GRAC) in Traralgon (Victoria) has been developed (www.latrobe.vic.gov.au/grac). Designed to have a strong sustainability focus, the GRAC is the first public aquatic facility in Victoria to incorporate a geothermal heating system to warm up the GRAC pools. This geothermal heating system is utilising The Latrobe Valley aquifers, which have abundant heat, with geothermal gradients up to 7.3˚C/100 mtr. and are ideal for direct use for geothermal heating. This environmentally friendly, sustainable geothermal energy source is a key component of this project. It will assist in significantly reducing the carbon footprint while also aiding in substantial energy costs savings every year. Aquatherm Australia Pty Ltd Unit 6, 16 Mavis Street Revesby NSW 2212 I T: (02) 9774 1172 I F: (02) 9774 3619 I E: [email protected] I www.aquatherm.com.au Edition No. 1 2 0 20 The geothermal production bore taps into the aquifer below Traralgon and provides access to ground water located between 636 and 642 mtr. below ground. The water temperature at this depth is approximately 65˚C-68˚C. The bore holes have an internal diameter of 200mm. A submersible pump was installed down the hole to extract this hot geothermal water and deliver it to plate heat exchangers, located in the GRAC plant room.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Port Ramsar Site Strategic Management Plan
    Western Port Ramsar Site Strategic Management Plan Department of Sustainability and Environment Parks Victoria developed this Strategic Management Plan in conjunction with the Department of Sustainability and Environment and key stakeholders and coordinated the public comment process on the draft document. This report was prepared with financial support from the National Wetlands Program, under the Natural Heritage Trust. © The State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2003 This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced, copied, transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical or graphic) without the prior written permission of the State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment. All requests and enquires should be directed to the Copyright Officer, Library Information Services, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 240 Victoria Parade, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002. Disclaimers This publication may be of assistance to you and every effort has been made to ensure that the information in the report is accurate. The Department of Sustainability and Environment does not guarantee that the report is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. The views and opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Commonwealth Government of Australia, the Federal Minister for Environment and Heritage, or Environment Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Priorities for the Regions
    Version 0.1 Infrastructure Priorities for the Regions Key findings to inform Victoria’s 30-year infrastructure strategy update December 2020 Table of Contents 1. Executive summary .............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Summary of recommendations ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. A regional lens to prioritise infrastructure ......................................................................................................... 8 2.1 An overview of our approach .................................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Introducing the frameworks ................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Comparative advantage framework ........................................................................................................ 11 2.2.2 Addressing regional disadvantage framework ........................................................................................ 14 2.3 Drafting recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 16 2.4 Stakeholder submissions .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Western Port Recreational Boating Guide
    Jobname : 69781 Maps Resolution : $[ResolutionX] $[ResolutionY] ProofProfile $[ICCProoferProfile] Signature : Map Brochure ScreenSys : $[ScreenSystem] PressProfile $[ICCPressProfile] Sheet/Color : FB 001 1 Front BlackCyanMagentaYellow ScreenRuling : $[ScreenRuling] PaperDim 94.0 * 66.0 cm Linearization : $[LinearizationCurve] DotShape : $[DotShape] Date/Time 25/05/2011 3:32:56 PM ProcessCal : $[ProcessCalCurve] Template : ImposePDF_LowRes CMY B C M Y B 70 C 70 CMY B C M Y M 70 CMY B C M Y CM CY CMY B C M Y Y 70 CMY B C M Y MY CMY CMY B C M Y M 70 CMY B C M Y slurC CMY B C M Y CMY B C M Y B 70 C 70 CMY B C M Y M 70 CMY B C M Y slurM CMY B C M Y Y 70 CMY B C M Y slurY CMY B C M Y C 70 CMY B C M Y Prinect 4GSi Format 102/105 Dipco 