DOCSLIB.ORG

Generation of a 3-D Parametric Solid Model of the Human Spine Using

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Generation of a 3-D Parametric Solid Model of the Human Spine Using GENERATION OF A 3-D PARAMETRIC SOLID MODEL OF THE HUMAN SPINE USING ANTHROPOMORPHIC PARAMETERS A thesis presented to the faculty of the Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ College of Engineering and Technology of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Douglas P. Breglia June 2006 This thesis entitled GENERATION OF A 3-D PARAMETRIC SOLID MODEL OF THE HUMAN SPINE USING ANTHROPOMORPHIC PARAMETERS by DOUGLAS P. BREGLIA has been approved for the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Russ College of Engineering and Technology by Bhavin Mehta Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering R. Dennis Irwin Dean, Russ College of Engineering and Technology Abstract BREGLIA, DOUGLAS P., M.S., June 2006. Mechanical Engineering GENERATION OF A 3-D PARAMETRIC SOLID MODEL OF THE HUMAN SPINE USING ANTHROPOMORPHIC PARAMETERS (98 pp.) Director of Thesis: Bhavin Mehta It has been shown that there is a correlation between stature and the dimensions of the vertebra in humans [1]. The objective of this thesis is to create a computer model of the vertebra that is personalized based on external metrics. To accomplish this, a parametrically linked solid model of the vertebrae is linked to the height, sex, and ethnicity of an individual. Vertebral morphologies presented in the literature are used to create geometric primitives of each bone. Relationships from forensic science are used to relate an individual’s stature to the heights of each of the vertebrae. Also, relationships between the vertebral height and the other dimensions of the vertebra are derived. These together can be used to create a model of each vertebra that is modified according to external human parameters. This model creates a simple and fast tool for the creation of personalized vertebral models. Approved: Bhavin Mehta Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering 4 Table of Contents Page Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 List of Figures......................................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1. The Human Body and Bio-Engineering ...................................................................................................... 8 1.3. The Spine: Anatomy and Function ............................................................................................................ 11 1.3.1. Sections of the Spine........................................................................................................................... 12 1.3.2. The Vertebra ....................................................................................................................................... 14 1.4. Forensic Osteology .................................................................................................................................... 18 1.5. Medical Imaging ........................................................................................................................................ 18 1.6. Statement of Thesis.................................................................................................................................... 20 1.7. Thesis Objectives....................................................................................................................................... 20 2. Literature Review.............................................................................................................................................. 22 2.1. Modeling the Spine and Vertebrae ............................................................................................................ 22 2.1.1. Whole Spine Models........................................................................................................................... 22 2.1.2. Vertebral Models ................................................................................................................................ 23 2.1.3. Intervertebral Disc, Lumbar, and Cervical Models ............................................................................ 24 2.1.4. Spinal Mobility - Condition and Instrumentation............................................................................... 26 2.2. Methods to Obtain a Model ....................................................................................................................... 26 2.3. External/Internal Parameter Matching....................................................................................................... 28 3. Methodology..................................................................................................................................................... 32 3.1. Software ..................................................................................................................................................... 32 3.2. Obtaining Data........................................................................................................................................... 32 3.3. Determination of Spinal Parameter Relationships..................................................................................... 38 3.3.1. Spinal Curve........................................................................................................................................ 38 3.3.2. Spinal Height and Vertebral Body Heights ........................................................................................ 