US Marine Corps Vietnam War
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
US Marine Corps Vietnam War
by Leslie Mount for the City of Del City 9th Edition, November 2018 View online or leave a comment at www.cityofdelcity.com The Armistice of World War I On a street in Sarajevo on the sunny morning of June 28, 1914, a Serbian nationalist, 19 year old Gavrilo Princip, fired two shots into Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand's car, killing both the heir to the Hapsburg throne and his wife Sophie. The two shots “heard ‘round the world” set in motion the events that led to World War I. A remarkable series of events known as the treaty alliance system led to the scale of “The Great War.” European nations mobilized and declared war on other nations in a tangled web of alliances, some of which dated back to Bismarck and the unification of Germany in the late 1800’s. Europe was divided between the Allied Forces (Britain, France, Russia, the Serbian Kingdom, and later joined by Italy), and the Central Powers (Germany, Austria- Hungary and the Ottoman Empire) Europe entered the war in 1914. On April 6, 1917, the United States declared war on Germany following Germany’s sinking of the neutral British ocean liner the RMS Lusitania that carried mostly passengers, including 159 Americans; and the 1917 Zimmermann Telegram in which Germany sent a coded message to Mexico offering United States’ lands to Mexico in return for Mexico joining World War I against the United States. The First World War was an extremely bloody war that was fought mainly in trenches and employed modern weaponry unlike any that had been used before. -
A Chronology of the UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 1965
MARINE CORPS HISTORICAL REFERENCE PAMPHLE T A Chronology Of The UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 1965-1969 VOLUME I V HISTORICAL DIVISION HEADQUARTERS, U . S. MARINE CORP S WASHINGTON, D. C. 1971 HQMC 08JUNO2 ERRATUM to A CHRONOLOGY OF USMC (SFTBOUND ) 1965-1969 1 . Change the distribution PCN read 19000318100 "vice" 19000250200. DISTRIBUTION: PCN 19000318180 PCN 19000318180 A CHRONOLOGY OF THE UNITED STATE S MARINE -CORPS, 1965-196 9 VOLUME I V B Y GABRIELLE M . NEUFEL D Historical Divisio n Headquarters, United States Marine Corp s Washington, D . C . 20380 197 1 PCN 19000318100 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON . D . C. 20380 Prefac e This is the fourth volume of a chronology of Marin e Corps activities which cover the history of the U . S . Marines . It is derived from unclassified official record s and suitable published contemporary works . This chronology is published for the information o f all interested in Marine Corps activities during the perio d 1965-1969 and is dedicated to those Marines who participate d in the. events listed . J . R . C H Lieute O" General, U . S . Marine Corp s Chief of Staf f Reviewed and approved : 2 September 1971 ABOUT THE AUTHO R Gabrielle M . Neufeld has been a member of the staff o f the Historical Division since January 1969 . At the presen t time she is a historian in the Reference Branch of th e Division . She received her B .A . in history from Mallory College, Rockville Centre, N .Y ., and her M .A . in Easter n history from Georgetown University, Washington, D . -
NPRC) VIP List, 2009
Description of document: National Archives National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) VIP list, 2009 Requested date: December 2007 Released date: March 2008 Posted date: 04-January-2010 Source of document: National Personnel Records Center Military Personnel Records 9700 Page Avenue St. Louis, MO 63132-5100 Note: NPRC staff has compiled a list of prominent persons whose military records files they hold. They call this their VIP Listing. You can ask for a copy of any of these files simply by submitting a Freedom of Information Act request to the address above. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. -
Labadie, Jr. October 8, 1958 – April 7, 2004 SFC – Army
