DOCSLIB.ORG

Philippines Transport for Growth an Institutional Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Public Disclosure Authorized

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Philippines Transport for Growth an Institutional Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. 47281-PH Report No. 47281-PH Philippines Transport for Growth An Institutional Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Public Disclosure Authorized February 24, 2009 Poverty Reduction and Economic Management East Asia and Pacific Region Philippines Public Disclosure Authorized Transport for Growth Transport Public Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB Asian Development Bank BOT Build-Operate-Transfer CAAP Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines CIDA Canadian International Development Agency CIIP Comprehensive Integrated Infrastructure Program DOTC Department of Transportation and Communications DPWH Department of Public Works and Highways GDP Gross Domestic Product GNP Gross National Product GOCC Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation HDM-4 Highway Development and Management Version 4 ICC Investment Coordinating Committee, National Economic and Development Authority IT Information Technology JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency LRT Light Rail Transit LRTA Light Rail Transit Authority MRT Mass Rail Transit MTEF Medium-Term Expenditure Framework MTPDP Medium-Term Philippine Development Plan MTPIP Medium-Term Public Investment Program MVUC Motor Vehicle User’s Charge under Republic Act 8794 NAIA Ninoy Aquino International Airport PEGR Philippines Australian Partnership for Economic Governance Reform (PDAF) Priority Development Assistance Fund PPIAF Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility PNCC Philippine National Construction Corporation PPP Public-Private Partnership CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................1 1. GROWTH AND TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE....................................................................2 ECONOMIC RECOVERY..................................................................................................................................2 SUSTAINING GROWTH...................................................................................................................................4 INFRASTRUCTURE AS A DRIVER FOR CONTINUED GROWTH...........................................................................5 COMMITMENT TO INCREASED INFRASTRUCTURE SPENDING.........................................................................7 2. TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE PHILIPPINES........................................................9 FINDINGS.......................................................................................................................................................9 Infrastructure Quantity ...........................................................................................................................9 Infrastructure quality............................................................................................................................11 Overall assessment of the transport infrastructure network and services ...........................................14 RECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................................................................................18 FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................................................19 Total infrastructure expenditure...........................................................................................................19 Spending on transport infrastructure ...................................................................................................23 Transport infrastructure maintenance spending ..................................................................................24 Road maintenance spending .................................................................................................................25 Expenditure by organization.................................................................................................................28 Government Owned and Controlled Corporations ..............................................................................34 Government plans for future spending .................................................................................................38 RECOMMENDATION ....................................................................................................................................39 Increasing funding for transport infrastructure investments................................................................39 Additional funding for maintenance .....................................................................................................40 3. INSTITUTIONAL SET-UP FOR TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE PROVISION..............42 FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................................................42 Policy-formulation, Budgeting and planning .......................................................................................43 Regulatory and operational responsibilities.........................................................................................43 Provision of local transport infrastructure...........................................................................................44 Government owned and controlled corporations .................................................................................45 The private sector..................................................................................................................................47 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................................................49 4. PLANNING, BUDGETING AND PROJECT