40 3.3.3. Disc Heights........................................................................................................................................ 41 3.4. Determination of Vertebral Parameter Relationships................................................................................ 43 3.4.1. Distance Method & Area Method....................................................................................................... 45 3.4.2. Angular Parameters............................................................................................................................. 45 3.4.2.1. Endplate Inclination..................................................................................................................... 45 3.4.2.2. Articular Facet Angles ................................................................................................................. 47 3.4.2.3. Pedicle Inclination ....................................................................................................................... 48 3.4.3. Poor Correlation Parameters............................................................................................................... 49 3.5. Creating a Solid Model of a General Vertebra .......................................................................................... 52 3.5.1. Vertebral Body Model ........................................................................................................................ 54 3.5.2. Vertebral Arch Model......................................................................................................................... 56 3.6. Spinal Curve Model ................................................................................................................................... 64 3.7. Final Assembly of the Model..................................................................................................................... 67 4. Results and Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 70 5 4.1. The Spinal Model....................................................................................................................................... 70 4.2. Conclusions................................................................................................................................................ 75 References............................................................................................................................................................. 77 Appendix A........................................................................................................................................................... 84 Appendix B ........................................................................................................................................................... 85 Appendix C ........................................................................................................................................................... 86 Appendix D........................................................................................................................................................... 87 Appendix E ........................................................................................................................................................... 88 Appendix F...........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Determination of the Human Spine Curve Based on Laser Triangulation Primož Poredoš1*,Dušan Čelan2, Janez Možina1 and Matija Jezeršek1
    Poredoš et al. BMC Medical Imaging (2015) 15:2 DOI 10.1186/s12880-015-0044-5 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Determination of the human spine curve based on laser triangulation Primož Poredoš1*,Dušan Čelan2, Janez Možina1 and Matija Jezeršek1 Abstract Background: The main objective of the present method was to automatically obtain a spatial curve of the thoracic and lumbar spine based on a 3D shape measurement of a human torso with developed scoliosis. Manual determination of the spine curve, which was based on palpation of the thoracic and lumbar spinous processes, was found to be an appropriate way to validate the method. Therefore a new, noninvasive, optical 3D method for human torso evaluation in medical practice is introduced. Methods: Twenty-four patients with confirmed clinical diagnosis of scoliosis were scanned using a specially developed 3D laser profilometer. The measuring principle of the system is based on laser triangulation with one- laser-plane illumination. The measurement took approximately 10 seconds at 700 mm of the longitudinal translation along the back. The single point measurement accuracy was 0.1 mm. Computer analysis of the measured surface returned two 3D curves. The first curve was determined by manual marking (manual curve), and the second was determined by detecting surface curvature extremes (automatic curve). The manual and automatic curve comparison was given as the root mean square deviation (RMSD) for each patient. The intra-operator study involved assessing 20 successive measurements of the same person, and the inter-operator study involved assessing measurements from 8 operators. Results: The results obtained for the 24 patients showed that the typical RMSD between the manual and automatic curve was 5.0 mm in the frontal plane and 1.0 mm in the sagittal plane, which is a good result compared with palpatory accuracy (9.8 mm).
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Experimentally Induced Pain and Fear of Pain on Trunk Coordination and Back Muscle Activity During Walking