Compiled, designed and edited by Leslie Mount for the City of Del City 6th Edition, November 2015 View online or leave a comment at www.cityofdelcity.com If you have any information about the heroes on these pages, please contact Leslie Mount City of Del City 3701 S.E. 15th Street Del City, OK 73115 (405) 670-7302 [email protected] Billy A. Krowse December 14, 1925 – March 13, 1945 PFC – US Army World War II illy attended the Oklahoma Military ably reorganized the remnants of the unit, and B Academy in Claremore, Oklahoma. He issued orders for a continued assault. Observing had completed a year of college before enlisting a hostile machine gun position holding up fur- in the Army on March 25, 1944, for a term of ther advance, he proceeded alone under fire and the duration of the war plus six months. Billy succeeded in personally eliminating the enemy was proud to serve his country, and his goal was position. While clearing the area around the to attend Officer Candidate School. gun position, he was killed by a hidden enemy rifleman, but his indomitable courage so Billy was posthumously awarded inspired his comrades that they surged forward the Distinguished Service Cross and secured the hill. The consummate for “… extraordinary heroism determination, exemplary leadership, and heroic in connection with military self-sacrifice, clearly displayed by Private operations against an armed Krowse reflect the highest credit upon himself, enemy while serving with the 78th Infantry Division, and the United States Company G, 311th Infantry Army.” [Department of the Army, General Regiment, 78th Infantry Division, Orders No. -
US Offensives VIETNAM
US Offensives (Offensives and Named Campaigns) VIETNAM WAR Source: U.S. Army Center of Military History Advisory 15 March 1962 - 7 March 1965 Defense 08 March 1965 - 24 December 1965 Counteroffensive 25 December 1965 - 30 June 1966 Counteroffensive, Phase II 01 July 1966 - 31 May 1967 Counteroffensive, Phase III 01 June 1967 - 29 January 1968 Tet Counteroffensive 30 January 1968- 01 April 1968 Counteroffensive, Phase IV 02 April 1968 - 30 June 1968 Counteroffensive, Phase V 01 July 1968- 1 November 1968 Counteroffensive, Phase VI 02 November 1968 - 22 February 1969 Tet 69/Counteroffensive 23 February 1969 - 8 June 1969 Summer-Fall 1969 09 June 1969 - 31 October 1969 Winter-Spring 1970 01 November 1969 - 30 April 1970 Sanctuary Counteroffensive 01 May 1970 - 30 June 1970 Counteroffensive, Phase VII 01 July 1970 - 30 June 1971 Consolidation I 01 July 1971 - 30 November 1971 Consolidation II 01 December 1971 - 29 March 1972 Cease-Fire 30 March 1972 - 28 January 1973 Advisory, 15 March 1962 - 07 March 1965 During this period, direct U.S. involvement in the Vietnam conflict increased steadily as U.S. trained Vietnamese pilots moved Vietnamese helicopter units into and out of combat. Ultimately the United States hoped that a strong Vietnamese government would result in improved internal security and national defense. The number of U.S. advisors in the field rose from 746 in January 1962 to over 3,400 by June; the entire U.S. commitment by the end of the year was 11,000, which included 29 U.S. Army Special Forces detachments. These advisory and support elements operated under the Commander, U.S. -
55Th Anniversary of the Vietnam
‘/ 55th Anniversary of the Vietnam War Operations in I-CORPS - OP SWIFT 1967 Go back to see ALL of I-Corps...join us no matter when you were there or if you just read about the heroes who fought in I-Corps throughout the war! LtGen “Lew” Walt presided over the essential expansion of the Marine Corps effort dur- ing the Vietnam War. When he arrived in June 1965, the III Marine Amphibious Force (III MAF) amounted to a collection of battalions posted to a few key points in I-Corps, the tactical zone composed of South Vietnam’s five northernmost provinces. When General Walt left, replaced by LtGen Robert Cushman in June 1967, III MAF was a full corps with both the 1st & 3rd Marine Divisions, the Army’s Americal Division, and the 1st Marine Aircraft Wing, a reinforced air wing fielding more than 500 aircraft and heli- copters plus a host of supporting units. General Walt’s forces were engaged every- where from the coastal zone below the Central Highlands to a stretch of Route 1 the French had named “the Street Without Joy” to the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) separat- ing the two Vietnams. Tour Leader: Ron Dudek has Operation Swift was launched by the 1st & 3rd Battalions, 5th Marines, 1st MarDiv to relief been back to two Marine companies which had been heavily engaged by the NVA & VC. The operation took Vietnam over place in the Quế Sơn Valley, beginning on 4 Sept 1967. Operation Swift, intended to be the 45 times & will fourth and the last of the 1967 operations in the Quế Sơn Valley. -
Fourragèrethe Newsletter of the Vietnam Veterans of the 1St Battalion, 5Th Marines Dition in Honor of Sgt