SELECTION.........................................................51 FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................................................52 Planning................................................................................................................................................52 Project Preparation ..............................................................................................................................53 Budgeting ..............................................................................................................................................54 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................................................56 Overall Planning...................................................................................................................................56 Project selection....................................................................................................................................57 Budgeting ..............................................................................................................................................58 5. IMPROVING LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PROVISION ..........................60 FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................................................60 Financing – Tax ....................................................................................................................................61 Financing – Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) ....................................................................................62 Financing – Borrowing.........................................................................................................................62 Urban bias.............................................................................................................................................63 Local planning and budgeting ..............................................................................................................63 Links Between Local and National Planning and Budgeting...............................................................65 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................................................66 Financing ..............................................................................................................................................66 Local Planning and Budgeting .............................................................................................................67 Links Between Local and National Planning and Budgeting...............................................................68 6. RESTRUCTURING SELECTED GOVERNMENT OWNED AND CONTROLLED CORPORATIONS........................................................................................................................................69 FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................................................69 Government Subsidies and Agency Debts ............................................................................................69 The Philippine National Railways ........................................................................................................70 The Light Rail Transit Authority...........................................................................................................73
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Impediments to Urban-Rural Connectivity in Cdi Cities
    ASSESSMENT OF IMPEDIMENTS TO URBAN-RURAL CONNECTIVITY IN CDI CITIES Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project CONTRACT NO. AID-492-H-15-00001 JANUARY 27, 2017 This report is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) and do not necessarily reflect the view of USAID or the United States Agency for International Development USAID Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project Page i Pre-Feasibility Study for the Upgrading of the Tagbilaran City Slaughterhouse ASSESSMENT OF IMPEDIMENTS TO URBAN-RURAL CONNECTIVITY IN CDI CITIES Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project CONTRACT NO. AID-492-H-15-00001 Program Title: USAID/SURGE Sponsoring USAID Office: USAID/Philippines Contract Number: AID-492-H-15-00001 Contractor: International City/County Management Association (ICMA) Date of Publication: January 27, 2017 USAID Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project Page ii Assessment of Impediments to Urban-Rural Connectivity in CDI Cities Contents I. Executive Summary 1 II. Introduction 7 II. Methodology 9 A. Research Methods 9 B. Diagnostic Tool to Assess Urban-Rural Connectivity 9 III. City Assessments and Recommendations 14 A. Batangas City 14 B. Puerto Princesa City 26 C. Iloilo City 40 D. Tagbilaran City 50 E. Cagayan de Oro City 66 F. Zamboanga City 79 Tables Table 1. Schedule of Assessments Conducted in CDI Cities 9 Table 2. Cargo Throughput at the Batangas Seaport, in metric tons (2015 data) 15 Table 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Implementation Plan