    Clinical Biomechanics 19 (2004) 551–563 www.elsevier.com/locate/clinbiomech Effects of experimentally induced pain and fear of pain on trunk coordination and back muscle activity during walking Claudine J.C. Lamoth a,b,*, Andreas Daffertshofer a, Onno G. Meijer a, G. Lorimer Moseley c, Paul I.J.M. Wuisman b, Peter J. Beek a a Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands b Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical Center Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands c Department of Physiotherapy, Royal Brisbane Hospital and The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia Received 3 February 2003; accepted 17 October 2003 Abstract Objective. To examine the effects of experimentally induced pain and fear of pain on trunk coordination and erector spinae EMG activity during gait. Design. In 12 healthy subjects, hypertonic saline (acute pain) and isotonic saline (fear of pain) were injected into erector spinae muscle, and unpredictable electric shocks (fear of impending pain) were presented during treadmill walking at different velocities, while trunk kinematics and EMG were recorded. Background. Chronic low back pain patients often have disturbed trunk coordination and enhanced erector spinae EMG while walking, which may either be due to the pain itself or to fear of pain, as is suggested by studies on both low back pain patients and healthy subjects. Methods. The effects of the aforementioned pain-related manipulations on trunk coordination and EMG were examined. Results. Trunk kinematics was not affected by the manipulations. Induced pain led to an increase in EMG variability and induced fear of pain to a decrease in mean EMG amplitude during double stance.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Anatomy
    A QUICK LOOK INTO HUMAN ANATOMY VP. KALANJATI VP. KALANJATI, FN. ARDHANA, WM. HENDRATA (EDS) PUBLISHER: PUSTAKA SAGA ISBN. ........................... 1 PREFACE BISMILLAHIRRAHMAANIRRAHIIM, IN THIS BOOK, SEVERAL TOPICS ARE ADDED TO IMPROVE THE CONTENT. WHILST STUDENTS OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES SEEK TO UNDERSTAND THE ESSENTIAL OF HUMAN ANATOMY WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS TO THE CLINICAL RELEVANCE. THIS BOOK IS AIMED TO ACHIEVE THIS GOAL BY PROVIDING A SIMPLE YET COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE BOOK USING BOTH ENGLISH AND LATIN TERMS. EACH CHAPTER IS COMPLETED WITH ACTIVITY, OBJECTIVE AND TASK FOR STUDENTS. IN THE END OF THIS BOOK, GLOSSARY AND INDEX ARE PROVIDED. POSITIVE COMMENT AND SUPPORT ARE WELCOME FOR BETTER EDITION IN THE FUTURE. SURABAYA, 2019 VP. KALANJATI Dedicated to all Soeronto, Raihan and Kalanjati. 2 CONTENT: PAGE COVER PREFACE CHAPTER: 1. UPPER LIMB 4 2. LOWER LIMB 18 3. THORAX 30 4. ABDOMEN 40 5. PELVIS AND PERINEUM 50 6. HEAD AND NECK 62 7. NEUROANATOMY 93 8. BACK 114 REFERENCES 119 ABBREVIATIONS 120 GLOSSARY 121 INDEX 128 3 CHAPTER 1 UPPER LIMB UPPER LIMB ACTIVITY: IN THIS CHAPTER, STUDENTS LEARN ABOUT THE STRUCTURES OF THE UPPER LIMB INCLUDING THE BONES, SOFT TISSUE, VESSELS, NERVES AND THE CONTENT OF SPECIFIC AREAS. THE MAIN FUNCTIONS OF SOME STRUCTURES ARE COVERED TO RELATE MORE TO THE CLINICAL PURPOSES. OBJECTIVE: UPON COMPLETING THIS CHAPTER, STUDENTS UNDERSTAND ABOUT THE ANATOMY OF HUMAN’S UPPER LIMB PER REGION I.E. SHOULDER, ARM, FOREARM AND HAND. 4 TASK FOR STUDENTS! 1. DRAW A COMPLETE SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF PLEXUS BRACHIALIS AND ITS BRANCHES! 2. DRAW A COMPLETE SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF THE VASCULARISATION IN THE UPPER LIMB! 5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors That May Influence the Postural Health of Schoolchildren (K-12)
    WORK A Journal of Prevention, Assessment &. Rehabilitation ELSEVIER Work 9 (1997) 45-55 Factors that may influence the postural health of schoolchildren (K-12) Betsey Yeats 15 Hillsdale Road, Arlington, MA 02174, USA Received 20 June 1996; revised; accepted 11 Febuary 1997 Abstract Ergonomic seating and proper positioning during the performance of activities is a major focus in the adult workplace. This focus, however, is typically ignored in classrooms where our youngest workers spend the majority of their time. A review of the literature was done to determine the effects of school furniture design on the postural health of schoolchildren (K-12). The review indicated that the adjustability of school furniture is an important design feature if children are to have equal educational opportunity, increased comfort, and decreased incidences of musculoskeletal symptoms. The effectiveness of ergonomic school furniture on schoolchildren has been demon­ strated in only one study reviewed in this paper. The other studies are reviewed in an effort to identify: (1) the variation of anthropometric measures of children; (2) the performance of activities exposing children to various postures; and (3) the physical design features of school furniture as three factors which influence the postural health of schoolchildren. © 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. Keywords: School furniture; Classroom furniture; Schoolchildren 1. Introduction major human performance area that encompasses life roles such as homemaker, employee, volun­ teer, student, or hobbyist' (Jacobs et al., 1992, p. Work means many things to many people and 1086). In keeping with this concept, schoolchil­ is not limited to regular, paid employment in dren (K-12) are workers and their classrooms are which many adults engage.
