© Copyright Parker Planning Services Ltd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

© Copyright Parker Planning Services Ltd 14 August 2020 Transport Statement for Proposed 15 Pitch Tent Only Camp Site Timescale exceeding existing 28 Day (Currently 56 Day) Allowance within Part 4 of the General Permitted Development Order 2015 Land South of Letheringsett Road , Thornage, Holt Norfolk Office 01603 516319 Suffolk Office 01284 336348 Essex Office 01245 934 184 Orchard House The Northgate Business Centre, Moulsham Mill, Hall Lane 10 Northgate Street, Parkway, East Tuddenham, Bury St Edmunds, Chelmsford Norfolk, NR20 3LR Suffolk, IP33 1HQ Essex, CM2 7PX www.parkerplanningservices.co.uk © Copyright Parker Planning Services Ltd Information Date of Application August 20 20 Site Address Land South of Letheringsett Road, Thornage, Holt Development Use of Land for a Tent Only 15 Pitch Camp Site Description Local Planning North Norfolk District Council Authority Applicant Mr T om Wright Author: Howard Cardus IEng FIHE MA Principal Highways & Transport Consultant Report Revision: 1 www.parkerplanningservices.co.uk © Copyright Parker Planning Services Ltd Transport Statement – Use of Land for 15 Pitch Tent Only Camp Site Land South of Letheringsett Road, Thornage, Holt Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Site Location and Description 3.0 Highways Discussion 4.0 Conclusion Appendix 1 Site Exit Routes Appendix 2 Major Road Network Junctions - Visibility Appraisal Appendix 3 Road Network – Passing Place Appraisal Appendix 4 Appeal Ref: APP/Y2620/W/19/3236740 Page 1 © Copyright Parker Planning Services Ltd www.parkerplanningservices.co.uk Transport Statement – Use of Land for 15 Pitch Tent Only Camp Site Land South of Letheringsett Road, Thornage, Holt 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Parker Planning Services Ltd have been instructed by Mr Tom Wright to investigate highways matters related to a proposed extended time period and continued seasonal usage of his land for a tent only camp site. 1.2 The applicant is proposing to extend his current permitted seasonal opening periods for operating a tent only camp site on his land to in excess of the statutory government allowance of 28 days in total, in any calendar year. Note: Corona Virus Restrictions ceased on 4 th July 2020. Where campsites have reopened in accordance with permitted development rights, the Government has allowed an extension to their statutory allowable opening from a period from 28 days, to 56 days until December 2020, without the need for planning permission. Demand for pitches on the applicant’s land during the summer period of 2020 has been high, with no recorded issues. 1.3 The applicant’s proposal includes imposing a limit on tent only provision for up to a maximum of 15 pitches at any one time, whilst noting the current permitted use on this land offers no upper limit on the numbers of pitches which he provides. With a site size of 2.4 acres and general conditions for campsites legalisation recommending a limit of up to 30 pitches per acre, the onsite capacity for pitches at his camp site location is considerably higher. 1.4 This proposal replaces the applicant’s earlier proposition for a 25 pitch tent only camp site. He decided to withdraw this original proposal based on particular concerns identified to him by Norfolk County Council in relation to highways safety and due to insufficient consideration of highways matters at that time. 1.5 In response, the applicant’s proposition is now based on seeking to continue the running of a more modest camp site on his land by proposing a significantly reduced maximum usage managed over an extended seasonal period in order that he can to continue to operate his site as a viable rural business. 1.6 Concern regarding the capability of the surrounding road network to accommodate additional traffic generated from a potential time unlimited camp site business offering 25 pitches was raised by Norfolk County Council, in its capacity as local highway authority, in October 2019. Page 2 © Copyright Parker Planning Services Ltd www.parkerplanningservices.co.uk Transport Statement – Use of Land for 15 Pitch Tent Only Camp Site Land South of Letheringsett Road, Thornage, Holt 1.7 Norfolk County Council provided comments regarding their highway safety concerns due to the location of the site some 1.5 miles away from the nearest main road, the A148 Holt Road with access into the site gained from the narrow and sinuous unclassified road, namely Thornage/Letheringsett Road, which is unlit and subject to the national speed limit. 