DOCSLIB.ORG

Taxing Ride-Sharing Services in New York by Timothy P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taxing Ride-Sharing Services in New York by Timothy P Volume 85, Number 10 ¢ September 4, 2017 Taxing Ride-Sharing Services in New York by Timothy P. Noonan and Joshua K. Lawrence Reprinted from State Tax Notes, September 4, 2017, p. 943 © Tax Analysts 2017. All rights reserved. does not claim copyright in any public domain or third party content. NOONAN'S NOTES state tax notes® Taxing Ride-Sharing Services in New York by Timothy P. Noonan and Joshua K. Lawrence “for-hire” vehicles flood the streets. The arrival of app-based ride-hailing services like Uber and Lyft in the Big Apple presented yet another twist: Where do they fit in the already tricky tax structure? But at least for the newly christened ride-sharing services operating outside of New York state, the tax implications are simple and straightforward. Application-based ride-sharing services will pay a flat 4 percent assessment on all intrastate trips originating outside of New York City. The fact that the New York State Legislature settled on an “assessment” rather than placing upstate ride-sharing under the general sales and Timothy P. Noonan is a partner in the Buffalo use tax umbrella is perhaps the legislation’s most and New York offices of Hodgson Russ LLP. notable tax aspect. Joshua K. Lawrence is a partner in the firm’s Buffalo office. Assessment on Trips Outside the City In this edition of Noonan’s Notes, the authors In a technical memorandum released just say that New York’s recently enacted 4 percent assessment on ride-sharing services may seem ahead of the effective date for ride-sharing straightforward on the surface, but in fact has services, the New York State Department of complex tax issues embedded in it. Taxation and Finance explained the 4 percent assessment, recordkeeping requirements, filing 1 Ride-sharing services such as Uber requirements, and other issues. Under the new Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. got the legislative law, a transportation network company (TNC), green light in June to begin operating statewide in which is subject to the assessment, is defined as New York, after years of being confined to New “any person or entity that is licensed by the York City. The legislation permitting those [Department of Motor Vehicles] that operates in services outside the city took effect June 29, and New York state exclusively through the use of a the first Ubers were prowling the upstate grid in digital network to connect passengers with 2 time for the July 4 weekend. This expansion of drivers to provide TNC prearranged trips.” In ride-sharing throughout the state and the rapid other words, Uber, Lyft, or any competing growth of the industry itself raises some transportation service that offers prearranged interesting state and local tax issues. For tax practitioners in New York City and 1 state, navigating how sales and use tax has See TSB-M-17(1)S (June 23, 2017). 2 applied to taxicabs, black cars, limousines, Id.; see also, N.Y. Tax Law section 1291(c), as added by L. 2017, affiliated livery services, and other transportation ch. 59, pt. AAA section 18. A prearranged trip means “the transportation provided by a TNC driver to a passenger that: (1) is services has meant sifting through confusing rules arranged through the use of a TNC’s digital network; and (2) begins when a TNC driver accepts a passenger’s trip request, continues and distinctions, particularly in and around New through the transport of the passenger, and ends when the last York City — where all sorts of “street hail” and requesting passenger exits the vehicle.” STATE TAX NOTES, SEPTEMBER 4, 2017 943 For more State Tax Notes content, please visit www.taxnotes.com. © Tax Analysts 2017. All rights reserved. does not claim copyright in any public domain or third party content. NOONAN'S NOTES trips exclusively through a digital platform is in the legislation itself — earmarked for localities subject to the tax. and transit programs.9 The assessment is expected The 4 percent assessment is calculated on the to generate $24 million in state revenue per year.10 gross trip fare of each intrastate TNC trip originating outside New York City.3 Unlike New What About Ride-Sharing in New York City? York’s sales tax, which is imposed on the customer To understand TNCs’ statewide tax but collected by the vendor, the tax is levied on the obligations, it’s helpful to explore how taxicabs TNC itself, rather