The FOURRAGÈREThe Newsletter of the Vietnam Veterans of the 1st Battalion, 5th Marines dition In Honor of Sgt. Rodney M. Davis, USMC, MOH l E Specia Volume XII Special Edition The Sgt. Davis Story Continues Early on the morning of 6 “We had a kind of lull in the fighting. During that time, September 1967, Sergeant Sgt. Davis appeared at our position and gave us instructions Rodney M. Davis, from about fire discipline, distributed more ammo, and assigned us Macon, Georgia, earned the fields of fire. He told us we would be moving people around Medal of Honor. He was into better defensive positions shortly, and then moved on to killed in action during one of the many large battles in the next position. I didn’t envy him his task, but I have to say the Que Son Valley dubbed that his visit was hugely reassuring. Sgt. Davis returned to Operation SWIFT. give us the word on the move and we reluctantly left the deep crater we had been in, but favored the new spot over the old Sergeant Davis was married and had two young children. He when we saw that our position had improved dramatically. had been serving as a Marine Security Guard at the American Embassy in London, England, and could have avoided combat Sgt. Davis went off to another position. I thought he appeared in Vietnam altogether because his enlistment was nearly at an visibly shaken by the fury of the attack and the peril of our end. But Rodney had several friends serving in Vietnam and situation, but he had mastered his feelings; his voice was he felt a calling to join the fight. -
This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from the King's Research Portal At
This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Understanding the United States Marines’ strategy and approach to the conventional war in South Vietnam’s Northern provinces, March 1965 – December 1967 Nevgloski, Edward Thomas Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 23. Sep. 2021 UNDERSTANDING THE UNITED STATES MARINES’ STRATEGY AND APPROACH TO THE CONVENTIONAL WAR IN SOUTH VIETNAM’S NORTHERN PROVINCES, MARCH 1965 – DECEMBER 1967 By Student # 1260366 A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy King’s College London, War Studies Group Defence Studies Department June 2019 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. -
The Border Battles of Vietnam the Border Battles of Vietnam by Michael A
Page 134 The Border Battles of Vietnam The Border Battles of Vietnam By Michael A. Eggleston . The fight at Dak To was the third engagement during the fall of 1967 that collectively became known as the "Border Battles." . Dak To was possibly the greatest portent if it was the opening round in "a con- centrated offensive effort" throughout South Vietnam1. General William C. Westmoreland The Border Battles2 1967 brought major fighting to the border areas of South Vietnam. It was an effort by Hanoi to draw U.S. Forces from the densely populated cities of the coastal region to the border areas. This was in preparation for the Tet offensive planned for January 1968 when the cities would be the target of Hanoi’s offensive. The Border Battles would extend from the Demilitarized Zone in the north to the border region north of Saigon in South Vietnam. This required a major commitment of forces by North Vietnam into the border region while the VC would bear the brunt of the fighting in The Border Battles2 the cities during Tet. The Allies would see a new strategy by the NVA. Rather than guerrilla warfare, a conventional war would emerge. Most of the fighting would occur in the Central Highlands of South Vietnam. Dak To fighting started a year before Tet ’68 and would peak in the fall of 1967 after two previous Border Battles. Fighting in the Central Highlands occurred at over a dozen locations, but the most decisive and costly to both sides was at Hill 1338 and Hill 875. -
A Short History of Army Intelligence