1.8 Their comments continued by stating visibility at the site’s access is acceptable, however given the need to access the A148 to gain access to the wider road network, visibility considerations are also paramount along the route and in particular at the A148 separated heater island junction. Other routes are available to connect with the B1110 Thornage Road and onto the wider road network; however these routes are limited with single track rural roads which are considered to be unsuitable for the proposed increased use. 1.9 Consequently, highways considerations in relation to the applicant’s revised proposals include a detailed review of most likely and accessible routes to and from the application site plus a review of all passing place provisions and all associated junction visibility where users of the camp site will now emerge onto the principle road network. 1.10 In addition, a review of the site’s overall functions and associated on site operations will be provided based on its geographical location. This will ascertain whether any reduced or mitigated impacts on the highway network could be incorporated as part of the applicant’s proposals. 1.11 This report has been compiled by Howard Cardus, a Fellow of the Institute of Highways Engineers (FIHE), with experience in highways development control exceeding 30 years; including service as a local highway authority development control officer and representing the local highway authority as an expert witness. Page 3 © Copyright Parker Planning Services Ltd www.parkerplanningservices.co.uk Transport Statement – Use of Land for 15 Pitch Tent Only Camp Site Land South of Letheringsett Road, Thornage, Holt 2.0 Site Location and Description 2.1 The site is located approximately half a mile north of Thornage village centre. Thornage is located to the south west of Holt, approximately 3.0 miles away. 2.2 Surrounding villages also include Letheringsett to the north, Brinton and Sharrington to the west, Stody to the south and Hunworth to the south east. The nearest city of Norwich is located 25 miles away. 2.3 Thornage is located approximately 5 miles south of the popular North Norfolk Coastline. The nearest coastal village of Blakeney is located approximately 6 miles away. 2.4 The surrounding principle road network in proximity to the site comprises the A148 to the north and B1110 located to the south. Each of these roads run in a north easterly direction. 2.5 The site itself is accessed via the U14267 Thornage/Letheringsett Road which is classified as a 4A2 remaining link road. It is of single carriageway width with varying forms of passing places forming part of its identity as the secondary route network serving local traffic. SITE Figure 1 – Site Location 2.6 A 60 mph national speed limit exists in proximity of the application site. 2.7 On the same road, the nearby villages of Thornage to the south and Little Thornage to the north are subject to 30 mph speed limits. Page 4 © Copyright Parker Planning Services Ltd www.parkerplanningservices.co.uk Transport Statement – Use of Land for 15 Pitch Tent Only Camp Site Land South of Letheringsett Road, Thornage, Holt 2.8 A review of available accident data for the past 10 years, published by the Department for Transport, dating between 2009 and 2019, confirms 1 slight injury traffic accident recorded in 2013 in the immediate proximity of the existing site, (Ref. CrashMap). Further to the north at the above-mentioned A148junction in Letheringsett, the separated heater island junction, a number of accidents comprising 1 no. serious accident were recorded. Figure 2 – 10 Year Accident History Data Page 5 © Copyright Parker Planning Services Ltd www.parkerplanningservices.co.uk Transport Statement – Use of Land for 15 Pitch Tent Only Camp Site Land South of Letheringsett Road, Thornage, Holt 3.0 Highways Discussion Access Routes 3.1 Access to the site is achievable via a number of routes for visitors either arriving via the A148 located to the north or the B1110 located in Thornage village to the south. 3.2 The drawing in Appendix 1 further identifies the most likely and available routes to the site from the primary road network. 3.3 Whilst the surrounding secondary road network in proximity of the site is regarded as having a single lane carriageway width, further detailed analysis of the routes recorded from site visits identify a considerable number of passing places located throughout this road network. 3.4 Further, as part of this application the applicant’s site entrance will be enhanced to provide improved passing place provision for all road users within the public highway. 3.5 The passing places recorded on the drawing in Appendix 1 reflect carriageway areas either consisting of suitable widths of or in excess of 4.1 metres or where verge over run areas exist. The verge over run areas recorded show evidence of regular usage and have allowed the road network to function with its current traffic usage incorporating minimal recorded accidents over the past 10 years. 3.6 The characteristics of this type of public highway require the average user to drive more cautiously and at less speed. It is not uncommon for camps sites to exist in such rural areas with restricted carriageway provision. In which case camp site operators provide appropriate information at the time of booking to adopt the same driving manner.