    CHAPTER 5 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The Supplementary Survey on North South Commuter Rail Project (Phase II-A) in the Republic of the Philippines FINAL REPORT CHAPTER 5 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING 5.1 Examination of Preliminary Construction Plan The construction of NSCR will require careful planning and organization, given the magnitude of the works, time constraints and the location of the works on busy national and arterial roads within Metropolitan Manila and Bulacan Province. 5.1.1 Temporary Works 1) Temporary Access to Site It is necessary to apply countermeasures flooding during heavy rain season because of the low ground level between Malolos and Caloocan. There is no problem with an access road to the site along the main road in this area. However, it is necessary to consider to construct temporary access to site far from main roads. In swampy areas between Malolos and San Fernando along the PNR Route, it is necessary to construct a temporary steel stage for machinery or materials transportation during construction. It is necessary to install sheet piles to avoid an intrusion of ground water during construction of the substructure. 2) Sufficient Space for the Works There are some narrow ROW sections between Malolos and Caloocan along the PNR Route. During construction of elevated structures, it is necessary to have more than 15m width for access road to secure access of many trucks, truck mixers and other construction equipment transportation to the site. After construction, the temporary access shall be maintained more than 15m width as a service road for maintenance or emergency evacuation. Source: JICA Study Team Figure 5.1.1 Necessary ROW for Elevated Structures 5-1 5.1.2 Viaduct 5.1.2.1 Foundations Viaduct foundations comprise of conventional bored piles and pile caps.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Financial Statements
    METRO PACIFIC TOLLWAYS CORPORATION April 16, 2012 PHILIPPINE STOCK EXCHANGE Disclosure Department 3/F PSE Plaza Ayala Triangle, Ayala Avenue Makati City Attention: MS. JANET A. ENCARNACION Head Disclosure Department Re: SEC Form 17-C METRO PACIFIC TOLLWAYS CORPORATION (“MPTC”) (PSE: TOL) Attached is the Company’s annual report for the year ended December 31, 2011. There is no other information known to management that needs to be disclosed as of the coverage date of this report. If any required information is not disclosed, it is not applicable to the Company. We hope you find everything in order. Thank you. Respectfully yours, Christopher Daniel C. Lizo Chief Finance Officer and Treasurer 4 0 5 9 0 SEC Registration Number M E T R O P A C I F I C T O L L W A Y S C O R P O R A T I O N ( F o r m e r l y F i r s t P h i l i p p i n e I n f r a s t r u c t u r e , I n c . ) A N D S U B S I D I A R I E S (Company’s Full Name) 1 0 t h F l o o r , M G O B u i l d i n g , L e g a s p i c o r . D e l a R o s a S t s . , M a k a t i C i t y (Business Address: No.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH LUZON, PHILIPPINES Case Study (Transportation)
    NORTH LUZON, PHILIPPINES Case Study (Transportation) Project Summary: The Republic of the Philippines is an archipelagic nation in Southeast Asia comprised of 7,107 islands. The Philippines is home to over 91 million people, living on approximately 300,000 square kilometers. About half the population lives on the island of Luzon, where the capital, Manila, is located. Congestion in and around the capital is an area of concern for the Philippine government. The North Luzon Expressway is the main transport corridor from the Manila metropolitan area to central and north Luzon; there is no viable alternative for travelers. Built between 1975 and 1977 by the Department of Public Works and Highways, the expressway operated as a toll road. Originally, the expressway was franchised to a private company; however, this was later taken over by the government and renamed the Philippine National Construction Corporation PNCC). Under PNCC’s management, the expressway was not adequately maintained. In addition, growing traffic volume meant that the expressway’s capacity could no longer meet commuter needs. By the mid-1990s, about 160,000 vehicles traveled on the expressway each day, but with narrow lanes and heavy traffic, congestion became a major problem. The expressway also experienced a large number of avoidable accidents and deaths over the years. In the early 1990s, the Philippine government passed legislation that promoted and regulated the use of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in repairing existing infrastructure and building new projects. The Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) Law of 1993 (as amended in 1994) provided the opportunity to utilize a BOT-type approach to modernizing the North Luzon Expressway.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Seminar on Asian Toll Road Development in an Era Of
    The World Bank Ministry of Construction, Japan Seminar on Asian Toll Road Development in an Era of Financial Crisis Tokyo International Forum: March 9 – 11, 1999 Proceedings of the Seminar Volume I: Main Text March 1999 PADECO Co., Ltd. in association with Highway Planning Inc., and Value Management Institute, Inc. “Exchange of Knowledge” Panel Discussion on the third day of the Seminar Seminar Venue Tokyo International Forum (Photo courtesy of the Tokyo International Foundation) Proceedings of the Seminar Table of Contents Table of Contents Volume I: Main Text 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................1-1 2 OPENING ADDRESS, Session 1-1 .................................................................................2-1 • Mr. Kei-ichi Inoue, Ministry of Construction, Japan .........................................2-1 3 KEYNOTE SPEECH, Session 1-2...................................................................................3-1 • Prof. Yataro Fujii, Keio University, Japan..........................................................3-1 4 MAJOR TOLL ROAD ISSUES AND LESSONS LEARNED, Session 1-3 (Text of Speech and Selected Discussion) .........................................................4-1 • Dr. Chiaki Kuranami, PADECO Co., Ltd., Japan ..............................................4-1 5. ROAD DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE CURRENT ECONOMIC SITUATION IN ASIA, Session 1-4 (Summary of Presentations and Selected Discussion) ........5-1 • Ir. Sumaryanto Widayatin, Bina
    [Show full text]
  • A Policy Brief on Philippine Roads and Rail Infrastructure
