Smart Retail in Smart Cities: Best Practice Analysis of Local Online Platforms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Smart Retail in Smart Cities: Best Practice Analysis of Local Online Platforms Smart Retail in Smart Cities: Best Practice Analysis of Local Online Platforms Katrin Schade, Marcus Hübscher and Tanja Korzer Institute of Urban Development and Construction Management, Leipzig University, Grimmaische Straße 12, Leipzig, Germany Keywords: e-Commerce, Local Online Platform, Smart City, European City, Smart Retail. Abstract: Against the background of urban transformation processes aggravated by e-commerce, this paper discusses chances and challenges of local online platforms. Three hypotheses are introduced. Firstly, the rapid emergence of numerous local online platforms in various European countries is linked to the urban heritage of the European City. Secondly, the success of these platforms depends on the integration of diverse services. Thirdly it is argued, that platforms need to adapt to future topics of smart retail which is why a more holistic approach is appropriate. A best practice analysis is conducted, which gives an insight into the variety and complexity of local online platforms. 1 ADAPT OR DIE: SPATIAL Whereas mainly small towns used to be affected, shop vacancies in city centers in e.g. Leipzig are IMPACTS OF E-COMMERCE already noticeable. Operation-wise, especially small and medium-sized owner-managed retailers struggle High growth rates in e-commerce have contributed to to get involved with omni-channel services, whereas urban transformation processes in Europe in the last chain stores tend to adapt faster to trends in e- decade (Beckmann et al., 2016, p. 8). Location-wise, commerce. primary effects of e-commerce caused by market leaders such as Amazon and eBay are expected to 1.1 The Origin of Local Online change persisting structures in the retail sector. In Germany alone, a close-down of 50.000 shops is Platforms predicted until 2020 (HDE, 2016). As a consequence, For the last six years, diverse digital bottom-up retail shop vacancies rise and city centers decline (fig. 1). initiatives in Germany and other European countries have been emerging. The main goal of these so called local online platforms (LOPs) is to retain purchasing power in the respective region, concerning only respective local, mainly brick and mortar retailers. LOPs network local retailers with a universal digital platform, such as homepage or app. Some platforms also contain location-based information, for example event calendars or information on local activities in the city centers. Either way, LOPs present a multilateral approach by initiating omni-channel services which aim to improve retailers’ perception through customers in digital and urban space, to survive on the market. Probably one of the most popular LOPs within the academic discourse that emerged in Germany is ‘Online City Wuppertal’. The platform started in Figure 1: Shop vacancies in different (sub)urban settings in 2013, funded as a pilot project of the joint initiative Leipzig (2018), own source. 147 Schade, K., Hübscher, M. and Korzer, T. Smart Retail in Smart Cities: Best Practice Analysis of Local Online Platforms. DOI: 10.5220/0006844901470157 In Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications (ICETE 2018) - Volume 1: DCNET, ICE-B, OPTICS, SIGMAP and WINSYS, pages 147-157 ISBN: 978-989-758-319-3 Copyright © 2018 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved ICE-B 2018 - International Conference on e-Business of the German state, its counties and cities, called and argue that characteristics of the European City ‘Nationale Stadtentwicklungspolitik’ (national urban facilitate the emergence of local online platforms. development policy). The pilot project ‘Online City Whereas most platforms’ focus lies on commerce, Wuppertal’ aims at transforming stationary retail, there are also LOPs that contain urban, especially city with the help of omni-channel services (Haderlein, center-relevant services, in addition to retail services, 2018). The website of ‘Online City Wuppertal’ such as ‘Online City Wuppertal’, e.g. they inform includes 59 different profiles of mainly local retailers about local events or list local clubs. The location who have a local store in Wuppertal. For local specific aspects help to distinguish cities and retailers, an advantage of the platform is that the contribute to their uniqueness. Introducing the operator helps local retailers, who do not have an own empirical analysis with the second hypothesis, we web shop, to sell their products online through the claim that the success of local online platforms website of ‘Online City Wuppertal’. The website depends on the integration of diverse services. The contains a large categorized web shop out of all the strength and competitiveness therefore lies in the products the participating local retailers offer, like a location’s specific characteristics. local version of Amazon. Local retailers who already Currently, one notices a rise and fall of LOPs. have an own web shop or website can also become This might be due to the platforms’ still being