Recommended publications
  • River Glaven State of the Environment Report
    The River Glaven A State of the Environment Report ©Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative ©Evelyn Simak and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence Commons Licence © Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this C reative ©Oliver Dixon and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence Commons Licence Produced by Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service Spring 201 4 i Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service (NBIS) is a Local Record Centre holding information on species, GEODIVERSITY , habitats and protected sites for the county of Norfolk. For more information see our website: www.nbis.org.uk This report is available for download from the NBIS website www.nbis.org.uk Report written by Lizzy Oddy, March 2014. Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank the following people for their help and input into this report: Mark Andrews (Environment Agency); Anj Beckham (Norfolk County Council Historic Environment Service); Andrew Cannon (Natural Surroundings); Claire Humphries (Environment Agency); Tim Jacklin (Wild Trout Trust); Kelly Powell (Norfolk County Council Historic Environment Service); Carl Sayer (University College London); Ian Shepherd (River Glaven Conservation Group); Mike Sutton-Croft (Norfolk Non-native Species Initiative); Jonah Tosney (Norfolk Rivers Trust) Cover Photos Clockwise from top left: Wiveton Bridge (©Evelyn Simak and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); Glandford Ford (©Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); River Glaven above Glandford (©Oliver Dixon and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); Swan at Glandford Ford (© Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence). ii CONTENTS Foreword – Gemma Clark, 9 Chalk Rivers Project Community Involvement Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code
    Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham
    [Show full text]
  • County Town Title Film/Fiche # Item # Norfolk Benefices, List Of
    County Town Title Film/Fiche # Item # Norfolk Benefices, List of 1471412 It 44 Norfolk Census 1851 Index 6115160 Norfolk Church Records 1725-1812 1526807 It 1 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1811-1825 375230 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1825-1839 375231 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1839-1859 375232 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1715-1734 1596461 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1734-1749 1596462 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1770-1774 1596563 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1774-1781 1596564 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1790-1797 1596566 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1798-1803 1596567 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1812-1819 1596597 Norfolk Marriages Parish Registers 1539-1812 496683 It 2 Norfolk Probate Inventories Index 1674-1825 1471414 It 17-20 Norfolk Tax Assessments 1692-1806 1471412 It 30-43 Norfolk Wills V.101 1854-1857 167184 Norfolk Alburgh Parish Register Extracts 1538-1715 894712 It 5 Norfolk Alby Parish Records 1600-1812 1526778 It 15 Norfolk Aldeby Church Records 1725-1812 1526786 It 6 Norfolk Alethorpe Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Arminghall Census 1841 438862 Norfolk Ashby Church Records 1725-1812 1526786 It 7 Norfolk Ashby Parish Register Extracts 1646 894712 It 5 Norfolk Ashwell-Thorpe Census 1841 438851 Norfolk Aslacton Census 1841 438851 Norfolk Baconsthorpe Parish Register Extracts 1676-1770 894712 It 6 Norfolk Bagthorpe Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Bale Census 1841 438862 Norfolk Bale Parish Register Extracts 1538-1716 894712 It 6 Norfolk Barmer Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Barney Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Barton-Bendish Church Records 1725-1812 1526807 It
    [Show full text]
  • The Cromer Moraine
    THE CROMER MORAINE - A STUDY OF ITS PROGRESSIVE RECLAMATION ELIZABETH LANGTON ProQuest Number: 10097240 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10097240 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ilBSTRAGT The Cromer Moraine forms a distinctive geographical region near the coast of the northern part of the County of Norfolk. A pro­ nounced characteristic of this region is the vridespread cover of heatb-land, far less extensive than in former times. This heathland appears in its turn to have developed from an original woodland cover which was destroyed by the depredations of man and his domesticated animals . It has been necessary first to delimit the region as accurately as possible and this has been accomplished by means of a detailed study of local topography and of well-sections. The earliest evidence of the location of heathland comes from tlie Domesday Survey and this has been confirmed by references to heathland in various other documents dovm to 1750. By the middle of the eighteenth century the new developments in agriculture^ or ’Norfolk Husbandry’ as it was called, became widely known and practised, resulting in this region in a greatly accelerated reclama­ tion of heathland; so that by the time of the Tithe Survey (183S-42) less than a hundred years later over 4000 acres of heath had been reclaimed.