10.01b (pdf) © 2010 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG CMY B C M Y M 70 CMY B C M Y CM CY CMY B C M Y Y 70 CMY B C M Y MY CMY CMY B C M Y M 70 CMY B C M Y slurC CMY B C M Y CMY B C M Y B 70 C 70 CMY B C M Y M 70 CMY B C M Y slurM CMY B C M YY 70CMY B C M Y slurY CMY B C M Y C 70 CMY B C M Y slurB CMY B C M Y −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 1 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 2 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 3 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 4 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 5 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 6 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 7 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 8 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 9 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 10 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 11 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 12 −−−−−−−−−−−−−− B = B −−−−−−−−−−−−−− 14 −−−−−−−−−−−−−− C = C −−−−−−−−−−−−−− 16 −−−−−−−−−−−−− M = M −−−−−−−−−−−−− 18 −−−−−−−−−−−−−− Y = Y −−−−−−−−−−−−−− 20 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 21 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 22 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 23 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 24 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 25 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 26 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 27 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−
    [Show full text]
  • Band 1 HCSG Departmental Contacts
    Health Condition Support Grants Contact Details Band 1 (previously Health Self Help Funding Program) For enquiries regarding Band 1 grants, please speak to the contact in your closest Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Regional Office. Contacts are listed below: Metropolitan Regions North & West Metropolitan Southern Metropolitan Contact Person: Izabela Andersen Contact Person: Lyn Wright Address: 145 Smith St, Fitzroy, 3065 Address: 165-169 Thomas St, Dandenong, 3175 Telephone: (03) 9412 5335 Telephone: (03) 8765 7540 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Eastern Metropolitan Contact: Liliana Bartolomeo (Tues, Wed, Thurs) Address: 820 Whitehorse Rd, Box Hill, 3128 Telephone: (03) 9843 1733 Email: [email protected] Rural Regions Barwon South Western Gippsland Contact Person: Jessie Suomalainen Contact Person: Brooke Campbell Address: Cnr Fenwick & Little Malop Sts, Address: 64 Church Street, Traralgon, 3844 Geelong, 3220 Telephone: (03) 5177 2608 Telephone: (03) 5226 4544 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Grampians Contact Person: Max Dean Contact Person: John Koopmans Address: 35 Armstrong St.Sth., Ballarat, 3350 Address: 35 Armstrong St.Sth., Ballarat, 3350 Telephone: (03) 5333 6077 Telephone: (03) 5333 6020 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Hume Loddon-Mallee Contact Person: Philomena Sawyer Contact Person: Jenny Collins Address: 55 Hovell St, Wodonga, 3690 Address: 74-78 Queen St, Bendigo,
    [Show full text]
  • The Aboriginal Protectorate on the Mornington Peninsula,1839–1840
    8. The raid into Gippsland and the massacres remembered The evidence for the pre-contact massacre which occurred between Kangerong and Arthurs Seat, at Buckkermitterwarrer, comes into the records in the context of the Bonurong raid into Gippsland in February 1840. Thomas was embarrassed that his blacks had deceived him – after this raid, he understood better the meanings of their actions; if they left the women and children behind, and took spears, it meant trouble for him. It is an interesting comment on how well they were reading power and authority at that time, that though they successfully kept knowledge of the purpose of the raid into Gippsland from Thomas, they had no qualms about being frank with the young Samuel Rawson who was told that it was a revenge raid,1 while Thomas had to work it out for himself from behaviours. After this raid Thomas obliged them to give him mudmaps of their proposed routes and estimations of their time away on their journeys. He was appalled that they brought back flesh, and he could scarcely credit that they exulted in the event. Bypassing the Chief Protector, he reported this raid directly to La Trobe. Then he set about investigating the raid by seemingly innocuous questions to various participants. It is only through this investigation that we can discover firm facts about the Two Fold Bay2 tribe’s earlier massacre of nearly half the Bonurong – men, women and children at Buckkermitterwarrer: two other raids, one at Brighton and one at Jamieson’s at the Kunnung River are also recalled.
    [Show full text]