in a members. For them, the advantage is that the platform starting phase. Also the high number of competitors has an own budget for marketing that is larger than plays a key role. We thirdly argue that local online the expected budget of a single local retailer. Thus, platforms need to adapt to future topics of smart retail ‘Online City Wuppertal’ contributes to improving, in order to survive on the market. the local retailers’ perception through customers in digital and urban space and to survive on the market. Additionally, the platform contains a few urban 2 STATE OF THE ART IN services, e.g. it informs about local events in the city center of Wuppertal. However, the success of ‘Online RESEARCH City Wuppertal’ seems to be unsteady for different reasons, e.g. the number of customers visiting and At the present time only few scholars have examined buying on the platform is low (Haderlein, 2018). LOPs. This sections gives an overview about the By now, Germany counts more LOPs than any existing framework sources, starting with the other country. The platforms try to follow the concepts of smart city and smart retail. Emphasis is example of ‘Online City Wuppertal’ or even become put on the spatial distribution of emerging LOPs. more successful (CIMA, 2018). However, the Therefore, geographical patterns are not only platforms differ from each other concerning their identified, but also tried to understand by means of functionalities and specializations. There seem to be the existing academic discourse. relevant differences that lead to either success or failure of LOPs which is why the paper offers a best 2.1 Future Topics of Smart Retail practice analysis. The authors aim to analyze chances and challenges of LOPs to offer smart retail services The smart city approach does not primarily refer to e- in smart cities. commerce. However, according to Silva et al. (2018, p. 700) “[…] utilization of best practices and 1.2 Aim and Scope of the Paper applications of e-commerce and e-business to escalate the city productivity is known as smart To address the lack of research, a best practice economy. […]”. Moreover, Bakıcı et al. (2013, p. analysis of LOPs is carried out, focusing on the 139) define the “[…] smart city as a high-tech chances and challenges of existing platforms. This is intensive and advanced city that connects people, done in the light of smart cities. Within the analysis, information and city elements using new technologies the importance of a more holistic approach is in order to create a sustainable, greener city, demonstrated. We propose three hypotheses. Firstly, competitive and innovative commerce, and an the high amount of LOPs in Europe raises the increased life quality.” Silva et al.’s discussion of the question, why similar strategies cannot be observed smart city, is based on the city of Barcelona. Both in comparable economic contexts such as North definitions highlight a strong interaction between America. We explain this by means of a literature smart city and e-commerce. This interaction is taken review of the historic development of each city model into consideration when future topics of smart retail are defined and analyzed. The following future topics 148 Smart Retail in Smart Cities: Best Practice Analysis of Local Online Platforms of smart retail are examined within SURTRADE high and continually increasing amount of platforms (2018), a current research project in Germany that on the website provides a comprehensive overview of focuses on smart urban retail services. The future platforms in Germany. The study, however, does not topics will be applied later in this paper, in order to consider LOPs outside of the country. In contrast to explain the possible survival of LOPs on the market: this, the website ‘Local Commerce’ offers an insight Integration, Usability, Community and into platforms in Europe and is updated regularly by Sustainability. its initiator Andreas Haderlein. The website lists Integration describes e-commerce interfaces related local stakeholders and provides an overview including different urban functions. Smart cities on the strengths and weaknesses of each platform in represent diverse urban functions in their centers relation to their relevance for e-commerce. Despite apart from commerce such as gastronomy, different both investigations’ relevance for local e-commerce, kinds of services, tourist attraction activities and no comparative research of LOPs has been done so others. Hence, looking at LOPs an integrated far. Analyzing existing framework sources from a approach needs to be adapted in order to show smart spatial point of view, the vast majority of LOPs can cities’ diversity. be found in European cities, with highest densities in Usability refers to the design and accessibility of Germany, Switzerland, Austria and Italy. Only a digital services, which are going to be more small fraction of platforms is detected outside of individual in smart cities and particularly e- Europe, such as Shop Midland, Canada. Thus, the commerce in the future. All services should be distribution of LOPs seems to follow a certain spatial accessible to everyone in every location.