    [Show full text]
  • North Norfolk District Council (Alby
    DEFINITIVE STATEMENT OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY NORTH NORFOLK DISTRICT VOLUME I PARISH OF ALBY WITH THWAITE Footpath No. 1 (Middle Hill to Aldborough Mill). Starts from Middle Hill and runs north westwards to Aldborough Hill at parish boundary where it joins Footpath No. 12 of Aldborough. Footpath No. 2 (Alby Hill to All Saints' Church). Starts from Alby Hill and runs southwards to enter road opposite All Saints' Church. Footpath No. 3 (Dovehouse Lane to Footpath 13). Starts from Alby Hill and runs northwards, then turning eastwards, crosses Footpath No. 5 then again northwards, and continuing north-eastwards to field gate. Path continues from field gate in a south- easterly direction crossing the end Footpath No. 4 and U14440 continuing until it meets Footpath No.13 at TG 20567/34065. Footpath No. 4 (Park Farm to Sunday School). Starts from Park Farm and runs south westwards to Footpath No. 3 and U14440. Footpath No. 5 (Pack Lane). Starts from the C288 at TG 20237/33581 going in a northerly direction parallel and to the eastern boundary of the cemetery for a distance of approximately 11 metres to TG 20236/33589. Continuing in a westerly direction following the existing path for approximately 34 metres to TG 20201/33589 at the western boundary of the cemetery. Continuing in a generally northerly direction parallel to the western boundary of the cemetery for approximately 23 metres to the field boundary at TG 20206/33611. Continuing in a westerly direction parallel to and to the northern side of the field boundary for a distance of approximately 153 metres to exit onto the U440 road at TG 20054/33633.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT of PERSONS NOMINATED Election of Parish
    STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED North Norfolk Election of Parish Councillors The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a Councillor for Aldborough and Thurgarton Reason why Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer no longer nominated* BAILLIE The Bays, Chapel Murat Anne M Tony Road, Thurgarton, Norwich, NR11 7NP ELLIOTT Sunholme, The Elliott Ruth Paul Martin Green, Aldborough, NR11 7AA GALLANT Spring Cottage, The Elliott Paul M David Peter Green, Aldborough, NR11 7AA WHEELER 4 Pipits Meadow, Grieves John B Jean Elizabeth Aldborough, NR11 7NW WORDINGHAM Two Oaks, Freeman James H J Peter Thurgarton Road, Aldborough, NR11 7NY *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated. The persons above against whose name no entry is made in the last column have been and stand validly nominated. Dated: Friday 10 April 2015 Sheila Oxtoby Returning Officer Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Electoral Services, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, Norfolk, NR27 9EN STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED North Norfolk Election of Parish Councillors The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a Councillor for Antingham Reason why Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer no longer nominated* EVERSON Margra, Southrepps Long Trevor F Graham Fredrick Road, Antingham, North Walsham, NR28 0NP JONES The Old Coach Independent Bacon Robert H Graham House, Antingham Hall, Cromer Road, Antingham, N. Walsham, NR28 0NJ LONG The Old Forge, Everson Graham F Trevor Francis Elderton Lane, Antingham, North Walsham, NR28 0NR LOVE Holly Cottage, McLeod Lynn W Steven Paul Antingham Hill, North Walsham, Norfolk, NR28 0NH PARAMOR Field View, Long Trevor F Stuart John Southrepps Road, Antingham, North Walsham, NR28 0NP *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GLAVEN RIVER CATCHMENT Links Between Geodiversity and Landscape