    A Policy Brief on Philippine Roads and Rail Infrastructure AUTHOR JOHN D. FORBES is a private business consultant, author, and public speaker. He is Senior Adviser of the Arangkada Philippines Project at the American Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines (AmCham) and chairman of its Legislative Committee. He is also a senior counselor for Vriens and Partners Pte. Ltd. of Singapore. John is the author of Arangkada Philippines 2010: A Business Perspective and two AmCham Roadmaps to More Foreign Investment in the Philippines. The American Enterprise Institute published his monograph Jamaica: Managing Political and Economic Change in a Third World Democracy. He received his education from Georgetown University, Princeton University, and Harvard University and served as an American diplomat for 25 years, beginning in Vietnam and the Philippines. John worked in the Bureau of East Asia and Pacific Affairs, the Bureau of Congressional Affairs, the Policy Planning Staff, the US Congress, and as a Special Assistant to the Undersecretary for Political Affairs. POLICY BRIEF EDITORIAL TEAM: Editor-in-Chief: John D. Forbes Managing Editor: Sarah Kathrina F. Gomez Economic Researcher: Charles John P. Marquez Research Assistant: Lia Angela H. Daus Cover: Christina Maria D. Tuguigui Layout: Mary Grace Dilag-Mojica LIST OF SPONSORS • American Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines, Inc. • Australian-New Zealand Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines • Bankers Association of the Philippines • Canadian Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines • Confederation of Wearable Exporters of the Philippines • European Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines • Foundation for Economic Freedom • Japanese Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Philippines, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study of Master Plan on High Standard Highway Network Development in the Republic of the Philippines
    JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS The Study of Masterplan on High Standard Highway Network Development In the Republic of the Philippines RRegionalegional GrowthGrowth PolePole CityCity Frontage Road （PrimaryPrimary CityCity） Grade Separation Small City （Tertiary City） Small City （ ） Tertiary City Small City ss （Tertiary City） pa Small City y （Tertiary City） RRegionalegional GGrowthrowth B PPoleole CCityity Medium City Special （Secondary City） （PrimaryPrimary CCityity） Economic Zone National Road Town Small City MegaMega CityCity （Tertiary City） HSH 1 International Airport IInternationalnternational PPortort HSH 1 FINAL REPORT Executive Summary JULY 2010 CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. EID JR 10-100(1/4) JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS THE STUDY OF MASTER PLAN ON HIGH STANDARD HIGHWAY NETWORK DEVELOPMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES FINAL REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY JULY 2010 CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. EXCHANGE RATE February 2010 1 PhP = 1.95 Japan Yen 1 US$ = 46.31 Philippine Peso 1 US$ = 90.14 Japan Yen Central Bank of the Philippines PREFACE In response to the request of the Government of the Republic of the Philippines, the Government of Japan decided to conduct the “Study of Master Plan on High Standard Highway Network Development in the Republic of the Philippines” and entrusted the Study to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). JICA selected
    [Show full text]
  • Preparatory Survey on PPP Project for Development of a Connector Road in Manila
    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Preparatory Survey on PPP Project for Development of a connector road in Manila FINAL REPORT (JR) October 2011 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY Oriental Consultants Co., Ltd. Central Nippon Expressway Company Limited OPS West Nippon Expressway Company Limited （先） CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. JR 11- 011 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Preparatory Survey on PPP Project for Development of a connector road in Manila FINAL REPORT (JR) October 2011 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY Oriental Consultants Co., Ltd. Central Nippon Expressway Company Limited West Nippon Expressway Company Limited CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. ABBREVIATION (1/3) AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Office ADB Asian Development Bank ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials AVI Automatic Vehicle Identification BCDA Base Conversion Development Authority BIR Bureau of Internal Revenue BOT Build-Operate-Transfer BPO Business Processing Outsourcing CCTV Closed-Circuit Television CDCP Construction Development Corporation of the Philippines CTMS Central Traffic Control System DBM Department of Budget and Management DBP Development Bank of the Philippines DED Detailed Engineering Design DENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources DFS Detailed Feasibility Study DOF Department of Finance DPWH Department of Public Works and Highways DSCR Debt Service Coverage Ratio ECB Emergency Call Box ECC Environmental Compliance Certificate EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIRR Economic Internal
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Pacific Tollways Corporation and Subsidiaries
    Metro Pacific Tollways Corporation (A Subsidiary of Metro Pacific Investments Corporation) and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2019 and 2018 and Independent Auditor’s Report SyCip Gorres Velayo & Co. Tel: (632) 891 0307 BOA/PRC Reg. No. 0001, 6760 Ayala Avenue Fax: (632) 819 0872 October 4, 2018, valid until August 24, 2021 1226 Makati City ey.com/ph SEC Accreditation No. 0012-FR-5 (Group A), Philippines November 6, 2018, valid until November 5, 2021 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT The Board of Directors and Stockholders Metro Pacific Tollways Corporation Opinion We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Metro Pacific Tollways Corporation (a subsidiary of Metro Pacific Investments Corporation) and its subsidiaries (the Company), which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the consolidated statements of income, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of changes in equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for the years then ended, and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRSs). Basis for Opinion We conducted our audits in accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing (PSAs). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements section of our report.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Transport Infrastructure Development in the Philippines: a Roadmap Toward Land Value Capture