Recommended publications
  • Recommendations for Implementation of Smart Sustainable City Information and Communication Technology Infrastructures in the APEC Region
    Recommendations for Implementation of Smart Sustainable City Information and Communication Technology Infrastructures in the APEC Region APEC Telecommunications and Information Working Group April 2020 APEC Project: TEL 01 2018 Produced by TRAN Nhat Le Viet Nam Telecommunications Authority Duong Dinh Nghe Street, Ha Noi, Viet Nam and NGUYEN Thi Thanh Huong Institute of Posts and Telecommunications Technology Hoang Quoc Viet Street, Ha Noi, Viet Nam For Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68919 600 Fax: (65) 68919 690 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apec.org © 2020 APEC Secretariat APEC#220-TC-01.1 1 CONTENTS Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgement ..................................................................................................... 7 Foreword .................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 1. Overview of Sustainable Smart City .................................................... 10 1. Smart Sustainable City Introduction .............................................................. 12 1.1 Smart Sustainable City Definition .............................................................. 12 1.2 Smart Sustainable City Architecture .......................................................... 15 1.3 ICT Infrastructures for Smart Sustainable City ......................................... 16
    [Show full text]
  • Industry and the Smart City
    Industry and the smart city ZELDA BRONSTEIN These days, U.S. city planning exudes an funded the Smart Growth Network. The net- audacious air. The suburban sprawl that has work’s nearly forty partners include environ- dominated U.S. development since the Second mental groups; historic preservation organiza- World War is under assault from a multitude of tions; professional associations; developers; real policy makers and activists bent on protecting estate interests; and local, state, and govern- the environment and revitalizing city life. Rally- ment entities. One partner, Smart Growth ing to varied watchwords—smart growth, new America, is itself a coalition of more than one urbanism, sustainable development, green de- hundred national, state, and local organizations, velopment, livable communities, traditional including the Sierra Club, the Congress for the neighborhood development—the insurgent ur- New Urbanism, the American Farmland Trust, banists share key goals: mixing land uses, rais- the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and ing density, and ramping up public transit. In the American Planning Association. Working place of auto-centric, single-use districts both together and independently, these groups reached only via traffic-choked roads, they put sponsor numerous conferences, tours, exposi- housing, shops, and offices close to each other tions, focus groups, forums, publications, and and to ample transit options. Given such op- research projects. They vigorously lobby every tions, they contend, people readily abandon level of government. A copious literature rang- their cars and walk or bike to and from work or ing from books to blogs disseminates smart to the bus, train, trolley, ferry, or light or heavy growth’s principles, showcases its success sto- rail that will carry them to and from work.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Smart Cities in the Europe
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY Mapping Smart Cities in the EU STUDY Abstract This report was commissioned to provide background information and advice on Smart Cities in the European Union (EU) and to explain how existing mechanisms perform. In exploring this, a working definition of a Smart City is established and the cities fitting this definition across the Member States are mapped. An analysis of the objectives and Europe 2020 targets of Smart City initiatives finds that despite their early stage of development, Smart City objectives should be more explicit, well defined and clearly aligned to city development, innovation plans and Europe 2020 in order to be successful. IP/A/ITRE/ST/2013-02 January 2014 PE 507.480 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. AUTHORS Catriona MANVILLE, RAND Europe Gavin COCHRANE, RAND Europe Jonathan CAVE, RAND Europe Jeremy MILLARD, Danish Technological Institute Jimmy Kevin PEDERSON, Danish Technological Institute Rasmus Kåre THAARUP, Danish Technological Institute Andrea LIEBE, WiK Matthias WISSNER, WiK Roel MASSINK, TNO Bas KOTTERINK, TNO RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Fabrizio PORRINO Balázs MELLÁR Frédéric GOUARDÈRES Signe JENSEN Cécile KÉRÉBEL Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSION Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact Policy Department A or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in January 2014 © European Union, 2014 This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Trust in Smart City Systems
    January 2020 TRUST IN SMART CITY SYSTEMS Characteristics and Key Considerations Executive Summary The Smart Cities Council, a global advocate for smart city adoption, states that the term “smart cities” still lacks a universally agreed upon definition. [1] However, the term generally refers to the integration of information technology (IT) with the management and operation of civic functions. As these civic functions can include operational technology (OT) elements that monitor and operate physical systems, a smart city system can be seen as representing the intersection of the IT, OT, and public service domains of practice. All three domains are represented by mature fields of practice, but their combination in cross-domain projects can expose gaps within each domain, where key characteristics important to one domain might not be considered by the others. If not addressed, these gaps can introduce security, safety, and privacy risks, including risks to critical infrastructure and its underpinning technology. These risks are not some “distant future” concern. In 2018, investment in smart city technologies is expected to reach $22 billion, and the investment is expected to grow in the future. [2] Hundreds of projects have been deployed or are in some stage of development within the United States. Since these systems are often intended to remain in use for years or decades, the impacts of failures to fully address risks introduced by these systems can be felt for years to come. Between the potential for lingering impact and the aforementioned connection to critical infrastructure, the relevance of smart city projects to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) which is charged with securing this critical infrastructure, is straightforward.