    THE GLAVEN RIVER CATCHMENT Links between geodiversity and landscape - A resource for educational and outreach work - Tim Holt-Wilson Norfolk Geodiversity Partnership CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Landscape Portrait 3.0 Features to visit 4.0 Local Details 5.0 Resources 1.0 INTRODUCTION The River Glaven is partly a chalk river, of which there are more in England than any other country in the world. Chalk rivers are fed from groundwater sources in chalk bedrock, producing clear waters. Many of them have ‘winterbourne’ stretches in their headwaters, with intermittent or absent flow in summer. They have characteristic plant communities, and their gravelly beds, clear waters and rich invertebrate life support important populations of brown trout, salmon and other fish. The Stiffkey is a notable example of a chalk river in north Norfolk, and is classified as one between Edgefield Bridge (TG085363) and Glandford Bridge (TG045415). This report explains the links between geodiversity and the biological and cultural character of the river catchment. It provides a digest of information for education and interpretive outreach about this precious natural resource. Some specialist words are marked in blue and appear in the Glossary (section 5). 2.0 LANDSCAPE PORTRAIT 2.1 Topography and geology The River Glaven is a river in north Norfolk with a length of 17 km (11 miles). Its catchment drains an area of some 115 sq km, with its headwaters in the uplands of the Cromer Ridge. It is fed by several tributaries, including the Thornage Beck and Water Lane Beck, among other spring-fed sources; there are no tributaries in the lower reaches where it flows directly over chalk bedrock.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Government Boundary Commission for England Electoral Review of North Norfolk
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF NORTH NORFOLK Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the district of North Norfolk April 2017 Sheet 1 of 1 This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2017. Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information applied as part of this review. KEY TO PARISH WARDS CROMER CP WELLS-NEXT-THE-SEA CP A SUFFIELD PARK STIFFKEY CP MORSTON CP B TOWN BLAKENEY CP SALTHOUSE WARHAM CP CP SHERI COASTAL CLEY NEXT NGHAM NORTH J WELLS WITH HOLKHAM THE SEA CP FAKENHAM CP SHERINGHAM C NORTH CP BEESTON REGIS D SOUTH HOLKHAM CP WIVETON WEYBOURNE CP SHERINGHAM & THE RUNTONS CP K BEESTON KELLING CP SOUTH REGIS CP RUNTON CP CROMER TOWN SUFFIELD NORTH WALSHAM CP UPPER SHERINGHAM CP PARK CROMER LANGHAM CP B CP E EAST A F NORTH OVERSTRAND CP G TOWN CENTRE EAST H TOWN CENTRE WEST BINHAM CP LETHERINGSETT HIGH EAST WITH KELLING BECKHAM CP I WEST WIGHTON CP GLANDFORD CP CP AYLMERTON CP PRIORY SIDESTRAND BODHAM CP WEST POPPYLAND BECKHAM FELBRIGG CP CP SHERINGHAM CP CP HOLT NORTHREPPS CP J NORTH HOLT CP FIELD DALLING CP TRIMINGHAM K SOUTH CP GRESHAM CP WALSINGHAM CP ROUGHTON CP GRESHAM BACONSTHORPE SUSTEAD CP
    [Show full text]
  • The Guardians of the Erpingham Poor Law Union Ordered by Parish
    22/11/2013 The Guardians of the Erpingham Poor Law Union Ordered by Parish Name Representing First appearance Occupation DOB Rough Notes Shuckburgh, Reverend Robert Alborough 3 May 1836 Cleric 1809 Ordained 1828 (MA Trinity Oxford 1828) & was initially Curate of Otterborne (Hants). Appointed to Alborough in 1832. Married Elizabeth Lyford 7 Jul 1834. Had 12 children. Died 1860. Helsdon, John Alborough 8 Apr 1839 Farmer 1778 Born at Suffield. Wife Mary. In 1851 he was at the Old Hall, Aldborough, farming 80 acres with 2 labourers. Dolphin, Reverend John Antingham 12 April 1836 Cleric & JP 1805 Born at Lower Slaughter, Gloucestershire. Appointed 1830 to Antingham with Thorpe Market. Married Mary Western 1833. Died 1889. Coleman, John Antingham 3 April 1837 Farmer 1786 Born at Bergh Apton. Wife Elizabeth (Betsy). At Rockland St. Mary in 1851 and Framingham Pigot (widowed) in 1861. Barcham, Jedidiah Antingham 27 Oct 1845 Farmer 1785 Born at Edingthorpe. 1841 - Antingham, farmer. 1851 - White Horse Common, North Walsham. Farmer of 150 acres, employing 7 men. Wife Susan born at Stalham. Died 1858. Carter, James Antingham 30 Apr 1849 Farmer 1806 Born at Northrepps. 1851 - Farmer of 428 acres employing 16 labourers. Unmarried. Living with his widowed sister Elizabeth. Daniel(l)(s), Edward Aylmerton 12 April 1836 Farmer 1810 Born at Norwich. "Daniell" in 1841 Census. In 1851 he was farming 360 acres and employed 12 men. Died 1896 at Norwich. Woods, Robert Aylmerton 9 Apr 1838 Farmer 1779 Born at Erpingham. Wife Hannah b. Erpingham 1785. 1841 - Aylmerton. Had moved to Thurgarton by early 1844, where he became a Guardian.