than on passengers. But like and various livery transportation services have sales tax reporting, TNCs are required to file a been taxed within and outside New York City. The quarterly return, due 30 days after the end of the sales tax on in-state transportation service took quarter. The first returns and payments are due effect in 2009. The tax law defines transportation 4 October 30. service, generally, as: The 4 percent assessment represents just one piece of a large legislative package governing all The service of transporting, carrying or aspects of the ride-sharing industry — including conveying a person or persons by livery licensing requirements, insurance obligations, service; whether to a single destination or and driver and vehicle requirements.5 The New to multiple destinations; and whether the York City Taxi and Limousine Commission has compensation paid by or on behalf of the and will continue to regulate the industry within passenger is based on mileage, trip, time 11 the city. Until the legislation, effective June 29, consumed or any other basis. ride-sharing had not been authorized outside of But traditional taxicabs and buses have been the city. The issue of how ride-sharing should be exempt since that law was enacted, and the ride- taxed outside New York City emerged as one of sharing legislation that took effect June 29 the key points of debate in the ride-sharing amended the definition to exclude TNC rides legislation. An Assembly bill proposed subjecting subject to the 4 percent assessment (that is, TNC ride-sharing trips to the existing sales and use tax 12 6 trips originating outside New York City). Seems on intrastate transportation services, which simple enough, but that leaves other livery would have allowed counties to impose a local services subject to sales tax statewide. The tax law sales tax on top of the 4 percent statewide sales defines livery service generally as “service tax. A Senate proposal called for a 2 percent provided by a limousine, black car, or other motor assessment rather than a sales tax, with 50 percent vehicle, with a driver” (excluding taxis and of the revenue earmarked for the state’s dedicated buses).13 In 2010, however, an exemption was bridge and highway fund, and the other 50 carved out for “affiliated livery vehicles” percent allocated to a special fund to assist local 14 7 operating in New York City. That covers livery transit programs. Meanwhile, Democratic Gov. vehicles seating six persons or fewer that don’t Andrew Cuomo’s own executive proposal had qualify as black cars or luxury limousines, called for a 5.5 percent assessment, with 20 provided the trip originates or terminates in the percent of revenue specially marked for local city.15 transit programs.8 Ultimately, the new law included the 4 percent assessment, with all revenue allocated to the 9 See N.Y. Tax Law section 1298, as added by L. 2017, ch. 59, pt. general fund and no special allocations — at least AAA section 18. 10 See Press Release, Assembly member Kevin A. Cahill (D), “Assemblyman Cahill Welcomes Ride-Hailing to Upstate New 3 York and Long Island” (Apr. 8, 2017). N.Y. Tax Law section 1292, as added by L. 2017, ch. 59, pt. AAA 11 N.Y. Tax Law section 1101(b)(34). section 18. 12 4 See TSB-M-17(1)S. Id. 13 5 L. 2017, ch. 59, pt. AAA. Id. 14 6 See A. 06661, 2017-18 reg. sess. section 14. See TSB-M-10(15)S (Aug. 27, 2010); and TSB-M-13(2)S (Feb. 25, 7 2013) (expanding exemption to trips beginning or ending within See S. 04159, 2017-18 reg. sess. section 16. New York City). 8 15 See FY 2018 Executive Budget, Article VII bill, pt. G section 15. See TSB-M-10(15)S. 944 STATE TAX NOTES, SEPTEMBER 4, 2017 For more State Tax Notes content, please visit www.taxnotes.com. © Tax Analysts 2017. All rights reserved. does not claim copyright in any public domain or third party content. NOONAN'S NOTES But defining the difference between an • Ride-sharing trips by TNCs originating exempt affiliated livery car and a black car in New within New York City continue to be subject York City has also been a nuanced exercise for to state and local sales and use tax if the trip New York City purposes. The tax law doesn’t is intrastate. define the term, and the department’s policy • In contrast, intrastate ride-sharing trips by guidance offers only that a black car is a “for-hire TNCs that originate outside New York City vehicle . dispatched from a central facility.”16 are subject to the 4 percent assessment on The Taxi and Limousine Commission’s TNCs. regulations