    [Show full text]
  • SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES and COLLABORATION GSMA Seminars Iot Elements: Bringing the Smart City to Life 28Th February 2017, Barcelona (Spain) Prof
    SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES AND COLLABORATION GSMA Seminars IoT Elements: Bringing the Smart City to Life 28th February 2017, Barcelona (Spain) Prof. Luis Muñoz University of Cantabria [email protected] SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES AND COLLABORATION SmartSantander IoT Infrastructure Service Provision Mobility Environmental monitoring Park & gardens Participatory Sensing Augmented Reality Energy Co-creating Massive deployment of IoT devices New urban services Fixed nodes New applications Mobile nodes …relying on the citizen Citizens as sensors Citizens Apps GSMA Seminars: IoT Elements: Bringing the Smart City to Life 28th February 2017, Barcelona (Spain) SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES AND COLLABORATION Street Parking Management Sensors & Panels installation Service Provision & Monitoring GSMA Seminars: IoT Elements: Bringing the Smart City to Life 28th February 2017, Barcelona (Spain) SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES AND COLLABORATION Noise Monitoring GSMA Seminars: IoT Elements: Bringing the Smart City to Life 28th February 2017, Barcelona (Spain) SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES AND COLLABORATION The Urban Platform GSMA Seminars: IoT Elements: Bringing the Smart City to Life 28th February 2017, Barcelona (Spain) SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES AND COLLABORATION Co-creating the City of Tomorrow Experimentation as a new urban service . Lead by the citizen . Palette of tools Experiment ers Co-creat ion Tools EXPERIMENTATION AS A SERVICE London Aarhus Sant ander facilit ies Experiment at ion Dat a Communit ies Services GSMA
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Cities – What’S in It for Citizens?
    SMART CITIES – WHAT’S IN IT FOR CITIZENS? www.juniperresearch.com SMART CITIES – WHAT’S IN IT FOR CITIZENS? 1 Contents Study Background ................................................................................. 2 Smart Cities will Deliver 15 Working Days .......................................... 3 Why do We Need Smart Cities? ............................................................ 4 How do These Factors Affect Me Today?............................................ 5 Global City Performance 2017 .............................................................. 6 Mobility ................................................................................................... 7 Case Study: San Francisco................................................................... 7 Healthcare............................................................................................... 7 Case Study: Seoul ................................................................................. 7 Public Safety .......................................................................................... 7 Case Study: New York City ................................................................... 7 Productivity ............................................................................................ 7 Case Study: London .............................................................................. 7 Appendix: Study Methodology ............................................................. 7 SMART CITIES – WHAT’S IN IT FOR CITIZENS? 2 What is a Smart City?
    [Show full text]
  • The Mega Cities, the Smart Cities, the Sustainable Cities
    The Mega Cities, The Smart Cities, The Sustainable Cities Robert W. FOSTER , USA Key Words: Mega cities, homo sapiens, artificial intelligence, the internet of things, infrastructure, e-systems, interconnectivity, climate change, sustainability. Introduction Modern science dates the Agricultural Revolution to about 12,000 years ago. Homo sapiens, hunters and gatherers for the previous 150 thousand years more or less, began to cultivate wheat which bound them to the land due to seasonal demands of planting, nurturing, harvesting and storage of grains. Instead of roaming over large areas they began to settle into shelters and eventually into villages. The success of the new paradigm of living resulted in collective labor arrangements that led to community security and social cooperation. A logical extension of industry and commerce was development of the city which, in turn has led to innovation, invention, social advancement and, in some views, prosperity. Social scientists, historians and anthropologists may differ as to the value of urban life to the advancement of homo sapiens, but the studies continue and predictions persist. What is the ultimate future of the city – will it prosper to a point of security and happiness for all, or will the city, by concentrating all its environmental and biological risks into ever more clustered areas spell the end of civilization as we know it? In short, is the city sustainable? In fact cities have become the preferred living arrangement for a majority of the World’s population, evolving into what are called Mega Cities. The marvel of the internet in this digital age with its possibilities of instant communication and immediate control of most or all functions of homo sapiens now in the 21st century, are expected to develop the Smart Cities for a majority of us which in turn will make urban sustainability possible a mere 12,000 years after we had begun living and working together: the Sustainable City.
