DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Meeting #2 Summary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Meeting #2 Summary Report Public Meeting #2 Summary Report Metrolinx GO Expansion Program 04-Nov-2020 Prepared by: Revision 00 04-Nov-2020 Metrolinx GO Expansion Program Public Meeting #2 Summary Report Authorization X X Sabriya Jahangir Yulia Pak Environmental Planner Consultation Specialist X X Amber Saltarelli Andrew Gillespie Environmental Lead Program Manager REVISION HISTORY Revision Date Purpose of Submittal Comments 00 04-Nov-20 Final Submission to Metrolinx. N/A This submission was completed and reviewed in accordance with the Quality Assurance Process for this Project. Revision 00 04-Nov-2020 Metrolinx GO Expansion Program Public Meeting #2 Summary Report Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 GO Expansion .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Scope of the GO Expansion Program .............................................................................................. 2 GO Rail Network Electrification TPAP Addendum Project .................................................... 2 Scarborough Junction Grade Separation TPAP .................................................................... 4 Stouffville Rail Corridor Grade Separations TPAP ................................................................ 4 New Track & Facilities TPAP ................................................................................................. 5 Network-Wide Structures Project .......................................................................................... 5 Vegetation Removal and Compensation Program ................................................................ 5 1.3 Report Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.4 Feedback Received from Public Meeting #1 .................................................................................... 6 2 Public Consultation Round Two Overview ........................................................................................... 8 2.1 Consultation Format ......................................................................................................................... 9 COVID-19 .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Notifications ...................................................................................................................................... 9 E-Mail/Letter Correspondence ............................................................................................... 9 Potentially Impacted Property Owners ......................................................................... 10 Participants from Public Meeting #1 ............................................................................. 10 Metrolinx Regional Newsletter ...................................................................................... 10 Review Agencies and Municipalities ............................................................................ 10 Elected Officials ........................................................................................................... 10 Indigenous Communities .............................................................................................. 11 Social Media Postings ......................................................................................................... 11 Metrolinx Website Postings ................................................................................................. 11 GO Expansion Webpage ..................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Project Websites and Materials ...................................................................................................... 12 GO Expansion Program Landing Page ............................................................................... 12 TPAP-Specific Websites ...................................................................................................... 12 About Page .................................................................................................................. 13 Proposed Infrastructure Page ...................................................................................... 13 Revision 00 04-Nov-2020 Metrolinx GO Expansion Program Public Meeting #2 Summary Report Studies Page ................................................................................................................ 13 Your Feedback Page.................................................................................................... 13 Important Documents Page.......................................................................................... 14 Addendum-Specific Websites.............................................................................................. 18 2.4 How to Participate and Provide Feedback ..................................................................................... 19 2.5 Engagement Analytics ................................................................................................................... 20 Metrolinx Engage Website Analytics ................................................................................... 20 Social Media Analytics......................................................................................................... 