A Short History of Army Intelligence by Michael E. Bigelow, Command Historian, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command Introduction On July 1, 2012, the Military Intelligence (MI) Branch turned fi fty years old. When it was established in 1962, it was the Army’s fi rst new branch since the Transportation Corps had been formed twenty years earlier. Today, it remains one of the youngest of the Army’s fi fteen basic branches (only Aviation and Special Forces are newer). Yet, while the MI Branch is a relatively recent addition, intelligence operations and functions in the Army stretch back to the Revolutionary War. This article will trace the development of Army Intelligence since the 18th century. This evolution was marked by a slow, but steady progress in establishing itself as a permanent and essential component of the Army and its operations. Army Intelligence in the Revolutionary War In July 1775, GEN George Washington assumed command of the newly established Continental Army near Boston, Massachusetts. Over the next eight years, he dem- onstrated a keen understanding of the importance of MI. Facing British forces that usually outmatched and often outnumbered his own, Washington needed good intelligence to exploit any weaknesses of his adversary while masking those of his own army. With intelligence so imperative to his army’s success, Washington acted as his own chief of intelligence and personally scrutinized the information that came into his headquarters. To gather information about the enemy, the American com- mander depended on the traditional intelligence sources avail- able in the 18th century: scouts and spies. -
Report on the Situation in Vietnam, 28 February 1968
k Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C06786687 5 I H /%7c;¢:> ' E) \/I . s.5(¢) '1 1: ),"fi I=E‘»?nuv.'.=l1f§‘ ?¢%‘*='K‘=::=i=-' \ in ' ‘:4 ‘=1 ~I¢ 1'-i ia *%“@mW$ ‘"1’ '13:‘ j,"._;' '-‘mm ._ LI _ :1 né-J~ é if £6 Q Q m;¥»§_;§#::"~ 1. nmm.-an-rm. Q, if _-!_ I v 1-‘ €5">-‘_,",. , -1‘ < ~ 'rQN30‘<T $fl% i ~ ‘".»- ?="sf Ni‘-‘122%‘. 54;’ : I"L e '“'§j» §’ / \ ", " ~ P nrzsof _-4 - 2§‘_,*i~;;'§"%= ~’ ,_ _ I 1"'%~‘3 ,5‘ ’ ‘L -2 °'.> " ""': ' . i— » w. - . , . ( » . >*==>- >“ ’\,1§»>‘§?;J_..f;1‘~ _|_‘:,_§f:_\,§.E-W vwfig '&% .,:§§;- -=-,~_v,,5‘:-ii MEMORANDUM \\,§E§,,; A5 E, DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE \ \ The Sittttttion iii Vietnam _- \ 6-“Q. 1 I \ 1 9’ C O2 LLuufl£4%4QMw%++5hnnnfi-- 28 February_l968 l \ 3 \ T Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C06786687 r \ Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C06786687 \ 4 \ A __ l "H po ii? . £555 Slil to . YBackground Use Only \ __,_,_ ' Information as of 1600 ' 28 February 1968 s.5(¢) HIGHLIGHTS Reports from several rural areas indicate that the Viet Cong have almost complete freedom of move- ment there, even in formerly pacified sections. The relative lull in major Communist ground action activ- ity continues, although there are indications of im- pending large—scale activity in several-areas of the ' ' ' country.‘ -_ - ; _ v_ _ I. .Military.Situation in South Vietnam:_ Com- munist.military activity on 27-28 February was high- lighted by continued shelling of allied strongpoints in northern and western Quang Tri Province, and by at- - tacks.in western Kontum Province, and against provin- cial and district capitals in III and IV Corps. -
USNS Shoshone
NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT VESSEL: ex-USS Vancouver (LPD-2) USS Vancouver underway off the coast of Oahu, Hawaii in 1967. U.S. Navy photo by PH3 D.R. Hyder. http://www.navsource.org/archives/10/09/0902.htm Vessel History The amphibious transport dock ship USS Vancouver (LPD-2) was laid down on November 19, 1960 at the New York Naval Shipyard in Brooklyn, New York. It was launched on September 15, 1962, and commissioned on May 11, 1963. Vancouver was the second of three Raleigh-class LPDs; USS La Salle (LPD-3) was the third and last of the class. LPDs are named for cities that honor celebrated pioneers and explorers. Vancouver was named for the town of Vancouver, Washington. George Vancouver (1757-1798), British naval officer and explorer, commanded a British expedition that explored Puget Sound in 1792. After completing builder’s trials off New York n the summer of 1963, Vancouver proceeded to Norfolk, Virginia for shakedown training. On August 14 Vancouver steamed from there to its new homeport of San Diego, California via the Panama Canal. Following a brief stop at Acapulco, Mexico after assisting a disabled fishing vessel, Vancouver arrived in San Diego on 2 August 31. That fall Vancouver conducted amphibious operations and visited its namesake, Vancouver, Washington. In December, Vancouver displayed its capabilities for the new Secretary of the Navy Paul H. Nitze and several high-ranking naval officers. From February to May 1964, Vancouver underwent post-shakedown maintenance and repairs in Long Beach, California. In late June it steamed north to Vancouver, Canada for that city’s annual maritime festival prior to spending the July 4th holiday in San Francisco.