    [Show full text]
  • The Norfolk County Council
    NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL (CLEY NEXT THE SEA) (EMERGENCY NOTICE) TEMPORARY TRAFFIC RESTRICTION 2019 Road Traffic Regulation Act, 1984 – Section 14(2) In accordance with the provisions of Section 14(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act, 1984, the Norfolk County Council HEREBY GIVE NOTICE that owing to emergency water repairs the use by vehicles of the A149 High Street from a point 350m northeast of its junction with C306 Holt Road heading northeast for 50m in the PARISH OF CLEY NEXT THE SEA will be temporarily prohibited from 24th June 2019 to 28th June 2019 for the duration of the works, expected to be about 5 days within the period. If necessary the restriction could run for a maximum period of 21 days. Alternative route is via: Coast Road, Coast Road Service Road, Salthouse Footpath 17, Salthouse Road, Weybourne Road, Kelling Road, The Street, Sheringham Road, Cromer Road, Holway Road, Holt Road, Holt Bypass, Norwich Road, Link Footpath To Norwich Road Subway, Letheringsett Hill, Fakenham Road, Brinton Road, Smokers Hole, Langham Road, New Road, Cley-next-the-sea Footpath 4, High Street (Bodham/ Field Dalling/ Langham/ High Kelling/ West Beckham/ Blakeney/ Holt/ Upper Sheringham/ Weybourne/ Salthouse/ Morston/ Cley Next the Sea/ Sheringham/ Wiveton/ Kelling/ Brinton/ Thornage/ Letheringsett with Glandford). (If necessary the restriction could run for a maximum period of 18 months from the date of the Order) Penalty: £1000 maximum fine on conviction and/or endorsement for contravention. The person dealing with enquiries at Norfolk County Council is Martin Dixon (Community and Environmental Services Department) Telephone 0344 800 8020.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 5.1.12.3 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(Q)
    Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Consultation Report Appendix 12.3 Scoping area and PCZ mailing area map Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 5.1.12.3 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(q) Date: June 2019 Revision: Version 1 Author: Copper Consultancy Photo: Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm This page is intentionally blank. Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendices 585000 590000 595000 600000 605000 610000 615000 620000 625000 630000 635000 640000 Thornage Mundesley Indicative Onshore Elements of Brinton Hunworth Thorpe Market theSouth Project Creake (incl. Landfall, CableHoughton Hanworth St Giles Gunthorpe Stody Relay Station Zones, and Project Plumstead Matlaske Thurgarton Trunch F Great Snoring 335000 East Barsham Briningham Edgefield Alby Hill Knapton 335000 Substation Zone) Thursford West Barsham Little Bacton Ramsgate Barningham Wickmere Primary Consultation Zone Briston Antingham Little Swanton Street Suffield Snoring Novers Swafield Historic Scoping SculthorpeArea Barney Calthorpe Parish Boundaries (OS, 2017) Kettlestone Fulmodeston Itteringham Saxthorpe North Walsham Dunton Tattersett Fakenham Corpusty Crostwight 330000 330000 Hindolveston Thurning Hempton Happisburgh Common Oulton Tatterford Little Stibbard Lessingham Ryburgh Wood Norton Honing East Toftrees Great Ryburgh Heydon Bengate Ruston Guestwick Wood Dalling Tuttington Colkirk Westwick Helhoughton Aylsham Ingham Guist Burgh Skeyton Worstead Stalham next Aylsham East Raynham Oxwick Foulsham Dilham Brampton Stalham Green 325000 325000 Marsham Low Street Hickling
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Agency
    Case study 5. River Glaven, North Norfolk Authors: Mark Wilkinson, Steve Addy (James Hutton Institute), Hannah Clilverd, Carl Sayer, Julian Thompson, Jan Axmacher (University College London), Kate Heppell (Queen Mary University London), Rob Dryden (Environment Agency) Main driver: Improve river corridor habitat and reconnect river and floodplain Project stage: Constructed, sections of river and floodplain are restored (works conducted 2009 to 2010) Photo 1: Embankment removal work in progress, 2009 (source: Clilverd 2016) Project summary: The River Glaven in north Norfolk (Map 1) has been historically modified, for example, through the creation of water mills. Coupled with this, widespread dredging has occurred and flood embankments have been created to protect agricultural land. The project's objectives were to improve the river corridor habitat by restoring river processes and reconnect the river and its floodplain and to develop an experience base that would serve the River Glaven Conservation Group (RGCG) well on other projects. The project provides a unique opportunity to monitor and model river and floodplain interactions. Key facts: A MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 coupled hydrological/hydraulic model was employed to assess the impact of floodplain reconnection. Using data from 2007 to 2010, the study found that the removal of the embankment permitted widespread inundation of the floodplain at high flows (>1.7m3s-1) as well as enhancing flooding of the immediate riparian area during lower magnitude events. Removal of embankments has found to have reduced the channel capacity by approximately 60%, suggesting that overbank flooding was the most dramatic hydrological effect following the restoration project (Clilverd et al. 2013).
    [Show full text]