22 Other E-mails and Voicemail ............................................................................................... 22 3 Summary of Public Feedback ............................................................................................................ 23 3.1 Overall Feedback About the GO Expansion Program .................................................................... 23 3.2 Project-Specific Feedback.............................................................................................................. 24 New Track & Facilities ......................................................................................................... 24 Scarborough Junction Grade Separation ............................................................................ 24 Stouffville Rail Corridor Grade Separations ......................................................................... 25 Network-Wide Structures Project ........................................................................................ 25 GO Rail Network Electrification Addendum ......................................................................... 25 3.3 Other Feedback ............................................................................................................................. 26 4 How Feedback Will be Considered by Metrolinx ............................................................................... 27 5 Next Steps ......................................................................................................................................... 28 Revision 00 04-Nov-2020 Metrolinx GO Expansion Program Public Meeting #2 Summary Report Tables Table 1-1 STOUFFVILLE CORRIDOR PREFFERED GRADE SEPARATION DESIGNS ......................... 4 Table 2-1 METROLINX ENGAGE WEBSITE ANALYTICS ...................................................................... 21 Figures Figure 1-1 MAP OF GO EXPANSION PROGRAM PROJECTS ................................................................. 3 Figure 2-1 GO EXPANSION PROGRAM CONSULTATION TIMELINE ..................................................... 8 Figure 2-2 VISION HUB HEADER ON METROLINX WEBSITE .............................................................. 11 Figure 2-3 GO EXPANSION PROGRAM WEBPAGE .............................................................................. 12 Figure 2-4 SCREEN SHOT OF NEW TRACK & FACILITIES- ABOUT PAGE ......................................... 14 Figure 2-5 SCREENSHOT OF SCARBOROUGH JUNCTION GRADE SEPARATION STUDIES PAGE 16 Figure 2-6 SCREENSHOT OF STOUFFVILLE RAIL CORRIDOR GRADE SEPARATIONS- IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS PAGE ......................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 2-7 SCREENSHOT OF A FEEDBACK FORM .............................................................................. 19 Figure 2-8 SCREENSHOT OF AN ASK-A-QUESTION PAGE ................................................................. 20 Revision 00 04-Nov-2020 Metrolinx GO Expansion Program Public Meeting #2 Summary Report Appendices APPENDIX A: Virtual Public Meeting Notifications APPENDIX A1: Government Review Team Sample Letter and E-mail APPENDIX A2: Indigenous Communities Letters and E-mails APPENDIX A3: Sample Property Owners Letters APPENDIX B: Virtual Public Meeting Materials APPENDIX C: Master Contact List APPENDIX D: Virtual Public Consultation Feedback Forms Revision 00 04-Nov-2020 Metrolinx GO Expansion Program Public Meeting #2 Summary Report 1 Introduction Metrolinx has identified various infrastructure requirements that are needed to achieve planned service level targets across the rail network to support the GO Expansion program. Metrolinx is proposing new infrastructure that involves carrying out three (3) Transit Project Assessment Processes (TPAPs) as prescribed in Ontario Regulation 231/08, Transit Projects and Metrolinx Undertakings (the Transit Projects
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Great Western Zone : TOC Consultation 04
    Network Rail EAS - Section 7 Data freeze: EAS_V4_3_2021 HS1 Route Version 4.3 Week 37 Possession RefLOR Possession Possession Blocked Line Protection Start End Traffic Remarks Work Type Location from Location to Type P2020/2940044 SO110 Fawkham Jn Hook Green Up Waterloo BLOCKED To 15/12/20 15/12/20 W2020/6797756 SO400 Connection A/C Electric 0055 Tue 0510 Tue (4 hrs) OHL Work SO460 Down Waterloo Trains 0m0ch and 0m0ch Connection P2020/2955463 SO110 Fawkham Jn Hook Green Up Waterloo BLOCKED To 16/12/20 16/12/20 W2020/7295972 SO400 Connection A/C Electric 0055 Wed 0510 Wed (4 hrs) OHL Work SO460 Down Waterloo Trains 0m0ch and 0m0ch Connection P2020/2940121 SO110 Fawkham Jn Hook Green Up Waterloo BLOCKED To 17/12/20 17/12/20 W2020/6797817 SO400 Connection A/C Electric 0055 Thu 0510 Thu (4 hrs) OHL Work SO460 Down Waterloo Trains 0m0ch and 0m0ch Connection P2020/2939962 EA1320 St. Pancras Dock Jn South Maintenance Sidings 14/12/20 14/12/20 W2020/7258524 LN115 International Siding Possession 0025 Mon 0440 Mon (5 hrs) S&T Work LN3201 0m0ch and 0m0ch SO400 Silo Curve Jn Cedar Jn Silo Curve Protected 14/12/20 14/12/20 Path 0025 Mon 0440 Mon (4 hrs) St. Pancras York Way North Jn East Coast Protected 14/12/20 14/12/20 International Mainline Path 0025 Mon 0440 Mon (4 hrs) Connection York Way North St. Pancras North London Protected 14/12/20 14/12/20 Jn International Incline Path 0025 Mon 0440 Mon (4 hrs) SUPERSEDED BY CPPP Electronic Copy - Uncontrolled when printed Page1 of 143 Network Rail EAS - Section 7 Data freeze: EAS_V4_3_2021 HS1 Route Version