    [Show full text]
  • Neck, Shoulder, Arm Pain
    Neck, Shoulder, Arm Pain Mechanism, Diagnosis, and Treatment Fourth Edition Neck, Shoulder, Arm Pain: Mechanism, Diagnosis, and Treatment 4th edition James M. Cox, D.C., D.A.C.B.R. Developer, Cox® Technic Flexion Distraction Fort Wayne, Indiana Post Graduate Faculty Member National University of Health Sciences Lombard, Illinois Diplomate American Chiropractic Board of Radiology Cox® Technic Resource Center, Inc. Fort Wayne, Indiana 2 Copyright 2014 Cox® Technic Resource Center, Inc. 429 E. Dupont Road #98 Fort Wayne, IN 46825 1-800-441-5571 or 1-260-637-6609 All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, including photocopying, or utilized by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the copyright owner. The publisher is not responsible (as a matter of product liability, negligence or otherwise) for any injury resulting from any material contained herein. This publication contains information relating to general principles of medical care which should not be construed as specific instructions for individual patients. Manufacturers’ product information and package inserts should be reviewed for current information, including contraindications, dosages and precautions. Printed in the United States of America First edition, 1992 Second edition, 1997 Third edition, 2005 ISBN (13) number 978-0-692-22557-8 Visit www.coxtrc.com for more educational materials. Visit www.coxtechnic.com for more information on Cox® Technic and procedures. Important NOTE: Please realize that this textbook is current to its date of publication. New research comes to life daily. To keep up to date with information since the publication date, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Side-To-Side Comparison of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Intact Function in Individuals
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2019 Side-to-Side Comparison of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Intact Function in Individuals Sarah Rose Walden University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Biomechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Walden, Sarah Rose, "Side-to-Side Comparison of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Intact Function in Individuals" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1698. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/1698 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Side-to-Side Comparison of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Intact Function in Individuals A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Daniel Felix Ritchie School of Engineering and Computer Science University of Denver In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Sarah Walden August 2019 Advisor: Dr. Kevin Shelburne Author: Sarah Walden Title: Side-to-Side Comparison of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Intact Function in Individuals Advisor: Dr. Kevin Shelburne Degree Date: August 2019 Abstract Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) is a surgery which replaces the shoulder joint, or the interface between the humerus and the scapula glenoid. To test TSA success, most prior research compares patients with TSA to healthy controls. However, the shoulder anthropometry, motion, and musculature of individuals varies widely across the population making it important to assess TSA performance in individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0264791 A1 Frank (43) Pub
    US 20060264.791A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0264791 A1 Frank (43) Pub. Date: Nov. 23, 2006 (54) DOME-SHAPED BACK BRACE (52) U.S. Cl. ................................................................ 6O2A19 (76) Inventor: William Frank, Powell, OH (US) (57) ABSTRACT Correspondence Address: .SESSRGGIO, PA A brace for supporting both the abdomen and lower back of FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 (US) the user. The brace includes a preformed abdominal support member and a preformed lumbar Support member having an (21) Appl. No.: 10/908,570 ideal lumbar shape with a circular dome that is vertically bisected by an oblong, elliptical protrusion, the Support (22) Filed: May 17, 2005 members each joined by two belts. The belts are positioned through slots on each member and are used to select the Publication Classification biasing force needed for each user. The device further includes rounded corners with indented edges and Surface (51) Int. Cl. vents on each Support member for the user's comfort during A6DF 5/00 (2006.01) sporting events or strenuous activity. Patent Application Publication Nov. 23, 2006 Sheet 1 of 6 US 2006/0264791 A1 FIG. 1 Patent Application Publication Nov. 23, 2006 Sheet 2 of 6 US 2006/0264791 A1 FIG 2 4A Patent Application Publication Nov. 23, 2006 Sheet 3 of 6 US 2006/0264791 A1 FIG. 3B Patent Application Publication Nov. 23, 2006 Sheet 4 of 6 US 2006/0264791 A1 FIG. 4B Patent Application Publication Nov. 23, 2006 Sheet 5 of 6 US 2006/0264791 A1 Patent Application Publication Nov. 23, 2006 Sheet 6 of 6 US 2006/0264791 A1 FIG.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Head Neck Response in Frontal, Lateral and Rear End Impact Loading : Modelling and Validation
    Human head neck response in frontal, lateral and rear end impact loading : modelling and validation Citation for published version (APA): Horst, van der, M. J. (2002). Human head neck response in frontal, lateral and rear end impact loading : modelling and validation. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR554047 DOI: 10.6100/IR554047 Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2002 Document Version: Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Shape Analysis for the Human Back