    JULY 2018 Funding Transport Infrastructure Development in the Philippines: A Roadmap Toward Land Value Capture Haraya Buensuceso and Cesar Purisima EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prevailing discussions surrounding transport infrastructure in the Philippines tend to focus on the boons and banes of different financing models. While such discussions are important and worthwhile, the fact remains that the sustainability of a transport service ultimately hinges on the ability to pay for it. Whether publicly or privately financed, adequate and reliable funding underlies every project’s long-term success. This paper examines a class of funding tools that has been underutilized, but which the Philippine government may consider using as it plans for an era of “Build, Build, Build.” Land value capture, or LVC for short, takes a “beneficiary-pays” approach to infrastructure and encompasses a plethora of strategies that leverage the benefits of higher land values typically found around transport infrastructure such as urban transit stations, corridors, integration hubs, and roads. For many years, there have been two conflicting demands on who should take on the burden of paying for transport projects. On the one hand, there are calls to reduce transit subsidies, which impose a large tax burden on the population, including nonusers. On the other hand, there is continual pressure to keep transit fares at an affordable level for the commuting public. LVC provides a way out of this conundrum and offers the prospect of an infrastructure funding mix that is more equitable, efficient, and sustainable. LVC has taken on various forms around the world, but not all may be suitable for the Philippine context.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Toll Road Development Program (1999)
    The World Bank Ministry of Construction, Japan Asian Toll Road Development Program Review of Recent Toll Road Experience in Selected Countries and Preliminary Tool Kit for Toll Road Development Draft Final Report May 1999 in association with Highway Planning Inc., and Value Management Institute, Inc. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was prepared based on a study financed by the World Bank for the Asian Toll Road Development Program. It was prepared under the direction of the World Bank Steering Committee chaired by Alfred Nickesen; the Steering Committee of the Ministry of Construction, Japan, headed by Junichi Matoba; and the Japanese Advisory Committee headed by Prof. Yataro Fujii. They have all provided valuable assistance and comments to the authors during the study period. The authors also would like to acknowledge various others including Setsuo Hirai of the World Bank, the Task Leader of this project; the advisory team of the Expressway Technology Center and the Express Highway Research Foundation headed by Yoshimichi Kawasumi; and Mitchel Stanfield of MSA. Their assistance in information collection and comments on the earlier drafts has been helpful. Finally, the authors wish to extend their gratitude to a number of individuals who kindly shared their valuable experience and insights with us during the country visits to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines. A complete list of the members of the Steering and Advisory Committees mentioned above, and a list of individuals who were interviewed by the consultants are included in the Appendicies of this report. The primary authors of this report were Chiaki Kuranami, Bruce P.
    [Show full text]
  • AWARDED Ppp PROJECTS As of November 2020 Republic of the Philippines Public-Private Partnership Center 8Th Floor, One Cyberpod Centris EDSA Cor
    AWARDED ppp PROJECTS As of november 2020 Republic of the Philippines Public-Private Partnership Center 8th Floor, One Cyberpod Centris EDSA cor. Quezon Ave., Quezon City 1100 (+632) 8709-4146 For more information, please visit: www.ppp.gov.ph For inquiries, e-mail us: [email protected] Or follow our social media accounts: PPPCenter.Philippines @PPP_Ph PPPPinas Public-Private Partnership Center of the Philippines PRINTED NOVEMBER 2020 Table of Contents 3 AmBisyon Natin 2040 and Build, Build, Build 4 PPP Concept 4 PPP Process 5 Legal Framework 6 The PPP Center of the Philippines 7 The PPP Program 8 Awarded PPP Projects 46 Doing Business in the Philippines Ambisyon Natin 2040 AmBisyon Natin 2040 represents the collective long-term vision and aspirations of the Filipino people for themselves and for the country in the next 25 years. It describes the kind of life the Filipinos want to live, and how the country will be by 2040. As such, it is an anchor for development planning across at least four administrations. By 2040, Filipinos will enjoy a strongly rooted, comfortable, and secure life. In 2040, we will all enjoy a stable and comfortable lifestyle, secure in the ​knowledge that we have enough for our daily needs and unexpected expenses, and that we can plan and prepare for our own and our children’s future. Our family lives together in a place of our own, and we have the freedom to go where we desire, protected and enabled by a clean, efficient, and fair government. build, build, build Infrastructure is among the top priorities of the government, with public spending on infrastructure projects targeted to reach Php 8-9 trillion from 2017 to 2022.
    [Show full text]