    [Show full text]
  • Data Classification – Track & Civil
    Division / Business Unit: Corporate Services & Safety Function: Engineering (Track & Civil) Document Type: Work Instruction Data Classification – Track & Civil EGW-10-04 Applicability ARTC Network Wide SMS Publication Requirement Internal / External Primary Source EGH-10-03 Data Management Guideline No. 3 – Track & Civil Equipment Document Status Version Date Prepared by Reviewed by Endorsed Approved # Reviewed 1.1 08 Sep 20 Assurance Engineer & Stakeholders Manager General Manager Level Crossing Standards Technical Standards Performance Manager 16/09/2020 (Interstate Network) Amendment Record Amendment Date Clause Description of Amendment Version # Reviewed 1.0 27 Feb 19 First issue of Work Instruction 1.1 08 Sep 20 Revision to level crossings including licences EGI and functions descriptions table; Inclusion of Track EGI TR0005 - Track Loops; Adjusted size definition for T&C small culverts undertrack; Added enhanced definition with regards to KM change anomalies; And, detailed method to define gauge variations on track equipment in areas where there are many different tracks with different gauge variations in close proximity. Nameplate details also removed from this document and are now defined in a standalone document EGW- 10-17. © Australian Rail Track Corporation Limited (ARTC) Disclaimer This document has been prepared by ARTC for internal use and may not be relied on by any other party without ARTC’s prior written consent. Use of this document shall be subject to the terms of the relevant contract with ARTC. ARTC and its employees shall have no liability to unauthorised users of the information for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of an unauthorised user using or relying upon the information in this document, whether caused by error, negligence, omission or misrepresentation in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • ESC 250 Turnouts and Special Trackwork
    Technical Note – TN 003: 2018 For queries regarding this document [email protected] www.transport.nsw.gov.au Technical Note – TN 003: 2018 Issue date: 23 August 2018 Effective date: 23 August 2018 Subject: Turnout speeds and crossing selection This technical note is issued by the Asset Standards Authority (ASA) as an update to ESC 250 Turnouts and Special Trackwork, version 4.8 to restrict the design speed through higher speed turnouts and crossovers, provide restrictions on the use of certain crossing types and correct some typographical errors. Higher speed turnouts, when used in a crossover or a reversing curve situation without transitions, can result in higher maintenance requirements and increased passenger discomfort. Swing nose and spring wing crossings are permitted to be used with tangential turnouts, but due to whole-of-life costs considerations, restrictions on their use have been expanded. The updates include amendments to Section 6.1.5 as follows: 1. Section 6.1.5 Crossings Replace the contents of Section 6.1.5 with the following: The selection of turnouts is dependent upon the criteria for crossing rates and crossing types. For crossing rate see Section 6.1.5.1 and for crossing type see Section 6.1.5.2. 1.1. Section 6.1.5.1 Selection of crossing rate The selection of the crossing rate shall be based on the geometric design of the turnout and the associated limiting speeds of the mainline and turnout roads. Turnout speeds shall be determined by applying design standards for track geometry detailed in ESC 210 Track Geometry and Stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of High Speed Trains in India and Its Comparative Study with Japan, France, Germany and South Korea
    IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 12, Issue 5 Ver. III (Sep. - Oct. 2015), PP 19-23 www.iosrjournals.org Future of High Speed Trains in India and Its Comparative Study with Japan, France, Germany and South Korea. Shubham Sharma1, Annu2 1Student , Department of Civil Engineering, Maharishi Markandeshwar University,Ambala, Haryana, India.. 2Asisstant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Maharishi Markandeshwar University,Ambala, Haryana, India.. Abstract: India’s population has skyrocketed to about 122 crores .In such a scenario a high speed train technology for a swift transportation of the ever-increasing population is required .Not only speed is the sole aim but passenger safety, comfort and punctuality in railways is the need of the hour. Indian railways are subjected to regular delays in their railway setup. This comparative study focuses on various already existing high speed train technologies across four major countries of Japan, France , Germany and South Korea. The break-through was made by Japan by introducing Shinkansen (Bullet Trains) followed by the French Train Grande Vitesse. Germany and South Korea too followed the French by introducing Inter City Express and Korea Train Express respectively. Since the development of high-speed train technology in India is still in the beginning phase, the study also analyses its future in India. The study is also based on the existing setup and technology of Indian railways and gives some recommendations. Key Words: High Speed Train, Inter City Express, Korea Train Express, Shinkansen , Train Grande Vitesse I. Introduction High speed rail transport is a type of rail transport that runs faster than the conventional railway systems in a country.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Regional Network Operations And