provide a bit more, defining a black • Other types of livery services (excluding car as a vehicle dispatched from a “central taxicabs and buses) outside of the TNC facility” where: definition continue to be subject to sales and • all vehicles are dispatched on a pre- use tax statewide on intrastate trips within arranged basis (for example, by phone); and outside New York City. However, the • all vehicles are owned by franchisees of the exemption for affiliated livery vehicles (that facility or members of the entity that is, non-TNC cars with a six-person capacity operates the facility; and that don’t qualify as black cars or luxury • more than 90 percent of the revenue comes limousines) covers trips that either begin or from payment means other than cash paid end in New York City.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Canadian Taxi Wars, 1925–1950 Donald F
    Document généré le 28 sept. 2021 00:03 Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine The Canadian Taxi Wars, 1925–1950 Donald F. Davis Volume 27, numéro 1, october 1998 Résumé de l'article Entre 1925 et 1950, il y a eu dans la plupart des grandes villes canadiennes une URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1016609ar guerre des taxis qui a fait s’effondrer à la fois les tarifs et les revenus des DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/1016609ar chauffeurs. À l’origine de ces guerres : la facilité à entrer dans l’industrie. À la fin des années vingt en effet, les propriétaires de véhicules s’aperçurent que Aller au sommaire du numéro pour faire des profits, ils n’étaient pas obligés d’acheter une concession, de posséder un véhicule construit selon des normes spéciales, de s’équiper d’un central téléphonique et d’un taximètre. Les plus vieilles compagnies qui Éditeur(s) avaient investi dans ces équipements ont réussi en 1950 à persuader les grandes villes canadiennes — y compris Winnipeg et Vancouver, les deux dont Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine il est ici question — d’appliquer l’actuelle réglementation. L’imposition de tarifs uniformes, de taximètres, de salaires minimums, ISSN d’assurance-responsabilité ainsi que de quotas limitant l’accès à l’industrie (par le système des licences) ont réussi à mettre fin aux guerres du taxi. Si 0703-0428 (imprimé) l’industrie a ensuite fonctionné d’une façon moins chaotique et plus éthique, le 1918-5138 (numérique) nouveau régime en a toutefois réduit la souplesse et l’a, par le fait même, rendue moins utile pour le déplacement des masses urbaines.
    [Show full text]
  • Easychair Preprint New York City Medallion Market's Rise, Fall, And
    EasyChair Preprint № 55 New York City Medallion Market's Rise, Fall, and Regulation Implications Sherraina Song EasyChair preprints are intended for rapid dissemination of research results and are integrated with the rest of EasyChair. April 9, 2018 New York City Medallion Market’s Rise, Fall, and Regulation Implications Sherraina Song Shrewsbury High School, Shrewsbury, MA, 01545, USA [email protected] Abstract. Capping the number of licenses giving exclusive right to street hailing passengers, the New York City medallion system manipulated the demand and supply of taxicab market and made the Yellow Cab medallion not only a commodity of scarcity and but also an investment product hotly pursued. Since 1937, the medallion market evolved and experienced four phases of birth, formation, booming, and collapse and is fighting a losing battle against the newly emerged app-based, ride-sharing service providers like Uber and Lyft. This article presented the findings from mining the data made available by the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission, conducted analysis, and argued the deregulation of the New York City taxicab industry has started and that should not and will not be turned back. Keywords: New York City Taxicab, Yellow Cab Taxis, Medallion, Uber, Lyft, TLC, Taxi & Limousine Commission, Green Cab Taxis, For-Hire Vehicle, SHV, App-based, Ride-sharing New York City Taxicab The New York City (NYC) taxicab market is one of about one million passengers per day and annual revenue of two billion US dollars. Thanks to government regulations, there are two sectors of taxicab services in New York City– street hailing and pre- arranged pick-up and three major classes of taxi cabs - Yellow Taxi Cab (Yellow Cab), For-Hire Vehicles (FHVs), and Street Hail Livery (SHL) Street hailer service providers can pick up passengers in response to a street hail.