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Smart City Government Insights Building the Smart City Building the Smart City
    Deloitte Center for Building the smart city Government Insights Building the smart city Building the smart city About the authors Rana Sen is a managing director with Deloitte Consulting LLP’s Technology practice. He leads the U.S. Consulting Public Sector Smart City initiative, where his work focuses on strategies and implementations to help cities achieve increased economic competiveness, sustainable practices, and a higher quality of life for their residents. Connect with him at [email protected] or on Twitter @_ranasen or LinkedIn. William D. Eggers is the executive director of the Deloitte Center for Government Insights and author of nine books, including Delivering on Digital: The Innovators and Technology That Are Transforming Government. His commentary has appeared in dozens of major media outlets including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post. He can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter @wdeggers. Mahesh Kelkar is a research manager with the Deloitte Center for Government Insights. He closely tracks the federal and state government sectors, focusing on in-depth research into the intersection of technology with government operations, policy and decision-making. Connect with him at [email protected] or on LinkedIn, or follow him on Twitter @Mahesh_Kelkar Smart city 2.0: The second wave in smart city transformation The term “smart city” doesn’t describe a sci-fi utopia. A smart city is simply one that About the Deloitte Center for Government Insights uses technology to improve outcomes across every aspect of city operations and enhance the services it offers to its residents. It collects and uses data to drive its decision-making, and creates networks of partners among governments, businesses, The Deloitte Center for Government Insights shares inspiring stories of government innovation, looking at what’s behind the adoption of new technologies and management practices.
    [Show full text]
  • SMARTCITYPHL Roadmap
    SMARTCITYPHL SMARTCITYPHL SMARTCITYPHL SMARTCITYPHL SMARTCITYPHL SMARTCITYPHL SMARTCITYPHL Roadmap Table of Contents Introduction 2 Guiding Principles 3 Methodology 4 Existing Assets & Initiatives 5 Reading Guide 6 Strategy 1: Build a strong foundation with 7 policy and infrastructure Strategy 2: Create a process for engagement and 15 partnership Strategy 3: Support and sustain implementation of 20 projects and programs with funding Timeline of Activities 23 1 INTRODUCTION Lead Department: Office of The City of Philadelphia established the SmartCityPHL Innovation & Technology initiative in 2017 to better understand and implement Cabinet Representative: smart and emerging technology solutions that would Chief Administrative Officer improve City service delivery for its broad community of residents, businesses, and visitors. A key component of Working Group: this initiative was to develop this roadmap of strategies Department of Streets and processes to drive the initiative forward. Waste & Litter Cabinet This roadmap is intended to serve as an initial guide to Office of Sustainability. Energy spur innovation and collaboration in City government Office around smart city and the policies and technology Office of Transportation, surrounding it. It is intentionally designed for broad Infrastructure & Sustainability application so that as people and technology change, fundamental practices are applied while leaving room Philadelphia Water Department for iteration when it comes to specific projects and Department of Public Health, programs that
    [Show full text]
  • Smart City Challenge