    Country Regional Network – Operations and Maintenance Deed – Exhibit A NOTE TO READER Country Rail Infrastructure Authority (CRIA) notes that the attached document (together with any attachments, schedules, appendices or exhibits etc to that document) (the Document) is provided in accordance with CRIA's obligations under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW). Certain provisions and other information have been excluded from the Document in accordance with that Act. CRIA further notes that the Document may include information which is out of date, incomplete or incorrect. CRIA does not: • assume any responsibility or duty of care in respect of, or • warrant, guarantee or make any representation as to, the information in the Document (including its currency, completeness or accuracy). NSW Country Regional Network Scope of Work and Technical Criteria Contents 1 GENERAL 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Objectives 1 1.3 Scope of Work 1 2 PROJECT AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT 2 2.1 Contractor’s Organisation Structure 2 2.2 Management of the Delivery of Services 2 2.3 Work Breakdown Structure 2 2.4 Business Risk and Issues Management Activities 2 2.5 Implementation of Business Management Systems 3 2.6 Development, Maintenance and Implementation of Management Plans 5 2.7 Documents and Information Deliverables 6 2.8 Document Management and Control 6 2.9 Data Records 6 2.10 Revenue Collection Management 6 2.11 Financial Management 7 2.12 Contract Management 8 2.13 Provision of Reciprocal Support to Enable Effective O&M Deed Management by CRIA 9
    [Show full text]
  • Bullet Trains
    Rakesh Kumar Rousan is a civil servant of 2001 batch with rich experience in the field of Transport Planning and Management. He has done Post Graduation in science from India’s Premier Research Institute and has also done MBA in Operations Management. He has been trained from LBSNAA Mussoorie, IIM Lucknow, MDI Gurgaon, World Bank Institute and Land Transport Academy, Singapore. He played pivotal role in the planning for the introduction of driverless trains in India during his deputation tenure at Delhi Metro Rail Corporation. At present he is associated with the planning of major transport related infrastructure projects in Jharkhand, Bihar, UP and Madhya Pradesh. BULLET TRAINS R.K. ROUSAN NATIONAL BOOK TRUST, INDIA First published in 2016 (Saka 1938) by the Director, National Book Trust, India Nehru Bhawan, 5 Institutional Area, Phase-II Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070 Website: www.nbtindia.gov.in Bengaluru • Kolkata • Mumbai Chennai • Guwahati • Hyderabad Agartala • Patna • Cuttack • Kochi © R.K. Rousan, 2016 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, transmitted, or stored in a retrieval system, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISBN 978-81-237-7974-4 ` 150.00 Lasertypeset by Capital Creations, New Delhi and printed at J.J. Offset Printers, Noida Introduction Preface vii 1. Introduction 1 2. Horse, Steam Engine and Shinkansen: History of Train Speed 7 3. Owl Feather and Kingfisher Dive: Technological Details of Bullet Train 30 4. Good or Bad Debate: Benefits and Criticism 70 5. Where is the Money? 92 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Wheel Rail Impact Loads and Track Settlement in Railway Crossings
    Wheel{Rail Impact Loads and Track Settlement in Railway Crossings XIN LI Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Gothenburg, Sweden 2019 THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN SOLID AND STRUCTURAL MECHANICS Wheel{Rail Impact Loads and Track Settlement in Railway Crossings XIN LI Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Gothenburg, Sweden 2019 Wheel{Rail Impact Loads and Track Settlement in Railway Crossings XIN LI ISBN 978-91-7905-164-8 ⃝c XIN LI, 2019 Doktorsavhandlingar vid Chalmers tekniska h¨ogskola Ny serie nr. 4631 ISSN 0346-718X Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 Gothenburg Sweden Telephone: +46 (0)31-772 1000 Cover: Picture of a railway crossing in Sk˚ane(Sweden) taken by Dr Bj¨ornP˚alsson Chalmers Reproservice Gothenburg, Sweden 2019 Wheel{Rail Impact Loads and Track Settlement in Railway Crossings Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Solid and Structural Mechanics XIN LI Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences Chalmers University of Technology Abstract Turnouts (Switches & Crossings, S&C) are critical components of a railway track requiring regular maintenance and generating high life cycle costs. A main driver for the high maintenance costs is the need to repair and replace switch rails and crossings as these components are subjected to a severe load environment. Dynamic wheel{rail contact forces with high magnitudes are often generated in the switch and crossing panels due to the discontinuities in rail profiles, resulting in a degradation of track geometry. One critical contribution to the track geometry degradation is track settlement.
    [Show full text]