    [Show full text]
  • Robbery of Taxi Drivers
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services Problem-Oriented Guides for Police Problem-Specific Guides Series No. 34 Robbery of Taxi Drivers By Martha J. Smith www.cops.usdoj.gov Center for Problem-Oriented Policing Got a Problem? We’ve got answers! Log on to the Center for Problem-Oriented Policing website at www.popcenter.org for a wealth of information to help www.PopCenter.org you deal more effectively with crime and disorder in your community, including: • Web-enhanced versions of all currently available Guides • Interactive training exercises • On-line access to research and police practices • An on-line problem analysis module Designed for police and those who work with them to address community problems, www.popcenter.org is a great resource in problem-oriented policing. Problem-Oriented Guides for Police Problem-Specific Guides Series Guide No. 34 Robbery of Taxi Drivers Martha J. Smith This project was supported by cooperative agreement #2004CKWXK002 by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Department of Justice. References to specific companies, products, or services should not be considered an endorsement of the product by the author or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement discussion of the issues. www.cops.usdoj.gov ISBN: 1-932582-50-9 March 2005 About the Problem-Specific Guides Series i About the Problem-Specific Guides Series The Problem-Specific Guides summarize knowledge about how police can reduce the harm caused by specific crime and disorder problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Overdrive: Taxi Regulations, Market Concentration
    Regulatory Overdrive Taxi Regulations, Market Concentration and Service Availability by Samuel R. Staley, Ph.D., Catherine Annis and Matthew Kelly TAXI October 2018 Regulatory Overdrive Taxi Regulations, Market Concentration and Service Availability Executive Summary Traditional taxis are highly regulated in most American cities, with local regulators determining everything from how many taxis can be licensed to the types of services they can provide to the fares they can charge to where they can pick up customers. Ridesharing apps like Uber and Lyft, meanwhile, operate with comparatively few regulatory constraints, and there is little reason to believe consumers are faring any worse for it. In fact, consumers are increasingly voting with their feet—or phones—and choosing ridesharing services over taxis. This prompts an important policy question: Does traditional taxi regulation make sense in a world with ridesharing? To begin to answer this question, this study reviews the taxi regulations and market characteristics of 44 major U.S. cities. Specifically, it explores (1) the relationship between taxi regulations and concentration of ownership within a city’s taxi industry and (2) the relationship between concentrated ownership and taxi availability. Key findings include: • All 44 cities studied regulate taxis tightly, adopting five of 10 major regulatory provisions on average, but the specific regulations they use vary widely. This suggests cities are making taxi policy absent a common understanding of what regulatory provisions, if any, are necessary to protect consumers. • Taxi markets tend to be highly concentrated. In the average city, the top three taxi firms control about 61 percent of the taxi vehicles operating there.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices Studies of Taxi Regulation Managing Taxi Supply
    San Francisco Municipal Transportation Best Practices Studies of Taxi Regulation Managing Taxi Supply (***DRAFT***) Best Practices Studies of Taxi Regulation Managing Taxi Supply ***Draft*** Prepared for: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency By: Hara Associates Inc. Bayswater Square, 1066 Somerset Street West, Suite 406, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4T3 613-722-5528, 613-482-4901 (fax), www.haraassociates.com/taxi and Corey, Canapary & Galanis 447 Sutter Street, Penthouse North, San Francisco, CA 94108-4601 415-397-1200, 415-433-3809 (fax), www.ccgresearch.com Hara Associates Reference: 1517 April 3, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... i 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT ..................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 SOME IMPORTANT TERMS .............................................................................................................................. 1-2 2 INDUSTRY STRUCTURE AND ISSSUES 2-1 2.1 A QUICK SKETCH: TAXIS IN SAN FRANCISCO ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 TAXI SHORTAGE: CUSTOMERS ARE NOT BEING SERVED ................................................................................ 2-2 2.3 FAILURE IN THE DISPATCH MARKET ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jacobs V. Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc., 2017 IL App (1St) 151107
    Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Jacobs v. Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc., 2017 IL App (1st) 151107 Appellate Court MARC M. JACOBS, and DEBORAH JACOBS, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Caption v. YELLOW CAB AFFILIATION, INC., and CORNELIUS C. EZEAGU, Defendants-Appellants. District & No. First District, Fourth Division Docket No. 1-15-1107 Filed March 16, 2017 Decision Under Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County, No. 15-L-04995; the Review Hon. Daniel J. Lynch, Judge, presiding. Judgment Affirmed. Counsel on Steven R. Bonanno, Carlton D. Fisher, and Anne C. Couyoumjian, of Appeal Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, and Richard C. Godfrey, R. Christopher Heck, and Catherine L. Fitzpatrick, of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, both of Chicago, for appellant Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc. Kevin Q. Butler, Cornelius E. McKnight, Stanley A. Kitzinger, Nathan P. Karlsgodt, Joanne M. Krol, and Bryan T. Butcher, of McKnight Kitzinger & Pravdic LLC, of Chicago, for other appellant. Robert A. Clifford, of Clifford Law Office, and Timothy S. Tomasik and Patrick Giese, of Tomasik Kotin Kasserman LLC, both of Chicago, for appellees. Webster Chamberlain & Bean LLP, of Washington D.C. (Arthur L. Herold, of counsel), for amicus curiae Taxicab, Limousine & Paratransit Association. Panel JUSTICE McBRIDE delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Presiding Justice Ellis concurred in the judgment and opinion. Justice Cobbs dissented, with opinion. OPINION ¶ 1 Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc. (YCA), was sued as the apparent principal of Chicago taxicab driver Cornelius C. Ezeagu, whose alleged negligence while exiting a highway caused a high speed crash and severe traumatic brain injuries to his passenger, attorney Marc M. Jacobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Local and State Partnerships with Taxicab Companies
    January 2012 NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM Responsible Senior Program Officer: Gwen Chisholm Smith Research Results Digest 366 LOCAL AND STATE PARTNERSHIPS WITH TAXICAB COMPANIES This digest presents the results of NCHRP Project 20-65, Task 30, “Local Practices in Developing Coordination Partnerships with Taxicab Companies.” The project was conducted by Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates of San Francisco, CA, with Total Contract Solutions, Little Elm, TX, under subcontract to ICF International, Sacramento, CA. David Koffman of Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates was the Principal Investigator. The other authors of this digest were Ellen Oettinger of Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates and Charles Johnson of Total Contract Solutions. CHAPTER 1—INTRODUCTION nerships work in practice, what barriers AND SUMMARY have had to be overcome, and steps taken to overcome these barriers. This research was undertaken to identify Following this introduction and sum- how states and local governments can best mary of lessons from the case studies, the promote partnerships with taxicab compa- balance of this digest consists of a presen- nies for provision of public transportation. A tation of the survey results, 23 case studies, “partnership” typically involves some form and previous research. of contract for service, but also includes less formal arrangements as well as regulatory CONTENTS involvement intended to expand or create Types of Partnerships Chapter 1—Introduction and service for the public. An expansive under- and Case Studies Summary, 1 standing of “public transportation” has been Eight kinds of partnerships between Chapter 2—Survey Results, 7 applied including not just service provided public agencies and taxicabs have been iden- Chapter 3—General Public by public transit agencies but service for all Dial-a-Ride, 18 tified and studied in this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Taximeter Technology Advancements