    Statistical Shape Analysis for the Human Back ARIF REZA ANWARY A thesis submitted to the department of Engineering and Technology in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy in Production and Manufacturing Engineering at the University of Wolverhampton The research was carried out with the Research and Teaching Centre of the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham May 2012 Statistical Shape Analysis for the Human Back Statistical Shape Analysis for the Human Back ARIF REZA ANWARY MAY 2012 This work or any part thereof ha s not previously been presented in any form to the University or to any other body whether for the purpose of assessment, public ation or for any other purpose (unless otherwise indicated ). Save for any express acknowledgements, references and/or bibliographies cited in the work, I confirm that the intellectual content of the work is the result of my own efforts and of no other person. The right of Arif Reza Anwary to be identified as author of this work is asserted in accordance with ss.77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. At this date copyright is owned by the author. Signature :____________________ Date : ________________________ Statistical Shape Analysis for the Human Back Abstract In this research, Procrustes and Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA) have been investigated for analysing the three-dimensional shape and form of the human back. Procrustes analysis is used to distinguish deformed backs from normal backs. EDMA is used to locate the changes occurring on the back surface due to spinal deformity (scoliosis, kyphosis and lordosis) for back deformity patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Loading and Recovery Behavior of the Human Lumbar Spine Under Static Flexion
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Loading and recovery behavior of the human lumbar spine under static flexion Guntulu Selen Hatipkarasulu Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Engineering Science and Materials Commons Recommended Citation Hatipkarasulu, Guntulu Selen, "Loading and recovery behavior of the human lumbar spine under static flexion" (2006). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 457. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/457 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. LOADING AND RECOVERY BEHAVIOR OF THE HUMAN LUMBAR SPINE UNDER STATIC FLEXION A Dissertation Submitted to Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Interdepartmental Program in Engineering Science by Guntulu Selen Hatipkarasulu B.S. in C.E., Çukurova University, 1997 M.S. in I.E., Louisiana State University, 2002 May 2006 To my husband Yilmaz, my son Koral, and my parents M. Ozkan and Gulseren ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge the support and advice of several people in helping me through this project. First, I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Fereydoun Aghazadeh for helping me to start and complete my studies at Louisiana State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflex Control of Human Trunk Muscles
    REFLEX CONTROL OF HUMAN TRUNK MUSCLES Iain David Beith A thesis submitted to the University of London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Physiology University College London ProQuest Number: 10014995 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10014995 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT Muscles of the human trunk are arranged in layers and attach either to the vertebral column or to the pelvis and thorax. Present understanding suggests the deeper muscles, attached to the vertebral column, stabilise the spine, whereas the more superficial muscles, attached to the thorax and pelvis, produce and control trunk movement. If so, the control of these two groups may differ, with deeper muscles working synergistically and those more superficially located acting antagonistically to one another. To this end the role that reflex connections between the different muscles may play in mediating either synergistic or antagonistic roles was investigated. Muscle afferent activity was evoked via a series of mechanical taps applied to individual muscle/tendon complexes of three abdominal and two paraspinal muscles by means of a mechanical tapping device.
    [Show full text]
  • Osteometric Variation of the Human Spine in Central Europe by Historic Time Period and Its Microevolutionary Implications
    \l N/ PhD - Thesis by osteometric variation of the Human spine in central Europe Historic Time Period and Its Microevolutionary Implications Dr. med. Frank Jakobus Rühli Unit Biological Anthiopology and Comparative Anatomy Research Department of Anatomical Sciences The University of Adelaide - Australia Supervisor: Prof. Dr. M. Henneberg of Adelaide - Australia Department of Anatomical sciences, The university Co-SuPervisor: Prof. Dr. Dr. M. Schultz ZentrumAnatomie,Georg-August-UniversitätGöttingen-Deutschland June 2003 Table of Contents Tables ..... 5 Figures ... 7 Abstract .. 9 Statement 11 Acknowledgments .. t2 Introduction I4 Anatomical aspects of the human spine ...'........' l4 sexual dimorphism and age-related adaptalions of the human spine .... 27 Biomechanics and spinal morphology........'.'.' 31 Osteometric findings of earlier spinal studies ... 34 lmpact of osteometric research of the human spine .................' 51 Spinal pathologies - especially lower back pain 59 Clinical and dynamic assessment of the spinal neural pathways""' 68 Historical perspectives of spinal disorders and morphometry "'..". 78 The non-human spine 83 Major evolution of the human spine and its physiological adaptations 87 Anatomical variations of the spine ........ 92 Microevolutionary and secular trends in human anatomy ...'. 97 Aim of the study ................ 105 Hypothesis to be tested .. 105 Material 106 Supplementary information on the samples ... rt2 2 F. J. Rühli - Osteometric Variation of the Human Spine Methods 119 Measurements ............ 119 Technical equipment t28 Estimation of intra- and inter-observer error r29 Examination permission 135 Data analysis 135 Critical sample size ......... 136 Modern samples ... r37 Results t39 Sex and age composition of the samples 139 Descriptive statistics of the measurements ..'..'...' t39 Osteometric data of the whole sample t42 Sexual dimorphism 150 Side differences of spinal measurements ..'..'.....'......
    [Show full text]