    SMART CITY CHALLENGE 1 SMART CITY CHALLENGE ADDRESSING THE CHALLENGES OF TODAY AND TOMORROW “Transportation is not just about concrete and steel. It’s about how people want to live.” – Secretary Anthony Foxx In December 2015, we launched our Smart City Challenge, asking mid-sized cities across America to share their ideas for how to create an integrated, first-of-its-kind smart transportation system that would use data, applications, and technology to help people and goods move faster, cheaper, and more efficiently. Over the past year, the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT), under the leadership of Secretary Anthony Foxx, has leveraged nearly $350 million in public and private funds for smart city and advanced transportation technologies. Building on Beyond Traffic 2045, the Smart City Challenge provided a spark for cities looking to revolutionize their transportation systems to help improve people’s lives. Through the Smart City Challenge, the Department committed up to $40 million to one winning city. In response, cities leveraged an additional $500 million in private and public funding to help make their Smart City visions real. And, in October 2016, Secretary Foxx announced an additional $65 million in grants to support community-driven advanced technology transportation projects in cities across America, including 4 of the finalists in the Smart City Challenge. By challenging American cities to use emerging transportation technologies to address their most pressing problems, the Smart City Challenge aimed to spread innovation through a mixture of competition, collaboration, and experimentation. But the Smart City Challenge was about more than just technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Cities and Inclusive Growth
    Smart Cities and Inclusive Growth Building on the outcomes of the 1st OECD Roundtable on Smart Cities and Inclusive Growth With the support of: 2 ABOUT THE OECD The OECD is a multi-disciplinary inter-governmental organisation of 36 member countries which engages in its work an increasing number of non-members from all regions of the world. The Organisation’s core mission today is to help governments work together towards a stronger, cleaner, fairer global economy. Through its network of 250 specialised committees and working groups, the OECD provides a setting where governments compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice, and co-ordinate domestic and international policies. More information available: www.oecd.org. This paper is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and the arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This paper was authorised for publication by Lamia Kamal-Chaoui, Director, Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities, OECD. This document, as well as any statistical data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. © OECD 2020 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as source and copyright owner is given.
    [Show full text]
  • SMART CITIES: PROJECTS CATALOGUE 22 PROJECTS in 21 CITIES Deliverable 1B
    SMART CITIES: PROJECTS CATALOGUE 22 PROJECTS IN 21 CITIES Deliverable 1B ASCIMER PROJECT WORK PACKAGE 1. PART 2 30TH JANUARY 2015 Bank Supervisor: Gerry Muscat (EIB) Project Leader: Andres Monzon (TRANSyT-UPM) Coordinator: Fiamma Perez-Prada (TRANSyT- UPM) Authors: Victoria Fernandez-Anez (TRANSyT- UPM) Guillermo Velazquez-Romera (TRANSyT-UPM) Contributors: Javier Dorao (TRANSyT- UPM) Andrea Torregrosa (TRANSyT-UPM) Mario Martin (TRANSyT-UPM) Gianni Rondinella (TRANSyT-UPM) Collaborators: ASCIMER team Javier Uceda (UPM) Jose Maria de Lapuerta (UPM) Rosa Arce (TRANSyT-UPM) Maria E. Lopez-Lambas (TRANSyT-UPM) Claudio Feijoo (UPM) Sergio Ramos (UPM) Manuel Alvarez-Campana (UPM) Jose Manuel Vassallo (TRANSyT-UPM) Experts Sergio Jara (U. Chile) Jose Miguel Fernandez-Güell (UPM) Mario Aymerich (EIB) Guy Fleuret (UfM) Paul Pfaffenbichler (Vienna University of Technology) Angela Poletti (Politecnico di Milano) Filippo Contenti (Malaga City) Brini Abdellatif (Tanger City) Ali Maqousi (UoP) Lourdes Diaz (National School for Sustainable Land Use Planning) Smart City Best Practices Guide ASCIMER PROJECT WORK PACKAGE 1 CONTENTS PART 2 SMART CITIES: BEST PRACTICES GUIDE 0. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………….1 2.3. SMART CITY PROJECTS IN SOUTH MEDITERRANEAN REGION…………………………………………………………..86 1. SMART CITY PROJECT ACTIONS………………………………7 1.1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………….9 2.4. BEST PRACTICES IN SMART CITY STRATEGIES…………….... 93 1.2. BACKGROUND…………………………………………….11 1.3. SMART GOVERNANCE PROJECT ACTIONS……….....13 3. REFERENCES…………………………………………………………… 99 1.4. SMART ECONOMY PROJECT ACTIONS……………….15 1.5. SMART MOBILITY PROJECT ACTIONS………………….18 ANNEX I: CLASSIFICATION OF SMART CITY PROJECT ACTIONS…101 1.6. SMART ENVIRONMENT PROJECT ACTIONS…………..22 1.7. SMART PEOPLE PROJECT ACTIONS……………………25 1.8. SMART LIVING PROJECT ACTIONS…………………….28 1.9.
    [Show full text]