    Taximeter Technology Advancements Professor Matthew W. Daus, Esq. 98th Annual Meeting of National Conference on Weights and Measures July 16, 2013 — Louisville, Kentucky Presented By Professor Matthew W. Daus, Esq. • Former NYC Taxi & Limousine Commissioner/Chair • Distinguished Lecturer, University Transportation Research Center (UTRC) • President, International Association of Transportation Regulators (IATR) • Partner & Chairman, Transportation Practice Group Contact: [email protected] 156 West 56th Street | New York, NY 10019 T. 212.237.1106 | F. 212.262.1215 In the beginning…. A hansom cab at Madison Square, New York, circa 1900 First Taxi Technology? The modern taximeter was invented by Wilhelm Bruhn in 1891 For a long time, much has not changed until recently… Argo Taxi Cab Meter Efficient Instruments Corp. New York, Made in Germany Taxi Technology New York City (T-PEP) Taxi Passenger Enhancement Program •Global Positioning Systems (GPS) •Passenger Information Monitors (PIMs) •Driver Information Monitors (DIMs) •Credit & Debit Card Swipes (RFID) T-PEP Program – Functionality & Benefits •Fully Integrated System •Basic Functionality •Driver Benefits: •Business opportunities •Emergency & other information •Passenger Benefits: •Lost property return – faster and more options •Convenience – easier tipping methods •Reduced costs vs. other transport modes (e.g. black cars/limos) •Passenger info.- news, advertising, government •Data Collection Taxi, Livery, Black Car, Limousine……. Yes, there is an app for all that, but… 9 Is it the “Wild West”? 10 Taxi Smartphone Applications As technology innovations continue, more and more resources are available via smartphone applications. Hailing a taxicab or arranging for transportation via a for- hire vehicle is no exception. Technology start-up and transportation companies have started to flood the market with smartphone applications.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of New York Taxicab Medallions
    Problematic Private Property: The Case of New York Taxicab Medallions Katrina Miriam Wymant Yellow taxicabs are an iconic symbol of New York City. Almost as well- known as the City's yellow taxis are the valuable licenses that vehicles must have in order to be used as taxis. Often called medallions, these licenses constitute a form of private property. They are routinely bought and sold, leased, used as collateralfor loans, and count as assets in bankruptcy. This Article emphasizes the political character of property rights in the modern state through a case study of why New York taxi medallions continue to exist. Prominent explanations of the evolution of property rights imply that they are a distinct category of rights that emerge organically within society because their benefits exceed their costs. This Article takes a decidedly more regulatory view of property rights as top-down creations of the state. As instruments of the state, property rights arise and persist from political decision-making processes influenced by interest group pressures. This avowedly regulatory conception of property rights suggests that we likely have both efficient and inefficient property rights because there is no necessary correspondence between what is cost-beneficial for society as a whole and the outcomes of political decision-makingprocesses. This Article argues that New York taxicab licenses are an instance of inefficient private property rights sustained by political decision-makingprocesses subject to pressuresfrom powerful interest groups. T Professor,
    [Show full text]
  • The 21St Century Taxi Driver: an Examination of the Hidden Injuries of Race in Urban Canada
    7. The 21st Century Taxi Driver: An Examination of the Hidden Injuries of Race in Urban Canada Lorne Foster__________________________________ “I saw the funniest thing the other day … a White guy driving a cab.” – Russell Peters, Stand-up Comedian from Toronto 1. Introduction Canadian narratives on foreign credentials routinely refer to taxi drivers. Stories abound in everyday life regarding immigrants with foreign medical degrees and PhDs forced to drive taxi cabs in order to make a living. In the light of a growing awareness of such wasted immigrant talent, the search for practical and sustainable solutions has acquired a sense of urgency. However, what lacks focus in the dominant public discourse is that the underutilization of immigrant knowledge and skills, observed in the taxi industry as well as other low-pay-low-prestige service sectors, is also an experience almost exclusively reserved for racially visible newcomers. Despite the preponderance of people of colour with devalued credentials, the mainstream public image of the credentialed foreigner in Canada is ‘deracialized’ as a general workplace malfunction rather than a political action. So, to date, the collective consciousness and public articulation of the ‘foreign credentials gap’ is slightly out of sync with the historical reality that underutilized foreign credentialed knowledge is not a generic phenomenon, thereby diverting attention from relevant and critical information needed to ensure sound judgments in social policy. This chapter engages some historical discourses on ‘pushing cab’ in order to illustrate how the taxi industry in contemporary urban Canada has evolved into a ‘brown collar ghetto.’ It argues that the 21st century big-city taxi driver as an ideal type must be understood in the context of global processes, as both a symbol of the foreign credentials gap and as an urban adaptation of people of colour living in the interstices of a dominant White cultural hegemony.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Taxicabs for Unbanked Households: an Exploratory Analysis in New York City
    Access to Taxicabs for Unbanked Households: An Exploratory Analysis in New York City Juan Francisco Saldarriaga David A. King Columbia University Arizona State University New York, NY, USA Phoenix, AZ, USA [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Taxicabs are a critical aspect of the public transit system in New The literature on the underbanked rarely mentions York City. The yellow cabs that are ubiquitous in Manhattan are transportation. Within the transportation literature, ability to pay as iconic as the city’s subway system, and in recent years green is generally considered a function of income or wages. In the taxicabs were introduced by the city to improve taxi service in case of the underbanked, however, ability to pay must also areas outside of the central business districts and airports. include the fare payment media. There have been some studies Approximately 500,000 taxi trips are taken daily, carrying about where scholars have examined how the adoption of smart cards 800,000 passengers, and not including other livery firms such as for transit fares may be affected by income, immigrant status Uber, Lyft or Carmel. Since 2008 yellow taxis have been able to and other factors (Yoh, Iseki et al. 2006). Within transit process fare payments with credit cards, and credits cards are a payments, low income riders tend to not take advantage of growing share of total fare payments. However, the use of credit volume discounts or unlimited fares, which is likely caused by cards to pay for taxi fares varies widely across neighborhoods, their precarious financial straits. But all of these examinations and there are strong correlations between cash payments for taxi assume that users are at least able to access transit services or fares and the presence of unbanked or underbanked populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Coachella Valley Taxi Study
    Coachella Valley Taxi Study By Tennessee Transportation & Logistics Foundation TTLF Ray A. Mundy, Ph.D Tel. (314) 225 – 7039 Fax. (314) 516-7272 Email: [email protected] Website: www.umsl.edu/~cts April 20, 2007 Executive Summary Coachella Valley Taxi Study The Coachella Valley taxi industry was studied through a series of personal interviews, surveys, and data analysis. It is the opinion of this reviewer that the industry is in a state of decline with respect to service levels, cost, efficient operations, and public image. Even with rates among the highest in the Nation, tourist and local users alike experience service in old vehicles, sometimes rude drivers, drivers predisposed to take the longer route, and sometimes drivers unwilling to take the short trip. Taxicab company owners, managers, and drivers alike all report that there are too many taxis in the valley for anyone to make a decent living. The number of taxis within the valley has increased from 175 vehicles to 265 in only a few years. Significant structural changes will be required if services and public image are to be improved and the taxi industry returned to economic health. The Palm Springs International Airport is experiencing the most rapid deterioration of taxicab service. Each day more and more authorized taxicabs are entering the taxi holding area spreading the existing demand among more and more drivers. In the past Coachella Valley taxi drivers could go into the airport taxi holding area after dropping off a customer at the airport. Now, most drivers of radio dispatched, full service taxi companies, choose to ignore the airport pick up market due to the longer wait times which can stretch into two or three hours between pickups.
    [Show full text]